Search Results

Search found 19474 results on 779 pages for 'xml validation'.

Page 223/779 | < Previous Page | 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230  | Next Page >

• How to validates cyrilic email in Rails 3.1?

  - by iKeler

  Let's say I had the email address like putin-crab@?????????.?? How to validate that address in rails 3.1? My Model(i use Mongoid): #encoding: utf-8 class User include Mongoid::Document field :email, :type => String validates :email, :presence => true, :format => { :with => RFC822::EMAIL } end For validations reqexp i use gem https://github.com/dim/rfc-822 in rails console (normal email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :001 > usr = User.new( :email => "[email protected]" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627cf4934db7e4d000001, _type: nil, email: "[email protected]"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :002 > usr.valid? => true in rails console (fu@#ing email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :003 > usr = User.new( :email => "putin-crab@?????????.??" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627f44934db7e4d000002, _type: nil, email: "putin-crab@?????????.??"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :004 > usr.valid? Encoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible encoding regexp match (ASCII-8BIT regexp with UTF-8 string) from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `=~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `!~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `validate_each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:153:in `block in validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:302:in `_callback_before_13' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:404:in `_run_validate_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:212:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `block in run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:390:in `_run_validation_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:179:in `valid?' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/validations.rb:70:in `valid?' from (irb):4 from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:45:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:8:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands.rb:40:in `<top (required)>' from script/rails:6:in `require'

  Read the article

• PHP strlen question

  - by MrEnder

  Ok I am checking that a string is at least 4 characters long and 25 or less characters short I tried to use strlen like this $userNameSignupLength = strlen($userNameSignup); else if($userNameSignupLength<4 && $userNameSignupLength>25) { $userNameSignupError = "Must be between 4 to 25 characters long"; } but it doesn't work... what did I do wrong?

  Read the article

• How to keep views free of authorization logic in mvc?

  - by David Lay

  I have a view to display a list of items. The user can edit, delete or create new items, but according to their authorizations they may or may not be allowed to do some of this actions. I have the requirement to display only the actions which the current user is allowed to do, but I don't want to clutter the views with authorization if-else's Despise of being a very common requirement, I can't find a real satisfactory way of doing it. My best approach so far is to provide an overload to the Html.ActionLink extension method that takes the permission to ask for, but there are going to be more complex scenarios, like hiding entire blocks of html or switching a textbox for a label+hidden. Is there a better way to do this?

  Read the article

• Override ModelState.IsValid Property

  - by griegs

  How can I override the IsValid property? I have a model that's validating as false. I have a custom ValidationAttribute on the model and I'd like to set the IsValid flag for the whole model under certain circumstances. Is this possible?

  Read the article

• Validate Linq2Sql before SubmitChanges()

  - by Nick Gotch

  Can anyone tell me if/how you can validate the changes in a data context in Linq2Sql before calling SubmitChanges(). The situation I have is that I create a context, perform multiple operations and add many inserts alongside other processing tasks and then rollback if the submit fails. What I'd prefer to do is make some kind of "Validate()" call after certain tasks are done so that I can handle it before submitting the entire job.

  Read the article

• Xml reader creation problem

  - by diver-d

  Hi there, I am having some troubles trying to allow my WCF service to process a larger string. I keep getting the following error. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader My App.config looks like this <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <system.web> <compilation debug="true" /> </system.web> <!-- When deploying the service library project, the content of the config file must be added to the host's app.config file. System.Configuration does not support config files for libraries. --> <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <wsHttpBinding> <binding name="wsHttpBindingSettings" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="2147483647" maxStringContentLength="2147483647" maxArrayLength="2147483647" maxBytesPerRead="2147483647" maxNameTableCharCount="2147483647" /> </binding> </wsHttpBinding> </bindings> <services> <service name="WCFLongString.Service1" > <endpoint address="" binding="wsHttpBinding" contract="WCFLongString.IService1" bindingConfiguration="wsHttpBindingSettings"> <identity> <dns value="localhost" /> </identity> </endpoint> <endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" /> <host> <baseAddresses> <add baseAddress="http://localhost:8732/Design_Time_Addresses/WCFLongString/Service1/" /> </baseAddresses> </host> </service> </services> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior> <!-- To avoid disclosing metadata information, set the value below to false and remove the metadata endpoint above before deployment --> <serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="True"/> <!-- To receive exception details in faults for debugging purposes, set the value below to true. Set to false before deployment to avoid disclosing exception information --> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="False" /> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> </system.serviceModel> </configuration> Am I missing something here?

  Read the article

• Incorrect XML produced by SUDS

  - by Ben

  Hi, I am trying to talk to a SOAP web service using SUDS and Python. After lots of messing around learning Python (yes I am new to this) and working out how to use SUDS I have come across a problem. The signature of the web method I am calling, according to suds, is (FWTCaseCreate){ ClassificationEventCode = None Priority = None Title = None Description = None Queue = None DueDate = None AssociatedObject = (FWTObjectBriefDetails){ ObjectID = (FWTObjectID){ ObjectType = None ObjectReference[] = <empty> } ObjectDescription = None Details = None Category = None } Form = (FWTCaseForm){ FormField[] = <empty> FormName = None FormKey = None } Internal = None InteractionID = None XCoord = None YCoord = None } So I use SUDS to create the classes that I want and send it to the method. However I get an error. So I turned logging on and I can see that the XML that is being sent is not correct which is causing a deserialize error. The SOAP package looks like the following <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:ns0="http://www.lagan.com/wsdl/FLTypes" xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <SOAP-ENV:Header> <wsse:Security> <wsse:BinarySecurityToken>eaadf1ddff99a8</wsse:BinarySecurityToken> </wsse:Security> </SOAP-ENV:Header> <ns1:Body> <ns0:FWTCaseCreate> <ClassificationEventCode> <ClassificationEventCode>2000023</ClassificationEventCode> <Priority>1</Priority> <Title>testing</Title> <Description>testing</Description> <Queue/> <Internal>True</Internal> <XCoord>356570</XCoord> <YCoord>168708</YCoord> </ClassificationEventCode> </ns0:FWTCaseCreate> </ns1:Body> As you can see there is a 'ClassificationEventCode' element around all the other elements, this should not be there. If I cut and paste this xml into SOAPUI and first remove this element and then post it directly to the web service it works successfully. Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? I guess SUDS thinks that it should be there based on the WSDL. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Regular Expression to validate a timestamp

  - by Mohit Nanda

  Hi, I need a regular expression to validate a timestamp of the format, using Javascript: YYYY/MM/DD HH:MI:SS I tried cooking up a few, but seems my regex skills fail to cover something or other. Please give me a reference or way to do it. P.S. : I mention regex, only as a suggestion. Im using Javascript and welcome any alternative.

  Read the article

• Ruby email_veracity_checker getting Recipient OK for invalid emails

  - by digger69

  I was testing out email_veracity_checker from rails console and found that when I tested a google apps domain (w/ catchall), yahoo and another company domain, the smtp server always returned 250 recipient ok for invalid emails (wellformed, but bogus). It seems that these servers are always returning OK perhaps to prevent email harvesting. But it does seem to raise the question 'why even validate up-front', is this approach even valid in today's environment? Note: gmail did return 550 email account doesn't exist for invalid. related to How check if an email exist without send in Ruby? Use of email_veracity_checker send-in-ruby-use-of-email-veracity-checker I appreciate your thoughts.

  Read the article

• DDD: Client-side script to enforce invariants

  - by Mosh

  Hello, One thing that I'm confused about in regards to DDD is that our domain is supposed to handle all business logic and enforce invariants. I have noticed some people (me included) handle certain invariants in the presentation layer (i.e. WebForms, Views, etc) with javascript. This is mainly done to improve performance so the server is not hit for every request which may be invalid. Even though this approach may be beneficial performance-wise, it violates DDD principles. What if the business rules are changed? This way we don't have a rich domain where all the business rules are captured. In case of a change, we should change the domain as well as the presentation layer. Has anyone come across this situation before? I'd like to know your thoughts on this. Cheers, Mosh

  Read the article

• MessageBox if Recordset Update is Successful

  - by Paolo Bernasconi

  In Access 2007, I have a form to add a new contact to a table: RecSet.AddNew RecSet![Code_Personal] = Me.txtCodePersonal.Value RecSet![FName] = Me.TxtFName.Value RecSet![LName] = Me.txtLName.Value RecSet![Tel Natel] = Me.txtNatTel.Value RecSet![Tel Home] = Me.txtHomeTel.Value RecSet![Email] = Me.txtEmail.Value RecSet.Update This has worked so far, and the contact has successfully been aded. But I'm having two problems: I want to display a messagebox to tell the user the contact was successfully added If the contact was not successfully added because A contact with this name already exists A different issue Then display a message box "Contact already exists" or "error occured" respectively. My idea of doing this is: If recSet.Update = true Then MsgBox "Paolo Bernasconi was successfully added" Else if RecSet![FName] & RecSet![LName] 'already exist in table MsgBox "Contact already exists" Else MsgBox "An unknown error occured" I know this code is wrong, and obviously doesn't work, but it's just to give you an idea of what I'm trying to achieve. Thanks for all your help in advance.

  Read the article

• Can I copy/clone a function in JavaScript?

  - by Craig Stuntz

  I'm using jQuery with the validators plugin. I would like to replace the "required" validator with one of my own. This is easy: jQuery.validator.addMethod("required", function(value, element, param) { return myRequired(value, element, param); }, jQuery.validator.messages.required); So far, so good. This works just fine. But what I really want to do is call my function in some cases, and the default validator for the rest. Unfortunately, this turns out to be recursive: jQuery.validator.addMethod("required", function(value, element, param) { // handle comboboxes with empty guids if (someTest(element)) { return myRequired(value, element, param); } return jQuery.validator.methods.required(value, element, param); }, jQuery.validator.messages.required); I looked at the source code for the validators, and the default implementation of "required" is defined as an anonymous method at jQuery.validator.messages.required. So there is no other (non-anonymous) reference to the function that I can use. Storing a reference to the function externally before calling addMethod and calling the default validator via that reference makes no difference. What I really need to do is to be able to copy the default required validator function by value instead of by reference. But after quite a bit of searching, I can't figure out how to do that. Is it possible? If it's impossible, then I can copy the source for the original function. But that creates a maintenance problem, and I would rather not do that unless there is no "better way."

  Read the article

• How do I validate numbers in Javascript?

  - by rythmvasu

  How to validate a numeric numbers?

  Read the article

• Unable to verify body hash for DKIM

  - by Joshua

  I'm writing a C# DKIM validator and have come across a problem that I cannot solve. Right now I am working on calculating the body hash, as described in Section 3.7 Computing the Message Hashes. I am working with emails that I have dumped using a modified version of EdgeTransportAsyncLogging sample in the Exchange 2010 Transport Agent SDK. Instead of converting the emails when saving, it just opens a file based on the MessageID and dumps the raw data to disk. I am able to successfully compute the body hash of the sample email provided in Section A.2 using the following code: SHA256Managed hasher = new SHA256Managed(); ASCIIEncoding asciiEncoding = new ASCIIEncoding(); string rawFullMessage = File.ReadAllText(@"C:\Repositories\Sample-A.2.txt"); string headerDelimiter = "\r\n\r\n"; int headerEnd = rawFullMessage.IndexOf(headerDelimiter); string header = rawFullMessage.Substring(0, headerEnd); string body = rawFullMessage.Substring(headerEnd + headerDelimiter.Length); byte[] bodyBytes = asciiEncoding.GetBytes(body); byte[] bodyHash = hasher.ComputeHash(bodyBytes); string bodyBase64 = Convert.ToBase64String(bodyHash); string expectedBase64 = "2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8="; Console.WriteLine("Expected hash: {1}{0}Computed hash: {2}{0}Are equal: {3}", Environment.NewLine, expectedBase64, bodyBase64, expectedBase64 == bodyBase64); The output from the above code is: Expected hash: 2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8= Computed hash: 2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8= Are equal: True Now, most emails come across with the c=relaxed/relaxed setting, which requires you to do some work on the body and header before hashing and verifying. And while I was working on it (failing to get it to work) I finally came across a message with c=simple/simple which means that you process the whole body as is minus any empty CRLF at the end of the body. (Really, the rules for Body Canonicalization are quite ... simple.) Here is the real DKIM email with a signature using the simple algorithm (with only unneeded headers cleaned up). Now, using the above code and updating the expectedBase64 hash I get the following results: Expected hash: VnGg12/s7xH3BraeN5LiiN+I2Ul/db5/jZYYgt4wEIw= Computed hash: ISNNtgnFZxmW6iuey/3Qql5u6nflKPTke4sMXWMxNUw= Are equal: False The expected hash is the value from the bh= field of the DKIM-Signature header. Now, the file used in the second test is a direct raw output from the Exchange 2010 Transport Agent. If so inclined, you can view the modified EdgeTransportLogging.txt. At this point, no matter how I modify the second email, changing the start position or number of CRLF at the end of the file I cannot get the files to match. What worries me is that I have been unable to validate any body hash so far (simple or relaxed) and that it may not be feasible to process DKIM through Exchange 2010.

