Search Results

Search found 48020 results on 1921 pages for 'void return'.

Page 249/1921 | < Previous Page | 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256  | Next Page >

  • Redirect to current view on error in asp.net mvc?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I use TempData["message"] which internally uses session.... It works for me but when i do a return RedirectToAction("Create"); my other values are not restored because i am redirecting to Create view... Any suggestion how to retain the values of textboxes in the view..... if (!regrep.registerUser(reg)) { TempData["message"] = string.Format("{0} already exists", reg.EmailId); return RedirectToAction("Create"); } else { return RedirectToAction("Index"); }

    Read the article

  • Delete an object from a tree

    - by mqpasta
    I have a Find function in order to find an element from a BST private Node Find(ref Node n, int e) { if (n == null) return null; if (n.Element == e) return n; if (e > n.Element) return Find(ref n.Right, e); else return Find(ref n.Left, e); } and I use following code in order to get a node and then set this node to null. Node x = bsTree.Find(1); x = null; bsTree.Print(); supposedly, this node should be deleted from Tree as it is set to null but it still exists in tree. I had done this before but this time missing something and no idea what.

    Read the article

  • Serialization of generic types - GWT

    - by sarav
    I have an interface like this public interface IField<T> extends IsSerializable { public String getKey(); public void setKey(String name); public T getValue(); public void setValue(T role); } And a class like this public class FieldImpl<T> implements IField<T> { private String key; public String getKey() { return key; } public void setKey(String key) { this.key = key; } public T getValue() { return value; } public void setValue(T value) { this.value = value; } private T value; public FieldImpl() { } public FieldImpl(String key, T value) { super(); this.key = key; this.value = value; } } When I try to compile I'm getting [ERROR] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; please use a more specific type (reached via server.sdk.model.IField) What is the cause for this? Is there any place I can read about GWT's generics support?

    Read the article

  • VB.Net Linq Datatable Exists

    - by LarsH
    I would like to use Linq instead of below function : Friend Function IsCollectionInTable2(ByVal apps As DataTable, ByVal collectionId As String) As Boolean For Each row As DataRow In apps.Rows If row("CollectionId").ToString = collectionId Then Return True Next Return False End Function The best I can do is below: Friend Function IsCollectionInTable(ByVal apps As DataTable, ByVal collectionId As String) As Boolean Return (From row In apps.AsEnumerable() Where (row.Field(Of String)("CollectionId") = collectionId) Select row.Field(Of String)("CollectionId")).Count > 0 End Function I would like to use Exists or Any in above function. Performance could be an issue,

    Read the article

  • How to efficiently implement a strategy pattern with spring ?

    - by Anth0
    I have a web application developped in J2EE 1.5 with Spring framework. Application contains "dashboards" which are simple pages where a bunch of information are regrouped and where user can modify some status. Managers want me to add a logging system in database for three of theses dashboards. Each dashboard has different information but the log should be traced by date and user's login. What I'd like to do is to implement the Strategy pattern kind of like this : interface DashboardLog { void createLog(String login, Date now); } // Implementation for one dashboard class PrintDashboardLog implements DashboardLog { Integer docId; String status; void createLog(String login, Date now){ // Some code } } class DashboardsManager { DashboardLog logger; String login; Date now; void createLog(){ logger.log(login,now); } } class UpdateDocAction{ DashboardsManager dbManager; void updateSomeField(){ // Some action // Now it's time to log dbManagers.setLogger = new PrintDashboardLog(docId, status); dbManagers.createLog(); } } Is it "correct" (good practice, performance, ...) to do it this way ? Is there a better way ? Note :I did not write basic stuff like constructors and getter/setter.

    Read the article

  • Problems with 'while' loop and 'for' loop when reading through file

    - by David Beckham
    I wasted plenty of hours trying to figure out the problem but no luck. Tried asking the TA at my school, but he was useless. I am a beginner and I know there are a lot of mistakes in it, so it would be great if I can get some detail explanation as well. Anyways, basically what I am trying to do with the following function is: Use while loop to check and see if random_string is in TEXT, if not return NoneType if yes, then use a for loop to read lines from that TEXT and put it in list, l1. then, write an if statement to see if random_string is in l1. if it is, then do some calculations. else read the next line Finally, return the calculations as a whole. TEXT = open('randomfile.txt') def random (TEXT, random_string): while random_string in TEXT: for lines in TEXT: l1=TEXT.readline().rsplit() if random_string in l1: ''' do some calculations ''' else: TEXT.readline() #read next line??? return #calculations return None

    Read the article

  • Concatenate, sort and swap array in Java

    - by sblck
    I am trying to concatenate two arrays into new array, sort in order, and swap two values of index. I'm kind of new to java and only use C before so having a hard time handling an Object. In main method it declares two object arrays IntVector vector = new IntVector(3); and IntVector vector2 = new IntVector(3); I can only do this if the types are int[], but I want to use as an object How should I code the concat, sort, and swap method? public class IntVector { private int[] items_; private int itemCount_; private IntVector(int[] data, int n) { items_ = data.clone(); itemCount_ = n; } public IntVector(int itemSize) { itemCount_ =0; if(itemSize<1) itemSize =10; items_ = new int[itemSize]; } public void push(int value) { if(itemCount_ + 1 >= items_.length) overflow(); items_[itemCount_++] = value; } public void log() { for (int i=0 ; i<itemCount_; ++i) { System.out.print(items_[i]); if(i<itemCount_ -1) System.out.println(); } } public void overflow() { int[] newItems = new int[items_.length * 2]; for(int i=0 ; i<itemCount_; ++i) { newItems[i] = items_[i]; } items_=newItems; } public int getValue(int index) { if(index < 0 || index >= itemCount_) { System.out.println("[error][IntVector][setValue] Incorrect index=" + index); return 0; } return items_[index]; } public void setValue(int index, int value) { if(index < 0 || index >= itemCount_) { System.out.println("[error][IntVector][setValue] Incorrect index=" + index); return ; } items_[index] = value; } public IntVector clone() { return new IntVector(items_, itemCount_); } public IntVector concat() { return null; } public IntVector sort() { return null; } public IntVector swap() { return null; } public static void main(String[] args) { IntVector vector = new IntVector(3); IntVector vector2 = new IntVector(3); vector.push(8); vector.push(200); vector.push(3); vector.push(41); IntVector cloneVector = vector.clone(); vector2.push(110); vector2.push(12); vector2.push(7); vector2.push(141); vector2.push(-32); IntVector concatResult = vector.concat(vector2); IntVector sortResult = concatResult.sort(); IntVector swapResult = sortResult.clone(); //swapResult.swap(1,5); System.out.print("vector : "); vector.log(); System.out.print("\n\ncloneVector : "); cloneVector.log(); System.out.print("\n\nvector2 : "); vector2.log(); System.out.print("\n\nconcatvector : "); concatResult.log(); System.out.print("vector : "); vector.log(); System.out.print("vector : "); vector.log(); } }

    Read the article

  • Save as Ringtone from ContextMenu

    - by kostas_menu
    I have created a button that onClick plays a mp3 file.I have also create a context menu that when you press the button for 2 secs it prompts you to save it as ringtone.How can i save it somewhere in my sd?this is my code: public void onCreate(Bundle icicle) { super.onCreate(icicle); setContentView(R.layout.main); Toast.makeText(a.this, "Touch and listen", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); Button button = (Button) findViewById(R.id.btn1); registerForContextMenu(button); button.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v){ MediaPlayer mp = MediaPlayer.create(a.this, R.raw.myalo); mp.start(); Toast.makeText(a.this, "Eisai sto myalo", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); } }); @Override public void onCreateContextMenu(ContextMenu menu, View v,ContextMenuInfo menuInfo) { super.onCreateContextMenu(menu, v, menuInfo); menu.setHeaderTitle("Save As:"); menu.add(0, v.getId(), 0, "Ringtone"); } @Override public boolean onContextItemSelected(MenuItem item) { if(item.getTitle()=="Ringtone"){function1(item.getItemId());} else {return false;} return true; } public void function1(int id){ Toast.makeText(this, "Ringtone Saved", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); } }

    Read the article

  • What is the purpose of the QAbstractButton::checkStateSet() method?

    - by darkadept
    I'm writing my own 4 state button and I'm not quite sure what to put in the checkStateSet() method, if anything. Here is what I've got so far: SyncDirectionButton::SyncDirectionButton(QWidget *parent) : QAbstractButton(parent) { setCheckable(true); setToolTip(tr("Click to change the sync direction")); _state = NoSync; } void SyncDirectionButton::paintEvent(QPaintEvent *e) { static QPixmapCache::Key noneKey; static QPixmapCache::Key bothKey; static QPixmapCache::Key leftKey; static QPixmapCache::Key rightKey; QPainter p(this); QPixmap pix; if (checkState() == SyncLeft) { if (!QPixmapCache::find(leftKey, &pix)) { pix.load(":/icons/sync-left.png"); leftKey = QPixmapCache::insert(pix); } } else if (checkState() == SyncBoth) { if (!QPixmapCache::find(rightKey, &pix)) { pix.load(":/icons/sync-right.png"); rightKey = QPixmapCache::insert(pix); } } else if (checkState() == SyncRight) { if (!QPixmapCache::find(bothKey, &pix)) { pix.load(":/icons/sync-both.png"); bothKey = QPixmapCache::insert(pix); } } else if (checkState() == NoSync) { if (!QPixmapCache::find(noneKey, &pix)) { pix.load(":/icons/application-exit.png"); noneKey = QPixmapCache::insert(pix); } } p.drawPixmap(0,0,pix); } SyncDirectionButton::DirectionState SyncDirectionButton::checkState() const { return _state; } void SyncDirectionButton::setCheckState(DirectionState state) { setChecked(state != NoSync); if (state != _state) { _state = state; } } QSize SyncDirectionButton::sizeHint() const { return QSize(180,90); } void SyncDirectionButton::checkStateSet() { } void SyncDirectionButton::nextCheckState() { setCheckState((DirectionState)((checkState()+1)%4)); }

    Read the article

  • Overfocus in GridView

    - by chuck258
    I'm trying to implement a GridView that Focuses the next Item and "Overscrolls at the End of a List. E.g. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I want to scroll 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... just by pressing the right Key. Right now I can only Scroll 1 2 3 and then it stops and I have to scroll with the down Key. I already tried to set the focusViews in code (In the getView() method of my ArrayList Adapter, that fills the GridView) view.setId(position); view.setNextFocusLeftId(position-1); view.setNextFocusRightId(position+1); But that doesn't work. I found the boolean *Scroll(int direction) Methods on grepcode But theese are Package Local and I can't overwrite them. Any suggestions on how to solve this. Can I use another View and get the same Layout as a Gridview? I also set a OnFocusChangeListener to see what happens with no reaction. Edit: I just added this to my MainActivity, but now it seems to onKeyDown only get called when the GridView doesn't handle the KeyEvent (If the Last Item in a row is selected). @Override public boolean onKeyDown(int keyCode, KeyEvent event) { switch (keyCode) { case KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT: if (focusedView > 0) { mContainer.setSelection(--focusedView); Log.v("TEST", focusedView+""); } return true; case KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT: if (focusedView < mAdapter.getCount() - 1) { mContainer.setSelection(++focusedView); Log.v("TEST", focusedView+""); } return true; } return super.onKeyDown(keyCode, event); } Edit 2: This is so f***ing stupid but works so damn fine :D @Override public boolean onKeyDown(int keyCode, KeyEvent event) { switch (keyCode) { case KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT: mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_UP, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_UP)); mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT)); mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT)); return true; case KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_RIGHT: mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_DOWN, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_DOWN)); mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT)); mContainer.onKeyDown(KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT, new KeyEvent(KeyEvent.ACTION_DOWN, KeyEvent.KEYCODE_DPAD_LEFT)); return true; } return super.onKeyDown(keyCode, event); } I really don't want to post this as Answer, and I really don't want to have to use this Code because it is such a stupid workaround ;TLDR: Help still needed

    Read the article

  • Redundant code constructs

    - by Diomidis Spinellis
    The most egregiously redundant code construct I often see involves using the code sequence if (condition) return true; else return false; instead of simply writing return (condition); I've seen this beginner error in all sorts of languages: from Pascal and C to PHP and Java. What other such constructs would you flag in a code review?

    Read the article

  • Why does decorating a class break the descriptor protocol, thus preventing staticmethod objects from behaving as expected?

    - by Robru
    I need a little bit of help understanding the subtleties of the descriptor protocol in Python, as it relates specifically to the behavior of staticmethod objects. I'll start with a trivial example, and then iteratively expand it, examining it's behavior at each step: class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" At this point, this behaves as expected, but what's going on here is a bit subtle: When you call Stub.do_things(), you are not invoking do_things directly. Instead, Stub.do_things refers to a staticmethod instance, which has wrapped the function we want up inside it's own descriptor protocol such that you are actually invoking staticmethod.__get__, which first returns the function that we want, and then gets called afterwards. >>> Stub <class __main__.Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub.__dict__['do_things'] <staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Doing things! So far so good. Next, I need to wrap the class in a decorator that will be used to customize class instantiation -- the decorator will determine whether to allow new instantiations or provide cached instances: def deco(cls): def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory @deco class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" Now, naturally this part as-is would be expected to break staticmethods, because the class is now hidden behind it's decorator, ie, Stub not a class at all, but an instance of factory that is able to produce instances of Stub when you call it. Indeed: >>> Stub <function factory at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: 'function' object has no attribute 'do_things' >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! So far I understand what's happening here. My goal is to restore the ability for staticmethods to function as you would expect them to, even though the class is wrapped. As luck would have it, the Python stdlib includes something called functools, which provides some tools just for this purpose, ie, making functions behave more like other functions that they wrap. So I change my decorator to look like this: def deco(cls): @functools.wraps(cls) def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory Now, things start to get interesting: >>> Stub <function Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! Wait.... what? functools copies the staticmethod over to the wrapping function, but it's not callable? Why not? What did I miss here? I was playing around with this for a bit and I actually came up with my own reimplementation of staticmethod that allows it to function in this situation, but I don't really understand why it was necessary or if this is even the best solution to this problem. Here's the complete example: class staticmethod(object): """Make @staticmethods play nice with decorated classes.""" def __init__(self, func): self.func = func def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): """Provide the expected behavior inside decorated classes.""" return self.func(*args, **kwargs) def __get__(self, obj, objtype=None): """Re-implement the standard behavior for undecorated classes.""" return self.func def deco(cls): @functools.wraps(cls) def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory @deco class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" Indeed it works exactly as expected: >>> Stub <function Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <__main__.staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Doing things! >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! What approach would you take to make a staticmethod behave as expected inside a decorated class? Is this the best way? Why doesn't the builtin staticmethod implement __call__ on it's own in order for this to just work without any fuss? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • stack of a c program

    - by ckarthickit
    how the stack would look like for the following program if I give input as 5. #include <stdio.h> int fibonacci(int number) { int retval; if (0 == number){ return 0; } if (1 == number){ return 1; } return(fibonacci(number-1) + fibonacci(number-2)); } int main() { int number = 0; int fibvalue = 1; while (1){ printf("please enter the number\n"); scanf("%d", &number); fibvalue = fibonacci(number); printf("computed fibonacci value %d\n", fibvalue); } return 1; } also give me links where i can learn about it

    Read the article

  • Fragments keep going back to the default position when MapView is Zoomed In/Out

    - by hectichavana
    I have an activity with 3 fragments displayed, a MapActivity, a ListActivity, and a (normal) DetailsActivity. The ListActivity and DetailsActivity is placed over the MapActivity. There's a function to hide both ListActivity and DetailsActivity with an Animation, and onAnimationEnd() I set a new layout for the hidden Activity. The problem I'm facing is, everytime one of the ListActivity or DetailsActivity hidden (picture State 2), and then I pinch the screen on the MapActivity to zoom the map, it always goes back to the default view (picture State 1). The closed Activities are automatically opened again. Does anybody know how to prevent the hidden fragments from going to the first state again when I pinch the MapActivity? this is an example of the function how I hide the DetailsActivity(): public void hideDetailview() { final Animation close = AnimationUtils.loadAnimation(this, R.anim.close); close.setFillEnabled(true); close.setAnimationListener(closeDetailAnimationListener); fragment_detail.startAnimation(close); Toast.makeText(MainFragmentActivity.this,WWHApplication.getDrawer(), Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); } private AnimationListener closeDetailAnimationListener = new AnimationListener() { @Override public void onAnimationStart(Animation animation) { } @Override public void onAnimationRepeat(Animation animation) { } @Override public void onAnimationEnd(Animation animation) { int newLeft = -330; fragment_detail.layout(newLeft, fragment_detail.getTop(), newLeft + fragment_detail.getMeasuredWidth(), fragment_detail.getTop() + fragment_detail.getMeasuredHeight()); } };

    Read the article

  • SQL 2000 - Returning from a Stored Procedure

    - by user70192
    Hello, I'm writing a stored procedure. This procedure has a case where if it is met, I want to stop executing the procedure and return -1. How do I do this? Currently, I'm trying the following: IF @result <> 1 BEGIN SELECT -1 END However, SELECT is not a typical "return". As you can imagine I spend most of my time in code which is why i'm looking for something like a "return". Thank you,

    Read the article

  • Creating parameterized type object using annonymous class

    - by Andrei Fierbinteanu
    This might be a stupid question, but I just saw a question asking how to create a Type variable for a generic type. The consensus seemed to be that you should have a dummy method returning that type, and then use reflection to get it (in this case he wanted Map<String, String>). Something like this : public Map<String, String> dummy() { throw new Error(); } Type mapStringString = Class.forName("ThisClass").getMethod("dummy").getGenericReturnType(); My question is, not having used reflection that much, couldn't you just do something like: Type mapStringString = new ParameterizedType() { public Type getRawType() { return Map.class; } public Type getOwnerType() { return null; } public Type[] getActualTypeArguments() { return new Type[] { String.class, String.class }; } }; Would this work? If not, why not? And what are some of the dangers/problems if it does (besides being able to return some Type like Integer<String> which is obviously not possible.

    Read the article

  • switch statement with returns -- code correctness

    - by houbysoft
    Hi, let's say I have code in C with approximately this structure: switch (something) { case 0: return "blah"; break; case 1: case 4: return "foo"; break; case 2: case 3: return "bar"; break; default: return "foobar"; break; } Now obviously, the "break"s are not necessary for the code to run correctly, but it sort of looks like bad practice if I don't put them there to me. What do you think? Is it fine to remove them? Or would you keep them for increased "correctness"?

    Read the article

  • C# style properties in python

    - by 3D-Grabber
    I am looking for a way to define properties in Python similar to C#, with nested get/set definitions. This is how far I got: #### definition #### def Prop(fcn): f = fcn() return property(f['get'], f['set']) #### test #### class Example(object): @Prop def myattr(): def get(self): return self._value def set(self, value): self._value = value return locals() # <- how to get rid of this? e = Example() e.myattr = 'somevalue' print e.myattr The problem with this is, that it still needs the definition to 'return locals()'. Is there a way to get rid of it? Maybe with a nested decorator?

    Read the article

  • vectorize is indeterminate

    - by telliott99
    I'm trying to vectorize a simple function in numpy and getting inconsistent behavior. I expect my code to return 0 for values < 0.5 and the unchanged value otherwise. Strangely, different runs of the script from the command line yield varying results: sometimes it works correctly, and sometimes I get all 0's. It doesn't matter which of the three lines I use for the case when d <= T. It does seem to be correlated with whether the first value to be returned is 0. Any ideas? Thanks. import numpy as np def my_func(d, T=0.5): if d > T: return d #if d <= T: return 0 else: return 0 #return 0 N = 4 A = np.random.uniform(size=N**2) A.shape = (N,N) print A f = np.vectorize(my_func) print f(A) $ python x.py [[ 0.86913815 0.96833127 0.54539153 0.46184594] [ 0.46550903 0.24645558 0.26988519 0.0959257 ] [ 0.73356391 0.69363161 0.57222389 0.98214089] [ 0.15789303 0.06803493 0.01601389 0.04735725]] [[ 0.86913815 0.96833127 0.54539153 0. ] [ 0. 0. 0. 0. ] [ 0.73356391 0.69363161 0.57222389 0.98214089] [ 0. 0. 0. 0. ]] $ python x.py [[ 0.37127366 0.77935622 0.74392301 0.92626644] [ 0.61639086 0.32584431 0.12345342 0.17392298] [ 0.03679475 0.00536863 0.60936931 0.12761859] [ 0.49091897 0.21261635 0.37063752 0.23578082]] [[0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0]]

    Read the article

  • C++ Pointers to functions.

    - by Andy Leman
    using namespace std; int addition (int a, int b) { return (a+b); } int subtraction (int a, int b) { return (a-b); } int operation (int x, int y, int (*functocall)(int,int)) { int g; g = (*functocall)(x,y); return(g); } int main() { int m,n; int (*minus)(int,int) = subtraction; m = operation (7,5,addition); n = operation (20,m,minus); cout << n; return 0; } Can anybody explain this line for me int (*minus)(int,int) = subtraction; Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • stop form during submission if it validates incorrectly

    - by muqman
    I am trying to use JavaScript to validate forms but if the form doesn't validate, I don't want the form to be sent to the "action" page. The validator: <script> function formSubmit() { document.getElementById("signup_form").submit(); var x=document.forms["signup_form"]["tname"].value; if (x==null || x=="") { alert("First name must be filled out"); return false; } } </script> The form itself: <form action="some_file.php" method="post" id="signup_form" name="signup_form" onsubmit="return formSubmit()"> But all this does is if the tname field empty, it will return an alert but as soon as the user hits ok, the form then redirects to some_file.php. What have I missed here? The submit button: <a href="" onclick="return formSubmit(); return false" class="purplebutton">Signup</a> So what have I missed? How do I avoid this in the future?

    Read the article

  • Why Is It That Generics Constraint Can't Be Casted to Its Derived Type?

    - by Ngu Soon Hui
    It is quite puzzling to find out that Generics Constraint Can't Be Casted to Its Derived Type. Let's say I have the following code: public abstract class BaseClass { public int Version { get { return 1; } } public string FixString { get; set; } public BaseClass() { FixString = "hello"; } public virtual int GetBaseVersion() { return Version; } } public class DeriveClass: BaseClass { public new int Version { get { return 2; } } } And guess what, this method will return a compilation error: public void FreeConversion<T>(T baseClass) { var derivedMe = (DeriveClass)baseClass; } I would have to cast the baseClass to object first before I can cast it to DerivedClass. Seems to me pretty ugly. Why this is so?

    Read the article

  • Java Detect Variable Change Using PropertyChangeSupport and PropertyChangeListener

    - by Sam
    I'm trying to print out debug statements when some third party code changes a variable. For example, consider the following: public final class MysteryClass { private int secretCounter; public synchronized int getCounter() { return secretCounter; } public synchronized void incrementCounter() { secretCounter++; } } public class MyClass { public static void main(String[] args) { MysteryClass mysteryClass = new MysteryClass(); // add code here to detect calls to incrementCounter and print a debug message } I don't have the ability to change the 3rd party MysteryClass, so I thought that I could use PropertyChangeSupport and PropertyChangeListener to detect changes to the secretCounter: public class MyClass implements PropertyChangeListener { private PropertyChangeSupport propertySupport = new PropertyChangeSupport(this); public MyClass() { propertySupport.addPropertyChangeListener(this); } public void propertyChange(PropertyChangeEvent evt) { System.out.println("property changing: " + evt.getPropertyName()); } public static void main(String[] args) { MysteryClass mysteryClass = new MysteryClass(); // do logic which involves increment and getting the value of MysteryClass } } Unfortunately, this did not work and I have no debug messages printed out. Does anyone see what is wrong with my implementation of the PropertyChangeSupport and Listener interfaces? I want to print a debug statement whenever incrementCounter is called or the value of secretCounter changes.

    Read the article

  • Working with Java using methods and arrays [closed]

    - by jordan
    Hi i'm a newb at java and for one of my labs I have to create a instant messenger client with these requirements: add buddyList instance variable add IMClient constructor to create ArrayList addBuddy method removeBuddy method findBuddy method printBuddyList method what's the best way to go about this? so far I have this: public class IMClient { private String userId; // User id private String password; // Password private int status; // Status code for user: 1 - Online, 2 - Off-line, 3 - Away public IMClient(String userId, String password, int status) { super(); this.userId = userId; this.password = password; this.status = status; } // Returns true if password as a parameter matches password instance variable. public boolean checkPassword(String password) { return this.password.equals(password); } public String toString() { StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer(100); buf.append(" User id: "); buf.append(userId); buf.append(" Password: "); buf.append(password); buf.append(" Status: "); buf.append(status); return buf.toString(); } public String getUserId() { return userId; } public void setUserId(String userId) { this.userId = userId; } public String getPassword() { return password; } public void setPassword(String password) { this.password = password; } public int getStatus() { return status; } public void setStatus(int status) { this.status = status; } public static void main(String[] args) { } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256  | Next Page >