Search Results

Search found 41789 results on 1672 pages for 'software development'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 285/1672 | < Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >

  • e-library system development

    - by mmcc
    I want to develop an web based library system, and it may feature a "add this book to cart" function, and in its cart page, user can set the book reservation date and click 'Ok' button to finish the reservation process. On the backend side, the admin management page can check that reservation request information. To achieve this function, which way can do so? 1. Asp.net MVC + C# + MSSQL 2. Dotnetnuke (i don't know if this CMS can help) or any idea ?

    Read the article

  • Error starting modern compiler

    - by saloni
    In my servlet , I m using Tomcat 5.0 and JRE is 1.5.0 but it is giving error when I click on the URL . As when I created a war file of my project and deployed in tomcat than it is working fine . It means that only problem with my eclipse configuration ERROR IS : - Apr 5, 2010 3:20:22 PM org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler generateClass SEVERE: Javac exception Error starting modern compiler at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.compilers.Javac13.execute(Javac13.java:69) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.compile(Javac.java:942) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.execute(Javac.java:764) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.generateClass(Compiler.java:382) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:472) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:451) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:439) at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:511) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:292) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:236) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:237) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:157) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:214) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:198) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:152) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:137) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:118) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:929) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:799) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:577) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:683) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.compilers.Javac13.execute(Javac13.java:61) ... 35 more Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: class com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.Target overrides final method . at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClassInternal(WebappClassLoader.java:1634) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClass(WebappClassLoader.java:860) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1307) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1189) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(Unknown Source) at com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile(Main.java:42) ... 40 more --- Nested Exception --- java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.compilers.Javac13.execute(Javac13.java:61) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.compile(Javac.java:942) at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javac.execute(Javac.java:764) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.generateClass(Compiler.java:382) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:472) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:451) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:439) at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:511) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:295) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:292) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:236) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:237) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:157) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:214) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invokeInternal(StandardContextValve.java:198) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:152) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:137) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:118) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:104) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:520) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:929) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:160) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:799) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:705) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:577) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:683) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) Caused by: java.lang.VerifyError: class com.sun.tools.javac.jvm.Target overrides final method . at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClassInternal(WebappClassLoader.java:1634) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClass(WebappClassLoader.java:860) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1307) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1189) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(Unknown Source) at com.sun.tools.javac.Main.compile(Main.java:42) ... 40 more Apr 5, 2010 3:20:22 PM org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler generateClass SEVERE: Env: Compile: javaFileName=/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/work/Catalina/localhost/SampleSaloni//org/apache/jsp/page\form_jsp.java classpath=/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/classes/;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/ant-launcher.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/ant.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-collections-3.1.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-el.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-pool-1.2.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jasper-compiler.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jasper-runtime.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jsp-api.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-common.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-factory.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-java.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-resources.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/tools.jar;D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\work\Catalina\localhost\SampleSaloni;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/classes/;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/ant-launcher.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/ant.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-collections-3.1.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-el.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/commons-pool-1.2.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jasper-compiler.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jasper-runtime.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/jsp-api.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-common.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-factory.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-java.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/naming-resources.jar;/D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/wtpwebapps/SampleSaloni/WEB-INF/lib/tools.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/classes/;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/ant-launcher.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/ant.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/commons-collections-3.1.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/commons-el.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/commons-pool-1.2.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/jasper-compiler.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/jasper-runtime.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/jsp-api.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/naming-common.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/naming-factory.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/naming-java.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/naming-resources.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/servlet-api.jar;D:/software setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/common/lib/tools.jar;/D:/software%20setups/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/bin/bootstrap.jar;/C:/Program%20Files/Java/jre1.5.0_09/lib/ext/dnsns.jar;/C:/Program%20Files/Java/jre1.5.0_09/lib/ext/sunjce_provider.jar;/C:/Program%20Files/Java/jre1.5.0_09/lib/ext/sunpkcs11.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\bin\bootstrap.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\classes cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\ant-launcher.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\ant.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-collections-3.1.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-el.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-pool-1.2.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jasper-compiler.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jasper-runtime.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jsp-api.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-common.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-factory.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-java.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-resources.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\tools.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\work\Catalina\localhost\SampleSaloni cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\classes cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\ant-launcher.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\ant.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-collections-3.1.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-el.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\commons-pool-1.2.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jasper-compiler.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jasper-runtime.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\jsp-api.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-common.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-factory.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-java.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\naming-resources.jar cp=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\wtpwebapps\SampleSaloni\WEB-INF\lib\tools.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\classes cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\ant-launcher.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\ant.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\commons-collections-3.1.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\commons-dbcp-1.2.1.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\commons-el.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\commons-pool-1.2.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\jasper-compiler.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\jasper-runtime.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\jsp-api.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\naming-common.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\naming-factory.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\naming-java.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\naming-resources.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\servlet-api.jar cp=D:\software setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\common\lib\tools.jar cp=D:\software%20setups\jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28\bin\bootstrap.jar cp=C:\Program%20Files\Java\jre1.5.0_09\lib\ext\dnsns.jar cp=C:\Program%20Files\Java\jre1.5.0_09\lib\ext\sunjce_provider.jar cp=C:\Program%20Files\Java\jre1.5.0_09\lib\ext\sunpkcs11.jar work dir=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\work\Catalina\localhost\SampleSaloni extension dir=C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_09\lib\ext srcDir=D:\OffViv\JAVA_IDE\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.wst.server.core\tmp0\work\Catalina\localhost\SampleSaloni include=org/apache/jsp/page/form_jsp.java Apr 5, 2010 3:20:22 PM org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler generateClass SEVERE: Error compiling file: /D:/OffViv/JAVA_IDE/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.wst.server.core/tmp0/work/Catalina/localhost/SampleSaloni//org/apache/jsp/page\form_jsp.java [javac] Compiling 1 source file

    Read the article

  • Craftsmanship is ALL that Matters

    - by Wayne Molina
    Today, I'm going to talk about a touchy subject: the notion of working in a company that doesn't use the prescribed "best practices" in its software development endeavours.  Over the years I have, using a variety of pseudonyms, asked this question on popular programming forums.  Although I always add in some minor variation of the story to avoid suspicion that it's the same person posting, the crux of the tale remains the same: A Programmer’s Tale A junior software developer has just started a new job at an average company, creating average line-of-business applications for internal use (the most typical scenario programmers find themselves in).  This hypothetical newbie has spent a lot of time reading up on the "theory" of software development, devouring books, blogs and screencasts from well-known and respected software developers in the community in order to broaden his knowledge and "do what the pros do".  He begins his new job, eager to apply what he's learned on a real-world project only to discover that his new teammates doesn't use any of those concepts and techniques.  They hack their way through development, or in a best-case scenario use some homebrew, thrown-together semblance of a framework for their applications that follows not one of the best practices suggested by the “elite” in the software community - things like TDD (TDD as a "best practice" is the only subjective part of this post, but it's included here due to a very large following of respected developers who consider it one), the SOLID principles, well-known and venerable tools, even version control in a worst case and truly nightmarish scenario.  Our protagonist is frustrated that he isn't doing things the "proper" way - a way he's spent personal time digesting and learning about and, more importantly, a way that some of the top developers in the industry advocate - and turns to a forum to ask the advice of his peers. Invariably the answer I, in the guise of the concerned newbie, will receive is that A) I don't know anything and should just shut my mouth and sling code the bad way like everybody else on the team, and B) These "best practices" are fade or a joke, and the only thing that matters is shipping software to your customers. I am here today to say that anyone who says this, or anything like it, is not only full of crap but indicative of exactly the type of “developer” that has helped to give our industry a bad name.  Here is why: One Who Knows Nothing, Understands Nothing On one hand, you have the cognoscenti of the .NET development world.  Guys like James Avery, Jeremy Miller, Ayende Rahien and Rob Conery; all well-respected and noted programmers that are pretty much our version of celebrities.  These guys write blogs, books, and post videos outlining the "correct" way of writing software to make sure it not only works but is maintainable and extensible and a joy to work with.  They tout the virtues of the SOLID principles, or of using TDD/BDD, or using a mature ORM like NHibernate, Subsonic or even Entity Framework. On the other hand, you have Joe Everyman, Lead Software Developer at Initrode Corporation - in our hypothetical story Joe is the junior developer's new boss.  Joe's been with Initrode for 10 years, starting as the company’s very first programmer and over the years building up a little fiefdom of his own until at the present he’s in charge of all Initrode’s software development.  Joe writes code the same way he always has, without bothering to learn much, if anything.  He looked at NHibernate once and found it was "too hard", so he uses a primitive implementation of the TableDataGateway pattern as a wrapper around SqlClient.SqlConnection and SqlClient.SqlCommand instead of an actual ORM (or, in a better case scenario, has created his own ORM); the thought of using LINQ or Entity Framework or really anything other than his own hastily homebrew solution has never occurred to him.  He doesn't understand TDD and considers “testing” to be using the .NET debugger to step through code, or simply loading up an app and entering some values to see if it works.  He doesn't really understand SOLID, and he doesn't care to.  He's worked as a programmer for years, and that's all that counts.  Right?  WRONG. Who would you rather trust?  Someone with years of experience and who writes books, creates well-known software and is akin to a celebrity, or someone with no credibility outside their own minute environment who throws around their clout and company seniority as the "proof" of their ability?  Joe Everyman may have years of experience at Initrode as a programmer, and says to do things "his way" but someone like Jeremy Miller or Ayende Rahien have years of experience at companies just like Initrode, THEY know ten times more than Joe Everyman knows or could ever hope to know, and THEY say to do things "this way". Here's another way of thinking about it: If you wanted to get into politics and needed advice on the best way to do it, would you rather listen to the mayor of Hicktown, USA or Barack Obama?  One is a small-time nobody while the other is very well-known and, as such, would probably have much more accurate and beneficial advice. NOTE: The selection of Barack Obama as an example in no way, shape, or form suggests a political affiliation or political bent to this post or blog, and no political innuendo should be mistakenly read from it; the intent was merely to compare a small-time persona with a well-known persona in a non-software field.  Feel free to replace the name "Barack Obama" with any well-known Congressman, Senator or US President of your choice. DIY Considered Harmful I will say right now that the homebrew development environment is the WORST one for an aspiring programmer, because it relies on nothing outside it's own little box - no useful skill outside of the small pond.  If you are forced to use some half-baked, homebrew ORM created by your Director of Software, you are not learning anything valuable you can take with you in the future; now, if you plan to stay at Initrode for 10 years like Joe Everyman, this is fine and dandy.  However if, like most of us, you want to advance your career outside a very narrow space you will do more harm than good by sticking it out in an environment where you, to be frank, know better than everybody else because you are aware of alternative and, in almost most cases, better tools for the job.  A junior developer who understands why the SOLID principles are good to follow, or why TDD is beneficial, or who knows that it's better to use NHibernate/Subsonic/EF/LINQ/well-known ORM versus some in-house one knows better than a senior developer with 20 years experience who doesn't understand any of that, plain and simple.  Anyone who disagrees is either a liar, or someone who, just like Joe Everyman, Lead Developer, relies on seniority and tenure rather than adapting their knowledge as things evolve. In many cases, the Joe Everymans of the world act this way out of fear - they cannot possibly fathom that a “junior” could know more than them; after all, they’ve spent 10 or more years in the same company, doing the same job, cranking out the same shoddy software.  And here comes a newbie who hasn’t spent 10+ years doing the same things, with a fresh and often radical take on the craft, and Joe Everyman is afraid he might have to put some real effort into his career again instead of just pointing to his 10 years of service at Initrode as “proof” that he’s good, or that he might have to learn something new to improve; in most cases the problem is Joe Everyman, and by extension Initrode itself, has a mentality of just being “good enough”, and mediocrity is the rule of the day. A Thorn Bush is No Place for a Phoenix My advice is that if you work on a team where they don't use the best practices that some of the most famous developers in our field say is the "right" way to do things (and have legions of people who agree), and YOU are aware of these practices and can see why they work, then LEAVE the company.  Find a company where they DO care about quality, and craftsmanship, otherwise you will never be happy.  There is no point in "dumbing" yourself down to the level of your co-workers and slinging code without care to craftsmanship.  In 95% of these situations there will be no point in bringing it to the attention of Joe Everyman because he won't listen; he might even get upset that someone is trying to "upstage" him and fire the newbie, and replace someone with loads of untapped potential with a drone that will just nod affirmatively and grind out the tasks assigned without question. Find a company that has people smart enough to listen to the "best and brightest", and be happy.  Do not, I repeat, DO NOT waste away in a job working for ignorant people.  At the end of the day software development IS a craft, and a level of craftsmanship is REQUIRED for any serious professional.  When you have knowledgeable people with the credibility to back it up saying one thing, and small-time people who are, to put it bluntly, nobodies in the field saying and doing something totally different because they can't comprehend it, leave the nobodies to their own devices to fade into obscurity.  Work for a company that uses REAL software engineering techniques and really cares about craftsmanship.  The biggest issue affecting our career, and the reason software development has never been the respected, white-collar career it was meant to be, is because hacks and charlatans can pass themselves off as professional programmers without following a lick of good advice from programmers much better at the craft than they are.  These modern day snake-oil salesmen entrench themselves in companies by hoodwinking non-technical businesspeople and customers with their shoddy wares, end up in senior/lead/executive positions, and push their lack of knowledge on everybody unfortunate enough to work with/for/under them, crushing any dissent or voices of reason and change under their tyrannical heel and leaving behind a trail of dismayed and, often, unemployed junior developers who were made examples of to keep up the facade and avoid the shadow of doubt being cast upon them. To sum this up another way: If you surround yourself with learned people, you will learn.  Surround yourself with ignorant people who can't, as the saying goes, see the forest through the trees, and you'll learn nothing of any real value.  There is more to software development than just writing code, and the end goal should not be just "shipping software", it should be shipping software that is extensible, maintainable, and above all else software whose creation has broadened your knowledge in some capacity, even if a minor one.  An eager newbie who knows theory and thirsts for knowledge can easily be moulded and taught the advanced topics, but the same can't be said of someone who only cares about the finish line.  This industry needs more people espousing the benefits of software craftsmanship and proper software engineering techniques, and less Joe Everymans who are unwilling to adapt or foster new ways of thinking. Conclusion - I Cast “Protection from Fire” I am fairly certain this post will spark some controversy and might even invite the flames.  Please keep in mind these are opinions and nothing more.  A little healthy rant and subsequent flamewar can be good for the soul once in a while.  To paraphrase The Godfather: It helps to get rid of the bad blood.

    Read the article

  • What would you do to improve the working of a small Development team?

    - by Omar Kooheji
    My company is having a reshuffle and I'm applying for my boss' job as he's moved up the ladder. The new role would give me a chance to move our development team into the 21st century and I'd like to make sure that: I can provide sensible suggestions in the interview to get the job so I can fix the team If I get the job I can actually enact some changes to actually improve the lives of the developers and their output. I want to know what I can suggest to improve the way we work, because I think it's a mess but every time I've suggested a change it's been shot down because any time spend implementing the change would be time that isn't spent developing software. Here is the state of play at the moment: My team consists of 3-4 developers (Mainly Java but I do some .Net work) Each member of the team is usually works on 2-3 projects at a time We are each responsible for the entire life cycle of the project from design to testing. Usually only one person works on a project (Although we have the odd project that will have more than one person working on it.) Projects tend to be bespoke to single customer, or are really heavilly reliant on a particular customer environment. We have 2-3 "Products" which we evolve to meet customer requirements. We use SVN for source control We don't do continuous integration (I'd like to start) We use a really basic bug tracker for internal issue tracking (I'd like to move to an issue/task management system) Any changes that bring a sudden dip in revenue generation will probably be rejected, the company isn't structured for development most of the rest of the technical team's jobs can be broken down to install this piece of hardware, configure that piece of hardware and once a job is done it's done and you never have to look at it again. This mentality has crept into development team because it's part of the company culture.

    Read the article

  • How common is prototyping as the first stage of development?

    - by EpsilonVector
    I've been taking some software design courses in the past few semesters, and while I see the benefit in a lot of the formalism, I feel like it doesn't tell me anything about the program itself: You can't tell how the program is going to operate from the Use Case spec, even though it discusses what the program can do. You can't tell anything about the user experience from the requirements document, even though it can include quality requirements. Sequence diagrams are a good description of how the software works as the call stack, but are very limited, and give a highly partial view of the overall system. Class diagrams are great for describing how the system is built, but are utterly useless in helping you figure out what the software needs to be. Where in all this formalism is the bottom line: how the program looks, operates, and what experience it gives? Doesn't it make more sense to design off of that? Isn't it better to figure out how the program should work via a prototype and strive to implement it for real? I know that I'm probably suffering from being taught engineering by theoreticians, but I need to ask, do they do this in the industry? How do people figure out what the program actually is, not what it should conform to? Do people prototype a lot, or do they mostly use the formal tools like UML and I just didn't get the hang of using them yet?

    Read the article

  • Is there such a thing as "closure" with software work?

    - by Bobby Tables
    I burned out last year (after a decade of fulltime programming jobs) and am on a sabbatical now. With all the self-examination I've started to figure out some of the root causes of my burnout, and one of the major ones is basically this: there was never any real closure in any of the work I've ever done. It was always a case of getting into an open-ended support/maintenance grind and going stale. When I first entered the industry, I had this image of programming work being very project-based. And I expected projects to have a start, beginning, and END. And then you move on and start on something totally new and fresh. Basically I never expected that a lot (most) of software work involves supporting and maintaining the same code base for open-ended long periods of time - years and even decades. That, combined with generally having itchy feet makes me think that burnout is inevitable for me, after 2-3 years, in ANY fulltime software job. All this sounds like I probably should have been a contractor instead of a fulltimer. But when I discuss this with people, a lot of them say that even THEN you can't really escape having to go back and maintain/support the stuff you worked on, over and over (eg. Coming back on support contracts, for example). The nature of software work is simply like that. There is no project closure, unlike in many other engineering fields. So my question is - Is there ANY programming work out there which is based on short to mid term projects/stints and then moving on cleanly? And is there any particular industry domain or specialization where this kind of project work is typical?

    Read the article

  • Are there currently any modern, standardized, aptitude test for software engineering?

    - by Matthew Patrick Cashatt
    Background I am a working software engineer who is in the midst of seeking out a new contract for the next year or so. In my search, I am enduring several absurd technical interviews as indicated by this popular question I asked earlier today. Even if the questions I was being asked weren't almost always absurd, I would be tired nonetheless of answering them many times over for various contract opportunities. So this got me thinking that having a standardized exam that working software professionals could take would provide a common scorecard that could be referenced by interviewers in lieu of absurd technical interview questions (i.e. nerd hazing). Question Is there a standardized software engineering aptitude test (SEAT??) available for working professionals to take? If there isn't a such an exam out there, what questions or topics should be covered? An additional thought Please keep in mind, if suggesting a question or topic, to focus on questions or topics that would be relevant to contemporary development practices and realistic needs in the workforce as that would be the point of a standard aptitude test. In other words, no clown traversal questions.

    Read the article

  • Releasing software/Using Continuous Integration - What do most companies seem to use?

    - by Sagar
    I've set up our continuous integration system, and it has been working for about a year now. We have finally reached a point where we want to do releases using the same. Before our CI system, the process(es) that was used was: (Develop) -> Ready for release -> Create a branch -> (Build -> Fix bugs as QA finds them) Loop -> Final build -> Tag (Develop) -> Ready for release -> (build -> fix bugs) Loop -> Tag Our CI setup: 1 server for development (DEV) 1 server for qa/release (QA) The second one has integrated into CI perfectly. I create a branch when the software is ready for release, and the branch never changes thereafter, which means the build is reproduceable without having to change the CI job. Any future development takes place on HEAD, and even maintainence releases get a completely new branch and a completely new job, which remains on the CI system forever, and then some. The first method is harder to adapt. If the branch changes, the build is not reproduceable unless I use the tag to build [jobs on the CI server uses the branch for QA/RELEASE, and HEAD for development builds]. However, if I use the tag to build, I have to create a new CI job to build from the tag (lose changelog on server), or change the existing job (lose original job configuration). I know this sounds complicated, and if required, I will rewrite/edit to explain the situation better. However, my question: [If at all] what process does your company use to release software using continuous integration systems. Is it even done using the CI system, or manually?

    Read the article

  • Best multi-platform mobile development tool, or use iPhone tools?

    - by Jesse Millikan
    I may be building a mobile app for a client soon. Their primary focus is the iPhone, but my boss would like to be able to target multiple platforms if it's feasible. The app will probably be a large but technically simple business application backed by a web service. So, here's the question as I see it: What is currently the strongest cross-platform mobile development tool that supports iOS? Would you choose it over native development tools? If you choose native, contrast it with a cross-platform tool you've used. In addition, For a project of the type we're expecting, what's the level of effort for your chosen tool versus other tools? What's the actual level of support of the tool for other platforms and their unique look and feel, capabilities, etc.? How thorough is the documentation of the product? How well do you like the development experience itself, e.g. the language, tools, documentation? Is it something you would choose to do long-term? I'll put a bounty out unless I get fantastic answers.

    Read the article

  • When is it ever ok to write your own development tools? (editor into IDE)

    - by mario
    So I'm foremost using a text editor for coding. It's a very bare bones editor; provides mostly just syntax highlighting. But on rare occasions I also need to debug something. And that's when I have to resort to an IDE (mostly Netbeans, but got fiddly Eclipse/Aptana working as second fallback). For general use however IDEs feel not workable to me. It's a visual thing, being used to console UIs etc. And switching back and forth between a text editor and an IDE is slightly cumbersome too. That's why I'm considering extending the editor, not really into a full-fledged IDE - but at the very least integrate a debug feature. Since I'm working on PHP, it seems not that much effort. The DBGp allows to externalize a debug handler from the editor, so it's just minor integration work and figuring out how to shoehorn a breakpoint feature into the editor (joe btw). And while I've also got time to do that, I'm wondering if this is really worthwhile. In this case it's not a needed development tool. It's just for convenience. And the cause for doing it is basically just not liking the existing solution. While over time I might extend and adapt this debugger thing, it initially will be as circumstantial as Eclipse. It inevitably starts out as poor development tool. Furthermore there is likely not much reuse. (Okay, this is not an important point. Most such software exists sans much of a use case. And also obviously, similar extensions already exist for emacs and vim, so it cannot be completely pointless.) But what's a general guideline on attempting to conoct custom development tools, particularily if they are not really needed but satisfy personal preferences? (Usability enhancement not certain.)

    Read the article

  • When can I publish a software tool written at work?

    - by AlexMA
    I'm working on a software problem at work that is fairly generic, but I can't find a library I like to solve it, so I'm considering writing one myself (at least a bare-bones version). I'll be writing some if not all of the 1.0 version at work, since I need it for the project. If turns out well I might want to bring the work home and polish it up just for fun, and maybe release it as an open-source project. However, I'm concerned that if I wrote the 1.0 version at work I may not be allowed to do this from a legal sense. Obviously I could ask my boss (who probably won't care), but I'm curious how other programmers have dealt with this issue and where the law stands here. My one sentence question is, When is it okay (legally/ethically) to open-source a software tool originally written by you for work at work? What if you have expanded the original source significantly during off-hours? Follow-up: Suppose I write the whole thing at home on my time then simply use it at work, does that change things drastically? Follow-up 2: Note that I'm not trying to rip off my employer (I understand that they're paying me to build products that they own)--I'm just wondering if there's a fair way of doing this for all involved... It would be nice if some nonprofit down the road could use my code and save them some time. Also, there's another issue at stake. If I write the library for a very simple, generic thing (like HTML tables in Javascript), does that mean I can never again do so on my own time without putting myself at legal risk (even if it was a whole new fresh rewrite or a segment of a larger project). Am I surrendering my right to write code for this sort of project for the rest of my life (without this company's permission), since the code at work might still be somewhere in my brain influencing me? This seems related to software patents, as a side-note.

    Read the article

  • FREE three days of online SharePoint 2010 development training for UK software houses Feb 9th to 11th

    - by Eric Nelson
    I have been working to get a SharePoint development course delivered online in February and March – online means lots of opportunities to ask questions. The first dates are now in place. The training is being delivered as a benefit for companies signed up to Microsoft Platform Ready. It is intended for UK based companies who develop software products* Agenda: Day 1 (Live Meeting 3 hours) 1:30 - 4:30 •         Getting Started with SharePoint: Understand why and how to start developing for SharePoint 2010 •         SharePoint 2010 Developer Roadmap:  Explore the new capabilities and features •         UI Enhancements: How to take advantage of the many UI enhancements including the fluent UI ribbon and  extensible dialog system. Day 2 (Live Meeting 3 hours) 1:30 - 4:30 •         Visual Studio 2010 Tools for SharePoint 2010: Overview of the project and item templates and a walkthrough of the designers •         Sandboxed Solutions: The new deployment model can help mitigate the risk of deploying custom code   •         LINQ to SharePoint:  SharePoint now fully supports LINQ for querying lists Day 3 (Live Meeting 3 hours) 1:30 - 4:30 •         Client Object Model: The Client OM can be accessed via web services, via a client (JavaScript) API, and via REST •         Accessing External Data: Business Connectivity Services (BCS) enables integration with back end systems •         Workflow: A powerful mechanism to create functionality using Windows Workflow Foundation Register for FREE (and tell your colleagues – we have a pretty decent capacity) To take advantage of this you need to: Sign your company up to Microsoft Platform Ready and record your SharePoint interest against one of your companies products Read about Microsoft Platform Ready Navigate to the “Get Technical Benefits” tab for SharePoint and click on Register Today You will then ultimately get an email with details of the Live Meeting to join on the 9th. But you should also favourite the team blog for any last minute details * Such companies are often referred to as an Independent Software Vendors. My team is focused on companies that create products used by many other companies or individuals. That could be a packaged product you can buy "off the shelf" or a Web Site offering a service - the definition is actually pretty wide these days :-) What it does not include is a company building software which will only be used by its own people.

    Read the article

  • How can we best petition to bring Adobe creative software to Ubuntu?

    - by Sixthlaw
    Now I know its not as simple as asking for Adobe to support their design software on Ubuntu, but is there a way for the community and Canonical to make known to Adobe the rapidly growing amount of Linux users, and their desire for this great set of tools OFFICIALLY? I know that many of the answers I receive might be of the fashion "Its not going to happen", "use the free tools provided" or "Who knows it might happen in the near future", but this IS not what I am looking for. I have noticed, on sites like www.OmgUbuntu.com, there are links to pages where people can "like" the idea. Is there a way to try and get the whole community on board with this one, even Canonical, and as stated above, put forward this proposal to Adobe. The current requests for an Adobe CS, for Linux, are in dribs and drabs scattered all of the internet. Now is the best time to come up with productive solutions on how we can best gather statistics on the amount of people willing to buy the Adobe CS. These are the words of an Adobe employee: "I have forwarded this feedback on to the appropriate team who will consider it for future releases of Adobe software." The larger amount of people we have unified in the ONE community proposal, the greater chance we have of getting the software. How can we make this happen?

    Read the article

  • Is embedded programming closer to electrical engineering or software development?

    - by Jeremy Heiler
    I am being approached with a job for writing embedded C on micro controllers. At first I would have thought that embedding programming is to low on the software stack for me, but maybe I am thinking about it wrong. Normally I would have shrugged off an opportunity to write embedded code, as I don't consider myself an electrical engineer. Is this a bad assumption? Am I able to write interesting and useful software for embedded systems, or will I kick myself for dropping too low on the software stack? I went to school for computer science and really enjoyed writing a compiler, managing concurrent algorithms, designing data structures, and developing frameworks. However, I am currently employed as a Flex developer, which doesn't scream the interesting things I just described. (I currently deal with issues like: "this check box needs to be 4 pixels to the left" and "this date is formatted wrong".) I appreciate everyone's input. I know I have to make the decision for myself, I just would like some clarification on what it means to be a embedded programmer, and if it fits what I find to be interesting.

    Read the article

  • How can one find software development work that involves directly the final end user?

    - by RJa
    I've worked in software development for 15 years and, while there have been signficant personal achievements and a lot of experience, I've always felt detached from the man/woman-on-the-street, the every day person, how it affects their lives, in a number of ways: the technologies: embedded software, hidden away, stuff not seen by the everyday person. Or process technology supporting manufactured products the size of the systems, meaning many jobs, divided up, work is abstract, not one person can see the whole picture the organisations: large, with departments dealing with different areas, the software, the hardware, the marketing, the sales, the customer support the locations and hours: out-of-town business parks away from the rest of society, fixed locations, inflexible: 9-5 everyday This to me seems typical of the companies I worked for and see elsewhere. Granted, there are positives such as the technology itself and usually being among high calibre co-workers, but the above points frustrate me about the industry because they detach the work from its meaning. How can one: change these things in an existing job, or compensate for them? find other work that avoids these and connects with the final end user? Job designs tend to focus on the job content and technical requirements rather than how the job aims to fulfil end user needs, is meaningful.

    Read the article

  • Should developers do their own software releases (if there is a prod support team in place)?

    - by leora
    I know there are going to always be differences depending on the particular size, staff etc, but i wanted to get feedback in general around: In an environment where you have a production support team doing first line support and release management, is it better to simply have developers manage their own releases instead? In this case, its internal software at an insurance company but the question should be valid at any company, size, etc I think. Currently, we have our production team do releases but there is an argument that its inefficient and that if you allowed developers the ability to do it, they will focus more on making it simple and efficient and avoid basically passing on scripts, etc to run to another team. The counter argument is that if you don't have a check and balance, you could get a software team (or an individual) that doesn't a very hacky job about getting their software out there (making on the fly changes, not documenting the process, etc) and that by forcing the prod support team to do the actual release, it enforces consistency and proper checks and balances. I know this is not a black or white issue but I wanted to see what folks thought on this so the discipline and consistency is there but without the feeling that an inefficient process is in place.

    Read the article

  • How should a non-IT manager secure the long-term maintenance and development of essential legacy software?

    - by user105977
    I've been hunting for a place to ask this question for quite a while; maybe this is the place, although I'm afraid it's not the kind of "question with an answer" this site would prefer. We are a small, very specialized, benefits administration firm with an extremely useful, robust collection of software, some written in COBOL but most in BASIC. Two full-time consultants have ably maintained and improved this system over more than 30 years. Needless to say they will soon retire. (One of them has been desperate to retire for several years but is loyal to a fault and so hangs on despite her husband's insistence that golf should take priority.) We started down the path of converting to a system developed by one of only three firms in the country that offer the type of software we use. We now feel that although this this firm is theoretically capable of completing the conversion process, they don't have the resources to do so timely, and we have come to believe that they will be unable to offer the kind of service we need to run our business. (There's nothing like being able to set one's own priorities and having the authority to allocate one's resources as one sees fit.) Hardware is not a problem--we are able to emulate very effectively on modern servers. If COBOL and BASIC were modern languages, we'd be willing to take the risk that we could find replacements for our current consultants going forward. It seems like there ought to be a business model for an IT support firm that concentrates on legacy platforms like this and provides the programming and software development talent to support a system like ours, removing from our backs the risks of finding the right programming talent and the job of convincing younger programmers that they can have a productive, rewarding career, in part in an old, non-sexy language like BASIC. Where do I find such firms?

    Read the article

  • When to open source a project under development? [closed]

    - by QuasarDonkey
    Possible Duplicate: Is it OK to push my code to GitHub while it is still in early development? I've been working on a hobby project for a few months now; it's clocking in at over 15000 source lines of code. A number of people have expressed interest in joining development, and I have full intentions of going open source, since it would not be feasible for me to complete the project alone. I'm just not sure when to open-source it. For context, I've notice many successful open source projects, such as the Linux kernel, had considerable work done before they were open-sourced. In my case, I'd been planning on open-sourcing it after I complete all the underlying libraries and overall architecture. Is this a mistake; should I just release it right now? I'm worried that since certain critical underlying components haven't been finalized, if people build a large codebase around them, it will be very difficult to change or fix things later. On the other hand, it's a very large project that will require multiple developers to complete in a reasonable time. So when is the right time during development to go open source? Preferably, I'd like to hear from some folks who have started their own projects.

    Read the article

  • Path Not Found error when opening VB6 project from a shared folder on Virtual PC 2007 (XP sp3)

    - by law1185
    I currently work on a small software team that primarily maintains legacy software. I am trying to set up a VirtualPC that we can use to do this maintenance. Specifically, I would like to be able to debug and run VB6 web apps from a folder on the host pc. My constraints are as follows: The VirtualPC will not be registered on the domain. The server that hosts our Subversion repository does not run the subversion service so the only way to interact with the repository is through "file:\\", which requires domain authentication. It is not possible to debug/run VB6 web apps that are located on mapped network drives, because IIS requires that the VirtualPC be on the same domain as the network drive I would like to avoid having to copy the folder from the host pc to the VirtualPC and then copying it back in order to have the latest revision from Subversion So, I am trying to use VirtualPC's shared folder feature to share the host machine's Subversion directory and open the project in VB6 on the VirtualPC. Problem is that Visual Basic throws the error: "Path not found: '\\C:\\Subversion\Path\Project.vbp'" when I try to open it. Folder C:\Subversion on the host machine is mapped to G: on the VirtualPC. If anyone can help me resolve this error or find some other way to accomplish this, I would be deeply grateful. Oh, both host and virtual OS is Windows XP sp3. Using VB 6.0, IIS v5.1. I can manipulate files in the shared directory freely from the VirtualPC ie. copy, paste, delete, etc. Edit: Link to screenshot: http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/5439/vpcscreen.png

    Read the article

  • How can I write good "research code"?

    - by John
    "Research code" is often held up as a paragon of what not to do when writing software. Certainly, the kind of code that often results from trying to solve a research problem can end up being poorly-designed, difficult to debug, etc. But my question is this: does research code have to be this way? Is it possible to write good research code? Is the only approach to consider the first version a poorly-written prototype to be discarded in favour of the better-designed second version? Software engineering has all sorts of best practices about how to design and write good code, but I don't usually find this relevant when you don't have a good idea ahead of time what the final system will look like. The final system is likely to be a result of what did or didn't work along the way, and the only way to determine what does or doesn't work is to write the code first. As you find things that don't work, you change what the final system looks like, moving further away from your original design (assuming you had one). I'd be interested in any personal experience with these issues, as well as any books or other resources anyone can point me to.

    Read the article

  • How important is PhD research topic to getting a job?

    - by thornate
    EDIT: This has been closed and I realise that I may not have been specific enough with the original title. I ask two questions here: The general one (Does a PhD help get a job?) which has been asked elsewhere, and the specific one (Is it possible to get work outside of the specific research field?). Assume I've already decided going to do the phd. I'm just stressing about the research topic. Well, I'm one year out of university (Mechatronics engineering and Software Eng double bachelors), worked for a few months then got retrenched (yay economy!). It's looking less and less likely that I'll get a job worth having with the job market as it is, so I'm thinking about going back to uni to do a PhD. I figure that by the time I'm done, the job market will have improved and hopefully I'll have something on my resume that is more attractive than spending three years doing customer support for accounting software. So, my question is to people who've done PhD's. Would you say that they were worth the effort? How important is the research topic to future job-seeking success? The idea I have is a computer-sciencey/neural-networks/data-mining thing which I think is very interesting, but not a field I want to be in forever. My potential supervisor claims that employers don't care so much about the topic of the research but rather the peripheral skills that are developed through a PhD; time managment, self-restraint, planning and whatnot. How does this mesh with people's real world experience? I'd appreciate any advice before signing my life on the line for the next three years. See also: Should developers go to grad school? Best reason not to hire a PhD? How to find an entry-level job after you already have a graduate degree?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >