Search Results

Search found 36788 results on 1472 pages for 'sql 2008'.

Page 300/1472 | < Previous Page | 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307  | Next Page >

  • Can a DataTemplate be a Page?

    - by dthrasher
    I'm using the MVVM pattern to create a WPF standalone application. My program compiles in Visual Studio 2008, but I frequently get warnings in the editor for my DataTemplates. In my MainWindow.xaml, I've defined the following DataTemplate: <DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type ViewModels:TagViewModel}"> <Views:TagView /> </DataTemplate> Where "TagView" is derived from a Page, rather than an ordinary UserControl. This causes the following message to appear every time I reload the designer in Visual Studio: "Could not create an instance of type 'TagView'. Yet the solution compiles fine and the program seems to work properly. Is this a bug in the Visual Studio 2008 editor? Or am I doing something wrong?

    Read the article

  • Problems with Visual Studio Express installation

    - by matpe
    I just installed 'Visual C# 2008 Express Edition' and 'Visual Web Developer 2008 Express Edition' on my Vista machine. Previously I have been running these in Win XP. When launching the software, starting a new project and trying to build it I get warnings like "The referenced component 'System' could not be found."; one row for each namespace used. I have .NET Framework 3.5 installed and are able to browse through the tabs in 'Add reference', but I cannot make it work. (A re-install did not help.) Is there an easy fix?

    Read the article

  • SQL Get UID when Group by

    - by Quandary
    I do a select from table [V_RPT_BelegungKostenstelleDetail] WHERE SO_UID = '7C7035C8-56DD-4A44-93CC-F16FD66280A3' AND GB_UID = '4FF1B0EE-A5DD-4699-94B7-760922666CE2' AND GS_UID = '1188759A-54E1-4323-8BF2-85E71B3C796E' AND RM_UID = '088C3559-6E6E-468A-9554-6740840FCBA1' AND NA_UID= '96A2A8DB-8C83-4C60-9060-F0F55719AF5C' GROUP BY KST_UID How can I get SO_UID? It is the same everywhere, but I get an error when I try to get SO_UID with the return values... SO_UID is not necessarely given like '7C7035C8-56DD-4A44-93CC-F16FD66280A3' here, so I can't just add it manually as string.

    Read the article

  • How are SQL Server CALs counted?

    - by Sam
    Running a SQL Server, as far as I understand it, you need one CAL for every user who connects to the database server. But what happens if the only computer which is accessing the SQL Server is the server running your business layer? If, for example, you got 1 SQL Server and 1 Business logic server, and 100 Clients who all just query and use the business logic server. No client is using the SQL Server directly, no one is even allowed to contact it. So, since there is only one computer using the SQL server, do I need only 1 CAL??? I somehow can't believe this would count as only 1 CAL needed for the SQL Server, but I would like to know why not.

    Read the article

  • Better way to write this SQL

    - by AngryHacker
    I have the following table: create table ARDebitDetail(ID_ARDebitDetail int identity, ID_Hearing int, ID_AdvancedRatePlan int) I am trying to get the latest ID_AdvancedRatePlan based on a ID_Hearing. By latest I mean with the largest ID_ARDebitDetail. I have this query and it works fine. select ID_AdvancedRatePlan from ARDebitDetails where ID_Hearing = 135878 and ID_ARDebitDetail = ( select max(ID_ARDebitDetail) from ARDebitDetails where ID_AdvancedRatePlan > 0 and ID_Hearing = 135878 ) However, it just looks ugly and smells bad. Is there a way to rewrite it in a more concise manner?

    Read the article

  • How to Select Multiple Records from Multiple Tables at Once - SQL Server/C#/.NET/T-SQL

    - by peace
    I have two tables Customer and CustomerPhone. Customer usually has multiple phone numbers, so when i run select statement on customer 101, i will get multiple records due to the multiple phone numbers. As you see below all the "Phone" and "Fax" field belongs to CustomerPhone table. These are considered as two records in the CustomerPhone table whereas the rest of fields relate to Customer table which is a single record. What should i do to fill Phone and Fax field in this case? Should i run select statement on CustomerPhone first and then run select statement on Customer?

    Read the article

  • UNIQUE Constraints in SQL (MS-SQL)

    - by rockbala
    Why are UNIQUE Constraints needed in database ? Can you provide any examples ? Primary Key is UNIQUE by default... Understandable as they are referred in other tables as Foreign keys... relation is needed to connect them for rdbms platform... but why would one refer to other columns as UNIQUE, what is benefit of doing so ?)

    Read the article

  • Max (SQL-Server)

    - by rah.deex
    Hello everyone. I have a table that looks like this: BARCODE | PRICE | STARTDATE 007023819815 | 159000 | 2008-11-17 00:00:00.000 007023819815 | 319000 | 2009-02-01 00:00:00.000 How can I select so I can get the result like this: BARCODE | PRICE | STARTDATE 007023819815 | 319000 | 2009-02-01 00:00:00.000 select by using max date. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server: How do I delimit this data?

    - by codingguy3000
    declare @mydata nvarchar(4000) set @mydata = '36|0, 77|5, 132|61' I have this data that I need to get into a table. So for Row1 columnA would be 36 and columnB would be 0. For Row2 columnA would be 77 and columnB would be 5 etc. What is the best way to do this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • SQL Server combining 2 rows into 1 from the same table

    - by Maton
    Hi, I have a table with an JobID (PK), EmployeeID (FK), StartDate, EndDate containing data such as: 1, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:00:00', '01-Jan-2010 08:30:00' 2, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:50:00', '01-Jan-2010 09:05:00' 3, 10, '02-Feb-2010 10:00:00', '02-Feb-2010 10:30:00' I want to return a record for each EndDate for a Job and then the same employees StartDate for his next immediate job (by date time). So from the data above the result would be Result 1: 10, 01-Jan-2010 08:30:00, 01-Jan-2010 08:50:00 Result 2: 10, 01-Jan-2010 09:05:00, 02-Feb-2010 10:00:00 Greatly appreciate any help!

    Read the article

  • Retrieving multipel rows in MS SQL but distinct filteringen only on one

    - by Nicklas
    I have this: SELECT Product.ProductID, Product.Name, Product.GroupID, Product.GradeID, AVG(tblReview.Grade) AS Grade FROM Product left Join tblReview ON Product.GroupID = tblReview.GroupID WHERE (Product.CategoryID = @CategoryID) GROUP BY Product.ProductID, Product.Name, Product.GroupID, Product.GradeID I would like to return only the rows where Product.Name is unique. If I make a SELECT DISTINCT the ProductID is diffrent on every row so all the rows are unique. Thanks in andvance

    Read the article

  • SQL Query to find duplicates not returning any results

    - by TheDudeAbides
    I know there are duplicate account numbers in this table, but this query returns no results. SELECT [CARD NUMBER],[CUSTOMER NAME],[ACCT NBR 1],[ACCT NBR 2], COUNT([ACCT NBR 1]) AS NumOccurences FROM DebitCardData.dbo.['ATM Checking Accts - Active$'] GROUP BY [CARD NUMBER],[CUSTOMER NAME],[ACCT NBR 1],[ACCT NBR 2] HAVING (COUNT([ACCT NBR 1])1)

    Read the article

  • Specifying schema for temporary tables

    - by Tom Hunter
    I'm used to seeing temporary tables created with just the hash/number symbol, like this: CREATE TABLE #Test ( [Id] INT ) However, I've recently come across stored procedure code that specifies the schema name when creating temporary tables, for example: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[#Test] ( [Id] INT ) Is there any reason why you would want to do this? If you're only specifying the user's default schema, does it make any difference? Does this refer to the [dbo] schema in the local database or the tempdb database?

    Read the article

  • Getting Null value Of variable in sql server

    - by Neo
    Strange situation In a trigger i assign a column value to variable but gives exception while inserting into other table using that variable. e.g select @srNO=A.SrNo from A where id=123; insert into B (SRNO) values (@srNo) // here it gives null I run above select query in query pane it works fine but in trigger it gives me null any suggestions

    Read the article

  • Remove and Replace multiple chars ( spaces, hyphen, brackets, period) from string in sql

    - by Muhammad Kashif Nadeem
    +39 235 6595750 19874624611 +44 (0)181 446 5697 +431 6078115-2730 +1 617 358 5128 +48.40.23755432 +44 1691 872 410 07825 893217 0138 988 1649 (415) 706 2001 00 44 (0) 20 7660 4650 (765) 959-1504 07731 508 486 please reply by email dont have one +447769146971 Please see the above given phone numbers. I need to replace all spaces, hyphen, period, brackets and leading 0 etc from these numbers. I need this format +447469186974 If number has leading plus sign then don't replace it otherwise I have to concatenate + sign with it. E.G +39 235 6595750 in this number I just need to remove spaces. +44 (0)181 446 5697 in this i need to removes spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets i.e (0) 07825 893217 in this I need to replace leading 0 with + sign and remove spaces (415) 706 2001 in this replace '(' with + sign and remove ')' and spaces. 'please reply by email' This is the entry in phone number field and I just need to ignore this. +48.40.23755432 Remove period in phone number (765) 959-1504 Remove brackets and spaces and hyphen and add + sign in front of number. 7798724250 just need to add + sign in front of number 00 44 (0) 20 7660-4650 Need to remove leading 0 I.E '00' remove spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets and hyphen and add + sign in front of number Only leading '0' will be replaced not anyother occourence of '0' The desired result is +447769146971 Should I use nested REPLACE, CHARINDES, PATINDES for each char I want to replace? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • SQL Operators as text in where clause

    - by suggy1982
    I have the following table, which is used for storing bandings. The table is maintained via a web frontend. CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Banding]( [BandingID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [ValueLowerLimitOperator] [varchar](10) NULL, [ValueLowerLimit] [decimal](9, 2) NULL, [ValueUpperLimitOperator] [varchar](10) NULL, [ValueUpperLimit] [decimal](9, 2) NULL, [VolumeLowerLimitOperator] [varchar](10) NULL The operator fields store values such as < = <=. I want to get to a position where I can use the operators values stored in the table in a case statement in a where clause. Like this. SELECT * FROM table WHERE CASE ValueLowerLimitOperator WHEN '<' THEN VALUE < X WHEN '>' THEN VALUE > X END rather than having to write mutiple case or if statements for each permutation. Does anyone have any suggestions how I can decode the operators values stored in the table as part of my query and then use them in a case/where statement?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2005: When copy table structure to other database "CONSTRAINT" keywords lost

    - by StreamT
    Snippet of original table: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Batch]( [CustomerDepositMade] [money] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Batch_CustomerDepositMade] DEFAULT (0) Snippet of copied table: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Batch]( [CustomerDepositMade] [money] NOT NULL, Code for copy database: Server server = new Server(SourceSQLServer); Database database = server.Databases[SourceDatabase]; Transfer transfer = new Transfer(database); transfer.CopyAllObjects = true; transfer.CopySchema = true; transfer.CopyData = false; transfer.DropDestinationObjectsFirst = true; transfer.DestinationServer = DestinationSQLServer; transfer.CreateTargetDatabase = true; Database ddatabase = new Database(server, DestinationDatabase); ddatabase.Create(); transfer.DestinationDatabase = DestinationDatabase; transfer.Options.IncludeIfNotExists = true; transfer.TransferData();

    Read the article

  • Optimal way to convert to date

    - by IMHO
    I have legacy system where all date fields are maintained in YMD format. Example: 20101123 this is date: 11/23/2010 I'm looking for most optimal way to convert from number to date field. Here is what I came up with: declare @ymd int set @ymd = 20101122 select @ymd, convert(datetime, cast(@ymd as varchar(100)), 112) This is pretty good solution but I'm wandering if someone has better way doing it

    Read the article

  • What version of DataAnnotations is included with ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM

    - by Nick Thoresby
    I'm working on a project using Visual Studio 2008 and have moved from the the MVC 2 Preview to RTM version. We would like to use model validation such as: public class ViewModel { [Required(ErrorMessage="UserName is required.")] [StringLength(10, ErrorMessage="UserName cannot be greater than 10 chars.")] public string UserName { get; set; } } [HttpPost] public ActionResult Register(ViewModel model) { if (ModelState.IsValid){} // Always true } However the ModelState.IsValid always returns true. I have a suspicion that it might be something to do with the version of System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.dll that we are referencing, currently version 99.0.0.0, which seems rather odd. Does anyone know what version of this dll is included with the MVC 2 RTM for Visual Studio 2008?

    Read the article

  • Where to put conditionals in ANSI-syntax SQL queries

    - by RenderIn
    What's the difference between these two queries? I've been resistant to jumping on the ANSI-syntax bandwagon because I have not been able to unravel various syntactical ambiguities. Is 1) returning the product of the join and only then filtering out those joined records which have weight = 500? And is 2) filtering out those prior to the join? Is 2 bad syntax? Why might I use that? 1: SELECT SOMETHING FROM FOO INNER JOIN BAR ON FOO.NAME = BAR.NAME WHERE BAR.WEIGHT < 500 2: SELECT SOMETHING FROM FOO INNER JOIN BAR ON FOO.NAME = BAR.NAME AND BAR.WEIGHT < 500

    Read the article

  • Help with MySQL query

    - by Michael S.
    I have a table that contains the next columns: ip(varchar 255), index(bigint 20), time(timestamp) each time something is inserted there, the time column gets current timestamp. I want to run a query that returns all the rows that have been added in the last 24 hours. This is what I try to execute: SELECT ip, index FROM users WHERE ip = 'some ip' AND TIMESTAMPDIFF(HOURS,time,NOW()) < 24 And it doesn't work. Can someone help me out? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • How to index a table with a Type 2 slowly changing dimension for optimal performance

    - by The Lazy DBA
    Suppose you have a table with a Type 2 slowly-changing dimension. Let's express this table as follows, with the following columns: * [Key] * [Value1] * ... * [ValueN] * [StartDate] * [ExpiryDate] In this example, let's suppose that [StartDate] is effectively the date in which the values for a given [Key] become known to the system. So our primary key would be composed of both [StartDate] and [Key]. When a new set of values arrives for a given [Key], we assign [ExpiryDate] to some pre-defined high surrogate value such as '12/31/9999'. We then set the existing "most recent" records for that [Key] to have an [ExpiryDate] that is equal to the [StartDate] of the new value. A simple update based on a join. So if we always wanted to get the most recent records for a given [Key], we know we could create a clustered index that is: * [ExpiryDate] ASC * [Key] ASC Although the keyspace may be very wide (say, a million keys), we can minimize the number of pages between reads by initially ordering them by [ExpiryDate]. And since we know the most recent record for a given key will always have an [ExpiryDate] of '12/31/9999', we can use that to our advantage. However... what if we want to get a point-in-time snapshot of all [Key]s at a given time? Theoretically, the entirety of the keyspace isn't all being updated at the same time. Therefore for a given point-in-time, the window between [StartDate] and [ExpiryDate] is variable, so ordering by either [StartDate] or [ExpiryDate] would never yield a result in which all the records you're looking for are contiguous. Granted, you can immediately throw out all records in which the [StartDate] is greater than your defined point-in-time. In essence, in a typical RDBMS, what indexing strategy affords the best way to minimize the number of reads to retrieve the values for all keys for a given point-in-time? I realize I can at least maximize IO by partitioning the table by [Key], however this certainly isn't ideal. Alternatively, is there a different type of slowly-changing-dimension that solves this problem in a more performant manner?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307  | Next Page >