Search Results

Search found 54 results on 3 pages for 'froyo'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 2/3 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3  | Next Page >

  • Android 2.2 supportera Flash annonce le responsable de l'OS chez Google, qui répond également aux pr

    Mise à jour du 28/04/10 Android 2.2 supportera Flash C'est ce qu'annonce le responsable de l'OS chez Google, qui répond également à Steve Jobs et à ses propos sur Android L'ingénieur en charge du projet Android chez Google, Andy Rubin, vient d'accorder une interview au New York Times dans laquelle il annonce que Froyo (pour « Frozen Yourt » - nom de code de la prochaine version de l'OS mobile) assurera le « support total » ("full support") de Flash. Reste à savoir ce que ce « full support » recouvre : support d'une version Flash entière (différente de la version Lite généralement présente dans l'univers du développemen...

    Read the article

  • Jelly Bean équipe un terminal Android sur deux, vers la fin de la fragmentation de l'OS ?

    Jelly Bean équipe un terminal Android sur deux vers la fin de la fragmentation de l'OS ?Comme il est de coutume, Google vient de publier son baromètre mensuel à destination des développeurs Android.Jelly Bean, les versions cumulées les plus récentes du système d'exploitation mobile, continue à s'accaparer des parts au détriment des versions les plus anciennes (Froyo, Gingerbread).Concrètement, Jelly Bean (Android 4.1.x, 4.2.x et 4.3) équipe désormais plus de la moitié des terminaux Android, avec...

    Read the article

  • Android 3.0 : Flash Player 10.2 en bêta sur les tablettes à partir de vendredi, Adobe publie la liste des appareils mobiles concernés

    Android 3.0 : Flash Player 10.2 en bêta sur les tablettes à partir de vendredi prochain Adobe publie la liste des appareils mobiles concernés Mise à jour du 14/03/2011 La sortie de la deuxième version du lecteur Adobe Flash Player pour les mobiles est prévue pour le vendredi 18 mars prochain, mais il ne sera disponible ce jour-là qu'en version bêta pour les tablettes sous Android 3.0 alias Honeycomb. En revanche, Flash Player 10.2 sortira vendredi en version définitive sur l'Android Market pour Android 2.2 (Froyo) et 2.3 (Gingerbread) Cette disponibilité ne concerne toutefois qu'un nombre limité d'appareils mobil...

    Read the article

  • Weird camera Intent behavior

    - by David Erosa
    Hi all. I'm invoking the MediaStore.ACTION_IMAGE_CAPTURE intent with the MediaStore.EXTRA_OUTPUT extra so that it does save the image to that file. On the onActivityResult I can check that the image is being saved in the intended file, which is correct. The weird thing is that anyhow, the image is also saved in a file named something like "/sdcard/Pictures/Camera/1298041488657.jpg" (epoch time in which the image was taken). I've checked the Camera app source (froyo-release branch) and I'm almost sure that the code path is correct and wouldn't have to save the image, but I'm a noob and I'm not completly sure. AFAIK, the image saving process starts with this callback (comments are mine): private final class JpegPictureCallback implements PictureCallback { ... public void onPictureTaken(...){ ... // This is where the image is passed back to the invoking activity. mImageCapture.storeImage(jpegData, camera, mLocation); ... public void storeImage(final byte[] data, android.hardware.Camera camera, Location loc) { if (!mIsImageCaptureIntent) { // Am i an intent? int degree = storeImage(data, loc); // THIS SHOULD NOT BE CALLED WITHIN THE CAPTURE INTENT!! ....... // An finally: private int storeImage(byte[] data, Location loc) { try { long dateTaken = System.currentTimeMillis(); String title = createName(dateTaken); String filename = title + ".jpg"; // Eureka, timestamp filename! ... So, I'm receiving the correct data, but it's also being saved in the "storeImage(data, loc);" method call, which should not be called... It'd not be a problem if I could get the newly created filename from the intent result data, but I can't. When I found this out, I found about 20 image files from my tests that I didn't know were on my sdcard :) I'm getting this behavior both with my Nexus One with Froyo and my Huawei U8110 with Eclair. Could please anyone enlight me? Thanks a lot.

