Search Results

Search found 57012 results on 2281 pages for 'com interop'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 372/2281 | < Previous Page | 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379  | Next Page >

  • L'ITC va examiner les mobiles d'HTC, pour répondre à la plainte déposée par Apple

    Mise à jour du 01.04.2010 par Katleen L'ITC va examiner les mobiles d'HTC, pour répondre à la plainte déposée par Apple L'ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) va venir fourrer son nez dans l'affaire qui oppose Apple à HTC. La commission a en effet décidé de mener enquête en examinant les smartphones produits par le taiwannais. C'est l'entreprise de Steve Jobs qui a fait appel à l'ITC en portant plainte pour usage non-autorisé de ses brevets. Hier, un juge administratif de l'ITC a déclaré prendre possession du cas. Il a désormais 45 jours pour fixer une date de complément d'enquête. Apple demande purement et simplement que les mobiles d'HTC soie...

    Read the article

  • Bruxelles finance un client BitTorrent décentralisé dans le cadre d'une recherche sur l'amélioration des réseaux informatiques

    La Communauté Européenne finance un client BitTorrent entièrement décentralisé Dans le cadre d'une recherche sur l'amélioration des réseaux informatiques Il est déjà difficile d'expliquer au grand public la différence entre hacker et pirate. On souhaite donc beaucoup de patience et de courage au Professeur responsable du projet Tribler pour expliquer la différence entre BitTorrent et piratage. Il s'agit pourtant d'un projet intéressant à plus d'un titre. Technologiquement, Tribler est un client BitTorrent entièrement décentralisé. Autrement dit, un logiciel qui permet d'échanger des contenus de machine à machine, en gré à gré (ou ...

    Read the article

  • eMachines EZ1601 Review

    With a slim and stylish all-in-one design and an 18.5-inch widescreen monitor, Acer's brand-new desktop looks like it should cost more than $400. We put the elegant little nettop to the test and wind up just one DIMM short of falling in love.

    Read the article

  • Embarcadero lance DBArtisan XE, un nouvel outil multiplateforme pour administrer des bases de donnée

    Embarcadero lance DBArtisan XE Un outil multiplateforme pour administrer des bases de données hétérogènes DBArtisan XE est un outil d'administration de bases de données hétérogènes, avec déploiement et mode de licence centralisés (et à la demande). Il est le dernièr produit en date de la famille d'outils DBArtisan édités par Embarcadero Technologies. Avec un support natif pour plusieurs plateformes de bases de données, DBArtisan XE permet par exemple aux administrateurs de bases de données de maximiser ? depuis une interface unique ? les performances, la disponibilité ou la sécurité de leurs bases quel que soit leur type. L'éditeur met en avant des "diagnostiques i...

    Read the article

  • Découverte d'un botnet "pratiquement indestructible", TDL-4 contrôle 4.5 millions d'ordinateurs et agit en tant qu'anti-virus

    Sécurité : découverte d'un nouveau botnet "pratiquement indestructible" TDL-4 contrôle 4.5 millions d'ordinateurs dans le monde Plus de 4.5 millions d'ordinateurs forment un nouveau botnet découvert par Kaspersky Labs qui le qualifie de « pratiquement indestructible ». D'après un rapport publié par l'éditeur russe de solutions de sécurité, le botnet « TDL-4 » ainsi découvert revêt une architecture particulièrement sophistiquée qui le hisse au rang de la plus dangereuse menace de l'histoire de la sécurité informatique. « TDSS utilise un ensemble de méthodes pour échapper aux signatures [numériques], aux [méthodes de détections] heuristiques...

    Read the article

  • ETPM/OUAF 2.3.1 Framework Overview - Session 2

    - by Rick Finley
    A number of sessions are planned to review the ETPM (OUAF) 2.3.1 Framework.  These sessions will include an overview of the Navigation, Portals, Zones, Business Objects, Business Services, Algorithms, Scripts, etc.. Session 2 includes a more in depth discusion of Business Objects (BO).  Session 2 specifically covers BO Schema, BO Options, and BO inheritance in more depth.  Click on the link below for Session 2 (52 minutes). To stream the recording:   https://oracletalk.webex.com/oracletalk/ldr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=70624122&rKey=8a16e59ed3736f1c To download the recording: https://oracletalk.webex.com/oracletalk/lsr.php?AT=dw&SP=MC&rID=70624122&rKey=140a83f63b8fa22a For additional questions, please contact manpreert.hundal@oracle.com.

    Read the article

  • Les services de cloud et d'hébergement IBM sont désormais certifiés SAP, pour plus de stabilité et de sécurité

    Les services de cloud et d'hébergement IBM sont désormais certifiés SAP, pour plus de stabilité et de sécurité "Les clients cherchant à déployer des applications SAP dans le cloud peuvent s'appuyer sur IBM pour les aider à manager et maintenir les exigences de leurs solutions dans un environnement cloud sûr et sécurisé ; qui permet des services flexibles et des coûts de fonctionnement réduits", a fièrement déclaré Jim Comfort, vice-Président de la division Offering Magagement d'IBM. En effet, après de longs tests très poussés, les infrastructures, processus et équipes techniques du géant de l'informatique ont été gratifiés de la certification SAP tant désirée. Ce sont les installations de cloud computing et...

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Impersonation

    SQL Server impersonation, or context switching, is a means to allow the executing user to assume the permissions of a given user or login until the context is set back, set to yet another user, or the session is ended. Deanna Dicken shows you two mechanisms for accomplishing this task and walks through some examples.

    Read the article

  • The Red Gate and .NET Reflector Debacle

    - by Rick Strahl
    About a month ago Red Gate – the company who owns the NET Reflector tool most .NET devs use at one point or another – decided to change their business model for Reflector and take the product from free to a fully paid for license model. As a bit of history: .NET Reflector was originally created by Lutz Roeder as a free community tool to inspect .NET assemblies. Using Reflector you can examine the types in an assembly, drill into type signatures and quickly disassemble code to see how a particular method works.  In case you’ve been living under a rock and you’ve never looked at Reflector, here’s what it looks like drilled into an assembly from disk with some disassembled source code showing: Note that you get tons of information about each element in the tree, and almost all related types and members are clickable both in the list and source view so it’s extremely easy to navigate and follow the code flow even in this static assembly only view. For many year’s Lutz kept the the tool up to date and added more features gradually improving an already amazing tool and making it better. Then about two and a half years ago Red Gate bought the tool from Lutz. A lot of ruckus and noise ensued in the community back then about what would happen with the tool and… for the most part very little did. Other than the incessant update notices with prominent Red Gate promo on them life with Reflector went on. The product didn’t die and and it didn’t go commercial or to a charge model. When .NET 4.0 came out it still continued to work mostly because the .NET feature set doesn’t drastically change how types behave.  Then a month back Red Gate started making noise about a new Version Version 7 which would be commercial. No more free version - and a shit storm broke out in the community. Now normally I’m not one to be critical of companies trying to make money from a product, much less for a product that’s as incredibly useful as Reflector. There isn’t day in .NET development that goes by for me where I don’t fire up Reflector. Whether it’s for examining the innards of the .NET Framework, checking out third party code, or verifying some of my own code and resources. Even more so recently I’ve been doing a lot of Interop work with a non-.NET application that needs to access .NET components and Reflector has been immensely valuable to me (and my clients) if figuring out exact type signatures required to calling .NET components in assemblies. In short Reflector is an invaluable tool to me. Ok, so what’s the problem? Why all the fuss? Certainly the $39 Red Gate is trying to charge isn’t going to kill any developer. If there’s any tool in .NET that’s worth $39 it’s Reflector, right? Right, but that’s not the problem here. The problem is how Red Gate went about moving the product to commercial which borders on the downright bizarre. It’s almost as if somebody in management wrote a slogan: “How can we piss off the .NET community in the most painful way we can?” And that it seems Red Gate has a utterly succeeded. People are rabid, and for once I think that this outrage isn’t exactly misplaced. Take a look at the message thread that Red Gate dedicated from a link off the download page. Not only is Version 7 going to be a paid commercial tool, but the older versions of Reflector won’t be available any longer. Not only that but older versions that are already in use also will continually try to update themselves to the new paid version – which when installed will then expire unless registered properly. There have also been reports of Version 6 installs shutting themselves down and failing to work if the update is refused (I haven’t seen that myself so not sure if that’s true). In other words Red Gate is trying to make damn sure they’re getting your money if you attempt to use Reflector. There’s a lot of temptation there. Think about the millions of .NET developers out there and all of them possibly upgrading – that’s a nice chunk of change that Red Gate’s sitting on. Even with all the community backlash these guys are probably making some bank right now just because people need to get life to move on. Red Gate also put up a Feedback link on the download page – which not surprisingly is chock full with hate mail condemning the move. Oddly there’s not a single response to any of those messages by the Red Gate folks except when it concerns license questions for the full version. It puzzles me what that link serves for other yet than another complete example of failure to understand how to handle customer relations. There’s no doubt that that all of this has caused some serious outrage in the community. The sad part though is that this could have been handled so much less arrogantly and without pissing off the entire community and causing so much ill-will. People are pissed off and I have no doubt that this negative publicity will show up in the sales numbers for their other products. I certainly hope so. Stupidity ought to be painful! Why do Companies do boneheaded stuff like this? Red Gate’s original decision to buy Reflector was hotly debated but at that the time most of what would happen was mostly speculation. But I thought it was a smart move for any company that is in need of spreading its marketing message and corporate image as a vendor in the .NET space. Where else do you get to flash your corporate logo to hordes of .NET developers on a regular basis?  Exploiting that marketing with some goodwill of providing a free tool breeds positive feedback that hopefully has a good effect on the company’s visibility and the products it sells. Instead Red Gate seems to have taken exactly the opposite tack of corporate bullying to try to make a quick buck – and in the process ruined any community goodwill that might have come from providing a service community for free while still getting valuable marketing. What’s so puzzling about this boneheaded escapade is that the company doesn’t need to resort to underhanded tactics like what they are trying with Reflector 7. The tools the company makes are very good. I personally use SQL Compare, Sql Data Compare and ANTS Profiler on a regular basis and all of these tools are essential in my toolbox. They certainly work much better than the tools that are in the box with Visual Studio. Chances are that if Reflector 7 added useful features I would have been more than happy to shell out my $39 to upgrade when the time is right. It’s Expensive to give away stuff for Free At the same time, this episode shows some of the big problems that come with ‘free’ tools. A lot of organizations are realizing that giving stuff away for free is actually quite expensive and the pay back is often very intangible if any at all. Those that rely on donations or other voluntary compensation find that they amount contributed is absolutely miniscule as to not matter at all. Yet at the same time I bet most of those clamouring the loudest on that Red Gate Reflector feedback page that Reflector won’t be free anymore probably have NEVER made a donation to any open source project or free tool ever. The expectation of Free these days is just too great – which is a shame I think. There’s a lot to be said for paid software and having somebody to hold to responsible to because you gave them some money. There’s an incentive –> payback –> responsibility model that seems to be missing from free software (not all of it, but a lot of it). While there certainly are plenty of bad apples in paid software as well, money tends to be a good motivator for people to continue working and improving products. Reasons for giving away stuff are many but often it’s a naïve desire to share things when things are simple. At first it might be no problem to volunteer time and effort but as products mature the fun goes out of it, and as the reality of product maintenance kicks in developers want to get something back for the time and effort they’re putting in doing non-glamorous work. It’s then when products die or languish and this is painful for all to watch. For Red Gate however, I think there was always a pretty good payback from the Reflector acquisition in terms of marketing: Visibility and possible positioning of their products although they seemed to have mostly ignored that option. On the other hand they started this off pretty badly even 2 and a half years back when they aquired Reflector from Lutz with the same arrogant attitude that is evident in the latest episode. You really gotta wonder what folks are thinking in management – the sad part is from advance emails that were circulating, they were fully aware of the shit storm they were inciting with this and I suspect they are banking on the sheer numbers of .NET developers to still make them a tidy chunk of change from upgrades… Alternatives are coming For me personally the single license isn’t a problem, but I actually have a tool that I sell (an interop Web Service proxy generation tool) to customers and one of the things I recommend to use with has been Reflector to view assembly information and to find which Interop classes to instantiate from the non-.NET environment. It’s been nice to use Reflector for this with its small footprint and zero-configuration installation. But now with V7 becoming a paid tool that option is not going to be available anymore. Luckily it looks like the .NET community is jumping to it and trying to fill the void. Amidst the Red Gate outrage a new library called ILSpy has sprung up and providing at least some of the core functionality of Reflector with an open source library. It looks promising going forward and I suspect there will be a lot more support and interest to support this project now that Reflector has gone over to the ‘dark side’…© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2011

    Read the article

  • nginx PPA does not work?

    - by Peter Smit
    I want to use the newest version of nginx, so I wanted to add the nginx/stable ppa sudo add-apt-repository ppa:nginx/stable sudo apt-get update However, the upgrade command says that there are no upgrades available and nginx is still the old version. Did I do something wrong? I use Ubuntu server 10.04 Lucid add-apt-repository output: $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:nginx/stable Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 8B3981E7A6852F782CC4951600A6F0A3C300EE8C gpg: requesting key C300EE8C from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com gpg: key C300EE8C: "Launchpad Stable" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 apt-cache policy ouput: $ sudo apt-cache policy nginx nginx: Installed: 0.7.65-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.7.65-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.7.65-1ubuntu2 0 500 http://eu-west-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

    Read the article

  • Consider GlassFish ESB v2 for SOA Tooling

    Are you finding it hard to obtain funding to finish building out your Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) technology stack? You may have heard about the Open Source GlassFish Java 5 EE Application Server, but did you know that there is a GlassFish ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) Project that integrates the Open ESB Project? See what it can do for you.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379  | Next Page >