Search Results

Search found 31367 results on 1255 pages for 'table valued parameters'.

Page 329/1255 | < Previous Page | 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336  | Next Page >

• How to manage Constants in Application

  - by changed

  what is the best way to use Application Constants ? What i usually do is create a separate table in database of constants and reference them as foreign key in other table. In Java i use enum. But how to keep a single place of authority for constants in application and what are the different ways i can do that(like table or enum).

  Read the article

• How to dismiss the tableview while playing the video in iphone?

  - by Warrior

  I am new to iphone development.I created a application which parse a url and display the content in a table view. On clicking a row ,corresponding video is played. On clicking the "done"button on the player it come back to the table view.I want to dismiss the tableview before playing the video, just like you tube application and on clicking "done" button the table should appear as present modal view. How can i achieve that? Please help me out.Thanks.

  Read the article

• NULL ForeignKeyTo property in Subsonic 3/ASP.NET MVC?

  - by chad

  Issue: the primary key of the base table is named differently than the the key in the fk table. Subsonic 3 does not know how to handle that, which is fine, its beta. So I was going to change the Html.ControlFor logic to just grab the table and use the pkname from that: var fk = db.FindTable(col.ForeignKeyTo.FriendlyName); However the .ForeignKeyTo is null. Where in the templates does that ITable get populated?

  Read the article

• Fastest way to convert a list of doubles to a unique list of integers?

  - by javanix

  I am dealing with a MySQL table here that is keyed in a somewhat unfortunate way. Instead of using an auto increment table as a key, it uses a column of decimals to preserve order (presumably so its not too difficult to insert new rows while preserving a primary key and order). Before I go through and redo this table to something more sane, I need to figure out how to rekey it without breaking everything. What I would like to do is something that takes a list of doubles (the current keys) and outputs a list of integers (which can be cast down to doubles for rekeying). For example, input {1.00, 2.00, 2.50, 2.60, 3.00} would give output {1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Since this is a database, I also need to be able to update the rows nicely: UPDATE table SET `key`='3.00' WHERE `key`='2.50'; Can anyone think of a speedy algorithm to do this? My current thought is to read all of the doubles into a vector, take the size of the vector, and output a new vector with values from 1 => doubleVector.size. This seems pretty slow, since you wouldn't want to read every value into the vector if, for instance, only the last n/100 elements needed to be modified. I think there is probably something I can do in place, since only values after the first non-integer double need to be modified, but I can't for the life of me figure anything out that would let me update in place as well. For instance, setting 2.60 to 3.00 the first time you see 2.50 in the original key list would result in an error, since the key value 3.00 is already used for the table.

  Read the article

• Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException' in iPhnoe

  - by mayur birari

  i have view controller including image ,table and tab ,i want to fill the table thats why i written separate class for table as uitableviewcontroller and give mapping to that class in IB, but i have following exception Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '* -[AssetTableView superview]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x39322b0' please give me answer ,i am waiting, thANKS IN ADVANCE

  Read the article

• Dynamic paging using divs and Javascript

  - by jethomas

  I have a recordset loop that creates a table, and every 9 items it wraps a div around them so basically looks like: <div> <table>rs1, rs2 ----> rs9</table> </div> <div> <table>rs10, rs11 ----> rs18</table> </div> etc... Now, I want it so at first only the first div is showing and the others are hidden, but I have ASP loop that generates clickable links for the various divs (pages) and clicking on any given link will show that div and hide all the others. Here is the asp code I have so far: Dim i If totalPages > 1 Then Response.Write("<div id='navigation'>") For i=1 to totalPages Response.Write ("<a href='' onlick=''>"& i &"</a> | ") Next Response.Write("</div>") End If Now I just need to figure out the javascript...

