Search Results

Search found 24391 results on 976 pages for 'static methods'.

Page 257/976 | < Previous Page | 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264  | Next Page >

  • question about quicksort 3 way partition

    - by davit-datuashvili
    i want implement quicksort 3 way partition here is code public class quick3{ public static void quicksort3(int a[],int l,int r){ int k; int v=a[r]; if (r<=l) return; int i=l; int j=r; int p=l-1; int q=r; for (;;) { while (a[++i]<v); while (v<a[--j]) if (j==i) break; if (i>=j) break; swap( a,i, j); if (a[i]==v){ p++; swap(a,p,i);} if (v==a[j]){ q--; swap( a,q,j); } } swap(a,i,r); j=i-1; i=i+1; for (k=1;k<=p;k++,j--) swap(a,k,j); for (k=r-1;k>=q;k--,i++) swap(a,k,i); quicksort3(a,l,j); quicksort3(a,i,r); } public static void main(String[]args){ int a[]=new int[]{4,6,5,9,7,8,3}; quicksort3(a,0,a.length-1); for (int i=0;i<a.length;i++){ System.out.println(a[i]); } } public static void swap(int a[],int i,int j){ int t=a[i]; a[i]=a[j]; a[j]=t; } } after change result is 4 8 7 6 3 5 9 any suggestion?please help

    Read the article

  • Why Enumerable doesn't inherits from IEnumerable<T>

    - by sajjadlove
    Hi All I'm very confused about this issue and can't to underestand it.In the Enumerable Documentation, I readed this: that implement System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable and some methods like Select() return IEnumerable that we can use from other methods like Where() after using that.for example: names.Select(name => name).Where(name => name.Length > 3 ); but Enumerable doesn't inherits from IEnumerable and IEnumerable doesn't contain Select(),Where() and etc too... have i wrong ? or exists any reason for this?

    Read the article

  • Call inner function of jQuery-Plugin-function?

    - by faileN
    Hello Everyone, I've written an jQuery-Plugin, which I want to use as Object. So I declared some functions within the plugin, which I want to call from any other location, just like an object with methods. Is that even possible? To keep it simple: (function( $ ){ $.fn.myPlugin = function(){ // Here I want methods... function foo() { // do something... } } })(jQuery); Then I want to call the inner function from outside the plugin like: $.myPlugin.foo(); But that doesn't seem to work. So is it even possible? Or are there any other solutions? I don't want to use an normal unrelated jQuery-Class for this purpose. Because this plugin should work together with some other jQuery-Plugins. Thank you

    Read the article

  • Is there a TextWriter interface to the System.Diagnostics.Debug class?

    - by John Källén
    I'm often frustrated by the System.Diagnostics.Debug.Write/WriteLine methods. I would like to use the Write/WriteLine methods familiar from the TextWriter class, so I often write Debug.WriteLine("# entries {0} for connection {1}", countOfEntries, connection); which causes a compiler error. I end up writing Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("# entries {0} for connection {1}", countOfEntries, connection)); which is really awkward. Does the CLR have a class deriving from TextWriter that "wraps" System.Debug, or should I roll my own?

    Read the article

  • Xcode method navigation

    - by Bill
    In Xcode 4, I can press Ctrl-6 to get a list of all the methods in the current file. The problem is, if I have private methods declared at the top of my implementation file, say: @interface Foo () -(void)tap:(id)sender; @end @implementation Foo ... -(void)tap:(id)sender { ... } then starting to type "tap" while the method list is visible will just take me to the declaration, since it comes first in the file, when what I really want is the implementation. Is there any way to exclude these declarations from the method list or do I need to resort to separate Foo.h and Foo+Private.h headers? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why Controller doesn't recognize a public method which (yet) appears in the intellisense ?

    - by Richard77
    Hello, I'm using an helper class that I called CreateEditOrganizationService where I put all the helper methods. In my controller, I've createService as object of that class. So far, I've got 5 methods. Now, I've just defined a 6th method called Set_TypeOrganization. I'm getting the Set_TypeOrganization in the intellisense, but after I've chose it, I get the following error: *CreateEditOrganizationService does not contain a definition for Set_TypeOrganization are you missing a directive or a reference?* public List<TypeOrganization> Set_TypeOrganization(string choice) { //Definition goes here... } and in my Controller CreateEditOrganizationService createService = new CreateEditOrganizationService(); //... ViewData["TypeOrganizations"] = createService.Set_TypeOrganization(choice); Unfortunately, VS shows me the error? Yet, the method appear in the intellisense when I type a dot after the createService object. Thannks for helping

    Read the article

  • C# Possible to have a generic return type?

    - by JL
    Here is a typical function that returns either true/false; private static bool hasValue() { return true; } Now on an error, I would like to return my own custom error object with definition: public class Failure { public string failureDateTime { get; set; } public string failureReason { get; set; } } I would have expected to be able to throw this custom object for example... private static bool hasValue() { throw new Failure(); } This is not possible, and I don't want to derive Failure from System.IO.Exception because of the inability to serialize an exception in C#. What is the best practice / or ideal solution to this problem. Should I just work with private static object? Or is there a cleaner way to return a custom object or bypass the typical return type on an error (not using System.IO.Exception)? Not entirely wild about object either, because then I need to cast the result and validate it by more boolean logic.

    Read the article

  • The cross-thread usage of "HttpContext.Current" property and related things

    - by smwikipedia
    I read from < Essential ASP.NET with Examples in C# the following statement: Another useful property to know about is the static Current property of the HttpContext class. This property always points to the current instance of the HttpContext class for the request being serviced. This can be convenient if you are writing helper classes that will be used from pages or other pipeline classes and may need to access the context for whatever reason. By using the static Current property to retrieve the context, you can avoid passing a reference to it to helper classes. For example, the class shown in Listing 4-1 uses the Current property of the context to access the QueryString and print something to the current response buffer. Note that for this static property to be correctly initialized, the caller must be executing on the original request thread, so if you have spawned additional threads to perform work during a request, you must take care to provide access to the context class yourself. I am wondering about the root cause of the bold part, and one thing leads to another, here is my thoughts: We know that a process can have multiple threads. Each of these threads have their own stacks, respectively. These threads also have access to a shared memory area, the heap. The stack then, as I understand it, is kind of where all the context for that thread is stored. For a thread to access something in the heap it must use a pointer, and the pointer is stored on its stack. So when we make some cross-thread calls, we must make sure that all the necessary context info is passed from the caller thread's stack to the callee thread's stack. But I am not quite sure if I made any mistake. Any comments will be deeply appreciated. Thanks. ADD Here the stack is limited to user stack.

    Read the article

  • What is the point declaring variables at the end of class?

    - by serhio
    I saw multiple examples in MSDN that uses to declare the internal fields at the end of the class. What is the point? I find this a little embarrassing, because each time Visual Studio adds a method it adds it to the end of the class, so there is need every time to move it... class A { public A(){} // Methods, Properties, etc ... private string name; } class A { private string name; public A(){} // Methods, Properties, etc ... }

    Read the article

  • Singletons and constants

    - by devoured elysium
    I am making a program which makes use of a couple of constants. At first, each time I needed to use a constant, I'd define it as //C# private static readonly int MyConstant = xxx; //Java private static final int MyConstant = xxx; in the class where I'd need it. After some time, I started to realise that some constants would be needed in more than one class. At this time, I had 3 choises: To define them in the different classes that needed it. This leads to repetition. If by some reason later I need to change one of them, I'd have to check in all classes to replace them everywhere. To define a static class/singleton with all the constants as public. If I needed a constant X in ClassA, ClassB and ClassC, I could just define it in ClassA as public, and then have ClassB and ClassC refer to them. This solution doesn't seem that good to me as it introduces even more dependencies as the classes already have between them. I ended up implementing my code with the second option. Is that the best alternative? I feel I am probably missing some other better alternative. What worries me about using the singleton here is that it is nowhere clear to a user of the class that this class is using the singleton. Maybe I could create a ConstantsClass that held all the constants needed and then I'd pass it in the constructor to the classes that'd need it? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to get just free heap size (not together w stack/method mem) in Java?

