Search Results

Search found 19752 results on 791 pages for 'cpu window'.

Page 213/791 | < Previous Page | 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220  | Next Page >

• MSAcpi_ThermalZoneTemperature class not showing actual temperature

  - by jchoudhury

  i want to fetch CPU Performance data in real time including temperature. i used the following code to get CPU Temperature: try { ManagementObjectSearcher searcher = new ManagementObjectSearcher("root\\WMI", "SELECT * FROM MSAcpi_ThermalZoneTemperature"); foreach (ManagementObject queryObj in searcher.Get()) { double temp = Convert.ToDouble(queryObj["CurrentTemperature"].ToString()); double temp_critical = Convert.ToDouble(queryObj["CriticalTripPoint"].ToString()); double temp_cel = (temp/10 - 273.15); double temp_critical_cel = temp_critical / 10 - 273.15; lblCurrentTemp.Text = temp_cel.ToString(); lblCriticalTemp.Text = temp_critical_cel.ToString(); } } catch (ManagementException e) { MessageBox.Show("An error occurred while querying for WMI data: " + e.Message); } but this code shows the temperature that is not the correct temperature. It ususally shows 49.5-50.5 degrees centigrade. But I used "OpenHardwareMonitor" that report CPU temperature over 71 degree centigrade and changing fractions along with time fractions. is there anything I am missing in the code? I used the above code in timer_click event for every 500ms interval to refresh the temperature reading but it's always showing the same temperature from the beginning of execution. That implies if you run this application and if it shows 49 degree then after 1 hour session, it'll constantly show 49 degree. Where is the problem? please help. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• How to get Processor and Motherboard Id ?

  - by Frank

  I use the code from http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0580.html to get Motherboard Id, but the result is "null", <1 How can that be ? <2 Also I modified the code a bit to look like this to get processor Id : "Set objWMIService = GetObject(\"winmgmts:\\\\.\\root\\cimv2\")\n"+ "Set colItems = objWMIService.ExecQuery _ \n"+ " (\"Select * from Win32_Processor\") \n"+ "For Each objItem in colItems \n"+ " Wscript.Echo objItem.ProcessorId \n"+ " exit for ' do the first cpu only! \n"+ "Next \n"; The result is something like : ProcessorId = BFEBFBFF00010676 On http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa389273%28VS.85%29.aspx it says : ProcessorId : Processor information that describes the processor features. For an x86 class CPU, the field format depends on the processor support of the CPUID instruction. If the instruction is supported, the property contains 2 (two) DWORD formatted values. The first is an offset of 08h-0Bh, which is the EAX value that a CPUID instruction returns with input EAX set to 1. The second is an offset of 0Ch-0Fh, which is the EDX value that the instruction returns. Only the first two bytes of the property are significant and contain the contents of the DX register at CPU reset—all others are set to 0 (zero), and the contents are in DWORD format. I don't quite understand it, in plain English, is it unique or just a number for this class of processors, for instance all Intel Core2 Duo P8400 will have this number ? Frank

  Read the article

• Context migration in CUDA.NET

  - by Vyacheslav

  I'm currently using CUDA.NET library by GASS. I need to initialize cuda arrays (actually cublas vectors, but it doesn't matters) in one CPU thread and use them in other CPU thread. But CUDA context which holding all initialized arrays and loaded functions, can be attached to only one CPU thread. There is mechanism called context migration API to detach context from one thread and attach it to another. But i don't how to properly use it in CUDA.NET. I tried something like this: class Program { private static float[] vector1, vector2; private static CUDA cuda; private static CUBLAS cublas; private static CUdeviceptr ptr; static void Main(string[] args) { cuda = new CUDA(false); cublas = new CUBLAS(cuda); cuda.Init(); cuda.CreateContext(0); AllocateVectors(); cuda.DetachContext(); CUcontext context = cuda.PopCurrentContext(); GetVectorFromDeviceAsync(context); } private static void AllocateVectors() { vector1 = new float[]{1f, 2f, 3f, 4f, 5f}; ptr = cublas.Allocate(vector1.Length, sizeof (float)); cublas.SetVector(vector1, ptr); vector2 = new float[5]; } private static void GetVectorFromDevice(object objContext) { CUcontext localContext = (CUcontext) objContext; cuda.PushCurrentContext(localContext); cuda.AttachContext(localContext); //change vector somehow vector1[0] = -1; //copy changed vector to device cublas.SetVector(vector1, ptr); cublas.GetVector(ptr, vector2); CUDADriver.cuCtxPopCurrent(ref localContext); } private static void GetVectorFromDeviceAsync(CUcontext cUcontext) { Thread thread = new Thread(GetVectorFromDevice); thread.IsBackground = false; thread.Start(cUcontext); } } But execution fails on attempt to copy changed vector to device because context is not attached? Any ideas how i can get it work?

  Read the article

• Surprising results with .NET multi-theading algorithm

  - by Myles J

  Hi, I've recently wrote a C# console time tabling algorithm that is based on a combination of a genetic algorithm with a few brute force routines thrown in. The initial results were promising but I figured I could improve the performance by splitting the brute force routines up to run in parallel on multi processor architectures. To do this I used the well documented Producer/Consumer model (as documented in this fantastic article http://www.albahari.com/threading/part2.aspx#_ProducerConsumerQWaitHandle). I changed my code to create one thread per logical processor during the brute force routines. The performance gains on my work station were very pleasing. I am running Windows XP on the following hardware: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU 2.33 GHz 3.49 GB RAM Initial tests indicated average performance gains of approx 40% when using 4 threads. The next step was to deploy the new multi-threading version of the algorithm to our higher spec UAT server. Here is the spec of our UAT server: Windows 2003 Server R2 Enterprise x64 8 cpu (Quad-Core) AMD Opteron 2.70 GHz 255 GB RAM After running the first round of tests we were all extremely surprised to find that the algorithm actually runs slower on the high spec W2003 server than on my local XP work station! In fact the tests seem to indicate that it doesn't matter how many threads are generated (tests were ran with the app spawning between 2 to 32 threads). The algorithm always runs significantly slower on the UAT W2003 server? How could this be? Surely the app should run faster on a 8 cpu (Quad-Core) than my 2 Quad work station? Why are we seeing no performance gains with the multi-threading on the W2003 server whilst the XP workstation tests show gains of up to 40%? Any help or pointers would be appreciated. Regards Myles

  Read the article

• Winforms: How to speed up Invalidate()?

  - by Pedery

  I'm developing a retained mode drawing application in GDI+. The application can draw simple shapes to a canvas and perform basic editing. The math that does this is optimized to the last byte and is not an issue. I'm drawing on a panel that is using the built-in Controlstyles.DoubleBuffer. Now, my problem arises if I run my app maximized on a big monitor (HD in my case). If I try to draw a line from one corner of the (big) canvas to the diagonally oposite other, it will start to lag and the CPU goes high up. Each graphical object in my app has a boundingbox. Thus, when I invalidate the boundingbox of a line that goes from one corner of the maximized app to the oposite diagonal one, that boundingbox is virtually as big as the canvas. When a user is drawing a line, this invalidation of the boundingbox thus happens on the mousemove event, and there is a clear lag visible. This lag also exists if the line is the only object on the canvas. I've tried to optimize this in many ways. If I draw a shorter line, the CPU and the lag goes down. If I remove the Invalidate() and keep all other code, the app is quick. If I use a Region (that only spans the figure) to invalidate instead of the boundingbox, it is just as slow. If I split the boundingbox into a range of smaller boxes that lie back to back, thus reducing the invalidation area, no visible performance gain can be seen. Thus I'm at a loss here. How can I speed up the invalidation? On a side note, both Paint.Net and Mspaint suffers from the same shortcommings. Word and PowerPoint however, seem to be able to paint a line as described above with no lag and no CPU load at all. Thus it's possible to achieve the desired results, the question is how?

  Read the article

• Removing a platform from Configuration Manager

  - by demoncodemonkey

  I have a solution containing C# and C++/CLI projects. There are 3 platforms in my solution: Any CPU Win32 Mixed Platforms I never want to "just build the C# ones" or "just build the C++ ones", I always want to build all projects. So the platforms metaphor is meaningless to me, I'll leave it on Mixed Platforms or whatever as long as they all build. Now VS sometimes automatically switches the current platform to Any CPU (I'm not sure when or why). This means that pressing F7 will only try to build the C# projects, which is obviously no good. So I have to switch back to Mixed Platforms and try again. So how to workaround this irritating problem? I have tried 2 ways: In Configuration Manager, remove Any CPU and Win32 platforms. This worked until I added a new project and Visual Studio very kindly added them back in... :/ In Configuration Manager, check all checkboxes for all projects in all configurations in all platforms. This becomes a nightmare to manage with many projects in the solution. Any other ideas?

  Read the article

• SQL Server Blocking Issue

  - by Robin Weston

  We currently have an issue that occurs roughly once a day on SQL 2005 database server, although the time it happens is not consistent. Basically, the database grinds to a halt, and starts refusing connections with the following error message. This includes logging into SSMS: A connection was successfully established with the server, but then an error occurred during the login process. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - The specified network name is no longer available.) Our CPU usage for SQL is usually around 15%, but when the DB is in it's broken state it's around 70%, so it's clearly doing something, even if no-one can connect. Even if I disable the web app that uses the database the CPU still doesn't go down. I am unable to restart the SQLSERVER process as it is unresponsive, so I have to end up killing the process manually, which then puts the DB into Suspect/Recovery mode (which I can fix but it's a pain). Below are some PerfMon stats I gathered when the DB was in it's broken state which might help. I have a bunch more if people want to request them: Active Transactions: 2 (Never Changes) Logical Connections: 34 (NC) Process Blocked: 16 (NC) User Connections: 30 (NC) Batch Request: 0 (NC) Active Jobs: 2 (NC) Log Truncations: 596 (NC) Log Shrinks: 24 (NC) Longest Running Transaction Time: 99 (NC) I guess they key is finding out what the DB is using it's CPU on, but as I can't even log into SSMS this isn't possible with the standard methods. Disturbingly, I can't even use the dedicated admin connection to get into SSMS. I get the same timout as with all other requests. Any advice, reccomendations, or even sympathy, is much appreciated!

  Read the article

• Simple description of worker and I/O threads in .NET

  - by Konstantin

  It's very hard to find detailed but simple description of worker and I/O threads in .NET What's clear to me regarding this topic (but may not be technically precise): Worker threads are threads that should employ CPU for their work; I/O threads (also called "completion port threads") should employ device drivers for their work and essentially "do nothing", only monitor the completion of non-CPU operations. What is not clear: Although method ThreadPool.GetAvailableThreads returns number of available threads of both types, it seems there is no public API to schedule work for I/O thread. You can only manually create worker thread in .NET? It seems that single I/O thread can monitor multiple I/O operations. Is it true? If so, why ThreadPool has so many available I/O threads by default? In some texts I read that callback, triggered after I/O operation completion is performed by I/O thread. Is it true? Isn’t this a job for worker thread, considering that this callback is CPU operation? To be more specific – do ASP.NET asynchronous pages user I/O threads? What exactly is performance benefit in switching I/O work to separate thread instead of increasing maximum number of worker threads? Is it because single I/O thread does monitor multiple operations? Or Windows does more efficient context switching when using I/O threads?

  Read the article

• Java Random Slowdowns on Mac OS cont'd

  - by javajustice

  I asked this question a few weeks ago, but I'm still having the problem and I have some new hints. The original question is here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1651887/java-random-slowdowns-on-mac-os Basically, I have a java application that splits a job into independent pieces and runs them in separate threads. The threads have no synchronization or shared memory items. The only resources they do share are data files on the hard disk, with each thread having an open file channel. Most of the time it runs very fast, but occasionally it will run very slow for no apparent reason. If I attach a CPU profiler to it, then it will start running quickly again. If I take a CPU snapshot, it says its spending most of its time in "self time" in a function that doesn't do anything except check a few (unshared unsynchronized) booleans. I don't know how this could be accurate because 1, it makes no sense, and 2, attaching the profiler seems to knock the threads out of whatever mode they're in and fix the problem. Also, regardless of whether it runs fast or slow, it always finishes and gives the same output, and it never dips in total cpu usage (in this case ~1500%), implying that the threads aren't getting blocked. I have tried different garbage collectors, different sizings the parts of the memory space, writing data output to non-raid drives, and putting all data output in threads separate the main worker threads. Does anyone have any idea what kind of problem this could be? Could it be the operating system (OS X 10.6.2) ? I have not been able to duplicate it on a windows machine, but I don't have one with a similar hardware configuration.

  Read the article

• java GC periodically enters into several full GC cycles

  - by Peter

  Environment: sun JDK 1.6.0_16 vm settings: -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -Xms1024 -Xmx1024M -XX:MaxNewSize=448m -XX:NewSize=448m -XX:SurvivorRatio=4(6 also checked) -XX:MaxPermSize=128M OS: windows server 2003 processor: 4 cores of INTEL XEON 5130, 2000 Hz my application description: high intensity of concurrent(java 5 concurrency used) operations completed each time by commit to oracle. it's about 20-30 threads run non stop, doing tasks. application runs in JBOSS web container. My GC starts work normally, I see a lot of small GCs and all that time CPU shows good load, like all 4 cores loaded to 40-50%, CPU graph is stable. Then , after 1 min of good work, CPU starts drop to 0% on 2 cores from 4, it's graph becomes unstable, goes up and down("teeth"). I see, that my threads work slower(I have monitoring), I see that GC starts produce a lot of FULL GC during that time and next 4-5 minutes this situation remains as is, then for short period of time, like 1 minute, it gets back to normal situation, but shortly after that all bad thing repeats. Question: Why I have so frequent full GC??? How to prevent that? I played with SurvivorRatio - does not help. I noticed, that application behaves normally until first FULL GC occurs, while I have enough memory. Then it runs badly. my GC LOG: starts good then long period of FULL GCs(many of them) 1027.861: [GC 942200K-623526K(991232K), 0.0887588 secs] 1029.333: [GC 803279K(991232K), 0.0927470 secs] 1030.551: [GC 967485K-625549K(991232K), 0.0823024 secs] 1030.634: [GC 625957K(991232K), 0.0763656 secs] 1033.126: [GC 969613K-632963K(991232K), 0.0850611 secs] 1033.281: [GC 649899K(991232K), 0.0378358 secs] 1035.910: [GC 813948K(991232K), 0.3540375 secs] 1037.994: [GC 967729K-637198K(991232K), 0.0826042 secs] 1038.435: [GC 710309K(991232K), 0.1370703 secs] 1039.665: [GC 980494K-972462K(991232K), 0.6398589 secs] 1040.306: [Full GC 972462K-619643K(991232K), 3.7780597 secs] 1044.093: [GC 620103K(991232K), 0.0695221 secs] 1047.870: [Full GC 991231K-626514K(991232K), 3.8732457 secs] 1053.739: [GC 942140K(991232K), 0.5410483 secs] 1056.343: [Full GC 991232K-634157K(991232K), 3.9071443 secs] 1061.257: [GC 786274K(991232K), 0.3106603 secs] 1065.229: [Full GC 991232K-641617K(991232K), 3.9565638 secs] 1071.192: [GC 945999K(991232K), 0.5401515 secs] 1073.793: [Full GC 991231K-648045K(991232K), 3.9627814 secs] 1079.754: [GC 936641K(991232K), 0.5321197 secs]

  Read the article

• New projects not built when target platform is set explicitly

  - by stiank81

  I create a new solution with one project, and then change the target platform from "Any CPU" to "x86". After this new projects added doesn't get built by default, and their target platform doesn't follow the global settings. Why?! Looking at the configuration manager new projects added are not checked to "Build", and they get target platform "Any CPU" instead of the globally set x86. Why is this happening? I expect new projects too to get the globally set and defined x86 target platform.. Some things I've tried: Toggle global platform back to Any CPU, and then to x86 again. No change.. Choosing platform explicitly for the new project. x86 is not available in the list, and when I say <New..> and try adding it I'm not allowed as ".. a solution platform with the same name already exists.". On the build properties for the new project I can't change the platform in the Configuration section, but I can set "Platform target" to x86 in the General section. It is however not clear whether this actually makes a difference, and it wouldn't respond if I change the target platform globally later. Initially I thought this was a problem from converting my solution from VS2008 to VS2010, but the problem applies both places. I.e. when I create a solution in VS2008 and just stay in VS2008 I still get the problem.

  Read the article

• Did I implement clock drift properly?

  - by David Titarenco

  I couldn't find any clock drift RNG code for Windows anywhere so I attempted to implement it myself. I haven't run the numbers through ent or DIEHARD yet, and I'm just wondering if this is even remotely correct... void QueryRDTSC(__int64* tick) { __asm { xor eax, eax cpuid rdtsc mov edi, dword ptr tick mov dword ptr [edi], eax mov dword ptr [edi+4], edx } } __int64 clockDriftRNG() { __int64 CPU_start, CPU_end, OS_start, OS_end; // get CPU ticks -- uses RDTSC on the Processor QueryRDTSC(&CPU_start); Sleep(1); QueryRDTSC(&CPU_end); // get OS ticks -- uses the Motherboard clock QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER*)&OS_start); Sleep(1); QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER*)&OS_end); // CPU clock is ~1000x faster than mobo clock // return raw return ((CPU_end - CPU_start)/(OS_end - OS_start)); // or // return a random number from 0 to 9 // return ((CPU_end - CPU_start)/(OS_end - OS_start)%10); } If you're wondering why I Sleep(1), it's because if I don't, OS_end - OS_start returns 0 consistently (because of the bad timer resolution, I presume). Basically, (CPU_end - CPU_start)/(OS_end - OS_start) always returns around 1000 with a slight variation based on the entropy of CPU load, maybe temperature, quartz crystal vibration imperfections, etc. Anyway, the numbers have a pretty decent distribution, but this could be totally wrong. I have no idea.

  Read the article

• How long is the time frame between context switches on Windows?

  - by mattcodes

  Reading CLR via C# 2.0 (I dont have 3.0 with me at the moment) Is this still the case: If there is only one CPU in a computer, only one thread can run at any one time. Windows has to keep track of the thread objects, and every so often, Windows has to decide which thread to schedule next to go to the CPU. This is additional code that has to execute once every 20 milliseconds or so. When Windows makes a CPU stop executing one thread's code and start executing another thread's code, we call this a context switch. A context switch is fairly expensive because the operating system has to: So circa CLR via C# 2.0 lets say we are on Pentium 4 2.4ghz 1 core non-HT, XP. Every 20 milliseconds? Where a CLR thread or Java thread is mapped to an OS thread only a maximum of 50 threads per second may get a chance to to run? I've read that context switching is very fast in mircoseconds here on SO, but how often roughly (magnitude style guesses) will say a modest 5 year old server Windows 2003 Pentium Xeon single core give the OS the opportunity to context switch? 20ms in the right area? I dont need exact figures I just want to be sure that's in the right area, seems rather long to me.

  Read the article

• How expensive is a context switch? Is it better to implement a manual task switch than to rely on OS

  - by Vilx-

  The title says it all. Imagine I have two (three, four, whatever) tasks that have to run in parallel. Now, the easy way to do this would be to create separate threads and forget about it. But on a plain old single-core CPU that would mean a lot of context switching - and we all know that context switching is big, bad, slow, and generally simply Evil. It should be avoided, right? On that note, if I'm writing the software from ground up anyway, I could go the extra mile and implement my own task-switching. Split each task in parts, save the state inbetween, and then switch among them within a single thread. Or, if I detect that there are multiple CPU cores, I could just give each task to a separate thread and all would be well. The second solution does have the advantage of adapting to the number of available CPU cores, but will the manual task-switch really be faster than the one in the OS core? Especially if I'm trying to make the whole thing generic with a TaskManager and an ITask, etc?

  Read the article

• Emulating a computer running MS-DOS

  - by Richard

  Writing emulators has always fascinated me. Now I want to write an emulator for an IBM PC and run MS-DOS on it (I've got the floppy image files). I have good experience in C++ and C and basic knowledge of assembler and the architecture of a CPU. I also know that there are thousands of emulators out there doing exactly what I want to do, but I'd be doing this for pure joy only. How much work do I have to expect? (If my goal is to boot DOS and create a text file with it, all emulated) What CPU should I emulate ? Where can I find documentation on how the machine code is organized and which opcodes mean what, so I can unpack and execute them correctly with my emulator? Does MS-DOS still run on the newest generations of processors? Would it theoretically be able to natively run on a 64-bit AMD Phenom 2 processor w/ a modern mainboard, HDD, RAM, etc.? What else, besides emulating the CPU, could be an important factor (in terms of difficulty)? I would only aim for outputting / inputting text to the system via the host system's console, no sound or other more advanced IO etc. Have you written an emulator yet? What was your first one for? How hard was it? Do you have any special tips for me? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• My program is spending most of its time in objc_msgSend. Does that mean that Objective-C has bad per

  - by Paperflyer

  Hello Stackoverflow. I have written an application that has a number of custom views and generally draws a lot of lines and bitmaps. Since performance is somewhat critical for the application, I spent a good amount of time optimizing draw performance. Now, activity monitor tells me that my application is usually using about 12% CPU and Instrument (the profiler) says that a whopping 10% CPU is spent in objc_msgSend (mostly in drawing related system calls). On the one hand, I am glad about this since it means that my drawing is about as fast as it gets and my optimizations where a huge success. On the other hand, it seems to imply that the only thing that is still using my CPU is the Objective-C overhead for messages (objc_msgSend). Hence, that if I had written the application in, say, Carbon, its performance would be drastically better. Now I am tempted to conclude that Objective-C is a language with bad performance, even though Cocoa seems to be awfully efficient since it can apparently draw faster than Objective-C can send messages. So, is Objective-C really a language with bad performance? What do you think about that?

  Read the article

• how do you convert data frame to a custom json format

  - by user1471980

  I need to convert a data frame to json fomrat in R. My data frame y is this: dput(y) structure(list(Name = structure(c(38L, 23L, 16L, 35L, 21L, 6L, 34L, 15L, 46L, 1L, 43L, 28L, 39L, 27L, 7L, 20L, 14L, 44L, 48L, 36L), .Label = c("server09", "server10", "server11", "server12", "server13", "server14", "server15", "server16", "server17", "server18", "server19", "server20", "server21", "server22", "server23", "server24", "server25", "server26", "server27", "server28", "server29", "server30", "server31", "server32", "server33", "server34", "server35", "server36", "server37", "server38", "server39", "server40", "server41", "server42", "server43", "server44", "server45", "server46", "server47", "server48", "server49", "server50", "server51", "server52", "server53", "server54", "server55", "server56", "server57", "server58"), class = "factor"), Date = c(1372737600, 1372737602, 1372737609, 1372737617, 1372737618, 1372737618, 1372737643, 1372737646, 1372737648, 1372737652, 1372737654, 1372737660, 1372737665, 1372737671, 1372737699, 1372737701, 1372737718, 1372737721, 1372737728, 1372737731), Cpu = c(3.9025, 36.3042, 2.6075, 3.1338, 0.9474, 0.149, 5.4401, 2.5652, 0.3612, 3.2651, 1.8703, 13.8967, 4.2438, 5.4401, 2.468, 0.9147, 1.4637, 7.2528, 6.119, 7.7009)), .Names = c("Name", "Date", "Cpu"), row.names = c(1L, 42L, 83L, 84L, 125L, 126L, 127L, 168L, 169L, 202L, 203L, 236L, 277L, 318L, 359L, 360L, 361L, 362L, 395L, 396L), class = "data.frame") I need my json file to look like this: [{ "name":'server13', "data": [ [1372737600,3.9025], [1372737602,10], [1372737609,10] ... [1372737731,20] ] }, { "name":'server14', "data": [ [1372737600,4], [1372737602,10], [1372737609,10] ... [1372737731,30] ] }] I used rjson package as the following: p <- toJSON(as.list(y)) I get this output: "{\"Name\":[\"server13\",\"servar14\",...],\"Date\":[1372737600,1372737602,..],\"Cpu\":[3.9025,36.3042,..]}" Is there an easy way to do this in R?

  Read the article

• Add animation when user control get visible and collapsed In Wpf

  - by sanjeev40084

  I have two xaml files MainWindow.xaml and other user control WorkDetail.xaml file. MainWindow.xaml file has a textbox, button, listbox and reference to WorkDetail.xaml(user control which is collapsed). Whenever user enter any text, it gets added in listbox when the add button is clicked. When any items from the listbox is double clicked, the visibility of WorkDetail.xaml is set to Visible and it gets displayed. In WorkDetail.xaml (user control) it has textblock and button. The Textblock displays the text of selected item and close button sets the visibility of WorkDetail window to collapsed. Now i am trying to animate WorkDetail.xaml when it gets visible and collapse. When any items from listbox is double clicked and WorkDetail.xaml visibility is set to visible, i want to create an animation of moving WorkDetail.xaml window from right to left on MainWindow. When Close button from WorkDetail.xaml file is clicked and WorkDetail.xaml file is collapsed, i want to slide the WorkDetail.xaml file from left to right from MainWindow. Here is the screenshot: MainWindow.xaml code: <Window...> <Grid Background="Black" > <TextBox x:Name="enteredWork" Height="39" Margin="44,48,49,0" TextWrapping="Wrap" VerticalAlignment="Top"/> <ListBox x:Name="workListBox" Margin="26,155,38,45" FontSize="29.333" MouseDoubleClick="workListBox_MouseDoubleClick"/> <Button x:Name="addWork" Content="Add" Height="34" Margin="71,103,120,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Click="Button_Click"/> <TestWpf:WorkDetail x:Name="WorkDetail" Visibility="Collapsed"/> </Grid> </Window> MainWindow.xaml.cs class code: namespace TestWpf { public partial class MainWindow : Window { public MainWindow() { this.InitializeComponent(); } private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { workListBox.Items.Add(enteredWork.Text); } private void workListBox_MouseDoubleClick(object sender, MouseButtonEventArgs e) { WorkDetail.workTextBlk.Text = (string)workListBox.SelectedItem; WorkDetail.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; } } } WorkDetail.xaml code: <UserControl ..> <Grid Background="#FFD2CFCF"> <TextBlock x:Name="workTextBlk" Height="154" Margin="33,50,49,0" TextWrapping="Wrap" VerticalAlignment="Top" FontSize="29.333" Background="#FFF13939"/> <Button x:Name="btnClose" Content="Close" Height="62" Margin="70,0,94,87" VerticalAlignment="Bottom" Click="btnClose_Click"/> </Grid> </UserControl> WorkDetail.xaml.cs class code: namespace TestWpf { public partial class WorkDetail : UserControl { public WorkDetail() { this.InitializeComponent(); } private void btnClose_Click(object sender, System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs e) { Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; } } } Can anyone tell how can i do this?