    Read the article

  • Any guidelines for handling the Headset and Bluetooth AVRC transport controls in Android 2.2

    - by StefanK
    I am trying to figure out what is the correct (new) approach for handling the Intent.ACTION_MEDIA_BUTTON in Froyo. In pre 2.2 days we had to register a BroadcastReceiver (either permanently or at run-time) and the Media Button events would arrive, as long as no other application intercepts them and aborts the broadcast. Froyo seems to still somewhat support that model (at least for the wired headset), but it also introduces the registerMediaButtonEventReceiver, and unregisterMediaButtonEventReceiver methods that seem to control the "transport focus" between applications. During my experiments, using registerMediaButtonEventReceiver does cause both the bluetooth and the wired headset button presses to be routed to the application's broadcast receiver (the app gets the "transport focus"), but it looks like any change in the audio routing (for example unplugging the headset) shits the focus back to the default media player. What is the logic behind the implementation in Android 2.2? What is correct way to handle transport controls? Do we have to detect the change in the audio routing and try to re-gain the focus? This is an issue that any 3rd party media player on the Android platform has to deal with, so I hope that somebody (probably a Google Engineer) can provide some guidelines that we can all follow. Having a standard approach may make headset button controls a bit more predictable for the end users. Stefan

    Read the article

  • Andriod 2.4 – IceCream – Comming…

    - by Boonei
    Take a deep breath before you read further, I am sure some of us are waiting for Gingerbread update in our mobile phones and most of us still are waiting even to get Froyo. Before we blink our eyes, you will be seeing the latest version of Android OS out soon, Android 2.4 aka Icecream. Its expected to be out in this June/July, so for sure we would get a spoon full on Google I/O comming this May. Stay Tuned……… Guess its better now a days to buy a “Pure-Android” phone. Else we would be waiting for ever to get the latest version on our phones. [Image Credit : D Sharon Pruitt, Available under Creative Commons] This article titled,Andriod 2.4 – IceCream – Comming…, was originally published at Tech Dreams. Grab our rss feed or fan us on Facebook to get updates from us.

    Read the article

  • Connectify like functionality on Ubuntu running on T61 - wifi 4965 AGN

    - by Vivek Sharma
    I would like to use my laptop as an Access point, so that i can connect my phones through Wifi. I have done this my office laptop T410. I am having T61 with wifi module 4965. Connectify on windows does not support it. I am following -- https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/WirelessAccessPoint to make achieve WAP capability on my T61 running ubuntu 10.10. The link says something about "master mode", how do i put my T61 wifi-inter4965 in master mode. Can i install madwifi or atheros drivers on it. I am using galaxy S froyo, and it does not support Ad-hoc network. Has anyone tired to achieve this.

    Read the article

  • Connectify-like functionality on 4965 AGN wireless?

    - by Vivek Sharma
    I would like to use my laptop as an Access point, so that i can connect my phones through Wifi. I have done this my office laptop T410. I am having T61 with wifi module 4965. Connectify on windows does not support it. I am following these instructions to make achieve WAP capability on my T61 running ubuntu 10.10. The link says something about "master mode", how do i put my T61 wifi-inter4965 in master mode. Can I install madwifi or atheros drivers on it? I am using galaxy S froyo, and it does not support Ad-hoc network. Has anyone tried to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • Flash rend la navigation instable sous Android 2.2, Apple a-t-il finalement raison de boycotter cett

    Flash rend la navigation instable sous Android 2.2, Apple a-t-il finalement raison de boycotter cette technologie ? Brian, journaliste pour PocketNow, vient de publier une vidéo dans laquelle il compare la navigation Internet de l'iPhone, du Nexus One et du HD2 d'HTC. Il surfe sur les mêmes sites web avec les trois smartphones, et compare leurs navigateurs. Sur le Nexus One, il a installé Froyo accompagné de la beta de Flash permettant de lire pratiquement tous les contenus Flash. Les images montrent que les jeux Flash tournant avec un bon processeur sont très proches des standards, écrits en natif. Cependant, alors que la vidéo avance, les choses changent. A 4min30, Flash devient plus agité lorsqu'il est sur une pag...

