Search Results

Search found 14838 results on 594 pages for 'architecture rest json s'.

Page 150/594 | < Previous Page | 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157  | Next Page >

  • Restful authentication between two GAE apps.

    - by user259349
    Hello everyone, i am trying to write a restful google app engine application (python) that accepts requests only from another GAE that i wrote. I dont like any of the ways that i thought of to get this done, please advice if you know of something better than: Get SSL setup, and simply add the credentials on the request that my consuming app will send. I dont like it cause SSL will slow things down. Security by obsecurity. Add a random number in my request that is in Xmod0, where X is a secret number that both applications know. I just,,,, dont like this. Check the HTTP header to see where is the request coming from. This option is the one that i hate the least, not alot of processing, and spoofing an HTTP request is not really worth it, for my application's data. Is there any other clean solution for this?

    Read the article

  • How do you prevent brute force attacks on RESTful data services

    - by Adrian Grigore
    Hi, I'm about to implement an RESTful API to our website (based on WCF data services, but that probably does not matter). All data offered via this API belongs to certain users of my server, so I need to make sure only those users have access to my resources. For this reason, all requests have to be performed with a login/password combination as part of the request. What's the recommended approach for preventing brute force attacks in this scenario? I was thinking of logging failed requests denied due to wrong credentials and ignoring requests originating from the same IP after a certain threshold of failed requests has been exceeded. Is this the standard approach, or am I a missing something important? Thanks, Adrian

    Read the article

  • ExtJs: Tree: how download then select using AJAX calls ?

    - by Olivier Pons
    Hi, Here's my goal : - open a tree - download the root nodes - expand automatically one specific node using AJAX (and loop n times here) until i find a leaf then select the leaf Here's the function that works when I declare the Tree : listeners: { load: function(n) { console.log('load(n)'); n.eachChild( function(n) { if ((n.id=='lys/2007') || (n.id=='lys/2007/08') || (n.id=='lys/2007/08/29')) { n.expand(false,false); } }); } } But if I don't know how to make it more "generic" (almost exactly like the ExtJs documentation). But they don't jump automatically to a specific node (i.e. I want no user interaction). Any idea / advice how to do this? Don't hesitate to edit my post to make it proper English :)

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails protect_from_forgery best practice

    - by randombits
    I'm currently working on building a RESTful web api with ruby on rails. I haven't bothered putting a proper authentication scheme into the API yet as I'm ensuring that tests and the basic behavior of the API is working all locally first. Upon testing non-HTTP GET type requests such as HTTP POST/DELETE/PUT, stuff chokes because protect_from_forgery is on by default. How does this work when I'm working in practice since essentially the idea is in a RESTful API that there is no state. The client does not have a session or a cookie associated with the server. Each request is an atomic, self-executed request. The user will supply some credentials to ensure they are who they say they are, but other than that, does protect_from_forgery make sense at this point? Should it remain enabled?

    Read the article

  • jquery ui autocomplete with database

    - by user301766
    I fairly new to JQuery and perhaps trying to achieve something that might be abit harder for a beginner. However I am trying to create an autocomplete that sends the current value to a PHP script and then returns the necessary values. Here is my Javascript code $("#login_name").autocomplete({ source: function(request, response) { $.ajax({ url: "http://www.myhost.com/myscript.php", dataType: "jsonp", success: function(data) { alert(data); response($.map(data, function(item) { return { label: item.user_login_name, value: item.user_id } })) } }) }, minLength: 2 }); And here is the the last half of "myscript.php" while($row = $Database->fetch(MYSQLI_ASSOC)) { foreach($row as $column=>$val) { $results[$i][$column] = $val; } $i++; } print json_encode($results); Which produces the following output [{"user_id":"2","user_login_name":"Name1"},{"user_id":"3","user_login_name":"Name2"},{"user_id":"4","user_login_name":"Name3"},{"user_id":"5","user_login_name":"Name4"},{"user_id":"6","user_login_name":"Name5"},{"user_id":"7","user_login_name":"Name6"}] Can anyone tell me where I am going wrong please? Starting to get quite frustrated. The input box just turns "white" and no options are shown. The code does work if I specify an array of values.

    Read the article

  • has_many, belongs_to and comment forms

    - by Koning Baard XIV
    I'm having two models: Snippet and SnippetComment. These also have their own controllers, as well as views. In /app/views/snippets/show.html.erb I have a form that starts like this: <% form_for(@new_snippet_comment) do |form| %> SnippetComment belongs to one Snippet, and a Snippet belongs to one User. This means that I have this routing: map.resources :users do |user| user.resources :snippets do |snippet| snippet.resources :snippet_comments, :as => "comments" end end So when I submit the SnippetComment form in the SnippetController#show view, this request should be made: POST /users/x/snippets/x/comments HTTP/1.1 (where x is the User's or Snippet's id). The problem is that I don't even get the comment submission form, but rahter this: NoMethodError in Snippets#show Showing app/views/snippets/show.html.erb where line #29 raised: undefined method `snippet_comments_path' for Extracted source (around line #29): 26: <% if current_user %> 27: <h2>Schrijf een nieuwe reactie</h2> 28: 29: <% form_for(@new_snippet_comment) do |form| %> 30: 31: <p> 32: <%= form.text_area :body %> RAILS_ROOT: /Users/jeffatwood/Dev/youjustdontneedmyrealname Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /Users/jeffatwood/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/polymorphic_routes.rb:107:in `__send__' /Users/jeffatwood/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/polymorphic_routes.rb:107:in `polymorphic_url' /Users/jeffatwood/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/polymorphic_routes.rb:114:in `polymorphic_path' /Users/jeffatwood/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb:298:in `apply_form_for_options!' /Users/jeffatwood/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb:277:in `form_for' /Users/jeffatwood/Dev/youjustdontneedmyrealname/app/views/snippets/show.html.erb:29:in `_run_erb_app47views47snippets47show46html46erb' /Users/jeffatwood/Dev/youjustdontneedmyrealname/app/controllers/snippets_controller.rb:19:in `show' Request Parameters: {"id"=>"1", "user_id"=>"2"} Show session dump Response Headers: {"Content-Type"=>"text/html", "Cache-Control"=>"no-cache"} Can anyone help me with this problem? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to convert an object to the serialized syntax for data in jquery.ajax function?

    - by Matthew
    I have an object that I want to send with my jquery.ajax function but I can't find anything that will convert it to the serialized format I need. $.ajax({ type: 'post', url: 'www.example.com', data: MyObject, success: function(data) { $('.data').html(data) } }) MyObject = [ { "UserId": "2", "UserLevel": "5", "FirstName": "Matthew" }, { "UserId": "4", "UserLevel": "5", "FirstName": "Craig" } ]

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to implement X-HTTP-Method-Override in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by Greg Beech
    I'm implementing a prototype of a RESTful API using ASP.NET MVC and apart from the odd bug here and there I've achieve all the requirements I set out at the start, apart from callers being able to use the X-HTTP-Method-Override custom header to override the HTTP method. What I'd like is that the following request... GET /someresource/123 HTTP/1.1 X-HTTP-Method-Override: DELETE ...would be dispatched to my controller method that implements the DELETE functionality rather than the GET functionality for that action (assuming that there are multiple methods implementing the action, and that they are marked with different [AcceptVerbs] attributes). So, given the following two methods, I would like the above request to be dispatched to the second one: [ActionName("someresource")] [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Get)] public ActionResult GetSomeResource(int id) { /* ... */ } [ActionName("someresource")] [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Delete)] public ActionResult DeleteSomeResource(int id) { /* ... */ } Does anybody know if this is possible? And how much work would it be to do so...?

    Read the article

  • Cross Domain Scripting Issues & JSONP

    - by DaveDev
    Our Client requires that we supply Widgits for their site. They want to link to us to get Html & the jQuery required to manipulate the Html and do asynchronous requests. I understand that there are cross-domain security limitations that would prevent this from being a possibility, but that some of those limitations are aleviated by using JSONP as the data transfer format. I'm finding it difficult in finding an explanation of what's possible in the context of what I'm trying to achieve. Could somebody please fill me in?

    Read the article

  • Simplejson dumps char \

    - by Monty
    Hi! Im programming with django and i need to serialize an object to a string, but i need to get the string \/ serialized. An example: simplejson.dumps({'id' : 'root\/leaf'}) I need an output like this: '{"id": "root\/leaf"}' but i get this: '{"id": "root\\\\leaf"}' Thank you!! PD: Sorry for my english :-P

    Read the article

  • ColdFusion MVC frameworks & RESTful Service mismatch?

    - by Henry
    Most CF MVC Frameworks use the front controller pattern. Usually Search Engine Safe (SES) plugin together with URL Rewrite are used to construct friendly URLs. However, when it comes to implementing RESTful services, using a MVC framework seems like a layer of complexity added on top of another layer of complexity. How should one tame this beast? Any nice and clean approach of supporting RESTful services with ColdFusion? Any MVC framework out there that can expose RESTful services easily? Thanks

    Read the article

  • GWT-EXT tree xml Error

    - by ehab refaat
    i am new to GWT GWT-EXT and i mimic it's demo the problem is where i should put xml file final TreePanel treePanel = new TreePanel() { { setAnimate(true); setEnableDD(true); setContainerScroll(true); setRootVisible(true); } }; final XMLTreeLoader loader = new XMLTreeLoader() { { setDataUrl("countries-cb.xml"); setMethod("get"); setRootTag("countries"); setFolderIdMapping("@id"); setLeafIdMapping("@id"); setFolderTitleMapping("@title"); setFolderTag("team"); setLeafTitleMapping("@title"); setLeafTag("country"); setQtipMapping("@qtip"); setDisabledMapping("@disabled"); setCheckedMapping("@checked"); setIconMapping("@icon"); setAttributeMappings(new String[]{"@rank"}); } }; AsyncTreeNode root = new AsyncTreeNode("Countries", loader); treePanel.setRootNode(root); treePanel.render(); root.expand(); treePanel.expandAll();

    Read the article

  • Destroying nested resources in restful way

    - by Alex
    I'm looking for help destroying a nested resource in Merb. My current method seems near correct, but the controller raise an InternalServerError during the destruction of the nested object. Here comes all the details concerning the request, don't hesitate to ask for more :) Thanks, Alex I'm trying to destroy a nested resources using the following route in router.resources :events, Orga::Events do |event| event.resources :locations, Orga::Locations end Which gives in jQuery request (delete_ method is a implementation of $.ajax with "DELETE"): $.delete_("/events/123/locations/456"); In the Location controller side, I've got: def delete(id) @location = Location.get(id) raise NotFound unless @location if @location.destroy redirect url(:orga_locations) else raise InternalServerError end end And the log: merb : worker (port 4000) ~ Routed to: {"format"=>nil, "event_id"=>"123", "action"=>"destroy", "id"=>"456", "controller"=>"letsmotiv/locations"} merb : worker (port 4000) ~ Params: {"format"=>nil, "event_id"=>"123", "action"=>"destroy", "id"=>"456", "controller"=>"letsmotiv/locations"} ~ (0.000025) SELECT `id`, `class_type`, `name`, `prefix`, `type`, `capacity`, `handicap`, `export_name` FROM `entities` WHERE (`class_type` IN ('Location') AND `id` = 456) ORDER BY `id` LIMIT 1 ~ (0.000014) SELECT `id`, `streetname`, `phone`, `lat`, `lng`, `country_region_city_id`, `location_id`, `organisation_id` FROM `country_region_city_addresses` WHERE `location_id` = 456 ORDER BY `id` LIMIT 1 merb : worker (port 4000) ~ Merb::ControllerExceptions::InternalServerError - (Merb::ControllerExceptions::InternalServerError)

    Read the article

  • RESTfully Nesting Resource Routes with Single Identifiers

    - by Craig Walker
    In my Rails app I have a fairly standard has_many relationship between two entities. A Foo has zero or more Bars; a Bar belongs to exactly one Foo. Both Foo and Bar are identified by a single integer ID value. These values are unique across all of their respective instances. Bar is existence dependent on Foo: it makes no sense to have a Bar without a Foo. There's two ways to RESTfully references instances of these classes. Given a Foo.id of "100" and a Bar.id of "200": Reference each Foo and Bar through their own "top-level" URL routes, like so: /foo/100 /bar/200 Reference Bar as a nested resource through its instance of Foo: /foo/100 /foo/100/bar/200 I like the nested routes in #2 as it more closely represents the actual dependency relationship between the entities. However, it does seem to involve a lot of extra work for very little gain. Assuming that I know about a particular Bar, I don't need to be told about a particular Foo; I can derive that from the Bar itself. In fact, I probably should be validating the routed Foo everywhere I go (so that you couldn't do /foo/150/bar/200, assuming Bar 200 is not assigned to Foo 150). Ultimately, I don't see what this brings me. So, are there any other arguments for or against these two routing schemes?

    Read the article

  • How could I refactor this into more manageable methods?

    - by ChaosPandion
    private static JsonStructure Parse(string jsonText, bool throwException) { var result = default(JsonStructure); var structureStack = new Stack<JsonStructure>(); var keyStack = new Stack<string>(); var current = default(JsonStructure); var currentState = ParserState.Begin; var invalidToken = false; var key = default(string); var value = default(object); foreach (var token in Lexer.Tokenize(jsonText)) { switch (currentState) { case ParserState.Begin: switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.OpenBrace: currentState = ParserState.ObjectKey; current = result = new JsonObject(); break; case TokenType.OpenBracket: currentState = ParserState.ArrayValue; current = result = new JsonArray(); break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; case ParserState.ObjectKey: switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.StringLiteral: currentState = ParserState.ColonSeperator; key = (string)token.Value; break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; case ParserState.ColonSeperator: switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.Colon: currentState = ParserState.ObjectValue; break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; case ParserState.ObjectValue: case ParserState.ArrayValue: switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.NumberLiteral: case TokenType.StringLiteral: case TokenType.BooleanLiteral: case TokenType.NullLiteral: currentState = ParserState.ItemEnd; value = token.Value; break; case TokenType.OpenBrace: structureStack.Push(current); keyStack.Push(key); currentState = ParserState.ObjectKey; current = new JsonObject(); break; case TokenType.OpenBracket: structureStack.Push(current); currentState = ParserState.ArrayValue; current = new JsonArray(); break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; case ParserState.ItemEnd: var jsonObject = (current as JsonObject); if (jsonObject != null) { jsonObject.Add(key, value); currentState = ParserState.ObjectKey; } var jsonArray = (current as JsonArray); if (jsonArray != null) { jsonArray.Add(value); currentState = ParserState.ArrayValue; } switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.CloseBrace: case TokenType.CloseBracket: currentState = ParserState.End; break; case TokenType.Comma: break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; case ParserState.End: switch (token.Type) { case TokenType.CloseBrace: case TokenType.CloseBracket: case TokenType.Comma: var previous = structureStack.Pop(); var previousJsonObject = (previous as JsonObject); if (previousJsonObject != null) { currentState = ParserState.ObjectKey; previousJsonObject.Add(keyStack.Pop(), current); } var previousJsonArray = (previous as JsonArray); if (previousJsonArray != null) { currentState = ParserState.ArrayValue; previousJsonArray.Add(current); } current = previous; if (token.Type != TokenType.Comma) { currentState = ParserState.End; } break; default: invalidToken = true; break; } break; default: break; } if (invalidToken) { if (throwException) { throw new JsonException(token); } return null; } } return result; }

    Read the article

  • Designing Web Service Using Ruby on Rails - Mapping ActiveRecord Models

    - by michaeldelorenzo
    I've put together a RoR application and would now like to publish a RESTful web service for interacting with my application. I'm not sure where to go exactly, I don't want to simply expose my ActiveRecord models since there is some data on each model that isn't needed or shouldn't be exposed via an API like this. I also don't want to create a SOAP solution. My application is built using Rails 2.3.5 and I hope to move to Rails 3.0 soon after its released. I'm basically looking for a way to map my ActiveRecord models to "models" that would be exposed via the web service. Is ActiveResource the correct thing to use? What about ActionWebService?

    Read the article

  • Should I stop redirecting after successful POST or PUT requests?

    - by Andres Jaan Tack
    It seems common in the Rails community, at least, to respond to successful POST, PUT or DELETE requests by redirecting instead of returning success. For instance, if I PUT a legal change to my user profile, the idiomatic response would be a 302 Redirect to the profile page. Isn't this wrong? Shouldn't we be returning 200 OK from the request? Or a 201 Created, in the case of a POST request? Either of those, in the HTTP/1.1 Status Definitions are allowed to (or required to) include a response, anyway. I guess I'm wondering, before I go and "fix" my application, whether there is there a darn good reason why the community has gone the way of redirects instead of successful responses.

    Read the article

  • How to handle JSON response using SBJSON iPhone?

    - by Jay Mehta
    I am receiving the below response from my web service? Can any one has idea how to handle it using SBJSON? { "match_details" : { "score" : 86-1 "over" : 1.1 "runrate" : 73.71 "team_name" : England "short_name" : ENG "extra_run" : 50 } "players" : { "key_0" : { "is_out" : 2 "runs" : 4 "balls" : 2 "four" : 1 "six" : 0 "batsman_name" : Ajmal Shahzad * "wicket_info" : not out } "key_1" : { "is_out" : 1 "runs" : 12 "balls" : 6 "four" : 2 "six" : 0 "batsman_name" : Andrew Strauss "wicket_info" : c. Kevin b.Kevin } "key_2" : { "is_out" : 2 "runs" : 20 "balls" : 7 "four" : 4 "six" : 0 "batsman_name" : Chris Tremlett * "wicket_info" : not out } } "fow" : { "0" : 40-1 } } I have done something like this:

    Read the article

  • How to loop through items in a js object?

    - by Blankman
    how can I loop through these items? var userCache = {}; userCache['john'] = {ID: 234, name: 'john', ... }; userCache['mary'] = {ID: 567, name: 'mary', ... }; userCache['douglas'] = {ID: 42, name: 'douglas', ... }; the length property doesn't work? userCache.length

    Read the article

  • Jersey (Jax-RS) & EL

    - by smeg4brains
    Hi there! im trying to get a controller to return a view through a Expression Language-Filter, but have no idea on how to get jersey to use EL for filtering a view. View with EL-tags: <html> <title>%{msg}</title> </html> Controller: @GET @Produces("text/html") public Response viewEventsAsHtml(){ String view=null; try { view=getViewAsString("events"); }catch(IOException e){ LOG.error("unable to load view from file",e); return null; } Response.ResponseBuilder builder=Response.ok(view, MediaType.TEXT_HTML); return builder.build(); } How would one go about in order to get the controller to replace the ${msg} part in the view by some arbitrary value?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157  | Next Page >