Search Results

Search found 38690 results on 1548 pages for 'try catch throw'.

Page 173/1548 | < Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >

  • Null reference for first memory address between 0 - 65535

    - by Terry
    I would like to understand a bit more about memory and I was unable to find it from Google, please forgive me if this is silly question. How come the following code, accessing memory address 0(and up to 65535) in C# would throw NullReferenceException byte* pointer = (byte*)0; byte test = *pointer; Thanks a lot in advance!

    Read the article

  • How to pass non-fatal warnings from a library

    - by wRAR
    A library function parses a file and returns an object. If a parser encounters unknown data, missing values etc., it shouldn't throw an exception and stop parsing (because this is not fatal), but there should be a way to pass information about these things to a caller (so that warnings can be displayed in the UI, for example). How can these warning be returned? I'm thinking of passing a callback function/object into the library, are there any other possible solutions?

    Read the article

  • .NET object creation and generations

    - by nimoraca
    Is there a way to tell the .NET to allocate a new object in generation 2 heap. I have a problem where I need to allocate approximately 200 MB of objects, do something with them, and throw them away. What happens here is that all the data gets copied two times (from gen0 to gen1 and then from gen1 to gen2).

    Read the article

  • Why is Matlab Stateflow 7.7 not throwing errors on undefined variables?

    - by Pyrolistical
    Previously in Matlab Stateflow 7.1 all variables and functions had to be included before they can be referred to in the state diagram or else it would throw an error when you tried to parse the diagram. But now in 7.7 it doesn't catch those kinds of errors. Its still compiling the diagram because it catches other syntactic errors. Am I missing an option somewhere? Can this be turned on?

    Read the article

  • .Net Frameworks Initialization Error

    - by mahesh
    I have develop application on VS-2005 and installed it at another machine and along with application I have installed .net frameworks 2.0 version as per demand and it works well at time of installed and after some time if I try to open it it’s throw error like “ .Net Framework Initialization Error, Unable to find a version of the runtime to run this application. Client Machine : Operating System is XP sp2 How to overcome from it?.

    Read the article

  • Why does this compile?

    - by akf
    I was taken aback earlier today when debugging some code to find that something like the following does not throw a compile-time exception: public Test () { HashMap map = (HashMap) getList(); } private List getList(){ return new ArrayList(); } As you can imagine, a ClassCastException is thrown at runtime, but can someone explain why the casting of a List to a HashMap is considered legal at compile time?

    Read the article

  • C++: Why does gcc prefer non-const over const when accessing operator[]?

    - by JonasW
    This question might be more appropriately asked regarding C++ in general, but as I am using gcc on linux that's the context. Consider the following program: #include <iostream> #include <map> #include <string> using namespace std; template <typename TKey, typename TValue> class Dictionary{ public: map<TKey, TValue> internal; TValue & operator[](TKey const & key) { cout << "operator[] with key " << key << " called " << endl; return internal[key]; } TValue const & operator[](TKey const & key) const { cout << "operator[] const with key " << key << " called " << endl; return internal.at(key); } }; int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { Dictionary<string, string> dict; dict["1"] = "one"; cout << "first one: " << dict["1"] << endl; return 0; } When executing the program, the output is: operator[] with key 1 called operator[] with key 1 called first one: one What I would like is to have the compiler choose the operator[]const method instead in the second call. The reason is that without having used dict["1"] before, the call to operator[] causes the internal map to create the data that does not exist, even if the only thing I wanted was to do some debugging output, which of course is a fatal application error. The behaviour I am looking for would be something like the C# index operator which has a get and a set operation and where you could throw an exception if the getter tries to access something that doesn't exist: class MyDictionary<TKey, TVal> { private Dictionary<TKey, TVal> dict = new Dictionary<TKey, TVal>(); public TVal this[TKey idx] { get { if(!dict.ContainsKey(idx)) throw KeyNotFoundException("..."); return dict[idx]; } set { dict[idx] = value; } } } Thus, I wonder why the gcc prefers the non-const call over the const call when non-const access is not required.

    Read the article

  • Firefox engine library

    - by martin.malek
    Hi, I'm now using AxWebBrowser component to get DOM from web page and find used styles on each element. Unfortunatelly this is not working perfectly and some elements doesn't return correct data. I'm thinking about if it's possible to use engine from firefox? Is there some dll library I can use, navigate to the page and go throw DOM of the page?

    Read the article

  • database transaction rollback processing in PHP

    - by user198729
    try { $con->beginTransaction(); $this->doSave($con); $con->commit(); } catch (Exception $e) { $con->rollBack(); throw $e; } The code above is quite standard an approach to deal with transactions, but my question is:what if $con->rollBack() also fails? It may cause db lock,right?If so,what's the perfect way to go?

    Read the article

  • sessionFactory already exist

    - by senzacionale
    Can someone advice me how to prevent this error. SessionFactory already exist? sessionFactory = cfg.BuildSessionFactory(); if (sessionFactory == null) { throw new InvalidOperationException("cfg.BuildSessionFactory() returned null."); } if (sessionFactoryConfigPath != null) sessionFactories.Add(sessionFactoryConfigPath, sessionFactory);

    Read the article

  • Data Annotations validation Built into model

    - by Josh
    I want to build an object model that automatically wires in validation when I attempt to save an object. I am using DataAnnotations for my validation, and it all works well, but I think my inheritance is whacked. I am looking here for some guidance on a better way to wire in my validation. So, to build in validation I have this interface public interface IValidatable { bool IsValid { get; } ValidationResponse ValidationResults { get; } void Validate(); } Then, I have a base class that all my objects inherit from. I did a class because I wanted to wire in the validation calls automatically. The issue is that the validation has to know the type of the class is it validating. So I use Generics like so. public class CoreObjectBase<T> : IValidatable where T : CoreObjectBase<T> { #region IValidatable Members public virtual bool IsValid { get { // First, check rules that always apply to this type var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); // return false if any violations occurred return !result.HasViolations; } } public virtual ValidationResponse ValidationResults { get { var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); return result; } } public virtual void Validate() { // First, check rules that always apply to this type var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); // throw error if any violations were detected if (result.HasViolations) throw new RulesException(result.Errors); } #endregion } So, I have this circular inheritance statement. My classes look like this then: public class MyClass : CoreObjectBase<MyClass> { } But the problem occurs when I have a more complicated model. Because I can only inherit from one class, when I have a situation where inheritance makes sense I believe the child classes won't have validation on their properties. public class Parent : CoreObjectBase<Parent> { //properties validated } public class Child : Parent { //properties not validated? } I haven't really tested the validation in these cases yet, but I am pretty sure that anything in child with a data annotation on it will not be automatically validated when I call Child.Validate(); due to the way the inheritance is configured. Is there a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • C# 4: how to in-line detect for nulls?

    - by Dr. Zim
    In C# 4, wasn't there a short cut for checking for null values like so: if( myobject?.myproperty?.myotherproperty?.value != null ) The value would return null and not throw an exception. Anyone have a link to how to use it or at least the syntax?

    Read the article

  • force warning in java

    - by Dustin Getz
    I'd like a mechanism to throw a compile-time warning manually. I'm using it to flag unfinished code so I can't possibly forget about it later. @Deprecated is close but warns at caller site, not at creation site. I'm using eclipse. Something like #Warning in C#.

    Read the article

  • Determining if an Activity exists on the current device?

    - by stormin986
    Is there a way to check and see if an Activity exists on your device? If I have a youtube video link I want to specify it open in the YouTube PlayerActivity. However, I don't want to crash if for some reason they don't have it. Is there a way to check and see if the activity exists? I don't think I can catch the runtime exception since startActivity() doesn't throw it.

    Read the article

  • Xerces conflicts string.h

    - by Velthune
    Compiling my program I have this error: /usr/include/xercesc/util/Compilers/GCCDefs.hpp:133:60: error: declaration of ‘int strcasecmp(const char*, const char*)’ has a different exception specifier /usr/include/string.h:536:12: error: from previous declaration ‘int strcasecmp(const char*, const char*) throw ()’ make: *** [src/test/VFTImageMaterial.o] Error 1 Any idea about this conflict with string.h?

    Read the article

  • Access COMPORT 1 through three different applications.

    - by Khushi
    Hi I have an SMS Appliaction, which receives the messages through GPS Modem and revert back through GPS Modem. The Modem is using COM1. Now, i need two more appliactions which can send messages through the same GPS Modem. I tried making a webservice which can access the COM1 to send data, but when i try to connect through webService, it throw an error saying, 'COM1 is already occupied, Access denied.'. Can anybody help me to connect through the modem in above scenario. Khushi

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180  | Next Page >