    - by Pentium10
    I want to calculate the heap usage for my app. I would like to get a procent value of Heap size only. How do I get the value in code for the current running app? EDIT The upvoted answer is NOT complete/correct. The values returned by those methods include stack and method area too, and I need to monitor only heap size. With that code I got HeapError exception when I reached 43%, so I can't use those methods to monitor just heap.

    Read the article

  • Is there any alternative way of writing this switch statement(C#3.0)

    - by Newbie
    Can it be done in a better way public static EnumFactorType GetFactorEnum(string str) { Standardization e = new Standardization(); switch (str.ToLower()) { case "beta": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.BETA; break; case "bkp": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.BOOK_TO_PRICE; break; case "yld": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.DIVIDEND_YIELD; break; case "growth": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.GROWTH; break; case "mean": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.MARKET_CAP; break; case "momentum": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.MOMENTUM; break; case "size": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.SIZE; break; case "stat_fact1": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.STAT_FACT_1; break; case "stat_fact2": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.STAT_FACT_2; break; case "value": e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.VALUE; break; } return e.FactorType; } If I create a Static class(say Constatant) and declare variable like public static string BETA= "beta"; and then if I try to put that in the Case expression like Case Constants.BETA : e.FactorType = EnumFactorType.BETA; break; then the compiler will report error.(quite expected) So is there any other way?(I canot change the switch statement) Using C#3.0 Thanks

    Read the article

  • How can I write fast colored output to Console?

    - by Statement
    Hello world! I want to learn if there is another (faster) way to output text to the console application window using C# .net than with the simple Write, BackgroundColor and ForegroundColor methods and properties? I learned that each cell has a background color and a foreground color, and I would like to cache/buffer/write faster than using the mentioned methods. Maybe there is some help using the Out buffer, but I don't know how to encode the colors into the stream, if that is where the color data resides. This is for a retrostyle textbased game I am wanting to implement where I make use of the standard colors and ascii characters for laying out the game. Please help :)

    Read the article

  • Which way of declaring a variable is fastest?

    - by ADB
    For a variable used in a function that is called very often and for implementation in J2ME on a blackberry (if that changed something, can you explain)? class X { int i; public void someFunc(int j) { i = 0; while( i < j ){ [...] i++; } } } or class X { static int i; public void someFunc(int j) { i = 0; while( i < j ){ [...] i++; } } } or class X { public void someFunc(int j) { int i = 0; while( i < j ){ [...] i++; } } } I know there is a difference how a static versus non-static class variable is accessed, but I don't know it would affect the speed. I also remember reading somewhere that in-function variables may be accessed faster, but I don't know why and where I read that. Background on the question: some painting function in games are called excessively often and even small difference in access time can affect the overall performance when a variable is used in a largish loop.

    Read the article

  • Java PropertyChangeListener

    - by Laphroaig
    Hi, i'm trying to figure out how to listen a property change on another class. this is my code: class with the property to listen: public class ClassWithProperty { private PropertyChangeSupport changes = new PropertyChangeSupport(this); private int usersOnline; public int getUsersOnline() { return usersOnline; } public ClassWithProperty() { usersOnline = 0; while (usersOnline<10) { changes.firePropertyChange("usersOnline", usersOnline, usersOnline++); } } public void addPropertyChangeListener( PropertyChangeListener l) { changes.addPropertyChangeListener(l); } public void removePropertyChangeListener( PropertyChangeListener l) { changes.removePropertyChangeListener(l); } } class where i need to know when the property change: public class Main { private static ClassWithProperty test; public static void main(String[] args) { test = new ClassWithProperty(); test.addPropertyChangeListener(listen()); } private static PropertyChangeListener listen() { System.out.println(test.getUsersOnline()); return null; } } I have the event fired only the last time (usersOnline=10). Sorry if it can be a stupid question, i'm learning now java and can't find a solution.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to Store Enum value in String?

    - by Narasimham K
    Actally my java progrem like... public class Schedule{ public static enum RepeatType { DAILY, WEEKLY, MONTHLY; } public static enum WeekdayType { MONDAY(Calendar.MONDAY), TUESDAY(Calendar.TUESDAY), WEDNESDAY( Calendar.WEDNESDAY), THURSDAY(Calendar.THURSDAY), FRIDAY( Calendar.FRIDAY), SATURDAY(Calendar.SATURDAY), SUNDAY( Calendar.SUNDAY); private int day; private WeekdayType(int day) { this.day = day; } public static List<Date> generateSchedule(RepeatType repeatType,List<WeekdayType> repeatDays) { ----------------------------- ----------------------------//hear some logic i wrote }//Method } And i'm calling the method into my Business class like following... @RemotingInclude public void createEvent(TimetableVO timetableVO) { if ("repeatDays".equals(timetableVO.getSearchKey())) { List<Date> repeatDaysList=Schedule.generateSchedule(timetableVO.getRepeatType(),timetableVO.getRepeatDays()); } } And Finally TimetableVO is @Entity @Table(name="EC_TIMETABLE") public class TimetableVO extends AbstractVO{ ----- private RepeatType repeatType; private List<WeekdayType> repeatDays;//But in this case the method generateSchedule(-,-) was not calling. ----- } So my Question is Which one is Better Statement in the Following... private List<WeekdayType> repeatDays; (or) private String repeatDays;//if we give like this `How to Convert Enum type to String` because generateSchedule() method taking enum type value....

    Read the article

  • Override existing AS3 classes

    - by purga
    For a custom derived class "Vector2" from flash.geom.Point, when trying to override the clone() method (similar to add(), subtract() methods that will return the type itself), it will always complain about incompatible overriding 'cuz the return type has been altered from "Point" to "Vector2". import flash.geom.Point; public class Vector2 extends Point { //Constructor is good public function Vector2(x:Number = 0, y:Number = 0) { super(x,y); } // Error: Incompatible overriding override public function clone():Vector2 //return type has to be "Point" { return new Vector2(this.x , this.y); } } How can we correctly reuse/override the methods provided by the super classes as supposed to create our own one (e.g. : a new clone1() method), or simply we just can't? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • If I write a framework that gets information from the Internet, should I make a degelate or use blocks?

    - by Time Machine
    Say I'm writing a publicly available framework for the Vimeo API. This framework needs to get information from the Internet. Because this can take some time, I need to use threadin to prevent the UI from hanging. Foundation uses delegates for this, like NSURLConnectionDelegate. However, Game Kit uses blocks as callback functions. What is the recommended way of doing this? I know blocks aren't supported in standard GCC versions, but they require less, much less code for the one that uses my framework. Delegates, on the other hand, are real methods and when protocols are used, I'm sure the methods are implemented. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • C++: How to design a utility class?

    - by Martijn Courteaux
    Hi, The title says it all. But I don't know if I should go for static methods, just a header, a class, or something else? What would be best practice? But, I don't want to have an instance of a utility class. I want to add functions like: Uint32 MapRGB (int r, int g, int b); const char* CopyString(const char* char); // etc. You know: utility methods...

    Read the article

  • Associate two sets of values

    - by PJW
    I have the following code - public static int GetViewLevel(string viewLevelDesc) { try { switch (viewLevelDesc) { case "All": return 0; case "Office": return 10; case "Manager": return 50; default: throw new Exception("Invalid View Level Description"); } } catch (Exception eX) { throw new Exception("Action: GetViewLevel()" + Environment.NewLine + eX.Message); } } public static string GetViewLevelDescription(int viewLevel) { try { switch (viewLevel) { case 0: return "All"; case 10: return "Office"; case 50: return "Manager"; default: throw new Exception("Invalid View Level Description"); } } catch (Exception eX) { throw new Exception("Action: GetViewLevelDescription()" + Environment.NewLine + eX.Message); } } The two static Methods enable me to either get an int ViewLevel from a string ViewLevelDesc or vice versa. I'm sure the way I have done this is far more cumbersome than it needs to be, and I'm looking for some advice how to achieve the same objective but more concisely. The list of int / string pairs will increase significantly. The ones in the above code are just the first three I intend to use.

    Read the article

  • select k th mimimum from array a[0..n-1]

    - by davit-datuashvili
    i have done folloing code from progrmming pearls here is code import java.util.*; public class select { public static int select1(int x[],int l,int u,int k){ //pre l<=k<=u //post x[l..k-1]<=x[k]<=x[k+1..u] Random r=new Random(); int t=r.nextInt(u-1-l)+l; if (l>=u) return -1 ; swap(l,t); int s=x[l]; int i=l; int j=u+1; while (true){ do { i++; }while (i<=u && x[i]<t); do { j--; }while (x[j]>t); if (i>j) break; int temp=x[i]; x[i]=x[j];x[j]=t; swap(l,j); if (j<k){ return select1(x,j+1,u,k); } } return select1(x,l,j-1,k); } public static void main(String[] args) { int x[]=new int[]{4,7,9,3,2,12,13,10,20}; select1(x,0,x.length-1,5); } public static void swap(int i,int j){ int c=i; i=j; j=c; } } but here is mistake Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1 at select.select1(select.java:21) at select.main(select.java:36) Java Result: 1 please help

    Read the article

  • Private vs. Public members in practice (how important is encapsulation?)

    - by Asmor
    One of the biggest advantages of object-oriented programming is encapsulation, and one of the "truths" we've (or, at least, I've) been taught is that members should always be made private and made available via accessor and mutator methods, thus ensuring the ability to verify and validate the changes. I'm curious, though, how important this really is in practice. In particular, if you've got a more complicated member (such as a collection), it can be very tempting to just make it public rather than make a bunch of methods to get the collection's keys, add/remove items from the collection, etc. Do you follow the rule in general? Does your answer change depending on whether it's code written for yourself vs. to be used by others? Are there more subtle reasons I'm missing for this obfuscation?

    Read the article

  • iOS JavaScript bridge

    - by andr111
    I'm working on an app where I'm going to use both HTML5 in UIWebView and native iOS framework together. I know that I can implement communication between JavaScript and Objective-C. Are there any libraries that simplify implementing this communication? I know that there are several libraries to create native iOS apps in HTML5 and javascript (for example AppMobi, PhoneGap), but I'm not sure if there is a library to help create native iOS apps with heavy JavaScript usage. I need to: Execute JS methods from Objective-C Execute Objective-C methods from JS Listen to native JS events from Objective-C (for example DOM ready event)

    Read the article

  • getting duplicate array output - java

    - by dowln
    Hello, Can someone could be kind and help me out here. Thanks in advance... My code below outputs the string as duplicates. I don't want to use Sets or ArrayList. I am using java.util.Random. I am trying to write a code that checks if string has already been randomly outputted and if it does, then it won't display. Where I am going wrong and how do I fix this. public class Worldcountries { private static Random nums = new Random(); private static String[] countries = { "America", "Candada", "Chile", "Argentina" }; public static int Dice() { return (generator.nums.nextInt(6) + 1); } public String randomCounties() { String aTemp = " "; int numOfTimes = Dice(); int dup = 0; for(int i=0 ; i<numOfTimes; i++) { // I think it's in the if statement where I am going wrong. if (!countries[i].equals(countries[i])) { i = i + 1; } else { dup--; } // and maybe here aTemp = aTemp + countries[nums.nextInt(countries.length)]; aTemp = aTemp + ","; } return aTemp; } } So the output I am getting (randomly) is, "America, America, Chile" when it should be "America, Chile".

    Read the article

  • An NSMutableArray that doesn't retain?

    - by synic
    A few UIViewControllers in my app that need to register with a "provider" class in their viewDidLoad methods. I've just been adding them to an NSMutableArray contained in the provider class. However, I don't want this NSMutableArray to keep them from being dealloc'ed, and I also want to have them remove themselves from the NSMutableArray in their dealloc methods. I tried just issuing a [self release] after adding them to the array, and this works, but in order to avoid a crash when they get dealloc'ed, I have to issue a [self retain] right before I remove them. It seems like I'm doing something horribly wrong by retaining an object in it's own dealloc method. Is there a better way to store these values?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264  | Next Page >