Search Results

Search found 19002 results on 761 pages for 'coded ui testing'.

Page 200/761 | < Previous Page | 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207  | Next Page >

  • Does Visual Studio run Tests with a less privileged process?

    - by Filip Ekberg
    I have an application that is supposed to read from the Registry and when executing a console application my registry access works perfectly. However when I move it over to a test this returns null: var masterKey = Registry.LocalMachine.OpenSubKey("path_to_my_key"); So my question is: Does Visual Studio run Tests with a less privileged process? I tested to see what user this gave me: var x = WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent().Name; and it gives me the same as in the console application. So I am a bit confused here.

    Read the article

  • Stop MSVC++ debug errors from blocking the current process?

    - by Mike Arthur
    Any failed ASSERT statements on Windows cause the below debug message to appear and freeze the applications execution. I realise this is expected behaviour but it is running periodically on a headless machine so prevent the unit tests from failing, instead waiting on user input indefinitely. Is there s a registry key or compiler flag I can use to prevent this message box from requesting user input whilst still allowing the test to fail under ASSERT? Basically, I want to do this without modifying any code, just changing compiler or Windows options. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to delete a form element without using jQuery .remove()?

    - by Tommy
    Using .remove() so that the select all check box is not submitted to the server. However, it is visible to the user as the select all checkbox is "physically" removed from the web page, upon submit. Instead, I would like removing the select all check box to appear seamless but NOT on the server side. i.e. - I would like to keep the input on the page but remove the element in the form array before it is sent. Can I manipulate the element[] array of the form before it is sent to the server and delete it there? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • JUnit Theories: Why can't I use Lists (instead of arrays) as DataPoints?

    - by MatrixFrog
    I've started using the new(ish) JUnit Theories feature for parameterizing tests. If your Theory is set up to take, for example, an Integer argument, the Theories test runner picks up any Integers marked with @DataPoint: @DataPoint public static Integer number = 0; as well as any Integers in arrays: @DataPoints public static Integer[] numbers = {1, 2, 3}; or even methods that return arrays like: @DataPoints public static Integer[] moreNumbers() { return new Integer[] {4, 5, 6};}; but not in Lists. The following does not work: @DataPoints public static List<Integer> numberList = Arrays.asList(7, 8, 9); Am I doing something wrong, or do Lists really not work? Was it a conscious design choice not to allow the use Lists as data points, or is that just a feature that hasn't been implemented yet? Are there plans to implement it in a future version of JUnit?

    Read the article

  • How do I call an upside down jQuery.slideDown()?

    - by Mark Rogers
    In the web app I'm working on I want to do a little slide up notification, like on twitter or your desktop. jQuery's .slideDown does exactly what I want, but it's upside down. The .slideUp doesn't execute an upside down version of slideDown. Instead it hides stuff, like after your cleaning up an old message you've displayed with slideDown. So what's the simplest code to do an upside down slideDown() in jQuery?

    Read the article

  • Rspec: "array.should == another_array" but without concern for order

    - by nicholaides
    I often want to compare arrays and make sure that they contain the same elements, in any order. IS there a consise way to do this in RSpec? Here are methods that aren't acceptable: #to_set For example: array.to_set.should == another_array.to_set This fails when the arrays contain duplicate items. #sort For example: array.sort.should == another_array.sort This fails when the arrays elements don't implement #<=> #size and #to_set For example: array.to_set.should == another_array.to_set array.size.should == another_array.size This would work, but there's got to be a better way.

    Read the article

  • TDD, Unit Test and architectural changes

    - by Leandro
    I'm writing an RPC middleware in C++. I have a class named RPCClientProxy that contains a socket client inside: class RPCClientProxy { ... private: Socket* pSocket; ... } The constructor: RPCClientProxy::RPCClientProxy(host, port) { pSocket = new Socket(host, port); } As you can see, I don't need to tell the user that I have a socket inside. Although, to make unit tests for my proxies it would be necessary to create mocks for sockets and pass them to the proxies, and to do so I must use a setter or pass a factory to the sockets in the proxies's constructors. My question: According to TDD, is it acceptable to do it ONLY because the tests? As you can see, these changes would change the way the library is used by a programmer.

    Read the article

  • Private Accessor for method is not found

    - by Farinha
    I'm getting this error when generating a new unit test under Visual Studio 2010 using the context menu (right-click the method name - "Generate Unit Tests"): Private Accessor for methodName is not found. Please rebuild the containing project or run the Publicize.exe manually. The method is public (checked that by applying applying a filter to not show non-public methods in the "Generate Unit Tests" dialog. Visual Studio creates some kind of .accessor file automatically. Do I need to do anything in it? What else could be the problem?

    Read the article

  • DomDocument::loadHTML() error during phpunit test execution

    - by ranhan
    I am currently trying to write some unit test against my zend framework controller. When I run the following code I receive this error: public function testListActionShouldContainListTable() { $this->loginToSystem(); $uri = $this->_uriBase . 'campaign/list'; $_SERVER["REQUEST_URI"] = $uri; $this->dispatch('/campaign/list'); $this->assertController('campaign'); $this->assertAction('list'); $this->assertQueryCount('#list',1); } CampaignControllerTests::testListActionShouldContainListTable DOMDocument::loadHTML(): ID alrt already defined in Entity, line: 36 This occurs using any of the assertQuery and assertQueryContains methods. I have searched around but am not really finding a good answer to why it won't allow me to find this html node or how to get around this error. Thanks in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • jquery.position() isn't working correctly.

    - by devzero
    I'm working on a menu system where I want a ul to show as a dropdown when the users does a mouseOver on li in another ul. I thought I'd use position to set the position of the dropdown (so it actually looks like a menu). What I want is the dropdown's top left corner to start at the same place as the bottom left corner of the wrapping listitem. Unfortunately the positioning fails in several different ways: In Firefox it seems like the dropdown's are offset with approximately -100 25 pixels the first item in the list has a different offset on the left side compared to the other items The offset in IE is not the same as in FF Doing the positioning repeatedly in explorer results in different positions each time. I've created a test page where you can see the effects: http://test.evju.biz/test/test_position.html

    Read the article

  • [C++] Boost test: catch user defined exceptions

    - by user231536
    If I have user defined exceptions in my code, I can't get Boost test to consider them as failures. For example, BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(MyTest,1) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MyTest) { // code which throws user defined exception, not derived from std::exception. } I get a generic message: Caught exception: .... unknown location(0):.... It does not recognize this error as a failure since it is not a std::exception. So it does not honor the expected_failures clause. How do I enforce that the piece of code should always throw an exception? THis seems to be a useful thing to want. In case future code changes cause the code to pass and the exception is not thrown, I want to know that.

    Read the article

  • swapping <div> ?

    - by kiran
    this is my sample code <div id="id-1"><div>sampledata</div><span>sampledata</span></div> <div id"id-2"><div>sampledata</div><div> smpledata</div></div> <div id"id-3"><div>sampledata</div><div> smpledata</div></div> <div id"id-3"><div>sampledata</div><div> smpledata</div></div> i'm having the id of only one div(for example id-3) . i want to swap that <div> with next <div>, since there is more than one <div> inside a <div> i cant use a next() . thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Integrating jQuery autocomplete with Google site search

    - by user1715700
    I have a bit of an odd situation. I have to implement search on a public facing website -but, that search must be able to search both web pages and have an autocomplete/suggestion functionality that comes from a list of terms that are in a DB table. So, I'm wondering a couple things: 1) should I be looking at Google search and jQuery autocomplete? 2) is there something else I should be looking at instead? 3) if this is the right path to be heading down are the enough pointers on implementation? The crux of my problem is that the terms that I need to use for the autocomplete/suggest functionality reside within a database and not on the webpages. So, I thought Google would be appropriate for search the webpages and that I could sort of fill in the blanks so to speak with these terms from the DB. I'm going to say that there are roughly 20-40,000 terms or so that need autocomplete. But that is really just a very rough guess -it could be less. I'm open to ideas and not really married to any particular solution. However, I will admit to liking the ideas of offloading the search to Google. I hear they have a good algorithm ;) Any ideas, thoughts, or leads are greatly appreciated!

    Read the article

  • jQuery Draggable Problem

    - by Jimbo
    Im trying to get a div to be movable within the constrains of the browser window, by dragging the titlebar inside the div. My code is as follows: <div id='container'> <h3 class='title' id='titlebar'>My Title</h3> </div> <script type='text/javascript'> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#titlebar").draggable({ containment: 'window', scroll: false, helper: $('#container') }); }); </script> Something is wrong with this (it wont do anything at all) but I cant see the problem!

    Read the article

  • Simple Java AMPQ server

    - by splix
    Are there exists an simple AMPQ server/broker implementation written in Java? I need it only for local integration tests, starting it from ant/maven, and i don't need any features like a clustering, persistence, performance and so on. Just a fake RabbitMQ-like instance, without installation (just as a dependency at maven pom) and configuration.

    Read the article

  • How to check restricted access pages for broken links?

    - by kumarsfriends
    Hi All, I was googling for tools for checking broken links in a remote web page. The w3c validator seemed a good one. But I am still unsure as how to check for pages which are restricted, i.e. the pages which I can only access by logging in to the site. Can we do that using the w3c validator? If not than is there any other tool for the same?

    Read the article

  • How to get Auto-completion in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by Richard77
    Hello, In ASP.NET MVC, we don't have controls which can do stuffs such as autocompletion (we don't have controls at all from Visual Studio like in web forms). But, Is it possible to still get 'Auto-completion' with a text box in ASP.NET MVC (like with the textbox found on the Google's Home page)? If this is the case, what's the best way to do so? JQueryUI? or there's someother way of getting that functionality? Thanks for helping.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207  | Next Page >