Search Results

Search found 9920 results on 397 pages for 'ruby prof'.

Page 296/397 | < Previous Page | 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303  | Next Page >

• Authlogic's current_user object in models

  - by jriff

  Hi all! I need to know the ID of the current user in a model: def after_save desc, points=nil, nil if answer_index == daily_question.correct_answer_index desc = I18n.t('daily_question.point_log.description.correct') points=daily_question.points else desc = I18n.t('daily_question.point_log.description.incorrect') end current_user.give_points(:description => desc, :points => points ) end But I guess that is not how it is done? Regards, Jacob

  Read the article

• Rails 2.3.5 with rails_xss escaping content_for yielded content

  - by DEfusion

  Just upgraded Rails to 2.3.5 to get the lovely looking rails_xss plugin but I've noticed one big issue with it. Any content_for blocks are escaped when yielded. I've tried hacking it around by doing the either of following but they do not work: <% @content_for_foo.html_safe! -%> <%= yield raw :foo %>

  Read the article

• Watir question regarding table rows and loop

  - by AJ

  Hi, I would like to go through a table and look for a word, if that word appears, i would like to click on a radio button in the same row, but not the same column, then stop the loop. I have something like this at the moment but i dont know where to go on from here. @ie.div(:class, 'tableclass').table(:index, 1).each do | row | row.each do | cell | if (cell.text() == 'text') ##Set radio button break end end end I tried selecting a radio by name and index, but i do not know how to get the row number that it is currently at. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Phonegap ( + rails ) basic sample app for profile listing, browsing?

  - by Rubytastic

  Im looking for a sample or tutorial to get started with phonegap. Im building a profile site and want the profiles to be listed in phonegap This is the functionality I look for: Basic login and with autentication in our rails app After login a listing of all profiles getting data from the rails app and display this inside phonegap Listing of profiles with basic search What would be the best and quickest way to get this functionality up and running? Is there some best practice on using rails and phonegap? If anyone knows a tutorial or sample app like described above please let know! Thanks!

  Read the article

• Using ActiveRecord caching library in Heroku

  - by zetarun

  Hi all, I'm studying how to use caching in Heroku for my Rails app. HTTP cache powered by Varnish is superb and I'll use it in all pages without user info but I also want to use a kind of ActiveRecord caching with Memcached using "high livel" plugins such as cache_fu or cache-money...but it seems that Heroku supports only the memcached gem (http://docs.heroku.com/memcache) and it's a very low level Memcachad API... Do you have any other solutions? Thx.

  Read the article

• Storing an encrypted cookie with Rails

  - by J. Pablo Fernández

  I need to store a small piece of data (less than 10 characters) in a cookie in Rails and I need it to be secure. I don't want anybody being able to read that piece of data or injecting their own piece of data (as that would open up the app to many kinds of attacks). I think encrypting the contents of the cookie is the way to go (should I also sign it?). What is the best way to do it? Right now I'm doing this, which looks secure, but many things looked secure to people that knew much more than I about security and then it was discovered it wasn't really secure. I'm saving the secret in this way: encryptor = ActiveSupport::MessageEncryptor.new(Example::Application.config.secret_token) cookies[:secret] = { :value => encryptor.encrypt(secret), :domain => "example.com", :secure => !(Rails.env.test? || Rails.env.development?) } and then I'm reading it like this: encryptor = ActiveSupport::MessageEncryptor.new(Example::Application.config.secret_token) secret = encryptor.decrypt(cookies[:secret]) Is that secure? Any better ways of doing it? Update: I know about Rails' session and how it is secure, both by signing the cookie and by optionally storing the contents of the session server side and I do use the session for what it is for. But my question here is about storing a cookie, a piece of information I do not want in the session but I still need it to be secure.

  Read the article

• Deploying to Heroku with sensitive setting information

  - by TK

  I'm using GitHub for code and Heroku for the deployment platform for my rails app. I don't want to have sensitive data under Git. Such data include database file settings (database.yml) and some other files that have secret API keys. When I deploy to heroku, how can I deal with files that are not under revision control. When I use Capistrano, I can write some hook methods, but I don't know what to do with Heroku.

  Read the article

• Setting up restful routes as a total newb

  - by Trip

  I'm getting the following error: Unknown action No action responded to show. Actions: activate, destroy, index, org_deals, search, and suspend Controller: class Admin::HomepagesController < Admin::ApplicationController def org_deals @organization = Organization.find(:all) end Routes: admin.resources :organizations, :collection => {:search => :get}, :member => {:suspend => :get, :activate => :get} To note: This is a controller inside of a controller. Any ideas why this is?

  Read the article

• How to efficiently implement a blocking call with Rails, while letting the client wait for the reply

  - by Kyle Heironimus

  We have a web service written in Rails. The API is published and we cannot change it. Our app communicates with a remote web service that sometimes hangs or takes several seconds to reply. Client -> Our Web Service -> Remote Web Service Currently, if the remote web service hangs for 5 seconds, one of our rails processes on our web service also hangs with it, which is what we need to avoid. I've seen things such as mod-x-sendfile, modporter, and delayed jobs, but the best I can tell, they all assume the client is not waiting for an answer. Since the API is already established, we cannot tell the client "I'm attempting to do what you want, check back later for the answer." The best option we have come up with so far is to add a second, non-rails web server running eventmachine to process these particular calls. Is there a better way?

  Read the article

• Rails Application Hosting

  - by deb

  Where do you host your rails applications? I've tried Heroku (shared) and Slicehost (dedicated). I thought I would ask you, the knowledgeable guys here at stack-overflow, for hosting recommendations. Thanks in advance -- Deb

  Read the article

• All permissions with declarative_authorization

  - by pablorc

  Hi, I have a Rails application using Restful authentication and declarative authorization. I have some roles with an admin. Is there any method to have automatically granted all permissions to this role, instead of hardcode every controller in the authorization_rules? Something like: role :admin do has_permission_on :everything, :to => :manage end Or a uglier approach with introspection, maybe? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• 1-st level routes for multiple resources in Rails

  - by Leonid Shevtsov

  I have a simple SEO task. There's a City model and a Brand model, and I have to create 1st-level URLs for both (e.g. site.com/honda and site.com/boston). What's the preferred routing/controller combination to do this in Rails? I can only think of map.connect '/:id', :controller => 'catchall', :action => 'index' class CatchallController < ApplicationController def index if City.exists?(:slug => params[:id]) @city = City.find_by_slug!(params[:id]) render 'cities/show' else @brand = Brand.find_by_slug!(params[:id]) render 'brands/show' end end end but it seems to be very un-Rails to put such logic into the controller. (Obviously I need to make sure that the slugs don't overlap in the models, that's done).

  Read the article

• catching the value of a time_select in rails.

  - by ZeroSoul13

  Hello, I have a form that has two field (time_selects), the idea is that the user can select the beginning of a call and end time of the call. I've setup a observe field and works fine: <%= observe_field "llamada_inicio_4i", :update => "total", :with => "llamada_inicio_4i", :url => { :controller => "llamadas", :action => "time_tracker"}%> Sends the value out: Processing LlamadasController#time_tracker (for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-04-22 17:48:41) [POST] Parameters:"llamada_inicio_4i"="23",authenticity_token"="+D+yPSVue6yQNfPMuVLkrJn7B9tP6z5S1icKpPFTiso="} Rendering template within layouts/llamadas Rendering llamadas/time_tracker Completed in 5ms (View: 3, DB: 0) | 200 OK [http://0.0.0.0/llamadas /time_tracker] How can i catch this value Parameters:"llamada_inicio_4i"="23"

  Read the article

• rails 3 actionmailer cannot send email

  - by lkahtz

  I am following Ryan Bates's tutorial on Rails 3 ActionMailer. I generate the mailer in terminal and then establish a setup_mail.rb under config/initializers. I keyed in the following code: ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings={ :address => "smtp.gmail.com", :port => 587, :domail => "gmail.com", :user_name => "my_account_at_gmail", :password => "my_password", :authentication => "plain" , :enable_starttls_auto => true } My user_mailer.rb file goes like: class UserMailer < ActionMailer::Base default :from => "[email protected]" def registration_confirmation(user) mail(:to => user.email,:subject => "registered") end end I tested in rails console: u=User.first UserMailer.registration_confirmation(u).deliver it displays: #<Mail::Message:2194479560, Multipart: false, Headers: <Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:42:06 +0800>, <From: [email protected]>, <To: [email protected]>, <Message-ID: <[email protected]>>, <Subject: registered>, <Mime-Version: 1.0>, <Content-Type: text/plain>, <Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit>> BUT I never received the email here... Why? How can I solve this? I guess it is some problem on send_mail.rb file..

  Read the article

• Problem with Devise authentication on Rails

  - by Jiang

  Hi all, I tried to use Devise 1.0.6 over Rails 2.3. I followed the installation instructions and the user can successfully sign up. However, when I use the registered user account to sign in, the password field is cleared up and nothing happened. Could anyone give me some ideas? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• rails: undefined method and form_tags

  - by SuperString

  I have this in courses.html.erb under app/views/students <% if @student.courses.count < Course.count then%> <% form_tag(course_add_student_path(@student)) do%> <%= select_tag(:course, options_from_collection_for_select(@student.unenrolled_courses, :id, :name))%> <%= submit_tag 'Enroll'%> <%end%> <%else%> <p><%=h @student.name%> is enrolled in every course. </p> <%end%> I have this in my students_controller.rb under app/controllers: def course_add @student = Student.find(params[:id]) @course = Course.find(params[:course]) unless @student.enrolled_in?(@course) @student.coursess << @course flash[:notice] = 'course added' else flash[:error] = 'course already enrolled' end redirect_to :action => courses, :id => @student end And in my routes.rb, I have: resources :students, :has_many => [:awards], :member => {:courses => :get, :course_add => :post, :course_remove => :post} However, I am getting this error: undefined method `course_add_student_path' for #<#<Class:0x105321d78>:0x1053200e0> What am I missing here? Rake routes output: students GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} new_student GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} edit_student GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} student GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"} courses GET /courses(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"courses"} POST /courses(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"courses"} new_course GET /courses/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"courses"} edit_course GET /courses/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"courses"} course GET /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"courses"} PUT /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"courses"} DELETE /courses/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"courses"} student_awards GET /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"awards"} POST /students/:student_id/awards(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"awards"} new_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"awards"} edit_student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"awards"} student_award GET /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"awards"} PUT /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"awards"} DELETE /students/:student_id/awards/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"awards"} courses_student GET /students/:id/courses(.:format) {:action=>"courses", :controller=>"students"} GET /students(.:format) {:action=>"index", :controller=>"students"} POST /students(.:format) {:action=>"create", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/new(.:format) {:action=>"new", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id/edit(.:format) {:action=>"edit", :controller=>"students"} GET /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"show", :controller=>"students"} PUT /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"update", :controller=>"students"} DELETE /students/:id(.:format) {:action=>"destroy", :controller=>"students"}

  Read the article

• How to verify that "puts" has been called with a certain message?

  - by soulnafein

  Hello there. I'm trying to make this test fail :) it "should display the question" do @ui.should_receive(:puts).with("What's your name?").once @ui.ask_question("What's your name?") end At the moment it passes even if I don't call puts in my function.

  Read the article

• What is the most accepted way to implement a SOAP service in Rails 2.3?

  - by Michelle Six

  datanoise-actionwebservice was what I used last time I needed one. What is current opinion on SOAP and Rails?

  Read the article

• Rails Functional Test Failing Due to Association

  - by Koby

  I have an accounts model that holds some basic account info (account name, website, etc). I then have a user model that has the following in the app/models/user.rb belongs_to :account I also have the following in my routes.rb map.resources :account, :has_many => [:users, :othermodel] the problem I'm facing is that the following test is failing: test "should create user" do assert_difference('User.count') do post :create, :user => { } #this is the line it's actually failing on end assert_redirected_to user_path(assigns(:user)) #it doesn't get here yet end The error it gives is "Can't find Account without ID" so I kind of understand WHY it's failing, because of the fact that it doesn't have the account object (or account_id as it were) to know under what account to create the user. I have tried variations of the following but I am completely lost: post :create, :user => { accounts(:one) } #I have the 'fixtures :accounts' syntax at the top of the test class post :create, [accounts(:one), :user] => { } post :create, :user => { accounts(:one), #other params for :user } and like I said, just about every variation I could think of. I can't find much documentation on doing this and this might be why people have moved to Factories for doing test data, but I want to understand things that come standard in Rails before moving onto other things. Can anyone help me get this working?

  Read the article

• Using build with a has_one association in rails.

  - by espinet

  This is a really noob question but im having trouble finding the answer, is there a way in rails to have 0 or 1 association? For example, I create a user with no objects, than later on create an object for that user. I tried using build with a 'has_one' association but that blew up... The only way I see this working is using 'has_many'. The user is suppose to only have at most one of these objects, is there any way to do this?

  Read the article

• How to make activerecord use a field generated on the fly by find_by_sql

  - by Tam

  I'm using find_by_sql with Activerecord which I generate another field there that doesn't in the original table as a combination of different fields like: select (field1 + field2) as new_field_name If I try to access the newly generated field like: @user.new_field_name I get nothing! How do you suggest I should approach this problem

  Read the article

• Can I run our tests using redgreen without changing our source code?

  - by Simon

  I'd like to use redgreen (or similar) to colour the output of our tests, but I don't want to force it on everyone else. Is there a way for me to use it without changing our source code?

  Read the article

• Has anyone succesfully deployed on heroku from a windows platform ?

  - by dakull

  I've been reading all kinds of tutorials on how to deploy rails apps on heroku from windows. I've tried installing git, heroku gem, generating ssh keys and setting paths and everything... I get either public key error (without putty) or fatal no auth found (with putty)...

  Read the article

• Permutation on Rails Routes

  - by Kevin Sylvestre

  I currently have an application that for a set of parameters (location, category, budget, ...) a user can enter a "pretty" URL like: /location/canada/ontario /category/primary /budget/small Resulting in the respective parameters: params[:country] == 'canada' and params[:region] == 'ontario' params[:category] == 'primary' params[:budget] == 'small' I want to allow users to perform searches on multiple parameters at once (with each parameter optional). For example: /location/canada/ontario/category/primary/budget/small I understand that this can be achieved using URL parameters, but for SEO reasons I prefer to add the "pretty" parameters. Is this at all possible without listing all possible combination of routes (I have a large number of search-able fields)? I understand that route "globbing" maybe play a roll, but I am not sure how. Thanks.

  Read the article

• class method as hash value

  - by demas

  I have this working code: class Server def handle(&block) @block = block end def do @block.call end end class Client def initialize @server = Server.new @server.handle { action } end def action puts "some" end def call_server @server.do end end client = Client.new client.call_server My Server will handle more then one action so I want to change code such way: class Server def handle(options) @block = options[:on_filter] end def do @block.call end end class Client def initialize @server = Server.new my_hash = { :on_filter => action } @server.handle(my_hash) end def action puts "some" end def call_server @server.do end end client = Client.new client.call_server It is incorrect code because action() method calls on create my_hash, but if I try to modify code to: my_hash = { :on_filter => { action } } i get error message. Is it possible to create hash with methods as hash values ?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303  | Next Page >