Search Results

Search found 42998 results on 1720 pages for 'html input'.

Page 149/1720 | < Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >

  • $(document).ready(function(){ executed every time on onclick event of Hyperlink?

    - by Photon Critical Fatal Error_
    In my code I'm creating a product list dynamically using PHP(see image) and the currosponding labels and image paths are stored into hidden fields(created dynamically using PHP) now on document.ready() method i set the first list item's imagepath to img's src and its remarks to label remarks using first hidden fields for remark and imagepath. and on listitem click i want to change it my function set these values to img and label rightly(checked using alerts) but when function ends it set the image src and remarks innertext to default that is set on document.ready() method now my question is can i prevent the document.ready() to be executed next time on javascript function call My View : As the images are reloaded so the page rendering is done again so the document.ready is called again and set these values again to default. Note : My page is not reloading any time only images and labels are being changed The listshown in image is just one group other group is also created dynamically . server side code in PHP <?php for($j=0;$j<count($productstr);$j++) { $valuerem = $productstr[$j]["pcode"]; $idrem = "rem".$j.$grp; $valueimg =$productstr[$j]["imgpath"]; $idimg = "img".$j.$grp; echo "<input type='hidden' value='$valuerem' id='$idrem' />" ; echo "<input type='hidden' value='$valueimg' id='$idimg' />" ; }?> <script> $(document).ready(function() { idrv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > = 'rem0<?PHP echo $grp; ?>'; idmv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > = 'img0<?PHP echo $grp; ?>'; $('#txt<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').text(document.getElementById(idrv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? ).value); alert($('#txt<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').text()); $('#img<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').attr('src', document.getElementById(idmv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > ).value); alert($('#img<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').attr('src')); }); function Change(id) { idrv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > = 'rem' + id; idmv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > = 'img' + id; $('#txt<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').text(document.getElementById(idrv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > ).value); alert($('#txt<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').text()); $('#img<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').attr('src', document.getElementById(idmv < ? PHP echo $grp; ? > ).value); alert($('#img<?PHP echo $grp; ?>').attr('src')); return true; }? </script> alerts are used just to test the values the code that are being generated at client browser <tr> <td width="220px" valign="top" align="left"> <input id="YN" type="hidden" value="true"> <input id="rem00" type="hidden" value="SPL FUNNEL 1"> <input id="img00" type="hidden" value="adminpanel/product_images/4f8e530154d74155.jpg"> <input id="rem10" type="hidden" value="SPL FUNNEL 2"> <input id="img10" type="hidden" value="adminpanel/product_images/4f8e53daf13e6156.jpg"> <input id="rem20" type="hidden" value="SPL FUNNEL 3"> <input id="img20" type="hidden" value="adminpanel/product_images/4f8e543100eaf157.jpg"> <input id="rem30" type="hidden" value="SPL FUNNEL 4"> <input id="img30" type="hidden" value="adminpanel/product_images/4f8e545a829e1158.jpg"> <script> $(document).ready(function() { idrv0 = 'rem00'; idmv0 = 'img00'; $('#txt0').text(document.getElementById(idrv0).value); alert($('#txt0').text()); $('#img0').attr('src', document.getElementById(idmv0).value); alert($('#img0').attr('src')); }); function Change(id) { $('#YN').val('false'); idrv0 = 'rem' + id; idmv0 = 'img' + id; $('#txt0').text(document.getElementById(idrv0).value); alert($('#txt0').text()); $('#img0').attr('src', document.getElementById(idmv0).value); alert($('#img0').attr('src')); return true; }? </script> <ul> <li> <a id="00" style="text-decoration: none; text-size: 1.1em; color: " onclick=" Change(this.id); alert($('#txt0').text()); alert($('#img0').attr('src'));"> SPL FUNNEL 1</a> </li> <li> <li> <li> </ul> </td> <td valign="bottom" align="left" colspan="2"> <td width="110px" valign="bottom" align="left" style="width: 180px"> </tr>

    Read the article

  • reading the file name from user input in MIPS assembly

    - by Hassan Al-Jeshi
    I'm writing a MIPS assembly code that will ask the user for the file name and it will produce some statistics about the content of the file. However, when I hard code the file name into a variable from the beginning it works just fine, but when I ask the user to input the file name it does not work. after some debugging, I have discovered that the program adds 0x00 char and 0x0a char (check asciitable.com) at the end of user input in the memory and that's why it does not open the file based on the user input. anyone has any idea about how to get rid of those extra chars, or how to open the file after getting its name from the user?? here is my complete code (it is working fine except for the file name from user thing, and anybody is free to use it for any purpose he/she wants to): .data fin: .ascii "" # filename for input msg0: .asciiz "aaaa" msg1: .asciiz "Please enter the input file name:" msg2: .asciiz "Number of Uppercase Char: " msg3: .asciiz "Number of Lowercase Char: " msg4: .asciiz "Number of Decimal Char: " msg5: .asciiz "Number of Words: " nline: .asciiz "\n" buffer: .asciiz "" .text #----------------------- li $v0, 4 la $a0, msg1 syscall li $v0, 8 la $a0, fin li $a1, 21 syscall jal fileRead #read from file move $s1, $v0 #$t0 = total number of bytes li $t0, 0 # Loop counter li $t1, 0 # Uppercase counter li $t2, 0 # Lowercase counter li $t3, 0 # Decimal counter li $t4, 0 # Words counter loop: bge $t0, $s1, end #if end of file reached OR if there is an error in the file lb $t5, buffer($t0) #load next byte from file jal checkUpper #check for upper case jal checkLower #check for lower case jal checkDecimal #check for decimal jal checkWord #check for words addi $t0, $t0, 1 #increment loop counter j loop end: jal output jal fileClose li $v0, 10 syscall fileRead: # Open file for reading li $v0, 13 # system call for open file la $a0, fin # input file name li $a1, 0 # flag for reading li $a2, 0 # mode is ignored syscall # open a file move $s0, $v0 # save the file descriptor # reading from file just opened li $v0, 14 # system call for reading from file move $a0, $s0 # file descriptor la $a1, buffer # address of buffer from which to read li $a2, 100000 # hardcoded buffer length syscall # read from file jr $ra output: li $v0, 4 la $a0, msg2 syscall li $v0, 1 move $a0, $t1 syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, nline syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, msg3 syscall li $v0, 1 move $a0, $t2 syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, nline syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, msg4 syscall li $v0, 1 move $a0, $t3 syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, nline syscall li $v0, 4 la $a0, msg5 syscall addi $t4, $t4, 1 li $v0, 1 move $a0, $t4 syscall jr $ra checkUpper: blt $t5, 0x41, L1 #branch if less than 'A' bgt $t5, 0x5a, L1 #branch if greater than 'Z' addi $t1, $t1, 1 #increment Uppercase counter L1: jr $ra checkLower: blt $t5, 0x61, L2 #branch if less than 'a' bgt $t5, 0x7a, L2 #branch if greater than 'z' addi $t2, $t2, 1 #increment Lowercase counter L2: jr $ra checkDecimal: blt $t5, 0x30, L3 #branch if less than '0' bgt $t5, 0x39, L3 #branch if greater than '9' addi $t3, $t3, 1 #increment Decimal counter L3: jr $ra checkWord: bne $t5, 0x20, L4 #branch if 'space' addi $t4, $t4, 1 #increment words counter L4: jr $ra fileClose: # Close the file li $v0, 16 # system call for close file move $a0, $s0 # file descriptor to close syscall # close file jr $ra Note: I'm using MARS Simulator, if that makes any different

    Read the article

  • WMD markdown editor - HTML to Markdown conversion

    - by gg1
    I am using wmd markdown editor on a project and had a question: When I post the form containing the markdown text area, it (as expected) posts html to the server. However, say upon server-side validation something fails and I need to send the user back to edit their entry, is there anyway to refill the textarea with just the markdown and not the html? Since as I have it set up, the server only has access to the post data (which is in the form of html) so I can't seem to think of a way to do this. Any ideas? Preferably a non-javascript based solution. Update: I found an html to markdown converter called markdownify. I guess this might be the best solution for displaying the markdown back to the user...any better alternatives are welcome! Update 2: I found this post on SO and I guess there is an option to send the data to the server as markdown instead of html. Are there any downsides to simply storing the data as markdown in the database? What about displaying it back to the user (outside of an editor)? Maybe it would be best to post both versions (html AND markdown) to the server... SOLVED: I can simply use php markdown to convert the markdown to html serverside.

    Read the article

  • Open Fancybox (or equiv) from Form input type="submit"

    - by nickmorss
    is there a way to get a fancybox (http://fancy.klade.lv/) or any other lightbox from submitting a FORM (with an image button)? HTML looks like this: <form action="/ACTION/FastFindObj" method="post"> <input name="fastfind" class="fastfind" value="3463" type="text"> <input name="weiter" type="submit"> </form> These won't do: $("form").fancybox(); $("input").fancybox(); $("input[name='weiter']").fancybox(); Anyone spotting my mistake or having a workaround or an alternative script? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • function using cl-who:with-html-output ignoring parameter

    - by shanked
    I'm not sure whether this is an issue with my use of cl-who (specifically with-html-output-to-string and with-html-output) or an issue with my understanding of Common Lisp (as this is my first project using Lisp). I created a function to create form fields: (defun form-field (type name label) (cl-who:with-html-output (*standard-output* nil) (:div :class "field" (:label :for name label) (:input :type type :name name)))) When using this function, ie: (form-field "text" "username" "Username") the parameter label seems to be ignored... the HTML output is: <div class="field"><label for="username"></label> <input type="text" name="username"/></div> instead of the expected output: <div class="field"><label for="username">Username</label> <input type="text" name="username"/></div> If I modify the function and add a print statement: (defun form-field (type name label) (cl-who:with-html-output (*standard-output* nil) (print label) (:div :class "field" (:label :for name label) (:input :type type :name name)))) The "Username" string is successfully output (but still ignored in the HTML)... any ideas what might cause this? Keep in mind, I'm calling this function within a cl-who:with-html-output-to-string for use with hunchentoot.

    Read the article

  • passing input text value to ajax call

    - by amby
    Hi, I have to pass string entered in the input text to server method calling through jquery ajax. But its not going through. can please somebody tell me what i m doing wrong here. Below is the code: $.ajaxSetup({ cache: false timeout: 1000000}); function concatObject(obj) { strArray = []; //new Array for (prop in obj) { strArray.push(prop + " value :" + obj[prop]); } return strArray.join();} //var Eid = "stephen.gilroy1"; function testCAll() { //var ntid = $('#Eid').val(); $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "Testing.aspx/SendMessage", //data: "{'ntid':'stephen.gilroy1'}", //working data: "{'ntid': $('#Eid').val()}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(result) { alert(result.d); resultData = eval("(" + result.d + ")"); $("#rawResponse").html(result.d); //$("#response").html(resultData.sn); }, error: function(result) { alert("jQuery Error:" + result.statusText); } });}$.ajaxSetup({ cache: false //timeout: 1000000 }); function concatObject(obj) { strArray = []; //new Array for (prop in obj) { strArray.push(prop + " value :" + obj[prop]); } return strArray.join(); } //var Eid = "stephen.gilroy1"; function testCAll() { //var ntid = $('#Eid').val(); $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "Testing.aspx/SendMessage", //data: "{'ntid':'stephen.gilroy1'}", //working data: "{'ntid': $('#Eid').val()}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(result) { alert(result.d); resultData = eval("(" + result.d + ")"); $("#rawResponse").html(result.d); //$("#response").html(resultData.sn); }, error: function(result) { alert("jQuery Error:" + result.statusText); } }); } above is js file and below is its aspx file: <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Testing.aspx.cs" Inherits="Testing" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title></title> <script src="jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="Testing.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="json2.js" type="text/javascript"></script> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div> Employee's NTID: <input type="text" id = "Eid" name="Employee_NTID" /> <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server"> </asp:GridView> <br /> <br /> <input type="button" onclick="testCAll()" value = "Search"/> <div id="rawResponse"></div> <hr /> <div id="response"></div> </div> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • REST API Best practice: How to accept as input a list of parameter values

    - by whatupwilly
    Hi All, We are launching a new REST API and I wanted some community input on best practices around how we should have input parameters formatted: Right now, our API is very JSON-centric (only returns JSON). The debate of whether we want/need to return XML is a separate issue. As our API output is JSON centric, we have been going down a path where our inputs are a bit JSON centric and I've been thinking that may be convenient for some but weird in general. For example, to get a few product details where multiple products can be pulled at once we currently have: http://our.api.com/Product?id=["101404","7267261"] Should we simplify this as: http://our.api.com/Product?id=101404,7267261 Or is having JSON input handy? More of a pain? We may want to accept both styles but does that flexibility actually cause more confusion and head aches (maintainability, documentation, etc.)? A more complex case is when we want to offer more complex inputs. For example, if we want to allow multiple filters on search: http://our.api.com/Search?term=pumas&filters={"productType":["Clothing","Bags"],"color":["Black","Red"]} We don't necessarily want to put the filter types (e.g. productType and color) as request names like this: http://our.api.com/Search?term=pumas&productType=["Clothing","Bags"]&color=["Black","Red"] Because we wanted to group all filter input together. In the end, does this really matter? It may be likely that there are so many JSON utils out there that the input type just doesn't matter that much. I know our javascript clients making AJAX calls to the API may appreciate the JSON inputs to make their life easier. Thanks, Will

    Read the article

  • java console input

    - by Bipul
    The data type of the any input through console (as i do using BufferedReader class) is String.After that we type cast it to requered data type(as Inter.parseInt() for integer).But in C we can take input of any primitive data type whereas in java all input types are neccerily String.why it is so????

    Read the article

  • Google AJAX Transliteration API: Is it possible to make all input fields in the page transliteratabl

    - by SolidSnakeGTI
    Hello, I've used "Google AJAX Transliteration API" and it's going well with me. http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlanguage/documentation/referenceTransliteration.html Currently I've a project that I need all input fields in every page (input & textarea tags) to be transliteratable, while these input fields differs from page to page (dynamic). As I know, I've to call makeTransliteratable(elementIds, opt_options) method in the API call to define which input fields to make transliteratable, and in my case here I can't predefine those fields manually. Is there a way to achieve this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Ubiquity CmdUtils.setSelection won't replace HTML

    - by Josh Timmer
    I'm attempting to write a Ubiquity command that allows you to replace a selected link or URL pointing to an image with that image itself. However, the CmdUtils.setSelection() function (documented here) seems to do nothing if any html tags are present in the selection, making it useless for replacing any links. When selecting plain text, it functions exactly as intended, replacing the text with an <img src="text"/> tag. Is there something I'm missing, or will this function simply not allow me to replace html? If the latter is the case, is there a function or method that will allow me to do this? Any other advice is welcome as well! CmdUtils.CreateCommand({ name: "fetch-image", author: {name: "Josh Timmer"}, license: "GPL", description: "Replaces links or URLs pointing to images with the image itself", help: "Highlight text or a hyperlink and execute this command", takes: {"image URL": /.*/}, _getImgUrl: function(itemIq) { if (itemIq.html.indexOf("<a ",0) < 0) return itemIq.text; var refPos = itemIq.html.indexOf("href=\"",0); if (refPos < 0) return "Error, no URL found!"; var startPos = itemIq.html.indexOf("\"", refPos); var endPos = itemIq.html.indexOf("\"", startPos + 1); startPos += 1; var url = itemIq.html.substring(startPos, endPos); return url; }, preview: function(pblock, input) { pblock.innerHTML = "Image URL: " + this._getImgUrl(input) + "<br/><br/><img src='" + this._getImgUrl(input) + "'/>"; }, execute: function img_insert(input) { CmdUtils.setSelection("<img src='" + this._getImgUrl(input) + "'/>"); displayMessage("Executed: " + this._getImgUrl(input)); } });

    Read the article

  • 'echo' or drop out of 'programming' write HTML then start PHP code again

    - by thecoshman
    For the most part, when I want to display some HTML code to be actually rendered I would use a 'close PHP' tag, write the HTML, then open the PHP again. eg <?php // some php code ?> <p>HTML that I want displayed</p> <?php // more php code ?> But I have seen lots of people who would just use echo instead, so they would have done the above something like <?php // some php code echo("<p>HTML that I want displayed</p>"); // more php code ?> Is their any performance hit for dropping out and back in like that? I would assume not as the PHP engine would have to process the entire file either way. What about when you use the echo function in the way that dose not look like a function, eg echo "<p>HTML that I want displayed</p>" I would hope that this is purely a matter of taste, but I would like to know if I was missing out on something. I personally find the first way preferable (dropping out of PHP then back in) as it helps draw a clear distinction between PHP and HTML and also lets you make use of code highlighting and hinting for your HTML, which is always handy.

    Read the article

  • javascript/jquery input fields cleanup

    - by user271619
    I've created a few input fields, that I am cleaning up as the user types. So, I'm using a keystroke detection event, like .keyup() It's all working very well, but I do notice one thing that's rather annoying for the users. While the script is cleaning the data as they type, their cursor is being sent to the end of the input field. So, if you want to edit the middle of the value, you're cursor immediately goes to the end of the box. Does anyone know of a way to maintain the cursor's current position inside the input field? I'm not holding my breath, but I thought I'd ask. Here's the cleanup code I'm using: $(".pricing").keyup(function(){ // clean up anything non-numeric **var itemprice = $("#itemprice").val().replace(/[^0-9\.]+/g, '');** // return the cleaner value back to the input field **$("#itemprice").val(itemprice);** });

    Read the article

  • Add mask to input

    - by Lodewijk Wensveen
    I'm trying to achieve the seemingly impossible task of adding an mask to a input field. I have the following code: function addActivationCode(){ newRow = jQuery("div.activationcode:last-child").clone(); newRow.insertAfter(jQuery("div.activationcode:last-child")); newRow.attr("id", "coderow-" + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000)); newRow.find("input").val(""); find("input").mask("9999-9999-9999-9999"); newRow.find("a.coderemove").attr("onclick", "removeActivationCode('" + newRow.attr("id") + "'); return false;"); } function removeActivationCode(id){ jQuery("div#" + id).remove(); } Now I to get the .mask working on my input fields, so far I've only got it working on the new row I'm making and not on the original one. Can anyone help me out?

    Read the article

  • Cocoa/Objective-C - Child window with text input without main window becoming inactive

    - by Josh
    Hello All, I have a need to spawn a window that will hover just above my main window in a cocoa application. I want this main window to allow the user to enter some text in an input box. All is well until the text input box actually gains focus. The main window becomes "deactivated." This window is borderless and is a slightly custom shape -- its more like a hover card than anything else, I suppose. Basically, I'd like this thing to work almost exactly like Spotlight (Apple + Space) -- you can enter text, but this is such an an ancillary operation that in the context of the greater UX, you don't want the jarring effect of the main window graying out (becoming inactive). You'll notice when you have some application open and in-focus, spotlight will not cause the window of that application to become inactive. This problem arises because text input seems to REQUIRE that the child window become the key window (it will not let you place the cursor in the text input field). When it becomes key, the main window becomes inactive. So far I've tried: Subclassing NSWindow for my main application and overriding isKeyWindow such that it only loses key when the application is no longer the users focus (as opposed to the window). This had the unintended effect of colliding with key status of the child window and having very strange effects on the keyboard input (some keys are not captured, like delete) Creating a view instead of a window. Doesn't work because of this problem -- you cannot draw over a Webkit WebView these days. Anybody Cocoa/OSX wizards have any ideas? I've become a little obsessed with this one. An itch I can't scratch.

    Read the article

  • Does using the converting input from HTML forms into htmlentities protect attacks invoving JavaScrip

    - by racl101
    Hi everyone, I was wondering if converting POST input from an HTML form into html entities, (via the PHP function htmlentities() or using the FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS constant in tandem with the filter_input() PHP function ), will help defend against any attacks where a user attempts to insert any JavaScript code inside the form field or if there's any other PHP based function or tactic I should employ to create a safe HTML form experience? Sorry for the loaded run-on sentence question but that's the best I could word it in a hurry. Any responses would be greatly appreciated and thanks to all in advance. racl101

    Read the article

  • How can Safari be prevented from scrolling an overflow:hidden iframe?

    - by Alexander Ljungberg
    With Safari you can disable most iframe scrolling by setting style="overflow: hidden;" on the iframe. However, if you click in the iframe and move the mouse the content scrolls anyhow. Example: <html> <body> <iframe style="width: 100%; height:100px; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" src="scrollcontent.html"> </iframe> </body> </html> scrollcontent.html: <html scroll="no" style="overflow:hidden;"> <body scroll="no" style="overflow:hidden;"> <div style="background-color: green; height:100px;">A</div> <div style="background-color: red; height:100px;">B</div> </body> </html> In this example, the iframe should only show a green area and it should be impossible to reveal the red area. This is mostly true: there is no scrollbar, the mouse wheel doesn't do anything and neither do the arrow keys. However click and drag still scrolls the view. This is particularly noticeable when selecting text. Does anyone know any trick to stop Safari from doing this?

    Read the article

  • Scroll an input box to the cursor position in javascript

    - by sirlark
    I've written a simple JS function that places the cursor at the end of the contents of an input box when it receives focus (the most common action in the box being to append). I haven't checked in IE, but when there is more text than is visible, even moving the cursor to the end of input doesn't scroll the view to the end of input in firefox 3.6. Any idea how to do this? P.S. And no I'm not using JQuery, nor is it an option ;)

    Read the article

  • Following code overflows my browser window

    - by oneat
    Why following HTML (CSS) code: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <title></title> </head> <body> <style type="text/css"> *{margin:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px;} div#header{width:100%;height:10%;min-width:100px;height:30%;background-color:red;} div#left_bar{width:20%;height:85%;float:left;background-color:green;} div#content{width:80%;height:85%;float:left;background-color:yellow;} div#foot{width:100%;height:5%;clear:both;background-color:black;} </style> <div id="header">a</div> <div id="left_bar">s</div> <div id="content">d</div> <div id="foot">f</div> </body> </html> Fails to fill my browser's (firefox 3.6.13 linux) window? I mean that I have to scroll down to see bottom. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Trigger jQueryUI datePicker on button click, send result to disabled input field

    - by Enrique
    Hi I've been searching for a way to do this, but could not find anything I want to have a: a disabled input text field, called #XX. This input will store the selected value from datepicker (as this input is disabled I won't be able to use this to trigger the datePicker) A button, besides #XX. When user clicks this button, datePicker will show. User will select the date, and this date will be assigned to disabled input #XX. I want this so user can't change manually -by typing crap- the selected date Also, should I validate if date was entered using #XX.val()? or is there a better way? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using Javascript to submit forms.

    - by Razor Storm
    I am using a jQuery function to submit a form when a certain button is pressed, however this seems to have no effect on the form. My code is as follows: HTML: <form id="loginForm" action="" method="POST"> <input class="loginInput" type="hidden" name="action" value="login"> <input id="step1a" class="loginInput" type="text" name="username"> <input id="step2a" class="loginInput" type="password" name="password" style="display:none;"> <input id="step1b" class="loginSubmit" onclick="loginProceed();" type="button" name="submit" value="Proceed" title="Proceed" /> <input id="step2b" class="loginSubmit" onclick="submitlogin();" type="button" value="Validate" title="Validate" style="display:none;" /> Javascript: function submitlogin() { $("form").submit(); } However, when I press the button, absolutely nothing occurs. PS. This function may seem meaningless since I can just use a input type="submit" but I originally intended this to have some more functionality, I stripped the function to its bare bones for testing purposes.

    Read the article

  • Change input text to regular text on blur and ability to edit jQuery

    - by eknown
    I'm creating a form where I'm eliminating the use of a save button. The form is made up of input text boxes and textareas. After the user enters data into the input field, I want to trigger an onBlur function and change the input into a span that contains the information that the user entered. I also want to have the ability to edit this information, so if the user clicks on the newly created span with text, it will turn back into the input field with the current information for their editing pleasure. For reference, I'm looking to have a functionality pretty much like on editing a photo title on Flickr. If possible, I'd also like to have the textbox show "saving..." for half a second after the blur to reflect interaction with server.

    Read the article

  • ajax to populate an input type text

    - by kawtousse
    hi, I have an input type text that i want to populate it with a value from data base using the ajax technique. first i define my text zone like the following: <td><input type=text id='st' value=" " name='stname' onclick="donnom();" /></td> in javascript i do the following: xhr5.onreadystatechange = function(){ if(xhr5.readyState == 4 && xhr5.status == 200) { selects5 = xhr5.responseText; // On se sert de innerHTML pour rajouter les options a la liste document.getElementById('st').innerHTML = selects5; } }; xhr5.open("POST","ajaxIDentifier5.jsp",true); xhr5.setRequestHeader('Content-Type','application/x-www-form-urlencoded'); id=document.getElementById(idIdden).value; xhr5.send("id="+id); in IDentifier5.jsp i put the next code: '<%String id=request.getParameter("id"); System.out.println("idDailyTimeSheet ajaxIDentifier5 as is:"+id); Session s = null; Transaction tx; try { s= HibernateUtil.currentSession(); tx=s.beginTransaction(); Query query = s.createQuery("select from Dailytimesheet dailytimesheet where dailytimesheet.IdDailyTimeSheet="+id+" " ); for(Iterator it=query.iterate();it.hasNext();) { if(it.hasNext()) { Dailytimesheet object=(Dailytimesheet)it.next(); out.print( "<input type=\"text\" id=\"st1\" value=\""+object.getTimeFrom()+"\" name=\"starting\" onclick=\"donnom()\" ></input>"); } } }catch (HibernateException e) { e.printStackTrace();} %> i want to get only the value in the input type text populated from database because after that i will be able to change it . thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • disallow selection inside an input element

    - by mkoryak
    I am looking to do the following Disallow text selection inside of an input element Do not show the cursor carrot inside of an input i cannot simply blur the input on click, focus must remain in the input. There is probably a way to do this in just IE, i would of course rather have a cross browser solution but ill settle for IE (or FF) only solution. Here is a demo page where you can see why i might need this functionality: http://programmingdrunk.com/current-projects/dropdownReplacement/ if you click on the dropdowns in the first row on page, you will see the carrot inside the dropdown which looks funny. (this wont happen in chrome, but will in FF or IE)

    Read the article

  • css height and width problem.

    - by Reigel
    Hi, I have this HTML <div class="someClass"> <ul> <li><a href="index.html">1</a></li> <li><a href="index.html">2</a></li> <li><a href="index.html">3</a></li> <li><a href="index.html">4</a></li> <li><a href="index.html">5</a></li> </ul> </div> Problem: I want to make the <a>s to shape like a square, with height = 20px and width = 20px. I can make it have the height and width if I make it float: left. In there the problem occur cause I need the <ul> to be centered but it won't because of the float:left of the <a>. how can I make it centered with fix height and width of the anchors? note: anchors don't have fixed length... the sample is just 5, but it can also grow to 7, or 9. I also need the links to be inline in view.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >