Search Results

Search found 17940 results on 718 pages for 'algorithm design'.

Page 244/718 | < Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >

  • priority queue implementation

    - by davit-datuashvili
    i have implemented priority queue and i am interested if it is correct public class priqueue { private int n,maxsize; int x[]; void swap(int i,int j){ int t=x[i]; x[i]=x[j]; x[j]=t; } public priqueue(int m){ maxsize=m; x=new int [maxsize+1]; n=0; } void insert(int t){ int i,p; x[++n]=t; for (i=n;i>1 && x[p=i/2] >x[i];i=p) swap(p,i); } public int extramin(){ int i,c; int t=x[1]; x[1]=x[n--]; for (i=1;(c=2*i)<=n;i=c){ if (c+1<=n && x[c+1]<x[c]) c++; if (x[i]<=x[c]) break; swap(c,i); } return t; } public void display(){ for (int j=0;j<x.length;j++){ System.out.println(x[j]); } } } public class priorityqueue { public static void main(String[] args) { priqueue pr=new priqueue(12); pr.insert(20); pr.insert(12); pr.insert(22); pr.insert(15); pr.insert(35); pr.insert(17); pr.insert(40); pr.insert(51); pr.insert(26); pr.insert(19); pr.insert(29); pr.insert(23); pr.extramin(); pr.display(); } } //result: 0 12 15 17 20 19 22 40 51 26 35 29 23

    Read the article

  • question about permut-by-sorting

    - by davit-datuashvili
    hi i have following question from book introduction in algorithms second edition there is such problem suppose we have some array A int a[]={1,2,3,4} and we have some random priorities array P={36,3,97,19} we shoud permut array a randomly using this priorities array here is pseudo code P ERMUTE -B Y-S ORTING ( A) 1 n ? length[A] 2 for i ? 1 to n do P[i] = R ANDOM(1, n 3 ) 3 4 sort A, using P as sort keys 5 return A and result will be permuted array B={2, 4, 1, 3}; please help any ideas i have done this code and need aideas how continue import java.util.*; public class Permut { public static void main(String[]args){ Random r=new Random(); int a[]=new int[]{1,2,3,4}; int n=a.length; int b[]=new int[a.length]; int p[]=new int[a.length]; for (int i=0;i<p.length;i++){ p[i]=r.nextInt(n*n*n)+1; } // for (int i=0;i<p.length;i++){ // System.out.println(p[i]); //} } } please help

    Read the article

  • longest increasing subsequent

    - by davit-datuashvili
    i have write this code is it correct? public class subsequent{ public static void main(String[] args){ int a[]=new int[]{0, 8, 4, 12, 2, 10, 6, 14, 1, 9, 5, 13, 3, 11, 7, 15}; int a_b[]=new int[a.length]; a_b[0]=1; int int_max=0; int int_index=0; for (int i=0;i<a.length;i++){ for (int j=0;j<i;j++){ if (a[i]>a[j] && a_b[i]<(a_b[j]+1)){ a_b[i]=a_b[j]+1; } } if (a_b[i]>int_max){ int_max=a_b[i]; int_index=i; } } int k=int_max+1; int list[]=new int[k]; for (int i=int_index;i>0;i--){ if (a_b[i]==k-1){ list[k-1]=a[i]; k=a_b[i]; } } for (int g=0;g<list.length;g++){ System.out.println(list[g]); } } }

    Read the article

  • question about random select

    - by davit-datuashvili
    here is code print number in decreasing order import java.util.*; public class select { public static void Select(int m,int n){ Random r=new Random(); if (m>0) if (r.nextInt(0x3fff8001) % n <m ){ System.out.println(n-1); Select(m-1,n-1); } else{ Select(m,n-1); } } public static void main(String[]args){ int m=35; int n=200; Select(m,n); } } and question is how to changes code such that print number in increasing order? please help

    Read the article

  • [c++/STL] Selective iterator

    - by rubenvb
    FYI: no boost, yes it has this, I want to reinvent the wheel ;) Is there some form of a selective iterator (possible) in C++? What I want is to seperate strings like this: some:word{or other to a form like this: some : word { or other I can do that with two loops and find_first_of(":") and ("{") but this seems (very) inefficient to me. I thought that maybe there would be a way to create/define/write an iterator that would iterate over all these values with for_each. I fear this will have me writing a full-fledged custom way-too-complex iterator class for a std::string. So I thought maybe this would do: std::vector<size_t> list; size_t index = mystring.find(":"); while( index != std::string::npos ) { list.push_back(index); index = mystring.find(":", list.back()); } std::for_each(list.begin(), list.end(), addSpaces(mystring)); This looks messy to me, and I'm quite sure a more elegant way of doing this exists. But I can't think of it. Anyone have a bright idea? Thanks PS: I did not test the code posted, just a quick write-up of what I would try

    Read the article

  • Calculating color shades

    - by matejv
    I have the next problem. I have a base color with couple of different shades of that color. Example: Base color: #4085c5 Shade: #005cb1 Now, I have a different color (let's say #d60620), but no shades of it. From the color I would like to calculate shades, that have similar difference as colors mentioned in first paragraph. First I tried calculating difference of RGB elements and applying them to second color, but the result was not like I expected to be. Than I tried with converting color to HSV, reading saturation value and applying the difference to second color, but again the resulting color was still weird. The formula was something like: (HSV(BaseColor)[S] - HSV(Shade)[S]) + HSV(SecondColor)[H] Does anyone know how this problem could be solved? I know I am doing something wrong, but I don't know what. :)

    Read the article

  • Linear color interpolation?

    - by user146780
    If I have a straight line that mesures from 0 to 1, then I have colorA(255,0,0) at 0 on the line, then at 0.3 I have colorB(20,160,0) then at 1 on the line I have colorC(0,0,0). How could I find the color at 0.7? Thanks

    Read the article

  • fastest way to perform string search in general and in python

    - by Rkz
    My task is to search for a string or a pattern in a list of documents that are very short (say 200 characters long). However, say there are 1 million documents of such time. What is the most efficient way to perform this search?. I was thinking of tokenizing each document and putting the words in hashtable with words as key and document number as value, there by creating a bag of words. Then perform the word search and retrieve the list of documents that contained this word. From what I can see is this operation will take O(n) operations. Is there any other way? may be without using hash-tables?. Also, is there a python library or third party package that can perform efficient searches?

    Read the article

  • programming books [closed]

    - by davit-datuashvili
    I have only one dream -- to buy these two books: Introduction to Algorithms, Third Edition Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science Sorry for my dream, this is a site for posting programming questions, but unfortunately everything happened

    Read the article

  • Merging elements in a scala list

    - by scompt.com
    I'm trying to port the following Java snippet to Scala. It takes a list of MyColor objects and merges all of the ones that are within a delta of each other. It seems like a problem that could be solved elegantly using some of Scala's functional bits. Any tips? List<MyColor> mergedColors = ...; MyColor lastColor = null; for(Color aColor : lotsOfColors) { if(lastColor != null) { if(lastColor.diff(aColor) < delta) { lastColor.merge(aColor); continue; } } lastColor = aColor; mergedColors.add(aColor); }

    Read the article

  • Recursive solution to finding patterns

    - by user2997162
    I was solving a problem on recursion which is to count the total number of consecutive 8's in a number. For example: input: 8801 output: 2 input: 801 output: 0 input: 888 output: 3 input: 88088018 output:4 I am unable to figure out the logic of passing the information to the next recursive call about whether the previous digit was an 8. I do not want the code but I need help with the logic. For an iterative solution, I could have used a flag variable, but in recursion how do I do the work which flag variable does in an iterative solution. Also, it is not a part of any assignment. This just came to my mind because I am trying to practice coding using recursion.

    Read the article

  • Python: Determine whether list of lists contains a defined sequence

    - by duhaime
    I have a list of sublists, and I want to see if any of the integer values from the first sublist plus one are contained in the second sublist. For all such values, I want to see if that value plus one is contained in the third sublist, and so on, proceeding in this fashion across all sublists. If there is a way of proceeding in this fashion from the first sublist to the last sublist, I wish to return True; otherwise I wish to return False. In other words, for each value in sublist one, for each "step" in a "walk" across all sublists read left to right, if that value + n (where n = number of steps taken) is contained in the current sublist, the function should return True; otherwise it should return False. (Sorry for the clumsy phrasing--I'm not sure how to clean up my language without using many more words.) Here's what I wrote. a = [ [1,3],[2,4],[3,5],[6],[7] ] def find_list_traversing_walk(l): for i in l[0]: index_position = 0 first_pass = 1 walking_current_path = 1 while walking_current_path == 1: if first_pass == 1: first_pass = 0 walking_value = i if walking_value+1 in l[index_position + 1]: index_position += 1 walking_value += 1 if index_position+1 == len(l): print "There is a walk across the sublists for initial value ", walking_value - index_position return True else: walking_current_path = 0 return False print find_list_traversing_walk(a) My question is: Have I overlooked something simple here, or will this function return True for all true positives and False for all true negatives? Are there easier ways to accomplish the intended task? I would be grateful for any feedback others can offer!

    Read the article

  • Multiply without multiplication, division and bitwise operators, and no loops. Recursion

    - by lxx22
    public class MultiplyViaRecursion{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println("8 * 9 == " + multiply(8, 9)); System.out.println("6 * 0 == " + multiply(6, 0)); System.out.println("0 * 6 == " + multiply(0, 6)); System.out.println("7 * -6 == " + multiply(7, -6)); } public static int multiply(int x, int y){ int result = 0; if(y > 0) return result = (x + multiply(x, (y-1))); if(y == 0) return result; if(y < 0) return result = -multiply(x, -y); return result; } } My question is very simple and basic, why after each "if" the "return" still cannot pass the compilation, error shows missing return.

    Read the article

  • Why is i-- faster than i++ in loops? [closed]

    - by Afshin Mehrabani
    Possible Duplicate: JavaScript - Are loops really faster in reverse…? I don't know if this question is valid in other languages or not, but I'm asking this specifically for JavaScript. I see in some articles and questions that the fastest loop in JavaScript is something like: for(var i = array.length; i--; ) Also in Sublime Text 2, when you try to write a loop, it suggests: for (var i = Things.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { Things[i] }; I want to know, why is i-- faster than i++ in loops?

    Read the article

  • Sort vector<int>(n) in O(n) time using O(m) space?

    - by Adam
    I have a vector<unsigned int> vec of size n. Each element in vec is in the range [0, m], no duplicates, and I want to sort vec. Is it possible to do better than O(n log n) time if you're allowed to use O(m) space? In the average case m is much larger than n, in the worst case m == n. Ideally I want something O(n). I get the feeling that there's a bucket sort-ish way to do this: unsigned int aux[m]; aux[vec[i]] = i; Somehow extract the permutation and permute vec. I'm stuck on how to do 3. In my application m is on the order of 16k. However this sort is in the inner loops and accounts for a significant portion of my runtime.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >