Search Results

Search found 61651 results on 2467 pages for 'function object'.

Page 219/2467 | < Previous Page | 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226  | Next Page >

  • Easy way to cast an object array into another type in C#

    - by Na7coldwater
    I want to be able to be able to quickly cast an array of objects to a different type, such as String, but the following code doesn't work: String[] a = new String[2]; a[0] = "Hello"; a[1] = "World"; ArrayList b = new ArrayList(a); String[] c = (String[]) b.ToArray(); And I don't want to have to do this: String[] a = new String[2]; a[0] = "Hello"; a[1] = "World"; ArrayList b = new ArrayList(a); Object[] temp = b.ToArray(); Object[] temp = b.ToArray(); String[] c = new String[temp.Length]; for(int i=0;i<temp.Length;i++) { c[i] = (String) temp[i]; } Is there an easy way to do this without using a temporary variable?

    Read the article

  • C++ function call routes resolver

    - by Poni
    Hi! I'm looking for a tool that will tell/resolve for every function all the call paths (call it "routes") to it. For example: void deeper(int *pNumber) { *pNumber++; } void gateA(int *pNumber) { deeper(pNumber); } void gateB(int *pNumber) { gateA(pNumber); } void main() { int x = 123; gateA(&x); gateB(&x); } See? I need a tool that will tell me all the routes to deeper(), and more if possible. By saying "more" I mean that it will tell me if the pointer is the same as been provided to the calling function. This will greatly save me time. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • About memory and delete object in c++

    - by barssala
    I will give some examples and explain. First, I declare some object like CString* param = new CString[100] And when I declare this one, my memory would increase a little bit because it's some implemented string. Then I store this object in some list of CString just like List<CString> myList = new List<CString>; // new list of CString myList.add(param); This is my question: I wanna know, when I delete myList, my param isn't deleted, right? And memory in param still exists. Do I misunderstand?

    Read the article

  • Javascript Function wont submit form..

    - by Josh K
    Here is my function: function processCheck() { var numberClicked = 0; var frm = document.getElementById('form'); for (var i=0; i<form.elements.length; i++) { if (frm.elements[i].checked) numberClicked++; } if(numberClicked != 8) alert('Must choose 8 Teams'); else frm.submit(); } My forms name is 'form', here is my input: echo "<input type='button' name='submit' value='Update' onclick='processCheck()' />"; When i click the button and there is anything but 8 boxes selected it displays the alert, if there is 8 boxes it does nothing (<-- The problem). I have the form action set to another page.

    Read the article

  • PHP: "Footer function"?

    - by Ricket
    I have a project. It has a good number of PHP files. Each of these files includes a standard header. They don't include a standard footer. Now I want to do something just before the end of every page. I can go through each page and add the footer code, but I was wondering if there is an easier way (and I think I've seen something like it before, though I might be mistaken). Is there a way to set a "hook" or "trigger" function that will be executed at the end of a page, from the included header PHP script? I'm thinking of something like set_error_handler but to handle a page close event. Or like C's atexit function.

    Read the article

  • Why people define class, trait, object inside another object in Scala?

    - by Zwcat
    Ok, I'll explain why I ask this question. I begin to read Lift 2.2 source code these days. In Lift, I found that, define inner class and inner trait are very heavily used. object Menu has 2 inner traits and 4 inner classes. object Loc has 18 inner classes, 5 inner traits, 7 inner objects. There're tons of codes write like this. I wanna to know why the author write it like this. Is it because it's the author's personal taste or a powerful use of language feature?

    Read the article

  • Returning an array from an activity

    - by Boardy
    I am currently working on an android project and I want to be able to startActivityForResult so that I can return an array of. The array is an ArrayList<Spanned> lets say its called myArray. From what I've read I can't return an array directly from the activty using the set result so I was thinking that once the array has added all the data to the array, I can then call the toString function on it, i.e. myArray.toString(). If I do this, I have no idea how I can then convert this back into the original ArrayList<Spanned>. Thanks for any help you can provide.

    Read the article

  • How to cast/convert form Object in an byte[] array

    - by maddash
    I've got a maybe simple problem, but at the moment I am not able to solve it. I have an Object and I need to convert it into a byte[]. public byte[] GetMapiPropertyBytes(string propIdentifier) { return (byte[])this.GetMapiProperty(propIdentifier); //InvalidCastException } Exception: Unable to cast COM object of type 'System.__ComObject' to class type 'System.Byte[]'. Instances of types that represent COM components cannot be cast to types that do not represent COM components; however they can be cast to interfaces as long as the underlying COM component supports QueryInterface calls for the IID of the interface. So far so good - I've tried to serialize it, but I got another exception - NOT serializable Could someone help me? I need a method to convert it...

    Read the article

  • Creating methods with infinite overloads ? (.NET)

    - by MarceloRamires
    In C# you can do this: foo = string.Format("{0} {1} {2} {3} ...", "aa", "bb", "cc" ...); This method Format() accepts infinite parameters, being the first one how the string should be formatted and the rest are values to be put in the string. Today I've come to a situation where I had to get a set of strings and test them, then I remembered this language functionality, but I had no clue. After a few unsuccessful web searches, I've realised it would be more prudent to just get an array, which didn't make me quite satisfied. Q: How do I make a function that accepts infinite parameters? And how do I use it ?

    Read the article

  • How to assign one object to another in Linq c# without making new

    - by LLL
    I m facing issue in assiging one object to another in linq sql. In this example Func<result, result> make = q => new result { Id = q.Id, lName = q.lName, GroupId = q.GroupId, Age = (from tags in q.age where tags.Del == null && tags.lId == q.Id select age).ToEntitySet(), }; p = (from q in dc.results where q.Id == Id.Value select make(q)).First(); i am making new and assigning the object, but i dont want to do this, it will cause propblem in insertion. so i want to assign without making new, how is it possible?

    Read the article

  • Callback Timer function in C++

    - by user3596609
    I am trying to implement a callback timer function in C++ which should do a callback after a timeout. I am listening on a socket and then waiting for messages on it. so if I have something like getMessages() and I want to pass the timer function in it as an argument. So how can it be implemented that after the receive of a message, the timer is started and the callback happens if there is a timeout before the next messages arrives. I am new to callback functions. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • javascript object creating

    - by Md. Shohel Rana
    I have a javascript object like this var student = function () { this.id = 1; this.Name = "Shohel"; this.Roll = "04115407"; this.Session = "03-04"; this.Subject = "CSE"; }; and i have a javascript array list like this var students = []; now i want to push student into students, this is shown below students.push(new student()) //no prolem students.push(new student[id = 3]) //Problem here second line occurs exceptions, how can i push javascript object like as c# add list, which is representing second line? thanks

    Read the article

  • Calling a method on an object a bunch of times versus constructing an object a bunch of times

    - by Ami
    I have a List called myData and I want to apply a particular method (someFunction) to every element in the List. Is calling a method through an object's constructor slower than calling the same method many times for one particular object instantiation? In other words, is this: for(int i = 0; i < myData.Count; i++) myClass someObject = new myClass(myData[i]); slower than this: myClass someObject = new myClass(); for(int i = 0; i < myData.Count; i++) someObject.someFunction(myData[i]); ? If so, how much slower?

    Read the article

  • Anonymous functions IE issue/problem in Javascript

    - by Bragaadeesh
    Hi guys, I am having a javascript written like this. imageDiv.onclick = function(){xyz.deleteImage(param1, param2);return false;}; Now things are fine in Firefox, Chrome and Safari. But I have a strange issue in Internet Explorer. What happens is, when I click on the imageDiv in my page, the deleteImage() method is getting invoked twice. One being the actual deleteimage() method thats given here and another is the deleteimage() method that I have in the page. How to resolve this issue. Please help.

    Read the article

  • Cannot read function written in baseform

    - by Nana
    I have a program (aspx page) which inherits the baseform. My baseform has a function which validates a session. But currently, the program runs to the page and it didnt go through the baseform and read the function. I dont know where i go wrong. no error pop out. I build the page, still no error. Below is the code which i call the baseform. public partial class TAView : BaseForm { protected override void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (Page.IsPostBack == false) { base.Page_Load(sender,e); binddropdownlists(); } }

    Read the article

  • jquery .load() function only gets called once

    - by user1288099
    the html <div class="stackwrapper" id="user1"></div> <div class="stackwrapper" id="user2"></div> <div class="userdrawings"></div> the javascript $('.stackwrapper').click(function(e){ var id=$(this).attr('id'); $('.userdrawings').load('loadSession.php?user='+id).fadeIn("slow"); }); Somehow it only works at once, only at the first click on stackwrapper, when I click on the second one, the function is not triggered again.

    Read the article

  • How does * work in Python

    - by Deqing
    Just switched from C++ to Python, and found that sometimes it is a little hard to understand ideas behind Python. I guess, a variable is a reference to the real object. For example, a=(1,2,5) meaning a - (1,2,5), so if b=a, then b and a are 2 references pointing to the same (1,2,5). It is a little like pointers in C/C++. If I have: def foo(a,b,c): print a,b,c a=(1,3,5) foo(*a) What does * mean here? Looks like it expands tuple a to a[0], a[1] and a[2]. But why print(*a) is not working while print(a[0],a[1],a[2]) works fine?

    Read the article

  • How to determine magnitude of trigonometric function? C++

    - by seaworthy
    > if (((test>=0) && (test<=90)) || ((test>270) && (test<=360))){n_y=1;} > else {n_y=-1;} I need the magnitude of trigonometric function in order to determine the sign of the trigonometric function for an angle falling into a particular quadrant. My plan is to replace the code above with something equivalent. Here is what I want to do in pseudo-code. n_y = cos(test) / (magnitude of cos (test)); This will give me same thing. Abs() only takes integers. Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226  | Next Page >