Search Results

Search found 29121 results on 1165 pages for 'sql 2000'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 363/1165 | < Previous Page | 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370  | Next Page >

  • Combining IN and NOT IN in SQL as single result

    - by UltraVi01
    I apologize for the vague title. I am attempting to write a query that returns an alias column with matching values (resulting from an IN) as well as an alias column with values that do not match (using NOT IN). I want the result set to have: userId | matches | nonmatches. I currently have the following query which returns the matches as expected. I am having trouble getting the nonmatches in the result set -- that is, from a NOT IN statement SET @userId = 9; SELECT ug.user_id, COUNT(DISTINCT goal_id) as matches FROM user_goal ug WHERE ug.user_id!=@userId AND goal_id IN (SELECT iug.goal_id FROM user_goal iug WHERE user_id=@userId) GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY matches DESC LIMIT 4 So, the NOT IN would look something like this: goal_id NOT IN(SELECT uggg.goal_id FROM user_goal uggg WHERE user_id=@userId) AS nonmatches I am just not sure how to incorporate the NOT IN statement in my query so I get all the results

    Read the article

  • Getting maximum value from table using LINQ

    - by Tena
    I have a table in my database. I want to get the maximum value of a column named NumOfView. I used this code: var advert=(from ad in storedb.Ads where ad.AdScope == "1" select ad.NumOfView).Max(); It works but when there are two or more same maximum values it doesn't work and this message appears: Sequence contains more than one element What should I do now? Your answers will be very helpfull. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to save a Stored Procedure ?

    - by Richard77
    Hello, I've been playing today with stored procedures. I'm stoned that I picked the basic of it up so easily. (I'll also try triggers very soon). Now, I'd like to know how to save my SPROC under the stored procedure folder (Programmability - Stored Procedure) so that I can access it by name (eventually from my C# application). So far, when I press the save icon, I'm proposed to save the whole query. That's not what I want. Thanks for helping

    Read the article

  • SQL Server > Query > Column Names

    - by pojomx
    Hi, I'm here again- I have something like this Select A.a, A.b, A.a+A.b as c, (A.a+A.b*2)+A.d as d from Table But i want to know, if it is possible, to make it work with something like this: Select A.a,A.b,A.a+A.b as c, (c*2)+A.d as d from Table Thank you

    Read the article

  • saving an image object in sql server database from action method

    - by user3532152
    [HttpPost] public void Test(HttpPostedFileBase file) { UsersContext db = new UsersContext(); byte[] image = new byte[file.ContentLength]; file.InputStream.Read(image, 0, image.Length); CrimeReport i = new CrimeReport { ImageId=1, ImageName="Anjli",ImageContent = image, Active=true }; db.CrimeReports.Add(i); db.SaveChanges(); } I am getting an exception on db.CrimeReports.Add(i);

    Read the article

  • SQL more elegant combination of boolean checks possible?

    - by Matze
    Call me pedantic but is there a more elegant way to combine all those checks? SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '10.48.20.10' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '0.%' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '127.%' ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC; To something like this: SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE IN ('10.48.20.10','0.%','127.%', .... ) ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC;

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2005 Transactions

    - by mcallec
    I have a long running stored proc (approx 30 mins) which is currently running within a transaction (isolation level snapshot). I've set the transaction to snapshot to avoid locking records preventing other processes from accessing the data. What I'm trying to do is write to and read from a status table, but although we're in a transaction I'd like to write to and read from the status table as if I'm not in a transaction. I need this so that other processes can read any updates to this table by my stored proc, and this stored proc can also read any inserts made by other processes. I realise that having my entire stored proc running within a transaction isn't recommended, but this has been done for other reasons and we need to stick with that approach. So my question is within a transaction, is it possible to execute a query or call a stored proc which effectively isn't enlisted in the transaction?

    Read the article

  • sql exception handling

    - by christine33990
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE p_createLocaltable IS table_already_exist EXCEPTION; PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT (table_already_exist, -00955); BEGIN create table local_table as select * from supplied_table where rownum < 1; EXCEPTION when table_already_exist then DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Table already exists , does not need to recreate it'); END; can anyone see any problem of the above code?

    Read the article

  • which one is a faster/better sql practice?

    - by artsince
    Suppose I have a 2 column table (id, flag) and id is sequential. I expect this table to contain a lot of records. I want to periodically select the first row not flagged and update it. Some of the records on the way may have already been flagged, so I want to skip them. Does it make more sense if I store the last id I flagged and use it in my select statement, like select * from mytable where id > my_last_id order by id asc limit 1 or simply get the first unflagged row, like: select * from mytable where flagged = 'F' order by id asc limit 1 Thank you!

    Read the article

  • SUM minutes SQL server

    - by sandu
    HI guys, My litle problem goes like this : I have this columns : PHONE_NR , TIME ( time field ), Meaning the calling telephone number and call duration. I need to group phone nr and sum the minutes. Filds looks like this : nr time 726028xxx 00:07:07 735560css 00:07:37 726028xxx 00:07:55

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370  | Next Page >