Search Results

Search found 156 results on 7 pages for 'unittest'.

Page 3/7 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  | Next Page >

  • SQLAlchemy: who is in charge of the "session"? ( and how to unit-test with sessions )

    - by Nick Perkins
    I need some guidance on how to use session objects with SQLAlchemy, and how to organize Unit Tests of my mapped objects. What I would like to able to do is something like this: thing = BigThing() # mapped object child = thing.new_child() # create and return a related object thing.save() # will also save the child object In order to achieve this, I was thinking of having the BigThing actually add itself ( and it's children ) to the database -- but maybe this not a good idea? One reason to add objects as soon as possible is Automatic id values that are assigned by the database -- the sooner they are available, the fewer problems there are ( right? ) What is the best way to manage session objects? Who is in charge of the session? Should it be created only when required? or saved for a long time? What about Unit Tests for my mapped objects?...how should the session be handled? Is it ever OK to have mapped objects just automatically add themselves to a database? or is that going to lead to trouble?

    Read the article

  • How to create unit test for actualHeight in Silverlight 4?

    - by eflles
    How can I write a unit test to test the actualWidth property to a userControl in Silverligh 4? I hoped that this method would pass, but it fails. I am using the Silverlight ToolKit april 2010, and VS 2010. <TestMethod()> _ Public Sub TestAcrtualWidth() Me.MyUserControl.Width = 100 Me.MyUserControl.UpdateLayout() Assert.IsTrue(Me.MyUserControl.ActualWidth > 0) End Sub

    Read the article

  • How do I test expectedExceptionsMessageRegExp (exception message) using TestNG?

    - by Thomman
    I'm using expectedExceptionsMessageRegExp annotation to test exception message, but the this is not executing correctly.please see the below code. Unit Test code: @Test (dependsOnMethods = "test1", expectedExceptions = IllegalArgumentException.class , expectedExceptionsMessageRegExp = "incorrect argument") public void testConverter() { try { currencyConverter = Converter.convert(val1,val2) } catch (MYException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } Application code: if (val1 == null || val1.length() == 0) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Val1 is incorrect"); } The unit test code should check the exception message , if both message are not matching , it should throw fail (unit test failed) . At present this is not happening , Am i doing something wrong?

    Read the article

  • Why cant we use UIFont or UIcolor in the method which we unit test?

    - by PrithviRaj
    Hi all, I have an method in the tableview controller class. It consists few of the UIColor and UIFont class names. I am unit testing that metohd. But when i build that test target i am getting this error: "/Developer/Tools/RunPlatformUnitTests.include:451:0 Test rig '/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneSimulator3.0.sdk/Developer/usr/bin/otest' exited abnormally with code 133 (it may have crashed)." Any idea about this? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Python unittest (using SQLAlchemy) does not write/update database?

    - by Jerry
    Hi, I am puzzled at why my Python unittest runs perfectly fine without actually updating the database. I can even see the SQL statements from SQLAlchemy and step through the newly created user object's email -- ...INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine.0x...954c INSERT INTO users (user_id, user_name, email, ...) VALUES (%(user_id)s, %(user_name)s, %(email)s, ...) ...INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine.0x...954c {'user_id': u'4cfdafe3f46544e1b4ad0c7fccdbe24a', 'email': u'[email protected]', ...} > .../tests/unit_tests/test_signup.py(127)test_signup_success() -> user = user_q.filter_by(user_name='test').first() (Pdb) n ...INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine.0x...954c SELECT users.user_id AS users_user_id, ... FROM users WHERE users.user_name = %(user_name_1)s LIMIT 1 OFFSET 0 ...INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine.0x...954c {'user_name_1': 'test'} > .../tests/unit_tests/test_signup.py(128)test_signup_success() -> self.assertTrue(isinstance(user, model.User)) (Pdb) user <pweb.models.User object at 0x9c95b0c> (Pdb) user.email u'[email protected]' Yet at the same time when I login to the test database, I do not see the new record there. Is it some feature from Python/unittest/SQLAlchemy/Pyramid/PostgreSQL that I'm totally unaware of? Thanks. Jerry

    Read the article

  • How do I make the manifest available during a Maven/Surefire unittest run "mvn test" ?

    - by Ernst de Haan
    How do I make the manifest available during a Maven/Surefire unittest run "mvn test" ? I have an open-source project that I am converting from Ant to Maven, including its unit tests. Here's the project source repository with the Maven project: http://github.com/znerd/logdoc My question pertains to the primary module, called "base". This module has a unit test that tests the behaviour of the static method getVersion() in the class org.znerd.logdoc.Library. This method returns: Library.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion() The getImplementationVersion() method returns a value of a setting in the manifest file. So far, so good. I have tested this in the past and it works well, as long as the manifest is indeed available on the classpath at the path META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (either on the file system or inside a JAR file). Now my challenge is that the manifest file is not available when I run the unit tests: mvn test Surefire runs the unit tests, but my unit test fails with a mesage indicating that Library.getVersion() returned null. When I want to check the JAR, I find that it has not even been generated. Maven/Surefire runs the unit tests against the classes, before the resources are added to the classpath. So can I either run the unit tests against the JAR (implicitly requiring the JAR to be generated first) or can I make sure the resources (including the manifest file) are generated/copied under target/classes before the unit tests are run? Note that I use Maven 2.2.0, Java 1.6.0_17 on Mac OS X 10.6.2, with JUnit 4.8.1.

    Read the article

  • Using MSBuild, how to construct a dynamic string from iterating over files in an ItemGroup?

    - by RyBolt
    I need to create multiple /testcontainer: parameters to feed into a task that exec's MsTest. I have the following : <ItemGroup> <TestFiles Include="$(ProjectPath)\**\UnitTest.*.dll" /> </ItemGroup> for each match in TestFiles I would like to build a string like so: "/testcontainer:UnitTest.SomeLibrary1.dll" "/testcontainer:UnitTest.SomeLibrary2.dll" "/testcontainer:UnitTest.SomeLibrary3.dll" I am trying to use the internals of MSBuild without having to create a custom task, is this possible ? TIA

    Read the article

  • How to run a single test method in simpletest unittest class ?

    - by shikhar
    This is my Unit Test class <? require_once '../simpletest/unit_tester.php'; require_once '../simpletest/reporter.php'; class Academic extends UnitTestCase { function setUp() { } function tearDown() { } function testAc1() { } function testAc4() { } function testAc7() { } } $test = new Academic(); $test->run(new HtmlReporter()); ?> When I run this script all methods viz., testAc1, testAc4, testAc7 etc are run. Is there a way to execute just a single method ? Thanks, Shikhar

    Read the article

  • Unittest in Django. Static variable feeded into the test case

    - by ziang
    I want to generate some dynamic data and feed these data in to test cases. But I found that Django will initial the test class every time to do the test. So the data will get generated every time django test framework calls the function. Is there anyway to use something like the singleton or static variable to solve the problem? What should be the solution? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Django FileField not saving to upload_to location

    - by Erik
    I have an Attachment model that has a FileField in a Django 1.4.1 app. This FileField has a callable upload_to parameter which, per the Django docs should be called when the form (and therefore the model) is saved. When I run FormTest below, the upload_to callable is never called and the file therefore does not appear in the location provided by the upload_to method. What am I doing wrong? Notice that in the passing tests in ModelTest (also below), the upload_to method works as expected. Test: from core.forms.attachments import AttachmentForm from django.test import TestCase import unittest from django.core.files.uploadedfile import SimpleUploadedFile from django.core.files.storage import default_storage def suite(): return unittest.TestSuite( [ unittest.TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(FormTest), ] ) class FormTest(TestCase): def test_form_1(self): filename = 'filename' f = file(filename) data = {'name':'name',} file_data = {'attachment_file':SimpleUploadedFile(f.name,f.read()),} form = AttachmentForm(data=data,files=file_data) self.assertTrue(form.is_valid()) attachment = form.save() root_directory = 'attachments' upload_location = root_directory + '/' + attachment.directory + '/' + filename self.assertTrue(attachment.attachment_file) # Fails self.assertTrue(default_storage.exists(upload_location)) # Fails Attachment Model: from django.db import models from parent_mixins import Parent_Mixin import uuid from django.db.models.signals import pre_delete,pre_save from dirtyfields import DirtyFieldsMixin def upload_to(instance,filename): return 'attachments/' + instance.directory + '/' + filename def uuid_directory_name(): return uuid.uuid4().hex class Attachment(DirtyFieldsMixin,Parent_Mixin,models.Model): attachment_file = models.FileField(blank=True,null=True,upload_to=upload_to) directory = models.CharField(blank=False,default=uuid_directory_name,null=False,max_length=32) name = models.CharField(blank=False,default=None,null=False,max_length=128) class Meta: app_label = 'core' def __str__(self): return unicode(self).encode('utf-8') def __unicode__(self): return unicode(self.name) @models.permalink def get_absolute_url(self): return('core_attachments_update',(),{'pk': self.pk}) # def save(self,*args,**kwargs): # super(Attachment,self).save(*args,**kwargs) def pre_delete_callback(sender, instance, *args, **kwargs): if not isinstance(instance, Attachment): return if not instance.attachment_file: return instance.attachment_file.delete(save=False) def pre_save_callback(sender, instance, *args, **kwargs): if not isinstance(instance, Attachment): return if not instance.attachment_file: return if instance.is_dirty(): dirty_fields = instance.get_dirty_fields() if 'attachment_file' in dirty_fields: old_attachment_file = dirty_fields['attachment_file'] old_attachment_file.delete() pre_delete.connect(pre_delete_callback) pre_save.connect(pre_save_callback) Attachment Form: from ..models.attachments import Attachment from crispy_forms.helper import FormHelper from crispy_forms.layout import Div,Layout,HTML,Field,Fieldset,Button,ButtonHolder,Submit from django import forms class AttachmentFormHelper(FormHelper): form_tag=False layout = Layout( Div( Div( Field('name',css_class='span4'), Field('attachment_file',css_class='span4'), css_class='span4', ), css_class='row', ), ) class AttachmentForm(forms.ModelForm): helper = AttachmentFormHelper() class Meta: fields=('attachment_file','name') model = Attachment class AttachmentInlineFormHelper(FormHelper): form_tag=False form_style='inline' layout = Layout( Div( Div( Field('name',css_class='span4'), Field('attachment_file',css_class='span4'), Field('DELETE',css_class='span4'), css_class='span4', ), css_class='row', ), ) class AttachmentInlineForm(forms.ModelForm): helper = AttachmentInlineFormHelper() class Meta: fields=('attachment_file','name') model = Attachment UPDATE I also do testing on the Attachment model class with these unit tests -- which all pass: from core.models.attachments import Attachment from core.models.attachments import upload_to from django.test import TestCase import unittest from django.core.files.storage import default_storage from django.core.files.base import ContentFile def suite(): return unittest.TestSuite( [ unittest.TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(ModelTest), ] ) class ModelTest(TestCase): def test_model_minimum_fields(self): attachment = Attachment(name='name') attachment.attachment_file.save('test.txt',ContentFile("hello world")) attachment.save() self.assertEqual(str(attachment),'name') self.assertEqual(unicode(attachment),'name') self.assertTrue(attachment.directory) # def test_model_full_fields(self): # attachment = Attachment() # attachement.save() def test_file_operations_basic(self): root_directory = 'attachments' filename = 'test.txt' attachment = Attachment(name='name') attachment.attachment_file.save(filename,ContentFile('test')) attachment.save() upload_location = root_directory + '/' + attachment.directory + '/' + filename self.assertEqual(upload_to(attachment,filename),upload_location) self.assertTrue(default_storage.exists(upload_location)) def test_file_operations_delete(self): root_directory = 'attachments' filename = 'test.txt' attachment = Attachment(name='name') attachment.attachment_file.save(filename,ContentFile('test')) attachment.save() upload_location = upload_to(attachment,filename) attachment.delete() self.assertFalse(default_storage.exists(upload_location)) def test_file_operations_change(self): root_directory = 'attachments' filename_1 = 'test_1.txt' attachment = Attachment(name='name') attachment.attachment_file.save(filename_1,ContentFile('test')) attachment.save() upload_location_1 = upload_to(attachment,filename_1) self.assertTrue(default_storage.exists(upload_location_1)) filename_2 = 'test_2.txt' attachment.attachment_file.save(filename_2,ContentFile('test')) attachment.save() upload_location_2 = upload_to(attachment,filename_2) self.assertTrue(default_storage.exists(upload_location_2)) self.assertFalse(default_storage.exists(upload_location_1))

    Read the article

  • Getting Unit Tests to work with Komodo IDE for Python

    - by devoured elysium
    I've tried to run the following code on Komodo IDE (for python): import unittest class MathLibraryTests(unittest.TestCase): def test1Plus1Equals2(self): self.assertEqual(1+1, 2) Then, I created a new test plan, pointing to this project(file) directory and tried to run it the test plan. It seems to run but it doesn't seem to find any tests. If I try to run the following code with the "regular" run command (F7) class MathLibraryTests(unittest.TestCase): def testPlus1Equals2(self): self.assertEqual(1+1, 2) if __name__ == "__main__": unittest.main() it works. I get the following output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 1 test in 0.000s OK What might I be doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Are Python properties broken?

    - by jacob
    How can it be that this test case import unittest class PropTest(unittest.TestCase): def test(self): class C(): val = 'initial val' def get_p(self): return self.val def set_p(self, prop): if prop == 'legal val': self.val = prop prop=property(fget=get_p, fset=set_p) c=C() self.assertEqual('initial val', c.prop) c.prop='legal val' self.assertEqual('legal val', c.prop) c.prop='illegal val' self.assertNotEqual('illegal val', c.prop) fails as below? Failure Traceback (most recent call last): File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 279, in run testMethod() File "/Users/jacob/aau/admissions_proj/admissions/plain_old_unit_tests.py", line 24, in test self.assertNotEqual('illegal val', c.prop) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 358, in failIfEqual (msg or '%r == %r' % (first, second)) AssertionError: 'illegal val' == 'illegal val'

    Read the article

  • Is there a recommended command for "hg bisect --command"?

    - by blokeley
    I have an emergent bug that I've got to track down tomorrow. I know a previous hg revision which was good so I'm thinking about using hg bisect. However, I'm on Windows and don't want to get into DOS scripting. Ideally, I'd be able to write a Python unit test and have hg bisect use that. This is my first attempt. bisector.py #!/usr/bin/env python import sys import unittest class TestCase(unittest.TestCase): def test(self): #raise Exception('Exception for testing.') #self.fail("Failure for testing.") pass def main(): suite = unittest.defaultTestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase(TestCase) result = unittest.TestResult() suite.run(result) if result.errors: # Skip the revision return 125 if result.wasSuccessful(): return 0 else: return 1 if '__main__' == __name__: sys.exit(main()) Perhaps I could then run: hg bisect --reset hg bisect --bad hg bisect --good -r 1 hg bisect --command=bisector.py Is there a better way of doing it? Thanks for any advice.

    Read the article

  • Size doesn't matter

    - by ssoolsma
    Whenever I start a new project I *always* break up my code in different projects. Also known as n-tier solution. The scale of  the project doesn't matter, but make sure that each project is responsible for himself (or herself if you prefer). I make sure that i ....At least thought about how the project should work on the toilet or in a project team meeting.Have a solution directory and create my projects within. I like to name my project (and it's folders by the namespaces). For instance: When i'm creating a piece of (web)software called: ChuckNorris, i always include the software name in my projects. Start off with designing the DataAccess project. I name it: ChuckNorris.DataAccess which lets me easily identify the project incase the project scales alot.Build the classes which represent the database structure. Don't stop working on a class untill it's finished for now. Also, don't over-do the methods. Build stuff only when it's needed, and not think: "Hm, that would be cool to have". Cause most of the time you end up with unused code, and we don't want that.Build a unittest project and make sure you create the folder inside the project that it's testing. So, create the ChuckNorris.DataAccess.UnitTest project inside the folder of the dataaccess project. I would suggest using the nUnit testframework.Incase you though, hm i skip unittest: Don't! Just build it - it will safe you alot of time later onNow, read 5 again. Build that bloody unittest. Don't skip. (i cant emphasize this enough)Now, every class in the dataaccess project is responsible for itself. They don't rely on each other. This is where we use the BusinessLogic project for. Start creating the ChuckNorris.BusinessLogic project. (not inside the data-access project ofcourse, but withing the ChuckNorris folder.Combine stuff from data-access. This usual involves alot of copying the data-access classes and feels silly at first. (we'll get to that later on)Now you come up to a point of creating a service project. You might not always see why to use it, but see it as a way to expose your businesslogic to any application (including your own). Sometimes i use it as a so-called "Factory". Every call goes through this factory, so that's the only thing i'm exposing to any program, and make sure that those methods are the only ones that I allow you to invoke.Build any UI (website, phoneapp, forms application, silverlight, wpf or whatever) and reference it to you service project. Fall in love (cough) with this approach.It's possible that it doesn't seem to make much sense, and very incomplete. Well, that last part is correct. Next post will go in to detail of setting up your Data-Access project and use the entity framework.

    Read the article

  • "import numpy" tries to load my own package

    - by Sebastian
    I have a python (2.7) project containing my own packages util and operator (and so forth). I read about relative imports, but perhaps I didn't understand. I have the following directory structure: top-dir/ util/__init__.py (empty) util/ua.py util/ub.py operator/__init__.py ... test/test1.py The test1.py file contains #!/usr/bin/env python2 from __future__ import absolute_import # removing this line dosn't change anything. It's default functionality in python2.7 I guess import numpy as np It's fine when I execute test1.py inside the test/ folder. But when I move to the top-dir/ the import numpy wants to include my own util package: Traceback (most recent call last): File "tests/laplace_2d_square.py", line 4, in <module> import numpy as np File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 137, in <module> import add_newdocs File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py", line 9, in <module> from numpy.lib import add_newdoc File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py", line 4, in <module> from type_check import * File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/type_check.py", line 8, in <module> import numpy.core.numeric as _nx File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/__init__.py", line 45, in <module> from numpy.testing import Tester File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/testing/__init__.py", line 8, in <module> from unittest import TestCase File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/__init__.py", line 58, in <module> from .result import TestResult File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/result.py", line 9, in <module> from . import util File "/usr/lib/python2.7/unittest/util.py", line 2, in <module> from collections import namedtuple, OrderedDict File "/usr/lib/python2.7/collections.py", line 9, in <module> from operator import itemgetter as _itemgetter, eq as _eq ImportError: cannot import name itemgetter The troublesome line is either from . import util or perhaps from operator import itemgetter as _itemgetter, eq as _eq What can I do?

    Read the article

  • Why is the destructor called when the CPython garbage collector is disabled?

    - by Frederik
    I'm trying to understand the internals of the CPython garbage collector, specifically when the destructor is called. So far, the behavior is intuitive, but the following case trips me up: Disable the GC. Create an object, then remove a reference to it. The object is destroyed and the __del__ method is called. I thought this would only happen if the garbage collector was enabled. Can someone explain why this happens? Is there a way to defer calling the destructor? import gc import unittest _destroyed = False class MyClass(object): def __del__(self): global _destroyed _destroyed = True class GarbageCollectionTest(unittest.TestCase): def testExplicitGarbageCollection(self): gc.disable() ref = MyClass() ref = None # The next test fails. # The object is automatically destroyed even with the collector turned off. self.assertFalse(_destroyed) gc.collect() self.assertTrue(_destroyed) if __name__=='__main__': unittest.main() Disclaimer: this code is not meant for production -- I've already noted that this is very implementation-specific and does not work on Jython.

    Read the article

  • Sending object C from class A to class B

    - by user278618
    Hi, I can't figure out how to design classes in my system. In classA I create object selenium (it simulates user actions at website). In this ClassA I create another objects like SearchScreen, Payment_Screen and Summary_Screen. # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from selenium import selenium import unittest, time, re class OurSiteTestCases(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.verificationErrors = [] self.selenium = selenium("localhost", 5555, "*chrome", "http://www.someaddress.com/") time.sleep(5) self.selenium.start() def test_buy_coffee(self): sel = self.selenium sel.open('/') sel.window_maximize() search_screen=SearchScreen(self.selenium) search_screen.choose('lavazza') payment_screen=PaymentScreen(self.selenium) payment_screen.fill_test_data() summary_screen=SummaryScreen(selenium) summary_screen.accept() def tearDown(self): self.selenium.stop() self.assertEqual([], self.verificationErrors) if __name__ == "__main__": unittest.main() It's example SearchScreen module: class SearchScreen: def __init__(self,selenium): self.selenium=selenium def search(self): self.selenium.click('css=button.search') I want to know if there is anything ok with a design of those classes?

    Read the article

  • python - selenium script syntax error

    - by William Hawkes
    Okay, I used selenium to test some automation, which I got to work. I did an export of the script for python. When I tried to run the python script it generated, it gave me a "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" error message. Here's the python script in question: from selenium import selenium import unittest, time, re class WakeupCall(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.verificationErrors = [] self.selenium = selenium("localhost", 4444, "*chrome", "http://the.web.site") self.selenium.start() def test_wakeup_call(self): sel = self.selenium sel.open("/index.php#deposit") sel.wait_for_page_to_load("30000") sel.click("link=History") sel.wait_for_page_to_load("30000") try: self.failUnless(sel.is_text_present("key phrase number 1.")) except AssertionError, e: self.verificationErrors.append(str(e)) The last line is what generated the "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" error message. A "^" was under the comma. The rest of the script goes as follows: def tearDown(self): self.selenium.stop() self.assertEqual([], self.verificationErrors) if name == "main": unittest.main()

    Read the article

  • Howto install google-mock on Ubuntu 12.10

    - by user1459339
    I am having hard time trying to install Google C++ Mocking Framework. I have successfully run sudo apt-get install google-mock. Then I tried to compile this sample file #include "gmock/gmock.h" int main(int argc, char** argv) { ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); } with g++ -lgmock main.cpp and these errors have shown main.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `testing::InitGoogleMock(int*, char**)' main.cpp:(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()' main.cpp:(.text+0x2b): undefined reference to `testing::UnitTest::Run()' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I guess the linker can not find the library files. Does anybody know how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • Unit testing in Web2py

    - by Wraith
    I'm following the instructions from this post but cannot get my methods recognized globally. The error message: ERROR: test_suggest_performer (__builtin__.TestSearch) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "applications/myapp/tests/test_search.py", line 24, in test_suggest_performer suggs = suggest_flavors("straw") NameError: global name 'suggest_flavors' is not defined My test file: import unittest from gluon.globals import Request db = test_db execfile("applications/myapp/controllers/search.py", globals()) class TestSearch(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): request = Request() def test_suggest_flavors(self): suggs = suggest_flavors("straw") self.assertEqual(len(suggs), 1) self.assertEqual(suggs[0][1], 'Strawberry') My controller: def suggest_flavors(term): return [] Has anyone successfully completed unit testing like this in web2py?

    Read the article

  • Spec. for JUnit XML Output

    - by Gilad Naor
    Where can I find the specification of JUnit's XML output. My goal is to write a UnitTest++ XML reporter which produced JUnit like output. See: "Unable to get hudson to parse JUnit test output XML" and "http://stackoverflow.com/questions/411218/hudson-c-and-unittest"

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  | Next Page >