  Read the article

• WPF DataGrid and Avalon TimePicker binding problem

  - by Jorge Vargas

  I'm using a the WPF DataGrid from the wpf toolkit and a TimePicker from AvalonControlsLibrary to insert a collection of TimeSpans. My problem is that bindings are not working inside the DataGrid, and I have no clue of why this isn't working. Here is my setup: I have the following XAML: <Window x:Class="Views.TestMainWindow" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" xmlns:wpf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/wpf/2008/toolkit" xmlns:a="http://schemas.AvalonControls/AvalonControlsLibrary/Controls" SizeToContent="WidthAndHeight" MinHeight="250" MinWidth="300"> <Grid> <Grid.RowDefinitions> <RowDefinition Height="*" /> <RowDefinition Height="Auto" /> </Grid.RowDefinitions> <GroupBox Grid.Row="0"> <GroupBox.Header> Testing it: </GroupBox.Header> <wpf:DataGrid ItemsSource="{Binding Path=TestSpans}" AutoGenerateColumns="False"> <wpf:DataGrid.Columns> <wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn Header="Start"> <wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate> <DataTemplate> <a:TimePicker SelectedTime="{Binding Path=., Mode=TwoWay}" /> </DataTemplate> </wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellEditingTemplate> <wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate> <DataTemplate> <TextBlock Text="{Binding}" /> </DataTemplate> </wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate> </wpf:DataGridTemplateColumn> </wpf:DataGrid.Columns> </wpf:DataGrid> </GroupBox> <StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Grid.Row="1"> <a:TimePicker SelectedTime="{Binding Path=SelectedTime, Mode=TwoWay}" /> </StackPanel> </Grid> And this is my ViewModel: Imports System.Collections.ObjectModel Namespace ViewModels Public Class TestMainWindowViewModel Private _selectedTime As TimeSpan = DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay Public Property SelectedTime() As TimeSpan Get Return _selectedTime End Get Set(ByVal value As TimeSpan) _selectedTime = value End Set End Property Private _testSpans As ObservableCollection(Of TimeSpan) = New ObservableCollection(Of TimeSpan) Public Property TestSpans() As ObservableCollection(Of TimeSpan) Get Return _testSpans End Get Set(ByVal value As ObservableCollection(Of TimeSpan)) _testSpans = value End Set End Property Public Sub New() _testSpans.Add(DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay) _testSpans.Add(DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay) _testSpans.Add(DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay) End Sub End Class End Namespace I'm starting this window in application.xaml.vb like this: Class Application ' Application-level events, such as Startup, Exit, and DispatcherUnhandledException ' can be handled in this file. Protected Overrides Sub OnStartup(ByVal e As System.Windows.StartupEventArgs) MyBase.OnStartup(e) Dim window As Views.TestMainWindow = New Views.TestMainWindow window.DataContext = New TestMainWindowViewModel() window.Show() End Sub End Class

  Read the article

• problem with sIFR 3 not displaying in IE just getting XXX

  - by user288306

  I am having a problem with sIFR 3 not displaying in IE. I get 3 larges black XXX in IE yet it displays fine in Firefox. I have checked i do have the most recent version of flash installed correctly. Here is the code on the page <div id="features"> <div id="mainmessage_advertisers"><h2>Advertisers</h2><br /><br /><h3><a href="">Reach your customers where they browse. Buy directly from top web publishers.</a></h3><br /><br /><br /><a href=""><img src="img/buyads.gif" border="0"></a></div> <div id="mainmessage_publishers"><h2>Publishers</h2><br /><br /><h3>Take control of your ad space and start generating more revenue than <u>ever before</u>.</h3><br /><br /><br /><a href=""><img src="img/sellads.gif" border="0"></a></div> </div>` Here is the code from my global.css #mainmessage_advertisers { width: 395px; height: 200px; padding: 90px 50px; border: 1px; float: left; } #mainmessage_publishers { width: 395px; height: 200px; padding: 90px 50px; float: right; } and here is what i have in my sifr.js /*********************************************************************** SIFR 3.0 (BETA 1) FUNCTIONS ************************************************************************/ var parseSelector=(function(){var _1=/\s*,\s*/;var _2=/\s*([\s>+~(),]|^|$)\s*/g;var _3=/([\s>+~,]|[^(]\+|^)([#.:@])/g;var _4=/^[^\s>+~]/;var _5=/[\s#.:>+~()@]|[^\s#.:>+~()@]+/g;function parseSelector(_6,_7){_7=_7||document.documentElement;var _8=_6.split(_1),_9=[];for(var i=0;i<_8.length;i++){var _b=[_7],_c=toStream(_8[i]);for(var j=0;j<_c.length;){var _e=_c[j++],_f=_c[j++],_10="";if(_c[j]=="("){while(_c[j++]!=")"&&j<_c.length){_10+=_c[j]}_10=_10.slice(0,-1)}_b=select(_b,_e,_f,_10)}_9=_9.concat(_b)}return _9}function toStream(_11){var _12=_11.replace(_2,"$1").replace(_3,"$1*$2");if(_4.test(_12)){_12=" "+_12}return _12.match(_5)||[]}function select(_13,_14,_15,_16){return (_17[_14])?_17[_14](_13,_15,_16):[]}var _18={toArray:function(_19){var a=[];for(var i=0;i<_19.length;i++){a.push(_19[i])}return a}};var dom={isTag:function(_1d,tag){return (tag=="*")||(tag.toLowerCase()==_1d.nodeName.toLowerCase())},previousSiblingElement:function(_1f){do{_1f=_1f.previousSibling}while(_1f&&_1f.nodeType!=1);return _1f},nextSiblingElement:function(_20){do{_20=_20.nextSibling}while(_20&&_20.nodeType!=1);return _20},hasClass:function(_21,_22){return (_22.className||"").match("(^|\\s)"+_21+"(\\s|$)")},getByTag:function(tag,_24){return _24.getElementsByTagName(tag)}};var _17={"#":function(_25,_26){for(var i=0;i<_25.length;i++){if(_25[i].getAttribute("id")==_26){return [_25[i]]}}return []}," ":function(_28,_29){var _2a=[];for(var i=0;i<_28.length;i++){_2a=_2a.concat(_18.toArray(dom.getByTag(_29,_28[i])))}return _2a},">":function(_2c,_2d){var _2e=[];for(var i=0,_30;i<_2c.length;i++){_30=_2c[i];for(var j=0,_32;j<_30.childNodes.length;j++){_32=_30.childNodes[j];if(_32.nodeType==1&&dom.isTag(_32,_2d)){_2e.push(_32)}}}return _2e},".":function(_33,_34){var _35=[];for(var i=0,_37;i<_33.length;i++){_37=_33[i];if(dom.hasClass([_34],_37)){_35.push(_37)}}return _35},":":function(_38,_39,_3a){return (pseudoClasses[_39])?pseudoClasses[_39](_38,_3a):[]}};parseSelector.selectors=_17;parseSelector.pseudoClasses={};parseSelector.util=_18;parseSelector.dom=dom;return parseSelector})(); var sIFR=new function(){var _3b=this;var _3c="sIFR-active";var _3d="sIFR-replaced";var _3e="sIFR-flash";var _3f="sIFR-ignore";var _40="sIFR-alternate";var _41="sIFR-class";var _42="sIFR-layout";var _43="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";var _44=6;var _45=126;var _46=8;var _47="SIFR-PREFETCHED";var _48=" ";this.isActive=false;this.isEnabled=true;this.hideElements=true;this.replaceNonDisplayed=false;this.preserveSingleWhitespace=false;this.fixWrap=true;this.registerEvents=true;this.setPrefetchCookie=true;this.cookiePath="/";this.domains=[];this.fromLocal=true;this.forceClear=false;this.forceWidth=true;this.fitExactly=false;this.forceTextTransform=true;this.useDomContentLoaded=true;this.debugMode=false;this.hasFlashClassSet=false;var _49=0;var _4a=false,_4b=false;var dom=new function(){this.getBody=function(){var _4d=document.getElementsByTagName("body");if(_4d.length==1){return _4d[0]}return null};this.addClass=function(_4e,_4f){if(_4f){_4f.className=((_4f.className||"")==""?"":_4f.className+" ")+_4e}};this.removeClass=function(_50,_51){if(_51){_51.className=_51.className.replace(new RegExp("(^|\\s)"+_50+"(\\s|$)"),"").replace(/^\s+|(\s)\s+/g,"$1")}};this.hasClass=function(_52,_53){return new RegExp("(^|\\s)"+_52+"(\\s|$)").test(_53.className)};this.create=function(_54){if(document.createElementNS){return document.createElementNS(_43,_54)}return document.createElement(_54)};this.setInnerHtml=function(_55,_56){if(ua.innerHtmlSupport){_55.innerHTML=_56}else{if(ua.xhtmlSupport){_56=["<root xmlns=\"",_43,"\">",_56,"</root>"].join("");var xml=(new DOMParser()).parseFromString(_56,"text/xml");xml=document.importNode(xml.documentElement,true);while(_55.firstChild){_55.removeChild(_55.firstChild)}while(xml.firstChild){_55.appendChild(xml.firstChild)}}}};this.getComputedStyle=function(_58,_59){var _5a;if(document.defaultView&&document.defaultView.getComputedStyle){_5a=document.defaultView.getComputedStyle(_58,null)[_59]}else{if(_58.currentStyle){_5a=_58.currentStyle[_59]}}return _5a||""};this.getStyleAsInt=function(_5b,_5c,_5d){var _5e=this.getComputedStyle(_5b,_5c);if(_5d&&!/px$/.test(_5e)){return 0}_5e=parseInt(_5e);return isNaN(_5e)?0:_5e};this.getZoom=function(){return _5f.zoom.getLatest()}};this.dom=dom;var ua=new function(){var ua=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();var _62=(navigator.product||"").toLowerCase();this.macintosh=ua.indexOf("mac")>-1;this.windows=ua.indexOf("windows")>-1;this.quicktime=false;this.opera=ua.indexOf("opera")>-1;this.konqueror=_62.indexOf("konqueror")>-1;this.ie=false/*@cc_on || true @*/;this.ieSupported=this.ie&&!/ppc|smartphone|iemobile|msie\s5\.5/.test(ua)/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version >= 5.5 @*/;this.ieWin=this.ie&&this.windows/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version >= 5.1 @*/;this.windows=this.windows&&(!this.ie||this.ieWin);this.ieMac=this.ie&&this.macintosh/*@cc_on && @_jscript_version < 5.1 @*/;this.macintosh=this.macintosh&&(!this.ie||this.ieMac);this.safari=ua.indexOf("safari")>-1;this.webkit=ua.indexOf("applewebkit")>-1&&!this.konqueror;this.khtml=this.webkit||this.konqueror;this.gecko=!this.webkit&&_62=="gecko";this.operaVersion=this.opera&&/.*opera(\s|\/)(\d+\.\d+)/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$2):0;this.webkitVersion=this.webkit&&/.*applewebkit\/(\d+).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.geckoBuildDate=this.gecko&&/.*gecko\/(\d{8}).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.konquerorVersion=this.konqueror&&/.*konqueror\/(\d\.\d).*/.exec(ua)?parseInt(RegExp.$1):0;this.flashVersion=0;if(this.ieWin){var axo;var _64=false;try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.7")}catch(e){try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.6");this.flashVersion=6;axo.AllowScriptAccess="always"}catch(e){_64=this.flashVersion==6}if(!_64){try{axo=new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash")}catch(e){}}}if(!_64&&axo){this.flashVersion=parseFloat(/([\d,?]+)/.exec(axo.GetVariable("$version"))[1].replace(/,/g,"."))}}else{if(navigator.plugins&&navigator.plugins["Shockwave Flash"]){var _65=navigator.plugins["Shockwave Flash"];this.flashVersion=parseFloat(/(\d+\.?\d*)/.exec(_65.description)[1]);var i=0;while(this.flashVersion>=_46&&i<navigator.mimeTypes.length){var _67=navigator.mimeTypes[i];if(_67.type=="application/x-shockwave-flash"&&_67.enabledPlugin.description.toLowerCase().indexOf("quicktime")>-1){this.flashVersion=0;this.quicktime=true}i++}}}this.flash=this.flashVersion>=_46;this.transparencySupport=this.macintosh||this.windows;this.computedStyleSupport=this.ie||document.defaultView&&document.defaultView.getComputedStyle&&(!this.gecko||this.geckoBuildDate>=20030624);this.css=true;if(this.computedStyleSupport){try{var _68=document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0];_68.style.backgroundColor="#FF0000";var _69=dom.getComputedStyle(_68,"backgroundColor");this.css=!_69||/\#F{2}0{4}|rgb\(255,\s?0,\s?0\)/i.test(_69);_68=null}catch(e){}}this.xhtmlSupport=!!window.DOMParser&&!!document.importNode;this.innerHtmlSupport;try{var n=dom.create("span");if(!this.ieMac){n.innerHTML="x"}this.innerHtmlSupport=n.innerHTML=="x"}catch(e){this.innerHtmlSupport=false}this.zoomSupport=!!(this.opera&&document.documentElement);this.geckoXml=this.gecko&&(document.contentType||"").indexOf("xml")>-1;this.requiresPrefetch=this.ieWin||this.khtml;this.verifiedKonqueror=false;this.supported=this.flash&&this.css&&(!this.ie||this.ieSupported)&&(!this.opera||this.operaVersion>=8)&&(!this.webkit||this.webkitVersion>=412)&&(!this.konqueror||this.konquerorVersion>3.5)&&this.computedStyleSupport&&(this.innerHtmlSupport||!this.khtml&&this.xhtmlSupport)};this.ua=ua;var _6b=new function(){function capitalize($){return $.toUpperCase()}this.normalize=function(str){if(_3b.preserveSingleWhitespace){return str.replace(/\s/g,_48)}return str.replace(/(\s)\s+/g,"$1")};this.textTransform=function(_6e,str){switch(_6e){case "uppercase":str=str.toUpperCase();break;case "lowercase":str=str.toLowerCase();break;case "capitalize":var _70=str;str=str.replace(/^\w|\s\w/g,capitalize);if(str.indexOf("function capitalize")!=-1){var _71=_70.replace(/(^|\s)(\w)/g,"$1$1$2$2").split(/^\w|\s\w/g);str="";for(var i=0;i<_71.length;i++){str+=_71[i].charAt(0).toUpperCase()+_71[i].substring(1)}}break}return str};this.toHexString=function(str){if(typeof (str)!="string"||!str.charAt(0)=="#"||str.length!=4&&str.length!=7){return str}str=str.replace(/#/,"");if(str.length==3){str=str.replace(/(.)(.)(.)/,"$1$1$2$2$3$3")}return "0x"+str};this.toJson=function(obj){var _75="";switch(typeof (obj)){case "string":_75="\""+obj+"\"";break;case "number":case "boolean":_75=obj.toString();break;case "object":_75=[];for(var _76 in obj){if(obj[_76]==Object.prototype[_76]){continue}_75.push("\""+_76+"\":"+_6b.toJson(obj[_76]))}_75="{"+_75.join(",")+"}";break}return _75};this.convertCssArg=function(arg){if(!arg){return {}}if(typeof (arg)=="object"){if(arg.constructor==Array){arg=arg.join("")}else{return arg}}var obj={};var _79=arg.split("}");for(var i=0;i<_79.length;i++){var $=_79[i].match(/([^\s{]+)\s*\{(.+)\s*;?\s*/);if(!$||$.length!=3){continue}if(!obj[$[1]]){obj[$[1]]={}}var _7c=$[2].split(";");for(var j=0;j<_7c.length;j++){var $2=_7c[j].match(/\s*([^:\s]+)\s*\:\s*([^\s;]+)/);if(!$2||$2.length!=3){continue}obj[$[1]][$2[1]]=$2[2]}}return obj};this.extractFromCss=function(css,_80,_81,_82){var _83=null;if(css&&css[_80]&&css[_80][_81]){_83=css[_80][_81];if(_82){delete css[_80][_81]}}return _83};this.cssToString=function(arg){var css=[];for(var _86 in arg){var _87=arg[_86];if(_87==Object.prototype[_86]){continue}css.push(_86,"{");for(var _88 in _87){if(_87[_88]==Object.prototype[_88]){continue}css.push(_88,":",_87[_88],";")}css.push("}")}return escape(css.join(""))}};this.util=_6b;var _5f={};_5f.fragmentIdentifier=new function(){this.fix=true;var _89;this.cache=function(){_89=document.title};function doFix(){document.title=_89}this.restore=function(){if(this.fix){setTimeout(doFix,0)}}};_5f.synchronizer=new function(){this.isBlocked=false;this.block=function(){this.isBlocked=true};this.unblock=function(){this.isBlocked=false;_8a.replaceAll()}};_5f.zoom=new function(){var _8b=100;this.getLatest=function(){return _8b};if(ua.zoomSupport&&ua.opera){var _8c=document.createElement("div");_8c.style.position="fixed";_8c.style.left="-65536px";_8c.style.top="0";_8c.style.height="100%";_8c.style.width="1px";_8c.style.zIndex="-32";document.documentElement.appendChild(_8c);function updateZoom(){if(!_8c){return}var _8d=window.innerHeight/_8c.offsetHeight;var _8e=Math.round(_8d*100)%10;if(_8e>5){_8d=Math.round(_8d*100)+10-_8e}else{_8d=Math.round(_8d*100)-_8e}_8b=isNaN(_8d)?100:_8d;_5f.synchronizer.unblock();document.documentElement.removeChild(_8c);_8c=null}_5f.synchronizer.block();setTimeout(updateZoom,54)}};this.hacks=_5f;var _8f={kwargs:[],replaceAll:function(){for(var i=0;i<this.kwargs.length;i++){_3b.replace(this.kwargs[i])}this.kwargs=[]}};var _8a={kwargs:[],replaceAll:_8f.replaceAll};function isValidDomain(){if(_3b.domains.length==0){return true}var _91="";try{_91=document.domain}catch(e){}if(_3b.fromLocal&&sIFR.domains[0]!="localhost"){sIFR.domains.unshift("localhost")}for(var i=0;i<_3b.domains.length;i++){if(_3b.domains[i]=="*"||_3b.domains[i]==_91){return true}}return false}this.activate=function(){if(!ua.supported||!this.isEnabled||this.isActive||!isValidDomain()){return}this.isActive=true;if(this.hideElements){this.setFlashClass()}if(ua.ieWin&&_5f.fragmentIdentifier.fix&&window.location.hash!=""){_5f.fragmentIdentifier.cache()}else{_5f.fragmentIdentifier.fix=false}if(!this.registerEvents){return}function handler(evt){_3b.initialize();if(evt&&evt.type=="load"){if(document.removeEventListener){document.removeEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",handler,false);document.removeEventListener("load",handler,false)}if(window.removeEventListener){window.removeEventListener("load",handler,false)}}}if(window.addEventListener){if(_3b.useDomContentLoaded&&ua.gecko){document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",handler,false)}window.addEventListener("load",handler,false)}else{if(ua.ieWin){if(_3b.useDomContentLoaded&&!_4a){document.write("<scr"+"ipt id=__sifr_ie_onload defer src=//:></script>");document.getElementById("__sifr_ie_onload").onreadystatechange=function(){if(this.readyState=="complete"){handler();this.removeNode()}}}window.attachEvent("onload",handler)}}};this.setFlashClass=function(){if(this.hasFlashClassSet){return}dom.addClass(_3c,dom.getBody()||document.documentElement);this.hasFlashClassSet=true};this.removeFlashClass=function(){if(!this.hasFlashClassSet){return}dom.removeClass(_3c,dom.getBody());dom.removeClass(_3c,document.documentElement);this.hasFlashClassSet=false};this.initialize=function(){if(_4b||!this.isActive||!this.isEnabled){return}_4b=true;_8f.replaceAll();clearPrefetch()};function getSource(src){if(typeof (src)!="string"){if(src.src){src=src.src}if(typeof (src)!="string"){var _95=[];for(var _96 in src){if(src[_96]!=Object.prototype[_96]){_95.push(_96)}}_95.sort().reverse();var _97="";var i=-1;while(!_97&&++i<_95.length){if(parseFloat(_95[i])<=ua.flashVersion){_97=src[_95[i]]}}src=_97}}if(!src&&_3b.debugMode){throw new Error("sIFR: Could not determine appropriate source")}if(ua.ie&&src.charAt(0)=="/"){src=window.location.toString().replace(/([^:]+)(:\/?\/?)([^\/]+).*/,"$1$2$3")+src}return src}this.prefetch=function(){if(!ua.requiresPrefetch||!ua.supported||!this.isEnabled||!isValidDomain()){return}if(this.setPrefetchCookie&&new RegExp(";?"+_47+"=true;?").test(document.cookie)){return}try{_4a=true;if(ua.ieWin){prefetchIexplore(arguments)}else{prefetchLight(arguments)}if(this.setPrefetchCookie){document.cookie=_47+"=true;path="+this.cookiePath}}catch(e){if(_3b.debugMode){throw e}}};function prefetchIexplore(_99){for(var i=0;i<_99.length;i++){document.write("<embed src=\""+getSource(_99[i])+"\" sIFR-prefetch=\"true\" style=\"display:none;\">")}}function prefetchLight(_9b){for(var i=0;i<_9b.length;i++){new Image().src=getSource(_9b[i])}}function clearPrefetch(){if(!ua.ieWin||!_4a){return}try{var _9d=document.getElementsByTagName("embed");for(var i=_9d.length-1;i>=0;i--){var _9f=_9d[i];if(_9f.getAttribute("sIFR-prefetch")=="true"){_9f.parentNode.removeChild(_9f)}}}catch(e){}}function getRatio(_a0){if(_a0<=10){return 1.55}if(_a0<=19){return 1.45}if(_a0<=32){return 1.35}if(_a0<=71){return 1.3}return 1.25}function getFilters(obj){var _a2=[];for(var _a3 in obj){if(obj[_a3]==Object.prototype[_a3]){continue}var _a4=obj[_a3];_a3=[_a3.replace(/filter/i,"")+"Filter"];for(var _a5 in _a4){if(_a4[_a5]==Object.prototype[_a5]){continue}_a3.push(_a5+":"+escape(_6b.toJson(_6b.toHexString(_a4[_a5]))))}_a2.push(_a3.join(","))}return _a2.join(";")}this.replace=function(_a6,_a7){if(!ua.supported){return}if(_a7){for(var _a8 in _a6){if(typeof (_a7[_a8])=="undefined"){_a7[_a8]=_a6[_a8]}}_a6=_a7}if(!_4b){return _8f.kwargs.push(_a6)}if(_5f.synchronizer.isBlocked){return _8a.kwargs.push(_a6)}var _a9=_a6.elements;if(!_a9&&parseSelector){_a9=parseSelector(_a6.selector)}if(_a9.length==0){return}this.setFlashClass();var src=getSource(_a6.src);var css=_6b.convertCssArg(_a6.css);var _ac=getFilters(_a6.filters);var _ad=(_a6.forceClear==null)?_3b.forceClear:_a6.forceClear;var _ae=(_a6.fitExactly==null)?_3b.fitExactly:_a6.fitExactly;var _af=_ae||(_a6.forceWidth==null?_3b.forceWidth:_a6.forceWidth);var _b0=parseInt(_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","leading"))||0;var _b1=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","background-color",true)||"#FFFFFF";var _b2=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","opacity",true)||"100";if(parseFloat(_b2)<1){_b2=100*parseFloat(_b2)}var _b3=_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","kerning",true)||"";var _b4=_a6.gridFitType||_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-align")=="right"?"subpixel":"pixel";var _b5=_3b.forceTextTransform?_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-transform",true)||"none":"none";var _b6="";if(_ae){_6b.extractFromCss(css,".sIFR-root","text-align",true)}if(!_a6.modifyCss){_b6=_6b.cssToString(css)}var _b7=_a6.wmode||"";if(_b7=="transparent"){if(!ua.transparencySupport){_b7="opaque"}else{_b1="transparent"}}for(var i=0;i<_a9.length;i++){var _b9=_a9[i];if(!ua.verifiedKonqueror){if(dom.getComputedStyle(_b9,"lineHeight").match(/e\+08px/)){ua.supported=_3b.isEnabled=false;this.removeFlashClass();return}ua.verifiedKonqueror=true}if(dom.hasClass(_3d,_b9)||dom.hasClass(_3f,_b9)){continue}var _ba=false;if(!_b9.offsetHeight||!_b9.offsetWidth){if(!_3b.replaceNonDisplayed){continue}_b9.style.display="block";if(!_b9.offsetHeight||!_b9.offsetWidth){_b9.style.display="";continue}_ba=true}if(_ad&&ua.gecko){_b9.style.clear="both"}var _bb=null;if(_3b.fixWrap&&ua.ie&&dom.getComputedStyle(_b9,"display")=="block"){_bb=_b9.innerHTML;dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"X")}var _bc=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"width",ua.ie);if(ua.ie&&_bc==0){var _bd=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"paddingRight",true);var _be=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"paddingLeft",true);var _bf=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"borderRightWidth",true);var _c0=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"borderLeftWidth",true);_bc=_b9.offsetWidth-_be-_bd-_c0-_bf}if(_bb&&_3b.fixWrap&&ua.ie){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}var _c1,_c2;if(!ua.ie){_c1=dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"lineHeight");_c2=Math.floor(dom.getStyleAsInt(_b9,"height")/_c1)}else{if(ua.ie){var _bb=_b9.innerHTML;_b9.style.visibility="visible";_b9.style.overflow="visible";_b9.style.position="static";_b9.style.zoom="normal";_b9.style.writingMode="lr-tb";_b9.style.width=_b9.style.height="auto";_b9.style.maxWidth=_b9.style.maxHeight=_b9.style.styleFloat="none";var _c3=_b9;var _c4=_b9.currentStyle.hasLayout;if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"<div class=\""+_42+"\">X<br />X<br />X</div>");_c3=_b9.firstChild}else{dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"X<br />X<br />X")}var _c5=_c3.getClientRects();_c1=_c5[1].bottom-_c5[1].top;_c1=Math.ceil(_c1*0.8);if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,"<div class=\""+_42+"\">"+_bb+"</div>");_c3=_b9.firstChild}else{dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}_c5=_c3.getClientRects();_c2=_c5.length;if(_c4){dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_bb)}_b9.style.visibility=_b9.style.width=_b9.style.height=_b9.style.maxWidth=_b9.style.maxHeight=_b9.style.overflow=_b9.style.styleFloat=_b9.style.position=_b9.style.zoom=_b9.style.writingMode=""}}if(_ba){_b9.style.display=""}if(_ad&&ua.gecko){_b9.style.clear=""}_c1=Math.max(_44,_c1);_c1=Math.min(_45,_c1);if(isNaN(_c2)||!isFinite(_c2)){_c2=1}var _c6=Math.round(_c2*_c1);if(_c2>1&&_b0){_c6+=Math.round((_c2-1)*_b0)}var _c7=dom.create("span");_c7.className=_40;var _c8=_b9.cloneNode(true);for(var j=0,l=_c8.childNodes.length;j<l;j++){_c7.appendChild(_c8.childNodes[j].cloneNode(true))}if(_a6.modifyContent){_a6.modifyContent(_c8,_a6.selector)}if(_a6.modifyCss){_b6=_a6.modifyCss(css,_c8,_a6.selector)}var _cb=handleContent(_c8,_b5);if(_a6.modifyContentString){_cb=_a6.modifyContentString(_cb,_a6.selector)}if(_cb==""){continue}var _cc=["content="+_cb.replace(/\</g,"&lt;").replace(/>/g,"&gt;"),"width="+_bc,"height="+_c6,"fitexactly="+(_ae?"true":""),"tunewidth="+(_a6.tuneWidth||""),"tuneheight="+(_a6.tuneHeight||""),"offsetleft="+(_a6.offsetLeft||""),"offsettop="+(_a6.offsetTop||""),"thickness="+(_a6.thickness||""),"sharpness="+(_a6.sharpness||""),"kerning="+_b3,"gridfittype="+_b4,"zoomsupport="+ua.zoomSupport,"filters="+_ac,"opacity="+_b2,"blendmode="+(_a6.blendMode||""),"size="+_c1,"zoom="+dom.getZoom(),"css="+_b6];_cc=encodeURI(_cc.join("&amp;"));var _cd="sIFR_callback_"+_49++;var _ce={flashNode:null};window[_cd+"_DoFSCommand"]=(function(_cf){return function(_d0,arg){if(/(FSCommand\:)?resize/.test(_d0)){var $=arg.split(":");_cf.flashNode.setAttribute($[0],$[1]);if(ua.khtml){_cf.flashNode.innerHTML+=""}}}})(_ce);_c6=Math.round(_c2*getRatio(_c1)*_c1);var _d3=_af?_bc:"100%";var _d4;if(ua.ie){_d4=["<object classid=\"clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000\" id=\"",_cd,"\" sifr=\"true\" width=\"",_d3,"\" height=\"",_c6,"\" class=\"",_3e,"\">","<param name=\"movie\" value=\"",src,"\"></param>","<param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"",_cc,"\"></param>","<param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\"></param>","<param name=\"quality\" value=\"best\"></param>","<param name=\"wmode\" value=\"",_b7,"\"></param>","<param name=\"bgcolor\" value=\"",_b1,"\"></param>","<param name=\"name\" value=\"",_cd,"\"></param>","</object>","<scr","ipt event=FSCommand(info,args) for=",_cd,">",_cd,"_DoFSCommand(info, args);","</","script>"].join("")}else{_d4=["<embed class=\"",_3e,"\" type=\"application/x-shockwave-flash\" src=\"",src,"\" quality=\"best\" flashvars=\"",_cc,"\" width=\"",_d3,"\" height=\"",_c6,"\" wmode=\"",_b7,"\" bgcolor=\"",_b1,"\" name=\"",_cd,"\" allowScriptAccess=\"always\" sifr=\"true\"></embed>"].join("")}dom.setInnerHtml(_b9,_d4);_ce.flashNode=_b9.firstChild;_b9.appendChild(_c7);dom.addClass(_3d,_b9);if(_a6.onReplacement){_a6.onReplacement(_ce.flashNode)}}_5f.fragmentIdentifier.restore()};function handleContent(_d5,_d6){var _d7=[],_d8=[];var _d9=_d5.childNodes;var i=0;while(i<_d9.length){var _db=_d9[i];if(_db.nodeType==3){var _dc=_6b.normalize(_db.nodeValue);_dc=_6b.textTransform(_d6,_dc);_d8.push(_dc.replace(/\%/g,"%25").replace(/\&/g,"%26").replace(/\,/g,"%2C").replace(/\+/g,"%2B"))}if(_db.nodeType==1){var _dd=[];var _de=_db.nodeName.toLowerCase();var _df=_db.className||"";if(/\s+/.test(_df)){if(_df.indexOf(_41)){_df=_df.match("(\\s|^)"+_41+"-([^\\s$]*)(\\s|$)")[2]}else{_df=_df.match(/^([^\s]+)/)[1]}}if(_df!=""){_dd.push("class=\""+_df+"\"")}if(_de=="a"){var _e0=_db.getAttribute("href")||"";var _e1=_db.getAttribute("target")||"";_dd.push("href=\""+_e0+"\"","target=\""+_e1+"\"")}_d8.push("<"+_de+(_dd.length>0?" ":"")+escape(_dd.join(" "))+">");if(_db.hasChildNodes()){_d7.push(i);i=0;_d9=_db.childNodes;continue}else{if(!/^(br|img)$/i.test(_db.nodeName)){_d8.push("</",_db.nodeName.toLowerCase(),">")}}}if(_d7.length>0&&!_db.nextSibling){do{i=_d7.pop();_d9=_db.parentNode.parentNode.childNodes;_db=_d9[i];if(_db){_d8.push("</",_db.nodeName.toLowerCase(),">")}}while(i<_d9.length&&_d7.length>0)}i++}return _d8.join("").replace(/\n|\r/g,"")}}; sIFR.prefetch({ src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf' }); sIFR.activate(); sIFR.replace({ selector: 'h2, h3', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#000000', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-1' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#000000' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#000000' }, '.span': { 'color': '#979797' }, 'label': { 'color': '#E11818' } } }); sIFR.replace({ selector: 'h4', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#7E7E7E', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-0.8' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#7E7E7E' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#7E7E7E' }, 'label': { 'color': '#E11818' } } }); sIFR.replace({ selector: '#cart p', src: 'swf/sifr/helvetica-lt.swf', wmode: 'transparent', css: { '.sIFR-root' : { 'color': '#979797', 'font-weight': 'bold', 'letter-spacing': '-0.8' }, 'a': { 'text-decoration': 'none' }, 'a:link': { 'color': '#979797' }, 'a:hover': { 'color': '#000000' }, 'label': { 'color': '#979797' } } }); Thank you in advance for your help!

  Read the article

• AVAudioRecorder Memory Leak

  - by Eric Ranschau

  I'm hoping someone out there can back me up on this... I've been working on an application that allows the end user to record a small audio file for later playback and am in the process of testing for memory leaks. I continue to very consistently run into a memory leak when the AVAudioRecorder's "stop" method attempts to close the audio file to which it's been recording. This really seems to be a leak in the framework itself, but if I'm being a bonehead you can tell me. To illustrate, I've worked up a stripped down test app that does nothing but start/stop a recording w/ the press of a button. For the sake of simplicty, everything happens in app. delegate as follows: @synthesize audioRecorder, button; @synthesize window; - (BOOL) application:(UIApplication *)application didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)launchOptions { // create compplete path to database NSString *tempPath = NSTemporaryDirectory(); NSString *audioFilePath = [tempPath stringByAppendingString:@"/customStatement.caf"]; // define audio file url NSURL *audioFileURL = [[NSURL alloc] initFileURLWithPath:audioFilePath]; // define audio recorder settings NSDictionary *settings = [[NSDictionary alloc] initWithObjectsAndKeys: [NSNumber numberWithInt:kAudioFormatAppleIMA4], AVFormatIDKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt:1], AVNumberOfChannelsKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt:AVAudioQualityLow], AVSampleRateConverterAudioQualityKey, [NSNumber numberWithFloat:44100], AVSampleRateKey, [NSNumber numberWithInt:8], AVLinearPCMBitDepthKey, nil ]; // define audio recorder audioRecorder = [[AVAudioRecorder alloc] initWithURL:audioFileURL settings:settings error:nil]; [audioRecorder setDelegate:self]; [audioRecorder setMeteringEnabled:YES]; [audioRecorder prepareToRecord]; // define record button button = [UIButton buttonWithType:UIButtonTypeRoundedRect]; [button addTarget:self action:@selector(handleTouch_recordButton) forControlEvents:UIControlEventTouchUpInside]; [button setFrame:CGRectMake(110.0, 217.5, 100.0, 45.0)]; [button setTitle:@"Record" forState:UIControlStateNormal]; [button setTitle:@"Stop" forState:UIControlStateSelected]; // configure the main view controller UIViewController *viewController = [[UIViewController alloc] init]; [viewController.view addSubview:button]; // add controllers to window [window addSubview:viewController.view]; [window makeKeyAndVisible]; // release [audioFileURL release]; [settings release]; [viewController release]; return YES; } - (void) handleTouch_recordButton { if ( ![button isSelected] ) { [button setSelected:YES]; [audioRecorder record]; } else { [button setSelected:NO]; [audioRecorder stop]; } } - (void) dealloc { [audioRecorder release]; [button release]; [window release]; [super dealloc]; } The stack trace from Instruments that shows pretty clearly that the "closeFile" method in the AVFoundation code is leaking...something. You can see a screen shot of the Instruments session here: Developer Forums: AVAudioRecorder Memory Leak Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!

  Read the article

• pyQt4: QWidget subclass not responding to new setStyleSheet() background colour

  - by Ronny

  I am having an issue with PyQt4. I want to create a new widget within a window, and I want this widget to have a custom color. When i create a subclass of the QWidget class, and instantiate it, I am not able to change its background color through the setStyleSheet() function. When I instantiate a new QWidget object, I have no problems in changing its background color. But i dont want an ordinary QWidget object.I want to create my own subclass of QWidget. When i create a subclass of a QPushButton, I am also able to change its background color using the setStyleSheet() function. There are no error messages or warnings in the console window, it just refuses to work properly without any indication as to why. So what i would like to know is why is it that i can change the background color of a widget if i simply create a QWidget object, or a subclass of QPushButton, but not when i create a subclass of QWidget. And how can i therefore change the background color of an object that is a subclass of QWidget? Is it maybe something specific to the version of python or PyQt that i am using? Is it a bug in the library? or some flaw in the way that i am writing my code? I am using python 2.6.4 and PyQt4 Below is an example of the code that leads me to trouble. There are three widgets within the window one below the other. The parent widget is set with background color of green. The top widget is set to red, the middle one, is the subclass of QWidget, which should be blue, but it appears invisible because it takes on the color of the parent window for some reason. and the bottom widget is a subclass of QPushButton and is white. import sys from PyQt4 import QtGui, QtCore ################################################################################ #--------------------------------------------------------- CUSTOM WIDGET CLASS 1 class CustomWidget(QtGui.QWidget): def __init__(self, parent): QtGui.QWidget.__init__(self, parent) # some custom properties and functions will follow ################################################################################ #--------------------------------------------------------- CUSTOM WIDGET CLASS 2 class CustomWidget2(QtGui.QPushButton): def __init__(self, parent): QtGui.QPushButton.__init__(self, parent) # some custom properties and functions will follow ################################################################################ #----------------------------------------------------------- PARENT WIDGET CLASS class Parent(QtGui.QWidget): def __init__(self, parent=None): #---------------------------------------------------------- SETUP WINDOW QtGui.QWidget.__init__(self, parent) self.resize(500, 340) self.setStyleSheet("QWidget {background-color: #00FF00}") #-------------------------------------------------- SETUP DEFAULT WIDGET wid1 = QtGui.QWidget(self) wid1.setGeometry(10, 10, 480, 100) wid1.setStyleSheet("QWidget {background-color: #FF0000 }") #------------------------------------------------- SETUP CUSTOM WIDGET 1 wid2 = CustomWidget(self) wid2.setGeometry(10, 120, 480, 100) wid2.setStyleSheet("QWidget {background-color: #0000FF }") for i in dir(wid2): print i #------------------------------------------------- SETUP CUSTOM WIDGET 2 wid3 = CustomWidget2(self) wid3.setGeometry(10, 230, 480, 100) wid3.setStyleSheet("QWidget {background-color: #FFFFFF }") ################################################################################ #-------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN app = QtGui.QApplication(sys.argv) win = Parent() win.show() app.exec_()

  Read the article

• WPF ComboBox SelectedValue not updating from binding source.

  - by vg1890

  Here's my binding source object: Public Class MyListObject Private _mylist As New ObservableCollection(Of String) Private _selectedName As String Public Sub New(ByVal nameList As List(Of String), ByVal defaultName As String) For Each name In nameList _mylist.Add(name) Next _selectedName = defaultName End Sub Public ReadOnly Property MyList() As ObservableCollection(Of String) Get Return _mylist End Get End Property Public ReadOnly Property SelectedName() As String Get Return _selectedName End Get End Property End Class Here is my XAML: <Window x:Class="Window1" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" Title="Window1" Height="300" Width="300" xmlns:local="clr-namespace:WpfApplication1" > <Window.Resources> <ObjectDataProvider x:Key="MyListObject" ObjectInstance="" /> </Window.Resources> <Grid> <ComboBox Height="23" Margin="24,91,53,0" Name="ComboBox1" VerticalAlignment="Top" SelectedValue="{Binding Path=SelectedName, Source={StaticResource MyListObject}, Mode=OneWay}" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=MyList, Source={StaticResource MyListObject}, Mode=OneWay}" /> <Button Height="23" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Margin="47,0,0,87" Name="btn_List1" VerticalAlignment="Bottom" Width="75">List 1</Button> <Button Height="23" Margin="0,0,75,87" Name="btn_List2" VerticalAlignment="Bottom" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Width="75">List 2</Button> </Grid> </Window> Here's the code-behind: Class Window1 Private obj1 As MyListObject Private obj2 As MyListObject Private odp As ObjectDataProvider Public Sub New() InitializeComponent() Dim namelist1 As New List(Of String) namelist1.Add("Joe") namelist1.Add("Steve") obj1 = New MyListObject(namelist1, "Steve") . Dim namelist2 As New List(Of String) namelist2.Add("Bob") namelist2.Add("Tim") obj2 = New MyListObject(namelist2, "Tim") odp = DirectCast(Me.FindResource("MyListObject"), ObjectDataProvider) odp.ObjectInstance = obj1 End Sub Private Sub btn_List1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs) Handles btn_List1.Click odp.ObjectInstance = obj1 End Sub Private Sub btn_List2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.RoutedEventArgs) Handles btn_List2.Click odp.ObjectInstance = obj2 End Sub End Class When the Window first loads, the bindings hook up fine. The ComboBox contains the names "Joe" and "Steve" and "Steve" is selected by default. However, when I click a button to switch the ObjectInstance to obj2, the ComboBox ItemsSource gets populated correctly in the dropdown, but the SelectedValue is set to Nothing instead of being equal to obj2.SelectedName. Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Dumb IE6 resize behaviour - hope it rings some bells with someone

  - by Ollie2893

  Hi, I'm having no end of fun (sic) with jQuery.tabs. The widget is quite crafty in that it turns basic HTML like so <div> <ul> <li>Tab #1</li> ... </ul> <div for panel #1> </div> <div for panel #2> </div> ... </div> into a cute tabbed dialogue. (It does so by restyling the UL and then toggling the "display" attribute for the panel DIVs to show/not show whatever panel is selected.) Now I found that I can spare myself a lot of trouble in my JS project if I insert a scrollable IFRAME into each panel. One usability problem I'm trying to ameliorate is that when the tabbed panel becomes larger than the browser's window, then the user ends up with too many scrollbars. I am trying to avoid this situation by linking the size of the tabbed panel to that of $(window). That is, I trap and process the resize event on $(window). To make my life bearable, all components are relatively sized. This is also true, in particular, of the IFRAMEs (100% width, 100% height). The only exception are the panel DIVs, which are of fixed height (in px). And this is the only dimension css attribute that I manipulate during my resize action. All of this works a treat in FF and Chrome, but IE6 is doing something rather cute: So long as I do not affect the width of the browser window (but only change its height), only the panel DIV changes in height; the IFRAME contained will not change. As a result of this behaviour, it is not possible to shorten the tabbed panel below the height of the IFRAME. I can lengthen the DIV, yes. But the IFRAME will not fill the panel in that case. All becomes good the moment I make the slightest change to the width of the browser window. In that moment, the IFRAME expands to catch up with the extended DIV or DIV and IFRAME contract in tandem. Bizarre. I inserted useless CSS instructions like "position: relative" and "zoom: 1". Also nudged the display with "display: block". No joy so far. Any ideas? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Pass HTML-DOM to Flex's actionscript.

  - by raj

  Hi, All i want is to pass a HTML-Form (DOM object) from javascript to Actionscript. i saw this article on the net and tried a similar code. But when i execute the code in IE, it alerts : "Out of memory at line 18". I'm stuck here from yesterday. i'll post the mxml and html here.. The MXML : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute" creationComplete="init()"> <mx:Script> <![CDATA[ public function init() : void { if (ExternalInterface.available) { try { ExternalInterface.addCallback("populateFlashFile", populateFlashFile); } catch (error:SecurityError) { } catch (error:Error) { } } } public function populateFlashFile(window:*) : void { log.text = window.toString(); // just for checking if window has come to the function. window.document.write("Hello"); } ]]> </mx:Script> <mx:TextArea x="10" y="23" width="712" height="581" id="log"/> </mx:Application> The HTML : <html lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> </head> <body scroll="no"> <input type="button" onclick="document.getElementById('Test').populateFlashFile(window);"/> <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="Test" width="100%" height="100%" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab"> <param name="movie" value="Test.swf" /> <param name="quality" value="high" /> <param name="bgcolor" value="#869ca7" /> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /> </object> </body> </html> The problem occors only when i pass some DOM object, if i pass some String it works.!!! i.e : <input type="button" onclick="document.getElementById('Test').populateFlashFile('some text here');"/> works great!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220  | Next Page >