Search Results

Search found 33811 results on 1353 pages for 'public folders'.

Page 229/1353 | < Previous Page | 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236  | Next Page >

• Java abstract visitor - guarantueed to succeed? If so, why?

  - by disown

  I was dealing with hibernate, trying to figure out the run-time class behind proxied instances by using the visitor pattern. I then came up with an AbstractVisitable approach, but I wonder if it will always produce correct results. Consider the following code: interface Visitable { public void accept(Visitor v); } interface Visitor { public void visit(Visitable visitorHost); } abstract class AbstractVisitable implements Visitable { @Override public void accept(Visitor v) { v.visit(this); } } class ConcreteVisitable extends AbstractVisitable { public static void main(String[] args) { final Visitable visitable = new ConcreteVisitable(); final Visitable proxyVisitable = (Visitable) Proxy.newProxyInstance( Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(), new Class<?>[] { Visitable.class }, new InvocationHandler() { @Override public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { return method.invoke(visitable, args); } }); proxyVisitable.accept(new Visitor() { @Override public void visit(Visitable visitorHost) { System.out.println(visitorHost.getClass()); } }); } } This makes a ConcreteVisitable which inherits the accept method from AbstractVisitable. In c++, I would consider this risky, since this in AbstractVisitable could be referencing to AbstractVisitable::this, and not ConcreteVisitable::this. I was worried that the code under certain circumstances would print class AbstractVisible. Yet the code above outputs class ConcreteVisitable, even though I hid the real type behind a dynamic proxy (the most difficult case I could come up with). Is the abstract visitor approach above guaranteed to work, or are there some pitfalls with this approach? What guarantees are given in Java with respect to the this pointer?

  Read the article

• How to Map Two Tables To One Class in Fluent NHibernate

  - by Richard Nagle

  I am having a problem with fluent nhiberbate mapping two tables to one class. I have the following database schema: TABLE dbo.LocationName ( LocationId INT PRIMARY KEY, LanguageId INT PRIMARY KEY, Name VARCHAR(200) ) TABLE dbo.Language ( LanguageId INT PRIMARY KEY, Locale CHAR(5) ) And want to build the following class definition: public class LocationName { public virtual int LocationId { get; private set; } public virtual int LanguageId { get; private set; } public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual string Locale { get; set; } } Here is my mapping class: public LocalisedNameMap() { WithTable("LocationName"); UseCompositeId() .WithKeyProperty(x => x.LanguageId) .WithKeyProperty(x => x.LocationId); Map(x => x.Name); WithTable("Language", lang => { lang.WithKeyColumn("LanguageId"); lang.Map(x => x.Locale); }); } The problem is with the mapping of the Locale field being from another table, and in particular that the keys between those tables don't match. Whenever I run the application with this mapping I get the following error on startup: Foreign key (FK7FC009CCEEA10EEE:Language [LanguageId])) must have same number of columns as the referenced primary key (LocationName [LanguageId, LocationId]) How do I tell nHibernate to map from LocationName to Language using only the LanguageId field?

  Read the article

• Sending a JSON object to an ASP.NET web service using JQUERY ajax function

  - by uzay95

  I want to create object on the client side of aspx page. And i want to add functions to these javascript classes to make easier the life. Actually i can get and use the objects (derived from the server side classes) which returns from the services. When i wanted to send objects from the client by jquery ajax methods, i couldn't do it :) This is my javascript object: function ClassAndMark(_mark, _lesson){ this.Lesson = _lesson; this.Mark = _mark; } function Student(_name, _surname, _classAndMark){ this.Name = _name; this.SurName = _surname; this.ClassAndMark = _classAndMark; } JSClass.prototype.fSaveToDB(){ $.ajax({ type: "POST", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", url: "/WS/SaveObject.asmx/fSaveToDB"), data: ????????????, dataType: "json" }); } Actually i don't know what should be definition of classes and methods on the Server side but i think: class ClassAndMark{ public string Lesson ; public string Mark ; } class Student{ public string Name ; public string SurName ; public ClassAndMark ClassAndMark ; } Web service is below but again i couldn't get what should be instead of the ???? : [WebMethod()] public void fSaveToDB(???? _obj) { // How can i convert input parameter/parameters // of method in the server side object? }

  Read the article

• Why won't WPF databindings show text when ToString() has a collaborating object?

  - by Jay

  In a simple form, I bind to a number of different objects -- some go in listboxes; some in textblocks. A couple of these objects have collaborating objects upon which the ToString() method calls when doing its work -- typically a formatter of some kind. When I step through the code I see that when the databinding is being set up, ToString() is called the collaborating object is not null and returns the expected result when inspected in the debugger, the objects return the expected result from ToString() BUT the text does not show up in the form. The only common thread I see is that these use a collaborating object, whereas the other bindings that show up as expected simply work from properties and methods of the containing object. If this is confusing, here is the gist in code: public class ThisThingWorks { private SomeObject some_object; public ThisThingWorks(SomeObject s) { some_object = s; } public override string ToString() { return some_object.name; } } public class ThisDoesntWork { private Formatter formatter; private SomeObject some_object; public ThisDoesntWork(SomeObject o, Formatter f) { formatter = f; some_object = o; } public override string ToString() { return formatter.Format(some_object.name); } } Again, let me reiterate -- the ToString() method works in every other context -- but when I bind to the object in WPF and expect it to display the result of ToString(), I get nothing. Update: The issue seems to be what I see as a buggy behaviour in the TextBlock binding. If I bind the Text property to a property of the DataContext that is declared as an interface type, ToString() is never called. If I change the property declaration to an implementation of the interface, it works as expected. Other controls, like Label work fine when binding the Content property to a DataContext property declared as either the implementation or the interface. Because this is so far removed from the title and content of this question, I've created a new question here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2917878/why-doesnt-textblock-databinding-call-tostring-on-a-property-whose-compile-tim

  Read the article

• Update/Insert without select

  - by user348731

  I have this very simple class public class ProductAttributeValuePortal { public virtual int ID { get; set; } public virtual Domain.Entity.Portals.ProductPortal Product { get; set; } public virtual Attribute Attribute { get; set; } public virtual string Value { get; set; } } with this very simple map public ProductAttributeValueMap () { Table("DM.dbo.ProductAttributeValues"); Id(x => x.ID, "ProductAttributeValue_id"); References(x => x.Product); References(x => x.Attribute); Map(x => x.Value); } Each time i make a insert NHibernate makes a Select of the attribute like : NHibernate: INSERT INTO MachineData.dbo.ProductAttributeValues (Value, Product_id, Attribute_id) VALUES (@p0, @p1, @p2); select SCOPE_IDENTITY();@p0 = '6745', @p1 = 39, @p2 = 'BSTD' NHibernate: SELECT attribute_.Attribute_id, attribute_.Name as Name21_, attribute_.AttributeType as Attribut3_21_, attribute_.TagName as TagName21_, attribute_.MapTo as MapTo21_ FROM MachineShared.dbo.Attributes attribute_ WHERE attribute_.Attribute_id=@p0;@p0 = 'DLB' What am i doing wrong. And where do i find some really uptodate books about nhibernate/Fluent nhibernate

  Read the article

• Upcasting without any added data fields.

  - by Benjamin Manns

  In my project I have a generic Packet class. I would like to be able to upcast to other classes (like LoginPacket or MovePacket). The base class contains a command and arguments (greatly simplified): public class Packet { public String Command; public String[] Arguments; } I would like to have be able to convert from Packet to LoginPacket (or any other) based on a check if Packet.Command == "LOGIN". The login packet would not contain any new data members, but only methods for accessing specific arguments. For example: public class LoginPacket : Packet { public String Username { get { return Arguments[0]; } set { Arguments[0] == value; } } public String Password { get { return Arguments[1]; } set { Arguments[1] == value; } } } It would be great if I could run a simple code that would cast from Packet to LoginPacket with something like LoginPacket _Login = (LoginPacket)_Packet;, but that throws a System.InvalidCastException. It seems like this would be an easy task, as no new data is included, but I can't figure out any other way than copying everything from the Packet class to a new LoginPacket class.

  Read the article

• How do I serialize/deserialize a NHibernate entity that has references to other objects?

  - by Daniel T.

  I have two NHibernate-managed entities that have a bi-directional one-to-many relationship: public class Storage { public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual IList<Box> Boxes { get; set; } } public class Box { public virtual string Box { get; set; } [DoNotSerialize] public virtual Storage ParentStorage { get; set; } } A Storage can contain many Boxes, and a Box always belongs in a Storage. I want to edit a Box's name, so I send it to the client using JSON. Note that I don't serialize ParentStorage because I'm not changing which storage it's in. The client edits the name and sends the Box back as JSON. The server deserializes it back into a Box entity. Problem is, the ParentStorage property is null. When I try to save the Box to the database, it updates the name, but also removes the relationship to the Storage. How do I properly serialize and deserialize an entity like a Box, while keeping the JSON data size to a minimum?

  Read the article

• Create a new webpage using a WCF service

  - by sweeney

  Hello, I'd like to create WCF operation contract which consumes a string, produces a public webpage and then returns the address of this new page. [ServiceContract(Namespace = "")] public class DatabaseService { [OperationContract] public string BuildPage(string fileName, string html) { //writes html to file //returns public file url } } This doesn't seem like it should be complicated but i cant figure out how to do it. So far what i've tried is this: [OperationContract] public string PrintToFile(string name, string text) { FileInfo f = new FileInfo(name); StreamWriter w = f.AppendText(); w.Write(text); w.Close(); return f.Directory.ToString(); } Here's the problem. This does not create a file in the web root, it creates it in the directory where the webdav server is running. When i run this on an IIS server it seems to do nothing at all (at least not that i can tell). How can I get a handle to the webroot programmatically so that i can place the resultant file there and then return the public URL? I can tack on the domain name after the fact without issue so if it only returns the relative path to the file that's fine. Thanks, brian

  Read the article

• C# "Rename" Property in Derived Class

  - by Eric

  When you read this you'll be awfully tempted to give advice like "this is a bad idea for the following reason..." Bear with me. I know there are other ways to approach this. This question should be considered trivia. Lets say you have a class "Transaction" that has properties common to all transactions such as Invoice, Purchase Order, and Sales Receipt. Let's take the simple example of Transaction "Amount", which is the most important monetary amount for a given transaction. public class Transaction { public double Amount { get; set; } public TxnTypeEnum TransactionType { get; set; } } This Amount may have a more specific name in a derived type... at least in the real world. For example, the following values are all actually the same thing: Transaction - Amount Invoice - Subtotal PurchaseOrder - Total Sales Receipt - Amount So now I want a derived class "Invoice" that has a Subtotal rather than the generically-named Amount. Ideally both of the following would be true: In an instance of Transaction, the Amount property would be visible. In an instance of Invoice, the Amount property would be hidden, but the Subtotal property would refer to it internally. Invoice looks like this: public class Invoice : Transaction { new private double? Amount { get { return base.Amount; } set { base.Amount = value; } } // This property should hide the generic property "Amount" on Transaction public double? SubTotal { get { return Amount; } set { Amount = value; } } public double RemainingBalance { get; set; } } But of course Transaction.Amount is still visible on any instance of Invoice. Thanks for taking a look!

  Read the article

• Thread Locking CollectionViewSource

  - by Robert

  I added an event handler to my code and it broke all access to the CollectionViewSources in the SystemHTA class saying "The calling thread cannot access this object because a different thread owns it". My class was working when "this.systemHTA = new SystemHTA();" was placed outside of the DeviceManager_StateChanged() function. public partial class MainWindow : Window { private DeviceManager DeviceManager = DeviceManager.Instance; public SystemHTA systemHTA; public MainWindow() { InitializeComponent(); } private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { DeviceManager.StateChanged += new EventHandler<DeviceManagerStateChangedEventArgs>(DeviceManager_StateChanged); DeviceManager.Initialize(); } void DeviceManager_StateChanged(object sender, DeviceManagerStateChangedEventArgs e) { if (e.State == DeviceManagerState.Operational) { this.systemHTA = new SystemHTA(); } } private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { this.systemHTA.GetViewSourceTest(); } } public class SystemHTA { private CollectionViewSource _deviceTestSource; public SystemHTA() { _deviceTestSource = new CollectionViewSource(); _deviceTestSource.Source = CreateLoadData<HWController>.ControllerCollection; } public void GetViewSourceTest() { ListCollectionView view = (ListCollectionView)_deviceTestSource.View; //This creates an error saying a thread already owns _deviceTestSource } }

  Read the article

• Should conditional expressions go inside or outside of classes?

  - by Rupert

  It seems that often I will want to execute some methods from a Class when I call it and choosing which function will depend on some condition. This leads me to write classes like in Case 1 because it allows me to rapidly include their functionality. The alternative would be Case 2 which can take a lot of time if there is a lot of code and also means more code being written twice when I drop the Class into different pages. Having said that, Case 1 feels very wrong for some reason that I can't quite put my finger on. I haven't really seen any classes written like this, I suppose. Is there anything wrong with writing classes like in Case 1 or is Case 2 superior? Or is there a better way? What the advantages and disadvantages of each? Case 1 class Foo { public function __construct($bar) { if($bar = 'action1') $this->method1(); else if($bar = 'action2') $this->method2(); else $this->method1(); } public function method1() { } public function method2() { } } $bar = 'action1' $foo = new Foo($bar); Case 2 class Foo { public function __construct() { } public function method1() { } public function method2() { } } $foo = new Foo; $bar = 'action1'; if($bar == 'action1') $foo->method1(); else if($bar == 'action2') $foo->method2(); else $foo->method1();

  Read the article

• Socket - Adress already in use

  - by Hamza Karmouda

  I'm new to socketand i try to code an Server and client on the same application just to see how it work. here's my code : public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); ((Button)this.findViewById(R.id.bouton1)).setOnClickListener(this); } public void onClick(View v) { TCPServer server = new TCPServer(); TCPClient client = new TCPClient(); server.start(); client.start(); } public class TCPServer extends Thread { @Override public void run() { try { ServerSocket s = new ServerSocket(8080,0,InetAddress.getLocalHost()); Socket cli = s.accept(); byte[] b = new byte[512]; int n; InputStream is = cli.getInputStream(); while((n=is.read(b))>0){ Log.d("TCPServer",new String(b)); if(new String(b).contains("\r\n\r\n"))break; b = new byte[512]; } OutputStream os = cli.getOutputStream(); os.write("Hello".getBytes()); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } public class TCPClient extends Thread { @Override public void run() { try { Socket s = new Socket(InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostAddress(),8080); //Socket s = new Socket("www.google.com",80); //Log.i("",s.getLocalAddress().getHostAddress()); byte[] b = new byte[512]; int n; if (s.isConnected()) { OutputStream os = s.getOutputStream(); os.write("Hi How are you \r\n\r\n".getBytes()); InputStream is = s.getInputStream(); while((n=is.read(b))>0){ Log.d("TCPClient",new String(b)); b = new byte[512]; } } s.close(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } the code work fine but just for the first time i click my button. the error is java.net.BindException: Address already in use .

  Read the article

• QObject::connect not connecting signal to slot

  - by user1662800

  I am using C++ and Qt in my project and my problem is QObject::connect function doesn't connect signal to a slot. I have the following classes: class AddCommentDialog : public QDialog { Q_OBJECT public: ...some functions signals: void snippetAdded(); private slots: void on_buttonEkle_clicked(); private: Ui::AddCommentDialog *ui; QString snippet; }; A part of my Main window: class MainWindow : public QMainWindow { Q_OBJECT public: explicit MainWindow(QWidget *parent = 0); ~MainWindow(); private slots: void commentAddedSlot(); void variableAddedSlot(); ... private: AddCommentDialog *addCommentDialog; ... }; Ant the last dialog; class AddDegiskenDialog : public QDialog { Q_OBJECT public: ... signals: void variableAdded(); private slots: void on_buttonEkle_clicked(); private: Ui::AddDegiskenDialog *ui; ... }; In the main window constructor i connect signals and slots: addCommentDialog=new AddCommentDialog(); addDegiskenDialog=new AddDegiskenDialog(); connect(addDegiskenDialog, SIGNAL(variableAdded()), this, SLOT(variableAddedSlot())); connect(addCommentDialog, SIGNAL(snippetAdded()), this, SLOT(commentAddedSlot())); The point is my commentAddedSlot is connected to it's signal successfully, but commentAddedSlot is failed. There is the Q_OBJECT macros, no warning such as about no x slot. In addition to this, receivers(SIGNAL(snippetAdded())) gives me 1 but receivers(SIGNAL(variableAdded())) gives me 0 and i used commands qmake -project; qmake and make to fully compile. What am i missing?

  Read the article

• When should EntityManagerFactory instance be created/opened ?

  - by masato-san

  Ok, I read bunch of articles/examples how to write Entity Manager Factory in singleton. One of them easiest for me to understand a bit: http://javanotepad.blogspot.com/2007/05/jpa-entitymanagerfactory-in-web.html I learned that EntityManagerFactory (EMF) should only be created once preferably in application scope. And also make sure to close the EMF once it's used (?) So I wrote EMF helper class for business methods to use: public class EmProvider { private static final String DB_PU = "KogaAlphaPU"; public static final boolean DEBUG = true; private static final EmProvider singleton = new EmProvider(); private EntityManagerFactory emf; private EmProvider() {} public static EmProvider getInstance() { return singleton; } public EntityManagerFactory getEntityManagerFactory() { if(emf == null) { emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(DB_PU); } if(DEBUG) { System.out.println("factory created on: " + new Date()); } return emf; } public void closeEmf() { if(emf.isOpen() || emf != null) { emf.close(); } emf = null; if(DEBUG) { System.out.println("EMF closed at: " + new Date()); } } }//end class And my method using EmProvider: public String foo() { EntityManager em = null; List<Object[]> out = null; try { em = EmProvider.getInstance().getEntityManagerFactory().createEntityManager(); Query query = em.createNativeQuery(JPQL_JOIN); //just some random query out = query.getResultList(); } catch(Exception e) { //handle error.... } finally { if(em != null) { em.close(); //make sure to close EntityManager } } I made sure to close EntityManager (em) within method level as suggested. But when should EntityManagerFactory be closed then? And why EMF has to be singleton so bad??? I read about concurrency issues but as I am not experienced multi-thread-grammer, I can't really be clear on this idea.

  Read the article

• Having trouble uploading a file

  - by neo skosana

  Hi I am having trouble uploading a file. First of all I have a class: class upload { private $name; private $document; public function __construct($nme,$doc) { $this->setName($nme); $this->setDocument($doc); } public function setName($nme) { $this->name = $nme; } public function setDocument($doc) { $this->document = $doc; } public function fileNotPdf() { /* Was the file a PDF? */ if ($this->document['type'] != "application/pdf") { return true; } else { return false; } } public function fileNotUploaded() { /* Make sure that the file was POSTed. */ if (!(is_uploaded_file($this->document['tmp_name']))) { return true; } else { return false; } } public function fileNotMoved($repositry) { /* move uploaded file to final destination. */ $result = move_uploaded_file($this->document['tmp_name'], "$repositry/$this->name.pdf"); if($result) { return false; } else { return true; } } } Now for my main page: $docName = $_POST['name']; $page = $_FILES['doc']; if($_POST['submit']) { /* Set a few constants */ $filerepository = "np"; $uploadObj = new upload($docName, $page); if($uploadObj->fileNotUploaded()) { promptUser("There was a problem uploading the file.",""); } elseif($uploadObj->fileNotPdf()) { promptUser("File must be in pdf format.",""); } elseif($uploadObj->fileNotMoved($filerepository)) { promptUser("File could not be uploaded to final destination.",""); } else { promptUser("File has been successfully uploaded.",""); } } The errors that I get: Warning: move_uploaded_file(about.pdf)[function.move-uploaded-file]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in... Warning: move_uploaded_file()[function.move-uploaded-file]: Unable to move 'c:\xampp\tmp\php13.tmp' to 'about.pdf' in... File could not be uploaded to final destination.

  Read the article

• Is this a correct way to stop Execution Task

  - by Yan Cheng CHEOK

  I came across code to stop execution's task. private final ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(); public void stop() { executor.shutdownNow(); try { executor.awaitTermination(100, TimeUnit.DAYS); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { log.error(null, ex); } } public Runnable getRunnable() { return new Runnable() { public void run() { while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) { // What if inside fun(), someone try to clear the interrupt flag? // Say, through Thread.interrupted(). We will stuck in this loop // forever. fun(); } } }; } I realize that, it is possible for Runnable to be in forever loop, as Unknown fun may Thread.sleep, clear the interrupt flag and ignore the InterruptedException Unknown fun may Thread.interrupted, clear the interrupt flag. I was wondering, is the following way correct way to fix the code? private final ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(); private volatile boolean flag = true; public void stop() { flag = false; executor.shutdownNow(); try { executor.awaitTermination(100, TimeUnit.DAYS); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { log.error(null, ex); } } public Runnable getRunnable() { return new Runnable() { public void run() { while (flag && !Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) { // What if inside fun(), someone try to clear the interrupt flag? // Say, through Thread.interrupted(). We will stuck in this loop // forever. fun(); } } }; }

  Read the article

• How to build a control programatically?

  - by W_K

  I have custom control written in Java. For the sake of simplicity lets assume that it looks like this: public class HelloworldControl extends UIComponentBase { @Override public void decode(FacesContext context) { String cid = this.getClientId(context); ... super.decode(context); } @Override public void encodeBegin(FacesContext context) throws IOException { ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter(); writer.writeText("Hello world!", this); // I want a view!! } @Override public void encodeEnd(FacesContext context) throws IOException { ResponseWriter writer = context.getResponseWriter(); ... } public void restoreState(FacesContext context, Object state) { Object values[] = (Object[]) state; ... super.restoreState(context, values[0]); } public Object saveState(FacesContext context) { Object values[] = ... } } I would like to add programatically child control to it. For example I would like a child view control to render a view just under the Hellow world text. How can i do this? What is the standard procedure to build dynamically a control? To put it simply - I want programatically build a hierarchy of standard components and I want to attach it to my control.

  Read the article

• Calling from C# to C function which accept a struct array allocated by caller

  - by lifey

  I have the following C struct struct XYZ { void *a; char fn[MAX_FN]; unsigned long l; unsigned long o; }; And I want to call the following function from C#: extern "C" int func(int handle, int *numEntries, XYZ *xyzTbl); Where xyzTbl is an array of XYZ of size numEntires which is allocated by the caller I have defined the following C# struct: [System.Runtime.InteropServices.StructLayoutAttribute(System.Runtime.InteropServices.LayoutKind.Sequential, CharSet = System.Runtime.InteropServices.CharSet.Ansi)] public struct XYZ { public System.IntPtr rva; [System.Runtime.InteropServices.MarshalAsAttribute(System.Runtime.InteropServices.UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 128)] public string fn; public uint l; public uint o; } and a method: [System.Runtime.InteropServices.DllImport(@"xyzdll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)] public static extern Int32 func(Int32 handle, ref Int32 numntries, [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPArray)] XYZ[] arr); Then I try to call the function : XYZ xyz = new XYZ[numEntries]; for (...) xyz[i] = new XYZ(); func(handle,numEntries,xyz); Of course it does not work. Can someone shed light on what I am doing wrong ?

  Read the article

• JPA entitylisteners and @embeddable

  - by seanizer

  I have a class hierarchy of JPA entities that all inherit from a BaseEntity class: @MappedSuperclass @EntityListeners( { ValidatorListener.class }) public abstract class BaseEntity implements Serializable { // other stuff } I want all entities that implement a given interface to be validated automatically on persist and/or update. Here's what I've got. My ValidatorListener: public class ValidatorListener { private enum Type { PERSIST, UPDATE } @PrePersist public void checkPersist(final Object entity) { if (entity instanceof Validateable) { this.check((Validateable) entity, Type.PERSIST); } } @PreUpdate public void checkUpdate(final Object entity) { if (entity instanceof Validateable) { this.check((Validateable) entity, Type.UPDATE); } } private void check(final Validateable entity, final Type persist) { switch (persist) { case PERSIST: if (entity instanceof Persist) { ((Persist) entity).persist(); } if (entity instanceof PersistOrUpdate) { ((PersistOrUpdate) entity).persistOrUpdate(); } break; case UPDATE: if (entity instanceof Update) { ((Update) entity).update(); } if (entity instanceof PersistOrUpdate) { ((PersistOrUpdate) entity).persistOrUpdate(); } break; default: break; } } } and here's my Validateable interface that it checks against (the outer interface is just a marker, the inner contain the methods): public interface Validateable { interface Persist extends Validateable { void persist(); } interface PersistOrUpdate extends Validateable { void persistOrUpdate(); } interface Update extends Validateable { void update(); } } All of this works, however I would like to extend this behavior to Embeddable classes. I know two solutions: call the validation method of the embeddable object manually from the entity validation method: public void persistOrUpdate(){ // validate my own properties first // then manually validate the embeddable property: myEmbeddable.persistOrUpdate(); // this works but I'd like something that I don't have to call manually } use reflection, checking all properties to see if their type is of one of their interface types. This would work, but it's not pretty. Is there a more elegant solution?

  Read the article

• Rescuing a failed WCF call

  - by illdev

  Hello, I am happily using Castle's WcfFacility. From Monorail I know the handy concept of Rescues - consumer friendly results that often, but not necessarily, contain Data about what went wrong. I am creating a Silverlight application right now, doing quite a few WCF service calls. All these request return an implementation of public class ServiceResponse { private string _messageToUser = string.Empty; private ActionResult _result = ActionResult.Success; public ActionResult Result // Success, Failure, Timeout { get { return _result; } set { _result = value; } } public string MessageToUser { get { return _messageToUser; } set { _messageToUser = value; } } } public abstract class ServiceResponse<TResponseData> : ServiceResponse { public TResponseData Data { get; set; } } If the service has trouble responding the right way, I would want the thrown Exception to be intercepted and converted to the expected implementation. base on the thrown exception, I would want to pass on a nice message. here is how one of the service methods looks like: [Transaction(TransactionMode.Requires)] public virtual SaveResponse InsertOrUpdate(WarehouseDto dto) { var w = dto.Id > 0 ? _dao.GetById(dto.Id) : new Warehouse(); w.Name = dto.Name; _dao.SaveOrUpdate(w); return new SaveResponse { Data = new InsertData { Id = w.Id } }; } I need the thrown Exception for the Transaction to be rolled back, so i cannot actually catch it and return something else. Any ideas, where I could hook in?

  Read the article

• StructureMap Open Generic Types

  - by Shane Fulmer

  I have the following classes: public interface IRenderer<T> { string Render(T obj); } public class Generic<T> { } public class SampleGenericRenderer<T> : IRenderer<Generic<T>> { public string Render(Generic<T> obj) { throw new NotImplementedException(); } } I would like to be able to call StructureMap with ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IRenderer<Generic<string>>>(); and receive SampleGenericRenderer<string>. I'm currently using the following registration and receiving this error when I call GetInstance. "Unable to cast object of type 'ConsoleApplication1.SampleGenericRenderer'1[ConsoleApplication1.Generic'1[System.String]]' to type 'ConsoleApplication1.IRenderer'1[ConsoleApplication1.Generic'1[System.String]]'." public class CoreRegistry : Registry { public CoreRegistry() { Scan(assemblyScanner => { assemblyScanner.AssemblyContainingType(typeof(IRenderer<>)); assemblyScanner.AddAllTypesOf(typeof(IRenderer<>)); assemblyScanner.ConnectImplementationsToTypesClosing(typeof(IRenderer<>)); }); } } Is there any way to configure StructureMap so that it creates SampleGenericRenderer<string> instead of SampleGenericRenderer<Generic<string>>?

  Read the article

• Asp.net mvc inheritance controllers

  - by Ris90

  Hi, I'm studing asp.net mvc and in my test project I have some problems with inheritance: In my model I use inheritanse in few entities: public class Employee:Entity { /* few public properties */ } It is the base class. And descendants: public class RecruitmentOfficeEmployee: Employee { public virtual RecruitmentOffice AssignedOnRecruitmentOffice { get; set; } } public class ResearchInstituteEmployee: Employee { public virtual ResearchInstitute AssignedOnResearchInstitute { get; set; } } I want to implement a simple CRUD operations to every descedant. What is the better way to inplement controllers and views in descendants: - One controller per every descendant; - Controller inheritance; - Generic controller; - Generic methods in one controller. Or maybe there is an another way? My ORM is NHibernate, I have a generic base repository and every repository is its descedant. Using generic controller, I think, is the best way, but in it I will use only generic base repository and extensibility of the system will be not very good. Please, help the newbie)

  Read the article

• Facebook Android SDK. Error validating access token

  - by Mj1992

  I am trying to access user information from facebook sdk.But I keep getting this error. {"error":{"message":"Error validating access token: The session has been invalidated because the user has changed the password.","type":"OAuthException","code":190,"error_subcode":460}} Here is the call which returns me the error in the response parameter of the oncomplete function. mAsyncRunner.request("me", new RequestListener() { @Override public void onComplete(String response, Object state) { Log.d("Profile", response); String json = response; //<-- error in response try { JSONObject profile = new JSONObject(json); MainActivity.this.userid = profile.getString("id"); new GetUserProfilePic().execute(); runOnUiThread(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "Name: " + MainActivity.this.userid, Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } }); } catch (JSONException e) { e.printStackTrace(); Log.e("jsonexception",e.getMessage()); facebook.extendAccessTokenIfNeeded(MainActivity.this, null); GetUserInfo(); } } @Override public void onIOException(IOException e, Object state) { } @Override public void onFileNotFoundException(FileNotFoundException e, Object state) { } @Override public void onMalformedURLException(MalformedURLException e, Object state) { } @Override public void onFacebookError(FacebookError e, Object state) { } }); Sometimes I get the correct response also.I think this is due to the access token expiration if I am right. So can you guys tell me how to extend the access token although I've used this facebook.extendAccessTokenIfNeeded(this, null); in the onResume method of the activity. How to solve this?

  Read the article

• Various way to stop a thread - which is the correct way

  - by Yan Cheng CHEOK

  I had came across different suggestion of stopping a thread. May I know, which is the correct way? Or it depends? Using Thread Variable http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/guide/misc/threadPrimitiveDeprecation.html private volatile Thread blinker; public void stop() { blinker = null; } public void run() { Thread thisThread = Thread.currentThread(); while (blinker == thisThread) { try { thisThread.sleep(interval); } catch (InterruptedException e){ } repaint(); } } Using boolean flag private volatile boolean flag; public void stop() { flag = false; } public void run() { while (flag) { try { thisThread.sleep(interval); } catch (InterruptedException e){ } repaint(); } } Using Thread Variable together with interrupt private volatile Thread blinker; public void stop() { blinker.interrupt(); blinker = null; } public void run() { Thread thisThread = Thread.currentThread(); while (!thisThread.isInterrupted() && blinker == thisThread) { try { thisThread.sleep(interval); } catch (InterruptedException e){ } repaint(); } }

  Read the article

• Getting problem in threading in JAVA

  - by chetans

  In this program i want to stop GenerateImage & MovingImage Thread both... And i want to start those threads from begining. Can u send me the solution? Here is the code........ package Game; import java.applet.Applet; import java.awt.Color; import java.awt.Dimension; import java.awt.Graphics; import java.awt.Image; import java.awt.MediaTracker; import java.awt.event.KeyEvent; import java.awt.event.KeyListener; import java.net.MalformedURLException; import java.net.URL; public class ThreadInApplet extends Applet implements KeyListener { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; Image[] asteroidImage; Image spaceshipImage; String levelstr="Easy Level"; int[] XPos,YPos; int number=0,XPosOfSpaceship,YPosOfSpaceship,NoOfObstacles=5,speed=1,level=1,spaceBtnPressdCntr=0; boolean gameStart=false,pauseGame=false,collideUp=false,collideDown=false,collideLeft=false,collideRight=false; private Image offScreenImage; private Dimension offScreenSize; private Graphics offScreenGraphics; Thread GenerateImages,MoveImages; public void init() { try { GenerateImages=new Thread () //thread to create obstacles { synchronized public void run () { for(int g=0;g<NoOfObstacles;g++) { try { sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } number++; // Temporary counter to count the no of obstacles created } } } ; MoveImages=new Thread () //thread to move obstacles { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") synchronized public void run () { while(YPos[NoOfObstacles-1]!=600) { pauseGame=false; if(collide()==true) { GenerateImages.suspend(); repaint(); } else GenerateImages.resume(); for(int l=0;l<number;l++) { if(collide()==false) YPos[l]++; else GenerateImages.suspend(); } repaint(); try { sleep(speed); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if(YPos[NoOfObstacles-1]>=600) //level complete state { level++; try { levelUpdation(level); System.out.println("aahe"); } catch (MalformedURLException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } repaint(); } } }; initialPos(); spaceshipImage=getImage(new URL(getCodeBase(),"images/space.png")); for(int i=0;i<NoOfObstacles;i++) { asteroidImage[i]=getImage(new URL(getCodeBase(),"images/asteroid.png")); XPos[i]=(int) (Math.random()*700); YPos[i]=0; } MediaTracker tracker = new MediaTracker (this); for(int i=0;i<NoOfObstacles;i++) { tracker.addImage (asteroidImage[i], 0); } } catch (MalformedURLException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } setBackground(Color.black); addKeyListener(this); } //Sets initial positions of spaceship & obstacle images------------------------------------------------------ public void initialPos() throws MalformedURLException { asteroidImage=new Image[NoOfObstacles]; XPos=new int[NoOfObstacles]; YPos=new int[NoOfObstacles]; XPosOfSpaceship=getWidth()/2-35; YPosOfSpaceship=getHeight()-100; collideUp = false; collideDown=false; collideLeft=false; collideRight=false; } //level finished updations------------------------------------------------------------------------------ @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") public void levelUpdation(int level) throws MalformedURLException { NoOfObstacles=NoOfObstacles+20; speed=speed-3; System.out.println(NoOfObstacles+" "+speed); pauseGame=true; initialPos(); repaint(); } //paint method of graphics to print the messages--------------------------------------------------------- public void paint(Graphics g) { g.setColor(Color.white); if(gameStart==false) { g.drawString("SPACE to start", (getWidth()/2)-15, getHeight()/2); g.drawString(levelstr, (getWidth()/2), getHeight()/2+20); } if(level>1) { if(level==2) levelstr="Medium Level"; else levelstr="High Level"; g.drawString("Level Complete ", (getWidth()/2)-15, getHeight()/2); g.drawString(levelstr, (getWidth()/2), getHeight()/2+20); //g.drawString("SPACE to start", (getWidth()/2)-15, getHeight()/2+40); } for(int n=0;n<number;n++) { if(n>0) g.drawImage(asteroidImage[n],XPos[n],YPos[n],this); } g.drawImage(spaceshipImage,XPosOfSpaceship,YPosOfSpaceship,this); } //update method of graphics to print the messages--------------------------------------------------------- @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") public void update(Graphics g) { Dimension d = size(); if((offScreenImage == null) || (d.width != offScreenSize.width) || (d.height != offScreenSize.height)) { offScreenImage = createImage(d.width, d.height); offScreenSize = d; offScreenGraphics = offScreenImage.getGraphics(); } offScreenGraphics.clearRect(0, 0, d.width, d.height); paint(offScreenGraphics); g.drawImage(offScreenImage, 0, 0, null); } public void keyReleased(KeyEvent arg0){} public void keyTyped(KeyEvent arg0) {} //---------------------Key pressed event to start game & to move the spaceship-------------------------------------- public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if(e.getKeyCode()==32) { spaceBtnPressdCntr++; if(spaceBtnPressdCntr==1) { gameStart=true; GenerateImages.start(); MoveImages.start(); } } if(gameStart==true) { if(e.getKeyCode()==37) { new Thread () { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") synchronized public void run () { for(int cnt1=1;cnt1<=10;cnt1++) { if(collide()==true && collideLeft == true) { GenerateImages.suspend(); } else { if(XPosOfSpaceship>0) XPosOfSpaceship--; } } repaint(); } }.start(); } if(e.getKeyCode()==38) { new Thread () { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") synchronized public void run () { for(int cnt1=1;cnt1<=10;cnt1++) { if(collide()==true && collideUp == true) { GenerateImages.suspend(); } else { if(YPosOfSpaceship>10) YPosOfSpaceship--; } } repaint(); } }.start(); } if(e.getKeyCode()==39) { new Thread () { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") synchronized public void run () { for(int cnt1=1;cnt1<=10;cnt1++) { if(collide()==true && collideRight == true) { GenerateImages.suspend(); } else { if(XPosOfSpaceship<750) XPosOfSpaceship++; } } repaint(); } }.start(); } if(e.getKeyCode()==40) { new Thread () { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") synchronized public void run () { for(int cnt1=1;cnt1<=10;cnt1++) { if(collide()==true && collideDown == true) { GenerateImages.suspend(); } else { if(YPosOfSpaceship<550) YPosOfSpaceship++; } } repaint(); } }.start(); } } } //------------------------------Collision checking between Spaceship & obstacles------------------------------ public boolean collide() { int x1,y1,x2,y2,x3,y3,x4,y4; //coordinates of obstacles int a1,b1,a2,b2,a3,b3,a4,b4; //coordinates of spaceship a1 =XPosOfSpaceship; b1=YPosOfSpaceship; a2=a1+spaceshipImage.getWidth(this); b2=b1; a3=a1; b3=b1+spaceshipImage.getHeight(this); a4=a2; b4=b3; for(int a=0;a<number;a++) { x1 =XPos[a]; y1=YPos[a]; x2=x1+asteroidImage[a].getWidth(this); y2=y1; x3=x1; y3=y1+asteroidImage[a].getHeight(this); x4=x2; y4=y3; /********checking asteroid touch spaceship from up direction********/ if(y3==b1 && x4>=a1 && x4<=a2) { collideUp = true; collideDown=false; collideLeft=false; collideRight=false; return(true); } if(y3==b1 && x3>=a1 && x3<=a2) { collideUp = true; collideDown=false; collideLeft=false; collideRight=false; return(true); } /********checking asteroid touch spaceship from left direction******/ if(x2==a1 && y4>=b1 && y4<=b3) { collideLeft=true; collideUp = false; collideDown=false; collideRight=false; return(true); } if(x2==a1 && y2>=b1 && y2<=b3) { collideLeft=true; collideUp = false; collideDown=false; collideRight=false; return(true); } /********checking asteroid touch spaceship from right direction*****/ if(x1==a2 && y3>=b2 && y3<=b4) { collideRight=true; collideLeft=false; collideUp = false; collideDown=false; return(true); } if(x1==a2 && y1>=b2 && y1<=b4) { collideRight=true; collideLeft=false; collideUp = false; collideDown=false; return(true); } /********checking asteroid touch spaceship from down direction*****/ if(y1==b3 && x2>=a3 && x2<=a4) { collideDown=true; collideRight=false; collideLeft=false; collideUp = false; return(true); } if(y1==b3 && x1>=a3 && x1<=a4) { collideDown=true; collideRight=false; collideLeft=false; collideUp = false; return(true); } } return(false); } }

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236  | Next Page >