Search Results

Search found 21877 results on 876 pages for 'indicator message'.

Page 177/876 | < Previous Page | 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184  | Next Page >

  • Soap WSDL with Null

    - by Simon
    Hello, i need to specifi parametr of function witch is nullable. this dont work: <message name="SaveRequest"> <part name="serialNumber" nillable="true" type="xsd:int"/> </message> please any help is welcome! simon

    Read the article

  • Why does this C# event handler not respond to this event in this Silverlight application?

    - by Edward Tanguay
    Can anyone tell me why the following code successfully executes this event: OnLoadingComplete(this, null); but never executes this event handler? void initialDataLoader_OnLoadingComplete(object obj, DataLoaderArgs args) CODE: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Windows.Controls; using System.Diagnostics; namespace TestEvent22928 { public partial class MainPage : UserControl { public MainPage() { InitializeComponent(); DataLoader initialDataLoader = new DataLoader("initial"); initialDataLoader.RegisterText("test1", "http://test:111/testdata/test1.txt"); initialDataLoader.RegisterText("test2", "http://test:111/testdata/test2.txt"); initialDataLoader.BeginLoading(); initialDataLoader.OnLoadingComplete += new DataLoader.LoadingComplete(initialDataLoader_OnLoadingComplete); } void initialDataLoader_OnLoadingComplete(object obj, DataLoaderArgs args) { Debug.WriteLine("loading complete"); //WHY DOES EXECUTION NEVER GET HERE? } } public class DataManager { public DataLoader CreateDataloader(string dataloaderIdCode) { DataLoader dataLoader = new DataLoader(dataloaderIdCode); return dataLoader; } } public class DataLoader { public string IdCode { get; set; } public List<DataItem> DataItems { get; set; } public delegate void LoadingComplete(object obj, DataLoaderArgs args); public event LoadingComplete OnLoadingComplete = delegate { }; private int dataItemCurrentlyLoadingIndex; public DataLoader(string idCode) { IdCode = idCode; DataItems = new List<DataItem>(); dataItemCurrentlyLoadingIndex = -1; } public void RegisterText(string idCode, string absoluteSourceUrl) { DataItem dataItem = new DataItem { IdCode = idCode, AbsoluteSourceUrl = absoluteSourceUrl, Kind = DataItemKind.Text }; DataItems.Add(dataItem); } public void BeginLoading() { LoadNext(); } private void LoadNext() { dataItemCurrentlyLoadingIndex++; if (dataItemCurrentlyLoadingIndex < DataItems.Count()) { DataItem dataItem = DataItems[dataItemCurrentlyLoadingIndex]; Debug.WriteLine("loading " + dataItem.IdCode + "..."); LoadNext(); } else { OnLoadingComplete(this, null); //EXECUTION GETS HERE } } } public class DataItem { public string IdCode { get; set; } public string AbsoluteSourceUrl { get; set; } public DataItemKind Kind { get; set; } public object DataObject { get; set; } } public enum DataItemKind { Text, Image } public class DataLoaderArgs : EventArgs { public string Message { get; set; } public DataItem DataItem { get; set; } public DataLoaderArgs(string message, DataItem dataItem) { Message = message; DataItem = dataItem; } } }

    Read the article

  • WCF .Net 4.0 is treating WebProtocolException as an unhandled exception

    - by Benjii
    Im trying to build an API using WCF and .Net 4, however when I throw the WebProtocolException, it is not displaying a nice error message like it should, instead it is treating it like an unhandled exception. I am using the WebServiceHost2Factory. Has anyone else used WebProtocolException with .net 4? An example of my call is below throw new WebProtocolException(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "The DateFrom parameter is invalid", new Error() { Code = 6002, Message = "Please ensure your dates are in the following format: yyyy/MM/dd hh:mm:ss" }, null, null);

    Read the article

  • Writing to Socket outputStream w/o closing it

    - by Eyal
    Hi, I'd like to write some messages to the server. Each time, for the tramsmitting only, I'm closing the outputStream and reopen it when I have to send the next message. os.write(msgBytes); os.write("\r\n".getBytes()); os.flush(); os.close(); How Can I keep this Socket's OutputStream, os, open and still be able to send the message? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to exit SW quickly

    - by Yigang Wu
    I have a SW which reside in external HDD, it will run automatically when user plug external HDD, of course, the SW have to close automatically when user unplug the external HDD. I can receive the device lost message, however my SW will not be respond druing releasing all objects, if I call exit(0) directly, the SW will show a crash message. Is there any way to quickly exit SW?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Binding - Duplicated Messages

    - by Rodrigo Gama
    I'm using ASP.NET MVC Binding Framework. Let's say I have a class Item, that has a mandatory field Id. I am binding a List, and do not want one error message for each element in this list. If more then one error happen when binding the Id field, I want only one message to be added to ModelState and shown to the user. In one sentence: Is there a way to avoid duplicated messages using ASP.NET MVC Binding Framework?

    Read the article

  • Pass object using JSON

    - by Pankaj
    Hello All right now i am using Json for passing status and message like return Json(new { Success = true, Message = "Save successfully" }); Project model=new Project() Is there any way, i can send model in json also? I am using c# and asp.net mvc

    Read the article

  • Safely get rid of "You have new mail in /var/mail" on a Mac?

    - by viatropos
    I was messing around with sendmail in Rails a year ago and have had this message popping up in the terminal after every command ever since: You have new mail in /var/mail/Lance How do I properly get rid of that so the message goes away? I ever use any of that functionality and don't have mail on my computer. There's one file in /var/mail called lance, and it's huge. Can I just remove it?

    Read the article

  • Is factory method proper design for my problem?

    - by metdos
    Hello Everyone, here is my problem and I'm considering to use factory method in C++, what are your opinions ? There are a Base Class and a lot of Subclasses. I need to transfer objects on network via TCP. I will create objects in first side, and using this object I will create a byte array TCP message, and send it to other side. On the other side I will decompose TCP message, I will create object and I will add this object to a polymorphic queue.

    Read the article

  • Method interception in PHP 5.*

    - by Rolf
    Hi everybody, I'm implementing a Log system for PHP, and I'm a bit stuck. All the configuration is defined in an XML file, that declares every method to be logged. XML is well parsed and converted into a multidimensionnal array (classname = array of methods). So far, so good. Let's take a simple example: #A.php class A { public function foo($bar) { echo ' // Hello there !'; } public function bar($foo) { echo " $ù$ùmezf$z !"; } } #B.php class B { public function far($boo) { echo $boo; } } Now, let's say I've this configuration file: <interceptor> <methods class="__CLASS_DIR__A.php"> <method name="foo"> <log-level>INFO</log-level> <log-message>Transaction init</log-message> </method> </methods> <methods class="__CLASS_DIR__B.php"> <method name="far"> <log-level>DEBUG</log-level> <log-message>Useless</log-message> </method> </methods> </interceptor> The thing I'd like AT RUNTIME ONLY (once the XML parser has done his job) is: #Logger.php (its definitely NOT a final version) -- generated by the XML parser class Logger { public function __call($name,$args) { $log_level = args[0]; $args = array_slice($args,1); switch($method_name) { case 'foo': case 'far': //case ..... //write in log files break; } //THEN, RELAY THE CALL TO THE INITIAL METHOD } } #"dynamic" A.php class A extends Logger { public function foo($log_level, $bar) { echo ' // Hello there !'; } public function bar($foo) { echo " $ù$ùmezf$z !"; } } #"dynamic" B.php class B extends Logger { public function far($log_level, $boo) { echo $boo; } } The big challenge here is to transform A and B into their "dynamic" versions, once the XML parser has completed its job. The ideal would be to achieve that without modifying the code of A and B at all (I mean, in the files) - or at least find a way to come back to their original versions once the program is finished. To be clear, I wanna find the most proper way to intercept method calls in PHP. What are your ideas about it ??? Thanks in advance, Rolf

    Read the article

  • using Linq to partition data into arrays

    - by user200295
    I have an array of elements where the element has a Flagged boolean value. 1 flagged 2 not flagged 3 not flagged 4 flagged 5 not flagged 6 not flagged 7 not flagged 8 flagged 9 not flagged I want to break it into arrays based on the flagged indicator output array 1 {1,2,3} array 2 {4,5,6,7} array 3 {8,9}

    Read the article

  • Spring's JMS Design Question : Decouple processing of messages

    - by java_pill
    I'm using a message listener to process some messages from MQ based on Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer. After I receive a message, I have to make a Web Service (WS) call. However, I don't want to do this in the onMessage method because it would block the onMessage method until the invocation of WS is successful and this introduces latency in dequeuing of messages from the queue. How can I decouple the invocation of the Web Service by calling it outside of the onMesage method or without impacting the dequeuing of messages? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • How do access a secure website within a sharepoint webpart?

    - by Bill
    How do access a secure website within a sharepoint webpart? The following code works fine as a console application but if you run it in a webpart, you will get a access violation WebRequest request = WebRequest.Create("https://somesecuresite.com"); WebResponse firstResponse = null; try { firstResponse = request.GetResponse(); } catch (WebException ex) { writer.WriteLine("Error: " + ex.ToString()); return; } if you access a non secure site, it also works. Any ideas? Error: System.Net.WebException: The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive. --- System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at System.Net.UnsafeNclNativeMethods.NativePKI.CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy(IntPtr policy, SafeFreeCertChain chainContext, ChainPolicyParameter& cpp, ChainPolicyStatus& ps) at System.Net.PolicyWrapper.VerifyChainPolicy(SafeFreeCertChain chainContext, ChainPolicyParameter& cpp) at System.Net.Security.SecureChannel.VerifyRemoteCertificate(RemoteCertValidationCallback remoteCertValidationCallback) at System.Net.Security.SslState.CompleteHandshake() at System.Net.Security.SslState.CheckCompletionBeforeNextReceive(ProtocolToken message, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendBlob(Byte[] incoming, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ProcessReceivedBlob(Byte[] buffer, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReadFrame(Byte[] buffer, Int32 readBytes, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReceiveBlob(Byte[] buffer, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.CheckCompletionBeforeNextReceive(ProtocolToken message, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendBlob(Byte[] incoming, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ProcessReceivedBlob(Byte[] buffer, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReadFrame(Byte[] buffer, Int32 readBytes, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReceiveBlob(Byte[] buffer, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.CheckCompletionBeforeNextReceive(ProtocolToken message, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendBlob(Byte[] incoming, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ProcessReceivedBlob(Byte[] buffer, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReadFrame(Byte[] buffer, Int32 readBytes, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartReceiveBlob(Byte[] buffer, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.CheckCompletionBeforeNextReceive(ProtocolToken message, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendBlob(Byte[] incoming, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ForceAuthentication(Boolean receiveFirst, Byte[] buffer, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ProcessAuthentication(LazyAsyncResult lazyResult) at System.Net.TlsStream.CallProcessAuthentication(Object state) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.runTryCode(Object userData) at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeHelpers.ExecuteCodeWithGuaranteedCleanup(TryCode code, CleanupCode backoutCode, Object userData) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state) at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state) at System.Net.TlsStream.ProcessAuthentication(LazyAsyncResult result) at System.Net.TlsStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size) at System.Net.PooledStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size) at System.Net.ConnectStream.WriteHeaders(Boolean async) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()

    Read the article

  • Why is the software world full of status codes?

    - by David V McKay
    Why did programmers ever start using status codes? I mean, I guess I could imagine this might be useful back in the days when a text string was an expensive resource. WAYYY back then. But even after we had megabytes of memory to work with, we continued to use them. What possible advantage could there be for obfuscating the meaning of an error message or status message behind a status code?

    Read the article

  • RMIServer running exception

    - by Mayan Alagar Pandi
    hi, Why this exception happened for RNI Server running. 2java.rmi.server.ExportException: remote object implements illegal remote interf ace; nested exception is: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: illegal remote method encountered: p ublic abstract java.lang.String RmiServerInterface.message() where message() is remote method. Regards, Alagar

    Read the article

  • Flex AdvancedDatagrid inline commentary functionality required

    - by Forkrul Assail
    I'm using Flex's Advanced Datagrid for a project and need inline comments, in a similar style to Excel spreadsheet comments. A little visual indicator should indicate if a field is associated with a comment, and on clicking on the element should open or trigger an action for displaying that particular comment. Any suggestions on how I would go about implementing this?

    Read the article

  • Setting the default value of a C# Optional Parameter

    - by Jaxidian
    Whenever I attempt to set the default value of an optional parameter to something in a resource file, I get a compile-time error of Default parameter value for 'message' must be a compile-time constant. Is there any way that I can change how the resource files work to make this possible? public void ValidationError(string fieldName, string message = ValidationMessages.ContactNotFound) In this, ValidationMessages is a resource file.

    Read the article

  • hook_user not being called for 'login' operation

    - by Allain Lalonde
    I've read in the drupal documentation that hook_user should be invoked for the login operation. To test this I've added a call to drupal_set_message at the top of my modules hook implementation and the only message I'm receiving is a call with 'load' as the $op. I've confirmed that drupal_set_message can be called multiple times and it doesn't erase the previous message, so I'm confident that hook_user is only being invoked the one time. Any good reasons for why hook_user isn't being invoked with 'login' as an operation when I'm logging in?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184  | Next Page >