    Read the article

  • Android : plus de 61% des smartphones embarquent la version 2.2 et moins de 8% sont sur une version 1.x, fin de la fragmentation ?

    Android : plus de 61 % des smartphones embarquent la version 2.2 Et moins de 8% sont sur une version 1.x, la fin de la fragmentation ? Mise à jour du 18/03/11, par Hinault Romaric La version 2.2 est de « très » loin la plus utilisée par les terminaux tournant sur Android d'après l'analyse menée par Google sur les terminaux Android ayant accédé à l'Android Market au cours des deux premières semaines de mars 2011 (du 01 au 14). Actuellement, c'est un total de 61,3% de terminaux qui tournent sur la version 2.2 (Froyo) d'Android au détriment de la version 2.1 (Eclair) qui chute à moins de 30%. [IMG]http://rdonfack.dev...

    Read the article

  • Android 2.2 repéré sur le Net, la prochaine version de l'OS mobile de Google pourrait arriver offici

    Android 2.2 repéré sur le Net La prochaine version de l'OS mobile de Google pourrait arriver officiellement en mai "Froyo", nom de code de la future version d'Android, a été repéré sur le Net. Google serait donc en train de tester Android 2.2 en interne. C'est en tout cas ce que croit savoir Android and Me, un site spécialisé - entre autre - dans la mesure du trafic d'Android. [IMG]http://ftp-developpez.com/gordon-fowler/android22.png[/IMG] Cette nouvelle version proposera un compilateur JIT (pour Just In Time), une méthode qui permet la compilation en temps réel d'un code vers le code natif de l'appareil et de garder le résultat en ...

    Read the article

  • Android Market Publishing Issues

    - by Steve
    I have an app which I have just updated to froyo to take advantage of the move to SD card feature. I am now trying to upload the update to the market but I keep getting the following error: "The file is invalid: W/ResourceType( 7193): Bad string block: last string is not 0- terminated ERROR getting 'android:label' attribute: attribute is not a string value". I changed the value in the manifest from "android:label="@string/app_name" " to "android:label="test" " and uploaded it, then it started complaining about the icon, saying that it wasn't a string. Anyone have any ideas? The application part of my manifest is shown below and I'm properly confused. The app compiles into an APK, it even installs and runs fine on my N1 (installing from SD card) it just won't upload to the market. Any help would be greatly appreciated, I have absolutely no idea what's wrong, seems like I've tried everything I can think of including re-installing eclipse. Cheers Steve

    Read the article

  • android compilation

    - by user1241903
    I am trying to compile android source v2.3.4. When I give "make -j32", I am getting result like this.I am using fedora 14(32 bit). [root@localhost WORKING_DIRECTORY]# make -j32 ============================================ PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.4 TARGET_PRODUCT=full TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng TARGET_SIMULATOR=false TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release TARGET_BUILD_APPS= TARGET_ARCH=arm HOST_ARCH=x86 HOST_OS=linux HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release BUILD_ID=GRJ22 ============================================ Checking build tools versions... build/core/main.mk:76: ************************************************************ build/core/main.mk:77: You are attempting to build on a 32-bit system. build/core/main.mk:78: Only 64-bit build environments are supported beyond froyo/2.2. build/core/main.mk:79: ************************************************************ build/core/main.mk:80: *** stop. Stop. [root@localhost WORKING_DIRECTORY]# Please help me to solve this issue. How to compile android source code on 32 bit os?. Thank You Rajendra

    Read the article

  • Compiling error with API 10

    - by Suhel De Corser
    I was following the basic tutorials on developers.android.com and came by creating the activity named DisplayMessageActivity. It is a blank activity with all the specifications given as shown in the tutorial. FYI, I am using Min SDK = API 8, Target SDK = API 16, Compile with = API 10 The next thing is that there are two errors: "The method getActionBar() is undefined for the type DisplayMessageActivity "home cannot be resolved or is not a field" I tried changing the API to 14 which called for another problem, it wants the minimum API to be 11. That solves these problems, but the main problem is so many devices still use Gingerbread or maybe FroYo. Can't I write for them? Do I have to go higher? How to write for them?

    Read the article

  • Understanding memory leak in Android app.

    - by sat
    After going through few articles about performance, Not able to get this statement exactly. "When a Drawable is attached to a view, the view is set as a callback on the drawable" Soln: "Setting the stored drawables’ callbacks to null when the activity is destroyed." What does that mean, e.g. In my app , I initialize an imageButton in onCreate() like this, imgButton= (ImageButton) findViewById(R.id.imagebtn); At later stage, I get an image from an url, get the stream and convert that to drawable, and set image btn like this, imgButton.setImageDrawable(drawable); According to the above statement, when I am exiting my app, say in onDestroy() I have to set stored drawables’ callbacks to null, not able to understand this part ! In this simple case what I have to set as null ? I am using Android 2.2 Froyo, whether this technique is required, or not necessary.

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2007 with Android activesync

    - by lbanz
    A few of our users noticed that it will stop working intermittently for them. I didn't believe it at first until I changed my android phone and it started occuring for me. It will just stop syncing completely, it looks like the server is blocking the device completely. This mainly occurs when they are using the wifi. I've done some testing. If I switch off the wifi and use the phone data plan it will work fine. When it's on the wifi network, I try and browse to the webmail/owa page and it says page not found! I did a dns lookup and they resolve correctly. If I use another device on the same wifi network, it can access the exchange servers fine. Sometimes the wifi network will just work without any issues. But when it fails, it looks like the phone constantly checks the server every second to see if it is online even though I've got it on manual sync. I was wondering whether it tries to sync too many times and exchange thinks its a denial service attack. My old android phone that works is Froyo and the new one is Icecream. People who have reported issues seems to be newer phones. They also tested their own wifi network at home and experience the same problem. We haven't patch our exchange recently before seeing this problem. Anyone has seen this issue?

    Read the article

  • Android 2.2 and "Bad address family" on Socket Connect

    - by Josh
    I have a fairly simple game that works perfectly on every version now up through 2.1, but with the new 2.2 (Froyo) release I am unable to create a socket. I am using the mina package for nio, and get this exception: W/System.err( 263): java.net.SocketException: Bad address family W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSNetworkSystem.connectStreamWithTimeoutSocketImpl(Native Method) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSNetworkSystem.connect(OSNetworkSystem.java:115) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:272) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.PipeImpl$SinkChannelImpl.finishConnect(PipeImpl.java:164) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.PipeImpl.(PipeImpl.java:48) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.SelectorProviderImpl.openPipe(SelectorProviderImpl.java:51) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.SelectorImpl.(SelectorImpl.java:141) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.SelectorProviderImpl.openSelector(SelectorProviderImpl.java:58) W/System.err( 263): at java.nio.channels.Selector.open(Selector.java:48) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketConnector.startupWorker(SocketConnector.java:248) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketConnector.connect(SocketConnector.java:210) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketConnector.connect(SocketConnector.java:137) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.common.support.BaseIoConnector.connect(BaseIoConnector.java:40) Later in the log, usually immediately following I get this: W/System.err( 263): java.lang.NullPointerException W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.SelectorImpl.wakeup(SelectorImpl.java:418) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketConnector.connect(SocketConnector.java:222) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketConnector.connect(SocketConnector.java:137) W/System.err( 263): at org.apache.mina.common.support.BaseIoConnector.connect(BaseIoConnector.java:40) I have done all the googling and looking around I can think of and found nothing. The closest I have come seems to be an old JDK bug with ipv6 support on XP and Vista machines (I'm running Vista). Recommendations included disabling ipv6 (that did not work) and disabling ipv4 and leaving ipv6 (will not work for me as my router and ISP don't support it and so could not test anyway). Any thoughts, suggestions, things I have not tried? Thanks, Josh

    Read the article

  • Bluetooth DUN Tethering fails

    - by tacone
    I have an HTC Desire HD, with Android Froyo (2.2) and PDANet installed. I am using Ubuntu 10.10. I cannot tether it over Bluetooth either with Network Manager or BlueMan. (note, I installed Blueman only after failing with NetWork manager, and I even tried the last version from the PPA). With both my device is discovered, paired, setup. But connecting always fail. Network manager says it cannot get the details of my device Blueman says Connection Refused (111) Here are some relevant entries from syslog. Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2242]: Bluetooth deamon 4.69 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Starting SDP server Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Starting experimental netlink support Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Failed to find Bluetooth netlink family Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Failed to init netlink plugin Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.284357] Bluetooth: L2CAP ver 2.14 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.284361] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.446781] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.446784] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: HCI dev 0 registered Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.569481] Bluetooth: SCO (Voice Link) ver 0.6 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.569484] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: HCI dev 0 up Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Starting security manager 0 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: ioctl(HCIUNBLOCKADDR): Invalid argument (22) Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.818600] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.818607] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 158.818610] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11 Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: probe failed with driver input-headset for device /org/bluez/2242/hci0/dev_F8_DB_7F_AF_6B_EE Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Adapter /org/bluez/2242/hci0 has been enabled Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook pulseaudio[1757]: bluetooth-util.c: Error from ListDevices reply: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook NetworkManager[1247]: <warn> bluez error getting adapter properties: Rejected send message, 1 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.4" (uid=0 pid=1247 comm="NetworkManager) interface="org.bluez.Adapter" member="GetProperties" error name="(unset)" requested_reply=0 destination="org.bluez" (uid=0 pid=2242 comm="/usr/sbin/bluetoothd)) Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: return_link_keys (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=00:23:6C:C0:F1:B0) Mar 11 22:13:00 tacone-macbook pulseaudio[1757]: bluetooth-util.c: Error from GetProperties reply: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied Mar 11 22:15:02 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Discovery session 0x2262d7c0 with :1.45 activated Mar 11 22:15:15 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Stopping discovery Mar 11 22:15:15 tacone-macbook pulseaudio[1757]: bluetooth-util.c: Error from GetProperties reply: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied Mar 11 22:15:16 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: link_key_request (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:15:16 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: io_capa_request (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:15:17 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: io_capa_response (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:15:18 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Stopping discovery Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: link_key_notify (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE, type=5) Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 306.585725] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 306.630757] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Authentication requested Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: link_key_request (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 306.784829] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:15:28 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 306.857861] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:15:29 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: probe failed with driver input-headset for device /org/bluez/2242/hci0/dev_F8_DB_7F_AF_6B_EE Mar 11 22:15:29 tacone-macbook pulseaudio[1757]: bluetooth-util.c: Error from GetProperties reply: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied Mar 11 22:15:29 tacone-macbook pulseaudio[1757]: last message repeated 8 times Mar 11 22:15:29 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: Stopping discovery Mar 11 22:15:30 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (tty/rfcomm0): could not get port's parent device Mar 11 22:15:30 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (rfcomm0) opening serial device... Mar 11 22:15:30 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (rfcomm0): probe requested by plugin 'Generic' Mar 11 22:15:43 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (rfcomm0) closing serial device... Mar 11 22:15:43 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (rfcomm0) opening serial device... Mar 11 22:15:49 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (rfcomm0) closing serial device... Mar 11 22:16:15 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (tty/rfcomm0): could not get port's parent device Mar 11 22:16:19 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 357.375108] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: link_key_request (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 362.169506] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 362.215529] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook bluetoothd[2243]: link_key_request (sba=00:23:6C:B5:03:6F, dba=F8:DB:7F:AF:6B:EE) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 362.281559] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook kernel: [ 362.330588] l2cap_recv_acldata: Unexpected continuation frame (len 0) Mar 11 22:16:24 tacone-macbook modem-manager: (tty/rfcomm0): could not get port's parent device Any help ? PS: tethering via USB or WiFi is not an option, I need to do it over Bluetooth.

    Read the article

  • I, Android

    - by andrewbrust
    I’m just back from the 2011 Consumer Electronics Show (CES).  I go to CES to get a sense of what Microsoft is doing in the consumer space, and how people are reacting to it.  When I first went to CES 2 years ago, Steve Ballmer announced the beta of Windows 7 at his keynote address, and the crowd went wild.  When I went again last year, everyone was hoping for a Windows tablet announcement at the Ballmer keynote.  Although they didn’t get one (unless you count the unreleased HP Slate running Windows 7), people continued to show anticipation around Project Natal (which became Xbox 360 Kinect) and around Windows Phone 7.  On the show floor last year, there were machines everywhere running Windows 7, including lots of netbooks.  Microsoft had a serious influence at the show both years. But this year, one brand, one product, one operating system evidenced itself over and over again: Android.  Whether in the multitude of tablet devices that were shown across the show, or the burgeoning number of smartphones shown (including all four forthcoming 4G-LTE handsets at Verizon Wireless’ booth) or the Google TV set top box from Logitech and the embedded implementation in new Sony TV models, Android was was there. There was excitement in the ubiquity of Android 2.2 (Froyo) and the emergence of Android 2.3 (Gingerbread).  There was anticipation around the tablet-optimized Android 3.0 (Honeycomb).  There were highly customized skins.  There was even an official CES Android app for navigating the exhibit halls and planning events.  Android was so ubiquitous, in fact, that it became surprising to find a device that was running anything else.  It was as if Android had become the de facto Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) operating system. Motorola’s booth was nothing less than an Android showcase.  And it was large, and it was packed.  Clearly Moto’s fortunes have improved dramatically in the last year and change.  The fact that the company morphed from being a core Windows Mobile OEM to an Android poster child seems non-coincidental to their improved fortunes. Even erstwhile WinMo OEMs who now do produce Windows Phone 7 devices were not pushing them.  Perhaps I missed them, but I couldn’t find WP7 handsets at Samsung’s booth, nor at LG’s.  And since the only carrier exhibiting at the show was Verizon Wireless, which doesn’t yet have WP7 devices, this left Microsoft’s booth as the only place to see the phones. Why is Android so popular with consumer electronics manufacturers in Japan, South Korea, China and Taiwan?  Yes, it’s free, but there’s more to it than that.  Android seems to have succeeded as an OEM OS because it’s directed at OEMs who are permitted to personalize it and extend it, and it provides enough base usability and touch-friendliness that OEMs want it.  In the process, it has become a de facto standard (which makes OEMs want it even more), and has done so in a remarkably short time: the OS was launched on a single phone in the US just 2 1/4 years ago. Despite its success and popularity, Apple’s iOS would never be used by OEMs, because it’s not meant to be embedded and customized, but rather to provide a fully finished experience.  Ironically, Windows Phone 7 is likewise disqualified from such embedded use.  Windows Mobile (6.x and earlier) may have been a candidate had it not atrophied so much in its final 5 years of life. What can Microsoft do?  It could start by developing a true touch-centric OS for tablets, whether that be within Windows 8, or derived from Windows Phone 7.  It would then need to deconstruct that finished product into components, via a new or altered version of Windows Embedded or Windows Embedded Compact.  And if Microsoft went that far, it would only make sense to work with its OEMs and mobile carriers to make certain they showcase their products using the OS at CES, and other consumer electronics venues, prominently. Mostly though, Microsoft would need to decide if it were really committed to putting sustained time, effort and money into a commodity product, especially given the far greater financial return that it now derives from its core Windows and Office franchises. Microsoft would need to see an OEM OS for what it is: a loss leader that helps build brand and platform momentum for up-level products.  Is that enough to make the investment worthwhile?  One thing is certain: if that question is not acknowledged and answered honestly, then any investment will be squandered.

