Search Results

Search found 42327 results on 1694 pages for 'microsoft sql t sql'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 385/1694 | < Previous Page | 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392  | Next Page >

  • Reset SQL variable inside SELECT statement

    - by Jason McCreary
    I am trying to number some rows on a bridge table with a single UPDATE/SELECT statement using a counter variable @row. For example: UPDATE teamrank JOIN (SELECT @row := @row + 1 AS position, name FROM members) USING(teamID, memberID) SET rank = position Is something like this possible or do I need to create a cursor? If it helps, I am using MySQL 5.

    Read the article

  • SQL: count days in date range?

    - by John Isaacks
    I have a query like this: SELECT COUNT(*) AS amount FROM daily_individual_tracking WHERE sales = 'YES' AND daily_individual_tracking_date BETWEEN '2010-01-01' AND '2010-03-31' I am selected from a date range. Is there a way to also get the total days in the date range?

    Read the article

  • Adding more OR searches with CONTAINS Brings Query to Crawl

    - by scolja
    I have a simple query that relies on two full-text indexed tables, but it runs extremely slow when I have the CONTAINS combined with any additional OR search. As seen in the execution plan, the two full text searches crush the performance. If I query with just 1 of the CONTAINS, or neither, the query is sub-second, but the moment you add OR into the mix the query becomes ill-fated. The two tables are nothing special, they're not overly wide (42 cols in one, 21 in the other; maybe 10 cols are FT indexed in each) or even contain very many records (36k recs in the biggest of the two). I was able to solve the performance by splitting the two CONTAINS searches into their own SELECT queries and then UNION the three together. Is this UNION workaround my only hope? Thanks. SELECT a.CollectionID FROM collections a INNER JOIN determinations b ON a.CollectionID = b.CollectionID WHERE a.CollrTeam_Text LIKE '%fa%' OR CONTAINS(a.*, '"*fa*"') OR CONTAINS(b.*, '"*fa*"') Execution Plan (guess I need more reputation before I can post the image):

    Read the article

  • SQL query multi table selection

    - by nemiss
    I have 3 tables, - Section table that defines some general item sections. - Category table - has a "section" column (foreign key). - Product table - has a "category" column (foreign key). I want to get all products that belong to X section. How can I do it? select from select?

    Read the article

  • Linq to SQL - design question.

    - by UshaP
    HI, Currently i have one big datacontex with 35 tables (i dragged all my DB tables to the designer). I must admit it is very comfortable cause i have ORM to my full DB and query with linq is easy and simple. My questions are: 1. Would you consider it bad design to have one datacontext with 35 tables or should i split it to logic units? 2. Is there any performance penalties for using such a big datacontext? Thanks, Pini.

    Read the article

  • SQL Analysis Services - Dimension attributes with a "many" cardinality

    - by MonkeyBrother
    I am creating a cube with the following tables: Customer CustomerID, Name Customer Rep CustomerID, RepID Rep RepID, Name The important thing here is that there is a many to many relationship between Reps and Customers. I want to be able to ask the question "How much sales for customers working with rep 'A'?" In the data source view i set up the relationships between both customerid columns and both repid columns. I set up the rep attribute in the dimension builder and when I try to build the cube I get this error: Errors in the high-level relationship engine. the 'Rep' table that is required for a join cannot be reached based on the relationships in the data source view.

    Read the article

  • Is is faster to filter and get data or filter then get data ?

    - by remi bourgarel
    Hi I have this kind of request : SELECT myTable.ID, myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID = myTable.ID and myLink.FID2 = 666) myLink has a lot of rows. Do you think it's faster to do like this : SELECT myLink.FID INTO @result FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID2 = 666 UPDATE @result SET Adress = myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE myTable.ID = @result.ID

    Read the article

  • Trigger on database using a web application and a winform application

    - by Michael
    Hello all, Situation: I have a web application which shows errors and where you can accept those error messages. I also have a service, which checks errors from a system and sets the error messages in the database. When I accept an error in the web application, i would like the service to know which error message has been accepted, so that it can do some other actions. My guess is that this could be done through some sort of trigger, but i can't figure out how. Can anyone help me with this?

    Read the article

  • Assign the results of a stored procedure into a variable in another stored procedure

    - by RHPT
    The title of this question is a bit misleading, but I couldn't summarize this very well. I have two stored procedures. The first stored procedure (s_proc1) calls a second stored procedure (s_proc2). I want to assign the value returned from s_proc2 to a variable in s_proc1. Currently, I'm calling s_proc2 (inside s_proc1) in this manner: EXEC s_proc2 @SiteID, @count = @PagingCount OUTPUT s_proc2 contains a dynamic query statement (for reasons I will not outline here). CREATE dbo.s_proc2 ( @siteID int, @count int OUTPUT ) AS DECLARE @sSQL nvarchar(100) DECLARE @xCount int SELECT @sSQL = 'SELECT COUNT(ID) FROM Authors' EXEC sp_ExecuteSQL @sSQL, N'@xCount int output', @xCount output SET @count = @xCount RETURN @count Will this result in @PagingCount having the value of @count? I ask because the result I am getting from s_proc1 is wonky. In fact, what I do get is two results. The first being @count, then the result of s_proc1 (which is incorrect). So, it makes me wonder if @PagingCount isn't being set properly. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Parameters in stored procedures in SQL Server

    - by Sanju
    How many types of parameters are there in a stored procedures and what are they? Thanks in advance. And can we delete a table using view? I think yes but in what situation we can't delete it if there are no trigger associated with that table. I mean to say i need to delete a table which has no trigger associated with it using view, in which case i can't delete it?

    Read the article

  • SQL - table alias scope.

    - by Support - multilanguage SO
    I've just learned ( yesterday ) to use "exists" instead of "in". BAD select * from table where nameid in ( select nameid from othertable where otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) GOOD select * from table t where exists ( select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) And I have some questions about this: 1) The explanation as I understood was: "The reason why this is better is because only the matching values will be returned instead of building a massive list of possible results". Does that mean that while the first subquery might return 900 results the second will return only 1 ( yes or no )? 2) In the past I have had the RDBMS complainin: "only the first 1000 rows might be retrieved", this second approach would solve that problem? 3) What is the scope of the alias in the second subquery?... does the alias only lives in the parenthesis? for example select * from table t where exists ( select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeDesc' ) AND select nameid from othertable o where t.nameid = o.nameid and otherdesc = 'SomeOtherDesc' ) That is, if I use the same alias ( o for table othertable ) In the second "exist" will it present any problem with the first exists? or are they totally independent? Is this something Oracle only related or it is valid for most RDBMS? Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to split the results of a select query into two equal halfs?

    - by Matthias
    I'd like to have a query returning two ResultSets each of which holding exactly half of all records matching a certain criteria. I tried using TOP 50 PERCENT in conjunction with an Order By but if the number of records in the table is odd, one record will show up in both resultsets. Example: I've got a simple table with TheID (PK) and TheValue fields (varchar(10)) and 5 records. Skip the where clause for now. SELECT TOP 50 PERCENT * FROM TheTable ORDER BY TheID asc results in the selected id's 1,2,3 SELECT TOP 50 PERCENT * FROM TheTable ORDER BY TheID desc results in the selected id's 3,4,5 3 is a dup. In real life of course the queries are fairly complicated with a ton of where clauses and subqueries.

    Read the article

  • What's the difference between these SQL conditions?

    - by wesley luan
    Select * from Example where 1 = Case when :index = 0 then Case when DateEx Between :pDat1 and :pDate2 then 1 end else Case When :index = 1 or :index = 2 then Case When DateEx >= :pDat1 then 1 end end end And Select * from Example where 1 = Case when :index = 0 then Case when DateEx Between :pDat1 and :pDat2 then 1 end else 1 end and 1 = Case When :index = 1 or :index = 2 then Case When DateEx >= :pDat1 then 1 end end

    Read the article

  • FreeText Query is slow - includes TOP and Order By

    - by Eric P
    The Product table has 700K records in it. The query: SELECT TOP 1 ID, Name FROM Product WHERE contains(Name, '"White Dress"') ORDER BY DateMadeNew desc takes about 1 minute to run. There is an non-clustered index on DateMadeNew and FreeText index on Name. If I remove TOP 1 or Order By - it takes less then 1 second to run. Here is the link to execution plan. http://screencast.com/t/ZDczMzg5N Looks like FullTextMatch has over 400K executions. Why is this happening? How can it be made faster?

    Read the article

  • question in sql server 2005 Proc

    - by bassam
    i have this Proc CREATE Proc [dbo].Salse_Ditail -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @Report_Form varchar(1) , @DateFrom datetime , @DateTo datetime , @COMPANYID varchar(3), @All varchar(1) , @All1 varchar(1) , @All2 varchar(1) , @All3 varchar(1) , @All4 varchar(1) , @All5 varchar(1) , @Sector varchar(10), @Report_Parameter nvarchar(max) as BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. DECLARE @STRWhere nvarchar(max) IF @All5=0 AND @All4=0 AND @All3=0 AND @All2=0 AND @All1=0 and @All=1 set @STRWhere= N'and Sector_id = @Sector' if @Report_Form =1 or @Report_Form =3 or @Report_Form =4 SELECT RETURNREASONCODEID, SITE,SITE_NAME,Factory_id,Factory_Name,Sector_id,sector_name,Customer_name, Customer_id,ITEMID,ITEMNAME,SALESMANID,SALESMAN_NAME,Net_Qty,Net_Salse,Gross_Sales,Gross_Qty, NETWEIGHT_Gross,NETWEIGHT_salse_Gross,NETWEIGHT_NET,NETWEIGHT_salse_NET,Return_Sales,Free_Good, CollectionAmount FROM hal_bas_new_rep WHERE DATAAREAID =@COMPANYID AND INVOICEDATE >= @DateFrom AND INVOICEDATE <= @DateTo and Report_Activti = @Report_Form if @Report_Form =2 SELECT RETURNREASONCODEID , RETURNREASONDESC, SITE , SITE_NAME , Factory_id , Factory_Name , Sector_id , sector_name , Customer_name , Customer_id , ITEMID , ITEMNAME , SALESMANID , SALESMAN_NAME , Return_Sales FROM dbo.hal_bas_new_rep WHERE DATAAREAID =@COMPANYID AND INVOICEDATE >= @DateFrom AND INVOICEDATE <= @DateTo and Report_Activti = @Report_Form and RETURNREASONCODEID in ( SELECT Val FROM dbo.fn_String_To_Table(@Report_Parameter,',',1) ) /* @STRWhere question how i can but the virble here */ end GO i want to but virble put a variable under where Expression and from this function buc I have many function i want to add if any one have answer pls send me

    Read the article

  • Should i really use integer primary IDs [sql]

    - by arthurprs
    For example, i always generate an auto-increment field for the users table, but i also specifies an UNIQUE index on their usernames. There is situations that i first need to get the userId for a given username and then execute the desired query. Or use a JOIN in the desired query. It's 2 trips to the database or a JOIN vs. a varchar index The above is just an example There is a real performance benefit on INT over small VARCHAR indexes? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Insert into ... Select *, how to ignore identity?

    - by Haoest
    I have a temp table with the exact structure of a concrete table T. It was created like this: select top 0 * into #tmp from T After processing and filling in content into #tmp, I want to copy the content back to T like this: insert into T select * from #tmp This is okay as long as T doesn't have identity column, but in my case it does. Is there anyways I can ignore the auto-increment identity column from #tmp when I copy to T? My motivation is to avoid having to spell out every column name in the Insert Into list. EDIT: toggling identity_insert wouldn't work because the pkeys in #tmp may collide with those in T if rows were inserted into T outside of my script, that's if #tmp has auto-incremented the pkey to sync with T's in the first place.

    Read the article

  • Populating a WPF listbox with items from an SQL (SDF) database

    - by xplinux557
    I have been searching on how to do this for a very long time, and I have not managed to get a straight answer on the subject, so hopefully one of you StackOverflow users will be able to help me here. I have a WPF ListBox named CategoryList and a SDF database called ProgramsList.sdf (with two tables called CategoryList and ProgramsList). What I wish my program to do is get the category names from the CategoryList table and list them in the ListBox control called CategoryList. Here's the code that I tried, but it only caused my program to crash. SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection("Data Source=" + AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory + "ProgramsList.sdf"); SqlDataReader myReader = null; myConnection.Open(); CategoryList.Items.Clear(); SqlDataReader dr = new SqlCommand("SELECT Name FROM CategoryList ORDER BY Name DESC", myConnection).ExecuteReader(); while (myReader.Read()) { CategoryList.Items.Add(dr.GetInt32(0)); } myConnection.Close(); Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • How to get only the date from the sql server

    - by Pradeep
    this is what i want. but i have put only a specified date. SELECT BookName, Author, BookPrice FROM Book WHERE Book.Book_ID = ( SELECT Book_ID FROM Temp_Order WHERE Temp_Order.User_ID = 25 AND Temp_Order.OrderDate='3/24/2010' ) this is the date function i used. but it takes the time also. how to stop it. please help me SELECT Book_ID, BookName,Author,BookPrice FROM Book INNER JOIN FavCategory ON Book.Category_ID = FavCategory.Category_ID WHERE FavCategory.User_ID = " + useridlabel.Text + " AND OrderDate = **GETDATE()**

    Read the article

  • Selecting the 2nd row in sql

    - by Alex Chen
    I want to select the second row only from the table. From the ClientUserName column. SELECT ClientUserName, DestHost, count(DestHost) counts FROM #ProxyLog_record WHERE ClientUserName = (Select top 1 ClientUserName from #ProxyLog_count_2) GROUP BY ClientUserName, DestHost ORDER BY counts DESC The (Select top 1 ClientUserName from #ProxyLog_count_2) shows top 1 only but I need to get the 2nd data from that table. How can I do this?

    Read the article

  • Connecting to an MS SQL Server from Silverlight?

    - by cam
    Normally, I would use a PHP webservice to do this, but since the front-end is hosted on a linux box, I need another way to do this (so I don't have to go through the trouble of installing FreeTDS, etc. I will if I have to). Is there a better way to do this? I'm not a web guy, but I'm trying my best.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392  | Next Page >