  Read the article

• jQuery custom validation for a selected radio selection

  - by Kaushik Gopal

  Hey peeps, This is my requirement: I have a bunch of radio box selections (types of workflows). If one of the radios are selected(i.e one particular type of workflow selected), I want to run a custom validation on that. This is what i tried, but it's not behaving well. Any help? jQuery part: $(document).ready(function() { // this part is to expand the child radio selection if particular parent workflow selected $("#concernedDirectorChoice").hide(); $("input[name^=workflowChoice]").change( function (){ if($(this).attr("class")=='chooseDir'){ $("#concernedDirectorChoice").show(); }else{ $("#concernedDirectorChoice").hide(); } }); // FORM VALIDATION $.validator.addMethod("dirRequired", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || ($("input[name^=rdDir:checked]").length); }, "That particular workflow requires a Director to be chosen. Please select Director"); $("#contExpInitiateForm").validate({ debug:true ,rules:{ RenewalNo: {required: true, number: true}, chooseDir: {dirRequired: true}, workflowChoice: {required: true} } ,errorPlacement: function(error, element) { $('.errorMessageBox').text(error.html()); } }); }); HTML form part: <!-- Pick type of workflow --> <table class="hr-table" > <tr> <td class="hr-table-label " colspan=2 >Pick Workflow Type</td> </tr> <tr> <td> <input type="radio" name="workflowChoice" value="1"> </input> </td> <td> Workflow 1 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <input type="radio" name="workflowChoice" value="2" class="chooseDir"> </input> </td> <td> Workflow 2 (Dir selection required) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <input type="radio" name="workflowChoice" value="3"> </input> </td> <td> Workflow 3 </td> </tr> </table> <!-- Pick Director for Workflow type 2 --> <table id="concernedDirectorChoice" name="concernedDirectorChoice" > <tr><td class="hr-table-label" colspan=2 > Choose Concerned Director</td></tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio" value='Dir1' name="rdDir" /></td> <td>Director 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio" value='Dir2' name="rdDir" /></td> <td>Director 2</td> </tr> <tr> <td><input type="radio" value='Dir3' name="rdDir" /></td> <td>Director 3</td> </tr> </table>

  Read the article

• Transaction on Entity FrameWork Refactoring and best performance how can i?

  - by programmerist

  i try to use transaction in Entity FrameWork. i have 3 tables Personel, Prim, Finans. in Prim table you look SatisTutari (int) if i add data in SatisTutari.Text instead of int value adding float value. Trannsaction must be run! Everything is ok but how can i refactoring or give best performance or best writing Transaction coding! i have 3 table so i have 3 entities: CREATE TABLE Personel (PersonelID integer PRIMARY KEY identity not null, Ad varchar(30), Soyad varchar(30), Meslek varchar(100), DogumTarihi datetime, DogumYeri nvarchar(100), PirimToplami float); Go create TABLE Prim (PrimID integer PRIMARY KEY identity not null, PersonelID integer Foreign KEY references Personel(PersonelID), SatisTutari int, Prim float, SatisTarihi Datetime); Go CREATE TABLE Finans (ID integer PRIMARY KEY identity not null, Tutar float); Personel, Prim,Finans my tables. if you look Prim table you can see Prim value float value if i write a textbox not float value my transaction must run. protected void btnSave_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { using (TestEntities testCtx = new TestEntities()) { using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()) { Personel personel = new Personel(); Prim prim = new Prim(); Finans finans = new Finans(); //-----------------------------------------------------------------------Step 1 personel.Ad = txtName.Text; personel.Soyad = txtSurName.Text; personel.Meslek = txtMeslek.Text; personel.DogumTarihi = DateTime.Parse(txtSatisTarihi.Text); personel.DogumYeri = txtDogumYeri.Text; personel.PirimToplami = float.Parse(txtPrimToplami.Text); testCtx.AddToPersonel(personel); testCtx.SaveChanges(); //----------------------------------------------------------------------- step 2 prim.PersonelID = personel.PersonelID; prim.SatisTutari = int.Parse(txtSatisTutari.Text); prim.SatisTarihi = DateTime.Parse(txtSatisTarihi.Text); prim.Prim1 = double.Parse(txtPrim.Text); finans.Tutar = prim.SatisTutari * prim.Prim1; testCtx.AddToPrim(prim); testCtx.SaveChanges(); //----------------------------------------------------------------------- step 3 lblTutar.Text = finans.Tutar.Value.ToString(); testCtx.AddToFinans(finans); testCtx.SaveChanges(); scope.Complete(); } } How can i rearrange codes. i need best practice refactoring and best solution for reading easly and performance!!!

  Read the article

• Replication - syncronizing most of the data some of the time

  - by uncle brad

  I have some data that isn't properly "partitioned" (for lack of a better word). All inserts, processing and reporting happen on the same table. The bulk of the processing happens not long after the insert and not long after that it becomes immutable (we're talking days). I could do all inserts and processing on a new table that I replicate to the old table. When I detect that the data has become immutable I would delete the data from the new table, but I would edit the delete replication stored procedure so that the delete did not replicate. How bad an idea is this? It seems attractive at the moment (I haven't slept on it yet) because it might mitigate a performance problem with only very small changes to the application. It also seems like it might be a good way to shoot myself in the foot.

  Read the article

• Foreign key not working in MySQL: Why can I INSERT a value that's not in the foreign column?

  - by stalepretzel

  I've created a table in MySQL: CREATE TABLE actions ( A_id int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, type ENUM('rate','report','submit','edit','delete') NOT NULL, Q_id int NOT NULL, U_id int NOT NULL, date DATE NOT NULL, time TIME NOT NULL, rate tinyint(1), PRIMARY KEY (A_id), CONSTRAINT fk_Question FOREIGN KEY (Q_id) REFERENCES questions(P_id), CONSTRAINT fk_User FOREIGN KEY (U_id) REFERENCES users(P_id)); This created the table I wanted just fine (although a "DESCRIBE actions;" command showed me that the foreign keys were keys of type MUL, and I'm not sure what this means). However, when I try to enter a Q_id or a U_id that does not exist in the questions or users tables, MySQL still allows these values. What did I do wrong? How can I prevent a table with a foreign key from accepting invalid data? If I add TYPE=InnoDB to the end, I get an error: ERROR 1005 (HY000): Can't create table './quotes/actions.frm' (errno: 150) Why might that happen? I'm told that it's important to enforce data integrity with functional foreign keys, but also that InnoDB should not be used with MySQL. What do you recommend?

  Read the article

• Reset AutoNumber(Identity Field) in DataBase

  - by hosseinsinohe

  Hi All I Use a Sql Server Compact DataBase File For Store the Data in My Windows Application Software.In this DataBase I have A Table With Identity Field.When I Insert A Record To the Table, identity Code increment Automatically.But When I Delete All Records From Table,And Insert Records Again,Identity Field don't Start From 1. I Want Reset this Value to 1. Please Help Me

  Read the article

• MySQL - query to return CSV in a field?

  - by StackOverflowNewbie

  Assume I have the following tables: TABLE: foo - foo_id (PK) TABLE: tag - tag_id (PK) - name TABLE: foo_tag - foo_tag_id (PK) - foo_id (FK) - tag_id (FK) How do I query this so that I get a result like this: ========================== | foo_id | tags | ========================== | 1 | foo, bar | | 2 | foo | | 3 | bar | -------------------------- Basically, I need all of foo's tags in one column, comma separated. Possible in MySQL?

  Read the article

• How to select only the first rows for each unique value of a column

  - by nuit9

  Let's say I have a table of customer addresses: CName | AddressLine ------------------------------- John Smith | 123 Nowheresville Jane Doe | 456 Evergreen Terrace John Smith | 999 Somewhereelse Joe Bloggs | 1 Second Ave In the table, one customer like John Smith can have multiple addresses. I need the select query for this table to return only first row found where there are duplicates in 'CName'. For this table it should return all rows except the 3rd (or 1st - any of those two addresses are okay but only one can be returned). Is there a keyword I can add to the SELECT query to filter based on whether the server has already seen the column value before?

  Read the article

• EF4 Import/Lookup thousands of records - my performance stinks!

  - by Dennis Ward

  I'm trying to setup something for a movie store website (using ASP.NET, EF4, SQL Server 2008), and in my scenario, I want to allow a "Member" store to import their catalog of movies stored in a text file containing ActorName, MovieTitle, and CatalogNumber as follows: Actor, Movie, CatalogNumber John Wayne, True Grit, 4577-12 (repeated for each record) This data will be used to lookup an actor and movie, and create a "MemberMovie" record, and my import speed is terrible if I import more than 100 or so records using these tables: Actor Table: Fields = {ID, Name, etc.} Movie Table: Fields = {ID, Title, ActorID, etc.} MemberMovie Table: Fields = {ID, CatalogNumber, MovieID, etc.} My methodology to import data into the MemberMovie table from a text file is as follows (after the file has been uploaded successfully): Create a context. For each line in the file, lookup the artist in the Actor table. For each Movie in the Artist table, lookup the matching title. If a matching Movie is found, add a new MemberMovie record to the context and call ctx.SaveChanges(). The performance of my implementation is terrible. My expectation is that this can be done with thousands of records in a few seconds (after the file has been uploaded), and I've got something that times out the browser. My question is this: What is the best approach for performing bulk lookups/inserts like this? Should I call SaveChanges only once rather than for each newly created MemberMovie? Would it be better to implement this using something like a stored procedure? A snippet of my loop is roughly this (edited for brevity): while ((fline = file.ReadLine()) != null) { string [] token = fline.Split(separator); string Actor = token[0]; string Movie = token[1]; string CatNumber = token[2]; Actor found_actor = ctx.Actors.Where(a => a.Name.Equals(actor)).FirstOrDefault(); if (found_actor == null) continue; Movie found_movie = found_actor.Movies.Where( s => s.Title.Equals(title, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)).FirstOrDefault(); if (found_movie == null) continue; ctx.MemberMovies.AddObject(new MemberMovie() { MemberProfileID = profile_id, CatalogNumber = CatNumber, Movie = found_movie }); try { ctx.SaveChanges(); } catch { } } Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Dennis

  Read the article

• Every 3rd Insert Is Slow On Ms Sql 2008

  - by Chris

  I have a function that writes 3 lines into a empty table like so: INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (1, 8, 1) INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (2, 8, 4) INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (3, 8, 3) For some reason only the third query takes a long time to execute - and with each insert it grows longer. Profiler Image I have tried disabling all constraints on the table - same result. I just can't figure out why the first two would run so fast - and the last one would take so long. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Here is the statistics for a query ran MSSMS: Query: ALTER TABLE [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ALL INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (1, 9, 1) INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (2, 9, 4) INSERT [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] ([GroupID], [ForumID], [AccessMaskID]) VALUES (3, 9, 3) ALTER TABLE [dbo].[yaf_ForumAccess] CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL Stats: Stats

  Read the article

• Storing multiple checkbox values in database

  - by Madjokr

  Hi, I want to store multiple column values in table.Lets take a example .. What are your favourite colors? the choices can be red,blue,green, orange. So lets assume, the user selects atleast 2 values. Is there any way to store the multiple values in table. I have implemented by concatinating choices of users in a column in the table. I later found that it is a bad practise. Currently i can think of using Bitwise operator and habtm. What are the different ways for storing multiple choices values in table? If I am implementing in rails, What is the best way to implement this with OOP concepts? Is there any builtin options in rails?

  Read the article

• How to get Nokogiri to ignore HTML elements that doesn't exist

  - by user296507

  any idea how i can get the code below to produce this output? 1 - 2 - B i'm getting this error "undefined method `text' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)", because i think table 1 does not have the element 'td class=r2' in it. require 'rubygems' require 'nokogiri' require 'open-uri' doc = Nokogiri::HTML.parse(<<-eohtml) <table class="t1"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="r1">1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table class="t2"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="r1">2</td> <td class="r2">B</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> eohtml doc.css('tbody > tr').each do |n| r1 = n.at_css(".r1").text r2 = n.at_css(".r2").text puts "#{r1} - #{r2}" end

  Read the article

• I have Following code but rest of it how?

  - by Hakan

  I have following code which is putting value of text box to table but i can't manage how to delete record. Can someone help me about it? Dim meter As DataTable = Me.DataSet1.Tables.Item("tblmeter") Dim row As DataRow = meter.NewRow() row.Item("No") = Me.txtno.Text row.Item("Turnover") = Me.txtturnover.Text row.Item("Total Win") = Me.txttotalwin.Text row.Item("Games Played") = Me.txtgamesplayed.Text row.Item("Credit In") = Me.txtcreditin.Text row.Item("Bill In") = Me.txtbillin.Text row.Item("Hand Pay") = Me.txthandpay.Text row.Item("Date") = DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString meter.Rows.Add(row) Me.TblMeterTableAdapter.Update(Me.DataSet1.tblMeter) meter.AcceptChanges() Dim table As DataTable = Me.DataSet1.Tables.Item("tblmeter") Dim defaultView As DataView = table.DefaultView Dim cell As New DataGridCell((defaultView.Table.Rows.Count - 1), 1) Me.DataGrid1.CurrentCell = cell txtno.Text = "" txtturnover.Text = "" txttotalwin.Text = "" txtgamesplayed.Text = "" txtcreditin.Text = "" txtbillin.Text = "" txthandpay.Text = "" txtno.Focus() I am using following code but it's not update records. Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Dim current As DataRowView = DirectCast(Me.BindingContext.Item(Me.DataSet1.Tables.Item("tblmeter")).Current, DataRowView) current.Delete() Me.DataSet1.tblMeter.AcceptChanges() Me.TblMeterTableAdapter.Update(Me.DataSet1.tblMeter) End Sub Code deletes records from datagrid but not updating. Any help

  Read the article

• MySQL: Storage of multiple text fields for a record

  - by Tom

  An inexperienced question: I need to store about 10 unknown-length text fields per record into a MySQL table. I expect no more than 50K rows in total for this table but speed is important. The database actions will be solely SELECTs for all practical purposes. I'm using InnoDB. In other words: id | text1 | text2 | text3 | .... | text10 As I understand that MySQL will store the text elsewhere and use its own indicators on the table itself, I'm wondering whether there's any fundamental performance implications that I should be worrying about given the way the data is stored? (i.e. several "sub-fetches" from the table). Thank you.

  Read the article

• Is it wise to use temporary tables?

  - by Industrial

  Hi guys, We have a mySQL database table for products. We are utilizing a cache layer to reduce database load, but we think that it's a good idea to minimize the actual data needed to be stored in the cache layer to speed up the application further. All the products in the database, that is visible to visitors have a price attached to them: The prices are stored in a different table, called prices . There are multiple price categories depending on which discount level each visitor (customer) applies to. From time to time, there are campaigns which means that a special price for each product is available. The special prices are stored in a table called specials. Is it a bad to make a temp table that binds the tables together? It would only have the neccessary information and would ofcourse be cached. -------------|-------------|------------ | productId | hasPrice | hasSpecial -------------|-------------|------------ 1 | 1 | 0 2 | 1 | 1 By doing such, it would be super easy to know if the specific product really has a price, without having to iterate through the complete prices or specials table each time a product should be listed or presented. Are temp tables a common thing for web applications or is it just bad design?

  Read the article

• how to get all column value from sphinx by configuration file php

  - by zahir hussain

  hi i want to know how to get all column value from table using sphinx search... i have configuration file, that file can get only one field from table. but i need all field value. where will i modify for getting all field from table. thanks and advance...

  Read the article

• Prettify working using python idle but not when using python script

  - by Loclip

  So when I use print soup.prettify() on idle it's prettifying my html but when I calling the script from server the prettify() not working #!/usr/bin/python import cgi, cgitb, urllib2, sys from bs4 import BeautifulSoup styles = [] i = 1 site = "www.example.com" page = urllib2.urlopen(site) soup = BeautifulSoup(page) table = soup.find('table', {'class' :'style5'}) alltd = table.findAll('td') allspans = table.findAll('span') while i<55: styles.append("style" + str(i)) i+=1 for td in alltd: if any(x in td["class"] for x in styles): td["class"] = "align" for span in allspans: span.replaceWithChildren() print "Content-type: text/html" print print "<!DOCTYPE html>" print "<html>" print "<head>" print '<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">' print '<link rel="stylesheet" href="lightbox/css/lightbox.css" type="text/css" media="screen">' print '<style type="text/css">' print "body {background-color:#b0c4de;}" print '.align {text-align: center;}' print "</style>" print "</head>" print "<body>" print table.pretiffy() print "</body>" print "</html>"

  Read the article

• Querying datatable to get rows with a certain value in the first column

  - by user1776590

  I am currently using the code below and am wondering if it would be possible to query based on an entry value. At the moment it returns the number of rows that have been defined. var q = sqlData.AsEnumerable().Take(2); This data comes in from a database and is imputed into the table but at the moment it only returns database data into the datatable and allows me to select the first two rows and I was wondering if I can query the data table so that I can get the rows that I require based on an index in the actual table itself (e.g. in the table I find five rows and query this information out).

  Read the article

• How to find/extract data from xml with jQuery

  - by darryl

  I'm trying to extract the StateLongName and StateShortName values from the xml below. I know there has to be a simple elegant way to do this with jQuery. <NewDataSet> <Table> <StateLongName>Alabama</StateLongName> <StateShortName>AL</StateShortName> </Table> <Table> <StateLongName>Alaska</StateLongName> <StateShortName>AK</StateShortName> </Table> ...elments removed for brevity </NewDataSet> Here's what I've tried. Load the xml from above into a Javascript variable name xml. Try #1 $(xml).find("TABLE").each(function() { var stateName = $(this).find("StateLongName").innerText; var stateCode = $(this).find("StateShortName").innerText; }); Try #1 doesn't find anything and never goes inside to load the stateName and stateCode variables. Try #2 $(xml).find("StateLongName").each(function() { var stateName = $(this).find("StateLongName").innerText; var stateCode = $(this).find("StateShortName").innerText; }); Try #2 does find matches, however the stateName and stateCode are left undefined. Try #3 $(xml).find("StateLongName").each(function() { var stateName = $($(xml).find('StateLongName').parent()[0].innerHTML)[1].data; var stateCode = $($(xml).find('StateLongName').parent()[0].innerHTML)[5].data; }); Try #3 works but there has to be a better way. Please enlighten me. Thanks for you time!

  Read the article

• Is there a way to delay compilation of a stored procedure's execution plan?

  - by Ian Henry

  (At first glance this may look like a duplicate of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/421275 or http://stackoverflow.com/questions/414336, but my actual question is a bit different) Alright, this one's had me stumped for a few hours. My example here is ridiculously abstracted, so I doubt it will be possible to recreate locally, but it provides context for my question (Also, I'm running SQL Server 2005). I have a stored procedure with basically two steps, constructing a temp table, populating it with very few rows, and then querying a very large table joining against that temp table. It has multiple parameters, but the most relevant is a datetime "@MinDate." Essentially: create table #smallTable (ID int) insert into #smallTable select (a very small number of rows from some other table) select * from aGiantTable inner join #smallTable on #smallTable.ID = aGiantTable.ID inner join anotherTable on anotherTable.GiantID = aGiantTable.ID where aGiantTable.SomeDateField > @MinDate If I just execute this as a normal query, by declaring @MinDate as a local variable and running that, it produces an optimal execution plan that executes very quickly (first joins on #smallTable and then only considers a very small subset of rows from aGiantTable while doing other operations). It seems to realize that #smallTable is tiny, so it would be efficient to start with it. This is good. However, if I make that a stored procedure with @MinDate as a parameter, it produces a completely inefficient execution plan. (I am recompiling it each time, so it's not a bad cached plan...at least, I sure hope it's not) But here's where it gets weird. If I change the proc to the following: declare @LocalMinDate datetime set @LocalMinDate = @MinDate --where @MinDate is still a parameter create table #smallTable (ID int) insert into #smallTable select (a very small number of rows from some other table) select * from aGiantTable inner join #smallTable on #smallTable.ID = aGiantTable.ID inner join anotherTable on anotherTable.GiantID = aGiantTable.ID where aGiantTable.SomeDateField > @LocalMinDate Then it gives me the efficient plan! So my theory is this: when executing as a plain query (not as a stored procedure), it waits to construct the execution plan for the expensive query until the last minute, so the query optimizer knows that #smallTable is small and uses that information to give the efficient plan. But when executing as a stored procedure, it creates the entire execution plan at once, thus it can't use this bit of information to optimize the plan. But why does using the locally declared variables change this? Why does that delay the creation of the execution plan? Is that actually what's happening? If so, is there a way to force delayed compilation (if that indeed is what's going on here) even when not using local variables in this way? More generally, does anyone have sources on when the execution plan is created for each step of a stored procedure? Googling hasn't provided any helpful information, but I don't think I'm looking for the right thing. Or is my theory just completely unfounded? Edit: Since posting, I've learned of parameter sniffing, and I assume this is what's causing the execution plan to compile prematurely (unless stored procedures indeed compile all at once), so my question remains -- can you force the delay? Or disable the sniffing entirely? The question is academic, since I can force a more efficient plan by replacing the select * from aGiantTable with select * from (select * from aGiantTable where ID in (select ID from #smallTable)) as aGiantTable Or just sucking it up and masking the parameters, but still, this inconsistency has me pretty curious.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336  | Next Page >