Search Results

Search found 46928 results on 1878 pages for 'inner class'.

Page 261/1878 | < Previous Page | 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268  | Next Page >

  • Is the use of union in this matrix class completely safe?

    - by identitycrisisuk
    Unions aren't something I've used that often and after looking at a few other questions on them here it seems like there is almost always some kind of caveat where they might not work. Eg. structs possibly having unexpected padding or endian differences. Came across this in a math library I'm using though and I wondered if it is a totally safe usage. I assume that multidimensional arrays don't have any extra padding and since the type is the same for both definitions they are guaranteed to take up exactly the same amount of memory? template<typename T> class Matrix44T { ... union { T M[16]; T m[4][4]; } m; }; Are there any downsides to this setup? Would the order of definition make any difference to how this works?

    Read the article

  • Is there a name for a pure-data Objective-C class?

    - by BrianEnigma
    This is less of a code-specific question and more of an Objective-C nomenclature question. In C you have struct for pure data. In Enterprise Java, you have "bean" classes that are purely member variables with getters and setters, but no business logic. In Adobe FLEX, you have "Value Objects". In Objective-C, is there a proper name for an object (descended from NSObject, of course) that simply has ivars and getters/setters (or @property/@synthesize, if you want to get fancy) and no real business logic? A more concrete example might be a simple class with getters and setters for filename, file size, description, and assorted other metadata. You could then take a bunch of these and easily throw them into a container (NSDictionary, NSArray) without the need for messy NSValue wrapping of a C struct. It is also a little more structure than putting, say, a bunch of loosely-typed child NSDictionaries into a parent container object.

    Read the article

  • Flex Nested Drag And Drop

    - by Soumitra
    i have a canvas where i can add layout say another canvas.So both the canvas have drag enter and drag drop event . I want to toggle this events .. i.e when outer canvas will accept drag inner will not accept and when inner will accept drag outer will not.I am facing a problem in nested drop events..Inner drop event is not working..Please help me out..Waiting for your help

    Read the article

  • advanced search with mysql

    - by Arsenal
    I'm creating a search function for my website where the user can put in anything he likes in a textfield. It get's matched against anything (name, title, job, car brand, ... you name it) I initially wrote the query with an INNER JOIN on every table that needed to be searched. SELECT column1, column2, ... FROM person INNER JOIN person_car ON ... INNER JOIN car ... This ended up in a query with 6 or 8 INNER JOINs, and a whole lot WHERE ... LIKE '%searchvalue%' Now this query seems to cause a time'out in MySql, and I even got a warning from my hosting provider that the queries just taking up too many resources. Now obviously I'm doing this very wrong, but I was wondering how the correct approach to these kind of search functions is. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to access a php class method using javascript through jquery?

    - by Starx
    I have a js script, which is $("#feedbacksubmit").click(function() { if($("#frmfeedback").valid()) { var tname = $("#name").val(); var temail = $("#email").val(); var tphone = $("#phone").val(); var tcontent = $("#content").val(); var tsend = $(this).attr('ts'); $.post ( "bll/index.php", { action: 'mailfeedback', name: tname, email: temail, phone: tphone, content: tcontent, send: tsend }, function(data) { $('.msgbox').html(data); $("#frmfeedback")[0].reset(); }); return false; } }); however, I am trying to see if there is a way to access the class method of bll/index.php directly from the script, instead of posting parameters, to access it

    Read the article

  • error in fill datagrid whit query

    - by Amir Tavakoli
    i have a data-gride-view and i add my query to this when write my query i catch this error: The schema returned by the new query differs from the base query and this my query: SELECT B.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsDep' AS TableName, B.SettingValue, B.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsDep AS B ON A.SettingKey = B.SettingKey UNION SELECT C.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsMachine' AS TableName, C.SettingValue, C.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsMachine AS C ON A.SettingKey = C.SettingKey UNION SELECT D.SettingKey, 'SysSettings' AS TableName, D.SettingValue, D.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettings AS D ON A.SettingKey = D.SettingKey help me to solve this, tnx

    Read the article

  • Unusual Template Behavior with XSL

    - by bobber205
    Experiencing some very odd behavior with, what should be, a very simple use of XSL and XSLT. Here's a code sample. <xsl:template match="check"> <div class="check"> <xsl:apply-templates mode="check"> <xsl:with-param name="checkName">testVariable</xsl:with-param> </xsl:apple-templates> </div> </xsl:template> The template called above <xsl:template match="option" mode="check"> <xsl:param name="checkName" /> <div class="option"> <input type="checkbox"> </input> <label> testText </label> </div> </xsl:template> Pretty simple right? It should, for each instance of a instance in the XML create a checkbox in a with a hard coded label. However, what I'm getting is <div class="check"></div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="check"></div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> <div class="option>Checkbox stuff here</div> Here's some sample XML <check><option key="1"/><option key="0"/><option key="0"/><option key="0"/><option key="0"/></check> Anyone know what's going on? :D

    Read the article

  • Minor tweak to this javascript function?

    - by RKS
    I have a script that shows/hides used via onClick. I can get it to show/hide just fine, but I can't get it to show/'hide everything else'. So what I get is a bunch of open containers when I really want just the one. Javascript: <script> function showfields(fields){ if(document.getElementById(fields).style.display=='none'){ document.getElementById(fields).style.display='block'; } else{ document.getElementById(fields).style.display = 'none'; } } </script> HTML: <div id="hidden" class="steps" style="display: block;"> <div class="section" style="margin-right: 10px;"> <h2>Something</h2> </div> <button class="continue dropdown" id="showLink" onClick="showfields('hidden2');return false;" href="#">Continue</button> </div> <div id="hidden2" class="steps" style="display: block;"> <div class="section" style="margin-right: 10px;"> <h2>Something2</h2> </div> <button class="continue dropdown" id="showLink" onClick="showfields('hidden3');return false;" href="#">Continue</button> </div> <div id="hidden3" class="steps" style="display: block;"> <div class="section" style="margin-right: 10px;"> <h2>Something3</h2> </div> <button class="continue dropdown" id="showLink" onClick="showfields('hidden3');return false;" href="#">Continue</button> </div> <div id="hidden4" class="steps" style="display: block;"> <div class="section" style="margin-right: 10px;"> <h2>Something4</h2> </div> <button class="continue dropdown" id="showLink" onClick="showfields('hidden4');return false;" href="#">Continue</button> </div> Thanks

    Read the article

  • Chrome + jQuery hide/show inline

    - by Parhs
    Hello I have these things <ul class="ul_std" style="float:right"> <li class="action_buttons" ><a id="button_deleteNormal" class="button_small button_small_red" >??a??af?</a></li> <li class="action_buttons"><a id="button_editCancel" class="button_small" >?????s? ???p?p???s??</a></li> <li class="action_buttons"><a id="button_editNormal" class="button_small" >???p?p???s?</a></li> <li class="action_buttons" style="margin-right:0" ><a id="button_addNormal" class="button_small">???s????</a></li> </ul> The problem is that i hide all of them except the anchor with id = button_addNormal at $(document).ready()... Everything works fine but at chrome when i want to show them ,it displays them as display:inline and not as display:inline-block ... The css class button_small have display:inline-block.... Firefox,IE 6+ works ok... Havent tested on safari but i hope that it would be ok... Why chrome kills inline-block? The solution was to put .css("display","inline-block") instead of .show()

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Show/Hide as Filters to list of divs

    - by deconspray
    Looking to create Javascript that acts like a filter on a list of divs. For instance, here's the intended markup... <a href="#" onclick="">Filter Item 1</a> <a href="#" onclick="">Filter Item 2</a> <a href="#" onclick="">Filter Item 3</a> <a href="#" onclick="">Filter Item 4</a> <a href="#" onclick="">Filter Item 5</a> <div class="1">Item 1</div> <div class="1">Item 1</div> <div class="2">Item 2</div> <div class="3">Item 3</div> <div class="1">Item 1</div> <div class="4">Item 4</div> <div class="4">Item 4</div> <div class="1">Item 1</div> <div class="5">Item 5</div> I want to be able to click on the link for Item 1, and show only Item 1 divs and hide all other divs, click the link of Item 2, and show only Item 2 divs and hide all other divs and so on. I've seen several similar scripts but nothing that seemingly turns divs matching the class on/off in this manner. TIA.

    Read the article

  • Subquery vs Traditional join with WHERE clause?

    - by BradC
    When joining to a subset of a table, any reason to prefer one of these formats over the other? Subquery version: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN (SELECT * FROM Classification WHERE CustomerType = 'Standard') AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID vs the WHERE clause at the end: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN Classification AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps AS s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID WHERE cf.CustomerType = 'Standard' The WHERE clause at the end feels more "traditional", but the first is arguably more clear, especially as the joins get increasingly complex. Only other reason I can think of to prefer the second is that the "SELECT *" on the first might be returning columns that aren't used later (In this case, I'd probably only need to return cf.Code and Cf.SalesRepID)

    Read the article

  • OBject access from different functions in VC++

    - by sijith
    Hi, I have 3 function in my class B. These three function have to access member function of other class A. I did this by creating object of class A in class B constructor and tried to access that object in functions of class B. But its showing error. How can i assess the same object in these three functions. Where i have to create object of class A B::B() { A a; } B:: function() { a.fun(); //fun belongs to class A } B:: function1() { a.fun1(); //fun1 belongs to class A } I am getting error, How can i implement the same where i can access object a in both function.

    Read the article

  • Checking sqlite datetime NULL with RoR

    - by Paul N
    RoR/SQL newbie here. My datetime column 'deleted_at' are all uninitialized. Running this query returns an error: SELECT * FROM variants v ON v.id = ovv0.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv1 ON v.id = ovv1.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv2 ON v.id = ovv2.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv3 ON v.id = ovv3.variant_id INNER JOIN option_values_variants ovv4 ON v.id = ovv4.variant_id WHERE v.deleted_at = NULL AND v.product_id = 1060500595 However, if I set my datetime values to 0, and set my query to v.deleted_at = 0, the correct variant is returned to me. How do I check for uninitialized/NULL datetimes?

    Read the article

  • Encapsulate a set of divs with another div in jQuery

    - by lafoaug
    Hi, I am a little stumped with how to do this. I am using jQuery and wish to encapsulate certain sets of divs with a div. For example I have: <div class="group-1">x</div> <div class="group-1">x</div> <div class="group-2">x</div> <div class="group-2">x</div> <div class="group-3">x</div> And wish to end up with: <div id="set-1"> <div class="group-1">x</div> <div class="group-1">x</div> </div> <div id="set-2"> <div class="group-2">x</div> <div class="group-2">x</div> </div> <div id="set-3"> <div class="group-3">x</div> </div> I am able to cycle through each div and add a div around each one but not the way I want above. Any advice appreciate. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • I want to get the value of an id from a nested div - jquery

    - by Jean
    Hello I want to obtain the .text() of #inner2 <div class="outer" id="outer"> <div id="inner1" class="inner">test1</div> <div id="inner2" class="inner">test2</div> <div id="inner3" class="inner">test3</div> </div> This is the jquery function I am using $('.outer').bind('click',function() { var one = $('#inner'+x).attr('id'); alert(one); }); The problem is the first #id value is show in the alert. Thanks Jean

    Read the article

  • PHP class that changes an image and reloads the page not displaying new image in Internet Explorer

    - by Stuart
    I have a class that runs a function when the image is clicked on to display an additional image. This function produces a linked div tag that reloads the page with a set of variables that then produces another image. The image is set as a background image on a large div tag behind the linked div tags to give the same effect as an image map but without using an image map or a SVG. This works perfectly in Chrome and Firefox but will not display the new image in Internet Explorer until you F5 the page again with the get variables in the URL? Does anyone know how to fix this issue so that it works in IE the same as the other browsers? Many thanks.

    Read the article

  • how to make the two class fields(not referring any other table) as composite key in hibernate?

    - by M Sach
    i want to make pgId and pgName both as composite key where both pgId anf pgName are assgined values. i am not sure how should i go about it? on net i get examples where composite key column refering to column of some other table but not this kind of scenario? @Entity @Table(name = "PersonDetails") public class PersonDetailsData implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Id @Basic private int pgId; @Basic(optional = true) @Column(nullable = true) private int orgId; @Basic(optional = true) @Column(nullable = true) private String pgName; public PersonWikiDetailsData() { } public int getPpId() { return ppId; } public void setPpId(int ppId) { this.ppId = ppId; } public String getSpaceName() { return spaceName; } public void setSpaceName(String spaceName) { this.spaceName = spaceName; } }

    Read the article

  • Help with Jquery and multiple forms on a page.

    - by Will
    I have a several forms that are output from a database on the same page. It works fine when I don't use ajax. When I use Jquery it will only work for the first form. Could anyone point me in the right direction please? Jquery..... $('.updateSubmit').live('click', function() { var id = $('.id').val(); var hardSoft = $('.hardSoft').val(); var brand = $('.brand').val(); var subCat = $('.subCat').val(); var subSubCat = $('.subSubCat').val(); var tProduct = $('.tProduct').val(); var description = $('.description').val(); var quantity = $('.quantity').val(); var price = $('.price').val(); var tCondition = $('.tCondition').val(); var featured = $('.featured').val(); var theData = 'id=' + id + '&hardSoft=' + hardSoft + '&brand=' + brand + '&subCat=' + subCat + '&subSubCat=' + subSubCat + '&tProduct=' + tProduct +'&description=' + description + '&quantity=' + quantity + '&price=' + price + '&tCondition=' + tCondition + '&featured=' + featured; $.ajax ({ type: 'POST', url: '/updateGrab.php', data: theData, success: function(aaa) { $('.'+id).append('<div class="forSuccess">'+aaa+'</div>'); } // end success }); // end ajax return false; }); // end click and my php form...... while ($row = $stmt->fetch()) { echo " <form action='http://www.wbrock.com/updateGrab.php' method='post' name='".$id."'> <input type='hidden' class='id' name='id' value='".$id."' /> Hardware/Software <input type='text' class='hardSoft' name='hardSoft' value='".$hardSoft."' /> Brand <input type='text' class='brand' name='brand' value='".$brand."' /> Sub-category <input type='text' class='subCat' name='subCat' value='".$subCat."' /> Sub-Sub-Cat <input type='text' class='subSubCat' name='subSubCat' value='".$subSubCat."' /> Product <input type='text' class='tProduct' name='tProduct' value='".$tProduct."' /> Description <input type='text' class='description' name='description' value='".$description."' /> Qty <input type='text' class='quantity' name='quantity' value='".$quantity."' /> Price <input type='text' class='price' name='price' value='".$price."' /> Cond <input type='text' class='tCondition' name='tCondition'value='".$tCondition."' /> Featured <input type='text' class='featured' name='featured' value='".$featured."' /> <input type='submit' id='".$id."' class='updateSubmit' name='updateSubmit' value='Update' /> </form> <span class='".$id."'></span> "; // end echo } // end while loop from database This is the first time I've posted here so sorry if its not in the right format. Thanks in advance for the help.

    Read the article

  • will destroyed() be emitted if the constructor of a class derived from QObject throws?

    - by PorkyBrain
    Ive seen Qt GUI syntax like the following all over the place: myDialog::myDialog(QWidget *parent, Qt::WFlags flags):QDialog(parent, flags) { QPushButton *button = new QPushButton("&Download", this); QVBoxLayout *layout = new QVBoxLayout(this); //something that can throw here layout ->addWidget(button ); setLayout(layout); } I've always wondered if this can leak in the event of an exception because the "this" I'm giving as a parent to button and layout is not fully constructed so it might not destroy its children. I tried it out in MSVC2010 Qt4.8.3 and it looks like as soon as the base QObject class is fully created (which is done first of course) it is ok to pass "this" to other objects in the constructor, they will destroyed correctly. I haven't found the spot in the Qt docs guaranteeing this though, can someone point me to it so I have assurance that this will not change in the future?

    Read the article

  • Is there any way static block is executed more than once? if so then how?

    - by learner
    My Understanding Static block is executed during class loading, If a class is already loaded then there is no way to load the class other than class reloading Doubt/Question 1) Is there any time JVM reloads the class? My Understanding In Class Loading JVM loads source of the Java file, so it can not keep all thousands files source is a memory, it should discard the rarely used code and reload again when it is necessary and during reload JVM is not initializing static variables and locks again(may be using some tracking mechanism) Doubt/Question 2) If my above understanding is incorrect then please correct me

    Read the article

  • How to fill in form field, and submit, using javascript?

    - by cannyboy
    If I have an html document whose rough structure is <html> <head> </head> <body class="bodyclass" id="bodyid"> <div class="headerstuff">..stuff...</div> <div class = "body"> <form action="http://example.com/login" id="login_form" method="post"> <div class="form_section">You can login here</div> <div class="form_section"> <input xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="text" id="username" name="session[username_or_email]" tabindex="1" type="text" value="" /> </div> <div class="form_section">etc</div> <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="buttons"> <button type="submit" class="" name="" id="go" tabindex="3">Go</button> <button type="submit" class="" name="cancel" id="cancel" tabindex="4">Cancel</button> </div> </form> </div> </body> </html> You can see that there is a username field and a Go button. How would I, using Javascript, fill in the username and press Go...? I would prefer to use plain JS, rather than a library like jquery.

    Read the article

  • For text-align:right; in TD, why does "style" work and "class" not?

    - by Will Fastie
    If I include this in a table cell: <td style="text-align: right; font-style: italic; color: maroon;">... the contents of the cell are aligned as I expect. If I include the following CSS: .right-notice { text-align: right; font-style: italic; color: maroon; } and this cell: <td class=".right-notice">... the contents of the cell are not right aligned. Why is this? What don't I know? If I change the CSS to replace text-align with float, that works. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Change columns order in bootstrap 3

    - by TNK
    I am trying to change bootstrap columns order in desktop and mobile screen. <div class="container"> <div class="row"> <section class="content-secondary col-sm-4"> <h4>Don't Miss!</h4> <p>Suspendisse et arcu felis, ac gravida turpis. Suspendisse potenti. Ut porta rhoncus ligula, sed fringilla felis feugiat eget. In non purus quis elit iaculis tincidunt. Donec at ultrices est.</p> <p><a class="btn btn-primary pull-right" href="#">Read more <span class="icon fa fa-arrow-circle-right"></span></a></p> <h4>Check it out</h4> <p>Suspendisse et arcu felis, ac gravida turpis. Suspendisse potenti. Ut porta rhoncus ligula, sed fringilla felis feugiat eget. In non purus quis elit iaculis tincidunt. Donec at ultrices est.</p> <p><a class="btn btn-primary pull-right" href="#">Read more <span class="icon fa fa-arrow-circle-right"></span></a></p> <h4>Finally</h4> <p>Suspendisse et arcu felis, ac gravida turpis. Suspendisse potenti. Ut porta rhoncus ligula, sed fringilla felis feugiat eget. In non purus quis elit iaculis tincidunt. Donec at ultrices est.</p> <p><a class="btn btn-primary pull-right" href="#">Read more <span class="icon fa fa-arrow-circle-right"></span></a></p> </section> <section class="content-primary col-sm-8"> <div class="main-content" ........... ........... </div> </section> </div><!-- /.row --> </div><!-- /.container --> View Port = SM columns order should be : |content- secondary | content-primary | View Port < SM columns order should be : | content-primary | |content- secondary | I tried it something like this using 'pulland 'push clases. <div class="row"> <section class="content-secondary col-sm-4 col-sm-push-4"> Content ...... </section> <section class="content-primary col-sm-8 col-sm-pull-8"> Content ...... </section> </div> But this is not working for me. Hope someone will help me out. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • retrieving variables with jquery ajax

    - by vick
    <div class="lead_detail_box_routing"> <div class="lead_detail_box_left">location 1</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_right">Route</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_left">location 2</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_right">Route</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_left">location 3</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_right">Route</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_left">location 4</div> <div class="lead_detail_box_right">Route</div> <div id="results" style="text-align:center;"></div> </div> <!-- end lead_detail and routing--> e.g. when user clicks on "route" I want my jquery-manual-routing.php to get the "3" .. so far I have: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("a#route").click(function() { $("#results").load( "jquery-manual-routing.php", { route_to: ???? } ); return false; }); }); </script> so in my php script, when the user clicks on route next to location 3 I want to be able to grab $_GET['route_to'] =3; Also note that my table already has the class assigned since I am using css to style it The answer will be pure php echo

    Read the article

  • How can I double-enhance a class with cglib?

    - by artemb
    Hi there! Here's the code: Patient patient = factory.createPatient(); Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer(); enhancer.setSuperclass(patient.getClass()); enhancer.setCallback(new DefaultMethodInterceptor(patient)); patient = (Patient) enhancer.create(); assertThat(patient.getFirstName()).isNotNull(); Enhancer enhancer2 = new Enhancer(); enhancer2.setSuperclass(patient.getClass()); enhancer2.setCallback(new DefaultMethodInterceptor(patient)); patient = (Patient) enhancer2.create(); assertThat(patient.getFirstName()).isNotNull(); It fails on the last assert with net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException-->null ... Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException ... Caused by: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Duplicate method name&signature in class file my/package/entity/Patient$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$ca1e6685$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$f52743be I ask this because I want to enhance Hibernate's entities, but sometimes it returns already enhanced ones by itself and my second enhancement fails. How can I avoid this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268  | Next Page >