  Read the article

• Data validate tools (ETL tools) for SQL server

  - by Stan

  I have some data in Excel and need to import into database. Is there any tool that can validate and maybe clean the data? Does Red Gate have such tool? The input will be Excel. Given table constraints, eg. CHECK, UNIQUE KEY, datetime format, NOT NULL. Desire output should be as least shows which lines are having problems, and then fix some trivial error automatically, like fill in default value for NULL columns, automatically correct datetime format. I know using Python can build such a script. But just wonder what's the popular way to do this. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Display a boolean model field in a django form as a radio button rather than the default Checkbox.

  - by Lakshman Prasad

  This is how I went about, to display a Boolean model field in the form as Radio buttons Yes and No. choices = ( (1,'Yes'), (0,'No'), ) class EmailEditForm(forms.ModelForm): #Display radio buttons instead of checkboxes to_send_form = forms.ChoiceField(choices=choices,widget=forms.RadioSelect) class Meta: model = EmailParticipant fields = ('to_send_email','to_send_form') def clean(self): """ A workaround as the cleaned_data seems to contain u'1' and u'0'. There may be a better way. """ self.cleaned_data['to_send_form'] = int(self.cleaned_data['to_send_form']) return self.cleaned_data As you can see in the code above, I need a clean method that converts input string to an integer, which may be unnecessary. Is there a better and/or djangoic way to do this. If so, how? And no, using BooleanField seems to cause a lot more problems. Using that seemed obvious to me; but it isn't. Why is it so.

  Read the article

• How to decompress/inflate an XML response from ASP

  - by krisg

  Can anyone provide some insight into how i'd go about decompressing an XML response in classic ASP. We've been handed some code and asked to get it working: Set oXMLHttp = Server.CreateObject("MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP") URL = HttpServer + re_domain + ".do;jsessionid=" + ue_session + "?" + data oXMLHttp.setTimeouts 5000, 60000, 1200000, 1200000 oXMLHttp.open "GET", URL, false oXMLHttp.setRequestHeader "Accept-Encoding", "gzip" oXMLHttp.send() if oXMLHttp.status = 200 Then if oXMLHttp.responseText = "" then htmlrequest_get = "Empty Response from Server" else htmlrequest_get = oXMLHttp.responseText end if else ... Apparently now that the response is compressed using gzip, we have to un-compress the XML response before we can start to work with the data. How should i go about this?

  Read the article

• Rails: ValidationReflection and Formtastic not working together

  - by user336777

  I installed validation_reflection as a gem and out of the box it picked up on my validates_presence_of validations. But it is not picking up on any of the other default rails validations such as validates_format_of. I know from the documentation that i am supposed to add something like: config.reflected_validations << :validates_format_of to my config/plugins/validation_reflection.rb file (which didn't exist initially). I did this but nothing changed (i restarted the web server in between). I am not sure if it just isn't picking up on my file and loading validation_reflection.rb or if i have done something wrong. Anyone have any insights?

  Read the article

• C# Process flow - Datastream, XML and datagrid

  - by Farstucker

  Im looking for some advice/suggestions on how I should setup the work flow of a small application Im building. When the application is launched the datagrid will be populated via the XML file. Once running the application will receive a datastream that I hope to update the file and datagrid. So Im curious what you would suggest on how I setup the workflow (ie, split the data from the data stream and simultaneously populate the file and grid or would you suggest populating the XML file first and setting up a timer to have the grid read the file?) Im really looking for optimal performance.

  Read the article

• What is the regular expression for valdating a 'price' in a jtextfield

  - by wniroshan

  I want to validate a jtextfield as user inputs a price of some item. I have a perfectly working code which beeps and discard if user inputs some character that doesnt match the regular expression.(for regular expression "[0-9]+" it accepts any number of digits and beeps if a letter is given as input) But the problem is I want to validate an input like "12500.00". Format should be any number of digits before decimal point and two digits after the decimal point. eg: ddd.dd I tried the following regular expression. But the i doesnt allow user to input "." character. It allows user to input any number of digits but when "." key is pressed input is not accepted. here is the regular expression I used. "[0-9]+ | [0-9]+. | [0-9]+.[0-9]{1} | [0-9]+{2}" important: user input is validated character by character as the user inputs them to the jtextfield.

  Read the article

• why isn't my validator working?

  - by Lina

  hi, can anybody tell me why is the following code not working? <script type="text/javascript" src="../../Scripts/jquery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="../../Scripts/jquery.validate.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { // validate contact form on keyup and submit $("#myform").validate({ //set the rules for the fild names rules: { hour: { required: true, minlength: 2, range:[0,23] }, minute: { required: true, minlength: 2, range:[0,60] }, }, //set messages to appear inline messages: { hour: "Please enter a valid hour", minute: "Please enter a valid minute" } }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> .error { color: red; font: 12pt verdana; padding-left: 10px } </style> <form id="myform" method="" action=""> <input id="hour" type="text" name="hour" style="width:30px; text-align:center;"></input> : <input id="minute" type="text" name="minute" style="width:30px; text-align:center;"></input> <br/> <input type="submit" value="Validate!" /> </form> thanks a million in advance, Lina

  Read the article

• Validate data using DataAnnotations with WPF & Entity Framework?

  - by Shimmy

  Hello is thee any way to validate using Data Using DataAnnotations in WPF & Entity Framework?

  Read the article

• IValidator.Validate method and adding error message to a custom type

  - by user102533

  I have several server controls that implement the IValidator interface. As such, they have their own Validate() methods that look like this. public void Validate() { this.IsValid = true; if (someConditionFails()) { ErrorMessage = "Condition failed!"; this.IsValid = false; } } I understand that these Validate() methods are executed on postback before the load completed event that is executed before the save button's event handler. What I would like to do is pass in a reference to an instance of a custom class that collects all the error messages that I can access from Save button event handler. In other words, I would like to do something like this: public void Validate(ref SummaryOfErrorMessages sum) I guess I can't do this as the signature is different from what the IValidator interface has. The other option I can think of is on Load Completed event, I would iterate through all the validators on page, get the ones with IsValid = false and create my SummaryOfErrorMessages there. Does this sound right? Is there a better way of doing it?

  Read the article

• posting XML request in java

  - by shil

  how do i post an XML request to a URL using HTTP Post and retrieve the response?

  Read the article

• Registration Form check PostgreSQL is username is already taken

  - by MrEnder

  Hey I'm really new to PHP and PostgreSQP or any database in that matter. So I'm at a loss how to do this. I need an if statement that says. If(the username user just typed in is already in database) { my code here } the variable the username that the user just typed in is $userNameSignup how would I do that with PHP for PostgreSQL? also how might I redirect people to a new page once they have completed the form properly? Thanks Shelby

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230  | Next Page >