Search Results

Search found 27893 results on 1116 pages for 'event programming'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 212/1116 | < Previous Page | 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219  | Next Page >

  • Aspect Oriented Programming vs List<IAction> To execute methods based on conditions

    - by David Robbins
    I'm new to AOP so bear with me. Consider the following scenario: A state machine is used in a workflow engine, and after the state of the application is changed, a series of commands are executed. Depending on the state, different types of commands should be executed. As I see it, one implementation is to create List<IAction> and have each individual action determine whether it should execute. Would a Aspect Oriented process work as well? That is, could you create an aspect that notifies a class when a property changes, and execute the appropriate processes from that class? Would this help centralize the state specific rules?

    Read the article

  • jquery: show data after change event

    - by klox
    i have this code: <script> $("#mod").change(function() { var matches=str.match(/(EE|[EJU]).*(D)/i); $.ajax({ type="post", url="process.php", data="matches", cache=false, async=false, success= function(res){ $('#rslt').replaceWith("<div id='value'><h6>Tuner range is" + res + " .</h6></div>"); return this; } }); return false; }); </script> i want this code can show the result normally..where is my fault?

    Read the article

  • Bug in Programming Interviews Exposed?

    - by Sam
    Hi, I could not find an errata for the 2nd edition of this book. My question concerns the if-statement in the following piece of code. void removeHead (Node ** head) { Node * temp; if (!(*head)) { temp = (*head)->next; delete *head; *head = temp; } } So I understand that the point of the if-statement is to check if the Node is null. However by adding an additional "!" to the evaluation, wouldn't this negate the false value of null? Would it be correct to change it to something like: if (*head) { ... } Also if anyone knows where I can find an official errata for the 2nd edition that would be great. Thanks, Sam

    Read the article

  • Most frustrating programming style you've encountered

    - by JaredPar
    When it comes to coding style I'm a pretty relaxed programmer. I'm not firmly dug into a particular coding style. I'd prefer a consistent overall style in a large code base but I'm not going to sweat every little detail of how the code is formatted. Still there are some coding styles that drive me crazy. No matter what I can't look at examples of these styles without reaching for a VIM buffer to "fix" the "problem". I can't help it. It's not even wrong, I just can't look at it for some reason. For instance the following comment style almost completely prevents me from actually being able to read the code. if (someConditional) // Comment goes here { other code } What's the most frustrating style you've encountered?

    Read the article

  • Why jquery have problem with onbeforeprint event?

    - by Cesar Lopez
    Hi all, I have the following function. $(function() { $(".sectionHeader:gt(0)").click(function() { $(this).next(".fieldset").slideToggle("fast"); }); $("img[alt='minimize']").click(function(e) { $(this).closest("table").next(".fieldset").slideUp("fast"); e.stopPropagation(); return false; }); $("img[alt='maximize']").click(function(e) { $(this).closest("table").next(".fieldset").slideDown("fast"); e.stopPropagation(); return false; }); }); <script type="text/javascript"> window.onbeforeprint = expandAll; function expandAll(){ $(".fieldset:gt(0)").slideDown("fast"); } </script> For this html <table class="sectionHeader" ><tr ><td>Heading 1</td></tr></table> <div style="display:none;" class="fieldset">Content 1</div> <table class="sectionHeader" ><tr ><td>Heading 2</td></tr></table> <div style="display:none;" class="fieldset">Content 2</div> I have several div class="fieldset" over the page, but when I do print preview or print, I can see all divs sliding down before opening the print preview or printing but on the actual print preview or print out they are all collapse. I would appreciate if anyone comes with a solution for this. Anyone have any idea why is this or how to fix it? Thanks. PS:Using a does not work either ( I assume because jquery using toggle) and its not the kind of question I am looking for.

    Read the article

  • scroll position for div on timer tick event

    - by MeqDotNet
    I have a chat box that refresh every 7 seconds by a timer the problem is that the div is scrolling top each time the timer I have tried to add the following Page.ClientScript.RegisterClientScriptBlock(this.GetType(), "focus", "document.getElementById('divMessages').scrollTop = document.getElementById('divMessages').style.height;", true); to the timer tick but it doesn't work ticks here is my code <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr> <td style="width: 500px;"> <div id="divMessages" style="background-color: White; border-color:Black;border-width:1px;border-style:solid;height:300px;width:592px;overflow-y:scroll; font-size: 11px; padding: 4px 4px 4px 4px;" onload="SetScrollPosition();" onresize="SetScrollPosition()"> <asp:Literal Id="litMessages" runat="server" /> </div> </td> <td>&nbsp;</td> <td> <div id="divUsers" style="background-color: White; border-color:Black;border-width:1px;border-style:solid;height:300px;width:150px;overflow-y:scroll; font-size: 11px; padding: 4px 4px 4px 4px;"> <asp:Literal Id="litUsers" runat="server" /> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3"> <asp:TextBox Id="txtMessage" onkeyup="ReplaceChars()" onfocus="SetToEnd(this)" runat="server" MaxLength="100" Width="500px" /> <asp:Button Id="btnSend" runat="server" Text="Send" OnClientClick="SetScrollPosition()" OnClick="BtnSend_Click" /> &nbsp; <b>Color:</b> <asp:DropDownList Id="ddlColor" runat="server"> <asp:ListItem Value="Black" Selected="true">Black</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="Blue">Blue</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="Navy">Navy</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="Red">Red</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="Orange">Orange</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="#666666">Gray</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="Green">Green</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="#FF00FF">Pink</asp:ListItem> </asp:DropDownList> &nbsp; <asp:Button Id="btnLogOut" Text="Log Out" runat="server" OnClick="BtnLogOut_Click" /> </td> </tr> </table> <script type="text/javascript"> var div = document.getElementById('divMessages'); div.scrollTop = div.style.height; </script> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel>

    Read the article

  • java programming

    - by Baiba
    ok i have version of t code, please tell me what i need to do when i need to get out of program The INDEX NUMBER OF COLUMN IN WHICH ARE LEAST ZEROS? class Uzd{ public static void main(String args[]){ int mas[][]= {{3,4,7,5,0}, {4,5,3,0,1}, {8,2,4,0,3}, {7,0,2,0,1}, {0,0,1,3,0}}; int nul_mas[] = new int[5]; int nul=0; for(int j=0;j<5;j++){// nul=0; for(int i=0;i<5;i++){ if(mas[i][j]==0){ nul++; } } nul_mas[j]=nul; } for(int i=0;i<5;i++){ for(int j=0;j<5;j++){ System.out.print(mas[i][j]); } System.out.println(); } System.out.println();// atstarpe System.out.println("///zeros in each column///"); for(int i=0;i<5;i++){System.out.print(nul_mas[i]);} System.out.println(); }} and after running it shows: 34750 45301 82403 70201 00130 ///zeros in each column/// But i need not in each column but i need to get out index of column in which zeros are least! in this situation it is column nubmer 2!! 12032

    Read the article

  • negative values in integer programming model

    - by Lucia
    I'm new at using the glpk tool, and after writing a model for certain integer problem and running the solver (glpsol) i get negative values in some constraint that shouldn't be negative at all: No.Row name Activity Lower bound Upper bound 8 act[1] 0 -0 9 act[2] -3 -0 10 act[2] -2 -0 That constraint is defined like this: act{j in J}: sum{i in I} d[i,j] <= y[j]*m; where the sets and variables used are like this: param m, integer, 0; param n, integer, 0; set I := 1..m; set J := 1..n; var y{j in J}, binary; As the upper bound is negative, i think the problem may be in the y[j]*m parte, of the right side of the inequality.. perhaps something with the multiplication of binarys? or that the j in that side of the constrait is undefined? i dont know... i would be greatly grateful if someone can help me with this! :) and excuse for my bad english thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • about onmouseout event.please help.

    - by lazyanno
    as follow codes: <div id="outerBox" style="border:1px solid red;width:300;height:300" onmouseout="alert('out')"> <div id="innerBox" style="border:1px solid blue;width:50;height:50">inner</div> </div> why when i move mouse on the "innerBox", it was trigger alert('out') ? i want mouse out "outerBox" trigger alert('out') only, mouse on "innerBox" don't trigger alert. hot to do this? thanks all :)

    Read the article

  • how to use session in iphone programming?

    - by jaydp
    Hi Friends, I made an iphone story book application. Suppose any user read story book and at half of the story book he/she close the apps. when he/she want to read again this application at a time ask for continue or start again. This is possible by using session but i don't know how to use session in iphone sdk. So, please help me about this problem. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • event .split() no response

    - by klox
    i've been modified the code like below function addtext() { var barCode = this.(text); $("#model").change(function() { barCode = $this.val(); var data = barCode.split(""); $("#model").val(data[0]); $("#serial").val(data[1]); }); }; but..still not separate..please help.

    Read the article

  • Trouble adding event listeners via JavaScript

    - by Jack Roscoe
    Currently I have a function which loops to create multiple HTML objects. Each time an object is created, I want to add an onClick function listener to that object so that I can trigger a function when each one is clicked. What's the best way to do this? Here's the code which creates my objects: RenderMultipleChoice:function() { this.c = paper.rect(this.x, this.y, this.shapeWidth, this.shapeHeight); }

    Read the article

  • Patterns for dynamic CMS components (event driven?)

    - by CitrusTree
    Sorry my title is not great, this is my first real punt at moving 100% to OO as I've been procedural for more years than I can remember. I'm finding it hard to understand if what I'm trying to do is possible. Depending on people's thoughts on the 2 following points, I'll go down that route. The CMS I'm putting together is quote small, however focuses very much on different types of content. I could easily use Drupal which I'm very comfortable with, but I want to give myself a really good reasons to move myself into design patterns / OO-PHP 1) I have created a base 'content' class which I wish to be able to extend to handle different types of content. The base class, for example, handles HTML content, and extensions might handle XML or PDF output instead. On the other hand, at some point I may wish to extend the base class for a given project completely. I.e. if class 'content-v2' extended class 'content' for that site, any calls to that class should actually call 'content-v2' instead. Is that possible? If the code instantiates an object of type 'content' - I actually want it to instantiate one of type 'content-v2'... I can see how to do it using inheritance, but that appears to involve referring to the class explicitly, I can't see how to link the class I want it to use instead dynamically. 2) Secondly, the way I'm building this at the moment is horrible, I'm not happy with it. It feels very linear indeed - i.e. get session details get content build navigation theme page publish. To do this all the objects are called 1-by-1 which is all very static. I'd like it to be more dynamic so that I can add to it at a later date (very closely related to first question). Is there a way that instead of my orchestrator class calling all the other classes 1-by-1, then building the whole thing up at the end, that instead each of the other classes can 'listen' for specific events, then at the applicable point jump in and do their but? That way the orchestrator class would not need to know what other classes were required, and call them 1-by-1. Sorry if I've got this all twisted in my head. I'm trying to build this so it's really flexible.

    Read the article

  • Online Game programming in Google App Engine: AI

    - by Hortinstein
    I am currently in the planning stages of a game for google app engine, but cannot wrap my head around how I am going to handle AI. I intend to have persistant NPCs that will move about the map, but short of writing a program that generates the same XML requests I use to control player actions, than run it on another server I am stuck on how to do it. I have looked at the Task Queue feature, but due to long running processes not being an option on the App engine, I am a little stuck. I intend to run multiple server instances with 200+ persistant NPC entities that I will need to update. Most action is slowly roaming around based on player movements/concentrations, and attacking close range players(you can probably guess the type of game im developing)

    Read the article

  • Can a System Analyst come outside of programming?

    - by WeNeedAnswers
    Back in the day, if you wanted to be a Systems Analyst you had to work up the ranks from humble programmer. But these days there are University Courses/Programmes based on this topic alone. Is it thus valid for a graduate or post graduate to come into the world and just do systems analyst without doing the graft of being a programmer first, getting to know the nuances of what code is all about.

    Read the article

  • What the purpose/difference in using an event-type constructor

    - by phq
    In all examples I can find as well as the automatically generated code i Visual Studio, events are set using the following code: button1.Click += new System.EventHandler(this.button1_Click); But I can also write it visually cleaner by omitting the constructor wrapper: button1.Click += this.button1_Click; Which also compile fine. What is the difference between these two? And why is the first one mostly used/preferred?

    Read the article

  • how to jquery event bind to function

    - by sunglim
    $(function(){ $("#btnExcelRead").click(CheckValidation); }); var CheckValidation = function() { if ($("#excelUpload").val() === "") { alert("Select file"); return false; } if ($("$txtStartDate").val() === "") { alert("Check the start date!"); return false; } if ($("$txtEndDate").val() === "") { alert("Check the end date!"); return false; } } here i made simple jquery code. I want to bind function when btnExcelRead button click. is this originally wrong way?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219  | Next Page >