Search Results

Search found 54338 results on 2174 pages for 'asp net webpages'.

Page 380/2174 | < Previous Page | 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387  | Next Page >

  • Updating .net 4.0 machine.config seems to have no effect

    - by Jon P
    I'm feeling stupid. I've just created my first ASP.net 4.0 site after working my way though over the years from 1.1 upwards. We have several settings at the machine.config level that I need to migrate to the new 4.0 machine.config. I though I had be adding the required connection strings to the connection string section of the following two files: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\machine.config C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\machine.config When I created a new website in IIS and assigned it to the ASP.net 4.0 Application pool I only get the default LocalSqlServer connection string. I tried editing the name of this in the two files above to indicate which file it was in, but there was no change. Are there machine.config files in other locations I should be looking at?

    Read the article

  • How do I call C++/CLI (.NET) DLLs from standard, unmanaged non-.NET applications?

    - by tronjohnson
    In the unmanaged world, I was able to write a __declspec(dllexport) or, alternatively, use a .DEF file to expose a function to be able to call a DLL. (Because of name mangling in C++ for the __stdcall, I put aliases into the .DEF file so certain applications could re-use certain exported DLL functions.) Now, I am interested in being able to expose a single entry-point function from a .NET assembly, in unmanaged-fashion, but have it enter into .NET-style functions within the DLL. Is this possible, in a simple and straight-forward fashion? What I have is a third-party program that I have extended through DLLs (plugins) that implement some complex mathematics. However, the third-party program has no means for me to visualize the calculations. I want to somehow take these pre-written math functions, compile them into a separate DLL (but using C++/CLI in .NET), but then add hooks to the functions so I can render what's going on under the hood in a .NET user control. I'm not sure how to blend the .NET stuff with the unmanaged stuff, or what to Google to accomplish this task. Specific suggestions with regard to the managed/unmanaged bridge, or alternative methods to accomplish the rendering in the manner I have described would be helpful. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Dynamically created textboxes and changes plus jQuery in ASP.NET?

    - by gazeebo
    Hi all, I was wondering how to read off a value from a textbox that resides in a partialview and output the value into a textbox within the initial window. Here's my code... <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function (e) { // Calculate the sum when the document has been loaded. var total = 0; $("#fieldValues :input.fieldKronor").each(function (e) { total += Number($(this).val()); }); // Set the value to the correspondent textbox $("#fieldSummation").text(total); // Re-calculate on change $("#fieldValues :input.fieldKronor").change(function (e) { var total = 0; $("#fieldValues :input.fieldKronor").each(function (e) { total += Number($(this).val()); }); $("#fieldSummation").text(total); }); }); </script> Here's the table where in info is... <table id="fieldValues" style="width: 60%; margin-bottom: 2em"> <thead> <tr> <th>Rubrik, t.ex. teknik*</th> <th>Kronor (ange endast siffror)*</th> </tr> </thead> <asp:Panel ID="pnlStaffRows" runat="server"></asp:Panel> <tfoot> <tr> <th></th> <th>Total kostnad</th> </tr> <tr> <td></td> <td><input type="text" value="" class="fieldSummation" style="width:120px" /></td> </tr> </tfoot> </table> And here's the partialview... <tr> <td class="greyboxchildsocialsecuritynumberheading4" style="padding-bottom:1em"> <asp:TextBox ID="txtRubrikBox" ToolTip="Rubrik" runat="server" Width="120"></asp:TextBox> </td> <td class="greyboxchildnameheading3" style="padding-bottom:1em"> <asp:TextBox ID="txtKronorBox" class="fieldKronor" ToolTip="Kronor" runat="server" Width="120"></asp:TextBox> </td> </tr>

    Read the article

  • Best way to get a date in .NET?

    - by frenchie
    I'm getting a string back from my page and I want to make sure it's a date. This is what I have so far (it works) and I just want to know if this is the "best" way to do it. I'm using .NET 4. int TheMonth =0; int TheDay = 0; int TheYear = 0; DateTime NewDate; var TheIncomingParam = Request.Params.Get("__EVENTARGUMENT").ToString(); char[] TheBreak = { '/' }; string[] TheOutput = TheIncomingParam.Split(TheBreak); try { TheMonth = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[0]); } catch { } try { TheDay = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[1]); } catch { } try { TheYear = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[2]); } catch { } if (TheMonth!=0 && TheDay!=0 && TheYear!=0) { try { NewDate = new DateTime(TheYear, TheMonth, TheDay); } catch { var NoDate = true; } }

    Read the article

  • What are supported clients for an asp.net webpage?

    - by Maestro1024
    What are supported clients for an asp.net web page? I am trying to document an asp.net website and I am unsure what I should say as far as client support. Are there limitations for asp.net as far as browsers? I have used IE and Firefox does it not work with some of the other browsers (chrome or safari)? Should I say the client is limited to any specific OS (I would expect it to work with a Mac or a Linux box)?

    Read the article

  • jQuery errorContainer practice

    - by Eyla
    I'm trying to be able to place the error message when using jQuery validation to a asp.net label if the text message is empty. please advice how to modify my code to get that!! here is my code: <asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="head" runat="server"> <script src="js/jquery-1.4.1.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="js/jquery.validate.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#aspnetForm").validate({ errorContainer: "#<%=TextBox1 %>", errorLabelContainer: "#<%=TextBox1 %> #<%=Label1 %>", wrapper: "li", debug: true, submitHandler: function() { alert("Submitted!") } }) }); </script> </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="ContentPlaceHolder1" runat="server"> </asp:Content> <asp:Content ID="Content3" ContentPlaceHolderID="ContentPlaceHolder2" runat="server"> <p style="height: 313px"> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" class="required"></asp:TextBox> <asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text="Label" ></asp:Label> </p> </asp:Content>

    Read the article

  • Which to learn first: Java/J2EE or .NET ?

    - by Eric Gustavson
    Is there an advantage to learning Java or .NET first? (ie. would the transition from J2EE to .NET be significantly easier than the reverse?) Do you think that one platform has overtaken the other in terms of industry use? (feel free to be as biased or as objective as you like) see also: Java or .NET?

    Read the article

  • ReSharper 5 external sources in a .NET 4.0 project

    - by RasmusKL
    I've read about the ReSharper external sources feature in ReSharper 5. But when attempting to use it on a .NET 4.0 project, but my attempts to make it work / use it have failed. Whenever I attempt to navigate to "Sources from Symbol Files" - I just get the message that the symbols are not available. Are the debug symbols for .NET 4 not released yet or are they placed somewhere else? It works fine and downloads the proper symbols for .NET 3.5 projects.

    Read the article

  • How to disable current page links in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by rem
    I'm investigating ASP.NET MVC now and noticed that in ASP.NET MVC application, which is created by Visual Studio by default, links "Home" and "About" are staying active when the user is on "Home" and "About" page correspondingly, and after clicking on the current page link page is reloading itself. What is the correct approach to disable link which points to the page, a user is already on? How to do it without violating ASP.NET MVC approach?

    Read the article

  • Consuming REST based web services in .Net

    - by steve
    Greetings, I'm confused as to the best approach to make when consuming REST based web services with .Net. At the moment I'm using the System.net.webclient class. Should I be using Webresponse, webrequest classes in System.Net ? If I were to use another approach (Other than webclient) what disadvantages / advantages would I gain ? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • What is the different between C# and .Net?

    - by Bopha
    Hello, May I know what is the different between C# and .Net? because when I think of C#, right away I would say is a .Net, but when I seearch for job, posts sometimes say require candidate to have C# and .Net experience. Can someone give me little of explaination? thanks..

    Read the article

  • .net vs other top technologies [closed]

    - by snorlaks
    Hello, I would like to ask You all, what do You think about the future of .Net technology comparing to other top fashion technologies (for example from google). Is it possible that within few years all solutions will be developed in other technologies than .Net. Is it worth learning .Net solutions looking into the future ?

    Read the article

  • Web.Config is Cached

    - by SGWellens
    There was a question from a student over on the Asp.Net forums about improving site performance. The concern was that every time an app setting was read from the Web.Config file, the disk would be accessed. With many app settings and many users, it was believed performance would suffer. Their intent was to create a class to hold all the settings, instantiate it and fill it from the Web.Config file on startup. Then, all the settings would be in RAM. I knew this was not correct and didn't want to just say so without any corroboration, so I did some searching. Surprisingly, this is a common misconception. I found other code postings that cached the app settings from Web.Config. Many people even thanked the posters for the code. In a later post, the student said their text book recommended caching the Web.Config file. OK, here's the deal. The Web.Config file is already cached. You do not need to re-cache it. From this article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa478432.aspx It is important to realize that the entire <appSettings> section is read, parsed, and cached the first time we retrieve a setting value. From that point forward, all requests for setting values come from an in-memory cache, so access is quite fast and doesn't incur any subsequent overhead for accessing the file or parsing the XML. The reason the misconception is prevalent may be because it's hard to search for Web.Config and cache without getting a lot of hits on how to setup caching in the Web.Config file. So here's a string for search engines to index on: "Is the Web.Config file Cached?" A follow up question was, are the connection strings cached? Yes. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178683.aspx At run time, ASP.NET uses the Web.Config files to hierarchically compute a unique collection of configuration settings for each incoming URL request. These settings are calculated only once and then cached on the server. And, as everyone should know, if you modify the Web.Config file, the web application will restart. I hope this helps people to NOT write code! Steve WellensCodeProject

    Read the article

  • Web.Config is Cached

    - by SGWellens
    There was a question from a student over on the Asp.Net forums about improving site performance. The concern was that every time an app setting was read from the Web.Config file, the disk would be accessed. With many app settings and many users, it was believed performance would suffer. Their intent was to create a class to hold all the settings, instantiate it and fill it from the Web.Config file on startup. Then, all the settings would be in RAM. I knew this was not correct and didn't want to just say so without any corroboration, so I did some searching. Surprisingly, this is a common misconception. I found other code postings that cached the app settings from Web.Config. Many people even thanked the posters for the code. In a later post, the student said their text book recommended caching the Web.Config file. OK, here's the deal. The Web.Config file is already cached. You do not need to re-cache it. From this article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa478432.aspx It is important to realize that the entire <appSettings> section is read, parsed, and cached the first time we retrieve a setting value. From that point forward, all requests for setting values come from an in-memory cache, so access is quite fast and doesn't incur any subsequent overhead for accessing the file or parsing the XML. The reason the misconception is prevalent may be because it's hard to search for Web.Config and cache without getting a lot of hits on how to setup caching in the Web.Config file. So here's a string for search engines to index on: "Is the Web.Config file Cached?" A follow up question was, are the connection strings cached? Yes. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178683.aspx At run time, ASP.NET uses the Web.Config files to hierarchically compute a unique collection of configuration settings for each incoming URL request. These settings are calculated only once and then cached on the server. And, as everyone should know, if you modify the Web.Config file, the web application will restart. I hope this helps people to NOT write code!   Steve WellensCodeProject

    Read the article

  • Introducing Visual WebGui's XAML programming model extension for web developers

    - by Visual WebGui
    While ASP.NET provides an event base approach it is completely dismissed when working with AJAX and the richness of the server is lost and replaced with JavaScript programming and couple with a very high security risk. Visual WebGui reinstates the power of the server to AJAX development and provides a statefull yet scalable, server centric architecture that provides the benefits and user productivity of AJAX with the security and developer productivity we had before AJAX stormed into our lives. When...(read more)

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Express and VS2010 Web Application .MDF file errors

    - by nannette
    I installed SQL Server 2008 as well as SQL Server Express 2008 on my new Windows 7 development environment, along with Visual Studio 2010. I could get SQL Server 2008 to work fine, but I could not use Express .MDF databases within sample web application projects without receiving the below error: Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed. For instance, I was creating an ASP.NET Web Application. When...(read more)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387  | Next Page >