Search Results

Search found 26133 results on 1046 pages for 'asp mvc'.

Page 363/1046 | < Previous Page | 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370  | Next Page >

  • Why can't I make an http request to the ASP.NET development server on localhost?

    - by Chris Farmer
    I have an ASP.NET project (VS2008 on Windows 7 with either webforms, MVC1, or MVC2 -- all the same result for me) which is just the File-New hello world web project. It's using the default ASP.NET development server, and when I start the server with F5, the browser never connects and I get a timeout. I tried to debug this by telnetting to the development server's port while it was running, and I got the same result: C:\Users\farmercs>telnet localhost 54752 Connecting To localhost...Could not open connection to the host, on port 54752: Connect failed I can see in the system tray that the server thinks it's running, and a netstat -s -n command shows that there is indeed an active TCP listener on that port. This worked in the not-too-distant past, and I could work on web projects using the development server. One thing that has changed since then was that I installed the Microsoft Loopback Adapter to accommodate a local development Oracle installation. I'm not sure this is the problem, but it seems a likely culprit. So, what could be blocking me from connecting? And if it's the loopback, then what is a good way for me to retain my ability to connect to my development Oracle server while still being able to use the ASP.NET development server?

    Read the article

  • C#: Formview doesn't change Mode

    - by Vinzcent
    Hey When I try to change my formview to Edit, he stays in de ReadOnlyMode. I can't figure out why. This is my code. <asp:FormView ID="fvDetailOrder" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" DataKeyNames="ID" OnModeChanging="fvDetailOrder_ModeChanging"> <EditItemTemplate> // I want to see this, when I click edit <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="UpdateButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Update" Text="Update" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="UpdateCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> Insert here <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="InsertButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Insert" Text="Insert" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="InsertCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> Read only <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="EditButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Edit" Text="Edit" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="DeleteButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Delete" Text="Delete" OnClientClick="return confirm('Are you certain you want to delete this product?');" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="NewButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="New" Text="New" /> </ItemTemplate> <PagerStyle ForeColor="#003366" /> </asp:FormView> Eventhandler protected void fvDetailOrder_ModeChanging(Object sender, FormViewModeEventArgs e) { fvDetailOrder.ChangeMode(e.NewMode); } Thanks, Vincent

    Read the article

  • ASP.net site looks completely different on IE, Firefox, and Chrome; why?

    - by DavidR
    I'm doing css for a website. I send the html and css to a guy, he puts it into ASP.net. The problem is that the transfer didn't end well for my code and it needs some fixing. The problem is that when I look at it in Chrome, or Firefox, or IE8, I get three completely different renderings. I spent a good amount of time trying to fix a drop-down menu that is supposed to appear while hovering over a link. The one he had in place from ASP.net worked in IE, kinda worked in Firefox, and was completely broken in Chrome (I haven't tested Safari or Opera.) Just getting it to look basically the same in firefox and chrome was a struggle. The html source is showing me two completely different pages as well. Does anyone have experience with this? I know nothing of ASP.net, and it seems like the guy is modifying my layout with a wsyiwyg (I found tables used in random places, which I did not put there.) Faced with this, what is my best option? Is this fixable, or am I in over my head?

    Read the article

  • When radio button selection changes do not cause refresh?

    - by JPJedi
    When the selection of the radio buttons change I would like to show/hide the panel in the next table cell. I have it hiding and showing fine but each time it causes the page to refresh to the top. Is their a way to stop that refresh? I would like to hide and show the panel dynamically. <table> <tr> <td> <asp:RadioButtonList runat="server" ID="rblPlayerStatus" AutoPostBack="true" > <asp:ListItem>Free Agent</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>I have teammate</asp:ListItem> </asp:RadioButtonList> </td> <td> <asp:Panel runat="server" ID="pnlTeamMate"> <asp:Label runat="server" ID="lblTeamMate" Text="Choose Teammate" /> </asp:Panel> </td> </tr> </table>

    Read the article

  • Displaying a Sorted, Paged, and Filtered Grid of Data in ASP.NET MVC

    Over the past couple of months I've authored five articles on displaying a grid of data in an ASP.NET MVC application. The first article in the series focused on simply displaying data. This was followed by articles showing how to sort, page, and filter a grid of data. We then examined how to both sort and page a single grid of data. This article looks at how to add the final piece to the puzzle: we'll see how to combine sorting, paging and filtering when displaying data in a single grid. Like with its predecessors, this article offers step-by-step instructions and includes a complete, working demo available for download at the end of the article. Read on to learn more! Read More >

    Read the article

  • Multi-threaded library calls in ASP.NET page request.

    - by ProfK
    I have an ASP.NET app, very basic, but right now too much code to post if we're lucky and I don't have to. We have a class called ReportGenerator. On a button click, method GenerateReports is called. It makes an async call to InternalGenerateReports using ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem and returns, ending the ASP.NET response. It doesn't provide any completion callback or anything. InternalGenerateReports creates and maintains five threads in the threadpool, one report per thread, also using QueueUserWorkItem, by 'creating' five threads, also with and waiting until calls on all of them complete, in a loop. Each thread uses an ASP.NET ReportViewer control to render a report to HTML. That is, for 200 reports, InternalGenerateReports should create 5 threads 40 times. As threads complete, report data is queued, and when all five have completed, report data is flushed to disk. My biggest problems are that after running for just one report, the aspnet process is 'hung', and also that at around 200 reports, the app just hangs. I just simplified this code to run in a single thread, and this works fine. Before we get into details like my code, is there anything obvious in the above scendario that might be wrong?

    Read the article

  • Count word occurrences in a text field with LINQ

    - by Yoann. B
    How can i get the occurrences count of a Word in a database text field With LINQ ? Keyword token sample : ASP.NET EDIT 4 : Database Records : Record 1 : [TextField] = "Blah blah blah ASP.NET bli bli bli ASP.NET blu ASP.NET yop yop ASP.NET" Record 2 : [TextField] = "Blah blah blah bli bli bli blu ASP.NET yop yop ASP.NET" Record 3 : [TextField] = "Blah ASP.NET blah ASP.NET blah ASP.NET bli ASP.NET bli bli ASP.NET blu ASP.NET yop yop ASP.NET" So Record 1 Contains 4 occurrence of "ASP.NET" keyword Record 2 Contains 2 occurrence of "ASP.NET" keyword Record 3 Contains 7 occurrence of "ASP.NET" keyword Collection Extraction IList < RecordModel (ordered by word count descending) Record 3 Record 1 Record 2 LinqToSQL should be the best, but LinqToObject too :) NB : No issue about the "." of ASP.NET keyword (this is not the goal if this question)

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Menu, NavBar And Pager Performance Improvements v2010 vol 1

    Check out the improvements weve made to some of our ASP.NET controls in the DXperience v2010.1 release. We changed the rendering of our ASP.NET AJAX Menu, Navigation Pane and Pager controls. The controls now use semantic rendering combined with advanced CSS styles, which results in a dramatic decrease of HTML output, improved performance and a reduction in the servers workload. Also, several of our other ASP.NET controls like the ASPxGridView and ASPxScheduler also benefit because The primary...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • 2013 Microsoft ASP.NET/IIS MVP

    - by Vincent Maverick Durano
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/dotNETvinz/archive/2013/07/01/2013-microsoft-asp.netiis-mvp.aspxI am very honored to have received this award again. This is my fifth year in a row now and it feels really great! ;) That past year was a really blast and had a great time with the MVP Global Summit, was able to create and published new versions of my open-source controls at Codeplex, technical forum contributions, blogging,writing articles and speaking. I’m glad and  very happy that I made it again this year despite of all the busy stuffs at work and life, I still manage to contribute to the ASP.NET community. BIG thanks to God, Microsoft, my MVP lead Lilian Quek, Clarisse Ng our SEA MVP Program Specialist, my family, my great Boss, readers and friends who have supported me. Technorati Tags: MVP,ASP.NET,Community

    Read the article

  • Progressively stream the output of an ASP.NET page - or render a page outside of an HTTP request

    - by Evgeny
    I have an ASP.NET 2.0 page with many repeating blocks, including a third-party server-side control (so it's not just plain HTML). Each is quite expensive to generate, in terms of both CPU and RAM. I'm currently using a standard Repeater control for this. There are two problems with this simple approach: The entire page must be rendered before any of it is returned to the client, so the user must wait a long time before they see any data. (I write progress messages using Response.Write, so there is feedback, but no actual results.) The ASP.NET worker process must hold everything in memory at the same time. There is no inherent needs for this: once one block is processed it won't be changed, so it could be returned to the client and the memory could be freed. I would like to somehow return these blocks to the client one at a time, as each is generated. I'm thinking of extracting the stuff inside the Repeater into a separate page and getting it repeatedly using AJAX, but there are some complications involved in that and I wonder if there is some simper approach. Ideally I'd like to keep it as one page (from the client's point of view), but return it incrementally. Another way would be to do something similar, but on the server: still create a separate page, but have the server access it and then Response.Write() the HTML it gets to the response stream for the real client request. Is there a way to avoid an HTTP request here, though? Is there some ASP.NET method that would render a UserControl or a Page outside of an HTTP request and simply return the HTML to me as a string? I'm open to other ideas on how to do this as well.

    Read the article

  • How do you lock down & secure files stored on server in ASP.NET?

    - by Jon
    How do I go about securing files that are stored on the server? We have an ASP.NET app which generates PDFs. These are not stored in the wwwroot folder but in another folder i.e. C:\inetpub\data. This provides more security but maybe not enough. The ASP.NET/IIS process will need write access to this folder so it generate the PDFs there. Once the pdf is generated, it can be viewed using an ASP.NET form called viewpdf.aspx with the file to be viewed add to the query string like so viewpdf.aspx?FILE=mynewfile.pdf. This is loaded from a gridview. The full path to C:\inetpub\data is resolved and loaded in the Page_load event of the viewer page. Now I'm wondering how to secure this. Anybody could just view the file. Not by entering in the URL, as it won't been seen by IIS (its not in wwwroot), but could change the querystring in the viewpdf page. How do I stop anybody hacking this?

    Read the article

  • How can I limit asp.net control actions based on user role?

    - by Duke
    I have several pages or views in my application which are essentially the same for both authenticated users and anonymous users. I'd like to limit the insert/update/delete actions in formviews and gridviews to authenticated users only, and allow read access for both authed and anon users. I'm using the asp.net configuration system for handling authentication and roles. This system limits access based on path so I've been creating duplicate pages for authed and anon paths. The solution that comes to mind immediately is to check roles in the appropriate event handlers, limiting what possible actions are displayed (insert/update/delete buttons) and also limiting what actions are performed (for users that may know how to perform an action in the absence of a button.) However, this solution doesn't eliminate duplication - I'd be duplicating security code on a series of pages rather than duplicating pages and limiting access based on path; the latter would be significantly less complicated. I could always build some controls that offered role-based configuration, but I don't think I have time for that kind of commitment right now. Is there a relatively easy way to do this (do such controls exist?) or should I just stick to path-based access and duplicate pages? Does it even make sense to use two methods of authorization? There are still some pages which are strictly for either role so I'll be making use of path-based authorization anyway. Finally, would using something other than path-based authorization be contrary to typical asp.net design practices, at least in the context of using the asp.net configuration system?

    Read the article

  • Passing in extra parameters in a URL

    - by Scott Atkinson
    I have the below column on my table what gets binded on pageload, the parameters in there work fine but i need to add an additional parameter which is the fullname which is the next column along but im having trouble figuring our the syntax, here is my ASP <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="ID"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:HyperLink ID="hyperLeadID" runat="server" NavigateUrl='<%#Eval("ID","/documents/Q-Sheet.aspx?LeadID={0}&isHappyCallReferral=yes&isHappyName={1}") %>' Text='<%#Eval("ID")%>'></asp:HyperLink> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Referral Name"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="lblRefName" CssClass="gvItem" runat="server" Text='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container, "DataItem.Name") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> As you can see at the end of ID column i have added isHappyName={1} which i assumed it would select the next column along as it starts at 0 but it keeps throwing an error which is "Index (zero based) must be greater than or equal to zero and less than the size of the argument list." Can someone help me to pass the usersname through the URL Thanks

    Read the article

  • Formview doesn't change Mode

    - by Vinzcent
    When I try to change my formview to Edit, he stays in de ReadOnlyMode. I can't figure out why. This is my code. <asp:FormView ID="fvDetailOrder" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" DataKeyNames="ID" OnModeChanging="fvDetailOrder_ModeChanging"> <EditItemTemplate> // I want to see this, when I click edit <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="UpdateButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Update" Text="Update" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="UpdateCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> Insert here <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="InsertButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Insert" Text="Insert" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="InsertCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> Read only <asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="EditButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Edit" Text="Edit" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="DeleteButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Delete" Text="Delete" OnClientClick="return confirm('Are you certain you want to delete this product?');" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ForeColor="#003366" ID="NewButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="New" Text="New" /> </ItemTemplate> <PagerStyle ForeColor="#003366" /> </asp:FormView> Eventhandler protected void fvDetailOrder_ModeChanging(Object sender, FormViewModeEventArgs e) { fvDetailOrder.ChangeMode(e.NewMode); }

    Read the article

  • VS2010 changes your ASP.NET Version on setup projects to 4 - regardless

    - by blomqvist
    When converting your projects to VS2010 you get the question to migrate them to .net4. But even if you do not do that VS set the ASP.NET version to 4 for setup projects. And then when you try to install your application on a machine that does not have .NET 4 installed you will get the error message: “Could not open key: Software\Microsoft\ASP.NET\4.0.30128.0. Verify that you have sufficient access to that key, or contact your support personnel” What you need to do is to change the ASP.NET version back to 2.0 if that is what you want to use. You do that in the properties of the setup project.

    Read the article

  • Navigation for ASP.NET Web Forms project published on codeplex

    Navigation for ASP.NET Web Forms manages movement and data passing between aspx Pages in a unit testable manner. There is no Client-side logic, so it works in all browsers, and no Server-side cache, so it works with the browser back button.Features include loosely coupled Pages, typed data passing, empty code-behinds, context-sensitive bread crumb trail, ASP.NET Data binding integration, automatic ASP.NET Ajax history navigation and many more.The source code, binaries and comprehensive documentation...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • What&rsquo;s new in ASP.NET MVC 2 Wrox Blox available for purchase

    My latest book, the Whats new in ASP.NET MVC 2 Wrox Blox, is now available for purchase from the Wrox store at the cost of US $6.99. For those who are not familiar with them, Wrox Blox are short and concise ebooks that cover very specific topics. Ranging from 30 to 70-80 pages, they are a very good option in case you need to solve a specific problem, or learn a specific technology, but you dont to buy a whole book only when you would read a chapter or two. And this ebook is exactly like that:...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • DropDown Box + Update Panel

    - by bExplosion
    Hey I'm having an issue updating a dropdown box inside of an update panel. Works perfectly if the page posts back, but I'd prefer seemless loading: Here my form code: <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" EnablePartialRendering="true" runat="server"> </asp:ScriptManager> <asp:UpdatePanel ID="ajaxClassifications" UpdateMode="Conditional" runat="server"> <ContentTemplate> <td style="font-size: small; color: #003853; width: 50%;"> <asp:DropDownList AutoPostBack="true" ID="ddlClassifications" runat="server" Width="99%" Style="font-size: medium" OnSelectedIndexChanged="ddlClassifications_SelectedIndexChanged"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> <td style="font-size: small; color: #003853; width: 50%;"> <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlSubClassifications" runat="server" Width="99%" Style="font-size: medium"> </asp:DropDownList> </td> </ContentTemplate> <Triggers> <asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="ddlClassifications" EventName="SelectedIndexChanged" /> </Triggers> </asp:UpdatePanel> Heres the code in my code behind: protected void ddlClassifications_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { ddlSubClassifications.Items.Clear(); getSubClassifications(int.Parse(ddlClassifications.SelectedValue)); } Is there something I am missing here? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Getting JQuery UI Sortable to work on asp.net ListView items?

    - by Xaisoft
    I have the following ListView in which I am using the JQuery UI sortable function to be able to sort the items in the ListView. The problem is that I can't put a sortable class on the table in the ItemTemplate because it does not work, if I put a class="sortable" on the outer div, it works, but it allows me to sort everything within the ListView, I just want to be able to move sort the tables. Here is the markup <div> //Works here, but hr's become sortable too. <asp:ListView ID="lvwDocuments" runat="server"> <LayoutTemplate> <h3> Documents</h3> <asp:PlaceHolder ID="itemPlaceHolder" runat="server"> </asp:PlaceHolder> </LayoutTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <table class="sortable"> //Does not work Here <tr> <td> <p class="title"> <a runat="server" href='<%#Eval("url") %>'> <%#Eval("title") %></a></p> <br /> <p> <%#Eval("description") %></p> </td> </tr> </table> </ItemTemplate> <ItemSeparatorTemplate> <hr /> </ItemSeparatorTemplate> </div> Also, How can I preserve the sort order even after the page is refreshed.

    Read the article

  • Which is better Span that runat server or default asp lable ?

    - by Space Cracker
    I have a simple asp.net web page that contain a table with about 5 TR and each row have 2 TD .. in the page load I get user data ( 5 property ) and view them in this page the following are first 2 rows : <table> <tr> <td> FullName </td> <td> <span id="fullNameSpan" runat="server"></span> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Username </td> <td> <span id="userNameSpan" runat="server"></span> </td> </tr> </table> I always used <asp:Label to set value by code but i always notice that label converted in runtime to span so i decided to user span by making him runat=server to be accessed by code, so Which is better to use asp:label or span with runat=server ??

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Menu, NavBar And Pager Performance Improvements v2010 vol 1

    Check out the improvements weve made to some of our ASP.NET controls in the DXperience v2010.1 release. We changed the rendering of our ASP.NET AJAX Menu, Navigation Pane and Pager controls. The controls now use semantic rendering combined with advanced CSS styles, which results in a dramatic decrease of HTML output, improved performance and a reduction in the servers workload. Also, several of our other ASP.NET controls like the ASPxGridView and ASPxScheduler also benefit because The primary...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Listbox - selected item to call the class method directly using reflection

    - by Karan
    I have a problem scenario like this:- 1) Listbox with values like Car, Scooter and Bike. A button to click. <div> <asp:ListBox ID="lst" runat="server"> <asp:ListItem Text="Bike" Value="Bike"></asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Text="Car" Value="Car"></asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Text="Scooter" Value="Scooter"></asp:ListItem> </asp:ListBox> <br /> <br /> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" onclick="Button1_Click" Text="Invoke" /> </div> 2) Now i have three different class like below:- class Car { static string getData() { return "I like cars"; } } class Bike { static string getData() { return "I like Bike"; } } class Scooter { static string getData() { return "I dont like scooter"; } } 3) Now on the button click event handler "Button1_Click", i want to call the getData() method based on the selected value from the listbox using the REFLECTION only. Please help me out.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Multilingual Web Application

    - by BobhatePradip
    We are going to see how we can show localized content to your ASP.NET MVC web application. We will see mainly two approaches- Approach 1: Using Static Pages We can go for this approach only when we have few/limited static localized pages. Approach 2: Using Dynamic page with localized data at runtime We should go for this approach if we have large number of pages to show a data in localized format. In this approach we can either use resource file or directly data from database.   For details about the this check this link http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Multilingual.aspx Here you can have code sample with explanation.

    Read the article

  • re: Production ASP.NET MVC Plug

    Just wanted to do a quick plug for my first production asp.net mvc app. It's not too complex at the moment, but its going to grow into something potentially large, so I am now working on a new version to handle multiple cities. I also wanted to get it up and running with little jquery/client side features and plug in these "nice to haves" as we progress. Let me know what you guys think! I've got a pretty solid handle on Facebook Connect, so...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • MVC 2 Client Side Model Validation with ExtJS

    One of the most exciting new features in MVC 2 is "Enhanced Model Validation support across both server and client"; this new enhanced support allows for client side validation to be dynamically generated into a view from DataAnnotations attributes on models. One minor complaint: Out of the box, it only supports the Microsoft AJAX libraries. Good news: It can use other frameworks, and we have done just that! Ext.ux.MvcFormValidator The MvcFormValidator is an alternative form validation...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370  | Next Page >