Search Results

Search found 21171 results on 847 pages for 'android testing'.

Page 29/847 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

  • Intent filter for browsing XML (specifically rss) in android

    - by Leif Andersen
    I have an activity that I want to run every time the user goes to an xml (specifically rss) page in the browser (at least assuming the user get's it from the list of apps that can support it). I currently already have the current intent filter: <activity android:name=".activities.EpisodesListActivity" android:theme="@android:style/Theme.NoTitleBar"> <intent-filter> <category android:name="android.intent.category.BROWSABLE"></category> <category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT"></category> <action android:name="android.intent.action.VIEW"></action> <data android:scheme="http"></data> </intent-filter> </activity> Now as you can guess, this is an evil intent, as it wants to open whenever a page is requested via http. However, when I ad the line: <data android:mimeType="application/rss+xml"></data> to make it: <activity android:name=".activities.EpisodesListActivity" android:theme="@android:style/Theme.NoTitleBar"> <intent-filter> <category android:name="android.intent.category.BROWSABLE"></category> <category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT"></category> <action android:name="android.intent.action.VIEW"></action> <data android:scheme="http"></data> <data android:mimeType="application/rss+xml"></data> </intent-filter> </activity> The application no longer claims to be able to run rss files. Also, if I change the line to: <data android:mimeType="application/xml"></data> It also won't work (for generic xml file even). So what intent filter do I need to make in order to claim that the activity supports rss. (Also, bonus points if you can tell me how I know what URL it was the user opened. So far, I've always sent that information from one activity to the other using extras). Thank you for your help

    Read the article

  • Android: onListItemClick not getting called in ListActivity

    - by user521469
    I'm having problems with my first Android app. I have subclassed ListActivity, and I'm having no luck getting the overridden onListItemClick() to respond to click events. I've read focus can be a problem, but changing focus in the XML files does not seem to work. Here's the relevant bits of code. Anyone see what's I've buggered up? public class Notepadv1 extends ListActivity { private int mNoteNumber = 1; private NotesDbAdapter mDbHelper; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.notepad_list); mDbHelper = new NotesDbAdapter(this); mDbHelper.open(); fillData(); } private void fillData() { // Get all of the notes from the database and create the item list Cursor c = mDbHelper.fetchAllNotes(); startManagingCursor(c); String[] from = new String[] { NotesDbAdapter.KEY_TITLE }; int[] to = new int[] { R.id.text1 }; SimpleCursorAdapter notes = new SimpleCursorAdapter(this, R.layout.notes_row, c, from, to); setListAdapter(notes); } @Override public void onListItemClick (ListView l, View v, int position, long id){ super.onListItemClick(l, v, position, id); AlertDialog alert = new AlertDialog.Builder(this).create(); String message = "row clicked!"; alert.setMessage(message); alert.show(); } notepad_list.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content"> <ListView android:id="@android:id/list" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:dividerHeight="6dp"/> <TextView android:id="@android:id/empty" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="@string/no_notes" /> </LinearLayout> And notes_row.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <TextView android:id="@+id/text1" xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="60dp" android:focusable="false"/>

    Read the article

  • Help with listView in Android

    - by jul
    Hi, I'm just starting with Android and can't find how to display a list in my activity. I get some restaurant data from a web service and I'd like to show the results in a list. The activity, the restaurant class and the layout main.xml are shown below. How can I display, for instance, the list of the restaurant names in the ListView 'list' of my layout? thank you Jul public class Atable extends ListActivity { RestaurantList restaurantList; public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); //Here I set restaurantList //Now how can I display, for example, the list of the names of the restaurants } main.xml <LinearLayout android:orientation="horizontal" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"> <TextView android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="@string/search" /> <EditText android:id="@+id/search" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_weight="1"/> </LinearLayout> <LinearLayout android:orientation="vertical" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content"> <ListView android:id="@+id/android:list" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content"/> <TextView android:id="@+id/android:empty" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="@string/noresults"/> </LinearLayout> </LinearLayout> Restaurant list class package org.digitalfarm.atable; import java.util.List; public class RestaurantList { private List<Restaurant> restaurants; public List<Restaurant> getRestaurants() { return restaurants; } public void setRestaurants(List<Restaurant> restaurants) { this.restaurants = restaurants; } } Restaurant class package org.digitalfarm.atable; public class Restaurant { private String name; private float latitude; private float longitude; public String getName() { return name; } public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } public float getLatitude() { return latitude; } public void setLatitude(float latitude) { this.latitude = latitude; } public float getLongitude() { return longitude; } public void setLongitude(float longitude) { this.longitude = longitude; } }

    Read the article

  • Collaboration using github and testing the code

    - by wyred
    The procedure in my team is that we all commit our code to the same development branch. We have a test server that runs updated code from this branch so that we can test our code on the servers. The problem is that if we want to merge the development branch to the master branch in order to publish new features to our production servers, some features that may not have been ready will be applied to the production servers. So we're considering having each developer work on a feature/topic branch where each of them work on their own features and when it's ready, merge it into the development branch for testing, and then into the master branch. However, because our test server only pulls changes from the development branch, the developers are unable to test their features. While this is not a huge issue as they can test it on their local machine, the only problem I foresee is if we want to test callbacks from third-party services like sendgrid (where you specify a url for sendgrid to update you on the status of emails sent out). How to handle this problem? Note: We're not advanced git users. We use the Github app for MacOSX and Windows to commit our work.

    Read the article

  • User Acceptance Testing Defect Classification when developing for an outside client

    - by DannyC
    I am involved in a large development project in which we (a very small start up) are developing for an outside client (a very large company). We recently received their first output from UAT testing of a fairly small iteration, which listed 12 'defects', triaged into three categories : Low, Medium and High. The issue we have is around whether everything in this list should be recorded as a 'defect' - some of the issues they found would be better described as refinements, or even 'nice-to-haves', and some we think are not defects at all. They client's QA lead says that it is standard for them to label every issues they identify as a defect, however, we are a bit uncomfortable about this. Whilst the relationship is good, we don't see a huge problem with this, but we are concerned that, if the relationship suffers in the future, these lists of 'defects' could prove costly for us. We don't want to come across as being difficult, or taking things too personally here, and we are happy to make all of the changes identified, however we are a bit concerned especially as there is a uneven power balance at play in our relationship. Are we being paranoid here? Or could we be setting ourselves up for problems down the line by agreeing to this classification?

    Read the article

  • Customizing the NUnit GUI for data-driven testing

    - by rwong
    My test project consists of a set of input data files which is fed into a piece of legacy third-party software. Since the input data files for this software are difficult to construct (not something that can be done intentionally), I am not going to add new input data files. Each input data file will be subject to a set of "test functions". Some of the test functions can be invoked independently. Other test functions represent the stages of a sequential operation - if an earlier stage fails, the subsequent stages do not need to be executed. I have experimented with the NUnit parametrized test case (TestCaseAttribute and TestCaseSourceAttribute), passing in the list of data files as test cases. I am generally satisfied with the the ability to select the input data for testing. However, I would like to see if it is possible to customize its GUI's tree structure, so that the "test functions" become the children of the "input data". For example: File #1 CheckFileTypeTest GetFileTopLevelStructureTest CompleteProcessTest StageOneTest StageTwoTest StageThreeTest File #2 CheckFileTypeTest GetFileTopLevelStructureTest CompleteProcessTest StageOneTest StageTwoTest StageThreeTest This will be useful for identifying the stage that failed during the processing of a particular input file. Is there any tips and tricks that will enable the new tree layout? Do I need to customize NUnit to get this layout?

    Read the article

  • Testing of visualization projects

    - by paxRoman
    We develop small to large visualization projects for different tasks and industries and sometimes while rewriting them a couple of times in the process we hit walls because we discover that we need to add a lot of code to support new requirements. Now we have established a design process that seems to work well (at least we reduced the development time for each new project quite a bit), but we're still left scratching our heads around this question: what exactly should we test when testing visualizations? If everything that we want to explore is on the screen (bounded visualizations)? If the data is ok - if data is valid (that's one of the nice things about visualizations you can spot errors in your datasets)? Usability? User interaction? Code quality? I can tell you for sure that a simple check of the code quality is certainly not enough! Is there a classic paper / book about how to test visualizations? Also do you happen to know about classic design patterns for visualizations (except the obvious ones like Pub-Sub)?

    Read the article

  • Android: ProgressDialog.show() crashes with getApplicationContext

    - by Felix
    I can't seem to grasp why this is happening. This code: mProgressDialog = ProgressDialog.show(this, "", getString(R.string.loading), true); works just fine. However, this code: mProgressDialog = ProgressDialog.show(getApplicationContext(), "", getString(R.string.loading), true); throws the following exception: W/WindowManager( 569): Attempted to add window with non-application token WindowToken{438bee58 token=null}. Aborting. D/AndroidRuntime( 2049): Shutting down VM W/dalvikvm( 2049): threadid=3: thread exiting with uncaught exception (group=0x4001aa28) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): Uncaught handler: thread main exiting due to uncaught exception E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to start activity ComponentInfo{com.tastekid.TasteKid/com.tastekid.TasteKid.YouTube}: android.view.WindowManager$BadTokenException: Unable to add window -- token null is not for an application E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2401) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2417) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread.access$2100(ActivityThread.java:116) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:1794) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:123) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:4203) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:791) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:549) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): Caused by: android.view.WindowManager$BadTokenException: Unable to add window -- token null is not for an application E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.view.ViewRoot.setView(ViewRoot.java:460) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.view.WindowManagerImpl.addView(WindowManagerImpl.java:177) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.view.WindowManagerImpl.addView(WindowManagerImpl.java:91) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.Dialog.show(Dialog.java:238) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ProgressDialog.show(ProgressDialog.java:107) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ProgressDialog.show(ProgressDialog.java:90) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at com.tastekid.TasteKid.YouTube.onCreate(YouTube.java:45) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1123) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2364) E/AndroidRuntime( 2049): ... 11 more Any ideas why this is happening? I'm calling this from the onCreate method.

    Read the article

  • Android visibility issue with checkbox

    - by fxi
    Hi all! I´m using a checkbox in my code that when its checked it makes a textview and a editText visibles, but if I uncheck de checkbox they continue being visible instead of dissapear. Here is the code: final CheckBox save = (CheckBox) findViewById(R.id.checkbox); save.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v) { // Perform action on clicks, depending on whether it's now checked if (((CheckBox) v).isChecked()) { nameText.setVisibility(1); editName.setVisibility(1); } else { nameText.setVisibility(0); editName.setVisibility(0); } } }); And part of the xml which is inside an Relative Layout: <LinearLayout android:id="@+id/linearLayout3" android:orientation="horizontal" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_below = "@+id/linearLayout2"> <TextView android:id="@+id/text" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="@string/name" android:visibility="invisible"/> <EditText android:id="@+id/name" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_weight="1" android:visibility="invisible"/> <CheckBox android:id="@+id/checkbox" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="@string/save" /> </LinearLayout> What should i do to make the textView and EditText dissapear when i uncheck the checkbox? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • android throw InvocationTargetException,How to modify the error

    - by fonter
    ActivityManager am = (ActivityManager)this.getSystemService(this.ACTIVITY_SERVICE); try { clearMethod = am.getClass() .getMethod("clearApplicationUserData", String.class, IPackageDataObserver.class); } catch (Exception e) { Log.e("Error", "Android Error",e); clearMethod = null; } if(clearMethod!=null){ try { clearMethod.invoke(am,"com.android.browser",new ClearUserDataObserver()); } catch (Exception e) { Log.e("Error", "Android Exception",e); } } Exception 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityManager.clearApplicationUserData(ActivityManager.java:475) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at com.iwidsets.clear.manager.AndClear.onCreate(AndClear.java:34) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnCreate(Instrumentation.java:1123) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2364) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2417) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityThread.access$2100(ActivityThread.java:116) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:1794) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:123) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:4203) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:791) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:549) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at dalvik.system.NativeStart.main(Native Method) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: 739 does not have permission:android.permission.CLEAR_APP_USER_DATA to clear datafor process:com.android.browser 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1218) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.os.Parcel.readException(Parcel.java:1206) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): at android.app.ActivityManagerProxy.clearApplicationUserData(ActivityManagerNative.java:2016) 05-26 08:34:13.056: ERROR/Error(739): ... 17 more

    Read the article

  • android logging sdcard

    - by Abhi Rao
    Hello, With Android-Emulator I am not able to write/create a file on the SD Card (for logging). Here is what I have done so far - Run mksdcard 8192K C:\android-dev\emu_sdcard\emu_logFile - Create a new AVD, when assign emu_logFile to it so that when I view the AVD Details it says C:\android-dev\emu_sdcard\emu_logFile against the field "SD Card" - Here is the relevant code public class ZLogger { static PrintWriter zLogWriter = null; private static void Initialize() { try { File sdDir = Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory(); if (sdDir.canWrite()) { : File logFile = new File (sdDir, VERSION.RELEASE + "_" + ".log"); FileWriter logFileWriter = new FileWriter(logFile); zLogWriter = new PrintWriter(logFileWriter); zLogWriter.write("\n\n - " + date + " - \n"); } } catch (IOException e) { Log.e("ZLogger", "Count not write to file: " + e.getMessage()); } } sdDir.canWrite returns false - please note it not the exception from adb shell when I do ls I see sdcard as link to /mnt/sdcard. When I do ls -l /mnt here is what I see ls -l /mnt ls -l /mnt drwxr-xr-x root system 2010-12-24 03:41 asec drwx------ root root 2010-12-24 03:41 secure d--------- system system 2010-12-24 03:41 sdcard whereas if I go to the directory where I created emu_sdcard - I see a lock has been issued, as shown here C:dir android-dev\emu_sdcard Volume in drive C is Preload Volume Serial Number is A4F3-6C29 Directory of C:\android-dev\emu_sdcard 12/24/2010 03:41 AM . 12/24/2010 03:41 AM .. 12/24/2010 03:17 AM 8,388,608 emu_logFile 12/24/2010 03:41 AM emu_logFile.lock 1 File(s) 8,388,608 bytes 3 Dir(s) 50,347,704,320 bytes free I have looked at these and other SO questions Android Emulator sdcard push error: Read-only file system (2) Not able to view SDCard folder in the FileExplorer of Android Eclipse I have added the following to AndroidManifest.xml **uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE" ** Please let me know your thoughts - what am I missing here? Why does canWrite return false? What should I do to add permissions to sdcard?

    Read the article

  • Why Your Android Phone Isn’t Getting Operating System Updates and What You Can Do About It

    - by Chris Hoffman
    Several times a year, Google releases a new version of Android with new features and performance improvements. Unfortunately, most Android devices in the wild will never get the update. New Android users are often disappointed to discover that their shiny new smartphone won’t get any updates – or worse, that it was running old software from the moment they bought it. Image Credit: Johan Larsson on Flickr Why Your Android Phone Isn’t Getting Operating System Updates and What You Can Do About It How To Delete, Move, or Rename Locked Files in Windows HTG Explains: Why Screen Savers Are No Longer Necessary

    Read the article

  • Do unit tests sometimes break encapsulation?

    - by user1288851
    I very often hear the following: "If you want to test private methods, you'd better put that in another class and expose it." While sometimes that's the case and we have a hiding concept inside our class, other times you end up with classes that have the same attributes (or, worst, every attribute of one class become a argument on a method in the other class) and exposes functionality that is, in fact, implementation detail. Specially on TDD, when you refactor a class with public methods out of a previous tested class, that class is now part of your interface, but has no tests to it (since you refactored it, and is a implementation detail). Now, I may be not finding an obvious better answer, but if my answer is the "correct", that means that sometimes writting unit tests can break encapsulation, and divide the same responsibility into different classes. A simple example would be testing a setter method when a getter is not actually needed for anything in the real code. Please when aswering don't provide simple answers to specific cases I may have written. Rather, try to explain more of the generic case and theoretical approach. And this is neither language specific. Thanks in advance. EDIT: The answer given by Matthew Flynn was really insightful, but didn't quite answer the question. Altough he made the fair point that you either don't test private methods or extract them because they really are other concern and responsibility (or at least that was what I could understand from his answer), I think there are situations where unit testing private methods is useful. My primary example is when you have a class that has one responsibility but the output (or input) that it gives (takes) is just to complex. For example, a hashing function. There's no good way to break a hashing function apart and mantain cohesion and encapsulation. However, testing a hashing function can be really tough, since you would need to calculate by hand (you can't use code calculation to test code calculation!) the hashing, and test multiple cases where the hash changes. In that way (and this may be a question worth of its own topic) I think private method testing is the best way to handle it. Now, I'm not sure if I should ask another question, or ask it here, but are there any better way to test such complex output (input)? OBS: Please, if you think I should ask another question on that topic, leave a comment. :)

    Read the article

  • Should adapters or wrappers be unit tested?

    - by m3th0dman
    Suppose that I have a class that implements some logic: public MyLogicImpl implements MyLogic { public void myLogicMethod() { //my logic here } } and somewhere else a test class: public MyLogicImplTest { @Test public void testMyLogicMethod() { /test my logic } } I also have: @WebService public MyWebServices class { @Inject private MyLogic myLogic; @WebMethod public void myLogicWebMethod() { myLogic.myLogicMethod(); } } Should there be a test unit for myLogicWebMethod or should the testing for it be handled in integration testing.

    Read the article

  • Unit Testing with NUnit and Moles Redux

    - by João Angelo
    Almost two years ago, when Moles was still being packaged alongside Pex, I wrote a post on how to run NUnit tests supporting moled types. A lot has changed since then and Moles is now being distributed independently of Pex, but maintaining support for integration with NUnit and other testing frameworks. For NUnit the support is provided by an addin class library (Microsoft.Moles.NUnit.dll) that you need to reference in your test project so that you can decorate yours tests with the MoledAttribute. The addin DLL must also be placed in the addins folder inside the NUnit installation directory. There is however a downside, since Moles and NUnit follow a different release cycle and the addin DLL must be built against a specific NUnit version, you may find that the release included with the latest version of Moles does not work with your version of NUnit. Fortunately the code for building the NUnit addin is supplied in the archive (moles.samples.zip) that you can found in the Documentation folder inside the Moles installation directory. By rebuilding the addin against your specific version of NUnit you are able to support any version. Also to note that in Moles 0.94.51023.0 the addin code did not support the use of TestCaseAttribute in your moled tests. However, if you need this support, you need to make just a couple of changes. Change the ITestDecorator.Decorate method in the MolesAddin class: Test ITestDecorator.Decorate(Test test, MemberInfo member) { SafeDebug.AssumeNotNull(test, "test"); SafeDebug.AssumeNotNull(member, "member"); bool isTestFixture = true; isTestFixture &= test.IsSuite; isTestFixture &= test.FixtureType != null; bool hasMoledAttribute = true; hasMoledAttribute &= !SafeArray.IsNullOrEmpty( member.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(MoledAttribute), false)); if (!isTestFixture && hasMoledAttribute) { return new MoledTest(test); } return test; } Change the Tests property in the MoledTest class: public override System.Collections.IList Tests { get { if (this.test.Tests == null) { return null; } var moled = new List<Test>(this.test.Tests.Count); foreach (var test in this.test.Tests) { moled.Add(new MoledTest((Test)test)); } return moled; } } Disclaimer: I only tested this implementation against NUnit 2.5.10.11092 version. Finally you just need to run the NUnit console runner through the Moles runner. A quick example follows: moles.runner.exe [Tests.dll] /r:nunit-console.exe /x86 /args:[NUnitArgument1] /args:[NUnitArgument2]

    Read the article

  • Android 3.0 Music Player Video Preview

    - by Gopinath
    Earlier this week, some folks over on the XDA developers forum got their hands on a leaked test build of a revamped Android music player that could possibly be shipping with Android’s next OS upgrade, Honeycomb. This evening the footage was spotted by Engadget, and now the word is spreading like wildfire: Android is going to get a default music player that isn’t totally mediocre. via TechCrunch This article titled,Android 3.0 Music Player Video Preview, was originally published at Tech Dreams. Grab our rss feed or fan us on Facebook to get updates from us.

    Read the article

  • How to Run Android Apps on Your Desktop the Easy Way

    - by YatriTrivedi
    Ever feel like running an Android app on your Windows machine? Using BlueStacks, you can easily get apps from your Android device to your desktop or laptop without any complicated set up or fussing with the Android SDK. How to Run Android Apps on Your Desktop the Easy Way HTG Explains: Do You Really Need to Defrag Your PC? Use Amazon’s Barcode Scanner to Easily Buy Anything from Your Phone

    Read the article

  • Proper way to implement Android XML onClick attribute in Activity

    - by Austyn Mahoney
    I have used the android:onClick attribute extensively in my XML layouts for my Android application. Example: <Button android:id="@+id/exampleButton" android:onClick="onButtonClick" /> Is it proper to create an Interface to enforce the implementation of those onClick methods in Activities that use that layout file? public interface MyButtonInterface { public onButtonClick(View v); }

    Read the article

  • Continue with Java for pc or go to android? [on hold]

    - by Chris London
    so I have been learning java from Deitel's learn java 9th edition. I am up to GUI's and a have a pretty good grasp on OOP etc. I want to go straight to the mobile app development scene, I believe I will learn a fair bit there on using API's, and other tools to develop apps. I am not sure weather I should carry on with PC coding (GUI's etc etc) or skip it all and go direct to learning the Android SDK. So, should I carry on, learn about sockets, writing and reading files, GUI's for PC etc or get a book and jump into android? Thanks a lot guys.

    Read the article

  • Android AsyncTask testing problem with Android Test Framework

    - by Vlad
    I have a very simple AsyncTask implementation example and have problem to test it using Android JUnit framework. It works just fine when I instantiate and execute it in normal application. However when it's executed from any of Android Testing framework classes (i.e. AndroidTestCase, ActivityUnitTestCase, ActivityInstrumentationTestCase2 etc) it behaves sarngely: - It executes doInBackground() method correctly - However it doesn't invokes any of its notification methods (onPostExecute(), onProgressUpdate(), etc) -- just silently ignores them whitout showing any errors. This is very simple AsyncTask example package kroz.andcookbook.threads.asynctask; import android.os.AsyncTask; import android.util.Log; import android.widget.ProgressBar; import android.widget.Toast; public class AsyncTaskDemo extends AsyncTask<Integer, Integer, String> { AsyncTaskDemoActivity _parentActivity; int _counter; int _maxCount; public AsyncTaskDemo(AsyncTaskDemoActivity asyncTaskDemoActivity) { _parentActivity = asyncTaskDemoActivity; } @Override protected void onPreExecute() { super.onPreExecute(); _parentActivity._progressBar.setVisibility(ProgressBar.VISIBLE); _parentActivity._progressBar.invalidate(); } @Override protected String doInBackground(Integer... params) { _maxCount = params[0]; for (_counter = 0; _counter <= _maxCount; _counter++) { try { Thread.sleep(1000); publishProgress(_counter); } catch (InterruptedException e) { // Ignore } } } @Override protected void onProgressUpdate(Integer... values) { super.onProgressUpdate(values); int progress = values[0]; String progressStr = "Counting " + progress + " out of " + _maxCount; _parentActivity._textView.setText(progressStr); _parentActivity._textView.invalidate(); } @Override protected void onPostExecute(String result) { super.onPostExecute(result); _parentActivity._progressBar.setVisibility(ProgressBar.INVISIBLE); _parentActivity._progressBar.invalidate(); } @Override protected void onCancelled() { super.onCancelled(); _parentActivity._textView.setText("Request to cancel AsyncTask"); } } This is a test case. Here AsyncTaskDemoActivity is a very simple Activity providing UI for testing AsyncTask in mode: package kroz.andcookbook.test.threads.asynctask; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException; import kroz.andcookbook.R; import kroz.andcookbook.threads.asynctask.AsyncTaskDemo; import kroz.andcookbook.threads.asynctask.AsyncTaskDemoActivity; import android.content.Intent; import android.test.ActivityUnitTestCase; import android.widget.Button; public class AsyncTaskDemoTest2 extends ActivityUnitTestCase<AsyncTaskDemoActivity> { AsyncTaskDemo _atask; private Intent _startIntent; public AsyncTaskDemoTest2() { super(AsyncTaskDemoActivity.class); } protected void setUp() throws Exception { super.setUp(); _startIntent = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_MAIN); } protected void tearDown() throws Exception { super.tearDown(); } public final void testExecute() { startActivity(_startIntent, null, null); Button btnStart = (Button) getActivity().findViewById(R.id.Button01); btnStart.performClick(); assertNotNull(getActivity()); } } All this code is working just fine, except the fact that AsynTask doesn't invoke it's notification methods when executed by whithin Android Testing Framework. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Android ListView with alternate color and on focus color

    - by Yogesh
    I need to set alternate color in list view rows but when i do that it removes/ disables the on focus default yellow background I tried with backgroundColor rowView.setBackgroundColor(SOME COLOR); also with backgrounddrwable. rowView.setBackgroundColor(R.drawable.view_odd_row_bg); <!-- Even though these two point to the same resource, have two states so the drawable will invalidate itself when coming out of pressed state. --> <item android:state_focused="true" android:state_enabled="false" android:state_pressed="true" android:drawable="@color/highlight" /> <item android:state_focused="true" android:state_enabled="false" android:drawable="@color/highlight" /> <item android:state_focused="true" android:state_pressed="true" android:drawable="@color/highlight" /> <item android:state_focused="false" android:state_pressed="true" android:drawable="@color/highlight" /> <item android:state_focused="true" android:drawable="@color/highlight" /> but it wont work. is there any way we can set background color and on focus color simultaneously which will work.

    Read the article

  • android: CheckedTextView cannot be checked?

    - by Yang
    Initially I wanted a checkmark where the text is placed on the left of the checkmark. After searching on this site I found out the best workaround is android:CheckedTextView? However, I found out that the checkmark cannot be changed manually by users. Is it by design? <CheckedTextView xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:id="@+id/autoupdatecheckboxview" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:gravity="center_vertical" android:checkMark="?android:attr/listChoiceIndicatorMultiple" android:paddingLeft="6dip" android:paddingRight="6dip" android:text="Pop up a message when new data available" android:typeface="sans" android:textSize="16dip"/>

    Read the article

  • Java method for android:layout_gravity

    - by André Leitão
    Hi folks, I would like to know if is there a way to call android:layout_gravity property from a java method. I didn't found any method in Android documentation to do it. This is the picture of the layout I want to implement: I know to do it through xml, as following: <FrameLayout xlmns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"> <Button android:layout_gravity="left|center_vertical" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text="<" /> <Button android:layout_gravity="right|center_vertical" android:layout_width="wrap_content" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:text=">" /> </FrameLayout> But in my situation, I need to do it through Java code, because I'll implement another layout views dinamically. To avoid merging xml layout with Java code, I would prefer make all layout using Java. Can you help me? Thanks. André Leitão

    Read the article

  • Android : changing Locale within the app itself

    - by Hubert
    My users can change the Locale within the app (they may want to keep their phone settings in English but read the content of my app in French, Dutch or any other language ...) Why is this working perfectly fine in 1.5/1.6 but NOT in 2.0 anymore ??? @Override public boolean onOptionsItemSelected(MenuItem item) { switch(item.getItemId()){ case 201: Locale locale2 = new Locale("fr"); Locale.setDefault(locale2); Configuration config2 = new Configuration(); config2.locale = locale2; getBaseContext().getResources().updateConfiguration(config2, getBaseContext().getResources().getDisplayMetrics()); // loading data ... refresh(); // refresh the tabs and their content refresh_Tab (); break; case 201: etc... The problem is that the MENU "shrinks" more and more everytime the user is going through the lines of code above ... This is the Menu that gets shrunk: @Override public boolean onCreateOptionsMenu(Menu menu) { menu.add(0, 100, 1, "REFRESH").setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_compass); SubMenu langMenu = menu.addSubMenu(0, 200, 2, "NL-FR").setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_rotate); langMenu.add(1, 201, 0, "Nederlands"); langMenu.add(1, 202, 0, "Français"); menu.add(0, 250, 4, R.string.OptionMenu2).setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_send); menu.add(0, 300, 5, R.string.OptionMenu3).setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_preferences); menu.add(0, 350, 3, R.string.OptionMenu4).setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_more); menu.add(0, 400, 6, "Exit").setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_delete); return super.onCreateOptionsMenu(menu); } What should I do in API Level 5 to make this work again ? HERE IS THE FULL CODE IF YOU WANT TO TEST THIS : import java.util.Locale; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.res.Configuration; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.Menu; import android.view.MenuItem; import android.view.SubMenu; import android.widget.Toast; public class Main extends Activity { /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); } @Override public boolean onCreateOptionsMenu(Menu menu) { SubMenu langMenu = menu.addSubMenu(0, 200, 2, "NL-FR").setIcon(android.R.drawable.ic_menu_rotate); langMenu.add(1, 201, 0, "Nederlands"); langMenu.add(1, 202, 0, "Français"); return super.onCreateOptionsMenu(menu); } @Override public boolean onOptionsItemSelected(MenuItem item) { switch(item.getItemId()){ case 201: Locale locale = new Locale("nl"); Locale.setDefault(locale); Configuration config = new Configuration(); config.locale = locale; getBaseContext().getResources().updateConfiguration(config, getBaseContext().getResources().getDisplayMetrics()); Toast.makeText(this, "Locale in Nederlands !", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); break; case 202: Locale locale2 = new Locale("fr"); Locale.setDefault(locale2); Configuration config2 = new Configuration(); config2.locale = locale2; getBaseContext().getResources().updateConfiguration(config2, getBaseContext().getResources().getDisplayMetrics()); Toast.makeText(this, "Locale en Français !", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); break; } return super.onOptionsItemSelected(item); } } AND HERE IS THE MANIFEST : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" package="com.cousinHub.ChangeLocale" android:versionCode="1" android:versionName="1.0"> <application android:icon="@drawable/icon" android:label="@string/app_name"> <activity android:name=".Main" android:label="@string/app_name"> <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> </application> <uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="3" /> </manifest> THIS IS WHAT I FOUND : <uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="5" /> = IT WORKS JUST FINE ... <uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="3" /> = Menu shrinks every time you change the locale !!! as I want to keep my application accessible for users on 1.5, what should I do ??

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >