Search Results

Search found 111084 results on 4444 pages for 'linq to sql code generato'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 224/4444 | < Previous Page | 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231  | Next Page >

  • Linq query challenge - can this be done?

    - by vdh_ant
    My table structure is as follows: Person 1-M PesonAddress Person 1-M PesonPhone Person 1-M PesonEmail Person 1-M Contract Contract M-M Program Contract M-1 Organization At the end of this query I need a populated object graph where each person has their: PesonAddress's PesonPhone's PesonEmail's PesonPhone's Contract's - and this has its respective Program's Now I had the following query and I thought that it was working great, but it has a couple of problems: from people in ctx.People.Include("PersonAddress") .Include("PersonLandline") .Include("PersonMobile") .Include("PersonEmail") .Include("Contract") .Include("Contract.Program") where people.Contract.Any( contract => (param.OrganizationId == contract.OrganizationId) && contract.Program.Any( contractProgram => (param.ProgramId == contractProgram.ProgramId))) select people; The problem is that it filters the person to the criteria but not the Contracts or the Contract's Programs. It brings back all Contracts that each person has not just the ones that have an OrganizationId of x and the same goes for each of those Contract's Programs respectively. What I want is only the people that have at least one contract with an OrgId of x with and where that contract has a Program with the Id of y... and for the object graph that is returned to have only the contracts that match and programs within that contract that match. I kinda understand why its not working, but I don't know how to change it so it is working... This is my attempt thus far: from people in ctx.People.Include("PersonAddress") .Include("PersonLandline") .Include("PersonMobile") .Include("PersonEmail") .Include("Contract") .Include("Contract.Program") let currentContracts = from contract in people.Contract where (param.OrganizationId == contract.OrganizationId) select contract let currentContractPrograms = from contractProgram in currentContracts let temp = from x in contractProgram.Program where (param.ProgramId == contractProgram.ProgramId) select x where temp.Any() select temp where currentContracts.Any() && currentContractPrograms.Any() select new Person { PersonId = people.PersonId, FirstName = people.FirstName, ..., ...., MiddleName = people.MiddleName, Surname = people.Surname, ..., ...., Gender = people.Gender, DateOfBirth = people.DateOfBirth, ..., ...., Contract = currentContracts, ... }; //This doesn't work But this has several problems (where the Person type is an EF object): I am left to do the mapping by myself, which in this case there is quite a lot to map When ever I try to map a list to a property (i.e. Scholarship = currentScholarships) it says I can't because IEnumerable is trying to be cast to EntityCollection Include doesn't work Hence how do I get this to work. Keeping in mind that I am trying to do this as a compiled query so I think that means anonymous types are out.

    Read the article

  • LINQ + Find count of non-null values

    - by Ashutosh
    I have a table with the below structure. ID VALUE 1 3.2 2 NULL 4 NULL 5 NULL 7 NULL 10 1.8 11 NULL 12 3.2 15 4.7 17 NULL 22 NULL 24 NULL 25 NULL 27 NULL 28 7 I would like to get the max count of consecutive null values in the table. Any help would be greatly appreciated. THanks Ashutosh

    Read the article

  • Create LINQ to entities OrderBy expression on the fly

    - by AyKarsi
    I'm trying to add the orderby expression on the fly. But when the query below is executed I get the following exception: System.NotSupportedException: Unable to create a constant value of type 'Closure type'. Only primitive types ('such as Int32, String, and Guid') are supported in this context. The strange thing is, I am query exactly those primitive types only. string sortBy = HttpContext.Current.Request.QueryString["sidx"]; ParameterExpression prm = Expression.Parameter(typeof(buskerPosting), "posting"); Expression orderByProperty = Expression.Property(prm, sortBy); // get the paged records IQueryable<PostingListItemDto> query = (from posting in be.buskerPosting where posting.buskerAccount.cmsMember.nodeId == m.Id orderby orderByProperty //orderby posting.Created select new PostingListItemDto { Set = posting }).Skip<PostingListItemDto>((page - 1) * pageSize).Take<PostingListItemDto>(pageSize); Hope somebody can shed some light on this!

    Read the article

  • linq get all object in one-dimensional collection

    - by scrat789
    public class Class1 : List<Class2> { } public class Class2 : List<Class3> { } public class Class3 { string str; int i; } public class Program { Class1 c = new Class1(); //insert values.... List<Class3> all = ??; } How can i get a one-dimensional collection in my var "all" ? please note I can not modify Class1, class2 and class3...

    Read the article

  • Linq, should I join those two queries together?

    - by 5YrsLaterDBA
    I have a Logins table which records when user is login, logout or loginFailed and its timestamp. Now I want to get the list of loginFailed after last login and the loginFailed happened within 24 hrs. What I am doing now is get the last login timestamp first. then use second query to get the final list. do you think I should join those two queris together? why not? why yes? var lastLoginTime = (from inRecord in db.Logins where inRecord.Users.UserId == userId && inRecord.Action == "I" orderby inRecord.Timestamp descending select inRecord.Timestamp).Take(1); if (lastLoginTime.Count() == 1) { DateTime lastInTime = (DateTime)lastLoginTime.First(); DateTime since = DateTime.Now.AddHours(-24); String actionStr = "F"; var records = from record in db.Logins where record.Users.UserId == userId && record.Timestamp >= since && record.Action == actionStr && record.Timestamp > lastInTime orderby record.Timestamp select record; }

    Read the article

  • How to get comma-separated values in Linq?

    - by Mujtaba Hassan
    I have the query below: var users = (from a in dc.UserRoles join u in dc.Users on a.intUserId equals u.ID join r in dc.Roles on a.intRoleId equals r.ID where r.intClientId == clientID select new UserRoleDetail { ID = a.ID, intUserId = a.intUserId, intRoleId = a.intRoleId, Name =u.FullName, //Here I need comma separated values. intAssignedById = a.intAssignedById, RoleName = r.vchName, Function = u.vchFunction }); I require all the values of "Name =u.FullName" to be comma-separated in a single record group by intRoleId. I mean for every role I need all the usernames in a sigle record comma separated. Any suggestion?

    Read the article

  • How do I get values of Linq Expression

    - by Yucel
    Hi, I have a method that takes Expression type parameter, in my method i want to get values of this expression but cant find out hot to do that. private User GetUser(Expression<Func<User, bool>> query) { User user = Context.User.Where(query).FirstOrDefault(); return user; } I am calling this method with different parameters like GetUser(u => u.Username == username); GetUser(u=> u.Email == email); I want to change GetUser method to work with stored procedures but i need to find what is inside query parameter I want to check if query is u.Username == username I will call GetUserByUsername SP if query is u.Email == email I will call GetuserByEmail SP

    Read the article

  • Timeout in LINQ to SQL inserting millions of records

    - by Bas
    I'm inserting approximently 3 million records in a database using this solution. Eventually when the application has been inserting records for a while (my last run lasted around 4 hours), it gives a timeout with the following SqlException: "SqlExcepetion: Timeout expired. The timeoutperiod elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." What's the best way to handle this exception? Is there a way to prevent this from happening or should I catch the exception? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Sort List by occurrence of a word by LINQ C#

    - by Thomas
    i have stored data in list like List<SearchResult> list = new List<SearchResult>(); SearchResult sr = new SearchResult(); sr.Description = "sample description"; list.Add(sr); suppose my data is stored in description field like "JCB Excavator - ECU P/N: 728/35700" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Wie man BBA reman erreicht" "this test JCB" "Ersatz Airbags, Gurtstrammer und Auto Körper Teile" now i want to query the list with my search term like geo jcb if you look then the word geo has stored many times in the description field. so i want to sort my list in such way that the word in search term found maximum that data will come first. please help me to do so. thanks

    Read the article

  • Removing values from a returned linq query

    - by Diver D
    HI there I am hoping for some help with a query I have. I have this query var group = from r in CustomerItem group r by r.StoreItemID into g select new { StoreItemID = g.Key, ItemCount = g.Count(), ItemAmount = Customer.Sum(cr => cr.ItemAmount),RedeemedAmount = Customer.Sum(x => x.RedeemedAmount) }; I am returning my results to a list so I can bind it listbox. I have a property called EntryType which is an int. There are 2 available numbers 1 or 2 Lets say I had 3 items that my query is working with 2 of them had the EntryType = 1 and the 3rd had EntryType2. The first records had a ItemAmount of 55.00 and the 3rd had a ItemAmount of 50.00 How can I group using something simlar to above but minus the ItemAmount of 50.00 from the grouped amount to return 60.00? Any help would be great!!

    Read the article

  • C# Linq: Can you merge DataContexts?

    - by Andreas Grech
    Say I have one database, and this database has a set of tables that are general to all Clients and some tables that are specific to certain clients. Now what I have in mind is creating a primary DataContext that includes only the tables that are general to all the clients, and then create separate DataContexts that contain only the tables that are specific to the client. Is there a way to kind of "merge" DataContexts so that it becomes one context? So for Client A, I need one DataContext that includes both the general tables and also the tables for that specific client (retrieved from two different DataContexts) ? [Update] What I think I can do is, from the Partial Class of the DataContext instead of letting my DataContext inherit from DataContext I make it inherit from MyDataContext; that way, the tables from MyDataContext and the other DataContext will be available in one DataContext class. What do you think about this approach? Of course with something like this you can only merge two datacontexts at once though...

    Read the article

  • linq min question/bug

    - by jdelator
    Anyone care to guess what currentIndex is at the end of execution? int[] ints = new int[] { -1, 12, 26, 41, 52, -1, -1 }; int currentIndex = ints.Min(); It's 110. Does anyone know why?

    Read the article

  • LINQ to Entites: How should I handle System.InvalidOperationException when checking for existance of

    - by chris
    I have a many-to-one relationship that users can edit via checkboxes. PK of Foo is ID, and fid contains the id from the checkbox. I'm checking to see if an element exists with: Foo ent; try { ent = ctx.Foo.First(f => f.ID == fid); } catch (System.InvalidOperationException ioe) { ent = new Foo(); } It seems to me that I should be able to do this without throwing an exception. What would be the best way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Linq to xml, retreaving generic interface-based list

    - by Rita
    I have an xml document that looks like this <Elements> <Element> <DisplayName /> <Type /> </Element> </Elements> I have an interface, interface IElement { string DisplayName {get;} } and a couple of derived classes: public class AElement: IElement public class BElement: IElement What I want to do, is to write the most efficient query to iterate through the xml and create a list of IElement, containing AElement or BElement, based on the 'Type' property in the xml. So far I have this: IEnumerable<AElement> elements = from xmlElement in XElement.Load(path).Elements("Element") where xmlElement.Element("type").Value == "AElement" select new AElement(xmlElement.Element("DisplayName").Value); return elements.Cast<IElement>().ToList(); But this is only for AElement, is there a way to add BElement in the same query, and also make it generic IEnumerable? Or would I have to run this query once for each derived type?

    Read the article

  • nested join linq-to-sql queries

    - by ile
    var result = ( from contact in db.Contacts where contact.ContactID == id join referContactID in db.ContactRefferedBies on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID orderby contact.ContactID descending select new ContactReferredByView { ContactReferredByID = referContactID.ContactReferredByID, ContactReferredByName = referContactName.FirstName + " " + referContactName.LastName }).Single(); Problem is in this line: join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID where referContactID.ContactID is called from the above join line. How to nest these two joins? Thanks in advance! Ile

    Read the article

  • Keeping Linq to SQL alive when using ViewModels (ASP.NET MVC)

    - by Kohan
    I have recently started using custom ViewModels (For example, CustomerViewModel) public class CustomerViewModel { public IList<Customer> Customers{ get; set; } public int ProductId{ get; set; } public CustomerViewModel(IList<Customer> customers, int productId) { this.Customers= customers; this.ProductId= productId; } public CustomerViewModel() { } } ... and am now passing them to my view instead of the Entities themselves (for example, var Custs = repository.getAllCusts(id) ) as it seems good practice to do so. The problem i have encountered is that when using ViewModels; by the time it has got to the the view i have lost the ability to lazy load on customers. I do not believe this was the case before using them. Is it possible to retain the ability of Lazy Loading while still using ViewModels? Or do i have to eager load using this method? Thanks, Kohan.

    Read the article

  • How to issue SQL Server lock hints in WCF Entity Framework?

    - by TMN
    I'm just learning the WCF entity framework (and .net in general), and I'm running into a problem specifying lock hints in an embedded SQL query. I'm trying to specify a query that has lock hints in it (e.g., "SELECT * FROM xyz WITH(XLOCK, ROWLOCK)") and I keep getting errors from the runtime that the query syntax is not valid. The query works if I enter it directly into SQL Server. Is there some special syntax for lock hints when creating IQueryable result sets, or do I have to somehow mess with the transaction isolation level (probably not possible, as I need to specify different lock hints on a subquery within the main query).

    Read the article

  • Generic List .First not working LINQ

    - by Hurricanepkt
    var stuff = ctx.spReport(); var StuffAssembled = new List<ReportCLS>(); var val = new List<ReportCLS>(); foreach (var item in stuff) { StuffAssembled.Add(new ReportCLS(item)); } val.Add(StuffAssembled.First()); Keeps throwing System.Collections.Generic.List' does not contain a definition for 'First' and no extension method 'First' accepting a first argument of type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) what is going wrong ? moreover how do i fix it? Thanks

    Read the article

  • help! Linq query

    - by menon
    I am getting error msg on the word Records - Type or namespace could not be found. Please help debugging it, what is missing? if (ProjDDL1.SelectedItem.Value != "--") results = CustomSearch<Records>(results, s => s.Business == ProjDDL1.SelectedItem.Value); Method CustomSearch: private DataTable CustomSearch<TKEY>(DataTable dt, Func<Records, bool> selector) { DataTable results = (dt.AsEnumerable().Where(selector).CopyToDataTable()); return results; }

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to deny access to SQL Server from specific programs?

    - by Paul McLoughlin
    Currently one of our databases (SQL Server 2008) is accessed via a number of different mechanisms: .Net SqlClient Data Provider; SQL Server Management Studio; various .Net applications and 2007 Microsoft Office system (basically Excel). I see that in the sys.dm_exec_sessions DMV it is possible to see the program name of the program accessing the database for the current sessions. My question is: is it possible for one to deny access from a particular named program? First prize would be if this could be done for any named program, but we would gain a great deal of benefit from being able to deny access to this specific database from all Microsoft Office applications (especially Excel).

    Read the article

  • Databinding expression for retrieving value of related collection using LINQ

    - by joshb
    I have a GridView that is bound to a LINQDataSource control that is returning a collection of customers. Within my DataGrid I need to display the home phone number of a customer, if they have one. The phone numbers of a customer are stored in a separate table with a foreign key pointing to the customer table. The following binding expression gets me the first phone number for a customer: <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="LastName" SortExpression="LastName"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="PhoneLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("Phones[0].PhoneNumber") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> I need to figure out how to get the home phone number specifically (filter based on phone type) and handle the scenario where the customer does not have a home phone in the database. Right now it's throwing an out of range exception if the customer does not have any phone numbers. I've tried using the Where operator with a lambda expression to filter the phone type but it doesn't work: <%# Eval("Phones.Where(p => p.PhoneTypeId == 2).PhoneNumber") %> Solutions or links to any good articles on the subject would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Need help with a Linq XML conditional grouping query

    - by FiveTools
    I have the following xml fragment: <BANNER ID="Banner 2" ROW_WIDTH="200"> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="BANNER_TEXTS"> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px"></BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Years In Practice</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Internet Usage</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="4" WIDTHT="312px">Sales Reps Seen / Week</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Prescription Volume</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="222px">Patient Load</BANNER_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="COLUMN_TEXTS"> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Total</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#60; 11 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">11-20 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">21-30 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Light 1-5 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Medium 6-10 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Heavy &#62;10 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">0</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">1-2</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">3-5</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#62;5</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">1-100</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">101-150</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#62;150</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">1-100</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">101-200</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">&#62;200</BANNER_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="COLUMN_TEXTS"> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(A)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(B)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(C)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(D)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(E)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(F)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(G)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(H)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(I)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(J)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(K)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(L)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(M)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(N)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(O)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(P)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(Q)</COLUMN_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> </BANNER> I would like to group all the 'BANNER_TEXT' in the second sequence using the first sequence 'BANNER_TEXT' as the key (only include elements where string is not null or empty). The span_col attribute in the first 'BANNER_TEXT' sequence indicates which elements by position in the 2nd sequence are related. An example: 'Years in Practice' would be the first key and the attribute SPAN_COL=3 for that element indicates it would contain '< 11 years', '11-20 years', '21-30 years' (the first grouping of string.empty = Total would be skipped).

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231  | Next Page >