Search Results

Search found 14956 results on 599 pages for 'mysql dba'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 372/599 | < Previous Page | 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379  | Next Page >

  • Scalable way of doing self join with many to many table

    - by johnathan
    I have a table structure like the following: user id name profile_stat id name profile_stat_value id name user_profile user_id profile_stat_id profile_stat_value_id My question is: How do I evaluate a query where I want to find all users with profile_stat_id and profile_stat_value_id for many stats? I've tried doing an inner self join, but that quickly gets crazy when searching for many stats. I've also tried doing a count on the actual user_profile table, and that's much better, but still slow. Is there some magic I'm missing? I have about 10 million rows in the user_profile table and want the query to take no longer than a few seconds. Is that possible?

    Read the article

  • diffing two databases

    - by flybywire
    Is there a tool to find the difference between two databases. Both the schema and the actual data are pretty much the same, but not 100%. Do you know a tool that can help to succinctly describe the changes.

    Read the article

  • How to do an additional search on archive in rails if record not found, by extending model?

    - by Nick Gorbikoff
    Hello, I was wondering if somebody knows an elegant solution to the following: Suppose I have a table that holds orders, with a bunch of data. So I'm at 1M records, and searches begin to take time. So I want to speed it up by archiving some data that is more than 3 years old - saving it into a table called orders-archive, and then purging them from the orders table. So if we need to research something or customer wants to pull older information - they still can, but 99% of the lookups are done on the orders no older than a year and a half - so there is no reason to keep looking through older data all the time. These move & purge operations can be then croned to be done on a weekly basis. I already did some tests and I know that I will slash my search times by about 4 times. So far so good, right? However I was thinking about how to implement older archival lookups and the only reasonable thing I can think of is some sort of if-else If not found in orders, do a search in orders-archive. However - I have about 20 tables that I want to archive and god knows how many searches / finds are done through out the code, that I don't want to modify. So I was wondering if there is an elegant rails-way solution to this problem, by extending a model somehow? Has anyone dealt with similar case before? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • mysql_fetch_array() not displaying all results

    - by user1666995
    I have a database with a calendar table (each row represents one day) with 4 years of rows (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015). I use the column name calyear for the year. I use the following code to find values for distinct years then display it: $year = mysql_query("SELECT DISTINCT calyear FROM calendar"); while($yeararray = mysql_fetch_array($year)) { echo($yeararray['calyear']."<br />"); } The problem is it only displays the years 2013, 2014, 2015 even though when I use echo(mysql_num_rows($year); it displays the value 4 which I take to mean all 4 years are there. I'm not quite sure where I'm going wrong with this.

    Read the article

  • Deleting rows from different tables

    - by Ross
    Here is what i'm trying to do: Delete the project from projects table and all the images associated with that project in the images table Lets say $del_id = 10 DELETE FROM projects, images WHERE projects.p_id = '$del_id' AND images.p_id = '$del_id' What is wrong with this query

    Read the article

  • Mysqli prepared insert statements always returning false

    - by user1754679
    I'm writing prepared statements that are supposed to insert data into a table, on a database that's been pre-selected in the variable $GLOBALS['mysqli']. The connection has been tested, and that's not the problem I'm having. I'm only running into trouble whenever my prepared statement involves INSERT INTO. I know the tablename, and field names are correct, but $stmt is ALWAYS false. What gives? $stmt = $GLOBALS['mysqli']->prepare("INSERT INTO audit_RefreshCount (user, count, lastrefresh) values (?,?,?)"); if ($stmt == TRUE) { $stmt->bindParam('ssi', $_SESSION['username'], '0', time()); //$stmt->bind_Param('ssi', $_SESSION['username'], '0', time()); // Also doesn't work. $stmt->execute(); }

    Read the article

  • database design - empty fields

    - by imanc
    Hey, I am currently debating an issue with a guy on my dev team. He believes that empty fields are bad news. For instance, if we have a customer details table that stores data for customers from different countries, and each country has a slightly different address configuration - plus 1-2 extra fields, e.g. French customer details may also store details for entry code, and floor/level plus title fields (madamme, etc.). South Africa would have a security number. And so on. Given that we're talking about minor variances my idea is to put all of the fields into the table and use what is needed on each form. My colleague believes we should have a separate table with extra data. E.g. customer_info_fr. But this seams to totally defeat the purpose of a combined table in the first place. His argument is that empty fields / columns is bad - but I'm struggling to find justification in terms of database design principles for or against this argument and preferred solutions. Another option is a separate mini EAV table that stores extra data with parent_id, key, val fields. Or to serialise extra data into an extra_data column in the main customer_data table. I think I am confused because what I'm discussing is not covered by 3NF which is what I would typically use as a reference for how to structure data. So my question specifically: - if you have slight variances in data for each record (1-2 different fields for instance) what is the best way to proceed?

    Read the article

  • Stop invalid data in a attribute with foreign key constraint using triggers?

    - by Eternal Learner
    How to specify a trigger which checks if the data inserted into a tables foreign key attribute, actually exists in the references table. If it exist no action should be performed , else the trigger should delete the inserted tuple. Eg: Consider have 2 tables R(A int Primary Key) and S(B int Primary Key , A int Foreign Key References R(A) ) . I have written a trigger like this : Create Trigger DelS BEFORE INSERT ON S FOR EACH ROW BEGIN Delete FROM S where New.A <> ( Select * from R;) ); End; I am sure I am making a mistake while specifying the inner sub query within the Begin and end Blocks of the trigger. My question is how do I make such a trigger ?

    Read the article

  • Want to calculate the sum of the count rendered by group by option..

    - by Vijay
    i have a table with the columns such id, tid, companyid, ttype etc.. the id may be same for many companyid but unique within the companyid and tid is always unique and i want to calculate the total no of transactions entered in the table, a single transaction may be inserted in more than one row, for example, id tid companyid ttype 1 1 1 xxx 1 2 1 may be null 2 3 1 yyy 2 4 1 may be null 2 5 1 may be null the above entries should be counted as only 2 transactions .. it may be repeated for many companyids.. so how do i calculate the total no of transactions entered in the table i tried select sum(count(*)) from transaction group by id,companyId; but doesn't work select count(*) from transaction group by id; wont work because the id may be repeated for different companyids.

    Read the article

  • Activetopics - Get max 5 topics per category

    - by Arjen
    Hey, I want to get the 5 latest active topics within several category's. Each topic has a subcatid and this subcatid relates to a catid. What I want is to get the 5 active topics within each catid. I'm trying to use the query below, but this isn't working at all: set @num := 0, @catid := 0; SELECT forum_posts.topicid, forum_topics.titel, forum_topics.sticky, forum_topics.gesloten, MAX(forum_cats.id) AS catid, MAX(forum_cats.titel) AS cattitel, MAX(forum_subcats.id) AS subcatid, MAX(forum_posts.id) AS maxid, DATE_FORMAT(MAX(forum_posts.datum), '%d-%m-%Y om %H:%i uur') AS datum, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(MAX(forum_posts.datum)) AS laatstereactieunix, (COUNT(forum_posts.id) - 1) AS reactieaantal, @num := IF(@catid = MAX(forum_cats.id), @num + 1, 1) AS row_number, @catid := MAX(forum_cats.id) AS dummy FROM forum_posts INNER JOIN forum_topics ON forum_topics.id = forum_posts.topicid INNER JOIN forum_subcats ON forum_subcats.id = forum_topics.subcat INNER JOIN forum_cats ON forum_cats.id = forum_subcats.cat WHERE forum_cats.id IN (1) AND forum_topics.gesloten != '1' GROUP BY forum_posts.topicid, forum_topics.titel, forum_topics.sticky, forum_topics.gesloten HAVING row_number <= 5 ORDER BY forum_cats.id ASC, MAX(forum_posts.datum) DESC When executing this code I get always the same number (1) for row_number, so this is not the result I want. Does anyone know how I can get this work? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • need code for show result inside table html

    - by klox
    dear all..i have a textfield <tr> <td> <td><input type="text" id="model_name"></td> </td> </tr> and a cell <tr> <td><div id="value">//i want data show here after fill textfield</div> </td> </tr> beside that, i've a table "settingdata" in database it consist of 2 field:itemdata and remark.. itemdata's value are "UD" and remark's value are "FM=87.5-108.0MHZ"... what must i do if i want after type model name "car01UD" at textfield inside <div id="value"></div> can show "FM=87.5-108.0mhz"...

    Read the article

  • php database image show problem

    - by Termedi
    here is the code <?php session_start(); if(!isset($_SESSION['user_name'])) { header('Location: login.php'); } $conn = mysql_connect("localhost", "root", "") or die("Can no connect to Database Server"); ?> <html> <head> </head> <body> <center> <div id="ser"> <form action="" method="post"> <label for="file">Card No:</label> <input type="text" name="card_no" id="card_no" class="fil" onKeyUp="CardNoLength()" onKeyDown="CardNoLength()" onKeyPress="CardNoLength()"/> <input type="submit" name="search" value="Search" class="btn" onClick="return CardNoLengthMIN()"/> </form> </div> </center> <br/><hr style="border: 1px solid #606060 ;" /> <center><a href="index.php">Home</a></center> <br/> <center> <?php if(isset($_POST['card_no'])) { if($conn) { if(mysql_select_db("img_mgmt", $conn)) { $sql = "select * from temp_images where card_no='".trim($_POST['card_no'])."'"; $result = mysql_query($sql); $image = mysql_fetch_array($result); if(isset($image['card_no'])) { //echo "<img src=\"".$image['file_path']."\" alt=\"".$image['card_no']."\" width=\"250\" height=\"280\"/>"; header("Content-type: image/jpeg"); echo $image['img_content']; } else { echo "<p style=\"color:red;\">Sorry, Your search came with no results ! <br/> Try with different card number"; } } else { echo "Database selection error: ".mysql_error(); } } else { echo "Could not connect: ".mysql_error(); } } ?> </center> </body> </html> But it after executing the script it shows: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at C:\xampp\htdocs\img\search.php:61) in C:\xampp\htdocs\img\search.php on line 77

    Read the article

  • sql UPDATE, a calculation is used multiple times, can it just be calculated once?

    - by Zachery Delafosse
    UPDATE `play` SET `counter1` = `counter1` + LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ), `counter2` = `counter2` - LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ), `x` = MOD(`x`, `y`) WHERE `x` `y` AND `maxchange` 0 As you can see, " LEAST(`maxchange`, FLOOR(`x` / `y`) ) " is used multiple times, but it should always have the same value. Is there a way to optimize this, to only calculate once? I'm coding this in PHP, for the record.

    Read the article

  • COUNT issue across multiple tables

    - by Kim
    I am trying to count across 2 tables and I dont see whats wrong with my query yet I get a wrong result. User 2 does not exist in table_two, so the zero is correct. SELECT t1.creator_user_id, COUNT(t1.creator_user_id), COUNT(t2.user_id) FROM table_one AS t1 LEFT JOIN table_two AS t2 ON t2.user_id = t1.creator_user_id GROUP BY t1.creator_user_id, t2.user_id Actual result 1 192 192 2 9 0 Expected result 1 16 12 2 9 0 The result indicate a missing group by condition, but I already got both fields used. Where am I wrong ? Also, can I sum up all users that doesnt exist in table_two for t1 ? Like user 3 exists 21 times in t1, then the results would be: 1 16 12 (users with > 0 in t2 will need their own row) 2 30 0 (user 2=9 + user 3=21 => 30) Its okay for the user Id to be wrong for sum of t1 for all users with 0 in t2. If not possible, then I'll just do two queries.

    Read the article

  • how to write this query using joins?

    - by aquero
    Hi, i have a table campaign which has details of campaign mails sent. campaign_table: campaign_id campaign_name flag 1 test1 1 2 test2 1 3 test3 0 another table campaign activity which has details of campaign activities. campaign_activity: campaign_id is_clicked is_opened 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 I want to get all campaigns with flag value 3 and the number of is_clicked columns with value 1 and number of columns with is_opened value 1 in a single query. ie. campaign_id campaign_name numberofclicks numberofopens 1 test1 1 1 2 test2 1 1 I did this using sub-query with the query: select c.campaign_id,c.campaign_name, (SELECT count(campaign_id) from campaign_activity WHERE campaign_id=c.id AND is_clicked=1) as numberofclicks, (SELECT count(campaign_id) from campaign_activity WHERE campaign_id=c.id AND is_clicked=1) as numberofopens FROM campaign c WHERE c.flag=1 But people say that using sub-queries are not a good coding convention and you have to use join instead of sub-queries. But i don't know how to get the same result using join. I consulted with some of my colleagues and they are saying that its not possible to use join in this situation. Is it possible to get the same result using joins? if yes, please tell me how.

    Read the article

  • Use concat and maintain length of variable

    - by user1682055
    I'm trying to use concat on some variables. These variables have been declared as chars: declare v_order_date char(10); declare v_quantity char(11); declare v_plant char(100); I have a cursor where I am setting these as some outputs. To call the results, I am setting v_msg as set v_msg := concat( v_msg, '\n', v_order_date, v_quantity, v_plant); However, the result I am getting when I select v_msg is: 2012-01-222501008 Creeping Buttercup but I want to maintain the length of the declared variables in my select that looks like this 2012-01-22 250 1008 Creeping Buttercup Are there any suggestions? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Select 2 Rows from Table when COUNT of another table

    - by Marcus
    Here is the code that I currently have: SELECT `A`.* FROM `A` LEFT JOIN `B` ON `A`.`A_id` = `B`.`value_1` WHERE `B`.`value_2` IS NULL AND `B`.`userid` IS NULL ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 2 What it currently is supposed to do is select 2 rows from A when the 2 rows A_id being selected are not in value_1 or value_2 in B. And the rows in B are specific to individual users with userid. What I need to do is make it also so that also checks if there are already N rows in B matching a A_id (either in value_1, or value_2) and userid, and if there are more than N rows, it doesn't select the A row.

    Read the article

  • How do large sites accomplish row-level permissions?

    - by JayD3e
    So I am making a small site using cakephp, and my ACL is set up so that every time a piece of content is created, an ACL rule is created to link the owner of the piece of content to the actual content. This allows each owner to edit/delete their own content. This method just seems so inefficient, because there is an equivalent amount of ACL rules as content in the database. I was curious, how do big sites, with millions of pieces of content, solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Best datastructure for this relationship...

    - by Travis
    I have a question about database 'style'. I need a method of storing user accounts. Some users "own" other user accounts (sub-accounts). However not all user accounts are owned, just some. Is it best to represent this using a table structure like so... TABLE accounts ( ID ownerID -> ID name ) ...even though there will be some NULL values in the ownerID column for accounts that do not have an owner. Or would it be stylistically preferable to have two tables, like so. TABLE accounts ( ID name ) TABLE ownedAccounts ( accountID -> accounts(ID) ownerID -> accounts(ID) ) Thanks for the advice.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379  | Next Page >