Search Results

Search found 42585 results on 1704 pages for 'java api'.

Page 370/1704 | < Previous Page | 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377  | Next Page >

• Generate Spring bean definition from a Java object

  - by joeslice

  Let's suggest that I have a bean defined in Spring: <bean id="neatBean" class="com..." abstract="true">...</bean> Then we have many clients, each of which have slightly different configuration for their 'neatBean'. The old way we would do it was to have a new file for each client (e.g., clientX_NeatFeature.xml) that contained a bunch of beans for this client (these are hand-edited and part of the code base): <bean id="clientXNeatBean" parent="neatBean"> <property id="whatever" value="something"/> </bean> Now, I want to have a UI where we can edit and redefine a client's neatBean on the fly. My question is: given a neatBean, and a UI that can 'override' properties of this bean, what would be a straightforward way to serialize this to an XML file as we do [manually] today? For example, if the user set property whatever to be "17" for client Y, I'd want to generate: <bean id="clientYNeatBean" parent="neatBean"> <property id="whatever" value="17"/> </bean> Note that moving this configuration to a different format (e.g., database, other-schema'd-xml) is an option, but not really an answer to the question at hand.

  Read the article

• Hash Tables - Java

  - by Antony

  Am about to do a homework, and i need to store quite a lot of information (Dictionary) in a data structure of my choice. I heard people in my classroom saying hash-tables are the way to go. How come?

  Read the article

• ArithmeticException Java?

  - by KP65

  Can anyone help me find where the execption is? I can't seem to find the problem.. public void fieldChanged(Field f, int context){ //if the submit button is clicked try{ stopTime = System.currentTimeMillis(); timeTaken = stopTime - startTime; timeInSecs = ((timeTaken/1000)); speed = 45/timeInSecs; Dialog.alert("Speed of Delivery: " + speed + "mph"); } catch(ArithmeticException e){ Dialog.alert("error " + speed); e.printStackTrace(); } } startTime variable is a global variable..

  Read the article

• Promoting letters in a string to the next letter in java

  - by CSD1988

  I'm having issues figuring out how to get my code to increment the string that is given by user input so that when a user chooses to replace a letter like z it would go to a, b to c ect. The catch is I have to do this without using boolean. I am supposed to get this by using arithmetics to get the promotion from z to a from the users input. Plus must be only lower case letters from a-z. Any help would be appreciated thanks.

  Read the article

• Validate a statment from string in JAVA

  - by Adnan

  I have a string; String allIn = "(50 > 100) AND (85< 100)"; Now I need to evaluate if the conditions inside are TRUE or FALSE, how can I do it? In real the string will be a value from a field in my DB, where I will substitute different values and they will form a string as shown above.

  Read the article

• Confusion in multi dimensional array in Java

  - by Alvin

  Hello, I'm not able to understand the following multi-dimensional code. Could someone please clarify me? int[][] myJaggedArr = new int [][] { new int[] {1,3,5,7,9}, new int[] {0,2,4,6}, new int[] {11,22} }; May I know how it is different from the following code? int[][] myArr = new int [][] { {1,3,5,7,9}, {0,2,4,6}, {11,22} };

  Read the article

• Java LinkedList iterator being exhausted prematurely

  - by Sujeet

  I am using LinkedList and retrieving an Iterator object by using list.iterator(). After that, I am checking it.hasNext(), real issue is while checking it.hasNext(), sometimes it returns false. I need help why this is happening, though I have elements in the list. Some code: public synchronized void check(Object obj) throws Exception { Iterator itr = list.iterator(); while(itr.hasNext()) { //This Line I get false.. though i have list size is 1 Item p = (Item)itr.next(); if(p.getId() == null) {continue;} if(p.getId().getElemntId() == obj.getId() || obj.getId() == 0 ) { p.setResponse(obj); notifyAll(); return; } } Log.Error("validate failed obj.getId="+obj.getId()+" **list.size="+list.size()*This shows 1*); throw new Exception("InvalidData"); }

  Read the article

• Problems reading text file data in Java

  - by user1828401

  I have this code: BufferedReader br =new BufferedReader(new FileReader("userdetails.txt")); String str; ArrayList<String> stringList = new ArrayList<String>(); while ((str=br.readLine())!=null){ String datavalue [] = str.split(","); String category = datavalue[0]; String value = datavalue[1]; stringList.add(category); stringList.add(value); } br.close(); it works when the variables category and value do not have a comma(,),however the values in the variable value does contain commas.Is there a way that I can split the index of the without using comma?

  Read the article

• Waiting for a subset of threads in a Java ThreadPool

  - by David Semeria

  Let's say I have a thread pool containing X items, and a given task employs Y of these items (where Y is much smaller than X). I want to wait for all of the threads of a given task (Y items) to finish, not the entire thread pool. If the thread pool's execute() method returned a reference to the employed thread I could simply join() to each of these Y threads, but it doesn't. Does anyone know of an elegant way to accomplish this? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Java Swing - Adding a row # column to a JTable

  - by llm

  I have data from a database loaded into a JTable through a custom table model. I want to have a column (should be the first column) which simply shows the display row number (i.e. it is not tied to any data (or sorting) but is simply the row number on the screen starting at 1). These "column headers" should be grayed out like the row headers. Any idea how to do this? Thanks

  Read the article

• Java - How to pass a Generic parameter as Class<T> to a constructor

  - by Joe Almore

  I have a problem here that still cannot solve, the thing is I have this abstract class: public abstract class AbstractBean<T> { private Class<T> entityClass; public AbstractBean(Class<T> entityClass) { this.entityClass = entityClass; }... Now I have another class that inherits this abstract: @Stateless @LocalBean public class BasicUserBean<T extends BasicUser> extends AbstractBean<T> { private Class<T> user; public BasicUserBean() { super(user); // Error: cannot reference user before supertype contructor has been called. } My question is how can I make this to work?, I am trying to make the class BasicUserBean inheritable, so if I have class PersonBean which inherits BasicUserBean then I could set in the Generic the entity Person which also inherits the entity BasicUser. And it will end up being: @Stateless @LocalBean public class PersonBean extends BasicUserBean<Person> { public PersonBean() { super(Person.class); } ... I just want to inherit the basic functionality from BasicUserBean to all descendants, so I do not have to repeat the same code among all descendants. Thanks!.

  Read the article

• Swapping switch-case in extra fle/data structure (Java)

  - by poeschlorn

  Hi guys, it may be a nooby question, but I've never needed it before: I have several strings and I want to compare them to given ones... At first glance it would lead to a switch/case construction in what every available entry is checked. Is there a more elegant way to swap those strings as key/value datas? greets, poeschlorn

  Read the article

• Generics Java and Shadowing of type parameters

  - by rubixibuc

  This code seems to work fine class Rule<T> { public <T>Rule(T t) { } public <T> void Foo(T t) { } } Does the method type parameter shadow the class type parameter? Also when you create an object does it use the type parameter of the class? example Rule<String> r = new Rule<String>(); Does this normally apply to the type parameter of the class, in the situation where they do not conflict? I mean when only the class has a type parameter, not the constructor, or does this look for a type parameter in the constructor? If they do conflict how does this change? SEE DISCUSSION BELOW if I have a function call x = <Type Parameter>method(); // this is a syntax error even inside the function or class ; I must place a this before it, why is this, and does everything still hold true. Why don't I need to prefix anything for the constructor call. Shouldn't Oracle fix this.

  Read the article

• java oracle cusor is closed where cursor is not return to jdbc

  - by optimus

  I am executing a stored procedure which has 2 cusors within the stored procedure. The 1st cursor which is not return to the jdbc as a resultset is closed within the stored procedure. The 2nd cursor which returns the resultset to the jdbc is not closed within the stored procedure. Upon executing I encounter cursor is closed exception which is puzzling. Since the ResultSet will close all underlying cursor upon invoking the close() method

  Read the article

• Organizing github repository for java 6 and 7

  - by Edmon

  I am wanting to create a gihub repository that offers benchmarking code that works for concurrent features available only in JDK 1.7 (Fork/Join) as well as for older ones found in JDK 1.6. Offering both options is important for what I need. Does anyone have a recommendation how should I structure the repository. I was planning on having a repo called and under it: jdk17 build src mycode ... jdk16 build src mycode Please suggest any alternatives, possibly use of Maven or other more practical approaches, if any.

  Read the article

• Strange behavior when overloading methods in Java

  - by Sep

  I came across this weird (in my opinion) behavior today. Take this simple Test class: public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { Test t = new Test(); t.run(); } private void run() { List<Object> list = new ArrayList<Object>(); list.add(new Object()); list.add(new Object()); method(list); } public void method(Object o) { System.out.println("Object"); } public void method(List<Object> o) { System.out.println("List of Objects"); } } It behaves the way you expect, printing "List of Objects". But if you change the following three lines: List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>(); list.add(""); list.add(""); you will get "Object" instead. I tried this a few other ways and got the same result. Is this a bug or is it a normal behavior? And if it is normal, can someone explain why? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Java : Count even values in a Binary Search Tree recursively

  - by user307682

  Hi, I need to find out how many even values are contained in a binary tree. this is my code. private int countEven(BSTNode root){ if ((root == null)|| (root.value%2==1)) return 0; return 1+ countEven(root.left) + countEven(root.right); } this i just coded as i do not have a way to test this out. I'm not able to test it out at the moment but need an answer so badly. any help is deeply appreciated.

  Read the article

• Basics of working with Arrays in Java

  - by Emanuil

  How do you: 1. Initialize (create) an Array. 2. Push a String value into it. 3. Push another String value into it. 4. Dump it to get its contents.

  Read the article

• hex to byte conversion in java

  - by helpjava

  i havae tried coding and i get ascii value of hex string pls help

  Read the article

• Container of Generic Types in java

  - by Cyker

  I have a generic class Foo<T> and parameterized types Foo<String> and Foo<Integer>. Now I want to put different parameterized types into a single ArrayList. What is the correct way of doing this? Candidate 1: public class MMM { public static void main(String[] args) { Foo<String> fooString = new Foo<String>(); Foo<Integer> fooInteger = new Foo<Integer>(); ArrayList<Foo<?> > list = new ArrayList<Foo<?> >(); list.add(fooString); list.add(fooInteger); for (Foo<?> foo : list) { // Do something on foo. } } } class Foo<T> {} Candidate 2: public class MMM { public static void main(String[] args) { Foo<String> fooString = new Foo<String>(); Foo<Integer> fooInteger = new Foo<Integer>(); ArrayList<Foo> list = new ArrayList<Foo>(); list.add(fooString); list.add(fooInteger); for (Foo foo : list) { // Do something on foo. } } } class Foo<T> {} In a word, it is related to the difference between Foo<?> and the raw type Foo. Update: Grep What is the difference between the unbounded wildcard parameterized type and the raw type? on this link may be helpful.

  Read the article

• Setting the type of a field in a superclass from a subclass (Java)

  - by Ibolit

  Hi. I am writing a project on Google App Engine, within it I have a number of abstract classes that I hope I will be able to use in my future projects, and a number of concrete classes inheriting from them. Among other abstract classes I have an abstract servlet that does user management, and I hava an abstract user. The AbstractUser has all the necessary fields and methods for storing it in the datastore and telling whether the user is registered with my service or not. It does not implement any project specific functionality. The abstract servlet that manages users, refers only to the methods declared in the AbstractUser class, which allows it to generate links for logging in, logging out and registering (for unregistered users). In order to implement the project-specific user functionality I need to subclass the Abstract user. The servlets I use in my project are all indirect descendants from that abstract user management servlet, and the user is a protected field in it, so the descendant servlets can use it as their own field. However, whenever i want to access any project specific method of the concrete user, i need to cast it to that type. i.e. (abstract user managing servlet) ... AbstractUser user = getUser(); ... abstract protected AbstractUser getUser(); (project-specific abstract servlet) @Override protected AbstractUser getUser() { return MyUserFactory.getUser(); } any other project specific servlet: int a = ((ConcreteUser) user).getA(); Well, what i'd like to do is to somehow make the type of “user” in the superclass depend on something in the project-specific abstract class. Is it at all possible? And i don't want to move all the user-management stuff into a project-specific layer, for i would like to have it for my future projects already written :) Thank you for your help.

  Read the article

• What is an iterator in Java?

  - by androidbase Praveen

  the iterator is a collection or a kind of control statement use. define plz.

  Read the article

• Java How to find a value in a linked list iteratively and recursively

  - by Roxy

  Hi I have a method that has a reference to a linked list and a int value. So, this method would count and return how often the value happens in the linked list. So, I decided to make a class, public class ListNode{ public ListNode (int v, ListNode n) {value = v; next = n;) public int value; public ListNode next; } Then, the method would start with a public static int findValue(ListNode x, int valueToCount){ // so would I do it like this?? I don't know how to find the value, // like do I check it? for (int i =0; i< x.length ;i++){ valueToCount += valueToCount; } So, I CHANGED this part, If I did this recursively, then I would have public static int findValue(ListNode x, int valueToCount) { if (x.next != null && x.value == valueToCount { return 1 + findValue(x, valueToCount);} else return new findvalue(x, valueToCount); SO, is the recursive part correct now?

  Read the article

• Replace <Unknown Source> in Java Rhino (JSR223) with actual file name

  - by Lord.Quackstar

  Hello everyone, In my code, all of the scripts are contained in .js files. Whenever one of the scripts contains an error, I get this: javax.script.ScriptException: sun.org.mozilla.javascript.internal.EcmaError: ReferenceError: "nonexistant" is not defined. (<Unknown source>#5) in <Unknown source> at line number 5 What bugs me is the <Unknown Source>. Multiple files are in one ScriptContext, and it can be hard to track down an error. It also looks horrible. Is there a way to replace <Unknown Source> with the actual file name? None of the methods I see support passing a File object, so I'm really confused here.

  Read the article

• What is the eclipse java declaration shortcut ?

  - by Felipe

  There´s any eclipse shortcut to stance a new object ? For example. I would like to type: Object zzz = and it would complete for me this way: Object zzz = new Object(); with void parameter of course. I will wait answers.. thank you people.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377  | Next Page >