Search Results

Search found 14348 results on 574 pages for 'planet mysql'.

Page 389/574 | < Previous Page | 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396  | Next Page >

• Select past date from database x days from now

  - by Pr0no

  Consider the following table daterange _date trading_day ------------------------ 2011-08-01 1 2011-07-31 0 2011-07-30 0 2011-07-29 1 2011-07-28 1 2011-07-27 1 2011-07-26 1 2011-07-25 1 2011-07-24 0 2011-07-23 0 2011-07-22 1 2011-07-21 1 2011-07-20 1 2011-07-19 1 2011-07-18 1 2011-07-17 0 I'm in need of a query that returns a _date, x days before a given _date. When counting back, _days with trading_day = 0 should be ignored. A few examples: input | output -------------------------+------------ 1 day before 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-18 2 days before 2011-08-01 | 2011-07-28 (trading_day = 0 don't count) 3 days before 2011-07-29 | 2001-07-26 The first one is easy: SELECT _date FROM daterange WHERE trading_day = 0 AND _date < '2011-07-19' LIMIT 1 But I don't know how to query for the other examples. Do you?

  Read the article

• Yii 'limit' on related model's scope

  - by pethee

  I have a model called Guesses that has_many Comments. I'm making eager queries to this to then pass on as JSON as response to an API call. The relations are obviously set between the two models and they are correct(one2many <= belongs2) I added a scope to Comments called 'api' like this: public function scopes() { return array( 'api' => array( 'select' => 'id, comment, date', 'limit'=>3, 'order'=>'date DESC', 'together'=>true, ), ); } And I'm running the following one-liner query: $data = Guesses::model()->with('comments:api')->findAll(); The issue here is that when calling the 'api' scope using a with('relation'), the limit property simply doesn't apply. I added the 'together'=true there for another type of scope, plus I hear it might help. It doesn't make a difference. I don't need all the comments of all Guesses. I want the top 3 (or 5). I am also trying to keep the one-liner call intact and simple, manage everything through scopes, relations and parameterized functions so that the API call itself is clean and simple. Any advice?

  Read the article

• What information about a user is available via PHP?

  - by Camran

  This is about a classifieds website, where anyone may post classifieds. I have a security database which I intend to fill with information about the user who posts the classifieds. I intend to record information such as IP, name, tel, email, classified_text, classified_title etc etc. The reason for all this is that sometimes people become victims of fraud (fake classifieds etc). So I wonder, what information is possible to get from the poster which may help in tracking him/her down? IP is a given, but what else could be useful? And I would much like examples of how it would be useful also, as well as the code for it please, like $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']. And btw, I use PHP and have Sql as a database. Thanks

  Read the article

• Best way to update record X when Y is inserted

  - by Saif Bechan

  I have a huge table that is mainly used for backup and administrative purposes. The only records that matters is the last inserted record. On every hit to order by time inserted is just too slow. I want keep a separate table with the last inserted id. In PHP I now insert, get last inserted id, and update the other table. Is there a more efficient way to do this.

  Read the article

• Is there any inbuilt function to insert values in db used in Joomla framework?

  - by Parth

  Is there any inbuilt function to insert values in db used in Joomla framework?

  Read the article

• Very weird jquery/json problem...

  - by Scarface

  Hey guys I have finally located the cause of this problem...I just have no idea how to fix it and why it is happening. I have a jquery getjson function and it returns 0 results every 2-5 clicks on new topics or refreshes. For some reason if I change my query to sort results by ASC it always returns results and much quicker, but this poses a problem since I need results by DESC. If anyone has any ideas, I would greatly appreciate it because I am dumbfounded at this point. Here is my query but I need it by DESC SELECT time, user, message FROM comments WHERE topic_id='$topic_id' ORDER BY time ASC LIMIT 10 $.getJSON(files+"comments.php?action=view&load=initial&topic_id="+topic_id+"&t=" + (new Date()), function(json) { if(json.length) { for(i=0; i < json.length; i++) { $('#comment-list').prepend(prepare(json[i])); $('#list-' + count).fadeIn(1500); } } }); I return results like so while($row = mysql_fetch_array($res)){ $data[] = $row; } $out = json_encode($data); print $out;

  Read the article

• Same Data Appear only once.

  - by friendishan

  I have the following code which produces following output:- <? $tablaes = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM members where id='$order[user_id]'"); $user = mysql_fetch_array($tablaes); $idsd=$user['id']; $rPaid=mysql_query("SELECT SUM(`price`) AS total FROM order_history WHERE type!='rent_referral' AND date>'" . strtotime($time1) . "' AND date<'" . strtotime($time2) . "'"); $hdPaid = mysql_fetch_array($rPaid); $sPaid=mysql_query("SELECT SUM(`price`) AS total FROM order_history WHERE user_id='$idsd' AND type!='rent_referral' AND date>'" . strtotime($time1) . "' AND date<'" . strtotime($time2) . "'"); while ($hPaid = mysql_fetch_array($sPaid)) { ?> <td><?=$user['username']?></td> <td><?=$hPaid['total']?></td> <? } ?> </tr> It appears like this http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14384295/darrenan.jpg I want same data to appear only once.. Like Username: Vegas and price with him only once.

  Read the article

• Is there a way to do an "INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY UDPATE" in Zend Framework?

  - by danielrsmith

  I would like to use "ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" in Zend Framework, is this possible? Example INSERT INTO sometable (...) VALUES (...) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ...

  Read the article

• Exceptions handling in SQL?

  - by Vineet

  Is there any way to handle exceptions in sql(ORACLE 9i)? Since I was trying to divide values of a column that contains both numbers and literals ,I need to fetch out only numbers from it ,as if it divisible by any number then its number else if contains literals it would not get divided it will generate error. how to handle those errors? Please suggest!!

  Read the article

• Where I get wrong?

  - by Ole Jak

  I have PHP code like this require_once( "includes" . DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . "constants.php"); $userID = validKey( $key ); $query = "select a.username, b.streamID from user a, streams b where a.id = b.userID;)"; $connection = mysql_connect(DB_SERVER,DB_USER,DB_PASS); if (!$connection) { die("Database connection failed: " . mysql_error()); } $db_select = mysql_select_db(DB_NAME,$connection); if (!$db_select) {die( "Database selection failed: " . mysql_error()); } $generated_table = mysql_fetch_array(mysql_query($query, $connection)); // line (*) print_r($generated_table); But PHP gives me error/worning and does not print anything out Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given on line (*) 1) Why It does not printed me anything out 2) Where am I wrong?

  Read the article

• Persisting Serializable Objects in Hibernate

  - by VeeArr

  I am attempting to persist objects that contain some large Serializable types. I want Hibernate to automatically generate my DDL (using Hibernate annotations). For the most part, this works, but the default database column type used by Hibernate when persisting these types is tinyblob. Unfortunately, this causes crashes when attempting to persist my class, because these types will not fit within the length of tinyblob. However, if I manually set the type (using @Column(columnDefinition="longblob")), it works fine. Is there any way to make the default binary type longblob instead of tinyblob, so that I don't need to manually specify the @Column annotation on each field?

  Read the article

• How could I compare these database values in PHP?

  - by Dan

  So a user selects from a drop down list a value. I take this value, put it into a variable, then select from the database the ID value of that table A holding the selected value also. So now I'm trying to use that ID value to get to a many-to-many relationship table that has the selected value from table A to a different table B. The many-to-many relationship table has both IDs. How can I compare this using PHP? So it would be like: $A = $_POST['a']; $sql = "SELECT a, aID from TABLEA WHERE a = $A"; What do I do then to compare the aID with the many-to-many relationships table, then get the other ID in that table and then take that ID to get values from table B?

  Read the article

• PHP mysql_fetch does not return values

  - by Petr

  Hi, Being quite new with PHP, I cannot find any solution why this does not work. The query is OK and the resource is returned. But I dunno why fetch_assoc does not print values. Thanks $query=sprintf("SELECT ID,NAME FROM USERS WHERE PASS='%s' AND NAME='%s'",mysql_real_escape_string($p),mysql_real_escape_string($n)); $result=mysql_query($query); if ($result) { while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { echo $row['ID']; echo $row['NAME']; } } }

  Read the article

• Why is it inserting 0's instead of blank spaces into my DB using php?

  - by zeckdude

  I have an insert: $sql = 'INSERT into orders SET fax_int_prefix = "'.$_SESSION['fax_int_prefix'].'", fax_prefix = "'.$_SESSION['fax_prefix'].'", fax_first = "'.$_SESSION['fax_first'].'", fax_last = "'.$_SESSION['fax_last']; The value of all of these fields is that they are blank right before the insert. Here is an example of one of them I echo'd out just before the insert: $_SESSION[fax_prefix] = For some reason it inserts the integer 0, instead of a blank value or null, as it should. Why is it inserting 0's instead of blank spaces into my DB?

  Read the article

• Online Hotel Booking System, Simultaneous Booking?

  - by KiiroSora09

  I'm asked to create an online booking system with online payment and I'm wondering what to do in the case when 2 customers booked for the same room(s) at the same time. For Example: At the same time: Customer1 and Customer2 booked for a standard room which only has 1 room available. (The Room availability will display that there is still 1 room available). And then they hit the 'confirm' button at the same time.

  Read the article

• How do I simplify this php script

  - by user225269

  Any suggestions on how I can simplify the php script below?This was my previous question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2712237/how-to-check-if-a-checkbox-radio-button-is-checked-in-php that is linked to this one, What I'm trying to do here is to output the data depending on the checkbox that is checked. But my code isn't really good, it shows 2 tables if the condition is met by the 2 results. As you can see in the code below, any suggestions on how I can simplify this? <?php $con = mysql_connect("localhost","root","nitoryolai123$%^"); if (!$con) { die('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } mysql_select_db("school", $con); $id = mysql_real_escape_string($_POST['idnum']); if ( $_POST['yr'] == 'year' and $_POST['sec'] == 'section' ){ $result2 = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM student WHERE IDNO='$id'"); echo "<table border='1'> <tr> <th>IDNO</th> <th>YEAR</th> <th>SECTION</th> </tr>"; while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result2)) { echo "<tr>"; echo "<td>" . $row['IDNO'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['YEAR'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['SECTION'] . "</td>"; echo "</tr>"; } echo "</table>"; } if ( $_POST['yr'] == 'year' and $_POST['sec'] == 'section' and $_POST['lname'] == 'lastname'){ $result3 = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM student WHERE IDNO='$id'"); echo "<table border='1'> <tr> <th>IDNO</th> <th>YEAR</th> <th>SECTION</th> <th>LASTNAME</th> </tr>"; while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result3)) { echo "<tr>"; echo "<td>" . $row['IDNO'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['YEAR'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['SECTION'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['LASTNAME'] . "</td>"; echo "</tr>"; } echo "</table>"; } mysql_close($con); ?>

  Read the article

• PHP - Setting Database Info

  - by user1710648

  First off, I'm sorry if this shows no code which is not what Stack Overflow is about..But I have no clue where to go on this. I have a basic CMS I made, and I am trying to distribute it. I want to make it so that upon going to /cms/install for example, they set the database info, and different info to integrate into the CMS. Now my issue is, what would be the best method to allow the user to store that database info? A cookie seems to not be the right way..Could I store database info inside of a database? Not too sure where to go on this. More or less. What is the best way to temporarily store the database information the user gave before arrival of the full CMS.

  Read the article

• How do I select count() and LIMIT?

  - by alex

  SELECT * FROM ...LIMIT 5, 10 But what if I want the total rows? I don't want to make another query without the limit.

  Read the article

• Thumbnailing and then Saving as a Blob with PHP in Wordpress

  - by Parris

  The below code seems like it should work; however, the blob in the database only contains 0 after the function is run. