Search Results

Search found 38660 results on 1547 pages for 'sql index'.

Page 373/1547 | < Previous Page | 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380  | Next Page >

• delete rows using sql 'like' command using data from another table

  - by Captastic

  Hi All, I am trying to delete rows from a table ("lovalarm") where a field ("pointid") is like any one of a number of strings. Currently I am entering them all manually however I need to be able to have a list of over 100,000 options. My thoughts are to have a table ("lovdata") containing all possible strings and running a query to delete rows where the field is 'like' any of the strings in the other table. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to if/how I can use like in this way? Many thanks, Cap

  Read the article

• getting values by time difference in SQL

  - by Maestro1024

  I want to get the difference of two values within a time frame. so I have a table like this Data Table TimeStamp DataValue 2010-06-01 21 2010-06-03 33 2010-06-05 44 So I want to first get all data over the last month which I can do with something like. ([TimeStamp] < GETDATE()-0 and ([TimeStamp] > GETDATE()-31) But I want to see how much value added on over the course of the month. So it started at 21 and went to 44. So I would expect this example to to return 23 (as in 44-21). How would I build a query like this?

  Read the article

• Generic Database table design

  - by Gazeth

  Just trying to figure out the best way to design my table for the following scenario: I have several areas in my system (documents, projects, groups and clients) and each of these can have comments logged against them. My question is should I have one table like this: CommentID DocumentID ProjectID GroupID ClientID etc Where only one of the ids will have data and the rest will be NULL or should I have a seperate CommentType table and have my comments table like this: CommentID CommentTypeID ResourceID (this being the id of the project/doc/client) etc My thoughts are that option 2 would be more efficient from an indexing point of view?

  Read the article

• Java: How ArrayList memory management

  - by cka3o4nik

  In my Data Structures class we have studies the Java ArrayList class, and how it grows the underlying array when a user adds more elements. That is understood. However, I cannot figure out how exactly this class frees up memory when lots of elements are removed from the list. Looking at the source, there are three methods that remove elements: [code] public E remove(int index) { RangeCheck(index); modCount++; E oldValue = (E) elementData[index]; int numMoved = size - index - 1; if (numMoved 0) System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index, numMoved); elementData[--size] = null; // Let gc do its work return oldValue; } public boolean remove(Object o) { if (o == null) { for (int index = 0; index < size; index++) if (elementData[index] == null) { fastRemove(index); return true; } } else { for (int index = 0; index < size; index++) if (o.equals(elementData[index])) { fastRemove(index); return true; } } return false; } private void fastRemove(int index) { modCount++; int numMoved = size - index - 1; if (numMoved 0) System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index, numMoved); elementData[--size] = null; // Let gc do its work } {/code] None of them reduce the datastore array. I even started questioning if memory free up ever happens, but empirical tests show that it does. So there must be some other way it is done, but where and how? I checked the parent classes as well with no success.

  Read the article

• Beginner Access VBA SQL INSERT Question

  - by Josh K

  Syntax question: I am using the code below to call a query in Access VBA strSQL = "INSERT INTO tblLoanDetails ([ServerName]) VALUES ('Test') WHERE [ID]=3" Call CurrentDb.Execute(strSQL) And i am getting a runtime error of "3067: Query must contain atleast one table or query." the insert statement string looks like this (Threw the var into a text box): INSERT INTO tblLoanDetails ([ServerName]) VALUES ('Test') WHERE [ID]=3 I also tried adding a semi-colon to the end but with no luck. I also double checked to make sure my table is called tblLoanDetails and my Column names are ServerName, and ID Appreciate any help.

  Read the article

• SQL SELECT INSERTed data from Table

  - by Noam Smadja

  its in ASP Classic. MS-Access DB. i do: INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES (123)" what i want to retrieve is orderNumber from that row. its an auto-increment number. so i did: SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=123 but since it is on the same page, the SELECT returns: Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record. i've seen somewhere RETURNING orderNumber as variable but it was for oracle and i dont know how to implement it into my asp :( set addOrder = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Command") addOrder.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING addOrder.CommandText = "INSERT INTO Orders (userId) VALUES ("&userId&")" addOrder.CommandType = 1 addOrder.CommandTimeout = 0 addOrder.Prepared = true addOrder.Execute() Dim getOrderNumber Set getOrderNumber = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") getOrderNumber.ActiveConnection = MM_KerenDB_STRING getOrderNumber.Source = "SELECT orderNumber FROM Orders WHERE userId=" & userId getOrderNumber.CursorType = 0 getOrderNumber.CursorLocation = 2 getOrderNumber.LockType = 1 getOrderNumber.Open() session("orderNumber") = getOrderNumber.Fields.Item("orderNumber").value

  Read the article

• Selecting countries with largest populations in SQL

  - by Dharmendra

  table is bbc(name, region, area, population, gdp) Some countries have populations more than three times that of any of their neighbours (in the same region). Give the countries and regions. Please help.

  Read the article

• SQL: Limit rows linked to each joined row

  - by SolidSnakeGTI

  Hello, I've certain situation that requires certain result set from MySQL query, let's see the current query first & then ask my question: SELECT thread.dateline AS tdateline, post.dateline AS pdateline, MIN(post.dateline) FROM thread AS thread LEFT JOIN post AS post ON(thread.threadid = post.threadid) LEFT JOIN forum AS forum ON(thread.forumid = forum.forumid) WHERE post.postid != thread.firstpostid AND thread.open = 1 AND thread.visible = 1 AND thread.replycount >= 1 AND post.visible = 1 AND (forum.options & 1) AND (forum.options & 2) AND (forum.options & 4) AND forum.forumid IN(1,2,3) GROUP BY post.threadid ORDER BY tdateline DESC, pdateline ASC As you can see, mainly I need to select dateline of threads from 'thread' table, in addition to dateline of the second post of each thread, that's all under the conditions you see in the WHERE CLAUSE. Since each thread has many posts, and I need only one result per thread, I've used GROUP BY CLAUSE for that purpose. This query will return only one post's dateline with it's related unique thread. My questions are: How to limit returned threads per each forum!? Suppose I need only 5 threads -as a maximum- to be returned for each forum declared in the WHERE CLAUSE 'forum.forumid IN(1,2,3)', how can this be achieved. Is there any recommendations for optimizing this query (of course after solving the first point)? Notes: I prefer not to use sub-queries, but if it's the only solution available I'll accept it. Double queries not recommended. I'm sure there's a smart solution for this situation. I'm using MySQL 4.1+, but if you know the answer for another engine, just share. Appreciated advice in advance :)

  Read the article

• Check constraint on table lookup

  - by bzamfir

  Hi, I have a table, department , with several bit fields to indicate department types One is Warehouse (when true, indicate the department is warehouse) And I have another table, ManagersForWarehouses with following structure: ID autoinc WarehouseID int (foreign key reference DepartmentID from departments) ManagerID int (foreign key reference EmployeeID from employees) StartDate EndDate To set new manager for warehouse, I insert in this table with EndDate null, and I have a trigger that sets EndDate for previous record for that warehouse = StartDate for new manager, so a single manager appears for a warehouse at a certain time. I want to add two check constraints as follows, but not sure how to do this do not allow to insert into ManagersForWarehouses if WarehouseID is not marked as warehouse Do not allow to uncheck Warehouse if there are records in ManagersForWarehouses Thanks

  Read the article

• Insert Into Two SQL Tables From XML Maintaining Relationship

  - by Thx

  I am looking to insert records from xml into two different tables. For example <Root> <A> <AValue>1</AValue> <Children> <B> <BValue>2</BValue> </B> </Children> </A> </Root> Would insert a record into table A AID AValue # 1 also insert a record into table B BID AID BValue # #(Same as AID Above) 2 I have this DECLARE @idoc INT DECLARE @doc NVARCHAR(MAX) SET @doc = ' <Root> <A> <AValue>1</AValue> <Children> <B> <BValue>2</BValue> </B> </Children> </A> </Root> ' EXEC sp_xml_preparedocument @idoc OUTPUT, @doc CREATE TABLE #A ( AID INT IDENTITY(1, 1) , AValue INT ) INSERT INTO #A SELECT * FROM OPENXML (@idoc, '/Root/A',2) WITH (AValue INT ) CREATE TABLE #B ( BID INT IDENTITY(1, 1) , AID INT , BValue INT ) INSERT INTO #B SELECT * FROM OPENXML (@idoc, '/Root/A/Children/B',2) WITH ( AID INT, BValue INT ) SELECT * FROM #A SELECT * FROM #B DROP TABLE #A DROP TABLE #B Thanks!

  Read the article

• Why does this properly escaped SQL query fail?

  - by Jason Rhodes

  Here's the query: INSERT INTO jobemails (jobid, to, subject, message, headers, datesent) VALUES ('340', '[email protected]', 'We\'ve received your request for a photo shoot called \'another\'.', 'message', 'headers', '2010-04-22 15:55:06') The datatypes are all correct, it always fails at the subject, so it must be how I'm escaping the values, I assume. I'm sure one of you will see my idiot mistake right away. A little help?

  Read the article

• SQL - Conditionally evaluate WHERE clauses

  - by Crimius

  I need to get a WHERE clause to only evaluate certain statements. something like: WHERE field_a = field_b AND (CASE WHEN <PARAM>type</PARAM> = 5 THEN {field_c = 1 OR field_c = 2} WHEN <PARAM>type</PARAM> = 6 THEN {field_c = 3 OR field_c = 4} ELSE field_c = <PARAM>type</PARAM> so that when the Param type = 5, it only checks if field_c = 1 or 2. Any thoughts?

  Read the article

• Union and order by

  - by David Lively

  Consider a table like tbl_ranks -------------------------------- family_id | item_id | view_count -------------------------------- 1 10 101 1 11 112 1 13 109 2 21 101 2 22 112 2 23 109 3 30 101 3 31 112 3 33 109 4 40 101 4 51 112 4 63 109 5 80 101 5 81 112 5 88 109 I need to generate a result set with the top two(2) rows for a subset of family ids (say, 1,2,3 and 4) ordered by view count. I'd like to do something like select top 2 * from tbl_ranks where family_id = 1 order by view_count union all select top 2 * from tbl_ranks where family_id = 2 order by view_count union all select top 2 * from tbl_ranks where family_id = 3 order by view_count union all select top 2 * from tbl_ranks where family_id = 4 order by view_count but, of course, order by isn't valid in a union all context in this manner. Any suggestions? I know I could run a set of 4 queries, store the results into a temp table and select the contents of that temp as the final result, but I'd rather avoid using a temp table if possible. Note: in the real app, the number of records per family id is indeterminate, and the view_counts are also not fixed as they appear in the above example.

  Read the article

• Saving Double.MinValue in SQLServer

  - by PatrickL

  Using a TSQL update command against a SQLServer database, how can I update a column of type FLOAT with the smallest possible double value? The smallest possible double value in hex notation being 3ff0 0000 0000 0001 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double%5Fprecision)

  Read the article

• SQL is this equivalent to a LEFT JoIn?

  - by Jim

  Is this equivalent to a LEFT JOIN? SELECT DISTINCT a.name, b.name FROM tableA a, (SELECT DISTINCT name FROM tableB) as b It seems as though there is no link between the two tables. Is there an easier / more efficient way to write this?

  Read the article

• User activity vs. System activity on the Index Usage Statistics report

  - by Zachary G Jensen

  I recently decided to crawl over the indexes on one of our most heavily used databases to see which were suboptimal. I generated the built-in Index Usage Statistics report from SSMS, and it's showing me a great deal of information that I'm unsure how to understand. I found an article at Carpe Datum about the report, but it doesn't tell me much more than I could assume from the column titles. In particular, the report differentiates between User activity and system activity, and I'm unsure what qualifies as each type of activity. I assume that any query that uses a given index increases the '# of user X' columns. But what increases the system columns? building statistics? Is there anything that depends on the user or role(s) of a user that's running the query?

  Read the article

• What is wrong with this SQL syntax?

  - by Finbarr

  UPDATE files SET filepath = REPLACE(filepath, `sites/somedomain.com/files/`, `sites/someotherdomain.com/files/`); I have a table called files with a field called filepath. MySQL returns this error: Unknown column 'sites/somedomain.com/files/' in 'field list'

  Read the article

• Aggregate SQL column values by time period

  - by user305688

  I have some numerical data that comes in every 5 minutes (i.e. 288 values per day, and quite a few days worth of data). I need to write a query that can return the sums of all values for each day. So currently the table looks like this: 03/30/2010 00:01:00 -- 553 03/30/2010 00:06:00 -- 558 03/30/2010 00:11:00 -- 565 03/30/2010 00:16:00 -- 565 03/30/2010 00:21:00 -- 558 03/30/2010 00:26:00 -- 566 03/30/2010 00:31:00 -- 553 ... And this goes on for 'x' number of days, I'd like the query to return 'x' number of rows, each of which containing the sum of all the values on each day. Something like this: 03/30/2010 -- <sum> 03/31/2010 -- <sum> 04/01/2010 -- <sum> The query will go inside a Dundas webpart, so unfortunately I can't write custom user functions to assist it. All the logic needs to be in just the one big query. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. I'm trying to get it to work using GROUP BY and DATEPART at the moment, not sure if it's the right way to go about it.

  Read the article

• What is wrong with this simple update query?

  - by Kyle Noland

  I get no error message, but the row is not updated. The rows integer is set 1 following the query, indicating that 1 row was affected. String query = "UPDATE contacts SET contact_name = '" + ContactName.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_phone = '" + Phone.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_fax = '" + Fax.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_direct = '" + Direct.Text.Trim() + "', " + "company_id = '" + Company.SelectedValue + "', " + "contact_address1 = '" + Address1.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_address2 = '" + Address2.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_city = '" + City.Text.Trim() + "', " + "contact_state = '" + State.SelectedValue + "', " + "contact_zip = '" + Zip.Text.Trim() + "' " + "WHERE contact_id = '" + contact_id + "'"; String cs = Lib.GetConnectionString(null); SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(cs); SqlCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand(); cmd.CommandText = query; cmd.Connection.Open(); int rows = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();

  Read the article

• best practises to delete a set of tables in sql 2008

  - by Hari

  Basically i want to keep the transaction very simple but i should be able to rollback if any error in the later part. Something like mentioned below, BEGIN TRANSACTION DELETE SET 1(this will delete first set of table) COMMIT DELETE SET 2 (will delete second set of table) If any error occurs while deleting set 2 i should be able to rollback set 1 transaction as well.Let me know if we have any options to do like this. Appreciate for your help.

  Read the article

• SQL Reporting Services: Finding the folder a report is in

  - by Bob

  Hi there, If I have the report name how can I programmatically get the name of the project/folder the report is in? So for example if I have a report like so http://server/Reports/Pages/Report.aspx?ItemPath=/ReportProject1/ReportName Given "ReportName" how can I figure out that the report is in the folder "ReportProject1"? So I guess is there a function where I can pass int he report name and get it's details or else query the report server for a list of its report folders and I can loop through these and check some how that the report is inside?

  Read the article

• Run a proc on several different values of one parameter

  - by WEFX

  I have the following query that gets run within a proc. The function MyFunction returns a table, and this query joins on that table. This proc works great when a @MyArg value is supplied. However, I’m wondering if there’s a way to run this on all @MyArg values in the database. I’m sure there’s a way to do it within a loop, but I know that loops are generally to be avoided at the db layer. I really just need to perform this for the sake of checking (and possibly cleansing) some bad data. SELECT ColumnA, ColumnB, ColumnC FROM ( SELECT a.ColumnA, a.ColumnB, a.ColumnC, ROW_NUMBER() over(partition by a.ColumnD order by f.ColumnX) as RowNum FROM dbo.MyTableA AS a INNER JOIN dbo.MyFunction(@MyArg) f ON f.myID = a.myID WHERE (a.myBit = 1 OR a.myID = @MyArg) ) AS x WHERE x.rownum = 1;

  Read the article

• linq2sql left join with "multiselect"

  - by just_azho

  Hi, folks I'm trying to achieve following by linq2sql, but not successful. I've Member and Reference tables. DB is design in such a manner that Member can have multiple (=0) References. What I want as a result of query is, list (rows) of members, where all references of the member are "collected" in one column. What I had achieved is following query, but for this one there exist a row for each Reference. var refs = (from m in db.Members join r in db.References on m.PID equals r.PID into g from o in g.DefaultIfEmpty() select new { member = m, name = (o == null ? "" : o.NameSurname) }); I feel I need to insert SelectMany somewher :) Could you please give hints on achieving the goal?

  Read the article

• Something wrong on my very first LINQ to SQL c # code

  - by user334813

  using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; namespace Advanced_LinQ_Query { public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private DataClasses1DataContext database = new DataClasses1DataContext(); private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { database.Log= Console.Out; comboBox.SelectedIndex=0; } private void titleBindingNavigatorSaveItem_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Validate(); titleBindingSource.EndEdit(); database.SubmitChanges(); comboBox.SelectedIndex=0; } private void comboBox_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { switch (comboBox.SelectedIndex) { case 0: titleBindingSource.DataSource = from Title in database.Titles orderby Title.BookTitle select Title; break; case 1: titleBindingSource.DataSource = from Title in database.Titles where Title.Copyright == "2008" orderby Title.BookTitle select Title; break; case 2: titleBindingSource.DataSource = from Title in database.Titles where Title.BookTitle.EndsWith("How to Program") orderby Title.BookTitle select Title; break; } titleBindingSource.MoveFirst(); } } } no connection seems to built after debugging between Title table in my database (book.mdf) and titleBindingSource! Where is the problem?

  Read the article

• sql select from a large number of IDs

  - by Claudiu

  I have a table, Foo. I run a query on Foo to get the ids from a subset of Foo. I then want to run a more complicated set of queries, but only on those IDs. Is there an efficient way to do this? The best I can think of is creating a query such as: SELECT ... --complicated stuff WHERE ... --more stuff AND id IN (1, 2, 3, 9, 413, 4324, ..., 939393) That is, I construct a huge "IN" clause. Is this efficient? Is there a more efficient way of doing this, or is the only way to JOIN with the inital query that gets the IDs? If it helps, I'm using SQLObject to connect to a PostgreSQL database, and I have access to the cursor that executed the query to get all the IDs.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380  | Next Page >