shared_ptr as class member
- by idimba
It's common to declared contained objects as a pointers to that class, while "forward declarating" them in header file. This in order to reduce physical dependencies in code.
For example
class B; // forward declaration
class A {
private:
B* pB;
};
Would it be good idea to declare such a member as shared_ptr, instead of naked pointer?
I would prefer scoped_ptr, but AFAIKit it won't be in standard.
