Search Results

Search found 79317 results on 3173 pages for 'sql error messages'.

Page 385/3173 | < Previous Page | 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392  | Next Page >

  • SQL Query - group by more than one column, but distinct

    - by Ranhiru
    I have a bidding table, as follows: SellID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES SellItem(SellID), CusID INT FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Customer(CusID), Amount FLOAT NOT NULL, BidTime DATETIME DEFAULT getdate() Now in my website I need to show the user the current bids; only the highest bid but without repeating the same user. SELECT CusID, Max(Amount) FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC This is the best I have achieved so far. This gives the CusID of each user with the maximum bid and it is ordered ascending. But I need to get the BidTime for each result as well. When I try to put the BidTime in to the query: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC I am told that "Column 'Bid.BidTime' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause." Thus I tried: SELECT CusID, Max(Amount), BidTime FROM Bid WHERE SellID = 10 GROUP BY CusID, BidTime ORDER BY Max(Amount) DESC But this returns all the rows. No distinction. Any suggestions on solving this issue?

    Read the article

  • Manage Foreign key and Drop downlist for optional field in .NET

    - by Brij
    What is the best way to handle following situation? A dropdown(for master table) is optional in a particular form. But, In database table the field is constrained with foreign key. If user don't select from dropdown then It creates problem because of foreign key. One solution is to create default option in master table and use it in case of blank selection. but in dropdown, we need to handle this to show on top. Is it perfect solution? Is there any other optimized solution for this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Selecting a user-defined scalar function that takes as a parameter another field

    - by ghills
    I have a table a with a list of id's, and a user-defined function foo(id) that takes the id and returns a VARCHAR(20). What I am trying to do is: SELECT id, foo(id) AS 'text field' FROM a However, instead of calling the function for each ID number, like I desired, the text comes back the same for every row. I have tested the foo() function manually with the returned ID's and it does not have that problem, so I realize I must not understand something about the evaluation of the query.

    Read the article

  • How do I get the entity framework to work with archive flags?

    - by Orion Adrian
    I'm trying to create a set of tables where we don't actually delete them, but rather we set the archive flags instead. When we delete an entity, it shouldn't be deleted, it should be marked as archived instead. What are the programming patterns to support this? I would also prefer not to have to roll out my own stored procs for every table that have these archive flags if there is another solution.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Indexing

    - by durilai
    I am trying to understand what is going on with CREATE INDEX internally. When I create a NONCLUSTERED index it shows as an INSERT in the execution plan as well as when I get the query test. DECLARE @sqltext VARBINARY(128) SELECT @sqltext = sql_handle FROM sys.sysprocesses s WHERE spid = 73 --73 is the process creating the index SELECT TEXT FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(@sqltext) GO Show: insert [dbo].[tbl] select * from [dbo].[tbl] option (maxdop 1) This is consistent in the execution plan. Any info is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Will this force a reinitialize in Merge Replication Topology?

    - by Refracted Paladin
    I need to add a couple of columns to a table that is a part of a replication set. It is not a constraint coulumn or a part of any article filters and it allows NULL. I have a pretty good idea that I can run this -- ALTER TABLE tblPlanDomain ADD ReportWageES VARCHAR (100) NULL and NOT force all my clients to reinitialize but I was hoping for some reassurance. Can anyone verify this one way or the other for me? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • stored procedure vs UDF

    - by TheObserver
    I have a select statement and in a couple of the fields, I want to check if an entry for the record exists in another table and if it does, output 1 value and if it doesn't, provide another value. What would be the best way to do it? When would you use a stored procedure and when would you use a UDF?

    Read the article

  • Using SQL Server Intergration Services (SSIS) can you read a file from a FileStream column in SQL Se

    - by tbrovold
    I am trying to create a tool that I can upload different types of files "csv", Excel, XML and load those files into a FileStream column in the database as "Source" untouched over the web. Then using SSIS on the server I want to create a package that will process that file to be loaded into other tables to be used by the web application. Is it possible to have SSIS read a file from FileStream column? if so how?

    Read the article

  • T SQL Count question

    - by johniom
    I'm making a report at work which looks at 5 columns which all contain v1aa, v1ab and v1ac. What I want to do is count up all the v1aa in the 5 columns and show the results (and the same for v1ab and v1ac) An example of how I like it to be displayed as is as follows :- Amber = 3 (v1aa code) Blue = 2 (v1ab code) Red = 1 (v1ac code) Could anyone give me any tips how to get me started?

    Read the article

  • How to properly name record creation(insertion) datetime field ?

    - by alpav
    If I create a table with datetime default getdate() field that is intended to keep date&time of record insertion, which name is better to use for that field ? I like to use Created and I've seen people use DateCreated or CreateDate. Other possible candidates that I can think of are: CreatedDate, CreateTime, TimeCreated, CreateDateTime, DateTimeCreated, RecordCreated, Inserted, InsertedDate, ... From my point of view anything with Date inside name looks bad because it can be confused with date part in case if I have 2 fields: CreateDate,CreateTime, so I wonder if there are any specific recommendations/standards in that area based on real reasons, not just style, mood or consistency. Of course, if there are 100 existing tables and this is table 101 then I would use same naming convention as used in those 100 tables for the sake of consistency, but this question is about first table in first database in first server in first application.

    Read the article

  • Select distinct from multiple fields using sql

    - by Bryan
    I have 5 columns corresponding to answers in a trivia game database - right, wrong1, wrong2, wrong3, wrong4 I want to return all possible answers without duplicates. I was hoping to accomplish this without using a temp table. Is it possible to use something similar to this?: select c1, c2, count(*) from t group by c1, c2 But this returns 3 columns. I would like one column of distinct answers. Thanks for your time

    Read the article

  • Need Help with SQL Subquery

    - by Pete Augello
    Hey: I am trying to write a query that will return all orders that only have a Subscription included. It is easy enough to write a query that includes all Orders with Subscriptions, another that includes all orders without a Subscription and then compare them with an unmatched query. But I don't want to have to store Queries in my Access database, I prefer to have it all in my ASP code, and I can't get this to work with just one complex query. Here are samples of what works if I store them: Query1 SELECT tblOrders.OrderID, tblOrderItems.ProductID FROM tblOrders INNER JOIN tblOrderItems ON tblOrders.OrderID = tblOrderItems.OrderID WHERE ((Not ((tblOrderItems.ProductID)=12 And (tblOrderItems.ProductID)<=15))); Query2 SELECT tblOrders.OrderID, tblOrderItems.ProductID FROM tblOrders INNER JOIN tblOrderItems ON tblOrders.OrderID = tblOrderItems.OrderID WHERE ((((tblOrderItems.ProductID)=12 And (tblOrderItems.ProductID)<=15))); Query3 SELECT Query2.OrderID, Query2.ProductID FROM Query2 LEFT JOIN Query1 ON Query2.OrderID = Query1.OrderID WHERE (((Query1.OrderID) Is Null)); So, my question is 'how do I write Query3 so that it doesn't refer to Query1 or Query2?' or, am I missing some other way do do this? Thanks, Pete [email protected]

    Read the article

  • How to combine specific column values in an SQL statement

    - by Mehper C. Palavuzlar
    There are two variables in our database called OB and B2B_OB. There are EP codes and each EP may have one of the following 4 combinations: EP OB B2B_OB --- -- ------ 3 X 7 X 11 14 X X What I want to do is to combine the X's in the fetched list so that I can have A or B value for a single EP. My conditions are: IF (OB IS NULL AND B2B_OB IS NULL) THEN TYPE = A IF (OB IS NOT NULL OR B2B_OB IS NOT NULL) THEN TYPE = B The list I want to fetch is like this one: EP TYPE --- ---- 3 B 7 B 11 A 14 B How can I do this in my query? TIA.

    Read the article

  • can i expose SSMS 2005 Schema Change Report in sharepoint?

    - by dg
    a schema change was made on a production server that generates feeds to our parters, removing two bytes from a field, which clobbered our partner's jobs. my boss wants a notification mechanism to propagate schema changes to everyone, but instead of writing something, id like to get the schema change history report exposed on sharepoint somehow. is that possible? thanks very much for your help drew

    Read the article

  • Polymorphism in SQL database tables?

    - by Patrick Daryll Glandien
    I currently have multiple tables in my database which consist of the same 'basic fields' like: name character varying(100), description text, url character varying(255) But I have multiple specializations of that basic table, which is for example that tv_series has the fields season, episode, airing, while the movies table has release_date, budget etc. Now at first this is not a problem, but I want to create a second table, called linkgroups with a Foreign Key to these specialized tables. That means I would somehow have to normalize it within itself. One way of solving this I have heard of is to normalize it with a key-value-pair-table, but I do not like that idea since it is kind of a 'database-within-a-database' scheme, I do not have a way to require certain keys/fields nor require a special type, and it would be a huge pain to fetch and order the data later. So I am looking for a way now to 'share' a Primary Key between multiple tables or even better: a way to normalize it by having a general table and multiple specialized tables.

    Read the article

  • Do I have to use mysql_real_escape_string if I bind parameters?

    - by Babak
    I have the following code: function dbPublish($status) { global $dbcon, $dbtable; if(isset($_GET['itemId'])) { $sqlQuery = 'UPDATE ' . $dbtable . ' SET active = ? WHERE id = ?'; $stmt = $dbcon->prepare($sqlQuery); $stmt->bind_param('ii', $status, $_GET['itemId']); $stmt->execute(); $stmt->close(); } } Do I need to mysql_real_escape_string in this case or am i okay?

    Read the article

  • autoincrement in access sql is not working

    - by Thunder
    how can i create a table with autoincrement in access.Here is what i have been doing but not working. CREATE TABLE People_User_Master( Id INTEGER primary key AUTOINCREMENT , Name varchar(50) , LastName varchar(50) , Userid varchar(50) unique , Email varchar(50) , Phone varchar(50) , Pw varchar(50) , fk_Group int , Address varchar(150) )

    Read the article

  • SQL model optimization question

    - by supermogx
    I need to keep track of number of "hits" on a particular item in a DB. The thing is that the "hits" should stay unique with a user ID, so if a user hits the item 3 times, it should still count for a hit of 1. Also, I need to display the total number of hits for a particular item. Is there a better way than to store each hits for each items by each users in a separate table? Would keeping the user ID in a string separated by commas a better and efficient way?

    Read the article

  • SQL 2008 pivot without aggregate

    - by Bryan Lewis
    I have table to test score data that I need to pivot and I am stuck on how to do it. I have the data as this: gradelistening speaking reading writing 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 399.4 423.8 0.0 0.0 2 461.6 508.4 424.2 431.5 3 501.0 525.9 492.8 491.3 4 521.9 517.4 488.7 486.7 5 555.1 581.1 547.2 538.2 6 562.7 545.5 498.2 530.2 7 560.5 525.8 545.3 562.0 8 580.9 548.7 551.4 560.3 9 602.4 550.2 586.8 564.1 10 623.4 581.1 589.9 568.5 11 633.3 578.3 598.1 568.2 12 626.0 588.8 600.5 564.8 But I need it like this: gr0 gr1 gr2 gr3 gr4 gr5 gr6 gr7 ... listening 0.0 399.4 461.6 501.0 521.9 555.1 562.7 560.5 580.9... speaking 0.0 423.8... reading 0.0 0.0 424.2... writing 0.0 0.0 431.5... I don't need to aggregate anything, just pivot the data.

    Read the article

  • Removing characters from a alphanumeric field SQL

    - by LS
    Im moving data from one table to another using insert into. in the select bit need to transfer from column with characters and numerical in to another with only the numerical. The original column is in varchar format. original column - ABC100 XYZ:200 DD2000 Wanted column 100 200 2000 Cant write a function because cant have a function in side select statement when inserting

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392  | Next Page >