Search Results

Search found 30884 results on 1236 pages for 'javascript module'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 152/1236 | < Previous Page | 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159  | Next Page >

  • Simple javascript problem in ie6 and ie7

    - by Jeff Lamb
    I have a very simple function that takes a list of comma separated (x,y) points and imports them into a graph. I have FF, Chrome and IE8 installed. I use IETester to test for IE6 and IE7. // Import Data this.Import = function(data) { alert("Data in: "+data); var d; // Make sure the first and the last are start/ending parenthesis if ( (data[0] != '(') || (data[data.length-1] != ')') ) { alert("After if: "+data[0]+" "+data[data.length-1]); return false; } ... In Chrome, FF and IE8, I don't see the "After if:" alert. In IE6 and IE7, I see the following two alerts: Data in: (52,16),(100,90) After if: undefined undefined The "Data in" alert matches in all browsers. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript: 'foo.value' not working in IE?

    - by pete
    Hi! A few hours ago, I was instructed how to style a specific textarea with JS. The following piece of code (thanks again, Mario Menger) works like a charm in Firefox but unfortunately nothing happens in Internet Explorer (7 tested only so far). var foo = document.getElementById('HCB_textarea'); var defaultText = 'Your message here'; foo.value = defaultText; foo.style.color = '#888'; foo.onfocus = function(){ foo.style.color = '#000'; if ( foo.value == defaultText ) { foo.value = ''; } }; foo.onblur = function(){ foo.style.color = '#888'; if ( foo.value == '' ) { foo.value = defaultText; } }; I've already tried to replace 'value' by 'innerHTML' (for IE only) but to no effect. Any suggestions? TIA

    Read the article

  • What does this javascript do?

    - by Rakesh Juyal
    I was adding recent videos gadget on my blog. In that widget i was supposed to add this line <script src="/feeds/posts/default?orderby=published&alt=json-in-script&callback=showrecentpostswiththumbs"> also, i added another script which was having the method showrecentpostswiththumbs [ used in callback ]. Please let me know what does above syntax do?

    Read the article

  • calling a function or communicating from one browser window to another using Jquery / javascript

    - by Shanon
    Hello, I am designing a web site that plays music. The music player itself will be in a separate window along with the now playing list. I want to be able to refresh the now playing list when a new song is added to it from the main window. Essentially I need to figure out how to communicate between the two windows. I was only able to find one plugin on line that defines the player page as a child of the main page but then this reference would be lost after the parent page i.e my main page was refreshed. So this was not very useful to me and I'm kinda lost atm. Any help is greatly appreciated PS: here is the link to that plugin (http://www.sfpeter.com/2008/03/13/communication-between-browser-windows-with-jquery-my-new-plugin/)

    Read the article

  • javascript Date.parse

    - by user121196
    Case One: new Date(Date.parse("Jul 8, 2005")); Output: Fri Jul 08 2005 00:00:00 GMT-0700 (PST) Case Two: new Date(Date.parse("2005-07-08")); Output: Thu Jul 07 2005 17:00:00 GMT-0700 (PST) Why is the second parse incorrect?

    Read the article

  • Javascript obfustication help

    - by Victor
    I need some help to understand how this code was obfusticated. The code is: <a id="suggest" href="#" ajaxify="/ajax/social_graph/invite_dialog.php?class=FanManager&amp;node_id=108463912505356" class=" profile_action actionspro_a" rel="dialog-post">Suggest to Friends</a> And the obfustication is: \x3c\x61\x20\x69\x64\x3d\x22\x73\x75\x67\x67\x65\x73\x74\x22\x20\x68\x72\x65\x66\x3d\x22\x23\x22\x20\x61\x6a\x61\x78\x69\x66\x79\x3d\x22\x2f\x61\x6a\x61\x78\x2f\x73\x6f\x63\x69\x61\x6c\x5f\x67\x72\x61\x70\x68\x2f\x69\x6e\x76\x69\x74\x65\x5f\x64\x69\x61\x6c\x6f\x67\x2e\x70\x68\x70\x3f\x63\x6c\x61\x73\x73\x3d\x46\x61\x6e\x4d\x61\x6e\x61\x67\x65\x72\x26\x61\x6d\x70\x3b\x6e\x6f\x64\x65\x5f\x69\x64\x3d\x31\x30\x38\x34\x36\x33\x39\x31\x32\x35\x30\x35\x33\x35\x36\x22\x20\x63\x6c\x61\x73\x73\x3d\x22\x20\x70\x72\x6f\x66\x69\x6c\x65\x5f\x61\x63\x74\x69\x6f\x6e\x20\x61\x63\x74\x69\x6f\x6e\x73\x70\x72\x6f\x5f\x61\x22\x20\x72\x65\x6c\x3d\x22\x64\x69\x61\x6c\x6f\x67\x2d\x70\x6f\x73\x74\x22\x3e\x53\x75\x67\x67\x65\x73\x74\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x46\x72\x69\x65\x6e\x64\x73\x3c\x2f\x61\x3e","\x73\x75\x67\x67\x65\x73\x74 Now I used unescape on the above obfusticated code to read it. What I want to know is what exactly was used to obfusticate the code like that? Basically, I need to customize the readable code to the same obfustication. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • javascript setTimeout() first argument: expression error

    - by Jonah
    function Timer() { this.initialTime = 0; this.timeStart = null; this.getTotalTime = function() { timeEnd = new Date(); diff = timeEnd.getTime() - this.timeStart.getTime(); return diff+this.initialTime; }; this.formatTime = function() { interval = new Date(this.getTotalTime()); return interval.getHours() + ":" + interval.getMinutes() + ":" + interval.getSeconds(); }; this.start = function() { this.timeStart = new Date(); setTimeout("this.updateTime()", 1000); }; this.updateTime = function() { alert(this.formatTime()); setTimeout("this.updateTime()", 1000); }; } timer = new Timer(); timer.start(); I am getting an error: this.updateTime is not a function Any ideas? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Javascript scope chain

    - by Geromey
    Hi, I am trying to optimize my program. I think I understand the basics of closure. I am confused about the scope chain though. I know that in general you want a low scope (to access variables quickly). Say I have the following object: var my_object = (function(){ //private variables var a_private = 0; return{ //public //public variables a_public : 1, //public methods some_public : function(){ debugger; alert(this.a_public); alert(a_private); }; }; })(); My understanding is that if I am in the some_public method I can access the private variables faster than the public ones. Is this correct? My confusion comes with the scope level of this. When the code is stopped at debugger, firebug shows the public variable inside the this keyword. The this word is not inside a scope level. How fast is accessing this? Right now I am storing any this.properties as another local variable to avoid accessing it multiple times. Thanks very much!

    Read the article

  • how to capture key repeats with javascript

    - by yamspog
    i have an asp.net form and an asp:textbox. i have a problem when the user presses and HOLDS a key down. the user selects the text box and then presses and holds '9' until the text box fills with 9s. Is there any way to detect this situation? Is there a way to stop key repeats when the key is held down?

    Read the article

  • Which method of creating javascript objects is better?

    - by Germaine
    I've seen objects defined in two different ways, which function similarly, but are, of course, fundamentally different. You can do it either like this: var myobject = {property: 'hello', act: function() { this.property += ' world'; }}; and like this: function myobject() { this.property = 'hello'; this.act = function() { this.property += 'world'; } } The second method could create objects like so var newobj = new myobject(); but you could do something similar using the first notation by making the object the return value of a function. The new keyword has the advantage of being able to pass parameters that can be used to initialize the properties of the object, but you could just as easily add an init function to the first kind of object. Just wondering if besides these two differences, if there was a fundamental difference that made one method definitely better than the other method.

    Read the article

  • Simple javascript string problem in ie6 and ie7

    - by Jeff Lamb
    I have a very simple function that takes a list of comma separated (x,y) points and imports them into a graph. I have FF, Chrome and IE8 installed. I use IETester to test for IE6 and IE7. // Import Data this.Import = function(data) { alert("Data in: "+data); var d; // Make sure the first and the last are start/ending parenthesis if ( (data[0] != '(') || (data[data.length-1] != ')') ) { alert("After if: "+data[0]+" "+data[data.length-1]); return false; } ... In Chrome, FF and IE8, I don't see the "After if:" alert. In IE6 and IE7, I see the following two alerts: Data in: (52,16),(100,90) After if: undefined undefined The "Data in" alert matches in all browsers. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Javascript callback and google maps api question

    - by es11
    I am using google maps api v3 and have an array of arrays object: MVCArray.<MVCArray.<LatLng>> I want to iterate over this. I see that MVCArray has a method forEach which uses a call back, but I have no idea how to use this (I haven't done much js). The api defines this method as follows: forEach(callback:function(*, number))) Could somebody please show me an example of how to use this given an MVCArray of MVCArrays?

    Read the article

  • JSON find in JavaScript

    - by zapping
    Is there a better way other than looping to find data in JSON? It's for edit and delete. for(var k in objJsonResp) { if (objJsonResp[k].txtId == id) { if (action == 'delete') { objJsonResp.splice(k,1); } else { objJsonResp[k] = newVal; } break; } } The data is arranged as list of maps. Like: [{id:value, pId:value, cId:value,...}, {id:value, pId:value, cId:value}, ...]

    Read the article

  • Javascript function call causes error

    - by Ankur
    I am trying to call a function "makeQuery" and it's not working, FireBug is telling me: missing ; before statement [Break on this error] makeQuery(this.id){\n I don't quite understand where it wants me to put the ";" $(".predicate").click(function () { makeQuery(this.id){ alert(this.id); } }); function makeQuery(value){ queryString = queryString+"val="+value+"&"; variables = variables+1; alert(queryString); alert(variables); }

    Read the article

  • Trouble with javascript subtraction

    - by rockinthesixstring
    I'm working on a simple subtraction problem, but unfortunately it keeps returning NaN Here is the function function subtraction(a, b) { var regexp = /[$][,]/g; a = a.replace(regexp, ""); b - b.replace(regexp, ""); var _a = parseFloat(a); var _b = parseFloat(b); return _a - _b; } And here is how I'm calling it. txtGoodWill.value = subtraction(txtSellingPrice.value, txtBalanceSheet.value); The numbers that get submitted to the function are ONLY Currency (IE: $2,000 or $20, etc) Now I know that I cannot subtract numbers with a $ or a ,, but I can't for the life of me figure out why they are getting evaluated in the equasion.

    Read the article

  • Strip tags (with tags inside attributes and nested tags) using javascript

    - by Kokizzu
    What the fastest (in performance) way to strip strings from tags, most solution i've tried that uses regexp not resulting correct values for tags inside attributes (yes, i know it's wrong), example test case: var str = "<div data-content='yo! press this: <br/> <button type=\"button\"><i class=\"glyphicon glyphicon-disk\"></i> Save</button>' data-title='<div>this one for tooltips <div>seriously</div></div>'> this is the real content<div> with another nested</div></div>" that should resulting: this is the real content with another nested

    Read the article

  • Javascript function push problem

    - by Stefan
    Hello i've following JS function. responseData:function(resp){ this.jsondata = eval('(' + resp + ')'); this.propList = []; for (var i = 0;i<this.jsondata.length;i++) { for (obj in this.jsondata[i]) { alert(obj); //shows the property name of obj this.propList.push({ obj : this.jsondata[i][obj] //insert only simple obj string }); } } return this.propList; } I want to insert in my propList the property name and the value, but instead inserting the property name this function inserts simple 'obj' as a string. What i'm doing wrong? greetings Stefan

    Read the article

  • Rhino and Javascript 1.8?

    - by Scott
    Is it possible to have Rhino use a newer implementation of JS than 1.7? Do we have to wait for mozilla to do this, or is there a community project that has taken the lead? Thanks.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159  | Next Page >