Search Results

Search found 15661 results on 627 pages for 'protected mode'.

Page 321/627 | < Previous Page | 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328  | Next Page >

• I cannot run application on android, but emulator can.

  - by Daisy

  protected void showCurrentLocation(){ Location lc = locationManager.getLastKnownLocation(LocationManager.GPS_PROVIDER); if(lc != null){ String msg = String.format("Current Location \n Logitude: %1$s \n Latitude: %2$s",lc.getLongitude(),lc.getLatitude()); Toast.makeText(Test1.this,msg,3000).show(); } Toast.makeText(Test1.this,"location is null",3000).show(); } from code above, when I run on android phone. It can run but its only show location is null. I don't know why its can't get location from getLastKnownLocation() http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2010/09/android-location-based-services.html This is a source code which I got to tried. Please help me. Thanks ka :)) Ps. I already have I already have ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION,ACCESS_MOCK_LOCATION, and ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION

  Read the article

• Delegate won't update page

  - by mat690

  I am trying to change the active index of a multiview by using a delegate and it doesn't work as i expect. this is my code protected void ucWaitPage_FinishedWaiting(PerformAfterWaitDelegate performAfterWait) { performAfterWait.Invoke(); this.SetIndex(); } private void SetIndex() { this.mvwTest.ActiveViewIndex = 0; } The performAfterWait Delegate points to the SetIndex() method. When the performAfterWait delegate gets invoked SetIndex() gets called but when SetIndex() returns this.mvwTest.ActiveViewIndex reverts to being equal to 1. However when i call the SetIndex() method directly it sets this.mvwTest.ActiveViewIndex = 0 and the change persists when the method returns.

  Read the article

• Why do I get CA1811 when I call a private method from a public method in C++/CLI?

  - by brickner

  I've recently upgraded my project from Visual Studio 2008 to Visual Studio 2010. By enabling Code Analysis and building on Release, I'm getting warning CA1811: Avoid uncalled private code. I've managed to reduce the code to this: .h file: public ref class Foo { public: virtual System::String^ ToString() override; private: static System::String^ Bar(); }; .cpp file: String^ Foo::ToString() { return Bar(); } String^ Foo::Bar() { return "abc"; } The warning I get: CA1811 : Microsoft.Performance : 'Foo::Bar(void)' appears to have no upstream public or protected callers. It doesn't matter if Bar() is static or not. I've tried to reproduce it in C# but I can't. I can only reproduce it in C++/CLI. Why do I get this warning? Is this a Visual Studio 2010 bug?

  Read the article

• Why is EventListenerList traversed backwards in fireFooXXX()?

  - by Joonas Pulakka

  I don't understand the rationale of this code, taken from javax.swing.event.EventListenerList docs: protected void fireFooXXX() { // Guaranteed to return a non-null array Object[] listeners = listenerList.getListenerList(); // Process the listeners last to first, notifying // those that are interested in this event for (int i = listeners.length-2; i>=0; i-=2) { if (listeners[i]==FooListener.class) { // Lazily create the event: if (fooEvent == null) fooEvent = new FooEvent(this); ((FooListener)listeners[i+1]).fooXXX(fooEvent); } } } Why is the list traversed backwards? Why is only every second listener called? The event firing is implemented exactly this way in javax.swing.tree.DefaultTreeModel among others, so it's obviously me who's just not getting something.

  Read the article

• Using Interfaces in an action signature of ASP.NET MVC controller

  - by Dmitry Borovsky

  Hello, I want to use interface in Action signature. So I've tried make own ModelBinder by deriving DefaultModelBinder: public class InterfaceBinder<T> : DefaultModelBinder where T: new() { protected override object CreateModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext, Type modelType) { return base.CreateModel(controllerContext, bindingContext, typeof(T)); } } public interface IFoo { string Data { get; set; } } public class Foo: IFoo /*other interfaces*/ { /* a lot of other methods and properties*/ public Bar Data{get;set;} string IFoo.Data { get{return Data.ToString()}; set{Data = new Bar(value)}; } } public class MegaController: Controller { public ActionResult Process([ModelBinder(typeof(InterfaceBinder<Foo>))]IFoo foo){/*bla-bla-bla*/} } But it doesn't work. Does anybody have idea how release this behaviour? And yes, I know that I can make my own implementation of IModelBinder, but I'm looking for easier way.

