Search Results

Search found 33538 results on 1342 pages for 'select query'.

Page 198/1342 | < Previous Page | 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205  | Next Page >

  • how to get latest entry from a table for an item and do arithmatic operation on it?

    - by I Like PHP
    i have below tables tbl_rcv_items st_id | item_id |stock_opening_qnty |stock_received_qnty |stock_rcvd_date 14 1 0 70 2010-05-18 15 16 0 100 2010-05-06 16 10 0 59 2010-05-20 17 14 0 34 2010-05-20 20 1 70 5 2010-05-12 tbl_issu_items issue_id refer_issue_id item_id item_qntt item_updated 51 1 1 5 2010-05-18 19:34:29 52 1 16 6 2010-05-18 19:34:29 53 1 10 7 2010-05-18 19:34:29 54 1 14 8 2010-05-18 19:34:29 75 7 1 12 2010-05-18 19:40:52 76 7 16 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 77 7 10 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 78 7 14 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 79 8 1 3 2010-05-19 11:28:50 80 8 16 5 2010-05-19 11:28:50 81 8 10 6 2010-05-19 11:28:50 82 8 14 7 2010-05-19 11:28:51 87 10 1 2 2010-05-19 12:51:03 88 10 16 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 89 10 10 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 90 10 14 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 91 14 1 1 2010-05-19 18:43:58 92 14 14 3 2010-05-19 18:43:58 tbl_item_detail item_id item_name 1 shirt 2 belt 10 ball pen 14 vim powder 16 pant NOW if i want total available quantity for each item till today using both table total available quantity for an item =stock_opening_qnty+stock_received_qnty(LATEST ENTRY FROM (tbl_rcv_item) for that item id according to stock_rcvd_date) - SUM(item_qntt) for eg: if i want to know the available quantity for item_id=1 till today(25-05-2010) then it shoud be 70+5(latest entry for item_id till 25/5/2010)-23( issued till 25/5/2010)=52 i write below query , SELECT tri.item_id, tid.item_name, (tri.stock_opening_qnty + tri.stock_received_qnty) AS totalRcvQntt, SUM( tii.item_qntt ) AS totalIsudQntt FROM tbl_rcv_items tri JOIN tbl_issu_items tii ON tii.item_id = tri.item_id JOIN tbl_item_detail tid ON tid.item_id=tri.item_id WHERE tri.stock_rcvd_date <= CURDATE() GROUP BY (tri.item_id) which results Array ( [0] => Array ( [item_id] => 1 [item_name] => shirt [totalRcvQntt] => 70 [totalIsudQntt] => 46 ) [1] => Array ( [item_id] => 10 [item_name] => ball pen [totalRcvQntt] => 59 [totalIsudQntt] => 16 ) [2] => Array ( [item_id] => 14 [item_name] => vim powder [totalRcvQntt] => 34 [totalIsudQntt] => 20 ) [3] => Array ( [item_id] => 16 [item_name] => pant [totalRcvQntt] => 100 [totalIsudQntt] => 17 ) ) in above result total isuse quantity for shirt(item_id=1) shoube be 23 whereas results reflects 46 bcoz there are two row regrading item_id=1 in tbl_rcv_items, i only need the latest one(means which stock_rcvd_date is less than tommorow) please tell me where i doing mistake?? or rewrite the best query. thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • SQL: GROUP BY after JOIN without overriding rows?

    - by krismeld
    I have a table of basketball leagues, a table af teams and a table of players like this: LEAGUES ID | NAME | ------------------ 1 | NBA | 2 | ABA | TEAMS: ID | NAME | LEAGUE_ID ------------------------------ 20 | BULLS | 1 21 | KNICKS | 2 PLAYERS: ID | TEAM_ID | FIRST_NAME | LAST_NAME | --------------------------------------------- 1 | 21 | John | Starks | 2 | 21 | Patrick | Ewing | Given a League ID, I would like to retrieve all the players' names and their team ID from all the teams in that league, so I do this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 which returns: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 1 [first_name] => John [last_name] => Starks ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) + around 500 more objects... Since I will use this result to populate a dropdown menu for each team containing each team's list of players, I would like to group my result by team ID, so the loop to create these dropdowns will only have to cycle through each team ID instead of all 500+ players each time. But when I use the GROUP BY like this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 GROUP BY t.id it only returns one player from each team like this, overriding all the other players on the same team because of the use of the same column names. [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 22 [player_id] => 31 [first_name] => Shawn [last_name] => Kemp ) etc... I would like to return something like this: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 2 [player_id1] => 1 [first_name1] => John [last_name1] => Starks [player_id2] => 2 [first_name2] => Patrick [last_name2] => Ewing +10 more players from this team... ) +25 more teams... Is it possible somehow?

    Read the article

  • How do I perform 'WHERE' on groups of rows?

    - by Drew
    I have a table, which looks like: +-----------+----------+ + person_id + group_id + +-----------+----------+ + 1 + 10 + + 1 + 20 + + 1 + 30 + + 2 + 10 + + 2 + 20 + + 3 + 10 + +-----------+----------+ I need a query such that only person_ids with groups 10 AND 20 AND 30 are returned (only person_id: 1). I am not sure how to do this, as from what I can see it would require me to group the rows by person_id and then select the rows which contain all group_ids. I'm looking for something which will preserve the use of keys without resorting to string operations on group_concat() or such.

    Read the article

  • ignoring saturday and sunday

    - by bsandrabr
    I am pulling in all the records from my customer database(mysql) for the last ten days $offset1 =strtotime("-10 day"); $date3=date("Y-m-d",$offset1); SELECT * FROM customers WHERE date between '$date3' and '$date' AND customer.custid = '$custid' ORDER by date DESC I would like to leave out the dates falling on a saturday or sunday and would like to put this in my query rather than the php If you can help thanks

    Read the article

  • Ordering Wordpress posts by most recent comment

    - by James
    I'm wanting to order Wordpress posts by the most recent comment. To the best of my knowledge this isn't possible using the WP_Query object, and would require a custom $wpdb query, which I can easily write. However, I then don't know how to setup the loop to run off this object. Can anyone help?

    Read the article

  • Access: strange results with queries against MDB file

    - by Craig Johnston
    I am running the following SQL against an MDB file, a copy of which is located here: http://hotfile.com/dl/40641614/2353dfc/test.mdb.html (perfectly clean file, no macros or viruses) SELECT datediff("d", MAX(invoice.date), Now) As Date_Diff , MAX(invoice.date) AS max_invoice_date , customer.number AS customer_number FROM invoice INNER JOIN customer ON invoice.customer_number = customer.number GROUP BY customer.number If the the following was added: HAVING datediff("d", MAX(invoice.date), Now) > 365 would this simply exclude rows with Date_Diff <= 365? What should be the effect of the HAVING clause here?

    Read the article

  • How to output JOINed tables?

    - by ilhan
    $id=(int)$_GET["id"]; $result = mysql_query("SELECT questionstable.*, categorytable.name FROM questionstable INNER JOIN categorytable ON categorytable.id = questionstable.category WHERE id=$id"); $row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result); Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in C:\Program Files\EasyPHP-5.3.4.0\www\scsoru.php on line 33

    Read the article

  • Unknown column even thoug it exits

    - by george
    I have SELECT servisler.geo_location, servisler.ADRES_MERKEZ, servisler.ADRES_ILCE, servisler.ADRES_IL, servisler.FIRMA_UNVANI, servisler.ADRES_ISTEL, servisler.YETKILI_ADISOYADI, urun_gruplari.GRUP_ADI FROM servisler INNER JOIN urun_gruplari ON kullanici_cihaz.URUN_GRUP_NO= urun_gruplari.RECNO INNER JOIN kullanici ON kullanici.SERVIS_RECNO = servisler.RECNO INNER JOIN kullanici_cihaz ON kullanici.RECNO = kullanici_cihaz.KUL_RECNO AND kullanici_cihaz.URUN_GRUP_NO = urun_gruplari.RECNO where kullanici.kullanici = 'MAR.EDI.003' but it says [Err] 1054 - Unknown column 'kullanici_cihaz.URUN_GRUP_NO' in 'on clause' enen though the column exits. What is its problem? schema Server version: 5.1.33-community-log

    Read the article

  • How to match multiple field in mySQL

    - by Mint
    Im trying to match forum_id with several different forum_id's, something like forum_id = 5,7,12,43,63,78 I currently have this code: SELECT topic_title, topic_id, forum_id FROM $MYSQL_TOPIC WHERE topic_title LIKE '%%%s%%' AND forum_id = 5 LIMIT 50 (using mysql_real_escape_string and sprintf) I tried: forum_id = 5 OR 7 forum_id = 5|7 forum_id = 5 AND 7 forum_id = 5 & 7 But none of them will match them all and therefore search though them all.

    Read the article

  • mySQL search for a number in VARCHAR field

    - by sea_1987
    Hi There, I have a field in my database that contain comma seperated values these values are numbers, and I am trying to do a search and count the number of times that a number appears in that column throughout the column, $sql = "SELECT sector_id_csv, COUNT(sector_id_csv) as count FROM cv WHERE sector_id_csv LIKE '$sectorId'"; This seems slow and does not return any results, and I know the sector_id it is search exsists in the table.

    Read the article

  • Loading the last related record instantly for multiple parent records using Entity framework

    - by Guillaume Schuermans
    Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework for the problem described below? I am trying for our next release to come up with a performant way to show the placed orders for the logged on customer. Of course paging is always a good technique to use when a lot of data is available I would like to see an answer without any paging techniques. Here's the story: a customer places an order which gets an orderstatus = PENDING. Depending on some strategy we move that order up the chain in order to get it APPROVED. Every change of status is logged so we can see a trace for statusses and maybe even an extra line of comment per status which can provide some extra valuable information to whoever sees this order in an interface. So an Order is linked to a Customer. One order can have multiple orderstatusses stored in OrderStatusHistory. In my testscenario I am using a customer which has 100+ Orders each with about 5 records in the OrderStatusHistory-table. I would for now like to see all orders in one page not using paging where for each Order I show the last relevant Status and the extra comment (if there is any for this last status; both fields coming from OrderStatusHistory; the record with the highest Id for the given OrderId). There are multiple scenarios I have tried, but I would like to see any potential other solutions or comments on the things I have already tried. Trying to do Include() when getting Orders but this still results in multiple queries launched on the database. Each order triggers an extra query to the database to get all orderstatusses in the history table. So all statusses are queried here instead of just returning the last relevant one, plus 100 extra queries are launched for 100 orders. You can imagine the problem when there are 100000+ orders in the database. Having 2 computed columns on the database: LastStatus, LastStatusInformation and a regular Linq-Query which gets those columns which are available through the Entity-model. The problem with this approach is the fact that those computed columns are determined using a scalar function which can not be changed without removing the formula from the computed column, etc... In the end I am very familiar with SQL and Stored procedures, but since the rest of the data-layer uses Entity Framework I would like to stick to it as long as possible, even though I have my doubts about performance. Using the SQL approach I would write something like this: WITH cte (RN, OrderId, [Status], Information) AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY OrderId ORDER BY Id DESC), OrderId, [Status], Information FROM OrderStatus ) SELECT o.Id, cte.[Status], cte.Information AS StatusInformation, o.* FROM [Order] o INNER JOIN cte ON o.Id = cte.OrderId AND cte.RN = 1 WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId ORDER BY 1 DESC; which returns all orders for the customer with the statusinformation provided by the Common Table Expression. Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework?

    Read the article

  • Advanced count and join in Rails

    - by trobrock
    I am try to find the top n number of categories as they relate to articles, there is a habtm relationship set up between the two. This is the SQL I want to execute, but am unsure of how to do this with ActiveRecord, aside from using the find_by_sql method. is there any way of doing this with ActiveRecord methods: SELECT "categories".id, "categories".name, count("articles".id) as counter FROM "categories" JOIN "articles_categories" ON "articles_categories".category_id = "categories".id JOIN "articles" ON "articles".id = "articles_categories".article_id GROUP BY "categories".id ORDER BY counter DESC LIMIT 5;

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Ignore the timestamp attribute

    - by Nique
    I have a timestamp column in my database, and i use it for almost every field, but now, i just want to update the hit counter.. and i do not want to update the timestamp column with it. I use the timestamp field to see the last 'content' update. Not for every hit. Is it possible to let mysql stop updating the timestamp column for just one query?

    Read the article

  • Bynary string search on one field.

    - by CrazyJoe
    I have 300 boolean fields in one table, and im trying to do somithing like that: One string field: 10000010000100100100100100010001 Ha a simple way to do a simple search os this field like: select * from table where field xor "10000010000100100100000000010001" :) Help!!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205  | Next Page >