Search Results

Search found 9825 results on 393 pages for 'ruby on rails3beta'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 257/393 | < Previous Page | 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264  | Next Page >

  • not unique ids in a route in Rails

    - by Victor P
    In a blog in Rails I want to have paths like http://mydomain.com/posts/28383/comments#21 This is the 21st comment of the 28383th post. The 21 is not an unique id, but the pair 28383, #21 is unique. How can I do this in Rails? Do I have to change the routes? the model? I will be very thankful if you can point me in the right direction Thanks

    Read the article

  • Two Tables Serving as one Model in Rails

    - by matsko
    Is is possible in rails to setup on model which is dependant on a join from two tables? This would mean that for the the model record to be found/updated/destroyed there would need to be both records in both database tables linked together in a join. The model would just be all the columns of both tables wrapped together which may then be used for the forms and so on. This way when the model gets created/updated it is just one form variable hash that gets applied to the model? Is this possible in Rails 2 or 3?

    Read the article

  • Action Mailer: How do I render dynamic data in an email body that is stored in the database?

    - by Brandon Toone
    I have Action Mailer setup to render an email using the body attribute of my Email model (in the database). I want to be able to use erb in the body but I can't figure out how to get it to render in the sent email message. I'm able to get the body as a string with this code # models/user_mailer.rb def custom_email(user, email_id) email = Email.find(email_id) recipients user.email from "Mail It Example <[email protected]>" subject "Hello From Mail It" sent_on Time.now # pulls the email body and passes a string to the template views/user_mailer/customer_email.text.html.erb body :msg => email.body end I came across this article http://rails-nutshell.labs.oreilly.com/ch05.html which says I can use render but I'm only able to get render :text to work and not render :inline # models/user_mailer.rb def custom_email(user, email_id) email = Email.find(email_id) recipients user.email from "Mail It Example <[email protected]>" subject "Hello From Mail It" sent_on Time.now # body :msg => email.body body :msg => (render :text => "Thanks for your order") # renders text and passes as a variable to the template # body :msg => (render :inline => "We shipped <%= Time.now %>") # throws a NoMethodError end

    Read the article

  • Tricky MySQL Query for messaging system in Rails - Please Help

    - by ole_berlin
    Hi, I'm writing a facebook style messaging system for a Rails App and I'm having trouble selecting the Messages for the inbox (with will_paginate). The messages are organized in threads, in the inbox the most recent message of a thread will appear with a link to it's thread. The thread is organized via a parent_id 1-n relationship with itself. So far I'm using something like this: class Message < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :sender, :class_name => 'User', :foreign_key => "sender_id" belongs_to :recipient, :class_name => 'User', :foreign_key => "recipient_id" has_many :children, :class_name => "Message", :foreign_key => "parent_id" belongs_to :thread, :class_name => "Message", :foreign_key => "parent_id" end class MessagesController < ApplicationController def inbox @messages = current_user.received_messages.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page => 10, :order => "created_at DESC" end end That gives me all the messages, but for one thread the thread itself and the most recent message will appear (and not only the most recent message). I can also not use the GROUP BY clause, because for the thread itself (the parent so to say) the parent_id = nil of course. Anyone got an idea on how to solve this in an elegant way? I already thought about adding the parent_id to the parent itself and then group by parent_id, but I'm not sure if that works. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Weird problem cucumber behaving differently when run with the debugger

    - by James
    When I run a cucumber test it executes the code thinking that a collection obtained inside of a controller via a has_many relationship on a model is empty when it isn't. I ran this same test but with the debugger turned and a breakpoint before the collection is used. When I print collection in the debugger at this breakpoint the collection is as it should be (not empty). Then I continue and the test executes as it should. With no debugger and breakpoints though, the test exectues as though the collection is empty. Has anyone had a problem like this/what did you do to fix it?

    Read the article

  • Best way to create a preview functionality in rails

    - by slythic
    Hi all, I'm looking to implement a preview functionality in my posts scaffold. All I need to do is allow a user to enter information in the new view (/posts/new) and then replace the submit button with a preview button. Once the preview button is clicked, the user is routed to the preview page (probably /posts/new/preview). If the user wants to make a change they would click 'go back' or if they are happy with the post they can then submit the post. I found this article (http://eyedeal.team88.org/node/105) but it seems dated. Any ideas on what the best approach for this would be? Many thanks, Tony

    Read the article

  • 'button_to' gives me an ugly URL!

    - by Tyler
    Im trying to get an 'add to cart' button to work. When I use <%= button_to "Add to Cart", :acton = "add_to_cart", :id = @product % and then click the button, I get a URL that puts the action after the ID, like this: 'http://localhost:3000/store/show/1?acton=add_to_cart.' The cart page does not load. What I need is a URL that looks like this: 'http://localhost:3000/store/add_to_cart/1'. I can get that result (and the cart to work) if I don't use 'button_to': <% form_for @product, :url = {:action = "add_to_cart", :id = @product} do |f| % <% end % But, what the heck? Why can't I use 'button_to'?

    Read the article

  • Rails unknown action suddenly everywhere

    - by Joe
    The weird thing is that my app was working perfectly on Sat, and when I check it out on Monday (after doing nothing to it) I kept getting this problem: This behaviour is only happening on my production server. When I try to login or create a new user or do something that interacts with a form I am getting an unknown action error. A simple retrieval of rows does not throw this error however. I don't have all CRUD operations in most of my controllers because it's not necessary - but Rails always looks for the one that doesn't exist - it seams so anyway. If I make a mistake in the form that would normally throw a validation message to the user it will throw this error too, does that mean it has something to do with the model too (I'm not too Rails experienced and didn't know if that would be the case or not)? This is a general error I am getting - I have super_exception_notifier gem installed, so that's what all the extra params are. Processing SessionsController#new (for OMITTED at 2010-04-12 09:11:12) [GET] Rendering template within layouts/application Rendering sessions/new Completed in 3ms (View: 2, DB: 0) | 200 OK [http://OMITTED.com/session/new] Processing SessionsController#show (for OMITTED at 2010-04-12 09:11:14) [GET] ActionController::UnknownAction (No action responded to show. Actions: create, destroy, error_class_status_codes, error_class_status_codes=, error_layout, error_layout=, exception_notifiable_notification_level, exception_notifiable_notification_level=, exception_notifiable_silent_exceptions, exception_notifiable_silent_exceptions=, exception_notifiable_verbose, exception_notifiable_verbose=, http_status_codes, http_status_codes=, and new): dragonfly (0.5.3) lib/dragonfly/middleware.rb:13:in `call' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/rack/request_handler.rb:92:in `process_request' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_request_handler.rb:207:in `main_loop' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:400:in `start_request_handler' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:351:in `handle_spawn_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/utils.rb:184:in `safe_fork' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:349:in `handle_spawn_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:352:in `__send__' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:352:in `main_loop' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:196:in `start_synchronously' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:163:in `start' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/railz/application_spawner.rb:209:in `start' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:262:in `spawn_rails_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:126:in `lookup_or_add' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:256:in `spawn_rails_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:80:in `synchronize' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server_collection.rb:79:in `synchronize' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:255:in `spawn_rails_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:154:in `spawn_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/spawn_manager.rb:287:in `handle_spawn_application' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:352:in `__send__' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:352:in `main_loop' passenger (2.2.9) lib/phusion_passenger/abstract_server.rb:196:in `start_synchronously' This is what one of my forms looks like (nothing special) <% form_tag session_path do -%> <p><%= label_tag 'Username' %><br /> <%= text_field_tag 'login', @login %></p> <p><%= label_tag 'password' %><br/> <%= password_field_tag 'password', nil %></p> <p><%= label_tag 'remember_me', 'Remember me' %> <%= check_box_tag 'remember_me', '1', @remember_me %></p> <p><%= submit_tag 'Log in' %></p> <% end -%> It looks like dragonfly is the culprit doesn't it, here's the section from the gem files it says is being naughty: module Dragonfly class Middleware def initialize(app, dragonfly_app_name) @app = app @dragonfly_app_name = dragonfly_app_name end def call(env) response = endpoint.call(env) if response[0] == 404 13 -->> @app.call(env) else response end end I don't know what goes on behind the scenes here so I probably haven't been looking in the right place to fix this issue. Like I said it only throws this in a production environment, which guess is what the 'env' variable is referencing. Thank you for your time! I've spent nearly my whole day trying to figure this out! :(

    Read the article

  • Rails - eager load the number of associated records, but not the record themselves.

    - by Max Williams
    I have a page that's taking ages to render out. Half of the time (3 seconds) is spent on a .find call which has a bunch of eager-loaded associations. All i actually need is the number of associated records in each case, to display in a table: i don't need the actual records themselves. Is there a way to just eager load the count? Here's a simplified example: @subjects = Subject.find(:all, :include => [:questions]) In my table, for each row (ie each subject) i just show the values of the subject fields and the number of associated questions for each subject. Can i optimise the above find call to suit these requirements? I thought about using a group field but my full call has a few different associations included, with some second-order associations, so i don't think group by will work. @subjects = Subject.find(:all, :include => [{:questions => :tags}, {:quizzes => :tags}], :order => "subjects.name") :tags in this case is a second-order association, via taggings. Here's my associations in case it's not clear what's going on. Subject has_many :questions has_many :quizzes Question belongs_to :subject has_many :taggings has_many :tags, :through => :taggings Quiz belongs_to :subject has_many :taggings has_many :tags, :through => :taggings Grateful for any advice - max

    Read the article

  • Redirecting from an update action to the referrer of the edit

    - by Mark Westling
    My Rails 2.3 application has a User model and the usual controller actions. The edit form can be reached two ways: when a user edits his own profile from the home page, or when an admin user edits someone else's profile from users collection. What I'd like to do is have the update action redirect back to the referred of the edit action, not the update action. If I do a simple redirect_to(:back) within update, it goes back to the edit form -- not good. One solution is to forget entirely about referrers and redirect based on the current_user and the updated user: if they're the same, go back to the home page, else go to the users collection page. This will break if I ever add a third path to the edit form. It's doubtful I'll ever do this but I'd prefer a solution that's not so brittle. Another solution is to store the referrer of edit form in a hidden field and then redirect to this value from inside the update action. This doesn't feel quite right, though I can't explain why. Are there any better approaches? Or, should I stop worrying and go with one of the two I've mentioned?

    Read the article

  • Datamapper In Memory Database

    - by Daniel Ribeiro
    It is easy to setup Datamapper with a Sqlite3 in memory database with: DataMapper.setup :default, 'sqlite3::memory:'. However, when testing, I'd like to destroy the whole in memory database after each test, instead of invoking automigrate! as a shortcut on dropping everything. Is it possible? Or is it enough to set the default repository to nil, and let the garbage collector dispose of it?

    Read the article

  • RoR - howto convert some HTML-elements with css to Rails

    - by NicoJuicy
    I have old HTML code with html and css.. <form action="login" method="post"> <div class="field"> <label for="username">Username</label> <input type="text" class="text" id="username" name="username" value="just click login !"/> </div> <span class="fright"> <button class="button" type="submit"><strong>Log In</strong></button> </span> </div> How can i convert this code to decent rails code? I came up with this, but it ain't right :-( : <% form_for :user, @user, :url => { :action => "login" } do |f| %> <% div_for f, :class => "field text" do %> <%= f.text_field :username %> <%= f.password_field :password, :class => "field text" %> <% end %> <span class="fright"> <%= submit_tag '<strong>Inloggen</strong>', :class => "button",:disable_with => 'verwerken...' %></span> <% end %> I'm having problems with the <strong>Inloggen</strong> And with the <% div_for f, :class => "field text" do %>

    Read the article

  • How do I get save (no exclamation point) semantics in an ActiveRecord transaction?

    - by James A. Rosen
    I have two models: Person and Address which I'd like to create in a transaction. That is, I want to try to create the Person and, if that succeeds, create the related Address. I would like to use save semantics (return true or false) rather than save! semantics (raise an ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid or not). This doesn't work because the user.save doesn't trigger a rollback on the transaction: class Person def save_with_address(address_options = {}) transaction do self.save address = Address.build(address_options) address.person = self address.save end end end (Changing the self.save call to an if self.save block around the rest doesn't help, because the Person save still succeeds even when the Address one fails.) And this doesn't work because it raises the ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid exception out of the transaction block without triggering an ActiveRecord::Rollback: class Person def save_with_address(address_options = {}) transaction do save! address = Address.build(address_options) address.person = self address.save! end end end The Rails documentation specifically warns against catching the ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid inside the transaction block. I guess my first question is: why isn't this transaction block... transacting on both saves?

    Read the article

  • Capistrano 3, Rails 4, database configuration does not specify adapter

    - by Kazmin
    When I start cap production deploy it fails like this: DEBUG [4ee8fa7a] Command: cd /home/deploy/myapp/releases/releases/20131025212110 && (RVM_BIN_PATH=~/.rvm/bin RAILS_ENV= ~/.rvm/bin/myapp_rake assets:precompile ) DEBUG [4ee8fa7a] rake aborted! DEBUG [4ee8fa7a] database configuration does not specify adapter You can see that "RAILS_ENV=" is actually empty and I'm wondering why that might be happening? I assume that this is the reason for the latter error that I don't have a database configuration. The deploy.rb file is below: set :application, 'myapp' set :repo_url, '[email protected]:developer/myapp.git' set :branch, :master set :deploy_to, '/home/deploy/myapp/releases' set :scm, :git set :devpath, "/home/deploy/myapp_development" set :user, "deploy" set :use_sudo, false set :default_env, { rvm_bin_path: '~/.rvm/bin' } set :keep_releases, 5 namespace :deploy do desc 'Restart application' task :restart do on roles(:app), in: :sequence, wait: 5 do # Your restart mechanism here, for example: within release_path do execute " bundle exec thin restart -O -C config/thin/production.yml" end end end after :restart, :clear_cache do on roles(:web), in: :groups, limit: 3, wait: 10 do within release_path do end end end after :finishing, 'deploy:cleanup' end?

    Read the article

  • Unique keys for Sphinx along three vectors instead of two

    - by Brendon Muir
    I'm trying to implement thinking-sphinx across multiple 'sites' hosted under a single rails application. I'm working with the developer of thinking-sphinx to sort through the finer details and am making good progress, but I need help with a maths problem: Usually the formula for making a unique ID in a thinking-sphinx search index is to take the id, multiply it by the total number of models that are searchable, and add the number of the currently indexed model: id * total_models + current_model This works well, but now I also through an entity_id into the mix, so there are three vextors for making this ID unique. Could someone help me figure out the equation to gaurantee that the id's will never collide using these three variables: id, total_models, total_entities The entity ID is an integer. I thought of: id * (total_models + total_entities) + (current_model + current_entity) but that results in collisions. Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

    Read the article

  • How to pre-check checkboxes in formtastic

    - by trustfundbaby
    I have a form I'm trying to set up ... Users can have many posts, and each post can have many people watching it. The Watch model is set up polymorphically as 'watchable' so it can apply to different types of models. It has a user_id, watchable_id, watchable_type and timestamps as attributes/fields. This is soley so that when people comment on a post, users watching the post can get an email about it. What I'm trying to do is show the user a list of users that they can tag on each post, which is not problem. This is what I'm using right now http://pastie.org/940421 The problem with this, is that when you go to edit an update/post ... all the checkboxes are prechecked ... I want it to pre-check only users who are currently watching the post.

    Read the article

  • How did this happen?? Git error? Some other fluke?

    - by marfarma
    Every file in this Rails project is duplicated with a -e and again with a -e-e tacked onto the end of it, like the following. It's that way in my GitHub repository too. But I can't figure out how it happened. Any clue? Google searching comes up empty. -rw-r--r--@ 1 usrname staff 959 Jan 7 02:13 Gemfile -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 958 Jan 5 01:10 Gemfile-e -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 958 Jan 5 01:09 Gemfile-e-e -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 6650 Jan 7 02:13 Gemfile.lock -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 6650 Jan 5 01:10 Gemfile.lock-e -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 6650 Jan 5 01:09 Gemfile.lock-e-e lrwxr-xr-x 1 usrname staff 18 Jan 5 00:37 README.rdoc - doc/README_FOR_APP -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 283 Jan 5 01:10 Rakefile -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 283 Jan 5 01:10 Rakefile-e -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 283 Jan 5 01:09 Rakefile-e-e drwxr-xr-x 6 usrname staff 204 Jan 5 00:37 app drwxr-xr-x 5 usrname staff 170 Jan 5 01:10 autotest drwxr-xr-x 28 usrname staff 952 Jan 5 01:15 config -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 173 Jan 5 01:10 config.ru -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 173 Jan 5 01:10 config.ru-e -rw-r--r-- 1 usrname staff 173 Jan 5 01:09 config.ru-e-e

    Read the article

  • Writing a simple incrementing counter in rails

    - by Trip
    For every Card, I would like to attach a special number to them that increments by one. I assume I can do this all in the controller. def create @card = Card.new(params[:card]) @card.SpecNum = @card.SpecNum ++ ... end Or. I can be blatantly retarded. And maybe the best bet is to add an auto-incremement table to mysql. The problem is the number has to start at a specific number, 1020. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Passing single attributes to associated factories

    - by lambdabutz
    I'm looking for a way to pass fields into the factories of associated models without having to explicitly call the factory itself. For example, lets say I have some factories like so: Factory.define :person do |person| person.name "Default Bob" person.sex "M" person.house {|p| p.association(:house)} end Factory.define :house do |house| house.color "Red" house.has_ac true house.suburb {|h| h.association(:suburb)} end Factory.define :suburb do |suburb| suburb.name "Little boxes" end This is fine and all, but if I want to use factories to create someone in a specific house in a specific suburb I have do this: sub = Factory(:suburb, :name => "Blue town") house = Factory(:house, :color => "Blue", :suburb => sub) person = Factory(:person, :name => "Bill", :house => house) While this isn't bad in this small case, my actual models sometimes have 7 or 8 associations, and when I want to create an object whose associations I only care about a single attribute, the code for this starts to get really heavy. Is there somewhat I can pass attributes to nested Factories without having to recall the Factory itself?

    Read the article

  • How do I initialize attributes when I instantiate objects in Rails?

    - by nfm
    Clients have many Invoices. Invoices have a number attribute that I want to initialize by incrementing the client's previous invoice number. For example: @client = Client.find(1) @client.last_invoice_number > 14 @invoice = @client.invoices.build @invoice.number > 15 I want to get this functionality into my Invoice model, but I'm not sure how to. Here's what I'm imagining the code to be like: class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base ... def initialize(attributes = {}) client = Client.find(attributes[:client_id]) attributes[:number] = client.last_invoice_number + 1 client.update_attributes(:last_invoice_number => client.last_invoice_number + 1) end end However, attributes[:client_id] isn't set when I call @client.invoices.build. How and when is the invoice's client_id initialized, and when can I use it to initialize the invoice's number? Can I get this logic into the model, or will I have to put it in the controller?

    Read the article

  • Erubis block helper throwing error with concat

    - by DEfusion
    I have a couple of block helpers, here's a simple example of what I'm doing: def wrap_foo foo, &block data = capture(&block) content = " <div class=\"foo\" id=\"#{foo}\"> #{data} </div>" concat( content ) end I'm just trying out erubis and it's giving me the following error: You have a nil object when you didn't expect it! You might have expected an instance of Array. The error occurred while evaluating nil.<< Removing the call to concat removes the error but ends up with my wrapper not being rendered Using: Rails 2.3.5 Erubis 2.6.5 And tried this gem that helps Erubis (though 2.6.4) and Rails 2.3 play better together

    Read the article

  • How to build an easy Rails authentication with OpenID and OAuth1.0a-2.0?

    - by Andrei
    Hi, I'am looking for an easy authentication for my users mostly via facebook, but keeping OpenID and other OAuth alternatives as well. For the case if something will go very bad, I will ask my users to optionally provide their email address, which should be obtained via OpenID or OAuth if possible. The same thing is about their name. I am a newbie in Rails, so I started with Railscasts.com #160 (authlogic) and #170 (authlogic and OpenID), however, I had some problems trying to sign in with my Google Account. As I understand, it will take some effort to adjust #170 for my objectives. On the other hand, there is gem authlogic_rpx which will possibly provide me the needed functionality (see http://rails-authlogic-rpx-sample.heroku.com/signin). What would you do? Is it reasonable to put one more step (RPX) in the authentication logic?

    Read the article

  • New Rails deployment half working...not sure why?

    - by Meltemi
    I'm in the final stages of going round trip through the entire Rails cycle: development - test - production (on an external server). I'm very close...but seeing some errors with the production version and don't know enough about Rails' "magic" to troubleshoot it yet... all seems well and I can load my app by going to www.mydomain.com/rails and it seems to work...I can interact with my app and create new objects in my database. However, when I go to www.mydomain.com/rails/ (difference is the trailing slash) i get a webpage that just says "Index from public" on it?!? I don't know where that's coming from? index.html is long removed from public. this may or may not be related to why I can't access, say, the first record in one of my classes by calling its controller like so: www.mydomain.com/rails/mycontroller/1 . and yes, there are records in the database. anyway, something's askew. it works fine on development box. but, only half working on production server. anyone know what might be causing this? this app is running on the server box (not development) Installed Passenger on server to serve app via Apache modified my httpd.conf with Passenger's stuff (headache but finally got it to respond) loaded schema into the production database: rake db:schema:load RAILS_ENV=production

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264  | Next Page >