Search Results

Search found 7666 results on 307 pages for 'pointer to member'.

Page 150/307 | < Previous Page | 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157  | Next Page >

  • problems with 'free' in C

    - by lego69
    hello, can somebody please explain can I free const char* ? I allocated new memory using malloc and when I'm trying to free it I always receive an error incompatible pointer type thanks in advance something like this char* name="Arnold"; const char* str=malloc(stlen(name)+1); free(str); <- here bug

    Read the article

  • c++, when do you need/have to pass data as (*&)

    - by ra170
    I came across people passing data objects as: declaration: DataObject * data = 0; calling it as: SomeMethod( data ); definition of Somethod: void SomeMethod(SomeObject * & object) My obvious question is, when and why do you have to do this (& *)? Is it passing the pointer as reference?

    Read the article

  • How to set css to "label for="email""

    - by Kyle Sevenoaks
    Code: <label for="email">{t _your_email}:</label> CSS: label { display: block; width: 156px; cursor: pointer; padding-right: 6px; padding-bottom: 1px; } I want to make a new CSS for the email label as it's not meant to be that wide.. Just can't think right now :P Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Types in a struct in C

    - by drigoSkalWalker
    In this article : http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/macxhelp/v6v81/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.vacpp6m.doc/language/ref/clrc03defst.htm What's means the sentence "In C, a structure member may be of any type except "function returning T" (for some type T)" Thanks for all the answers!

    Read the article

  • how to access char*** from dll import in C#

    - by mavrick
    I have a function in win32 dll with signature as: void func1(int a, char*** outData) int a -- input parameter char*** outData -- output parameter - pointer to array of char strings Any idea how to access this in C# using dll import & what should be the signature.

    Read the article

  • merging indexed array in Python

    - by leon
    Suppose that I have two numpy arrays of the form x = [[1,2] [2,4] [3,6] [4,NaN] [5,10]] y = [[0,-5] [1,0] [2,5] [5,20] [6,25]] is there an efficient way to merge them such that I have xmy = [[0, NaN, -5 ] [1, 2, 0 ] [2, 4, 5 ] [3, 6, NaN] [4, NaN, NaN] [5, 10, 20 ] [6, NaN, 25 ] I can implement a simple function using search to find the index but this is not elegant and potentially inefficient for a lot of arrays and large dimensions. Any pointer is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Accessing char* after assigning its value C

    - by iSight
    Hi, I have assign the value of a member variable as under: myValue = (char*)malloc(strlen(inValue) * sizeof(char)); strcpy(mValue, inValue); while assigning it the value was proper as(taking printf output): http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema But, when i get its value after wards i get it as: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema(! What could be the problem for this issue

    Read the article

  • why can't I call methods on a for-yield expression?

    - by 1984isnotamanual
    Say I have some scala code like this: // outputs 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100 println( squares ) def squares = { val s = for ( count <- 1 to 10 ) yield { count * count } s.mkString(", "); } Why do I have to use the temporary val s? I tried this: def squares = for ( count <- 1 to 10 ) yield { count * count }.mkString(", ") That fails to compile with this error message: error: value mkString is not a member of Int def squares = for ( count <- 1 to 10 ) yield { count * count }.mkString(", ") Shouldn't mkString be called on the collection returned by the for loop?

    Read the article

  • WinCheat / WinSpy-like tool for C++ Builder exes

    - by mawg
    I just came back to C++ Builder after 5 or more years away. I seem to remember a nice tool where I could drag its pointer over the GUI of my running application and get lots of info about what was pointed at - handle, size, text, parent, children, etc IIRC, if the exe include debug info I could also get the actual variable name as used in the source. Does anyone know what program I am talking about? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Can I Have Polymorphic Containers With Value Semantics in C++11?

    - by John Dibling
    This is a sequel to a related post which asked the eternal question: Can I have polymorphic containers with value semantics in C++? The question was asked slightly incorrectly. It should have been more like: Can I have STL containers of a base type stored by-value in which the elements exhibit polymorphic behavior? If you are asking the question in terms of C++, the answer is "no." At some point, you will slice objects stored by-value. Now I ask the question again, but strictly in terms of C++11. With the changes to the language and the standard libraries, is it now possible to store polymorphic objects by value in an STL container? I'm well aware of the possibility of storing a smart pointer to the base class in the container -- this is not what I'm looking for, as I'm trying to construct objects on the stack without using new. Consider if you will (from the linked post) as basic C++ example: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Parent { public: Parent() : parent_mem(1) {} virtual void write() { cout << "Parent: " << parent_mem << endl; } int parent_mem; }; class Child : public Parent { public: Child() : child_mem(2) { parent_mem = 2; } void write() { cout << "Child: " << parent_mem << ", " << child_mem << endl; } int child_mem; }; int main(int, char**) { // I can have a polymorphic container with pointer semantics vector<Parent*> pointerVec; pointerVec.push_back(new Parent()); pointerVec.push_back(new Child()); pointerVec[0]->write(); pointerVec[1]->write(); // Output: // // Parent: 1 // Child: 2, 2 // But I can't do it with value semantics vector<Parent> valueVec; valueVec.push_back(Parent()); valueVec.push_back(Child()); // gets turned into a Parent object :( valueVec[0].write(); valueVec[1].write(); // Output: // // Parent: 1 // Parent: 2 }

    Read the article

  • Why can't I make my parameter like this?

    - by mystify
    - (void)setPropertyValue:(const *void)inValue forID:(UInt32)propertyID { } The compiler doesn't like the const *void, for some reason. When I have that, it says: error: expected ')' before 'void' When I make the parameter like (UInt32)foo there is no problem. Does const *void only work in functions? I need a parameter which can be a "pointer to anything" like UInt32, Float64, etc.

    Read the article

  • Using two threads and controlling one from the other in java?

    - by sidra
    Can someone please help me out. I need to use two threads in a way that one thread will run permanently while(true) and will keep track of a positioning pointer (some random value coming in form a method). This thread has a logic, if the value equals something, it should start the new thread. And if the value does not equal it should stop the other thread. Can someone give me some code snippet (block level) about how to realize this?

    Read the article

  • Why is T() = T() allowed in C++?

    - by Rimo
    I believe the expression T() creates an rvalue (by the Standard) However the following code compiles (at least on gcc4.0) class T {... }; int main() { T() = T(); } I know technically this is possible because member functions can be invoked on temporaries and the above is just invoking the operator= on the r-value temporary created from T(). But conceptually this is like assigning a new value to an r-value. Is there a good reason why this is allowed?

    Read the article

  • Including a C header which declares a variable called "new"?

    - by StackedCrooked
    I'm trying to use the OpenCA library in a C++ application. However, when including the file pki_x509_data_st.h the following code fragment is encountered: typedef struct pki_x509_callbacks_st { /* ---------------- Memory Management -------------------- */ void * (*new) (void ); void (*free) (void *x ); void * (*dup) (void *x ); This won't compile because of the "new" pointer declaration. How can I make it work?

    Read the article

  • How to interpret binary data as an integer?

    - by StackedCrooked
    The codebase at work contains some code that looks roughly like this: #define DATA_LENGTH 64 u_int32 SmartKey::SerialNumber() { unsigned char data[DATA_LENGTH]; // ... initialized data buffer return *(u_int32*)data; } This code works correctly, but GCC gives the following warning: warning: dereferencing pointer ‘serialNumber’ does break strict-aliasing rules Can someone explain this warning? Is this code potentially dangerous? How can it be improved?

    Read the article

  • Perl, "closure" using Hash

    - by Mike
    I would like to have a subroutine as a member of a hash which is able to have access to other hash members. For example sub setup { %a = ( txt => "hello world", print_hello => sub { print ${txt}; }) return %a } my %obj = setup(); $obj{print_hello}; Ideally this would output "hello world"

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157  | Next Page >