Search Results

Search found 9826 results on 394 pages for 'ruby on rails2'.

Page 266/394 | < Previous Page | 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273  | Next Page >

  • named route (RESTful) for actions other than index, delete, create, and edit

    - by Hadi
    To illustrate: class Customer has_many :sales_orders end class SalesOrder belongs_to :customer end i want to have customer to list sales_order which is ready to be sent, should i: put the routing http://.../sales_orders/can_be_delivered or create a new controller for reporting http://.../reports/sales_orders_can_be_delivered for the 1st one, what should goes in the route.rb? for the 2nd one, nothing goes in route.rb, we can use the last defined route which is :controller/:action.. <-- but this isn't named route any ideas for this kind of problem?

    Read the article

  • acl9 and devise don't seem to work well together

    - by Nik
    I have a user model which is access controlled by ACL9 in userscontroller: ACL9 related stuff before_filter :load_user, :only = [:show] access_control do allow :owner, :of = :user, :to = [:show] end def load_user user = User.find(params[:id]) end in ApplicaitonController I have a rescue_from 'Acl9::AccessDenied', :with = :access_denied def access_denied authenticate_user! # a method from Devise end it is no problem to type in url for sign in page http://localhost:3000/users/sign_in but it is a problem when for example I type in the user page first, which I am to expect to be redirected to sign in page automatically thru the logic above http://localhost:3000/users/1 #= infinite redirect hell. it tries to redirect back to users/1 again(!?) instead of directing to users/sign_in Does anyone have an opinion as to what might be going wrong? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Adding a computed column to an ActiveRecord query

    - by bmwbzz
    Hi, I am running a query using a scope and some conditions. Something like this: conditions[:offset] = (options[:page].to_i - 1) * PAGE_SIZE unless options[:page].blank? conditions[:limit] = options[:limit] ||= PAGE_SIZE scope = Promo.enabled.active results = scope.all conditions I'd like to add a computed column to the query (at the point when I'm now calling scope.all). Something like this: (ACOS(least(1,COS(0.71106459055501)*COS(-1.2915436464758)*COS(RADIANS(addresses.lat))*COS(RADIANS(addresses.lng))+ COS(0.71106459055501)*SIN(-1.2915436464758)*COS(RADIANS(addresses.lat))*SIN(RADIANS(addresses.lng))+ SIN(0.71106459055501)*SIN(RADIANS(addresses.lat))))*3963.19) as accurate_distance Is there a way to do that without just using find_by_sql and rewriting the whole existing query? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Rails: Easy way to add more than one flash[:notice] at a time.

    - by Josh Pinter
    I thought every time you do a flash[:notice]="Message" it would add it to the array which would then get displayed during the view but the following just keeps the last flash: flash[:notice] = "Message 1" flash[:notice] = "Message 2" Now I realize it's just a simple hash with a key (I think :)) but is there a better way to do multiple flashes than the following: flash[:notice] = "Message 1<br />" flash[:notice] = "Message 2" Thanks. Josh

    Read the article

  • Can not access response.body inside after filter block in Sinatra 1.0

    - by Petr Vostrel
    I'm struggling with a strange issue. According to http://github.com/sinatra/sinatra (secion Filters) a response object is available in after filter blocks in Sinatra 1.0. However the response.status is correctly accessible, I can not see non-empty response.body from my routes inside after filter. I have this rackup file: config.ru require 'app' run TestApp Then Sinatra 1.0.b gem installed using: gem install --pre sinatra And this is my tiny app with a single route: app.rb require 'rubygems' require 'sinatra/base' class TestApp < Sinatra::Base set :root, File.dirname(__FILE__) get '/test' do 'Some response' end after do halt 500 if response.empty? # used 500 just for illustation end end And now, I would like to access the response inside the after filter. When I run this app and access /test URL, I got a 500 response as if the response is empty, but the response clearly is 'Some response'. Along with my request to /test, a separate request to /favicon.ico is issued by the browser and that returns 404 as there is no route nor a static file. But I would expect the 500 status to be returned as the response should be empty. In console, I can see that within the after filter, the response to /favicon.ico is something like 'Not found' and response to /test really is empty even though there is response returned by the route. What do I miss?

    Read the article

  • Enforcing a Uniqueness Constraint in a Nested Form

    - by Euwyn
    I'm trying not to fight the defaults here and use Rails built-in support for nested attributes (from http://ryandaigle.com/articles/2009/2/1/what-s-new-in-edge-rails-nested-attributes). I'm labeling Things with Tags, and all works swell, and for each Thing I have a form with a nested field that creates a new Tag by a name. Trouble is, I need to make sure that each Tag has a unique name. Instead of creating a new Tag, if a user enters the name of one that already exists, I need to create the associate with that pre-existing Tag. How do I do this?

    Read the article

  • Why are my rails tests so slow?

    - by ryeguy
    Is it normal for my test suite to take 5 seconds just to launch? Even when running an empty suite it still takes this long. Is it because it's firing up a new instance of rails on each run? If so, is there anyway to keep it persistent? I'm using Test::Unit with Shoulda.

    Read the article

  • Rails 4, not saving @user.save when registering new user

    - by Yuichi
    When I try to register an user, it does not give me any error but just cannot save the user. I don't have attr_accessible. I'm not sure what I am missing. Please help me. user.rb class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_secure_password validates :email, presence: true, uniqueness: true, format: { with: /\A([^@\s]+)@((?:[-a-z0-9]+\.)+[a-z]{2,})\Z/i } validates :password, presence: true, length: {minimum: 6} validates :nickname, presence: true, uniqueness: true end users_controller.rb class UsersController < ApplicationController def new @user = User.new end def create @user = User.new(user_params) # Not saving @user ... if @user.save flash[:success] = "Successfully registered" redirect_to videos_path else flash[:error] = "Cannot create an user, check the input and try again" render :new end end private def user_params params.require(:user).permit(:email, :password, :nickname) end end Log: Processing by UsersController#create as HTML Parameters: {"utf8"=>"?", "authenticity_token"=>"x5OqMgarqMFj17dVSuA8tVueg1dncS3YtkCfMzMpOUE=", "user"=>{"email"=>"[email protected]", "password"=>"[FILTERED]", "nickname"=>"example"}, "commit"=>"Register"} (0.1ms) begin transaction User Exists (0.2ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM "users" WHERE "users"."email" = '[email protected]' LIMIT 1 User Exists (0.1ms) SELECT 1 AS one FROM "users" WHERE "users"."nickname" = 'example' LIMIT 1 (0.1ms) rollback transaction

    Read the article

  • Haml::SyntaxError in Static#home?

    - by Koning Baard
    I have this Haml: #index-header %h1 Supersonic Mac Software. %p Some motto %h1 Our Software %p Which will once becoume your's .third-column %h2 Product 1 %p LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL .third-column %h2 Product 2 %p LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL .third-column %h2 Product 3 %p LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL And I get this error: Haml::SyntaxError in Static#home Showing app/views/static/home.html.haml where line #5 raised: Illegal nesting: content can't be both given on the same line as %h1 and nested within it. What am I doing wrong? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Rails redirections with new users and logins

    - by Kenji Crosland
    So I'm trying to get the user to return to the page they were looking at before they click "log in" This is what I got in my user application controller: def redirect_back_or_default(default) redirect_to(session[:return_to] || default) session[:return_to] = nil end And this is what I have in my sessions controller: def new @user_session = UserSession.new session[:return_to] = request.referer end end def create @user_session = UserSession.new(params[:user_session]) if @user_session.save flash[:notice] = "Login successful!" redirect_back_or_default(home_path) else render :action => :new end end This works fine most of the time but if a user logs in right after they register to the site, they will get redirected to a blank page. I imagine this is the "create" action because it was the last action before going to user sessions new. So I tried this: def new @user_session = UserSession.new unless request.referer == join_path session[:return_to] = request.referer end end And this tries to take me back to the login page after I log in. What I'd really like to do is have the user see their profile when they log in for the very first time. This wouldn't give me a user id and raised a routing error def create @user_session = UserSession.new(params[:user_session]) if @user_session.save flash[:notice] = "Login successful!" redirect_back_or_default(user_path(current_user)) else render :action => :new end end Anybody gone through these redirecting acrobatics before? I can't seem to get it to work. I'm using authlogic if that helps.

    Read the article

  • Overriding content_type for Rails Paperclip plugin

    - by Fotios
    I think I have a bit of a chicken and egg problem. I would like to set the content_type of a file uploaded via Paperclip. The problem is that the default content_type is only based on extension, but I'd like to base it on another module. I seem to be able to set the content_type with the before_post_process class Upload < ActiveRecord::Base has_attached_file :upload before_post_process :foo def foo logger.debug "Changing content_type" #This works self.upload.instance_write(:content_type,"foobar") # This fails because the file does not actually exist yet self.upload.instance_write(:content_type,file_type(self.upload.path) end # Returns the filetype based on file command (assume it works) def file_type(path) return `file -ib '#{path}'`.split(/;/)[0] end end But...I cannot base the content type on the file because Paperclip doesn't write the file until after_create. And I cannot seem to set the content_type after it has been saved or with the after_create callback (even back in the controller) So I would like to know if I can somehow get access to the actual file object (assume there are no processors doing anything to the original file) before it is saved, so that I can run the file_type command on that. Or is there a way to modify the content_type after the objects have been created.

    Read the article

  • format.js generate 406 Not Acceptable error

    - by Denis
    Hello, following code generate a 406 Not Acceptable error. What can be wrong with my code? def remote_create @photo = Photo.new(params[:photo]) respond_to do |format| if @photo.save # add @photo's thumbnail to last import tag format.js { render :update do |page| page.insert_html :bottom, 'polaroids' , :partial => 'polaroid', :locals => {:photo => @photo} end } else format.html end end end Started POST "/photos/remote_create" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-03-14 14:02:08 Processing by PhotosController#remote_create as HTML Parameters: {"photo"=>{"photo"=>#<File:/var/folders/BT/BTpdsWBkF6myaI-sl3+1NU+++TI/-Tmp-/RackMultipart20100314-285-1y9eq1x-0>, "name"=>"4204497503_a0c43c561d.jpg"}} SQL (0.6ms) INSERT INTO "photos" ("created_at", "filename", "height", "name", "photo_content_type", "photo_file_name", "photo_file_size", "photo_updated_at", "size", "updated_at", "width") VALUES ('2010-03-14 13:02:08.449499', NULL, NULL, '4204497503_a0c43c561d.jpg', 'application/octet-stream', '4204497503_a0c43c561d.jpg', 136710, '2010-03-14 13:02:08.446370', NULL, '2010-03-14 13:02:08.449499', NULL) [paperclip] Saving attachments. [paperclip] saving /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/photos/public/system/photos/224/original/4204497503_a0c43c561d.jpg Completed in 101ms with 406

    Read the article

  • rails named_scope issue with eager loading

    - by Craig
    Two models (Rails 2.3.8): User; username & disabled properties; User has_one :profile Profile; full_name & hidden properties I am trying to create a named_scope that eliminate the disabled=1 and hidden=1 User-Profiles. Moreover, while the User model is usually used in conjunction with the Profile model, I would like the flexibility to be able specify this using the :include = :profile syntax. I have the following User named_scope: named_scope :visible, { :joins => "INNER JOIN profiles ON users.id=profiles.user_id", :conditions => ["users.disabled = ? AND profiles.hidden = ?", false, false] } This works as expected when just reference the User model: >> User.visible.map(&:username).flatten => ["user a", "user b", "user c", "user d"] However, when I attempt to include the Profile model: User.visible(:include=> :profiles).profile.map(&:full_name).flatten I get an error that reads: NoMethodError: undefined method `profile' for #<User:0x1030bc828> Am I able to cross model-collection boundaries in this manner?

    Read the article

  • Controller changes format on variables when publishing

    - by Christoffer
    I am a newbie to ROR but catching on quickly. I have been working on this problem for a couple of hours now and it seems like a bug. I does not make any sense. I have a database with the following migration: class CreateWebsites < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :websites do |t| t.string :name t.integer :estimated_value t.string :webhost t.string :purpose t.string :description t.string :tagline t.string :url t.integer :adsense t.integer :tradedoubler t.integer :affiliator t.integer :adsense_cpm t.boolean :released t.string :empire_type t.string :oldid t.string :old_outlink_policy t.string :old_inlink_policy t.string :old_priority t.string :old_profitability t.integer :priority_id t.integer :project_id t.integer :outlink_policy_id t.integer :inlink_policy_id t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :websites end end I have verified that what is created in the database also is integers, strings etc according to this migration. I have not touched the controller after generating it through scaffold, i.e. it is the standard controller with show, index etc. Now. When I enter data into the database, either through the web form, in rails console or directly in the database - such as www.domain.com for url or 500 for adsense - it will be created in the db without problem. However, when it is being published on the website the variables go completely nuts. Adsense (integer) turns into date, url (string) turns into a float, and so on. This only happens to a few of the variables. This will also create a problem with "argument out of range" since I input 500 and Rails will try to output it as date = crash and "argument out of range". So, how do I fix/trouble shoot this? Why do the formats change? Could it be because of the respond_to in the controller? Cheers, Christoffer

    Read the article

  • Translate RoR Code to Java

    - by mnml
    Hi, for some reasons I am trying to translate the following RoR view code to a Java Groovy view: <% modulo_artists = @artists.length % 3 base = @artists.length / 3 base = base.ceil case modulo_artists when 0 cols = [base, base, base] when 1 cols = [base, base + 1, base] when 2 cols = [base + 1, base, base + 1] end counter = 0 %> <% id_hash = {"0" => "url('/images/actorsbg.png');", "1" => "url('/images/musiciansbg.png');", "2" => "url('/images/artistsbg.png') no-repeat; color: #FFF;", "3" => "url('/images/fashionbg.png')"} %> <div id="artists_<%=params[:artist_cat]%>" style="background: <%= id_hash[params[:artist_cat]] %>;" > <table border="0" width="660" height="164" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr valign="middle"> <% 3.times do |i| %> <td width="220" align="center" style="padding-right: 15px;"> <% cols[i].times do %> <h1><a href="/artists/show/<%= @artists[counter].urlname %>" ><%= @artists[counter].name %></a></h1> <% counter = counter + 1 %> <% end %> </td> <% end %> </tr> </table> </div> This is what I got so far: #{extends 'main.html' /} %{ modulo_artists = artists.size() % 3 base = artists.size() / 3 base = Math.ceil(base) if(modulo_artists == 0) cols = [base, base, base] else if(modulo_artists == 1) cols = [base, base + 1, base] else if(modulo_artists == 2) cols = [base + 1, base, base + 1] endif counter = 0 }% <div id="artists_${artist_cat}" style="background:${id_hash};" > <table border="0" width="660" height="164" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tr valign="middle"> #{list items:1..3, as:'i'} <td width="220" align="center" style="padding-right: 15px;"> #{list items:cols[i]} <h1><a href="@{Artists.show(artists.get(counter).name.replaceAll(" ", "-"))}" >${artists.get(counter).name}</a></h1> %{ counter = counter + 1 }% #{/list} </td> #{/list} </tr> </table> </div> The idea is to keep the items organised in 3 columns like 1|0|1 4|5|4 or 5|4|5 for example

    Read the article

  • Active record taking Date.today as yesterday

    - by Mongus Pong
    I have a strange one.. I am doing something like : tip = find (:first, :conditions => ["last_shown = ? or last_shown is null", Date.today]) And then a little later on I do : tip.last_shown = Date.today tip.save When I look at output of these queries, ActiveRecord is doing the first query with todays date as I would expect. However, the send query, ActiveRecord is setting the last_shown date to be yesterdays date. Why on earth would it do this? I have config.time_zone = 'UTC' in my environment.rb. I can use Time.now.utc.to_date instead of Date.today but it makes no difference.

    Read the article

  • Where to put constants in Rails

    - by Sam
    I have a few constants which are arrays that I don't want to create db's for but I don't know where to store the constants without getting errors. For example CONTAINER_SIZES = [["20 foot"],["40 foot"]] Where can I store this so all models and controller have access to this?

    Read the article

  • map.resource, parameter restrictions

    - by Tiago
    I've a controller :platform here. I'm trying to do something like: /:platform_name/ to redirect to its show, with the parameter. Here is what I've got: map.resource :platform, :as => ':platform_name', :platform_name => /pc|ps2|ps3|wii|ds|psp|xbox-360/ It's working fine. I've other neasted resources to it, and all them are accessing. But. The problem is, I've only those platform names, but when it doesnt fine another route, it aways fall on this. if I try /whatever/, it will look for the *platform_name = whatever*. I was expecting it to fall into the map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' rule. When I did *:platform_name = /pc|ps2|ps3|wii|ds|psp|xbox-360/*, wasnt expected that this rule only apply when the regular expression is fit? how could i restrict this?

    Read the article

  • Multiple remote_form_for on the same page causes duplicate ids

    - by Ben Scheirman
    I've got a rails app that displays a list of items called modules. I'm iterating over these, rendering a partial for each one that includes a remote_form_for call. This all works, but fails HTML validation because my form text fields all have the same id. Is there a :prefix option on the form (or something else) I can use to get around this? Update: (some code) //_module_form.html.erb <% remote_form_for app_module do |f| %> <%= f.label :name %> <%= f.text_field :name %> <%= submit_tag 'Save' %> <%end %> //parent page <% @thing.modules.each do |app_module| %> <%= render :partial => "module_form", :locals => { :app_module => app_module } %> <% end %> So if I have more than 1 item in the collection, I render the identical form on the same page, and the form id and textbox id are duplicated. I can customize the form id pretty easily, but what about the text_box, since the controller is looking for specific named controls?

    Read the article

  • Rails migration won't run, no error thrown

    - by kouak
    Here's a simple migration I'd like to run : class AddTimeOfRevisionToBrandWikis < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up add_column :brand_wikis, :time_of_revision, :datetime end def self.down remove_column :brand_wikis, :time_of_revision end end Here's what I get when I try to run it : $ rake db:migrate (in /Users/kouak/Documents/workspace/wtb) You have 1 pending migrations: 20100404115341 AddTimeOfRevisionToBrandWikis Run "rake db:migrate" to update your database then try again. What's wrong with rake db:migrate ?

    Read the article

  • rails solr search limit total search results / get fixed number of results

    - by kLeos
    I'm trying to perform a search, order the results randomly, and only return a number of results, not all matches. Something like limit(2) I've tried using the Solr param 'rows' but that doesn't seem to do anything: @featured_articles = Article.search do with(:is_featured, true) order_by :random adjust_solr_params do |params| params[:rows] = 2 end end @featured_articles.total should be 2, but it returns more than 2 How can I get a randomized fixed number of results?

    Read the article

  • Mongoid Embeds_many won't save on nested form

    - by Brandon J McKay
    I've got an embeds_many association I'm trying to set up which I've done successfully before, but I'm trying to do it all in one nested form and I can't figure it out. Let's say we have a pocket model: class Pocket include Mongoid::Document field :title, type: String embeds_many :coins, cascade_callbacks: true end and a Coin Model: class Coin include Mongoid::Document field :name, type: String embedded_in :pocket end in my form for the pocket, I'm using: = f.fields_for @pocket.coins do |coin| = coin.text_field :name My controller is the default scaffolded controller. When I use the console, it saves fine and I can see the new pocket and coin I've created. But when I try to create or update a coin from the form, the pocket saves but the coin remains unchanged. What am I missing here?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273  | Next Page >