Search Results

Search found 32641 results on 1306 pages for 'sql constraint and keys'.

Page 357/1306 | < Previous Page | 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364  | Next Page >

• SQL 2008 HierarchyID - Select X descendants down

  - by NTulip

  How can I query a table which has a column of data type HIERARCHYID and get a list of descendants X levels deep under an employee? Here is the current structure: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Employees]( [NodeId] [hierarchyid] NOT NULL, [EmployeeId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [FirstName] [varchar](120) NULL, [MiddleInitial] [varchar](1) NULL, [LastName] [varchar](120) NULL, [DepartmentId] [int] NULL, [Title] [varchar](120) NULL, [PhoneNumber] [varchar](20) NULL, [IM] [varchar](120) NULL, [Photo] [varbinary](max) NULL, [Bio] [varchar](400) NULL, [Active] [bit] NULL, [ManagerId] [int] NULL )

  Read the article

• More efficient left join of big table

  - by Zeus

  Hello, I have the following (simplified) query select P.peopleID, P.peopleName, ED.DataNumber from peopleTable P left outer join ( select PE.peopleID, PE.DataNumber from formElements FE inner join peopleExtra PE on PE.ElementID = FE.FormElementID where FE.FormComponentID = 42 ) ED on ED.peopleID = P.peopleID Without the sub-query this procedure takes ~7 seconds, but with it, it takes about 3minutes. Given that table peopleExtra is rather large, is there a more efficient way to do that join (short of restructuring the DB) ?

  Read the article

• Committing Transaction

  - by Costa

  Hi http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189797.aspx In this link they are committing a transaction within catch clause IF (XACT_STATE()) = 1, I don't get it, if there is an error why they are committing it? even if the problem in select statement and there is no big deal committing it, why don't just roll it back. Thanks

  Read the article

• SQL for sorting boolean column as true, null, false

  - by petehern

  My table has three boolean fields: f1, f2, f3. If I do SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY f1, f2, f3 the records will be sorted by these fields in the order false, true, null. I wish to order them with null in between true and false: the correct order should be true, null, false. I am using PostgreSQL.

  Read the article

• Datatype Conversion

  - by user87

  I am trying to execute the following Query select distinct pincode as Pincode,CAST(Date_val as DATE) as Date, SUM(cast(megh_38 as int)) as 'Postage Realized in Cash', SUM(cast(megh_39 as int)) as 'MO Commission', from dbo.arrow_dtp_upg group by pincode,Date_Val but I am getting an error "Conversion failed when converting the nvarchar value '82.25' to data type int." Am I using a wrong data type?

  Read the article

• SQL Querying for Threaded Messages

  - by Harper

  My site has a messaging feature where one user may message another. The messages support threading - a parent message may have any number of children but only one level deep. The messages table looks like this: Messages - Id (PK, Auto-increment int) - UserId (FK, Users.Id) - FromUserId (FK, Users.Id) - ParentMessageId (FK to Messages.Id) - MessageText (varchar 200) I'd like to show messages on a page with each 'parent' message followed by a collapsed view of the children messages. Can I use the GROUP BY clause or similar construct to retrieve parent messages and children messages all in one query? Right now I am retrieving parent messages only, then looping through them and performing another query for each to get all related children messages. I'd like to get messages like this: Parent1 Child1 Child2 Child3 Parent2 Child1 Parent3 Child1 Child2

  Read the article

• heirarchial data from self referencing table in tree form

  - by Beta033

  Ii looks like this has been asked and answered in all the simple cases, excluding the one that i'm having trouble with. I've tried using a recursive CTE to generate this, however maybe a cursor would be better? or maybe a set of recursive functions will do the trick? Can this be done in a cte? consider the following table PrimaryKey ParentKey 1 NULL 2 1 3 6 4 7 5 2 6 1 7 NULL should yield PK 1 -2 --5 -6 --3 7 -4 where the number of - marks equal the depth, my primary difficulty is the ordering.

  Read the article

• oracle sql query to list all the dates of previous month

  - by Suresh S

  Guys i have a requirement to list all the dates of the previous month like below 20101201 20101202 20101203 20101204 20101205 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 20101231 kindly let me know if any better way to do than this query. select TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')-1,'YYYYMMDD')-(level-1) as EACH_DATE from dual A connect by level < (TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')-1,'DD'))+1) Also please let me know the problem with this query it says "missing right parenthesis" SELECT /*+ PARALLEL (A,8) */ /*+ DRIVING_STATE */ TO_CHAR(TRUNC(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')-1,'MM'),'MONYYYY') "MONTH", TYPE AS "TRAFF", COLUMN, A_COUN AS "A_COUNT",COST FROM DATA_P B WHERE EXISTS ( select TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')-1,'YYYYMMDD')-(level-1)) EACH_DATE from dual A connect by level < TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')-1,'DD')+1) WHERE A.EACH_DATE = B.DATE order by EACH_DATE ASC )

  Read the article

• SQL Server Reporting Services Bar Chart

  - by Avitus

  I am trying to create horizontal bar chart to look like a pill chart. I would like to take a either a stacked bar chart or a 100% stacked bar chart and put rounded ends onto this chart. I would only be using 1 row within the chart. One idea I had was just putting rounded images on either end of the chart to accomplish this but I'm not sure that this will give the smooth feel of a single pill. Does anyone have a good suggestion? I am not tied to the idea of using a chart object. But I would prefer to stay away from third party components that need to be purchased.

  Read the article

• SQL: Get count of rows returned from a left join

  - by Rogue Coder

  I have two tables, one called calendars and one called events. There can be multiple calendars, and multiple events in a calendar. I want to select every calendar, also getting the number of events in the calendar. Right now I have : SELECT C.*, COUNT(*) AS events FROM `calendars` AS C LEFT JOIN `events` E ON C.ID=E.calendar GROUP BY C.ID But that doesn't work. Items with no events still return 1. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• SQL, problem with OrderBy / GroupBy

  - by Tristan

  Hi, In my table I have two fields among others : article_id and *version* *example: article_id : 5 // version 1 aricle_id: 5 // version 2 article_id: 6 // version 1* What i want to do is to retrieve the latest version for each article id (in my example i want to retrieve the article 5 version 2 object and article 6 and version 1 object). The problem is that mysql is doing the groupBy instead of the OrderBy so it returns to me the FIRST version of each article, but i want the opposit. Do you have an idea please ?

  Read the article

• SQL INSERT performance omitting field names?

  - by Marco Demaio

  Does anyone knows if removing the field names from an INSERT query results in some performance improvements? I mean is this: INSERT INTO table1 VALUES (value1, value2, ...) faster for DB to be accomplished rather than doing this: INSERT INTO table1 (field1, field2, ...) VALUES (value1, value2, ...) ? I know it might be probably a meaningless performance difference, but just to know.

  Read the article

• The Best Way to shred XML data into SQL Server database columns

  - by eddiegroves

  What is the best way to shred XML data into various database columns? So far I have mainly been using the nodes and value functions like so: INSERT INTO some_table (column1, column2, column3) SELECT Rows.n.value('(@column1)[1]', 'varchar(20)'), Rows.n.value('(@column2)[1]', 'nvarchar(100)'), Rows.n.value('(@column3)[1]', 'int'), FROM @xml.nodes('//Rows') Rows(n) However I find that this is getting very slow for even moderate size xml data.

  Read the article

• SQL Trigger dont works...

  - by Gabotron

  Is there a way in which a Trigger is not fired? We have this situation: We have a table and there are rows that are been deleted. We need to know who and/or when these row are deleted. We create this trigger: ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[AUDITdel_nit] ON [dbo].[Client] FOR DELETE AS Insert into AUDIT select 'Delete', getdate(), 'Row Deleted', SYSTEM_USER, host_name(), (select 'ID Client: ' + convert(varchar(12),Id) from deleted), 'Client' ,APP_NAME() We made somte test: deleting rows vis stored procedures and the deleted rows appears in our AUDIT table. But suddenly today we found a row deleted that dont appears in the AUDIT table... Any idea how it can be done?

  Read the article

• Oracle (Old?) Joins - A tool for conversion?

  - by Grasper

  I have been porting oracle selects, and I have been running across a lot of queries like so: SELECT e.last_name, d.department_name FROM employees e, departments d WHERE e.department_id(+) = d.department_id; ...and: SELECT last_name, d.department_id FROM employees e, departments d WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id(+); Are there any guides/tutorials for converting all of the variants of the (+) syntax? What is that syntax even called (so I can scour google)? Even better.. Is there a tool that will do this conversion for me? When was this standard phased out? Any info is appreciated.

  Read the article

• How to work with CTE. There is some error related to anchor.

  - by Shantanu Gupta

  I am creating a hierarchy representaion of a column. But an error occurs Details are Msg 240, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Types don't match between the anchor and the recursive part in column "DISPLAY" of recursive query "CTE". I know there is some typecasting error. But I dont know how to remove error. Please just dont only sort out my error. I need explanation why this error is coming. When this error occurs. I am trying to sort table on the basis of sort col that i m introducing. I want to add '-' at every level and want to sort accordingly. Please help WITH CTE (PK_CATEGORY_ID, [DESCRIPTION], FK_CATEGORY_ID, DISPLAY, SORT, DEPTH) AS ( SELECT PK_CATEGORY_ID, [DESCRIPTION], FK_CATEGORY_ID, '-' AS DISPLAY, '--' AS SORT, 0 AS DEPTH FROM dbo.L_CATEGORY_TYPE WHERE FK_CATEGORY_ID IS NULL UNION ALL SELECT T.PK_CATEGORY_ID, T.[DESCRIPTION], T.FK_CATEGORY_ID, CAST(DISPLAY+T.[DESCRIPTION] AS VARCHAR(1000)), '--' AS SORT, C.DEPTH +1 FROM dbo.L_CATEGORY_TYPE T JOIN CTE C ON C.PK_CATEGORY_ID = T.FK_CATEGORY_ID --SELECT T.PK_CATEGORY_ID, C.SORT+T.[DESCRIPTION], T.FK_CATEGORY_ID --, CAST('--' + C.SORT AS VARCHAR(1000)) AS SORT, CAST(DEPTH +1 AS INT) AS DEPTH --FROM dbo.L_CATEGORY_TYPE T JOIN CTE C ON C.FK_CATEGORY_ID = T.PK_CATEGORY_ID ) SELECT PK_CATEGORY_ID, [DESCRIPTION], FK_CATEGORY_ID, DISPLAY, SORT, DEPTH FROM CTE ORDER BY SORT

  Read the article

• Assigining ID vs object - linq to sql

  - by jess

  Say, I have an entity Customer which has relationship with city,order etc.Now,when I am adding a customer object,should I assign customer.cityid, or customer.city? Now,from form I get cityid from dropdown,to assign city object,I will have to make a query using id selected.

  Read the article

• Is it possible to write a database view that encompasses one-to-many relationships?

  - by Brandon Linton

  So I'm not necessarily saying this is even a good idea if it were possible, since the schema of the view would be extremely volatile, but is there any way to represent a has-many relationship in a single view? For example, let's say I have a customer that can have any number of addresses in the database. Is there any way to list out each column of each address with perhaps a number as a part of the alias (e.g., columns like Customer Id, Name, Address_Street_1, Address_Street_2, etc)? Thanks!

  Read the article

• SQL Timstamp Function

  - by harrison

  Is there any difference between these two queries? select * from tbl where ts < '9999-12-31-24.00.00.000000'; and select * from tbl where ts < timestamp('9999-12-31-24.00.00.000000'); When is the timestamp function required? Is there a difference in performance?

  Read the article

• SQL Query over three different tables

  - by choise

  i got three tables CATS id name ------------------------------ 1 category1 2 category2 3 category3 4 category4 PRODUCT id name ------------------------------ 1 product1 2 product2 ZW-CAT-PRODUCT id_cats id_product ------------------------------ 1 1 3 1 4 2 now i want to get my products and their categories product1 => category1,category3 product2 => category4 is there a way to get this array (or object or something) with one mysql query? i tried a bit with JOINS, but it seems thats this is not exactly what i need, or? currently i'm using 3 querys (i think thats too much). any suggestions?

  Read the article

• Problem with Oracle/SQL ORDER BY Statement

  - by ArneRie

  Hi, i have the following content inside an varchar2 column: 10.1.2.3 10.2.3.4 8.3.4.1 8.3.2.1 4.2.1.3 4.3.2.1 9.3.1.2 When i query the database i need an result ordered: 4.... 8.... 9.... 10... the NLS_SORT parameter is set to german, an simple "order by COLUMN DESC/ASC" is not working like excepted. It returns 10..... 8...... 9...... any suggestions?

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2005 Computed Column Is Persisted

  - by hilary

  I have some computed columns in a table and need to know if I should set Is Persisted to true. What are the advantages? Are there any disadvantages? What does 'Is Persisted' mean?

  Read the article

• Sql Distinct Count of resulting table with no conditionals

  - by AfterImage

  Hello everyone, I want to count the number of accounts from the resulting table generated from this code. This way, I know how many people liked blue at one time. Select Distinct PEOPLE.FullName, PEOPLE.FavColor From PEOPLE Where FavColor='Blue' Lets say this is a history accounting of what people said their favorite color when they were asked so there may be multiple records of the same full name if asked again at a much later time; hence the distinct. The code I used may not be reusable in your answer so feel free to use what you think can work. I am sure I found a possible solution to my problem using declare and if statements but I lost that page... so I am left with no solution. However, I think there is a way to do it without using conditionals which is what I am asking and rather have. Thanks. Edit: My question is: From the code above, is there a way to count the number of accounts in the resulting table?

  Read the article

• Insert hex string value to sql server image field is appending extra 0

  - by rotary_engine

  Have an image field and want to insert into this from a hex string: insert into imageTable(imageField) values(convert(image, 0x3C3F78...)) however when I run select the value is return with an extra 0 as 0x03C3F78... This extra 0 is causing a problem in another application, I dont want it. How to stop the extra 0 being added? The schema is: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[templates]( [templateId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [templateName] [nvarchar](50) NOT NULL, [templateBody] [image] NOT NULL, [templateType] [int] NULL) and the query is: insert into templates(templateName, templateBody, templateType) values('I love stackoverflow', convert(image, 0x3C3F786D6C2076657273696F6E3D.......), 2) the actual hex string is quite large to post here.

  Read the article

• nested join linq-to-sql queries

  - by ile

  var result = ( from contact in db.Contacts where contact.ContactID == id join referContactID in db.ContactRefferedBies on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID orderby contact.ContactID descending select new ContactReferredByView { ContactReferredByID = referContactID.ContactReferredByID, ContactReferredByName = referContactName.FirstName + " " + referContactName.LastName }).Single(); Problem is in this line: join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID where referContactID.ContactID is called from the above join line. How to nest these two joins? Thanks in advance! Ile

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364  | Next Page >