Search Results

Search found 27342 results on 1094 pages for 'sql denali'.

Page 347/1094 | < Previous Page | 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354  | Next Page >

• FreeText Query is slow - includes TOP and Order By

  - by Eric P

  The Product table has 700K records in it. The query: SELECT TOP 1 ID, Name FROM Product WHERE contains(Name, '"White Dress"') ORDER BY DateMadeNew desc takes about 1 minute to run. There is an non-clustered index on DateMadeNew and FreeText index on Name. If I remove TOP 1 or Order By - it takes less then 1 second to run. Here is the link to execution plan. http://screencast.com/t/ZDczMzg5N Looks like FullTextMatch has over 400K executions. Why is this happening? How can it be made faster?

  Read the article

• Foreach in sql with static data

  - by phenevo

  Hi, I have 3 tables: Countries: Code, Name Vacances: id(autoincrement),CountryCode, NameOfCountry, numberOfdays How to foreach country insert Row: countryCode,'Welcome in " + nameofCountry +"!",12

  Read the article

• Getting the most recent entry per group in a select statement

  - by TheObserver

  I have 3 tables to join to get table1.code, table1.series, table2.entry_date, table3.title1 and I'm trying to get the most recent non null table3.title1 grouped by table1.code and table1.series. select table1.code, table1.series, max(table2.entry_date), table3.Title1 from table3 INNER JOIN table2 ON table3.ID = table2.ID INNER JOIN table1 ON table2.source_code = table1.code where table3.Title1 is not NULL group by table1.code, table1.series, table3.Title1 seems to give me all entries with a non null title1 instead of the most recent one. How should I structure the query to just pick the newest version of Title1 per code & series?

  Read the article

• SQL Database dilemma : Optimize for Querying or Writing?

  - by Harry

  I'm working on a personal project (Search engine) and have a bit of a dilemma. At the moment it is optimized for writing data to the search index and significantly slow for search queries. The DTA (Database Engine Tuning Adviser) recommends adding a couple of Indexed views inorder to speed up search queries. But this is to the detriment of writing new data to the DB. It seems I can't have one without the other! This is obviously not a new problem. What is a good strategy for this issue?

  Read the article

• how to return multiple records from a view in sql server 2008

  - by kumarreddy

  i have a view which presently returning single record when called....i like it to return three records may be upon inner joining a different view or temp table...as those records share the same data except single column... im not sure about this plz some one throw light on this please..thank you in advance

  Read the article

• SQL - table alias scope.

  - by Support - multilanguage SO

  I've just learned ( yesterday ) to use "exists" instead of "in". BAD select * from table where nameid in ( select nameid from othertable where otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) GOOD select * from table t where exists ( select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) And I have some questions about this: 1) The explanation as I understood was: "The reason why this is better is because only the matching values will be returned instead of building a massive list of possible results". Does that mean that while the first subquery might return 900 results the second will return only 1 ( yes or no )? 2) In the past I have had the RDBMS complainin: "only the first 1000 rows might be retrieved", this second approach would solve that problem? 3) What is the scope of the alias in the second subquery?... does the alias only lives in the parenthesis? for example select * from table t where exists ( select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) AND select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeOtherDesc' ) That is, if I use the same alias ( o for table othertable ) In the second "exist" will it present any problem with the first exists? or are they totally independent? Is this something Oracle only related or it is valid for most RDBMS? Thanks a lot

  Read the article

• Create a complex SQL query?

  - by mazzzzz

  Hey guys, I have a program that allows me to run queries against a large database. I have two tables that are important right now, Deposits and withdraws. Each contains a history of every user. I need to take each table, add up every deposit and withdraws (per user), then subtract the withdraws from the deposits. I then need to return every user whos result is negative (aka they withdrew more then they deposited). Is this possible in one query? Example: Deposit Table: |ID|UserName|Amount| |1 | Use1 |100.00| |2 | Use1 |50.00 | |3 | Use2 |25.00 | |4 | Use1 | 5.00 | WithDraw Table: |ID|UserName|Amount| |2 | Use2 | 5.00 | |1 | Use1 |100.00| |4 | Use1 | 5.00 | |3 | Use2 |25.00 | So then the result would output: |OverWithdrawers| | Use2 | Is this possible (I sure don't know how to do it)? Thanks for any help, Max

  Read the article

• Stored Procedure - forcing execution order

  - by meepmeep

  I have a stored procedure that itself calls a list of other stored procedures in order: CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[prSuperProc] AS BEGIN EXEC [dbo].[prProc1] EXEC [dbo].[prProc2] EXEC [dbo].[prProc3] --etc END However, I sometimes have some strange results in my tables, generated by prProc2, which is dependent on the results generated by prProc1. If I manually execute prProc1, prProc2, prProc3 in order then everything is fine. It appears that when I run the top-level procedure, that Proc2 is being executed before Proc1 has completed and committed its results to the db. It doesn't always go wrong, but it seems to go wrong when Proc1 has a long execution time (in this case ~10s). How do I alter prSuperProc such that each procedure only executes once the preceding procedure has completed and committed? Transactions?

  Read the article

• SQL query trick

  - by wo_shi_ni_ba_ba

  I need to do select * from xxx where name in (a,b,c...); but I want the result set to be in the order of (a,b,c...) is this possible?

  Read the article

• SQL/ASP connection error

  - by tm1

  Line 10: Line 11: <asp:SqlDataSource ID="ac210db6" runat="server" Line 12: ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ac210db6ConnectionString %>" Line 13: SelectCommand="SELECT [cid] FROM [customers]"></asp:SqlDataSource><br /> The connection name 'ac210db6ConnectionString' was not found in the applications configuration or the connection string is empty. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The connection name 'ac210db6ConnectionString' was not found in the applications configuration or the connection string is empty. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• SQL-Join with NULL-columns

  - by tstenner

  I'm having the following tables: Table a +-------+------------------+------+-----+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | +-------+------------------+------+-----+ | bid | int(10) unsigned | YES | | | cid | int(10) unsigned | YES | | +-------+------------------+------+-----+ Table b +-------+------------------+------+ | Field | Type | Null | +-------+------------------+------+ | bid | int(10) unsigned | NO | | cid | int(10) unsigned | NO | | data | int(10) unsigned | NO | +-------+------------------+------+ When I want to select all rows from b where there's a corresponding bid/cid-pair in a, I simply use a natural join SELECT b.* FROM b NATURAL JOIN a; and everything is fine. When a.bid or a.cid is NULL, I want to get every row where the other column matches, e.g. if a.bid is NULL, I want every row where a.cid=b.cid, if both are NULL I want every column from b. My naive solution was this: SELECT DISTINCT b.* FROM b JOIN a ON ( ISNULL(a.bid) OR a.bid=b.bid ) AND (ISNULL(a.cid) OR a.cid=b.cid ) Is there any better way to to this?

  Read the article

• How do i find out in sql what db name I'm connect to

  - by gjutras

  We have a change control environment where the developers give scripts to change control people to run. we have dev,qa, & production environments. I want to conditionalize a couple segments to do some different things depending on what database the change control person is running my script. If @dbname='dev' then begin --do some dev stuff end If @dbname='QA' then begin --do some qa stuff end If @dbname='Prod' then begin --do some production stuff end How do I get at what the current connected database is and fill @dbname?

  Read the article

• Should i really use integer primary IDs [sql]

  - by arthurprs

  For example, i always generate an auto-increment field for the users table, but i also specifies an UNIQUE index on their usernames. There is situations that i first need to get the userId for a given username and then execute the desired query. Or use a JOIN in the desired query. It's 2 trips to the database or a JOIN vs. a varchar index The above is just an example There is a real performance benefit on INT over small VARCHAR indexes? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Subquery vs Traditional join with WHERE clause?

  - by BradC

  When joining to a subset of a table, any reason to prefer one of these formats over the other? Subquery version: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN (SELECT * FROM Classification WHERE CustomerType = 'Standard') AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID vs the WHERE clause at the end: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN Classification AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps AS s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID WHERE cf.CustomerType = 'Standard' The WHERE clause at the end feels more "traditional", but the first is arguably more clear, especially as the joins get increasingly complex. Only other reason I can think of to prefer the second is that the "SELECT *" on the first might be returning columns that aren't used later (In this case, I'd probably only need to return cf.Code and Cf.SalesRepID)

  Read the article

• T-SQL UPDATE trigger help

  - by Tan

  Hi iam trying to make an update trigger in my database. But i get this error every time the triggers trigs. Error MEssage: The row value(s) updated or deleted either do not make the row unique or they alter multiple rows(3rows) and heres my trigger ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[x1pk_qp_update] ON [dbo].[x1pk] FOR UPDATE AS BEGIN TRY DECLARE @UserId int , @PackareKod int , @PersSign varchar(10) SELECT @PackareKod = q_packarekod , @PersSign = q_perssign FROM INSERTED IF @PersSign IS NOT NULL BEGIN IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [QPMardskog].[dbo].[UserAccount] WHERE [Account] = @PackareKod) BEGIN SET @UserId = (SELECT [UserId] FROM [QPMardskog].[dbo].[UserAccount] WHERE [Account] = @PackareKod) UPDATE [QPMardskog].[dbo].[UserAccount] SET [Active] = 1 WHERE [Account] = @PackareKod UPDATE [QPMardskog].[dbo].[User] SET [Active] = 1 WHERE [Id] = @UserId END END END TRY But i only update one row in the table how can it says 3 rows. Please advise.

  Read the article

• How can I compare rows from 2 tables that have composite primary keys?

  - by cdeszaq

  Here's the scenario: I have 2 tables with data, one is the 2009 version and the other is the 2010 version. The primary key for each of the tables is a composite key. I know there is a different number of rows in each one and I need to find out the differences. Typically, in the "normal" primary key set-up, I would just look for primary key values NOT IN the list of primary keys from the other table. But I don't know how to do this with a composite primary key (or even if it's possible). So, how can I compare the rows from these two tables?

  Read the article

• Can I set ignore_dup_key on for a primary key?

  - by Mr. Flibble

  I have a two-column primary key on a table. I have attempted to alter it to set the ignore_dup_key to on with this command: ALTER INDEX PK_mypk on MyTable SET (IGNORE_DUP_KEY = ON); But I get this error: Cannot use index option ignore_dup_key to alter index 'PK_mypk' as it enforces a primary or unique constraint. How else should I set IGNORE_DUP_KEY to on?

  Read the article

• SQL Profiles showing high activity

  - by Wong Chi

  I am running my application locally -- ie. No external traffic and very low number of queries, fully under my control. I see tons of 'Audit Login' and 'Audit Logout' events. What are these and where are they actually stored (ie. Where is this audit log)? Are these a hint of a problem with connections, because I have only a simple connection string within my app and thought that connections would remain active throughout the operation of my app (ie. a single login at launch, and then a single logout when terminating).

  Read the article

• sql: including data from multiple columns

  - by every_answer_gets_a_point

  i have a table that looks like this: another words i would like to take data from columns stuff1, stuff2, and stuff3, and put them together

  Read the article

• start learning Proc(embedded sql with C)

  - by benjamin button

  Hi, I am basically working on unix and c programming. i want to start learning Pro*c on unix. Is there any good online tutorial which will help me start writing simple programs in pro*c and compiling those Pro*c files.? Thanks in advance for your help.

  Read the article

• Copy data from one SQL Server database table to the other

  - by lucky

  I don't know how to copy table data from one server - database - table TO other sever - database - table. If it is with in the same server and different databases, i have used the following SELECT * INTO DB1..TBL1 FROM DB2..TBL1 (to copy with table structure and data) INSERT INTO DB1..TBL1(F1, F2) SELECT F1, F2 FROM DB2..TBL1 (copy only data) Now my question is copy the data from SERVER1 -- DB1-- TBL1 to SERVER2 -- DB2 --TBL2

  Read the article

• SQL where clasue to work with Group by clasue after performing a count()

  - by Matt

  Tried my usual references at w3schools and google. No luck I'm trying to produce the following results. QTY is a derived column | Position | QTY -------------------- 1 Clerk 2 2 Mgr 2 Here's what I'm not having luck with: SELECT Position, Count(position) AS 'QTY' FROM tblemployee Where ('QTY' != 1) GROUP BY Position I know that my Position is set up as varchar(255) Count produces a integer data and my where clasue is accurate so that leads me to believe that that Count() is jamming me up. Please throw up an example so I can reference later. Thanks for the help!

  Read the article

• Snapshot on, still deadlocks, ROWLOCK

  - by Patto

  I turned snapshot isolation on in my database using the following code ALTER DATABASE MyDatabase SET ALLOW_SNAPSHOT_ISOLATION ON ALTER DATABASE MyDatabase SET READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT ON and got rid off lots of deadlocks. But my database still produces deadlocks, when I need to run a script every hour to clean up 100,000+ rows. Is there a way I can avoid deadlocks in my cleanup script, do I need to set ROWLOCK specifically in that query? Is there a way to increase the number of row level locks that a database uses? How are locks promoted? From row level to page level to table level? My delete script is rather simple: delete statvalue from statValue, (select dateadd(minute,-60, getdate()) as cutoff_date) cd where temporaryStat = 1 and entrydate < cutoff_date Right now I am looking for quick solution, but a long term solution would be even nicer. Thanks a lot, Patrikc

  Read the article

• Connecting to an MS SQL Server from Silverlight?

  - by cam

  Normally, I would use a PHP webservice to do this, but since the front-end is hosted on a linux box, I need another way to do this (so I don't have to go through the trouble of installing FreeTDS, etc. I will if I have to). Is there a better way to do this? I'm not a web guy, but I'm trying my best.

  Read the article

• Forcing LINQ to SQL to make one single call for all child rows

  - by zaph0d

  Let say I have a method (example taken from another post): public IQueryable<CityBlock> GetCityBlocks(){ var results = from o in db.city_blocks let buildings = GetBuildingsOnBlock(o.block_id) //returns Iqueryable select new CityBlock { BuildingsOnBlock = buildings, BlockOwner = o.block_owner }; return results; } In the calling method I add Skip() and Take() methods plus some filtering and then do a ToList(). The trouble is that I am getting dozens of database calls - one for all the city blocks and then a separate one for each building. Is there a way that I can refactor this code to just make two calls: one for the city blocks and one for all the buildings

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354  | Next Page >