Search Results

Search found 17651 results on 707 pages for 'unix domain sockets'.

Page 239/707 | < Previous Page | 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246  | Next Page >

  • nginx folder redirect

    - by orbalon
    I'm trying redirect from an exact folder in nginx.conf Given the URL: domain.com/path1/path2/path3 Redirect to: sub.domain.com/path1/path2/path3 Here's what I have so far: location ~* ^/path1[\/?]$ { rewrite ^/(.*) http:sub.domain.com/$1 break; } I had it working with location /path1 { rewrite ^/(.*) http:sub.domain.com/$1 break; } The problem with that is it also redirects a page like domain.com/path1moretext/someotherpath to sub.domain.com/path1moretext/someotherpath Which is not what I want. (had to take out the "//" in the href code above because this is my first post, sorry).

    Read the article

  • Creating cookieless application on development machine with asp.net

    - by zaladane
    I am thinking about setting up a new domain to host static content on my website and have it cookieless just like Stackoverflow with their static domain. So before going ahead and buying the domain and setting it up I wanted to test it on my developement machine first under localhost (I have to mention that i am planning on having IIS running on my new domain for the static files). I therefore created a new application under IIS and disabled session state and forms authentication. When my main application needs resources like css, images and js , I use the path to the "static" application where they are hosted. The problem is that when I look at the request and the response for the requested files, they still have the session_id cookie defined as well as the asp.net authentication cookie. Is it at all possible to accomplish what i am trying to do on a development machine or do i have to just go ahead and purchase the new domain which hopefully with make things right? I tried to read about cookieless domain but can't figure out what i might be missing.

    Read the article

  • restricting access only through domains on nginx on virtual hosts

    - by Mo J. Mughrabi
    I have finished setting up nginx for virtual hosting, this is how my config files look like server { listen 80; server_name domain.com; access_log /home/domain.com/prod_webapp/logs/access.domain.com.log; error_log /home/domain.com/prod_webapp/logs/error.domain.com.log; location /static { root /home/domain.com/prod_webapp/mocorner/ph/; } location / { try_files $uri @uwsgi; } location @uwsgi { include uwsgi_params; uwsgi_pass unix:/tmp/domain_uwsgi.sock; }} on the same machine, I have domain1.com and domain2.com, each when i access I get its content which is great. My problem is that when i try to access the user using the IP address i get one of the sites in the virtual hosts too.. Although i disabled the default (removed the symbolic link) from sites-enabled folder but still not solved it for me. any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • IIS 6.0 FTP Folder Permissions

    - by Beuy
    I have a IIS Ftp website setup like so \ftp\users\domain\public\public Software that runs on clients computers logs into the FTP by specifying domain\public and moving to public, it then uploads or downloads files / folders into that area. I wan't to restrict the permissions on \ftp\users\domain\public so that nothing / noone can write files or folders here, only to \ftp\users\domain\public\public. I setup the NTFS permissions of the folder to remove domain\users, public and server\users to not have modify right, yet I can still upload / modify files. I have disabled inheritance from the parent folder of \ftp\users\domain\public as well. Any ideas on what I'm missing here? P.S I know this is a stupid setup and makes no sense, it's some bizarre legacy application that I need to migrate to a safer environment until it can be replaced, then I'm going to light it on fire -.- and dance around it.

    Read the article

  • Upgrading TFS 2005 to TFS 2010 fails at "Executing servicing step Upgrade Version Control Identities"

    - by nadeemmar
    Hi all, I have been trying to upgrade our TFS 2005 to TFS 2010 but with no luck so far. I went through the TFS Installation guide and many upgrade guides but with no luck in overcoming the issue I am facing which seems to be unique and different to other described issues. In our company, we have a domain forest with several domains. Lets say domain A, B, and C. TFS is in domain A and has users from all these three domains. All domains have trust reltionships between them. However, domain C was deleted several months ago. In the upgrade process, whenever I reach the collection upgrade step, the following error is raised: [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z][Informational] Step Data: ExtensionType = Microsoft.TeamFoundation.VersionControl.Server.PlugIns.WorkspaceSecurityNamespaceExtension [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z] Servicing step Create VersionControl Security Namespaces passed. (ServicingOperation: UpgradePreTfs2010Databases; Step group: Upgrade.TfsVersionControl) [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z] Executing servicing step Upgrade Version Control Identities. (ServicingOperation: UpgradePreTfs2010Databases; Step group: Upgrade.TfsVersionControl) [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z][Informational] Step Performer: VersionControl [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z][Informational] Step Type: UpgradeIdentity [Info @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:47Z][Informational] Step Data Text: [Error @09:57:50.997] [2010-12-29 09:55:51Z][Error] Sync error for identity: System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity, S-1-5-21-1004336348-527237240-682003330-2818 - The trust relationship between the primary domain and the trusted domain failed I looked for the SID and it seems to be for a user in the deleted domain C. With a bit of googling, I figured out that TFSConfig Identities command can be used to remap users from one domain to the other. I went ahead and created local users that matches the users we have from domain C and ran the TFSConfig Identities /Change command and it executed successfully. However, I still get the same error. I am stuck and can't figure out how to move forward :( I need your expertise, has anyone faced this issue before? Do I need to change these identities on TFS 2005 before I commence the upgrade? I forgot to mention, I am following the upgrade with a move approach. I created a virtual machine for testing the upgrade. Installed SQL server 2008, restored the TFS databases and installed TFS 2010 and ran the upgrade wizard. Regards, Nadeem

    Read the article

  • LDAP Authentication for multiple AD Domains

    - by TrevJen
    I have 3 full trust domains (2 child and one root). I need to use LDAP to allow authntication for domain users. The trick is that I need the application to use an AD server for the child domain BUT proxy the LDAP query and authentication for the root domain. I see that it maty be possible with AD LDS and some trusts and synching, but it looks pretty hairy and overly complicated. The short of it is: 3 domains (Parent, ChildA, ChildB) My 3rd party app will need to use ChildA domain servers to authenticate either: a. a user in the parent domain or b. a user in the ChildB domain I already have full trusts between all domains, and regular NTLM authentication works fine (unless you are trying to authenticate with LDAP)

    Read the article

  • Hostname Problem On WHM / cPanel Installation

    - by Eray
    My CentOS 5.6 server's hostname was "centos" . And then i change it to my domain : hostname domain.com And i started to installing WHM / cPanel as explained in here : http://etwiki.cpanel.net/twiki/bin/view/AllDocumentation/InstallationGuide/InstallingCpanel It's installed very well. And the i reboot my server. After rebooting, i was execute this command for open WHM's 2087 port : iptables -I RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2087 -j ACCEPT Now i'm trying to browse domain.com:2087 i'm getting Server (centos) not found .I noticed it's forwarding to my old hostname (centos) . And then execute this command to verify me hostname hostname it's returned "centos" again. I'm not sure, why it's returned to old hostname. (I think it returned to old hostname after rebooting) . I'm changed it one more time : hostname domain.com Finally, now my hostname is domain.com . BUt still i'm getting centos server not found error. This is result of iptables -L command. P.S. : domain.com/cpanel is working

    Read the article

  • Rewrite request URI based on Host header in HAProxy

    - by DorinC
    I would like to set up HAProxy to forward HTTP requests to some backend servers but I need it to also rewrite the URI part based on the Host. I've read through the doc but it seems that reqirep isn't suitable for this purpose. Any idea if this is even possible with HAProxy? Here are the details of what I'm trying to accomplish: Requests that come in on: http://www.original-domain.com/ would be balanced between: http://server1/domains/www.original-domain.com/ ... http://serverN/domains/www.original-domain.com/ The proxy should be able to handle this for any number of domains (original-domain.com can be anything, it's not limited to a fixed set of values). For this to work HAProxy would need to rewrite a request like this: GET /original-uri HTTP/1.1 Host: original-domain.com to: GET /domains/original-domain.com/original-uri HTTP/1.1 Host: serverN and forward that request to one of the internal servers.

    Read the article

  • Access Java based keystore directly on Sun ONE Webserver 6.1

    - by George Bailey
    The keystore seems to reside in one of /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-cert8.db /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-key3.db What tool would I use to access this file? I have tried these commands which did not work. /opt/SUNWwbsvr/bin/https/jdk/bin/keytool -certreq -keyalg RSA -file /tmp/test.csr -keystore /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-cert8.db /opt/SUNWwbsvr/bin/https/jdk/bin/keytool -certreq -keyalg RSA -file /tmp/test.csr -keystore /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-key3.db /opt/SUNWwbsvr/bin/https/jdk/bin/keytool -list -storepass password -keystore /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-cert8.db /opt/SUNWwbsvr/bin/https/jdk/bin/keytool -list -storepass password -keystore /opt/SUNWwbsvr/alias/https-sub.domain.ext-hostname-key3.db They all gave me the error message keytool error: java.io.IOException: Invalid keystore format

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu, apache2 wildcard dns to subdomain

    - by Mark van Velthoven
    Currently I'm hosting my own (ubuntu) server with the following services: samba, ftp and a webserver. I've bought a domain and linked the DNS A-record to my ISP's IP. This is working correctly. Now I'd like to use the DNS wildcard-record to create subdomains. I want to avoid waiting 24hrs before the DNS change completes. Thusfar I'm only able to redirect all incoming wildcards to the same directory: test1.domain.com redirects to /var/www test2.domain.com redirects to /var/www Although I'd like to get: test1.domain.com redirects to /var/www/test1 test2.domain.com redirects to /var/www/test2 My guess would be to change the file /etc/apache2/sites-available/domain. Any help or tips would be welcome! Thanks, Mark

    Read the article

  • Remotely managing Hyper-V VMs from Windows 8 Client

    - by Vazgen
    Currently, I have a core Hyper-V Server hosting VMs for a domain controller and several domain-joined VDI infrastructure servers. The VMs are connected in that domain environment, but the remote management of the physical Hyper-V Server is set up using the same WORKGROUP (as the Windows 8 client I'm managing from) This makes it cumbersome to manage the VMs hosted on the physical server from my remote management Windows 8 client because I can only connect to the physical Hyper-V server and not the individual VMs hosted inside. Can I make my set up more flexible by hosting a second domain controller in a VM hosted on my Windows 8 machine and switching my remote management set up to use the same domain through? Meaning ALL physical and virtual machines including the VDI infrastructure under the same domain? I'm new to this just looking for some suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Using NPS to restrict access to WLAN

    - by eric.s
    We currently have one WLAN that only domain users can connect to. We will be adding a guest WLAN and would like all non-domain machines to use this, even if a user has a domain account. We have set up NPS and can log in against it, but we can not restrict the connection option to be a domain computer AND a domain account. As a network policy it states that it moves along through each policy until it finds one that it accepts or runs out. For connection request policies Domain Computers is not an option. This is where I thought I may be able to stop it. Has anyone been able to successfully restrict this without manually adding MACs to the WLAN Controller?

    Read the article

  • DNS A vs NS record

    - by Tiddo
    I'm trying to understand DNS a bit better, but I still don't get A and NS records completely. As far as I understood, the A record tells which IP-address belongs to a (sub) domain, so far it was still clear to me. But as I understood, the NS record tells which nameserver points belongs to a (sub) domain, and that nameserver should tell which IP-address belongs to a (sub) domain. But that was already specified in the A record in the same DNS file. So can someone explain to me what the NS records and nameservers exactly do, because probably I understood something wrong. edit: As I understand you correctly, a NS record tells you were to find the DNS server with the A record for a certain domain, and the A record tells you which ip-address belongs to a domain. But what is the use of putting an A and an NS record in the same DNS file? If there is already an A record for a certain domain, then why do you need to point to another DNS server, which would probably give you the same information?

    Read the article

  • Email forwarding via spf record

    - by Y.G.J
    I have old-domain.co.il with several emails and a new-domain.co.il with the same email addresses. I don't want to connect my domain to a server via mx to make that transfer via email server. Is it possible to have a SPF record that get an email like [email protected] and transfer it to [email protected]? The new domain is on google apps and the old domain can be connected to the same apps, but how to do it, so emails will arrive only to the new one?

    Read the article

  • Strange permission errors with Windows Server 2008

    - by Spirit
    I just don't know a better way to describe my issue that is driving me nuts. I am trying to establish a test domain with virtual machines on a box that has Win7 with VMwware workstation installed. The purpouse with this domain will be so that we can try and test different situations before they go into the production network. I build a VM with WinSrv2008R2 and I am using that VM as a template to make other servers for the domain by making clones of it. Now I raise a DC with one clone and a member server with another clone - I add the server to the domain. I am following a standard procedure as always (it is not my first domain). Then I make an admin account and I am adding the admin to be a member of the Domain and Enterprise Admins group. That admin is admin with full priviledges on the DC.. no problem there. But on the other server has ... somewhat half the privileges and I cant log in via RDP. I tryed with another account. Same issues. For example (with half the privileges): I can't open the Even Viewer if I go via Start - Administrative Tools - Event Viewer. But I can open the Even Viewer via the server manager. You can notice this on the image below. I mean WTF??? I am going crazy, I haven't experienced anything similar in my three years of expertise. I already lost 3 days troubleshooting this. Could this be related with the cloning? Perhaps if I make fresh installs of WinSrv2008 there won't be any problems? I've had raised test domains as VMs on other occasions before, and there weren't any problems then. This is VMware Workstation 8. I've made clones before, on Workstation 7 it didn't had any problems. Anyone has any ideas? UPDATE: This is the info from the event log when I try to access via RDP: An account failed to log on. Subject: Security ID: NULL SID Account Name: - Account Domain: - Logon ID: 0x0 Logon Type: 3 Account For Which Logon Failed: Security ID: NULL SID Account Name: pat.coleman Account Domain: lab Failure Information: Failure Reason: Domain sid inconsistent. Status: 0xc000006d Sub Status: 0xc000019b

    Read the article

  • IIS 6.0 FTP Folder Permissions

    - by Beuy
    I have a IIS FTP website setup like this \ftp\users\domain\public\public Software that runs on clients computers logs into the FTP server by specifying domain\public and moving to public, it then uploads or downloads files / folders into that area. I want to restrict permissions on \ftp\users\domain\public so that nothing/nobody can write files or folders here, only to \ftp\users\domain\public\public. I setup the NTFS permissions of the folder to remove domain\users, public and server\users to not have modify right, yet I can still upload/modify files. I have disabled inheritance from the parent folder of \ftp\users\domain\public as well. Any ideas on what I'm missing here? P.S I know this is a stupid setup and makes no sense, it's some bizarre legacy application that I need to migrate to a safer environment until it can be replaced.

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2010 forwarded emails by external servers being blocked

    - by MadBoy
    Our users were getting spam messages from their own accounts (same domain/login for example [email protected] to [email protected]). This is preety standard trick and I decided to block it so that anonymous users can't send emails as @company.com. This brought some problems on us like our printers not being able to send emails etc but I solved it with secondary smtp receiver on different port with ip restrictions. However it seems to affect forwarding by some e-mail servers as well: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at home.pl. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : 89.14.1.26 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: Return-Path: Received: from mail.company.com [89.14.1.26] (HELO mail.company.com) by company.ho.pl [79.93.31.43] with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer v0.70) id 488fcb01c2f069d9; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:46:55 +0100 Received: from EXCHANGE1.COMPANY ([fe80::d425:135f:b655:1223]) by EXCHANGE2.COMPANY ([fe80::193f:51ac:9316:cb27%14]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:46:55 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?MadBoy?= So basically server forwards it without affecting email address it was send with and our servers treat it like spam. I used this command to block things: Get-ReceiveConnector "DEFAULT Exchange2" | Get-ADPermission -user "NT AUTHORITY\Anonymous Logon" | where {$_.ExtendedRights -like "ms-exch-smtp-accept-authoritative-domain-sender"} | Remove-ADPermission Is there anyway I can keep on receiveing things like forwards but be able to block things (except some dedicated antispam solution - this will be added later). Also how do I "reassing" back the permissions that was removed? EDIT to clarify: I have a domain domain.com configured as Authorative. Couple of our users are on project for differentcompany.com which is not on our servers or anywhere close. Now when they send an email from their accounts lets say [email protected] to [email protected] that special alias is configured so that any email it receives it forwards to multiple people including a group alias at our domain [email protected] and that group alias puts the email in users mailboxes. After the email is forwarded by [email protected] and it reaches our server it is denied because the forwarding done by the "external" server doesn't affect user information so for the server it seems like the [email protected] was actually sender and it treats it as spam and denies it. The server at differentcompany.com just adds itself to the header that it passed thru it and doesn't modify sender at anyway (seems like this is how forwarding works). Although I could probably allow this particular server as allowed to relay but this would seem to affect more servers/users as anyone can setup forwarding on their email back to our domain...

    Read the article

  • Reverse proxy 502 bad gateway

    - by Brian Graham
    I have setup a subdomain to proxy my plesk panel, but when saving pages I am getting 502 Bad Gateway error instead of a completion message. I am running CentOS 6. Here is my vhost.conf configuration for http://plesk.domain.tld/: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$ RewriteRule $ https://plesk.domain.tld/ [R,L] Here is my vhost_ssl.conf configuration for https://plesk.domain.tld/: SSLProxyEngine On <Location /> ProxyPass https://localhost:8443/ ProxyPassReverse https://localhost:8443/ </Location> I have more than enough (and I have even checked) RAM, CPU and HDD. There are no spikes. As well, the posted information does save, it just errors when trying to show me a "This information has been saved." green/red block. Here is the relevent error from /var/log/nginx/error.log (IP/Host Filtered): 2014/05/29 02:42:41 [error] 8046#0: *402 upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header from upstream, client: 173.238.XX.XX, server: plesk.domain.tld, request: "POST /smb/web/edit HTTP/1.1", upstream: "https://198.100.XX.XX:7081/smb/web/edit", host: "plesk.domain.tld", referrer: "https://plesk.domain.tld/smb/web/edit"

    Read the article

  • Mac Server bizzare routing table

    - by The Unix Janitor
    My mac routing table usually is very simple. I know it's based on bsd , but what's it doing or trying to do. My routing table is usually very simple however, the second one, default was point to link5 ? Is this normal, or is this IPV6 craziness at work? Can somehelp me understand what OSX/BSD is doing? nternet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.1.254 UGSc 22 0 en1 127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 44102 lo0 169.254 link#5 UCS 0 0 en1 192.168.1 link#5 UCS 6 0 en1 192.168.1.1 0:18:39:6d:89:c5 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 739 192.168.1.189 50:ea:d6:86:26:91 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 798 192.168.1.194 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 0 lo0 192.168.1.203 5c:95:ae:dd:34:8d UHLWIi 0 0 en1 316 192.168.1.253 a:76:ff:b5:51:79 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 911 192.168.1.254 8:76:ff:b5:51:79 UHLWIi 32 204 en1 1117 192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWbI 0 7 en1 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 link#1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 UcI lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#1 UHLI lo0 fe80::%en1/64 link#5 UCI en1 fe80::21b:63ff:fec7:c486%en1 0:1b:63:c7:c4:86 UHLI lo0 fe80::223:12ff:fe01:d7fe%en1 0:23:12:1:d7:fe UHLWIi en1 ff01::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff01::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff02::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ----------------------------------- Bizzare routing table here Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default link#5 UCS 113 0 en1 17.72.255.12 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 2 7 en1 1156 64.4.23.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1181 64.4.23.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 64.4.23.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 64.4.23.149 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.150 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1175 64.4.23.151 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.153 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.155 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1181 64.4.23.165 link#5 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 64.4.23.166 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.15 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 65.55.223.16 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 65.55.223.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1199 65.55.223.20 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.23 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 65.55.223.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.32 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.37 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 65.55.223.38 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 69.163.252.33 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 1 9 en1 1181 77.67.32.254 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 111.221.74.13 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1183 111.221.74.15 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.74.16 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.74.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 23 en1 1172 111.221.74.21 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 111.221.74.23 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 111.221.74.24 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1181 111.221.74.26 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 111.221.74.29 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1181 111.221.74.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.74.37 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.74.38 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 111.221.77.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1199 111.221.77.144 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.77.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.77.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.77.154 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 111.221.77.156 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.77.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.77.162 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.77.165 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 40073 lo0 157.55.56.140 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 157.55.56.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.56.143 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.56.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.56.148 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.56.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.56.150 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.56.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 157.55.56.158 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1175 157.55.130.143 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.130.144 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.130.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1181 157.55.130.152 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1199 157.55.130.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 157.55.130.155 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1189 157.55.130.156 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1186 157.55.130.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.130.158 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1172 157.55.130.160 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.130.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1193 157.55.130.166 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.235.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1193 157.55.235.142 link#5 UHLWIi 1 1 en1 157.55.235.144 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 157.55.235.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 157.55.235.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.151 link#5 UHRLWIi 0 36 en1 157.55.235.152 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 157.55.235.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1178 157.55.235.156 link#5 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 157.55.235.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.158 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.235.159 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.235.166 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 25 en1 1181 157.56.52.14 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.56.52.15 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1183 157.56.52.16 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 14 en1 1199 157.56.52.19 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.20 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 17 en1 1199 157.56.52.22 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1181 157.56.52.25 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.28 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.29 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.33 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 169.254 link#5 UC 1 0 en1 169.254.174.250 127.0.0.1 UHS 1 0 lo0 169.254.255.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 2 en1 193.88.6.19 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 194.165.188.82 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 195.46.253.211 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 204.9.163.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1178 213.199.179.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 213.199.179.142 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 213.199.179.146 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1164 213.199.179.148 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.150 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.151 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 213.199.179.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 213.199.179.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1167 213.199.179.160 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.161 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1163 213.199.179.165 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 213.199.179.166 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1164 224.0.0.251 1:0:5e:0:0:fc UHmLWI 0 0 en1 255.255.255.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWbI 0 2 en1 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 link#1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 UcI lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#1 UHLI lo0 fe80::%en1/64 link#5 UCI en1 fe80::21b:63ff:fec7:c486%en1 0:1b:63:c7:c4:87 UHLI lo0 fe80::223:12ff:fe01:d7fe%en1 0:23:12:1:d7:ff UHLWIi en1 ff01::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff01::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff02::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1

    Read the article

  • Server 2008/Windows 7/Samba Unspecified error 80004005

    - by ancillary
    I have a Samba share on a LAN with 2008 PDC/DNS. Smb authenticates with AD and I have several Win7 Machines that can connect fine. I recently added a couple of new computers to the LAN which were imaged the same way (same software, etc.; different hardware so different drivers) as the other machines and they have the same policies set. I can not get the new machines to connect to the samba share no matter what. I am always met with either Unspecified Error 0x80004005 or Network Path not found. I've turned off the firewall; set LANMAN auth to respond to NTLM only/send LM & NTLM responses/use NTLM session security if negotiated in Local Sec Policy SEcurity Options; tried both ip and hostname to connect. SMB log shows that authentication succeeds; but then connection is immediately killed by the client. tcpdump shows nothing remarkable except that when trying to connect from the client via hostname there is an unknown packet type error: ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes) Here's a couple of lines from that error: 11:18:37.964991 IP 001-client.domain.local.49372 > smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn: P 1670:2146(476) ack 201 win 255 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0xABData: (41 bytes) [000] AA 46 96 FA D5 99 33 75 0C C4 20 CE 26 42 F3 61 \252F\226\372\325\2313u \014\304 \316&B\363a [010] F0 8C FB 65 18 17 40 A5 DB 42 BB 94 37 53 92 EC \360\214\373e\030\027@\245 \333B\273\2247S\222\354 [020] 55 98 7F C4 AE 3D 6B 10 C4 U\230\177\304\256=k\020 \304 11:18:37.964998 IP smb.domain.local.netbios-ssn > 001-client.domain.local.49372: . ack 2146 win 100 Here's smb.conf just in case (though don't see how if other machines are working fine): [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN realm = MYDOMAIN.LOCAL server string = domain|smb share interfaces = eth1 security = ADS password server = 192.168.1.3 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log smb ports = 139 strict locking = no load printers = No local master = No domain master = No wins server = 192.168.1.3 wins support = Yes idmap uid = 500-10000000 idmap gid = 500-10000000 winbind separator = + winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes [samba-share1] comment = SMB Share path = /home/share/smb/ valid users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Users" admin users = @"MYDOMAIN+Domain Admins" guest ok = no read only = No create mask = 0765 force directory mode = 0777 Any ideas what else I could try or look for? Or what might be the problem? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Reverse DNS for two ADs in the same subnet

    - by SpacemanSpiff
    I currently have two separate AD forests that exist within the same subnet. The two forests have independent copies of the reverse lookup zone for that subnet. Example: Domain A DC1: 10.1.1.1/24 Domain A DC2: 10.1.1.2/24 Domain A AppServer1:10.1.1.3/24 Domain B DC1: 10.1.1.11/24 Domain B DC2: 10.1.1.12/24 Domain B Appserver1:10.1.1.13/24 What I'm after, is a configuration that allows this reverse zone to be shared between them so that both sets of DNS servers can make updates to the zone. This kind of thing is a little far from my everday work, so a kick in the right direction is a welcome suggestion as well. Decoupling one AD into new segments is a possibility I'm open to but would like to avoid if possible. If there is a DNS related solution I'd prefer that.

    Read the article

  • website is accessible through dns1. but not with WWW

    - by Pushpendra
    i have a domain and i am using freehostia as a web hoster. In the name server of domain i have registered the name of both servers of freehostia. And in my control panel in the hosted domain section its showing "1 Hosted Domains / 1 Domains Listed".however on clicking on that its showing an error that "The selected domain name has not been registered yet. Please register it from the Domain Manager section first" now whenever i am trying to access my website by using dns1. its accessible but when i am using WWW. its not accessible for example my domain name is example.com if i will type dns1.example.com then my webpage will open but when i type www.example.com its showing "Oops! Google Chrome could not find www.example.com" And for information 24 hours has been passed since i have registered my name servers.

    Read the article

  • Where can I find a link to download the SP2 of OES2?

    - by Philippe
    Hi, I have a Netware Novell server with an eDirectory and different objects configured. I implemented an OEServer2 SP1 to emulate a DSfW to manage the eDirectory with AD. I join the domain with the Administrator login and I am logged as the Administrator domain. So far, there are no problems. When I open the MMC window on Windows Server 08 and snap in the "Active Directory Users and Computers" I can see all the OUs and objects presented in the Netware N. server. But, when I select some OUs I can have an error, and when I select other I don’t have this error. Error: “Data from XXXXX is not available from Domain Controller OES2.yyyy.local because: The server is unwilling to process the request. Try again later, or choose another DC by selecting Connect to Domain Controller on the Domain context menu.” With XXXX= OU’s name and yyyy.local= domain name and OES2 server name If somebody can upload this SP or post a link to download it... Thank you for your help!

    Read the article

  • Configure httpd.conf alias/subdirectory point to another server

    - by azrim
    Hi, I,m having a web server for testing purposes to host my domain http://www.domain.com which run perfectly. Below is server specs: OS Freebsd 7.2 MySQL 5.1.33 Apache 2.2.11 PHP 5.2.9 I can do alias directory in my httpd.conf so that my domain can have subdirectory hosting in the same server such as httpd://domain.com/subdomain1, httpd://domain.com/subdomain2 and so on. All my subdomain1 and subdomain2 directory folders reside on the same web server but only different location. Below is my example from httpd.conf for the alias subdomain1 block: Alias /subdomain1 "/usr/local/www/subdomain1" <Directory "/usr/local/www/subdomain1"> Options +Indexes AllowOverride None allow from all </Directory> I,m looking a way in order my subdomain1 and subdomain2 directory is read from another server in my LAN but remain hosted as httpd://domain.com/subdomain1. Really appreciate anyone know how to do this. Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Create and manage child name servers (glue records) within my domain?

    - by basilmir
    Preface I use a top level domain provider that only allows me to add "normal" third-party name servers (a list where i can add "ns1.hostingcompany.com" type entries... nothing else) AND "child name servers" which i can later attach to my parent account ( ns1.myowndomain.com and an ip address). They do not provide other means of linking up. I want to host my own server and dns, even with just one name server (at first). My setup: Airport Extreme - get's a static ip address from my ISP Mac Mini Server - sits behind the Airport and get's a 10.0.1.2 My problem is that i can't seem to configure DNS correctly. I added a "child nameserver" with my airport's external static ip address at the top level provider, so to my understanding i should have all DNS traffic redirected to my Airport. I've opened port 53 UDP to let the traffic in. Now, what i don't get is this. My Mini Server is sitting on a 10.0.1.2 address and i have setup dns correctly, with an A record to point and resolve my server AND a reverse lookup to that 10.0.1.2. So it's ok for "internal stuff". Here is the clicker... How, when a request comes from the exterior for a reverse lookup, does the server "know" ... well look i have everything in 10.0.1.2 but the guy outside needs something from my real address. I can't begin to describe the MX record bonanza... How do i set this "right"? Do i "need" my Mini Server to sit on the external address directly (i can see how this could be the preferred solution, being close to a "real" server i have in my mind). If not... do i need a PTR record on the 10.0.1.2 server but with the external address in there? My dream: I will extend this "setup" with multiple Mini's in different cities where i work. I want a distributed something (Xgrid comes to mind). PS. Be gentle, i've read 2 books and the subject, and bought both the Lynda Essentials and DNS and Networking to boot, still i'm far from being on top of things.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246  | Next Page >