    Read the article

  • nginx: How can I set proxy_* directives only for matching URIs?

    - by Artem Russakovskii
    I've been at this for hours and I can't figure out a clean solution. Basically, I have an nginx proxy setup, which works really well, but I'd like to handle a few urls more manually. Specifically, there are 2-3 locations for which I'd like to set proxy_ignore_headers to Set-Cookie to force nginx to cache them (nginx doesn't cache responses with Set-Cookie as per http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpProxyModule#proxy_ignore_headers). So for these locations, all I'd like to do is set proxy_ignore_headers Set-Cookie; I've tried everything I could think of outside of setting up and duplicating every config value, but nothing works. I tried: Nesting location directives, hoping the inner location which matches on my files would just set this value and inherit the rest, but that wasn't the case - it seemed to ignore anything set in the outer location, most notably proxy_pass and I end up with a 404). Specifying the proxy_cache_valid directive in an if block that matches on $request_uri, but nginx complains that it's not allowed ("proxy_cache_valid" directive is not allowed here). Specifying a variable equal to "Set-Cookie" in an if block, and then trying to set proxy_cache_valid to that variable later, but nginx isn't allowing variables for this case and throws up. It should be so simple - modifying/appending a single directive for some requests, and yet I haven't been able to make nginx do that. What am I missing here? Is there at least a way to wrap common directives in a reusable block and have multiple location blocks refer to it, after adding their own unique bits? Thank you. Just for reference, the main location / block is included below, together with my failed proxy_ignore_headers directive for a specific URI. location / { # Setup var defaults set $no_cache ""; # If non GET/HEAD, don't cache & mark user as uncacheable for 1 second via cookie if ($request_method !~ ^(GET|HEAD)$) { set $no_cache "1"; } if ($http_user_agent ~* '(iphone|ipod|ipad|aspen|incognito|webmate|android|dream|cupcake|froyo|blackberry|webos|s8000|bada)') { set $mobile_request '1'; set $no_cache "1"; } # feed crawlers, don't want these to get stuck with a cached version, especially if it caches a 302 back to themselves (infinite loop) if ($http_user_agent ~* '(FeedBurner|FeedValidator|MediafedMetrics)') { set $no_cache "1"; } # Drop no cache cookie if need be # (for some reason, add_header fails if included in prior if-block) if ($no_cache = "1") { add_header Set-Cookie "_mcnc=1; Max-Age=17; Path=/"; add_header X-Microcachable "0"; } # Bypass cache if no-cache cookie is set, these are absolutely critical for Wordpress installations that don't use JS comments if ($http_cookie ~* "(_mcnc|comment_author_|wordpress_(?!test_cookie)|wp-postpass_)") { set $no_cache "1"; } if ($request_uri ~* wpsf-(img|js)\.php) { proxy_ignore_headers Set-Cookie; } # Bypass cache if flag is set proxy_no_cache $no_cache; proxy_cache_bypass $no_cache; # under no circumstances should there ever be a retry of a POST request, or any other request for that matter proxy_next_upstream off; proxy_read_timeout 86400s; # Point nginx to the real app/web server proxy_pass http://localhost; # Set cache zone proxy_cache microcache; # Set cache key to include identifying components proxy_cache_key $scheme$host$request_method$request_uri$mobile_request; # Only cache valid HTTP 200 responses for this long proxy_cache_valid 200 15s; #proxy_cache_min_uses 3; # Serve from cache if currently refreshing proxy_cache_use_stale updating timeout; # Send appropriate headers through proxy_set_header Host $host; # no need for this proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; # no need for this proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; # Set files larger than 1M to stream rather than cache proxy_max_temp_file_size 1M; access_log /var/log/nginx/androidpolice-microcache.log custom; }

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3  | Next Page >