Search Results

Search found 27047 results on 1082 pages for 'multiple projects'.

Page 226/1082 | < Previous Page | 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233  | Next Page >

• Mapping multiple keys to the same value in a Javascript hash

  - by Bears will eat you

  I use a Javascript hash object to store a set of numerical counters, set up like this [this is greatly simplified]: var myHash = { A: 0, B: 0, C: 0 }; Is there a way to make other keys, ones not explicitly in myHash, map to keys that are? For instance, I'd like [again, this is simplified]: myHash['A_prime']++; // or myHash.A_prime++; to be exactly equivalent to myHash['A']++; // or myHash.A++; e.g. incrementing the value found at the key A, not A_prime.

  Read the article

• Combining multiple classes gives me errors

  - by Martti Laine

  Hello I'm creating a website with structure like this: class main { } class mysql extends main { } class user extends main { } class etc extends main { } The idea is for these classes to use functions from each other. This doesn't work. How can I call a function from mysql in user? Martti Laine

  Read the article

• Assign Multiple Custom User Roles to a Custom Post Type

  - by OUHSD Webmaster

  Okay here's the situation.... I'm working on a my business website. There will be a work/portfolio area. "Work" is a custom post type. "Designer" is a custom user role. "Client" is a custom user role. In creating a new "Work" post I would like to be able to select both a "designer" and "Client" to assign to the piece of work, as I would assign an author to a regular ol' post. I tried the method from this answer but it did not work for me. ) I placed it in my functions.php file. ` add_filter('wp_dropdown_users', 'test'); function test($output) { global $post; //Doing it only for the custom post type if($post->post_type == 'work') { $users = get_users(array('role'=>'designer')); //We're forming a new select with our values, you can add an option //with value 1, and text as 'admin' if you want the admin to be listed as well, //optionally you can use a simple string replace trick to insert your options, //if you don't want to override the defaults $output .= "<select id='post_author_override' name='post_author_override' class=''>"; foreach($users as $user) { $output .= "<option value='".$user->id."'>".$user->user_login."</option>"; } $output .= "</select>"; } return $output; } ` Any help would be extremely appreciated!

  Read the article

• Observer Design Pattern - multiple event types

  - by David

  I'm currently implementing the Observer design pattern and using it to handle adding items to the session, create error logs and write messages out to the user giving feedback on their actions (e.g. You've just logged out!). I began with a single method on the subject called addEvent() but as I added more Observers I found that the parameters required to detail all the information I needed for each listener began to grow. I now have 3 methods called addMessage(), addStorage() and addLog(). These add data into an events array that has a key related to the event type (e.g. log, message, storage) but I'm starting to feel that now the subject needs to know too much about the listeners that are attached. My alternative thought is to go back to addEvent() and pass an event type (e.g. USER_LOGOUT) along with the data associated and each Observer maintains it's own list of event handles it is looking for (possibly in a switch statement), but this feels cumbersome. Also, I'd need to check that sufficient data had also been passed along with the event type. What is the correct way of doing this? Please let me know if I can explain any parts of this further. I hope you can help and see the problem I'm battling with.

  Read the article

• Authenticating to multiple OUs in Active Directory

  - by Jaxidian

  I'm using the Active Directory Membership Provider with the following configuration: <connectionStrings> <add name="MyConnString" connectionString="LDAP://domaincontroller/OU=Product Users,DC=my,DC=domain,DC=com" /> </connectionStrings> <membership defaultProvider="MyProvider"> <providers> <clear /> <add name="MyProvider" connectionStringName="MyConnString" connectionUsername="my.domain.com\service_account" connectionPassword="biguglypassword" type="System.Web.Security.ActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" /> </providers> </membership> This works perfectly except it requires ALL of my users to be in the "Product Users" OU when I would actually like to have all of my users organized into various child OUs under our "Product Users" OU. Is this possible? (Note that this is a partial repost of this question but the question I'm asking here was never answered there.)

  Read the article

• Multiple SessionFactories in Windows Service with NHibernate

  - by Rob Taylor

  Hi all, I have a Webapp which connects to 2 DBs (one core, the other is a logging DB). I must now create a Windows service which will use the same business logic/Data access DLLs. However when I try to reference 2 session factories in the Service App and call the factory.GetCurrentSession() method, I get the error message "No session bound to current context". Does anyone have a suggestion about how this can be done? public class StaticSessionManager { public static readonly ISessionFactory SessionFactory; public static readonly ISessionFactory LoggingSessionFactory; static StaticSessionManager() { string fileName = System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["DefaultNHihbernateConfigFile"]; string executingPath = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(System.Reflection.Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().CodeBase); fileName = executingPath + "\\" + fileName; SessionFactory = cfg.Configure(fileName).BuildSessionFactory(); cfg = new Configuration(); fileName = System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["LoggingNHihbernateConfigFile"]; fileName = executingPath + "\\" + fileName; LoggingSessionFactory = cfg.Configure(fileName).BuildSessionFactory(); } } The configuration file has the setting: <property name="current_session_context_class">call</property> The service sets up the factories: private ISession _session = null; private ISession _loggingSession = null; private ISessionFactory _sessionFactory = StaticSessionManager.SessionFactory; private ISessionFactory _loggingSessionFactory = StaticSessionManager.LoggingSessionFactory; ... _sessionFactory = StaticSessionManager.SessionFactory; _loggingSessionFactory = StaticSessionManager.LoggingSessionFactory; _session = _sessionFactory.OpenSession(); NHibernate.Context.CurrentSessionContext.Bind(_session); _loggingSession = _loggingSessionFactory.OpenSession(); NHibernate.Context.CurrentSessionContext.Bind(_loggingSession); So finally, I try to call the correct factory by: ISession session = StaticSessionManager.SessionFactory.GetCurrentSession(); Can anyone suggest a better way to handle this? Thanks in advance! Rob

  Read the article

• How do I do multiple assignment in MATLAB?

  - by Benjamin Oakes

  Here's an example of what I'm looking for: >> foo = [88, 12]; >> [x, y] = foo; I'd expect something like this afterwards: >> x x = 88 >> y y = 12 But instead I get errors like: ??? Too many output arguments. I thought deal() might do it, but it seems to only work on cells. >> [x, y] = deal(foo{:}); ??? Cell contents reference from a non-cell array object. How do I solve my problem? Must I constantly index by 1 and 2 if I want to deal with them separately?

  Read the article

• How to make multiple wires quickly in Verilog?

  - by user1334858

  I am trying to make 24 wires in total very quickly but I keep getting the error: Error (10170): Verilog HDL syntax error at your_ALU_mux.v(81) near text "="; expecting ".", or an identifier Here is my code: module your_ALU_mux(your_out, operandA, operandB, opcode, switches, address); input [7:0] operandA, operandB, address; input [3:0] opcode, switches; output [7:0] your_out; wire [0:7] Bnot, newb, newa; wire Cin, Cout; not (Bnot[0], operandB[0]), (Bnot[1], operandB[1]), (Bnot[2], operandB[2]), (Bnot[3], operandB[3]), (Bnot[4], operandB[4]), (Bnot[5], operandB[5]), (Bnot[6], operandB[6]), (Bnot[7], operandB[7]); // Getting A' and B' if (address == 16'h00 || address == 16'h01) // Add A + B if (address == 16'h00) // newa = A newa[0] = operandA[0]; newa[1] = operandA[1]; newa[2] = operandA[2]; newa[3] = operandA[3]; newa[4] = operandA[4]; newa[5] = operandA[5]; newa[6] = operandA[6]; newa[7] = operandA[7]; // newb = B' newb[0] = Bnot[0]; newb[1] = Bnot[1]; newb[2] = Bnot[2]; newb[3] = Bnot[3]; newb[4] = Bnot[4]; newb[5] = Bnot[5]; newb[6] = Bnot[6]; newb[7] = Bnot[7]; // Carry in = 1 Cin = 1; // A-B else if (address == 16'h01) // newb = B newb[0] = operandB[0]; newb[1] = operandB[1]; newb[2] = operandB[2]; newb[3] = operandB[3]; newb[4] = operandB[4]; newb[5] = operandB[5]; newb[6] = operandB[6]; newb[7] = operandB[7]; // newa = A newa[0] = operandA[0]; newa[1] = operandA[1]; newa[2] = operandA[2]; newa[3] = operandA[3]; newa[4] = operandA[4]; newa[5] = operandA[5]; newa[6] = operandA[6]; newa[7] = operandA[7]; // Carry in = 0 Cin = 0; end RippleCarryAdd A+B(.S0(your_out[0]), .S1(your_out[1],.S2(your_out[2],.S3(your_out[3],.S4(your_out[4],.S5(your_out[5] S6.(your_out[6]), S7.(your_out[7], .Cout(Cout),.Cin(Cin), .A0(newa[0]),.A1(newa[1]),.A2(newa[2]),.A3(newa[3]),.A4(newa[4]),.A5(newa[5]), .A6(newa[6]),.A7(newa[7]), .B0(newb[0]),.B1(newb[1]),.B2(newb[2]),.B3(newb[3]),.B4(newb[4]), .B5(newb[5]),.B6(newb[6]),.B7(newb[7])); endmodule I also get in error saying: Error (10170): Verilog HDL syntax error at your_ALU_mux.v(66) near text "if"; expecting "endmodule" And the it brings me to my first if statement. Is this the wrong way of going about creating wires and them using them?

  Read the article

• Laravel 4 - Using multiple paginators on one page

  - by Fry Farnsworth

  I've been googling for this question but can't find any good answers. I found that there is a method called setPageName() for the paginator but it only works when used like Paginator::setPageName('page'). I looked up the paginator in the Laravel API (http://laravel.com/api/class-Illuminate.Pagination.Environment.html) and the method is a public function just like setBaseUrl which I am currently using like $albums->setBaseUrl('/album/'); for instance I want to have a Photo paginator (?photoPage=n) and a Comment paginator (?commentPage=n). Is there any way that I can use two paginators that use different page names in the URL on one page, or at least call the setPageName() method like setBaseUrl()?

  Read the article

• javascript multiple input textbox validation

  - by murugesan

  I have 'n' number of textbox on a form, after the user enters a value in a textbox, i need to validate its not a duplicate in the other textboxes. Ex : Textbox[0] : 1 Textbox[1] : 2 Textbox[2] : 3 Textbox[4] : 1 For this example it should alert saying that '1' have entered twice. Let me know what to be done.

  Read the article

• JNI: Passing multiple parameters in the function signature for GetMethodID

  - by Jary

  I am trying to execute a function in Java (from C) that has the following signature: public void execute(int x, int y, int action); My problem is to define the function signature in GetMethodID: env->GetMethodID(hostClass, "execute", "(I;I;I;)V"); The problem I ma getting is: W/dalvikvm( 1849): Bogus method descriptor: (I;I;I;)V W/dalvikvm( 1849): Bogus method descriptor: (I;I;I;)V D/dalvikvm( 1849): GetMethodID: method not found: Lcom/device/client/HostConnection;.execute:(I;I;I;)V I am not sure how to specify the method signature in GetMethodID (for 3 integers as parameters). I saw people use the ";" to separate parameters in other posts for the String and File class, but nothing with primitives like integer. What would be the correct way to do this please? Thank you.

  Read the article

• Multiple remote_form_for on the same page causes duplicate ids

  - by Ben Scheirman

  I've got a rails app that displays a list of items called modules. I'm iterating over these, rendering a partial for each one that includes a remote_form_for call. This all works, but fails HTML validation because my form text fields all have the same id. Is there a :prefix option on the form (or something else) I can use to get around this? Update: (some code) //_module_form.html.erb <% remote_form_for app_module do |f| %> <%= f.label :name %> <%= f.text_field :name %> <%= submit_tag 'Save' %> <%end %> //parent page <% @thing.modules.each do |app_module| %> <%= render :partial => "module_form", :locals => { :app_module => app_module } %> <% end %> So if I have more than 1 item in the collection, I render the identical form on the same page, and the form id and textbox id are duplicated. I can customize the form id pretty easily, but what about the text_box, since the controller is looking for specific named controls?

  Read the article

• JSF actionListener is called multiple times from within HtmlTable

  - by Rose

  I have a mix of columns in my htmltable: 1 column is an actionlistener, 2 columns are actions and other columns are simple output. <h:dataTable styleClass="table" id="orderTable" value="#{table.dataModel}" var="anOrder" binding="#{table.dataTable}" rows="#{table.rows}" <an:listenerColumn backingBean="${orderEntry}" entity="${anOrder}" actionListener="closeOrder"/ <an:column label="#{msg.hdr_orderStatus}" entity="#{anOrder}" propertyName="orderStatus" / <an:actionColumn backingBean="${orderEntry}" entity="${anOrder}" action="editOrder" / <an:actionColumn backingBean="${orderEntry}" entity="${anOrder}" action="viewOrder"/ .... I'm using custom tags, but it's the same behavior if I use the default column tags. I've noticed a very strange effect: when clicking the actionlistenercolumn, the actionevent is handled 3 times. If I remove the 2 action columns then the actionevent is handled only once. The managed bean has sessionscope, bean method: public void closeOrder(ActionEvent event) { OrdersDto order; if ((order = orderRow()) == null) { return; } System.out.println("closeOrder() 1 "); orderManager.closeOrder(); System.out.println("closeOrder() 2 "); } the console prints the'debug' text 3 times.

  Read the article

• One DataGrid Item Renderer for multiple columns

  - by user329650

  Hey, I'm trying to create a Flex DataGrid where the firstname and lastname are shown under each other, but in the DataGridColumn Ideally I would want to do something like <mx:columns> <mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Column 2" dataField="time"/> <mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Column 2" dataField="firstname,lastname" itemRenderer="renderers.FirstNameLastName"/> so that both values get passed to the itemrenderer, is this possible? Dennis

  Read the article

• trac with multiple svn repos?

  - by ajsie

  is there a way to configure trac to use more than one svn repo in trac.ini?

  Read the article

• rails multiple outer joins syntax

  - by Craig McGuff

  I have the following models user has_many :leave_balances leave_balance belongs_to :user belongs_to :leave_type leave_type has_many :leave_balances I want to output a table format showing user names and their balance by leave type. Not every user can have every balance i.e. outer joins required. I'd like to see something like this: Employee Annual Leave Sick Leave Bob 10 Fred 9 Sara 12 15 I am unsure how to get this out as a single statement? I am thinking something like User.joins(:leave_balances).joins(:leave_type)

  Read the article

• How to play multiple online videos on IOS continuously

  - by Matt.Z

  The scenario is like this: I have some long video, and slice it into small files(mp4, for example: 5 min per file), put them under some website. I wanna play (on IOS) these mp4 videos continuously, one by one, try to do not let user feel there has a pause between video pieces. So I need to buffer next video when I play current one. But I don't know where to start. What should I do? Can anyone give me some information of related documentation or source code I can study with?

  Read the article

• Excel, VBA Vlookup, multiple returns into rows

  - by Sean Mc

  Very new to VBA, so please excuse my ignorance. How would you alter the code below to return the result into rows as opposed to a string? Thanks in advance.... data Acct No CropType ------- --------- 0001 Grain 0001 OilSeed 0001 Hay 0002 Grain function =vlookupall("0001", A:A, 1, " ") Here is the code: Function VLookupAll(ByVal lookup_value As String, _ ByVal lookup_column As range, _ ByVal return_value_column As Long, _ Optional seperator As String = ", ") As String Application.ScreenUpdating = False Dim i As Long Dim result As String For i = 1 To lookup_column.Rows.count If Len(lookup_column(i, 1).text) <> 0 Then If lookup_column(i, 1).text = lookup_value Then result = result & (lookup_column(i).offset(0, return_value_column).text & seperator) End If End If Next If Len(result) <> 0 Then result = Left(result, Len(result) - Len(seperator)) End If VLookupAll = result Application.ScreenUpdating = True End FunctionNotes:

  Read the article

• how can multiple trailing slashes can be removed from an url in Ruby

  - by splintercell

  Hello, What i'm trying to achieve here is lets say we have two example urls: url1 "http://emy.dod.com/kaskaa/dkaiad/amaa//////////" & url2 = "http://www.example.com/". How can I extract the striped down urls? url1 : "http://emy.dod.com/kaskaa/dkaiad/amaa" & url2 to "http://http://www.example.com"? URI.parse in ruby sanitizes certain type of malformed url but is ineffective in this case. If we use regex then /^(.*)\/$/ removes a single slash (/) from url1 & is ineffective for url2. Is anybody aware of how to handle this type of url parsing? The point here is I dont want my system to have "http://www.example.com/" & "http://www.example.com" being treated as two different urls. And same goes for "http://emy.dod.com/kaskaa/dkaiad/amaa////" & "http://emy.dod.com/kaskaa/dkaiad/amaa/" cheers, -dg

  Read the article

• SQL 2005 Merge / concatenate multiple rows to one column

  - by Dave

  Hi, We have a bit of a SQL quandry. Say I have a results that look like this... 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | A 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | B 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | C 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | D 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | E 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | F is there a way I can group these results within SQL to return as 61E77D90-D53D-4E2E-A09E-9D6F012EB59C | A B C D 7ce953ca-a55b-4c55-a52c-9d6f012ea903 | E F Any ideas people? Many thanks Dave

  Read the article

• Fact table with multiple facts

  - by Jeff Meatball Yang

  I have a dimension (SiteItem) has two important facts: perUserClicks perBrowserClicks however, within this dimension, I have groups of dimensions based on an attribute column (let's call the groups AboveFoldItems, LeftNavItems, OnTheFlyItems, etc.) each have more facts that are specific to that group: AboveFoldItems: eyeTime, loadTime LeftNavItems: mouseOverTime OnTheFlyItems: doesn't have any extra, but may in the future Is the following fact table schema ok? DateKey SessionKey SiteItemKey perUserClicks perBrowserClicks eyeTime loadTime mouseOverTime It seems a little wasteful since only some columns pertain to some dimension keys (the irrelevant facts are left NULL). But... this seems like it would be a common problem, so there should be a common solution for this, right?

  Read the article

• Render multiple Form instances

  - by vorpyg

  I have a simple application where users are supposed to bet on outcome of a match. A match consists of two teams, a result and a stake. Matches with teams are created in the Django admin, and participants are to fill in result and stake. The form must be generated dynamically, based on the matches in the database. My idea is to have one (Django) Form instance for each match and pass these instances to the template. It works fine when I do it from django shell, but the instances aren't rendered when I load my view. The form looks like this: class SuggestionForm(forms.Form): def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): try: match = kwargs.pop('match') except KeyError: pass super(SuggestionForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) label = match self.fields['result'] = forms.ChoiceField(label=label, required=True, choices=CHOICES, widget=forms.RadioSelect()) self.fields['stake'] = forms.IntegerField(label='', required=True, max_value=50, min_value=10, initial=10) My (preliminary) view looks like this: def suggestion_form(request): matches = Match.objects.all() form_collection = {} for match in matches: f = SuggestionForm(request.POST or None, match=match) form_collection['match_%s' % match.id] = f return render_to_response('app/suggestion_form.html', { 'forms': form_collection, }, context_instance = RequestContext(request) ) My initial thought was that I could pass the form_collection to the template and the loop throught the collection like this, but id does not work: {% for form in forms %} {% for field in form %} {{ field }} {% endfor %} {% endfor %} (The output is actually the dict keys with added spaces in between each letter - I've no idea why…) It works if I only pass one Form instance to the template and only runs the inner loop. Suggestions are greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Mysql advanced SELECT, or multiple SELECTS? Movies keywords

  - by Supyxy

  I have a mysql database with movies as follows: MOVIES(id,title) KEYWORDS_TABLE(id,key_id) [id is referenced to movies.id, key_id is refernced to keywords.id] KEYWORDS(id,keyword) //this doesn't matter on my example.. Basically i have movies with their titles and plot keywords for each one, i want to select all movies that have the same keywords with with a given movie id. I tried something like: SELECT key_id FROM keywords_table WHERE id=9 doing that in php and storing all the IDs in an array $key_id.. then i build another select that looks like: SELECT movies.title FROM movies,keywords_table WHERE keywords_table.key_id=$key_id[1] OR keywords_table.key_id=$key_id[2] OR ......... OR keywords_table.key_id=$key_id[n] This kinda works but it takes too much time as we talk about a database with thousands of thousands of records. So, any suggestions?? thanks!

  Read the article

• Jquery Close/Open Multiple Toggles

  - by Pedro

  Hi, I have the toggle in my menu Working successfully for the two links that I have within it. Because the top link once toggled covers the other link, there is no problem. But since the link beneath it leaves the top link exposed, a user could click that and now have two toggled items open and pretty much stacked on top of each other. Is there a way for me to check if the other toggled item is open and if so, close it? Thanks! <div class="parents-toggle"> <a href="#" id="customize-toggle">Customize</a><br/> <div class="menu-toggle hidden" id="customize-menu"> <div class="menu-toggle-one"> <h3>Background</h3> <ul> <li><a href="#">Dark Wood</a></li> <li><a href="#">Wallpaper</a></li> <li><a href="#">Bricks</a></li> <li><a href="#">Planks</a></li> <li><a href="#">Default</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="menu-toggle-two"> <h3>Layout</h3> <ul> <li><a href="#">Grid</a></li> <li><a href="#">List</a></li> <li><a href="#">Full</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> <a href="/submit/">Submit video</a><br/> <div class="parents-toggle"> <a href="#" id="channels-toggle">Channels</a> <div class="menu-toggle hidden" id="channels-menu"> <div class="menu-toggle-one"> <ul> <li><a href="#">Automotive</a></li> <li><a href="#">Comedy</a></li> <li><a href="#">Movies</a></li> <li><a href="#">Weather</a></li> </ul> </div> <div class="menu-toggle-two"> <ul> <li><a href="#">Business</a></li> <li><a href="#">Commercials</a></li> <li><a href="#">Music</a></li> <li><a href="#">Technology</a></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div> </div> <script> $("#customize-toggle").click(function () { $("#customize-menu").toggle(); }); $("#channels-toggle").click(function () { $("#channels-menu").toggle(); }); </script>

  Read the article

• DDD and Entity Base, Model using multiple identity types

  - by Thomas

  I have a model that looks like this: public interface IEntity { int Id { get; set; } } Then the idea is to have my entities inherit from this interface: public class User : IEntity { public int Id { get; set; } } However, one of my entities actually has a Guid as an identifier. public class UserSession { public Guid Id { get; set; } } I really would like all my entities inheriting from the same interface but that would force me to add an integer based identity column to the UserSession which is unnecessary since Guid is the identity, but it would keep the domain model nice since all entities would inherit from the same base. What options do I have in this scenario? Can I have two base interfaces, one for int and one for Guid? Should I add an identity column into the UserSession entity although it is unnecessary? I need the Guid so I can't just get rid of it and replace it with and integer. Any thoughts on best practices?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233  | Next Page >