  Read the article

• Find directory on different server C#

  - by rainhider

  I have a website on Server A and it needs to find a directory on Server B. On my aspx page, I have: <mb:FileSystemDataSource ID="fileSystemDataSource" runat="server" RootPath="\\servername\Folder\Subfolder" FoldersOnly="true" /> mb is assembly name alias. On my aspx.cs page, I have: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { DataTable gridviewSource = DisplayFilesInGridView(); DataRow gridviewRow; //sets the server path so it does not default to current server string ServerPath = System.IO.Path.Combine( "//", this.fileSystemDataSource.RootPath); //Get All Folders Or Directories and add in table DirectoryInfo directory = new DirectoryInfo(Server.MapPath(ServerPath)); DirectoryInfo[] subDirectories = directory.GetDirectories(); } Well, it throws an error on the Server.MapPath because it cannot find the server. I am connected to the network. I looked at IIS, and I am pretty sure that is not the problem. If so, I would really need specifics. Any help would be appreciated.

  Read the article

• Access Rules created by WSAT are not enforced

  - by rsteckly

  Hi, I'm trying to implement roles in my site. There are several projects in the solution, one of which is a web application. In that web application, I'm trying to use WSAT to create three roles. There are many folders for the application. I've used WSAT to define role based access rules for each folder. However, when I debug and navigate to those pages, they do not redirect to a login and show me the protected page. There are web.config files in each folder. Why would the system not enforce these rules? My web.config file has: I've tested the connections in WSAT and they work. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• How can I ensure that a Java object (containing cryptographic material) is zeroized?

  - by Jeremy Powell

  My concern is that cryptographic keys and secrets that are managed by the garbage collector may be copied and moved around in memory without zeroization. As a possible solution, is it enough to: public class Key { private char[] key; // ... protected void finalize() throws Throwable { try { for(int k = 0; k < key.length; k++) { key[k] = '\0'; } } catch (Exception e) { //... } finally { super.finalize(); } } // ... }

  Read the article

• Exception of Binding form data to object

  - by Captain Kidd

  I'm practising Spring MVC.But fail to populate command object in Controller when I use spring standard tag. For example: "form:input path="password"" But I perfectly do this with HTML standard tag. Like: "input type="text" name="password"" I wonder the way how to use Spring tag binding data. In addition, I think configuration and coding is right in my sample. protected ModelAndView onSubmit(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, Object command, BindException errors) throws Exception { UserFormBean b = (UserFormBean)command; System.out.println("s"); return super.onSubmit(request, response, command, errors); } <form:form commandName="command" action="/SpringFrame/register.html"> <form:input path="password"/> <!-- <input type="text" name="password"/> --> <input type="submit"/> </form:form>

  Read the article

• User not being saved, SharedPreferences

  - by Lars

  Hi i have a inlogscreen (inlogdialog.xml), which includes 2 EditText (username, passwd) and i have a CheckBox (saveuser) with which the user can decide weather to save the username or not. On the mainform (main.xml) i have a listner for these 3 values: private class OnReadyListener implements MyCustomForm.ReadyListener { public void ready(String user, String pass, boolean save) { username = user; password = pass; } } Now i first want to save the username through SharedPreferences but it doesn`t get saved, can someone help me please? If i check with system.out.println, the username is present in String username. SharedPreferenes code in main.xml: public static final String USERNM = ""; private SharedPreferences mPrefs; ....... @Override protected void onPause() { Editor e = mPrefs.edit(); e.putString(USERNM, username); <---- e.commit(); Toast.makeText(this, "Items saved.", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); super.onPause(); }

  Read the article

• GWT: Select a TreeItem with right click

  - by Ivan

  I'm capturing a right click event to show a context menu. What I haven't been able to figure out, is how to make the right click actually select the TreeItem, prior to showing of context menu. All help is appreciated. private Tree tree = new Tree() { @Override public void onBrowserEvent(Event event) { if (event.getTypeInt() == Event.ONCONTEXTMENU) { DOM.eventPreventDefault(event); showContextMenu(event); } super.onBrowserEvent(event); } @Override protected void setElement(Element elem) { super.setElement(elem); sinkEvents(Event.ONCONTEXTMENU); } };

  Read the article

• How to update a control outside of an updatepanel?

  - by Matin Habibi

  Dear all, I am going to show some text in a TextBox, which is located outside of an updatepanel, after checking a CheckBox but I cannot make it work. please help me out ? Here is my code: <asp:UpdatePanel runat="server" ID="uplMaster"> <ContentTemplate> <asp:CheckBox ID="cbShowText" runat="server" Text="Show Some Text" AutoPostBack="true" OnCheckedChanged="cbShowText_CheckedChanged" /> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> <asp:TextBox ID="txtBox" Text="Empty" runat="server" /> Code Behind: protected void cbShowText_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { txtBox.Text = "Some Text"; } Thanks in advance :D P.S. As you might have guessed, I have resembled my problem and that is why I don't want to put the TextBox in the UpdatePanel

  Read the article

• Adding search for a private website

  - by Vitor Py

  I have a login-protected website. It's an internal application and it's not avaiable to the general public hence it's not indexed by any search engine. My application is developed on the Google App Engine. I would like to add a search engine but obviously without the need to public index it. There's any solution avaiable from Google/Bing/Others for a situation like this? Have you done this before? What solution did you chose and what are yours results?

  Read the article

• VB.net: Custom ' TODO: List on an Interface

  - by Shiftbit

  How do I add my own todo and comments list to appear on Interfaces? I want it to pop up like IDisposable does: Public Class Foo : Implements IDisposable Private disposedValue As Boolean = False ' To detect redundant calls ' IDisposable Protected Overridable Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean) If Not Me.disposedValue Then If disposing Then ' TODO: free other state (managed objects). End If ' TODO: free your own state (unmanaged objects). ' TODO: set large fields to null. End If Me.disposedValue = True End Sub #Region " IDisposable Support " ' This code added by Visual Basic to correctly implement the disposable pattern. Public Sub Dispose() Implements IDisposable.Dispose ' Do not change this code. Put cleanup code in Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean) above. Dispose(True) GC.SuppressFinalize(Me) End Sub #End Region End Class Whenever I enter my own comments and todo list they are never autogenerated like IDisposable Interface does. I would like my own Interfaces to preserve the comments so that I can share my Interfaces with in source documentation.

  Read the article

• Should my internal API classes be all in one package?

  - by Chris

  I'm hard at work packaging up an API for public consumption. As such I'm trying to limit the methods that are exposed to only those that I wish to be public and supportable. Underneath this of course there are a multitude of limited access methods. The trouble is that I have a lot of internal code that needs to access these restricted methods without making those methods public. This creates two issues: I can't create interfaces to communicate between classes as this would make these my internal methods public. I can't access protected or default methods unless I put the majority of my internal classes in the same package. So, I have around 70 or 80 internal classes in cleanly segregated packages BUT with overly permissive access modifiers. Would you say that a single package is the lesser of two evils or is there a better way to be able to mask my internal methods whilst keeping more granular packages? I'd be interested to find out the best practice here. I'm already aware of This

  Read the article

• Better explanation of $this-> in this example please

  - by Doug

  Referring to this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2035449/why-is-oop-hard-for-me class Form { protected $inputs = array(); public function makeInput($type, $name) { echo '<input type="'.$type.'" name="'.$name.'">'; } public function addInput($type, $name) { $this->inputs[] = array("type" => $type, "name" => $name); } public function run() { foreach($this->inputs as $array) { $this->makeInput($array['type'], $array['name']; } } } $form = new form(); $this->addInput("text", "username"); $this->addInput("text", "password");** Can I get a better explanation of what the $this->input[] is doing in this part: public function addInput($type, $name) { $this->inputs[] = array("type" => $type, "name" => $name); }

  Read the article

• How can I modify input before model binding in asp.net mvc?

  - by David G

  How can I intercept submitted form input and modify it before it is bound to my model? For example, if I wanted to trim the whitespace from all text. I have tried creating a custom model binder like so: public class CustomBinder : DefaultModelBinder { protected override void SetProperty(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext, PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor, object value) { string newValue = ((string)value).Trim(); //example code to create new value but could be anything base.SetProperty(controllerContext, bindingContext, propertyDescriptor, newValue); } } but this doesn't seem to be invoked. Is there a better place to modify the input value? Note: I need to modify the value before it is bound and validated.

  Read the article

• print integer and array from file android

  - by vik

  i want to open a file and then calculate the integer and array value from file and print on the screen. i tried this but not working @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); TextView av = new TextView(this); setContentView(av); try { String i = "abc.xyz"; InputStream in = assets.open(i); try { DataInputStream din = new DataInputStream(in); int value = din.readInt(); // print value on screen int[] arry = new int[1]; // print arry on screen how to do it int arry[1] = din.readInt(); } } finally { in.close(); } } catch (IOException e) { throw new PuzzleIOException(e); } av.setText(size); }

  Read the article

• A pragmatic view on private vs public

  - by Denis Gorbachev

  Hello everybody! I've always wondered on the topic of public, protected and private properties. My memory can easily recall times when I had to hack somebody's code, and having the hacked-upon class variables declared as private was always upsetting. Also, there were (more) times I've written a class myself, and had never recognized any potential gain of privatizing the property. I should note here that using public vars is not in my habit: I adhere to the principles of OOP by utilizing getters and setters. So, what's the whole point in these restrictions?

  Read the article

• setting actionscript 3 superclass variables

  - by jedierikb

  In AS3, if I have a class such: public class dude { //default value for a dude protected var _strength:Number = 1; public function dude( ):void { super( ); //todo... calculate abilities of a dude based on his strength. } } and a subclass public class superDude extends dude { public function superDude( ):void { _strength = 100; super( ); trace( "strength of superDude: " + _strength ); } } This will trace strength of superDude is 1. I expected the variable I set in the subclass (prior to calling the superclass constructor) to remain. Is there a way to assign class variables in subclass constructors which are not over-written by the superclass construtor? Or should I pass them up as constructor variables?

  Read the article

• drop down list had zero value

  - by KareemSaad

  I had ddl which in selected changed it execute some code but when i tried to do that it wasn't worked well WHEN i checked the reason i found that ddl in selected value =0 also i made all well and this is my code protected void DDlProductFamily_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (DDlProductFamily.DataValueField.Contains("ProductCategory_Id")) using (SqlConnection Con = Connection.GetConnection()) { SqlCommand Com = new SqlCommand("GetListViewByProductCategory", Con); Com.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; Com.Parameters.Add(Parameter.NewInt("@ProductCategory_Id", DDlProductFamily.SelectedValue.ToString())); SqlDataAdapter DA = new SqlDataAdapter(Com); DA.Fill(dt); DataList1.DataSource = dt; DataList1.DataBind(); } }

  Read the article

• How do I protect Dynamic data pages using ASP.NET Authentication?

  - by ProfK

  I have a site where most of my pages are arranged in business area folders, e.g. Activations, Outdoors, Branding. Each folder has a small web.config that protects the contents against access by people without a role for that business area. However, basic admin for most business areas is done via Dynamic Data pages. These are only basically protected by not appearing in the menu unless the user has the correct role, but they are still accessible directly via URL, because of the {table}/{Action} routing used by Dynamic Data. What can I do to protect these pages against direct access?

  Read the article

• JAXB Customizations and List<Object>

  - by DaUltimateTrooper

  Hi everybody. I used JAXB to create some classes from an XSD. The result was not quite what I expected and most probably it can be customized. It created a generic list instead of 3 different lists. Can this be corrected somehow? @XmlElements({ @XmlElement(name = "M1", type = M1_Type.class), @XmlElement(name = "M2", type = M2_Type.class), @XmlElement(name = "M3", type = M3_Type.class) }) protected List<Object> m1Orm2OrM3; Is there a customization to fix this?

  Read the article

• getItemIdAtPosition() problem in Android?

  - by Praveen Chandrasekaran

  I am using the getItemIdAtPosition() to get the Basecoulmns id of the record in Sqlite Database. the code is below: protected void onListItemClick(ListView l, View v, int position, long id) { Cursor cursor = managedQuery(Constants.CONTENT_URI, PROJECTION, BaseColumns._ID + "=" + l.getItemIdAtPosition(position), null, null); } But its does not retrieves the id correctly. Is this method depends some thing at the time of setting adapter or creation of DB? I have no idea. why it shows the position of the listview. Any Idea?

  Read the article

• Zend Framework Custom Validation Class Error Message

  - by remlabm

  The validation fails as it should but does not return the error message. $form->addElement('text', 'phone_number', array( 'required' => true, 'validators' => array( array('NotEmpty', true, array('messages' => 'Enter a valid Phone Number')), array('regex', false, array('pattern' => '/\([0-9]{3}\)\s[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{4}/', 'messages' => 'Enter a valid Phone Number' )), 'CheckPhoneNumber'), ), )); Custom Class: class Custom_Validators_CheckPhoneNumber extends Zend_Validate_Abstract{ const IN_USE = 'inUse'; protected $_messageTemplates = array( self::IN_USE => "'%value%' is currently in use" ); public function isValid($value) { $this->_setValue($value); $user_check = Users::getActive(preg_replace("/[^0-9]/", "", $value)); if($user_check->id){ $this->_error(self::IN_USE); return false; } return true; } } Just fails does not give the "IN_USE" error.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328  | Next Page >