Search Results

Search found 37166 results on 1487 pages for 'google website optimizer'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 305/1487 | < Previous Page | 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312  | Next Page >

  • Does Wordpress have any SEO benifits on sites coded from scratch? [closed]

    - by Glycan
    Possible Duplicate: Do wordpress websites get indexed quicker by SE than a regular website? I have heard SEO experts suggest moving sites to Wordpress for SEO optimization. Googling offers some perspectives that confirm this (like this or somewhat more dubiously, this). Is this accurate? Some other places say that it doesn't matter, except that Wordpress configures all the meta correctly. In that case, what exactly must be configured?

    Read the article

  • SEO for duplicate sites with multiple domain extensions

    - by lock
    I am running business in different nations and I got domains for example www.mydomain.com www.mydomain.us www.mydomain.ca www.mydomain.uk www.mydomain.com.au So, if I run same website with same content (of course there will be little changes like address, etc.) as all these domains has same content will it be considered as spam or will the domains rank well as per the country? Also, is there solutions if Google considers this as spam.

    Read the article

  • Lancement proche d'une API Google+ pour les photos et vidéos annoncée par erreur, les pages s'ouvrent aux solutions tierces d'entreprise

    Lancement proche d'une API Google+ pour les photos et vidéos Annoncée prématurément par erreur, les pages s'ouvrent aux solutions d'entreprises tierces Mise à jour du 16 novembre 2011 par Idelways Avec la publication par erreur d'un billet de blog et son retrait rapide trahi par le cache de Google et les différents flux, l'entreprise a anticipé l'annonce d'une nouvelle API permettant d'accéder aux albums photo et vidéo postés sur le réseau social Google+. L'ingénieur Yongzhu Li a expliqué sur le blog officiel de la plateforme Google+ (exemple de code à l'appui) que la nouvelle API donnera accès aux contenus multimédias d...

    Read the article

  • How can I advetise efficiatly on my sites? [on hold]

    - by Smillification
    Are there any ad networks that give publishers/websites the ability to display adverts that are chosen by the publisher immediately on page load. Lets say the page loads, and a script inserts certain key words that the ad network uses to search their inventory of adverts and assigns the nearest one with matching tags to the publisher advert area? I know Google's adsense and many other similar services index/reads the pages content and then assign certain advert depending on the content with little or no control by the publisher... Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Chrome : Google se met au 64 bits sur Windows 7 et 8 et propose une version plus rapide, stable et sécurisée de son navigateur

    Chrome : Google se met au 64 bits sur Windows 7 et 8 et propose une version plus rapide, stable et sécurisée de son navigateur Google vient de publier les versions tests de Chrome destinées aux utilisateurs de Windows 7 et Windows 8 sur le canal réservé aux développeurs ainsi que via Google Chrome Canary afin de « donner une expérience plus rapide et plus sûre de la navigation ». Google a estimé que cette version offrent aux utilisateurs trois principaux avantages : la vitesse puisque le 64-bits...

    Read the article

  • Retrieving Chrome History and History Archives for Mac

    - by Justin
    I've read some articles here that suggest that we are able to retrieve Chrome's history as SQLite databases: Export history from chome browser How can I view "archived" Google Chrome history — i.e. history older than three months? I can't seem to find the folder where these are supposed to be located. In the first article, the provided path was ~/Library/Application\ Support/Google/Chrome/Default/History, but there is no such directory in my filesystem. I am using Chrome 26.0.1410.65 on Mac OS X Lion. And I am signed in with my Google account. Article http://unlockforus.blogspot.it/2008/09/how-opening-google-chrome-files-history.html provided in the last of the above is very useful, but it is only for Windows. Is there something similar to that but for Mac? Is there a way to find the folder where Chrome stores my history?

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

  • restrict access to IIS virtual directory from root website

    - by Senthil
    I have two domains (domain1.com and domain2.com). Both of them use the same Windows hosting server with IIS7. One of the domains is being called the "primary domain" by my hosting provider (GoDaddy) and it always points to the root folder that I was given. For the other domain, I have created a virtual directory in IIS and pointed it there. The folder structure is like this - root/ --Default.aspx --SomeFile.aspx --domain2folder/ ----Default.aspx ----Domain2SomeFile.aspx So, if I type domain1.com, I see the regulakr Default.aspx. But if I type domain2.com, I am shown the contents of domain2folder as if it were a separate web application - I think that is what IIS virtual directory is meant for. Well and good. But the problem is, when I type http://domain1.com/domain2folder, I see the domain2's website! But I don't want that to be shown when I use the path like that from domain1. Only if they use domain2.com, user should be able to see those contents. How can I do that? Hope I am making sense. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Working around Gmail mailing-list "feature."

    - by Paul J. Lucas
    I'm using Google Apps for my domain's e-mail via IMAP. Whenever I send mail to a mailing list, I don't receive a copy of my own mail back in my inbox. According to Google, this is a "feature." Is there a way to disable this "feature" so that all mail I send to mailing lists appears in my inbox just like all other e-mail? Perhaps something along the lines of this method for disabling Google's spam filter??

    Read the article

  • Set up internal domain to use external SMTP in Exchange 2007

    - by Geoffrey
    I'm moving to Google Apps and have setup dual-delivery. Everything is fine, but for mail sent internally (from [email protected] to [email protected]), Exchange is not using the send connectors I have pointing to Google's servers. I believe my question is similar to this question: How to force internal email through an smtp connector in exchange 2007 Again, if a user is connected to the Exchange server and tries to send to [email protected] it works just fine, but I cannot seem to force *@mydomain.com to route correctly. This should be a fairly simple, but according to this: google.com/support/forum/p/Google+Apps/thread?tid=30b6ad03baa57289&hl=en (can't post two links due to spam prevention) It does not seem possible. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How Could My Website Be Hacked

    - by Kiewic
    Hi! I wonder how this could happen. Someone delete my index.php files from all my domains and puts his own index.php files with the next message: Hacked by Z4i0n - Fatal Error - 2009 [Fatal Error Group Br] Site desfigurado por Z4i0n Somos: Elemento_pcx - s4r4d0 - Z4i0n - Belive Gr33tz: W4n73d - M4v3rick - Observing - MLK - l3nd4 - Soul_Fly 2009 My domain has many subdomains, but only the subdomains that can be accessed with an specific user were hacked, the rest weren't affected. I assumed that someone entered through SSH, because some of these subdomains are empty and Google doesn't know about them. But I checked the access log using the last command, but this didn't show any activity through SSH or FTP the day of the attack neither seven days before. Does anybody has an idea? I already changed my passwords. What do you recommend me to do? UPDATE My website is hosted at Dreamhost. I suppose they have the latest patches installed. But, while I was looking how they entered to my server, I found weird things. In one of my subdomains, there were many scripts for execute commands on the server, upload files, send mass emails and display compromising information. These files had been created since last December!! I have deleted those files and I'm looking for more malicious files. Maybe the security hold is an old and forgotten PHP application. This application has a file upload form protected by a password system based on sessions. One of the malicious scripts was in the uploads directory. This doesn't seem like an SQL Injection attack. Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • managing a high traffic media sharing website

    - by Jordan Westerman
    i'm in the process of developing a website that i predict will generate a lot of traffic. the site will be similar to many other sites offering free media streaming: mp3's. we are going to start with a pretty minimal amount of media to share, but the basic idea is that artists will set up a profile page with music they have made available for consumers to visit the page and listen to the music. we are starting with just a handful of artists, but i think that this project will generate more and more artist pages. eventually i'd like to set it up so consumers can create personalized playlists. how can i best prepare server space and bandwidth capabilities? i have a small team of web designers and programmers working on the site, as i am pretty illiterate when it comes to site management. as the ring leader of this organization, i am more or less looking for financial requirements and monthly burn rate estimates. i don't have a ton of capitol to start with, putting together a business plan, but i am seeking investments. i have a game plan to grow fast enough to be successful, and slow enough to manage the financial growth requirements. any questions i may have failed to ask myself? is it realistic to start this project on a shared server, and upgrade? any financial advice you think i can use? i really appreciate any advice given, as this is my first business venture. thank you all in advance. Jordan Westerman D.B.A. Badfish Productions, LLC

    Read the article

  • How to install a private user script in Chrome 21+?

    - by Mathias Bynens
    In Chrome 20 and older versions, you could simply open any .user.js file in Chrome and it would prompt you to install the user script. However, in Chrome 21 and up, it downloads the file instead, and displays a warning at the top saying “Extensions, apps, and user scripts can only be added from the Chrome Web Store”. The “Learn More” link points to http://support.google.com/chrome_webstore/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2664769, but that page doesn’t say anything about user scripts, only about extensions in .crx format, apps, and themes. This part sounded interesting: Enterprise Administrators: You can specify URLs that are allowed to install extensions, apps, and themes directly through the ExtensionInstallSources policy. So, I ran the following commands, then restarted Chrome and Chrome Canary: defaults write com.google.Chrome ExtensionInstallSources -array "https://gist.github.com/*" defaults write com.google.Chrome.canary ExtensionInstallSources -array "https://gist.github.com/*" Sadly, these settings only seem to affect extensions, apps, and themes (as it says in the text), not user scripts. (I’ve filed a bug asking to make this setting affect user scripts as well.) Any ideas on how to install a private user script (that I don’t want to add to the Chrome Web Store) in Chrome 21+? Update: The problem was that gist.github.com’s raw URLs redirect to a different domain. So, use these commands instead: # Allow installing user scripts via GitHub or Userscripts.org defaults write com.google.Chrome ExtensionInstallSources -array "https://*.github.com/*" "http://userscripts.org/*" defaults write com.google.Chrome.canary ExtensionInstallSources -array "https://*.github.com/*" "http://userscripts.org/*" This works!

    Read the article

  • Hiding a Website from Search Engine Bots and Viewers by Disabling Default VirtualHost

    - by Basel Shishani
    When staging a website on a remote VPS, we would like it to be accessible to team members only, and we would also like to keep the search engine bots off until the site is finalized. Access control by host whether in Iptables or Apache is not desirable, as accessing hosts can vary. After some reading in Apache config and other SF postings, I settled on the following design that relies on restricting access to only through specific domain names: Default virtual host would be disabled in Apache config as follows - relying on Apache behavior to use first virtual host for site default: <VirtualHost *:80> # Anything matching this should be silently ignored. </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName secretsiteone.com DocumentRoot /var/www/secretsiteone.com </VirtualHost> <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName secretsitetwo.com ... </VirtualHost> Then each team member can add the domain names in their local /etc/hosts: xx.xx.xx.xx secrethostone.com My question is: is the above technique good enough to achieve the above said goals esp restricting SE bots, or is it possible that bots would work around that. Note: I understand that mod_rewrite rules con be used to achieve a similar effect as discussed here: How to disable default VirtualHost in apache2?, so the same question would apply to that technique too. Also please note: the content is not highly secretive - the idea is not to devise something that is hack proof, so we are not concerned about traffic interception or the like. The idea is to keep competitors and casual surfers from viewing the content before it's released, and to prevent SE bots from indexing it.

    Read the article

  • Email notification and mail server

    - by Jerr Wu
    I am building a web application with email notification just like Facebook, which will host in http://www.linode.com/. When a user A comment to a post, the poster will get an email notification from '[email protected]' with the comment message written by user A. (Not spam) I really like Google Apps but they have sending limits 2000 sending per day, that is not suit for my case becuz I cannot have sending limits. There will be many email notifications. http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=166852 I also need company email accounts for team members use which I prefer Google Apps. My web application will host in linode, I am considering "Amazon Simple Notification Service" for the email notification. My questions are Any other recommend email service provider suits my case for me? Can I bind company email accounts(ex: [email protected]) with Google Apps and bind [email protected] with other email service provider?

    Read the article

  • How to run a website domain without redirecting if IP is already used for another website? [duplicate]

    - by SSpoke
    This question already has an answer here: Hosting multiple distinct folders for distinct domains 1 answer I bought a VPS Host that gave me only 1 IP Address which I used on my first domain name and it works without any problems. Now my second domain name I can't use the same ip address as it points to the first domain name. So I figured my only option was to use a GoDaddy hosted iframe redirection which redirects to a sub folder on my first domain which worked so far. Now I'm trying to load paypal from <?php headers() ?> and I get a permission error because of that iframe Refused to display 'https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?notify_url=&cmd=_cart&upload=1&business=removed&address_override=1' in a frame because it set 'X-Frame-Options' to 'SAMEORIGIN'. How do I avoid the Iframe solution for my second domain while not messing up my first domain? Somebody I forgot once told me it doesn't matter if you have 1 IP Address you could host multiple websites on it? how it that possible the DNS doesn't seem to work off ports afaik, yes I could host multiple websites on different folders but that's not what I call hosting a real website it has to be pointed by a domain name, so this iframe issue doesn't happen My server configuration is httpd (apache) that comes with CentOS 6 (Linux) operating system

    Read the article

  • Scanning website for vulnerablities

    - by Kristen
    I have found that the local school's website installed a Perl Calendar - this was years ago, it has not been used for ages, but Google has it indexed (which is how I found it) and it full of Viagra links and the like ... program was by Matt Kruse, here is details of the exploit: http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5IP040A1QI.html I've got the school to remove that, but I think they also have MySQL installed and I'm aware that out-of-the-box there have been some exploits of Admin Tools / Login in old versions. For all I know they also have PHPBB and the like installed ... The school is just using some cheap, shared hosting; the HTTP response header I get is: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) Chili!Soft-ASP/3.6.2 mod_ssl/2.8.14 OpenSSL/0.9.6b PHP/4.4.9 FrontPage/5.0.2.2510 I'm looking for some means of checking if they have other junk installed (quite possibly from way back, and now unused) that might put the site at risk. I'm more interested in something that can scan for things like the MySQL Admin exploit rather than open ports etc. My guess is that they have little control over the hosting space that they have - but I'm a Windows DEV, so this *nix stuff is all Greek to me. I found http://www.beyondsecurity.com/ which looks like it might do what I want (within their evaluation :) ) but I have a worry about how to find out if they are well known / honest - otherwise I will be tipping them a wink with a Domain Name that may be at risk! Many thanks.

    Read the article

  • Website cannot be accessed with google DNS because of unsigned DNS

    - by Sinan Samet
    I get this error: Inconsistent security for stakeholdergame.com - DS found at parent, but no DNSKEY found at child. On http://dnscheck.pingdom.com/?domain=stakeholdergame.com People can't access my site with google public DNS because of this. How do I solve this problem? dig @ns1.haveabyte.nl stakeholdergame.com DS shows me this ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> @ns1.haveabyte.nl stakeholdergame.com DS ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42223 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;stakeholdergame.com. IN DS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: stakeholdergame.com. 14400 IN SOA ns1.haveabyte.nl. hostmaster.stakeholdergame.com. 2014030300 14400 3600 1209600 86400 ;; Query time: 21 msec ;; SERVER: 79.170.93.174#53(79.170.93.174) ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 10 11:20:41 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 100

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

  • Working around Gmail mailing-list “feature.”

    - by Paul J. Lucas
    I'm using Google Apps for my domain's e-mail via IMAP. Whenever I send mail to a mailing list, I don't receive a copy of my own mail back in my inbox. According to Google, this is a "feature." Is there a way to disable this "feature" so that all mail I send to mailing lists appears in my inbox just like all other e-mail? Perhaps something along the lines of this method for disabling Google's spam filter??

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Reporting Services - website blank, builder works

    - by Keith
    We have a few reports in SQL Server Reporting Services. For some reason when we run the report from the website, it doesn't return any data. When I run the same report from the Report Builder, it returns data. I looked in the logs and the only errors I could find is: ReportingServicesService!library!8!6/15/2012-08:12:33:: i INFO: Current DB Version Unknown, Instance Version C.0.8.54. ReportingServicesService!library!8!6/15/2012-08:12:33:: e ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.InvalidReportServerDatabaseException: The version of the report server database is either in a format that is not valid, or it cannot be read. The found version is 'Unknown'. The expected version is 'C.0.8.54'. To continue, update the version of the report server database and verify access rights., ;Info: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.InvalidReportServerDatabaseException: The version of the report server database is either in a format that is not valid, or it cannot be read. The found version is 'Unknown'. The expected version is 'C.0.8.54'. To continue, update the version of the report server database and verify access rights. ReportingServicesService!library!8!6/15/2012-08:12:33:: e ERROR: Exception caught while starting service. Error: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.InvalidReportServerDatabaseException: The version of the report server database is either in a format that is not valid, or it cannot be read. The found version is 'Unknown'. The expected version is 'C.0.8.54'. To continue, update the version of the report server database and verify access rights. I'm not really sure why it would be a different version. It's all SQL Server 2008 R2 and I haven't made any changes to it since it's been running.

    Read the article

  • Does GoogleBot respect User-agent: *

    - by rkulla
    I blocked a page in robots.txt under User-agent: *, and tried to do a manual removal of that URL from Google's cache in the webmasters tools. Google said it wasn't being blocked in my robots.txt, so I then blocked it specifically under User-agent: GoogleBot and tried removing it again and this time it worked. Does that mean Google doesn't respect User-agent: * or what?

    Read the article

  • Copy a website and preserve the file & folder structure

    - by DrStalker
    I have an old web site running on an ancient version of Oracle Portal that we need to convert to a flat-html structure. Due to damage to the server we are not able to access the administrative interface, and even if we could there is no export functionality that can work with modern software versions. It would be enough to crawl the website and have all the pages & images saved to a folder, but the file structure needs to be preserved; that is, if a page is located at http://www.oldserver.com/foo/bar/baz/mypage.html then it needs to be saved to /foo/bar/baz/mypage.html so that the various Javascript bits will continue to function. None of the web crawlers I've found have been able to do this; they all want to rename the pages (page01.html, page02.html etc) and break the folder structure. Is there any crawler out there that will recreate the site structure as it appears to a user accessing the site? It doesn't need to redo any of teh content of the pages; once rehosted the pages will all have the same names they did originally so links will continue to work.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312  | Next Page >