Search Results

Search found 17054 results on 683 pages for 'jms request reply'.

Page 380/683 | < Previous Page | 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387  | Next Page >

  • Chrome extension - Localstorage not working

    - by Bjarki Jonasson
    I'm writing a Chrome extension that uses a content script to modify certain parts of a website. The content script worked fine until I tried to add an options page to my extension. Right now I'm using an options.html file to save user preferences to localstorage, as you can see here: <html> <head><title>Options</title></head> <script type="text/javascript"> function save_options() { var select = document.getElementById("width"); var width = select.children[select.selectedIndex].value; localStorage["site_width"] = width; } function restore_options() { var fwidth = localStorage["site_width"]; if (!fwidth) { return; } var select = document.getElementById("width"); for (var i = 0; i < select.children.length; i++) { var child = select.children[i]; if (child.value == fwidth) { child.selected = "true"; break; } } } </script> <body onload="restore_options()"> Width: <select id="width"> <option value="100%">100%</option> <option value="90%">90%</option> <option value="80%">80%</option> <option value="70%">70%</option> </select> <br> <button onclick="save_options()">Save</button> </body> </html> I also have a background.html file to handle the communication between the content script and the localstorage: <html> <script type="text/javascript"> chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener(function(request, sender, sendResponse) { if (request.method == "siteWidth") sendResponse({status: localStorage["site_width"]}); else sendResponse({}); }); </script> </html> Then there's the actual content script that looks like this: var Width; chrome.extension.sendRequest({method: "siteWidth"}, function(response) { width = response.status; }); None of that code actually works. It looks solid enough to me but I'm not a very experienced programmer so I might be wrong. Could someone explain localstorage to me in layman's terms?

    Read the article

  • Trying to run multiple HTTP requests in parallel, but being limited by Windows (registry)

    - by Nailuj
    I'm developing an application (winforms C# .NET 4.0) where I access a lookup functionality from a 3rd party through a simple HTTP request. I call an url with a parameter, and in return I get a small string with the result of the lookup. Simple enough. The challenge is however, that I have to do lots of these lookups (a couple of thousands), and I would like to limit the time needed. Therefore I would like to run requests in parallel (say 10-20). I use a ThreadPool to do this, and the short version of my code looks like this: public void startAsyncLookup(Action<LookupResult> returnLookupResult) { this.returnLookupResult = returnLookupResult; foreach (string number in numbersToLookup) { ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(lookupNumber, number); } } public void lookupNumber(Object threadContext) { string numberToLookup = (string)threadContext; string url = @"http://some.url.com/?number=" + numberToLookup; WebClient webClient = new WebClient(); Stream responseData = webClient.OpenRead(url); LookupResult lookupResult = parseLookupResult(responseData); returnLookupResult(lookupResult); } I fill up numbersToLookup (a List<String>) from another place, call startAsyncLookup and provide it with a call-back function returnLookupResult to return each result. This works, but I found that I'm not getting the throughput I want. Initially I thought it might be the 3rd party having a poor system on their end, but I excluded this by trying to run the same code from two different machines at the same time. Each of the two took as long as one did alone, so I could rule out that one. A colleague then tipped me that this might be a limitation in Windows. I googled a bit, and found amongst others this post saying that by default Windows limits the number of simultaneous request to the same web server to 4 for HTTP 1.0 and to 2 for HTTP 1.1 (for HTTP 1.1 this is actually according to the specification (RFC2068)). The same post referred to above also provided a way to increase these limits. By adding two registry values to [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings] (MaxConnectionsPerServer and MaxConnectionsPer1_0Server), I could control this myself. So, I tried this (sat both to 20), restarted my computer, and tried to run my program again. Sadly though, it didn't seem to help any. I also kept an eye on the Resource Monitor (see screen shot) while running my batch lookup, and I noticed that my application (the one with the title blacked out) still only was using two TCP connections. So, the question is, why isn't this working? Is the post I linked to using the wrong registry values? Is this perhaps not possible to "hack" in Windows any longer (I'm on Windows 7)? Any ideas would be highly appreciated :) And just in case anyone should wonder, I have also tried with different settings for MaxThreads on ThreadPool (everyting from 10 to 100), and this didn't seem to affect my throughput at all, so the problem shouldn't be there either.

    Read the article

  • Debugging deployed azure app

    - by gonzohunter
    Is it possible to attach to a deployed Azure app? I would like to be able to step through the code so that I can see what values are being set in a request to one of my web role actions. I have looked around and the only examples seem to be of debugging when the azure app is running on the local machine.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 2 Cancel Asynchronous Action

    - by Sean Carpenter
    The MSDN documentation for using an asynchronous controller mentions choosing an asynchronous controller when you want to provide a way for users to cancel requests. I couldn't find any documentation related to actually allowing users to cancel asynchronous requests, however. Is there a way to indicate to ASP.Net and/or the MVC framework that a request should be canceled?

    Read the article

  • Submit a form by code

    - by user1440235
    I am trying to programmatically submit a form but get an error that says: SCRIPT5007: Unable to get value of the property 'submit': object is null or undefined verify1.php, line 9 character 5 Can anyone see what I am doing wrong? Here is the code: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> <script type="text/javascript"> function submitform() { document.getElementById("repeatForm").submit(); } </script> </head> <body> <?php require_once('recaptchalib.php'); $privatekey = "6Ld1N9ISAAAAAB_lXt0Es0muh2cfikSgVrUP4ZXh"; $resp = recaptcha_check_answer ($privatekey, $_SERVER["REMOTE_ADDR"], $_POST["recaptcha_challenge_field"], $_POST["recaptcha_response_field"]); if (!$resp->is_valid) { // What happens when the CAPTCHA was entered incorrectly echo '<script language="JavaScript">submitform();</script>'; ; /*echo "<script>window.location.href = 'Information-Request-Voodoo-Websites.php';</script>";*/ } else { echo "<script>window.location.href = 'Confirm-Information-Request.html';</script>"; // Your code here to handle a successful verification } ?> <?php if (isset($_POST['name2'])) $_SESSION['name2'] =$_POST['name2']; if (isset($_POST['phone'])) $_SESSION['phone'] =$_POST['phone']; if (isset($_POST['email'])) $_SESSION['email'] =$_POST['email']; if (isset($_POST['company'])) $_SESSION['company'] =$_POST['company']; if (isset($_POST['pages'])) $_SESSION['pages'] =$_POST['pages']; if (isset($_POST['shopping'])) $_SESSION['shopping'] =$_POST['shopping']; if (isset($_POST['new'])) $_SESSION['new'] =$_POST['new']; if (isset($_POST['general'])) $_SESSION['general'] =$_POST['general']; if (isset($_POST['respond'])) $_SESSION['respond'] =$_POST['respond']; ?> <form id="repeatForm" action="Information-Request-Voodoo-Websites.php" method="post"> <span name="sprytextfield1"> <label for="name2">Please enter your name:</label> <input name="name" type="text" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="name2" value="<?php echo((isset($_POST["name"]))?$_POST["name"]:"") ?>" size="30" /> <span class="textfieldRequiredMsg">A value is required.</span></span> <p><span id="sprytextfield2"> <label for="phone">Please enter your phone number:</label> <input name="phone" type="text" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="phone" value="<?php echo((isset($_POST["phone"]))?$_POST["phone"]:"") ?>" /> <span class="textfieldRequiredMsg">A value is required.</span></span></p> <p><span id="sprytextfield3"> <label for="email">Please enter your email address:</label> <input name="email" type="text" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="email" value="<?php echo((isset($_POST["email"]))?$_POST["email"]:"") ?>" size="40" /> <span class="textfieldRequiredMsg">A value is required.</span><span class="textfieldInvalidFormatMsg">Invalid format.</span></span></p> <p><span id="sprytextarea1"> <label for="company">Enter a brief description of your company:</label> <br /> <textarea name="company" cols="65" rows="3" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="company"><?php echo((isset($_POST["company"]))?$_POST["company"]:"") ?></textarea> <span class="textareaRequiredMsg">A value is required.</span></span></p> <p>Anticipated number of pages:<span id="sprytextfield4"> <label for="pages"></label> <input name="pages" type="text" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="pages" value="<?php echo((isset($_POST["pages"]))?$_POST["pages"]:"") ?>" size="7" /> <span class="textfieldRequiredMsg">A value is required.</span></span><span id="spryselect1"> <label for="shopping">Shopping cart required?</label> <select name="shopping" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="shopping"> <option value="yes">yes</option> <option value="no">no</option> </select> <span class="selectRequiredMsg">Please select an item.</span></span></p> <p><span id="spryselect2"> <label for="new">Does this work concern a new or existing web site?</label> <select name="new" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="new"> <option value="existing" <?php if (!(strcmp("existing", ((isset($_POST["new"]))?$_POST["new"]:"")))) {echo "selected=\"selected\"";} ?>>existing</option> <option value="new" <?php if (!(strcmp("new", ((isset($_POST["new"]))?$_POST["new"]:"")))) {echo "selected=\"selected\"";} ?>>new</option> </select> <span class="selectRequiredMsg">Please select an item.</span></span></p> <p><span id="sprytextarea2"> <label for="general">Add any additiional comments here or ask questions. </label> <textarea name="general" cols="65" rows="4" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="general"><?php echo((isset($_POST["general"]))?$_POST["general"]:"") ?></textarea> </span></p> <p><span id="spryselect3"> <label for="respond">How would you like us to respond?</label> <select name="respond" class="inputTextBoxFormat" id="respond"> <option value="email" <?php if (!(strcmp("email", ((isset($_POST["respond"]))?$_POST["respond"]:"")))) {echo "selected=\"selected\"";} ?>>email</option> <option value="phone" <?php if (!(strcmp("phone", ((isset($_POST["respond"]))?$_POST["respond"]:"")))) {echo "selected=\"selected\"";} ?>>phone</option> </select> <input type="submit" name="formSubmit" value="Submit" /> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • How Does One Differentiate Between Routes POSTed To In Asp.Net MVC?

    - by Laz
    I have two actions, one that accepts a ViewModel and one that accepts two parameters a string and an int, when I try to post to the action, it gives me an error telling me that the current request is ambiguous between the two actions. Is it possible to indicate to the routing system which action is the relevant one, and if it is how is it done?

    Read the article

  • How to return a property name when comparing two properties at class-level

    - by CodeMonkey
    Hi I have implemented an 'EqualTo' Validation Attribute, that compares two Properties of an object, during ModelBinding in ASP.NET MVC 2. The problem I have is not with it not working, because it does work. The problem is, when I do my request - which is an ajax request - I get back errors to my front-end, where it sets a class on the input fields to indicate invalid input. What it does is iterate through a list of Errors (in a JsonResult), and set a class. This is all dandy. But the ValidationAtrribute I am having trouble with is set at a Class-level, i.e., it's not like other ValidationAttributes where you set something like "[Required]" or something like that. [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple=true, Inherited=false)] public class EqualToAttribute : ValidationAttribute { public String SourceProperty { get; set; } public String MatchProperty { get; set; } public EqualToAttribute(string source, string match) { SourceProperty = source; MatchProperty = match; } public override Boolean IsValid(Object value) { Type objectType = value.GetType(); PropertyInfo[] properties = objectType.GetProperties(); object sourceValue = new object(); object matchValue = new object(); Type sourceType = null; Type matchType = null; int counter = 0; foreach (PropertyInfo propertyInfo in properties) { if (propertyInfo.Name == SourceProperty || propertyInfo.Name == MatchProperty) { if (counter == 0) { sourceValue = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null); sourceType = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null).GetType(); } if (counter == 1) { matchValue = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null); matchType = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null).GetType(); } counter++; if (counter == 2) { break; } } } if (sourceType != null && matchType != null) { return sourceValue.ToString().Equals(matchValue.ToString()); //return Convert.ChangeType(sourceValue, sourceType) == Convert.ChangeType(matchValue, matchType); } return false; } private object _typeId = new object(); public override object TypeId { get { return this._typeId; } } } Now this code works, except for the fact that the validation process does not return which Property failed. And I simply can't figure out how to make it return one of the two. In reality I don't care which one it returns.. because both are failing.. Do you have an idea how to make it return the/or both Property/Properties that is/are failing.

    Read the article

  • How to implement a caching model without violating MVC pattern?

    - by RPM1984
    Hi Guys, I have an ASP.NET MVC 3 (Razor) Web Application, with a particular page which is highly database intensive, and user experience is of the upmost priority. Thus, i am introducing caching on this particular page. I'm trying to figure out a way to implement this caching pattern whilst keeping my controller thin, like it currently is without caching: public PartialViewResult GetLocationStuff(SearchPreferences searchPreferences) { var results = _locationService.FindStuffByCriteria(searchPreferences); return PartialView("SearchResults", results); } As you can see, the controller is very thin, as it should be. It doesn't care about how/where it is getting it's info from - that is the job of the service. A couple of notes on the flow of control: Controllers get DI'ed a particular Service, depending on it's area. In this example, this controller get's a LocationService Services call through to an IQueryable<T> Repository and materialize results into T or ICollection<T>. How i want to implement caching: I can't use Output Caching - for a few reasons. First of all, this action method is invoked from the client-side (jQuery/AJAX), via [HttpPost], which according to HTTP standards should not be cached as a request. Secondly, i don't want to cache purely based on the HTTP request arguments - the cache logic is a lot more complicated than that - there is actually two-level caching going on. As i hint to above, i need to use regular data-caching, e.g Cache["somekey"] = someObj;. I don't want to implement a generic caching mechanism where all calls via the service go through the cache first - i only want caching on this particular action method. First thought's would tell me to create another service (which inherits LocationService), and provide the caching workflow there (check cache first, if not there call db, add to cache, return result). That has two problems: The services are basic Class Libraries - no references to anything extra. I would need to add a reference to System.Web here. I would have to access the HTTP Context outside of the web application, which is considered bad practice, not only for testability, but in general - right? I also thought about using the Models folder in the Web Application (which i currently use only for ViewModels), but having a cache service in a models folder just doesn't sound right. So - any ideas? Is there a MVC-specific thing (like Action Filter's, for example) i can use here? General advice/tips would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Cannot deploy asp.net openid library on shared hosting service

    - by asksuperuser
    I have deployed successfully the dotnetopenid dll under IIS7 but on my shared hosting service it says: Compilation Error Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately. Compiler Error Message: CS0246: The type or namespace name 'DotNetOpenId' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) Why ?

    Read the article

  • Jquery AJAX: How to display the Flash error message when validation on the server side fails?

    - by Shripad K
    I am using the Jquery form plugin to submit the form via ajax. I have set up validations on the server side in my models. Now when the validation fails i want to display the same flash[:error] message to the user using ajax. If the validation succeeds I can display the flash[:notice] as it is available after the request is completed. How do i go about displaying flash[:error]?

    Read the article

  • Performance, serve all CSS at once, or as its needed?

    - by yaya3
    As far as I know, these days there are two main techniques used for including CSS in a website. A) Provide all the CSS used by the website in one (compressed) file B) Provide the CSS for required by the elements on the page that is currently being viewed only Positives for A: The entire CSS used on the site is cached on first visit via 1 http request Negatives for A: if it's a big file, it will take a long time to load initially Positives for B: Faster initial load time Negatives for B: More HTTP requests, more files to cache Is there anything (fundamental) that I am missing here?

    Read the article

  • Create a ASP.NET Generic gridview

    - by harold-sota
    I wont to create a User Control based in gridview that have the edit add delete incorporate, the problem is these: In the admin part of my web site i have to repeat the same action for view add delete update the data for different datasource. I wont to create a generic gridview that have incorporate these action. The gridview can take a xml file for configure him self dependently of the request for desplay the data. Any ideas how i can do it?

    Read the article

  • Django url tag multiple parameters

    - by Overdose
    I have two similar codes. The first one works as expected. urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^(?P<n1>\d)/test/', test), (r'', test2), {% url testapp.views.test n1=5 %} But adding the second parameter makes the result return empty string. urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^(?P<n1>\d)/test(?P<n2>\d)/', test), (r'', test2),) {% url testapp.views.test n1=5, n2=2 %} Views signature: def test(request, n1, n2=1):

    Read the article

  • Custom membership provider via WCF authorization question

    - by Diego
    I've made a global authentication via WCF to use with the most of our systems, but found that load data via WCF not very so fast. What I need to do now is verify every time that the page is loading if the user has access granted to that page.... Its a good pratice to go back in WCF request this info for every page that the user access?This will not slow down my entire system?

    Read the article

  • Can I not submit a form to a servlet from JSF?

    - by simpatico
    * Unable to find matching navigation case with from-view-id '/home.xhtml' for action 'MemoServlet' with outcome 'MemoServlet' I try to accomplish it through: <h:commandButton type="submit" value="add" action="MemoServlet"/> but all the tutorials in the world only do it with a bean, which i don't want. I've come across any navigation rule that accomplishes my request.

    Read the article

  • Robust Large File Transfer with WCF

    - by Sharov
    I want to transfer big files (1GB) over unreliable transport channels. When connection is interrupted, I don't want start file transfering from the begining. I can partially store it in a temp table and store last readed position, so when connection is reestablished I can request continue uploading of file from this position. Is there any best-practice for such kind of things. I'm currently use chunking channel.

    Read the article

  • Synchronous database reads inside IHttpAsyncHandler

    - by sayao
    On asp.net if i call a synchronous database query inside an IHttpAsyncHandler with delegate.BeginInvoke, would it still release the asp.net worker thread while reading the database? For example, this post: http://madskristensen.net/post/How-to-use-the-IHttpAsyncHandler-in-ASPNET.aspx If i put a synchronous database call inside ServeContent, would the request still happen asynchronously?

    Read the article

  • JSF commandButton URL parameters

    - by DD
    Hi, I would like to make a button which navigates to a different URL and pass some request parameters through in the URL. The outputLink works but I would like a button, the commandButton looks good but I can pass parameters. Is there a solution? Thanks, Dwayne

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387  | Next Page >