Search Results

Search found 15364 results on 615 pages for 'static assert'.

Page 221/615 | < Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >

  • "Right" way to deallocate an std::vector object

    - by Jacob
    The first solution is: std::vector<int> *vec = new std::vector<int>; assert(vec != NULL); // ... delete vec; An alternative is: std::vector<int> v; //... vec.clear(); vec.swap(std::vector<int>(vec)); The second solution's a bit of a trick --- what's the "right" way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Receive messages for derived types in MVVMLight

    - by Hrvoje
    Shouldn't this test pass: [TestMethod] public void derived_message_subscription() { bool handled = false; Messenger.Default.Register<GenericMessage<baseClass>>(this, true, (msg) => handled = true); Messenger.Default.Send(new GenericMessage<testClass>(new testClass())); Assert.IsTrue(handled); } public abstract class baseClass { } public class testClass : baseClass { } I have to receive all messages for classes that inherits from one base class. MVVMLight has bool property receiveDerivedMessagesToo in Register method, but it seems to me that it isn't working.

    Read the article

  • How to leave out some statements while executing java code?

    - by iamrohitbanga
    In C++ if we do not want some statements to compile into code that ships like assert function calls, we control their compilation through #ifndef preprocessor directives. How do we do this in Java? I have some System.out.println() statements for debugging which I would like to remove for the final code. one way is to make them execute conditionally under the affect of a boolean variable. Is there a better way of doing this? As I have a java swing application I can turn off the System.out.println statements without affecting the output. What is the method of doing this?

    Read the article

  • How to look up an NHibernate entity's table mapping from the type of the entity?

    - by snicker
    Once I've mapped my domain in NHibernate, how can I reverse lookup those mappings somewhere else in my code? Example: The entity Pony is mapped to a table named "AAZF1203" for some reason. (Stupid legacy database table names!) I want to find out that table name from the NH mappings using only the typeof(Pony) because I have to write a query elsewhere. How can I make the following test pass? private const string LegacyPonyTableName = "AAZF1203"; [Test] public void MakeSureThatThePonyEntityIsMappedToCorrectTable() { string ponyTable = GetNHibernateTableMappingFor(typeof(Pony)); Assert.AreEqual(LegacyPonyTableName, ponyTable); } In other words, what does the GetNHibernateTableMappingFor(Type t) need to look like?

    Read the article

  • Is there a Java unit-test framework that auto-tests getters and setters?

    - by Michael Easter
    There is a well-known debate in Java (and other communities, I'm sure) whether or not trivial getter/setter methods should be tested. Usually, this is with respect to code coverage. Let's agree that this is an open debate, and not try to answer it here. There have been several blog posts on using Java reflection to auto-test such methods. Does any framework (e.g. jUnit) provide such a feature? e.g. An annotation that says "this test T should auto-test all the getters/setters on class C, because I assert that they are standard". It seems to me that it would add value, and if it were configurable, the 'debate' would be left as an option to the user.

    Read the article

  • How to know who kills my threads

    - by mcabral
    I got a thread that is just banishing.. i'd like to know who is killing my thread and why. It occurs to me my thread is being killed by the OS, but i'd like to confirm this and if possible to know why it's killing it. As for the thread, i can assert it has at least 40 min of execution before dying, but it suddenly dies around 5 min. public void RunWorker() { Thread worker = new Thread(delegate() { DoSomethingForALongLongTime(); }); worker.IsBackground = true; worker.SetApartmentState(System.Threading.ApartmentState.STA); worker.Start(); }

    Read the article

  • How a web app identify if a click came from another web app via code?

    - by Diego
    Hi, we have a web application that users can take online reports from ou ERP system data... And we have another web application that is used by our teachers and employees. We can't change the ERP web app because its a closed DLL, in this case we made some extended functionality in our custom internal web app and we are willing to put this functionality on the "menu" of the ERP web app. I need to integrate the two applications in the following way: When I click in the menu of the ERP web app, I want that our internal web app assert that the click have come from our ERP web app and not typed in the URL, this is possible?

    Read the article

  • How to encode and decode chinese characters?

    - by melaos
    I've try googling around but wasn't able to find what charset that this text below belongs to: 具有éœé›»ç”¢ç”Ÿè£ç½®ä¹‹å½±åƒè¼¸å…¥è£ç½® But putting <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" Content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> and keeping that string into a html file i was able to view the chinese character wording properly. which is: ??????????????? So my question is: what tools can i use to detect the character set of those text? And how do i convert/encode/decode them properly in C#? Updates: Added some test code [TestMethod] public void TestMethod1() { string encodedText = "具有éœé›»ç”¢ç”Ÿè£ç½®ä¹‹å½±åƒè¼¸å…¥è£ç½®"; Encoding encoder = new UTF8Encoding(); byte[] postBytes = encoder.GetBytes(encodedText); postBytes = UTF8Encoding.Convert(Encoding.UTF8, Encoding.Unicode, postBytes); string decodedText = Encoding.Unicode.GetString(postBytes); Assert.AreNotEqual(encodedText, decodedText); } thanks

    Read the article

  • Getting a Type variable knowing the name of type C#

    - by StuffHappens
    Hello! I'm developing a TypeTranslator class which has a method Type TranslateType(Type type). This method gets a type of an interface and if there's a class of interface name without leading I it creates it, otherwise an exception is raised. Here's some code to clearify what's written before: class Program { interface IAnimal { } class Animal : IAnimal { } void Function() { TypeTranslator typeTranslator = new TypeTranslator(); Assert(typeTranslator.TranslateType(typeof(IAnimal) == typeof(Animal))); } } Is it possible to get what I want? Thank you for your help!

    Read the article

  • testing controller action which returns RedirectToRouteResult

    - by csetzkorn
    Hi, I have an action in my controller: RedirectToRouteResult Create(UserDTO UserDTO) Which at some point decides with which HTML to respond after a post request by redirecting to an action: return ModelState.IsValid ? RedirectToAction("ThanksCreate") : RedirectToAction("Register"); In my unit tests I would like to get hold of the ‘views’ modelstate somehow like this: var modelState = result.ViewData.ModelState; Assert.IsFalse( modelState.IsValid ); where ‘result’ (ViewResult) is the result of the action ‘Create’ depending on the submitted DTO. My dilemma is that my action ‘returns’ a RedirectToRouteResult which I thought is quite nice but it might not be testable or is it? How could I get hold of the ModelState in my scenario? Thanks. Best wishes, Christian enter code here

    Read the article

  • PHPUnit test for error thrown with wrong argument type

    - by Spencer Mark
    I'm just starting with PHPUnit and am ok with all assert* methods, but can't figure out how to test for error thrown when the wrong argument is provided to the method - say hinted with array like so: public function(array $list) { } and then tested with null as argument. Could someone please provide an example of how to test for this sort of errors? I've checked quite a few posts on stackoverflow, but couldn't find the answer to this specific issue. Edit Ok - just to give you an idea of what I'm testing - here's the ArrayHelper::removeIfValueIsEmpty() method: public static function removeIfValueIsEmpty(array $array) { if (empty($array)) { return array(); } return array_filter($array, function($value) { return !Helper::isEmpty($value); }); } and now test: class ArrayHelperTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase { public function testRemoveIfValueIsEmpty() { $this->assertEmpty( \Cmd\Helper\ArrayHelper::removeIfValueIsEmpty(null), '\Cmd\Helper\ArrayHelper::removeIfValueIsEmpty method failed (checking with null as argument)' ); } } This throws an error: PHPUnit_Framework_Error : Argument 1 passed to Cmd\Helper\ArrayHelper::removeIfValueIsEmpty() must be of the type array, null given

    Read the article

  • VHDL Simulation Timing Behaviour

    - by chris
    I'm trying to write some VHDL code that simply feeds sequential bits from a std_logic_vector into a model of an FSM. However, the bits don't seem to be updating correctly. To try figure out the issue, I have the following code, where instead of getting a bit out of a vector, I'm just toggling the signal x (the same place I'd be getting a bit out). clk <= NOT clk after 10 ns; process(clk) begin if count = 8 then assert false report "Simulation ended" severity failure; elsif (clk = '1') then x <= test1(count); count <= count + 1; end if; end process; EDIT: It appears I was confused.I've put it back to trying to take bit by bit out of the vector. This is the output. I would have thought that on when count is 1, x would take on the value of test1(1) which is a 1.

    Read the article

  • created persisted computed columns when the user defined scalar function appears to be non-determini

    - by Ralph Shillington
    I have a scalar UDF that I know to be deterministic, however SQL doesn't. Is there a way to declare it as deterministic so that I can then use it in a persisted computed column definition? further clarification: The purpose of this exercise is that I need to harvest out specific values from an XML column on the row. I can't use the value method of the xml column in my computed column definition, but I can use it in a UDF. I know the xpath query in the value method will produce the same output give the same input so while I certainly understand that not all calls to value will be deterministic I want to assert that mine is.

    Read the article

  • Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation

    - by Lefteris Gkinis
    Now I use the following code: Public Function SetACL(ByVal filename As String, ByVal account As String, ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) As Boolean Try Dim rule As FileSystemAccessRule = New FileSystemAccessRule(account, FileSystemRights.Write, AccessControlType.Allow) Dim fp As PermissionSet = New PermissionSet(Permissions.PermissionState.Unrestricted) fp.AddPermission(New FileIOPermission(FileIOPermissionAccess.Read, filename)) fp.AddPermission(New FileIOPermission(FileIOPermissionAccess.Write, filename)) fp.AddPermission(New FileIOPermission(FileIOPermissionAccess.PathDiscovery, filename)) fp.Assert() Dim di As DirectoryInfo = New DirectoryInfo(Path.GetDirectoryName(filename)) SetACL = False Dim security As DirectorySecurity = di.GetAccessControl(AccessControlSections.Access) security.ModifyAccessRule(AccessControlModification.Add, rule, SetACL) di.SetAccessControl(security) Return SetACL Catch ex As Exception MessageBox.Show(ex.Message, "Set Security Sub", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Stop) Finalize() End Try End Function The Error of 'Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation' comes when i'm trying to execute the instraction Dim security As DirectorySecurity = di.GetAccessControl(AccessControlSections.Access) Please if anybody knows why that error comes here to respond

    Read the article

  • Method parameters have incorrect values when using RowTest in VB.Net

    - by simon_bellis
    Hello, I have the following test method (VB.NET) <RowTest()> _ <Row(1, 2, 3)> _ Public Sub AddMultipleNumbers(ByVal number1 As Integer, ByVal number2 As Integer, ByVal result As Integer) Dim dvbc As VbClass = New VbClass() Dim actual As Integer = dvbc.Add(number1, number2) Assert.That(actual, [Is].SameAs(result)) End Sub My problem is that when the test runs, using TestDriven.Net, the three method parameters are 0 and not the values I am expecting. I have referenced the NUnit.Framework (v.2.5.3.9345) anf the NUnitExtension.RowTest (v.1.2.3.0).

    Read the article

  • Typechecking macro arguments in C

    - by Rocketmagnet
    Hi all, Is is possible to typecheck arguments to a #define macro? For example: typedef enum { REG16_A, REG16_B, REG16_C }REG16; #define read_16(reg16) read_register_16u(reg16); \ assert(typeof(reg16)==typeof(REG16)); The above code doesn't seem to work. What am I doing wrong? BTW, I am using gcc, and I can guarantee that I will always be using gcc in this project. The code does not need to be portable.

    Read the article

  • Creating a System.Windows.Controls.Image throws an exception - how do I use the dispatcher to instan

    - by Scott Whitlock
    I'm running my unit tests on a piece of code that does the following in the test: Assert.IsNotNull(target.Icon); Inside the getter for the Icon property, I'm doing this: System.Windows.Controls.Image img = new System.Windows.Controls.Image(); That's throwing this exception: System.InvalidOperationException : The calling thread must be STA, because many UI components require this. I understand what that means, and I understand that I need to use the Dispatcher, but I'm a bit confused about how or why... this is a property of my ViewModel and I don't get any of these exceptions when running the application. Other info: this only started failing when I upgraded to .NET 4.

    Read the article

  • PHP file modification time in milliseconds

    - by Steven Rosato
    I there, I am currently writing a unit test which asserts that a file did not get modified. The test code execution takes less than one second and therefore I would like to know if it is possible to retrieve the file modification time in milliseconds. filemtime() function returns the UNIX timestamp in seconds. My current solution is using the sleep(1) function which will assure me that 1 second passed before checking if it was modified or not. I don't like that solution since it slows down the test by a great deal. I cannot assert the content equality via get_file_contents() since the data that can be rewritten would be the same. I am guessing it is impossible, is it?

    Read the article

  • Mock Objects properties not changing

    - by frictionlesspulley
    I am new to using Mock test in .Net. I am testing out a financial transaction which is of the following nature: int amt =20; //sets all the props and func and returns a FinaceAccount. //Note I did not SetUp the amt of the account. var account =GetFinanceAccount() //service layer to be tested _financeService.tranx(account,amt); //checks if the amt was added to the account.amt //here the amt comes out same as that set in GetFinanceAccount. Assert.AreEqual(account.amt ,amt) I know that the function tranx works correctly but there is an issue with the test. Are there any GOOD reference material on Mocking in .Net

    Read the article

  • How to leave out some System.out/logging statements while executing java code?

    - by iamrohitbanga
    In C++ if we do not want some statements to compile into code that ships like assert function calls, we control their compilation through #ifndef preprocessor directives. How do we do this in Java? I have some System.out.println() statements for debugging which I would like to remove for the final code. one way is to make them execute conditionally under the affect of a boolean variable. Is there a better way of doing this? As I have a java swing application I can turn off the System.out.println statements without affecting the output. What is the method of doing this?

    Read the article

  • How can I double-enhance a class with cglib?

    - by artemb
    Hi there! Here's the code: Patient patient = factory.createPatient(); Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer(); enhancer.setSuperclass(patient.getClass()); enhancer.setCallback(new DefaultMethodInterceptor(patient)); patient = (Patient) enhancer.create(); assertThat(patient.getFirstName()).isNotNull(); Enhancer enhancer2 = new Enhancer(); enhancer2.setSuperclass(patient.getClass()); enhancer2.setCallback(new DefaultMethodInterceptor(patient)); patient = (Patient) enhancer2.create(); assertThat(patient.getFirstName()).isNotNull(); It fails on the last assert with net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException-->null ... Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException ... Caused by: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Duplicate method name&signature in class file my/package/entity/Patient$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$ca1e6685$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$f52743be I ask this because I want to enhance Hibernate's entities, but sometimes it returns already enhanced ones by itself and my second enhancement fails. How can I avoid this?

    Read the article

  • possible implementations of casting in c++

    - by lego69
    I have this snippet of the code in my header: class A { private: int player; public: A(int initPlayer = 0); A(const A&); A& operator=(const A&); ~A(); void foo() const; friend int operator==(const A& i, const A& member) const; }; implementation of the operator== int operator==(const A& i, const A& member) const{ if(i.player == member.player){ return 1; } return 0; } and I need casting for this part of my code: A *pa1 = new A(a2); assert(i == *pa1); i - is some int, which my function receives I receive an error non-member function, How can I fix it? thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Symfony 2 form repeated validation in Entity with annotation

    - by Sukhrob
    My question is "How can I do form repeated validation in Entity with annotation?". I have an Account entity with (email, password and confirmPassword) attributes. When a new user registers a new account, he/she has to fill in email, password and confirmPassword fields. Obviously, password and confirmPassword fields must match. I saw an example of this validation with pure php (form builder) in Stachoverflow like below. $builder->add('password', 'repeated', array( 'type' => 'password', 'first_name' => 'Password', 'second_name' => 'Password confirmation', 'invalid_message' => 'Passwords are not the same', )); But, this is not what I want. I want this functionality with annotation in my Account entity. Maybe * @Assert\Match( * matchField = "password", * message = "The password confirmation does not match password." * ) protected $confirmPassword;

    Read the article

  • JUnit - assertSame

    - by Michael
    Can someone tell me why assertSame() do fail when I use values 127? import static org.junit.Assert.*; ... @Test public void StationTest1() { .. assertSame(4, 4); // OK assertSame(10, 10); // OK assertSame(100, 100); // OK assertSame(127, 127); // OK assertSame(128, 128); // raises an junit.framework.AssertionFailedError! assertSame(((int) 128),((int) 128)); // also junit.framework.AssertionFailedError! } I'm using JUnit 4.8.1.

    Read the article

  • <hash_set> equality operator doesn't work in VS2010

    - by ProgramWriter
    Sample code: std::hash_set<int> hs1; // also i try std::unorded_set<int> - same effect std::hash_set<int> hs2; hs1.insert(15); hs1.insert(20); hs2.insert(20); hs2.insert(15); assert(hs1 == hs2); hash_set doesn't stores elements in some order defined by hash function... why? Please note that this code works in VS2008 using stdext::hash_set.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >