Search Results

Search found 35561 results on 1423 pages for 'value'.

Page 225/1423 | < Previous Page | 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232  | Next Page >

  • How can I get a default value in some instances but not others?

    - by Connor Wagner
    I am making an iPhone app and want to use an 'if' statement and a boolean to set default values in some instances but not others... is this possible? Are there alternative options if it is not possible? In the MainViewController.m I have: @interface MainViewController (){ BOOL moveOver; } [...] - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; _label.text = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%i", computerSpeed]; } } [...] - (void)flipsideViewControllerDidFinish:(FlipsideViewController *)controller { [self dismissViewControllerAnimated:YES completion:nil]; moveOver = true; } The problem that it is redefined when the ViewDidLoad runs... I need a statement that will not redefine when the ViewDidLoad runs. I have something that I feel like is much closer to working... In the ViewDidLoad I have: if (playToInt != 10 || computerMoveSpeed != 3) { moveOver = TRUE; } which connects to my created method, gameLoop. It has if (moveOver == false) { computerMoveSpeed = 3; playToInt = 10; } I have tried putting the code in the gameLoop into the ViewDidLoad, but it had the same effect. When moveOver was false, the computerMoveSpeed and the playToInt were both seemingly 0. I have two UITextFields and typed 10 and 3 in them... does this not set it to the default? It seems to set the default to 0 for both, how do I change this? THIS IS A DIFFERENT ISSUE THAN THE THREE BOOLEAN VALUES QUESTION

    Read the article

  • byte and short data types in Java can accept the value outside the range by explicit cast. The higher data types however can not. Why?

    - by Lion
    Let's consider the following expressions in Java. byte a = 32; byte b = (byte) 250; int i = a + b; This is valid in Java even though the expression byte b = (byte) 250; is forced to assign the value 250 to b which is outside the range of the type byte. Therefore, b is assigned -6 and consequently i is assigned the value 26 through the statement int i = a + b;. The same thing is possible with short as follows. short s1=(short) 567889999; Although the specified value is outside the range of short, this statement is legal. The same thing is however wrong with higher data types such int, double, folat etc and hence, the following case is invalid and causes a compile-time error. int z=2147483648; This is illegal, since the range of int in Java is from -2,147,483,648 to 2147483647 which the above statement exceeds and issues a compile-time error. Why is such not wrong with byte and short data types in Java?

    Read the article

  • How to code the set method of a Map with another Map as value?

    - by Nazgulled
    I normally do this to set a new Map to a private variable: public static void setListaClausulas(Map<String, Clausula> nvLista) { listaClausulas = new TreeMap<String, Clausula>(nvLista); } I suppose this is ok to set a new copy of the nvLista and all it's members and not a reference, is it? But now I have a Map inside another Map and I'm doing this: public static void setListaClausulas(Map<String, Map<String, Clausula>> nvLista) { listaClausulas = new TreeMap<String, Map<String, Clausula>>(nvLista); } Is this the correct way to do it or do you recommend something else? What I want is to set a new copy of nvLista (and all it's elements) and not copy just the reference.

    Read the article

  • How can I check if a value is in a list in Perl?

    - by ablimit
    I have a file in which every line is an integer which represents an id. What I want to do is just check whether some specific ids are in this list. But the code didn't work. It never tells me it exists even if 123 is a line in that file. I don't know why? Help appreciated. open (FILE, "list.txt") or die ("unable to open !"); my @data=<FILE>; my %lookup =map {chop($_) => undef} @data; my $element= '123'; if (exists $lookup{$element}) { print "Exists"; } Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • C++ Static Array Initialization - Memory Issue

    - by donalmg
    Hi, I have a header file which contains a member variable declaration of a static char array: class ABC { public: static char newArray[4]; // other variables / functions private: void setArray(int i, char * ptr); } In the CPP file, I have the array initialized to NULL: char ABC::newArray[4] = {0}; In the ABC constructor, I need to overwrite this value with a value constructed at runtime, such as the encoding of an integer: ABC::ABC() { int i; //some int value defined at runtime memset(newArray, 0, 4); // not sure if this is necessary setArray(i,newArray); } ... void setArray(int i, char * value) { // encoding i to set value[0] ... value [3] } When I return from this function, and print the modified newArray value, it prints out many more characters than the 4 specified in the array declaration. Any ideas why this is the case. I just want to set the char array to 4 characters and nothing further. Thanks...

    Read the article

  • MySQL UPDATE WHERE IN for each listed value separately?

    - by Tom
    Hi, I've got the following type of SQL: UPDATE photo AS f LEFT JOIN car AS c ON f.car_id=c.car_id SET f.photo_status=1 , c.photo_count=c.photo_count+1 WHERE f.photo_id IN ($ids) Basically, two tables (car & photo) are related. The list in $ids contains unique photo ids, such as (34, 87, 98, 12). With the query, I'm setting the status of each photo in that list to "1" in the photo table and simultaneously incrementing the photo count in the car table for the car at hand. It works but there's one snag: Because the list can contain multiple photo ids that relate to the same car, the photo count only ever gets incremented once. If the list had 10 photos associated with the same car, photo_count would become 1 .... whereas I'd like to increment it to 10. Is there a way to make the incrementation occur for each photo individually through the join, as opposed to MySQL overthinking it for me? I hope the above makes sense. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • PHP - javascript validation radio button

    - by user1806136
    i have a form with 3 sets of radio buttons. i want to set a simple javascript validation alert to appear when user clicks on submit when one of the fields is null. how can i do that using javascript ? my code so far is .. <?php session_start(); $Load=$_SESSION['login_user']; include('../connect.php'); if (isset($_POST['submit'])) { $v1 = intval($_POST['v1']); $v2 = intval($_POST['v2']); $v3 = intval($_POST['v3']); $total = $v1 + $v2 + $v3 ; mysql_query("INSERT into Form1 (P1,P2,P3,TOTAL) values('$v1','$v2','$v3','$total')") or die(mysql_error()); header("Location: mark.php"); } <center><form method="post" action="mark.php" > <tr> <th > School Evaluation <font size="4" > </font></th> <tr> <th > Criteria <font size="4" > </font></th> <th> 4<font size="4" > </font></th> <th> 3<font size="4" > </font></th> <th> 2<font size="4" > </font></th> <th> 1<font size="4" > </font></th> </tr> <tr> <th> Your attendance<font size="4" > </font></th> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v1" value = "4" onclick="updateTotal();"/></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v1" value = "3" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v1" value = "2" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v1" value = "1" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> </tr> <tr> <th > Your grades <font size="4" > </font></th> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v2" value = "4" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v2" value = "3" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v2" value = "2" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v2" value = "1" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> </tr> <tr> <th >Your self-control <font size="4" > </font></th> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v3" value = "4" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v3" value = "3" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v3" value = "2" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> <td> <input type="radio" name ="v3" value = "1" onclick="updateTotal();" /></td> </tr> </tr> </table> i have put <br> <td><input type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" onClick="return validation(form);"> <input type="reset" name="clear" value="clear" style="width: 70px"></td> </form> i have try alot of codes but no alert appears!

    Read the article

  • SQL grouping query question; evaluating a group of rows based on the value of one field.

    - by user324575
    I've got table vendorparts that lists all my parts and their vendor(s). Parts with multiple vendors have multiple records in this table. I'm trying to write a query that only returns the partid, and vendor of parts that do not have a default vendor assigned. Partid Vendor Defaultflag 1 A 1 2 B 0 2 C 0 3 D 0 3 E 0 3 F 1 4 G 0 I would like to return the following: Partid Vendor 2 A 2 B 4 G I'm obviously having issues with partid 3 and getting the query to see it as having a default vendor assigned.

    Read the article

  • How do you keep the value of global variables (namely a struct variable) between postbacks?

    - by user3702304
    I'm new to this and have already searched for this with not much luck :( Lets say I have defined a struct array globally and filled the array with data on an Ajax ModalPopupExtender. I then have a ddl_SelectedIndexChanged event that does a postback and seems to recycle my array. Is there a way to fire the ddl_SelectedIndexChanged event to perform some code without doing a postback? Or is there an easy way to make the array of type struct retain it's values? (I am creating a website btw) Thanks in advance...

    Read the article

  • which sql query is more efficient: select count(*) or select ... where key>value?

    - by davka
    I need to periodically update a local cache with new additions to some DB table. The table rows contain an auto-increment sequential number (SN) field. The cache keeps this number too, so basically I just need to fetch all rows with SN larger than the highest I already have. SELECT * FROM table where SN > <max_cached_SN> However, the majority of the attempts will bring no data (I just need to make sure that I have an absolutely up-to-date local copy). So I wander if this will be more efficient: count = SELECT count(*) from table; if (count > <cache_size>) // fetch new rows as above I suppose that selecting by an indexed numeric field is quite efficient, so I wander whether using count has benefit. On the other hand, this test/update will be done quite frequently and by many clients, so there is a motivation to optimize it.

    Read the article

  • How do I compare 2 fields and return the lowest value of each record?

    - by BigRob
    I'm slowly learning access to make a database of products and suppliers for my parents' business. What i've got is a table of products indexed by our product reference and 2 more tables for 2 different suppliers that contains the suppliers product reference and price that links with our reference. I've made a query that performs a left outer join such that it returns a table of our products with each supplier's reference and price, i.e: Ref | Product Name | Supplier 1 Ref | Supplier 1 Price | Supplier 2 Ref | Supplier 2 Price Here's the query I used: SELECT Catalog.Ref, Catalog.[Product Name], Catalog.Price, [D Products].[Supplier Ref], [D Products].Cost, [GS Products].[Supplier Ref], [GS Products].Cost FROM ([Catalog] LEFT JOIN [D Products] ON Catalog.Ref = [D Products].Ref) LEFT JOIN [GS Products] ON Catalog.Ref = [GS Products].Ref; Not all products are available from both suppliers, hence the outer join. What I want to do (with a query?) is to take the table produced by the query above and simply show the product reference, cheapest supplier reference and cheapest supplier price, i.e: Ref | Cheapest Suppplier Ref | Cheapest Supplier Price Unfortunately my SQL knowledge isn't quite good enough to figure this out, but if anyone can help i'd really appreciate it. Thanks, Rob

    Read the article

  • NSPredicate (Core Data fetch) to filter on an attribute value being present in a supplied set (list)

    - by starbaseweb
    I'm trying to create a fetch predicate that is the analog to the SQL "IN" statement, and the syntax to do so with NSPredicate escapes me. Here's what I have so far (the relevant excerpt from my fetching routine): NSFetchRequest *request = [[[NSFetchRequest alloc] init] autorelease]; NSEntityDescription *entity = [NSEntityDescription entityForName: @"BodyPartCategory" inManagedObjectContext:_context]; [request setEntity:entity]; NSPredicate *predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"(name IN %@)", [RPBodyPartCategory defaultBodyPartCategoryNames]]; [request setPredicate:predicate]; The entity "BodyPartCategory" has a string attribute "name". I have a list of names (just NSString objects) in an NSArray as returned by: [RPBodyPartCategory defaultBodyPartCategoryNames] So let's say that array has string such as {@"Liver", @"Kidney", @"Thyroid"} ... etc. I want to fetch all 'BodyPartCategory' instances whose name attribute matches one of the strings in the set provided (technically NSArray but I can make it an NSSet). In SQL, this would be something like: SELECT * FROM BodyPartCategories WHERE name IN ('Liver', 'Kidney', 'Thyroid') I've gone through various portions of the Predicate Programming Guide, but I don't see this simple use case covered. Pointers/help much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Select All options and Disable not working in IE

    - by user1096909
    I'm having an issue in IE8 multiselect we are using jQuery to selectall and disable the list. List is being disabled but not selected and the same scenario is working perfectly in FireFox where the entire list is selected and disable Can anyone help me how to handle this issue in IE Thanks in advance Below is my code: <select name="weekdays" id="weekdays" disabled="disabled" multiple> <option value="Monday">Monday </option> <option value="Tuesday">Tuesday</option> <option value="Wednesday">Wednesday</option> <option value="Thursday">Thursday </option> <option value="Friday">Friday</option> <option value="Saturday">Saturday</option> <option value="Sunday">Sunday</option> </select>

    Read the article

  • How do I "valueOf" an enum given a class name?

    - by stevemac
    Lets say I have a simple Enum called Animal defined as: public enum Animal { CAT, DOG } and I have a method like: private static Object valueOf(String value, Class<?> classType) { if (classType == String.class) { return value; } if (classType == Integer.class) { return Integer.parseInt(value); } if (classType == Long.class) { return Long.parseLong(value); } if (classType == Boolean.class) { return Boolean.parseBoolean(value); } // Enum resolution here } What can I put inside this method to return an instance of my enum where the value is of the classType? I have looked at trying: if (classType == Enum.class) { return Enum.valueOf((Class<Enum>)classType, value); } But that doesn't work.

    Read the article

  • the variable only have it value inside while loop?

    - by user1834467
    static void parse(String fileName) throws IOException{ FileReader fileReader=new FileReader((fileName)); BufferedReader bufferedReader = new BufferedReader(fileReader); StringBuilder stringBuilder=new StringBuilder(); String string; StringBuilder myString = null; while((string = bufferedReader.readLine()) != null) { myString =stringBuilder.append(string); String h=myString.toString(); **System.out.println(h);** } } static void parse(String fileName) throws IOException{ FileReader fileReader=new FileReader((fileName)); BufferedReader bufferedReader = new BufferedReader(fileReader); StringBuilder stringBuilder=new StringBuilder(); String string; StringBuilder myString = null; while((string = bufferedReader.readLine()) != null) { myString =stringBuilder.append(string); String h=myString.toString(); } **System.out.println(h);** } when I try the second part of the code, it print out nothing. how can I get the whole h String outside of the while loop? Is it I have to declare the variable h as instance variable instead of local variable?

    Read the article

  • How to make a SUM of Dictionary Value nested into a list with LINQ ?

    - by user551108
    Hi All, I have a product object declared as : Product { int ProductID; string ProductName; int ProductTypeID; string ProductTypeName; int UnitsSold Dictionary <string, int> UnitsSoldByYear; } I want to make a sum on UnitsSold and UnitsSoldByYear properties with a Linq query but I didn't know how to make this kind of sum on a dictionary ! Here is my begining linq query code : var ProductTypeSum = from i in ProductsList group i by new { i.ProductTypeID, i.ProductTypeName} into pt select new { ProductTypeID= pt.Key.ProductTypeID, ProductTypeName= pt.Key.ProductTypeName, UnitsSoldSum= pt.Sum(i => i.UnitsSold), // How to make a Dictionary sum here } Thank you for your help !

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232  | Next Page >