Search Results

Search found 57471 results on 2299 pages for 'jonrichco yahoo com au'.

Page 36/2299 | < Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >

  • Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft, participez au Quiz sur Developpez et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia Lumia

    Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft participez au Quiz et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia LumiaEn exclusivité pour les lecteurs de Developpez.com, l'équipe de la plateforme Cloud Azure de Microsoft a préparé des vidéos, tutoriels et bien d'autres que nous partageons chaque semaine.À la fin de chaque semaine, des questions vous seront posées. Tous ceux qui auront au minimum 80 % de bonnes réponses gagneront un t-shirt et seront de facto sélectionnés pour un...

    Read the article

  • Chrome 9 disponible avec le support natif de WebGL, l'accès au Chrome Marketplace et Google Instant pour surfer plus vite

    Chrome 9 est disponible Avec le support en natif de WebGL, l'accès au Chrome Marketplace et Google Instant pour surfer plus vite Mise à jour du 07/02/11 Chrome 9 est sorti. La nouvelle version du navigateur de Google (qui vient de se payer une deuxième campagne de publicité et d'affichage dans le métro parisien) propose trois grandes nouveautés qui seront familières aux lecteurs de Développez. Chrome 9 introduit dans le canal officiel WebGL (pour les animations 3D, les contenus Internet riches et l'accélération graphique), l'accès au Chrome Web Store (dont l'utilité sera surto...

    Read the article

  • Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft, participez au Quiz sur Developpez et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia Lumia

    Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft participez au Quiz et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia LumiaEn exclusivité pour les lecteurs de Developpez.com, l'équipe de la plateforme Cloud Azure de Microsoft a préparé des vidéos, tutoriels et bien d'autres que nous partageons chaque semaine.À la fin de chaque semaine, des questions vous seront posées. Tous ceux qui auront au minimum 80% de bonnes réponses gagneront un t-shirt et seront de facto sélectionnés pour un...

    Read the article

  • Apple ne payera aucun impôt au Royaume-Uni sur 2012, en France les géants de l'IT ne payeraient que 1 % de l'impôt dont ils devraient s'acquitter

    Apple ne payera pas d'impôt au Royaume-Uni sur 2012 En France les géants de l'IT payent 1 % de ce qu'ils devraient d'après le Conseil National du NumériqueDans la continuité des débats sur l'optimisation fiscale (ou « évasion » selon les points de vue), une information risque de faire grincer quelques dents supplémentaires un peu partout en Europe. Apple n'a payé aucun impôt sur les sociétés cette année (exercice 2012) au Royaume-Uni.Comme d'habitude, les mécanismes de transfert de bénéfices via des jeux de filiales basées dans des paradis fiscaux et de facturation de droits d'exploitation de propriétés intellectuelles sont montrés du doigt...

    Read the article

  • Facebook dépasse les 2 milliards de dollars de chiffre d'affaires au 3e trimestre, le mobile représente presque la moitié des revenus sur la période

    Facebook dépasse les 2 milliards de dollars de chiffre d'affaires au 3e trimestre, le mobile représente presque la moitié des revenus sur la période Facebook vient de publier un chiffre d'affaires de 2,02 milliards de dollars au troisième trimestre 2013 et enregistre ainsi une progression de 60 % pour un bénéfice net de 425 millions de dollars. Une belle performance en matière de rentabilité en comparaison à la perte que le réseau social à connu l'année passée pour la même période qui s'élevait...

    Read the article

  • Windows Phone 7 : des utilisateurs victimes de consommation fictive de données, Microsoft prend le problème très au sérieux

    Windows Phone 7 : des utilisateurs victimes de consommation fictive de données Microsoft prend le problème très au sérieux et enquête Microsoft a déclaré à la BBC qu'il était en train d'enquêter sur un problème de consommation élevée de données dont sont victimes les utilisateurs des téléphones sous Windows Phone 7. L'enquête fait suite aux plaintes de plusieurs utilisateurs dont les téléphones auraient transmis et réceptionnés une quantité importante de données sans que ceux-ci ne soient au courant. Certains s'en sont aperçus après avoir reçu un message d'avertissement les informant qu'ils avaient presque atteint la limite de consommation qui leur était permis alors qu'ils...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft centralise les services du Windows Store au sein d'une plateforme unique, pour éviter aux développeurs des pertes de temps inutiles

    Microsoft centralise les services du Windows Store au sein d'une plateforme unique pour éviter aux développeurs des pertes de temps inutilesLes développeurs occupent une place de choix au sein de l'écosystème Microsoft. La firme jusqu'ici a toujours montré son ambition de vouloir offrir à ceux-ci des outils simples pour le développement, la monétisation et le suivi des applications sur le Windows Store.C'est dans cette optique que la société présente se nouvelle plateforme unique qui centralise tous les services pouvant être utilisés sur la galerie d'applications pour Windows.Le but de cette initiative est d'éviter aux développeurs des pertes de temps inutiles dans la recherche d'un kit de dévelo...

    Read the article

  • Chrome : Google continuera le support du navigateur sur XP au moins jusqu'en 2015, un an après l'arrêt officiel du support de l'OS

    Chrome : Google continuera le support du navigateur sur XP au moins jusqu'en 2015, un an après l'arrêt officiel du support de l'OS En dépit de l'annonce faite par Microsoft d'arrêter le support de Windows XP le 8 avril 2014, Google a annoncé prolonger le support de Chrome sur l'OS d'au moins un an. Ainsi, jusqu'en avril 2015, Google continuera de proposer des mises à jour et correctifs de sécurité pour Chrome.Rappelons que NetApplication situe encore la part des utilisateurs Windows XP à plus...

    Read the article

  • Mozilla propose au W3C des icônes pour améliorer la confidentialité des données sur le Net, reste à convaincre les sites de les adopter

    Mozilla propose au W3C des icônes pour améliorer la confidentialité Des données sur le Net, reste à convaincre les entreprises de les intégrer à leurs sites Des icônes pour alerter l'internaute sur l'utilisation potentielle de ses données privées, c'est ce que prépare la fondation Mozilla qui a organisé un groupe de travail pour formuler une proposition au W3C. Aujourd'hui, ces icônes passent en version alpha et Aza Raskin, expert des interfaces hommes machine (à l'origine du concept de Tab Candy sur Firefox notamme...

    Read the article

  • Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft, participez au Quiz et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia Lumia

    Windows Azure : consultez les ressources proposées par Microsoft participez au Quiz et gagnez des t-shirts et peut-être un Nokia LumiaEn exclusivité pour les lecteurs de Developpez.com, l'équipe de la plateforme Cloud Azure de Microsoft a préparé des vidéos, tutoriels et bien d'autres que nous partageons chaque semaine.En début de la semaine suivante, des questions vous seront posées. Tous ceux qui auront au minimum 80 % de bonnes réponses gagneront un t-shirt et seront de facto sélectionnés pour...

    Read the article

  • OpenSSL sera audité et maintenu à plein temps par deux développeurs, 5,4 millions de $ alloués au financement de projets open source critiques

    Le consortium CII finance deux développeurs et un audit pour sécuriser OpenSSL 5,4 millions de dollars alloués au financement de projets open source critiquesPlus d'un mois après l'annonce de la création du consortium CII (Core Infrastructure Initiative) en réponse au tollé provoqué par la faille d'OpenSSL Heartbleed, une feuille de route a été émise. Le but de la manoeuvre est de financer certains projets libres pour les auditer ainsi que détecter et corriger leurs bugs.Dirigé par la fondation...

    Read the article

  • Samsung crée F2FS, un nouveau système de fichiers open source pour mémoire Flash qui sera intégré au noyau Linux

    Samsung crée F2FS son nouveau système de fichiers open source pour mémoire flash qui sera intégré au noyau Linux Samsung a mis au point un nouveau système de fichiers destiné aux supports de stockage flash. Les systèmes de fichiers anciens qui sont actuellement utilisés pour le stockage sur les mémoires flash NAND très répandues sur les terminaux mobiles présentent des limites assez importantes. Certains constructeurs de smartphones comme RIM ou encore Sharp ont été obligés de se tourner vers le système de fichiers propriétaire Extended File Allocation Table (exFAT) de Microsoft contre payement de redevances.

    Read the article

  • Google met fin au support d'Internet Explorer 9 pour ses applications, suite à la sortie d'IE 11

    Google met fin au support d'Internet Explorer 9 pour ses applications suite à la sortie d'IE 11Google a annoncé qu'il ne prendra plus en charge le navigateur Internet Explorer 9 pour ses services Web et Cloud Google Apps.Dans un billet de blog, l'éditeur fait savoir qu'il mettra fin au support du navigateur pour Google Apps, suite à la publication de Windows 8.1 avec le nouveau Internet Explorer 11 le 17 octobre dernier.Les utilisateurs d'IE9 pourront rencontrer des problèmes de compatibilité avec...

    Read the article

  • Pas de BlackBerry 10 pour la tablette PlayBook contrairement aux promesses, BlackBerry affiche des résultats mitigés au premier trimestre 2013

    Pas de BlackBerry 10 pour la tablette PlayBook Contrairement aux promesses, BlackBerry affiche des résultats mitigés au premier trimestreSelon le point de vue, on dira que BlackBerry (ex-RIM) va mieux, ou qu'il va moins mal mais que ce n'est toujours pas cela.En affichant une perte de 84 millions de dollars, l'entreprise canadienne n'a en tout cas pas rassuré les analystes.Les résultats de ce premier trimestre étaient particulièrement attendus puisqu'ils traduisent, pour la première fois de manière concrète, l'accueil fait par le public au nouveau système BlackBerry 10.Problème, le constructeur n'a écoulé que 2.7 millions de Z10, malgré les campagnes de publicité et les opérations de co...

    Read the article

  • Un quart de milliard de smartphones vendus au troisième trimestre, Android et iOS peinent à gagner des parts pendant que Windows Phone progresse

    Un quart de milliard de smartphones vendus au troisième trimestre, Android et iOS peinent à gagner des parts pendant que Windows Phone progresse Les rapports de vente de smartphones au troisième trimestre de l'année en cours se multiplient. Cette fois-ci, c'est l'entreprise indépendante d'analyse Canalys qui révèle à son tour une augmentation annuelle de 44% du marché. Cette proportion représente un quart de milliards de dispositifs écoulés en un trimestre sur la planète. Sans surprise,...

    Read the article

  • GWT - occasional com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException

    - by user214984
    Hello we are haunted by occasional occurences of exceptions such as: com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: Type 'xxx' was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer.For security purposes, this type will not be serialized.: instance = xxx at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter.serialize(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:610) at com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.impl.AbstractSerializationStreamWriter.writeObject(AbstractSerializationStreamWriter.java:129) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter$ValueWriter$8.write(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:152) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.impl.ServerSerializationStreamWriter.serializeValue(ServerSerializationStreamWriter.java:534) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponse(RPC.java:609) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponseForSuccess(RPC.java:467) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.invokeAndEncodeResponse(RPC.java:564) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.processCall(RemoteServiceServlet.java:188) at de.softconex.travicemanager.server.TraviceManagerServiceImpl.processCall(TraviceManagerServiceImpl.java:615) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RemoteServiceServlet.processPost(RemoteServiceServlet.java:224) at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.AbstractRemoteServiceServlet.doPost(AbstractRemoteServiceServlet.java:62) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:710) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:230) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAssociationValve.java:179) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.java:84) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConnectionValve.java:157) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:262) at org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProcessor.process(AjpAprProcessor.java:419) at org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProtocol$AjpConnectionHandler.process(AjpAprProtocol.java:378) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Worker.run(AprEndpoint.java:1508) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) The application is normally running fine. The indicated class implements Serializable (the whole object graph). So far the only patterns / observations are: we seem to have the issue only when the application is used inside an iframe the problem seems to happen when a new version of the application has been deployed running firefox in privacy mode (disabling all caches etc.) doesn't fix the problem Any ideas? Holger

    Read the article

  • ExpressionEngine Segment Variables Lost on Site Index Page

    - by Jesse Bunch
    Hey Everyone, I've been messing with this for days now and can't seem to figure it out. I am trying to pass a 2nd segment variable to my client's index page. The URL I'm trying is: http://www.compupay.com/site/CSCPA/. The problem is, rather than showing the site's index page with the segment variable of "CSCPA" still in the URL, it shows the index page with no segment variables. Initially, I thought it was a .htaccess problem but I couldn't find anything in it that seemed out of whack. Any ideas? I am posting the .htaccess file so another pair of eyes can see it. Thanks for the help! # -- LG .htaccess Generator Start -- # .htaccess generated by LG .htaccess Generator v1.0.0 # http://leevigraham.com/cms-customisation/expressionengine/addon/lg-htaccess-generator/ # secure .htaccess file <Files .htaccess> order allow,deny deny from all </Files> # Dont list files in index pages IndexIgnore * #URL Segment Support AcceptPathInfo On Options +FollowSymLinks #Redirect old incoming links Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/online_payroll/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /news101507.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ #Redirect for old top linked to pages Redirect 301 /Payroll_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /About_CompuPay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /Partnerships.cfm http://www.compupay.com/business_partner_solutions/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm?subpage=393 http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /After_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Accountant_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /careers/careers_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/careers/ Redirect 301 /Industry_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/ Redirect 301 /Client_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /client_resources.cfm?subpage=375 http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_PowerPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/powerpayroll/ Redirect 301 /Payroll_Outsourcing.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/why_outsource/ Redirect 301 /Phone_Payroll_Fax_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/phone_fax_payroll/ Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/iowa_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Construction_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/specialty_payroll/ Redirect 301 /PC_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/pc_payroll/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /accountant_services.cfm?subpage=404 http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=361 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=362 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=363 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=364 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=365 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=366 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=367 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=368 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=369 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=416 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payload_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/payload/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=358 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=399 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=409 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=413 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=418 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / # Remove the www # RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC] # RewriteRule ^ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301] # Force www RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.compupay.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.compupay.com/$1 [R=301,L] # Add a trailing slash to paths without an extension RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,5}|/)$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1/ [L,R=301] #Legacy Partner Link Redirect RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} partnerCode=(.*) [NC] RewriteRule compupay_payroll.cfm site/%1? [R=301,L] # Catch any remaining requests for .cfm files RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.cfm RewriteRule ^.*$ http://www.compupay.com/ [R=301,L] #Expression Engine RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /index.php?/$1 [L] AcceptPathInfo On </IfModule> # Remove IE image toolbar <FilesMatch "\.(html|htm|php)$"> Header set imagetoolbar "no" </FilesMatch> # enable gzip compression <FilesMatch "\.(js|css|php)$"> SetOutputFilter DEFLATE </FilesMatch> #Deal with ETag <IfModule mod_headers.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif)$"> Header unset Last-Modified </FilesMatch> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css|swf)$"> Header unset ETag FileETag None Header set Cache-Control "public" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> <IfModule mod_expires.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|css|js)$"> ExpiresActive on ExpiresDefault "access plus 1 year" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> #Force Download PDFs <FilesMatch "\.(?i:pdf)$"> ForceType application/octet-stream Header set Content-Disposition attachment </FilesMatch> #Increase Upload Size php_value upload_max_filesize 5M php_value post_max_size 5M # -- LG .htaccess Generator End --

    Read the article

  • How do I get the intellisense in FoxPro 8 to work with .net COM objects?

    - by IsaacB
    Hi, I'm at my wit's end with this. What I'm doing is making a C# dll file that needs to have some methods exposed to FoxPro 8. This guy here http://www.west-wind.com/presentations/VfpDotNetInterop/DotNetFromVFP.asp says that you can put [ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.AutoDual)] in front of the (C# in my case) class, and then intellisense in Foxpro magically works. I'm accessing the COM object fine in FoxPro, but unfortunately the intellisense doesn't work, and it's annoying me. Is there some other step I'm missing to this? Is there some registry entry to look for to confirm that the methods are exposed properly (for intellisense to work)? Are there other steps in Foxpro that I'm supposed to follow (I don't know a thing about FoxPro!) It might be a pretty obscure question these days, but someone on here must know the answer! Thanks

    Read the article

  • How do I free SQLServerCE's COM instance from the current running process?

    - by David Thornley
    It's been a while since I touched COM so be nice ;) This is under WindowsCE 5.0 with SQLServerCE 2.0. After calling this to load SQLServerCE 2.0 : - IDBInitialize *pIDBInitialize = NULL; CoCreateInstance(CLSID_SQLSERVERCE_2_0, NULL, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER, IID_IDBInitialize, (void**)&pIDBInitialize); Module load occurs for SSCE20.dll which obviously loads the SQLServerCE engine into the process space. What I don't understand is if I do this immediately after :- pIDBInitialize->Release(); I don't see a dll module unload, so that SSCE20.dll (and friends) are still loaded into my process. Now I tried CoFreeUnusedLibraries() which I figure forces COM to purge any unused libraries, but it doesn't seem to do the trick. At runtime I want to be able to completely unload the SQLServerCE 2.0 dll from the process to streamline an upgrade to 3.5SP1. I suspect this has something to do with the shared dll model that Microsoft use under WindowsCE... but, I might be wrong :) Thanks in advance, David.

    Read the article

  • Unable to cast transparent proxy to type &lt;type&gt;

    - by Rick Strahl
    This is not the first time I've run into this wonderful error while creating new AppDomains in .NET and then trying to load types and access them across App Domains. In almost all cases the problem I've run into with this error the problem comes from the two AppDomains involved loading different copies of the same type. Unless the types match exactly and come exactly from the same assembly the typecast will fail. The most common scenario is that the types are loaded from different assemblies - as unlikely as that sounds. An Example of Failure To give some context, I'm working on some old code in Html Help Builder that creates a new AppDomain in order to parse assembly information for documentation purposes. I create a new AppDomain in order to load up an assembly process it and then immediately unload it along with the AppDomain. The AppDomain allows for unloading that otherwise wouldn't be possible as well as isolating my code from the assembly that's being loaded. The process to accomplish this is fairly established and I use it for lots of applications that use add-in like functionality - basically anywhere where code needs to be isolated and have the ability to be unloaded. My pattern for this is: Create a new AppDomain Load a Factory Class into the AppDomain Use the Factory Class to load additional types from the remote domain Here's the relevant code from my TypeParserFactory that creates a domain and then loads a specific type - TypeParser - that is accessed cross-AppDomain in the parent domain:public class TypeParserFactory : System.MarshalByRefObject,IDisposable { …/// <summary> /// TypeParser Factory method that loads the TypeParser /// object into a new AppDomain so it can be unloaded. /// Creates AppDomain and creates type. /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public TypeParser CreateTypeParser() { if (!CreateAppDomain(null)) return null; /// Create the instance inside of the new AppDomain /// Note: remote domain uses local EXE's AppBasePath!!! TypeParser parser = null; try { Assembly assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly(); string assemblyPath = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location; parser = (TypeParser) this.LocalAppDomain.CreateInstanceFrom(assemblyPath, typeof(TypeParser).FullName).Unwrap(); } catch (Exception ex) { this.ErrorMessage = ex.GetBaseException().Message; return null; } return parser; } private bool CreateAppDomain(string lcAppDomain) { if (lcAppDomain == null) lcAppDomain = "wwReflection" + Guid.NewGuid().ToString().GetHashCode().ToString("x"); AppDomainSetup setup = new AppDomainSetup(); // *** Point at current directory setup.ApplicationBase = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory; //setup.PrivateBinPath = Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "bin"); this.LocalAppDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain(lcAppDomain,null,setup); // Need a custom resolver so we can load assembly from non current path AppDomain.CurrentDomain.AssemblyResolve += new ResolveEventHandler(CurrentDomain_AssemblyResolve); return true; } …} Note that the classes must be either [Serializable] (by value) or inherit from MarshalByRefObject in order to be accessible remotely. Here I need to call methods on the remote object so all classes are MarshalByRefObject. The specific problem code is the loading up a new type which points at an assembly that visible both in the current domain and the remote domain and then instantiates a type from it. This is the code in question:Assembly assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly(); string assemblyPath = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location; parser = (TypeParser) this.LocalAppDomain.CreateInstanceFrom(assemblyPath, typeof(TypeParser).FullName).Unwrap(); The last line of code is what blows up with the Unable to cast transparent proxy to type <type> error. Without the cast the code actually returns a TransparentProxy instance, but the cast is what blows up. In other words I AM in fact getting a TypeParser instance back but it can't be cast to the TypeParser type that is loaded in the current AppDomain. Finding the Problem To see what's going on I tried using the .NET 4.0 dynamic type on the result and lo and behold it worked with dynamic - the value returned is actually a TypeParser instance: Assembly assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly(); string assemblyPath = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location; object objparser = this.LocalAppDomain.CreateInstanceFrom(assemblyPath, typeof(TypeParser).FullName).Unwrap(); // dynamic works dynamic dynParser = objparser; string info = dynParser.GetVersionInfo(); // method call works // casting fails parser = (TypeParser)objparser; So clearly a TypeParser type is coming back, but nevertheless it's not the right one. Hmmm… mysterious.Another couple of tries reveal the problem however:// works dynamic dynParser = objparser; string info = dynParser.GetVersionInfo(); // method call works // c:\wwapps\wwhelp\wwReflection20.dll (Current Execution Folder) string info3 = typeof(TypeParser).Assembly.CodeBase; // c:\program files\vfp9\wwReflection20.dll (my COM client EXE's folder) string info4 = dynParser.GetType().Assembly.CodeBase; // fails parser = (TypeParser)objparser; As you can see the second value is coming from a totally different assembly. Note that this is even though I EXPLICITLY SPECIFIED an assembly path to load the assembly from! Instead .NET decided to load the assembly from the original ApplicationBase folder. Ouch! How I actually tracked this down was a little more tedious: I added a method like this to both the factory and the instance types and then compared notes:public string GetVersionInfo() { return ".NET Version: " + Environment.Version.ToString() + "\r\n" + "wwReflection Assembly: " + typeof(TypeParserFactory).Assembly.CodeBase.Replace("file:///", "").Replace("/", "\\") + "\r\n" + "Assembly Cur Dir: " + Directory.GetCurrentDirectory() + "\r\n" + "ApplicationBase: " + AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ApplicationBase + "\r\n" + "App Domain: " + AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName + "\r\n"; } For the factory I got: .NET Version: 4.0.30319.239wwReflection Assembly: c:\wwapps\wwhelp\bin\wwreflection20.dllAssembly Cur Dir: c:\wwapps\wwhelpApplicationBase: C:\Programs\vfp9\App Domain: wwReflection534cfa1f For the instance type I got: .NET Version: 4.0.30319.239wwReflection Assembly: C:\\Programs\\vfp9\wwreflection20.dllAssembly Cur Dir: c:\\wwapps\\wwhelpApplicationBase: C:\\Programs\\vfp9\App Domain: wwDotNetBridge_56006605 which clearly shows the problem. You can see that both are loading from different appDomains but the each is loading the assembly from a different location. Probably a better solution yet (for ANY kind of assembly loading problem) is to use the .NET Fusion Log Viewer to trace assembly loads.The Fusion viewer will show a load trace for each assembly loaded and where it's looking to find it. Here's what the viewer looks like: The last trace above that I found for the second wwReflection20 load (the one that is wonky) looks like this:*** Assembly Binder Log Entry (1/13/2012 @ 3:06:49 AM) *** The operation was successful. Bind result: hr = 0x0. The operation completed successfully. Assembly manager loaded from: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\V4.0.30319\clr.dll Running under executable c:\programs\vfp9\vfp9.exe --- A detailed error log follows. === Pre-bind state information === LOG: User = Ras\ricks LOG: DisplayName = wwReflection20, Version=4.61.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null (Fully-specified) LOG: Appbase = file:///C:/Programs/vfp9/ LOG: Initial PrivatePath = NULL LOG: Dynamic Base = NULL LOG: Cache Base = NULL LOG: AppName = vfp9.exe Calling assembly : (Unknown). === LOG: This bind starts in default load context. LOG: Using application configuration file: C:\Programs\vfp9\vfp9.exe.Config LOG: Using host configuration file: LOG: Using machine configuration file from C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\V4.0.30319\config\machine.config. LOG: Policy not being applied to reference at this time (private, custom, partial, or location-based assembly bind). LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/Programs/vfp9/wwReflection20.DLL. LOG: Assembly download was successful. Attempting setup of file: C:\Programs\vfp9\wwReflection20.dll LOG: Entering run-from-source setup phase. LOG: Assembly Name is: wwReflection20, Version=4.61.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null LOG: Binding succeeds. Returns assembly from C:\Programs\vfp9\wwReflection20.dll. LOG: Assembly is loaded in default load context. WRN: The same assembly was loaded into multiple contexts of an application domain: WRN: Context: Default | Domain ID: 2 | Assembly Name: wwReflection20, Version=4.61.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null WRN: Context: LoadFrom | Domain ID: 2 | Assembly Name: wwReflection20, Version=4.61.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null WRN: This might lead to runtime failures. WRN: It is recommended to inspect your application on whether this is intentional or not. WRN: See whitepaper http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=109270 for more information and common solutions to this issue. Notice that the fusion log clearly shows that the .NET loader makes no attempt to even load the assembly from the path I explicitly specified. Remember your Assembly Locations As mentioned earlier all failures I've seen like this ultimately resulted from different versions of the same type being available in the two AppDomains. At first sight that seems ridiculous - how could the types be different and why would you have multiple assemblies - but there are actually a number of scenarios where it's quite possible to have multiple copies of the same assembly floating around in multiple places. If you're hosting different environments (like hosting the Razor Engine, or ASP.NET Runtime for example) it's common to create a private BIN folder and it's important to make sure that there's no overlap of assemblies. In my case of Html Help Builder the problem started because I'm using COM interop to access the .NET assembly and the above code. COM Interop has very specific requirements on where assemblies can be found and because I was mucking around with the loader code today, I ended up moving assemblies around to a new location for explicit loading. The explicit load works in the main AppDomain, but failed in the remote domain as I showed. The solution here was simple enough: Delete the extraneous assembly which was left around by accident. Not a common problem, but one that when it bites is pretty nasty to figure out because it seems so unlikely that types wouldn't match. I know I've run into this a few times and writing this down hopefully will make me remember in the future rather than poking around again for an hour trying to debug the issue as I did today. Hopefully it'll save some of you some time as well in the future.© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2012Posted in .NET  COM   Tweet !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true; po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s); })();

    Read the article

  • Is there such a thing as a virtual COM port receipt printer?

    - by Blorgbeard
    I'm debugging some code that writes directly to a COM port in order to print receipts on a receipt printer. The printer model is something like an Epsom TM-88. Instead of printing reams of thermal paper while debugging this code, it would be nice if I could use some kind of virtual printer. Like PDFCreator or FinePrint, but with a virtual COM port instead of a virtual windows printer. Does anyone know of such a thing? Edit: The code sends control characters to get bold text and other formatting. I'd like to see this in the output if possible.

    Read the article

  • Time zone for Force.com API fiscal date literals?

    - by Nick
    I have a question about fiscal date literals in the Force.com API (http://www.salesforce.com/us/developer/docs/api/Content/sforce_api_calls_soql_select_dateformats.htm): For which time zone are date ranges calculated? For example, suppose we execute the query: SELECT Id FROM Opportunity WHERE CloseDate = THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER where, according to our company's fiscal settings, THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER runs from Jan 1 to Mar 31. Does the range for THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER use... the user's time zone? For example, if the user's time zone is GMT-8, THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER = Jan 1 00:00 GMT-8 to Mar 31 23:59 GMT-8 (or Jan 1 08:00 UTC to Mar 31 07:59 UTC) the company's default time zone (according to the company profile)? For example, if the company's default time zone is GMT-8, THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER = Jan 1 00:00 GMT-8 to Mar 31 23:59 GMT-8 (or Jan 1 08:00 UTC to Mar 31 07:59 UTC) UTC? THIS_FISCAL_QUARTER = Jan 1 00:00 UTC to Mar 31 23:59 UTC something else?

    Read the article

  • Is there a COM object that just implements IUnknown I can use?

    - by Matt
    For an asynchronous Windows API, I can provide an IUnknown state parameter to associate calls to the API with calls from the callback. It's my understanding that COM guarantees that two IUnknown pointers to the same object will be of the same value. Thus, if I only want to associate API calls with callbacks, IUnknown should be all I need, by comparing the values of the pointers. Is there a stock implementation of IUnknown I can use? Of course it would be trivial to implement myself, but for such a base component of COM, I'm wondering if Windows or ATL provides one I should use instead. Thanks, --Matt

    Read the article

  • Deploying 32 and 64 bit COM objects on 64 bit machine from one VS setup project MSI.

    - by hooligan
    I have a Shell Namespace Extension C++ COM DLL that must have both a 32 bit and 64 bit version installed on a 64 bit machine, because when 32 bit applications perform a file- open the dialog that is presented is a 32 bit shell. The problem is that both my 32 bit and 64 bit COM objects have the same progid and the VS setup project will throw an error when including two files with the same progid. How do I get around this issue if I want to maintain the same code for both 32 and 64 bit? Currently I just have two different MSI's (32 and 64) and they both must be ran on the 64 bit machine.

    Read the article

  • What are the essential COM components required for burning DVD in Windows XP using .NET?

    - by shruti
    I'm trying to burn DVD/CD through frontend C# code... i have used IMAPI2 for buring CD/DVD in windows XP..but it is giving me unhandled exception... as:- System.InvalidCastException: Unable to cast COM object of type 'IMAPI2.Interop.MsftFileSystemImageClass' to interface type 'IMAPI2.Interop.MsftFileSystemImage'. This operation failed because the QueryInterface call on the COM component for the interface with IID '{7CFF842C-7E97-4807-8304-910DD8F7C051}' failed due to the following error: No such interface supported (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80004002 (E_NOINTERFACE)) can anyone please help me out to solve this problem. I'm not able to solve this error. this project is working fine in Windows7 but unable to work with XP.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43  | Next Page >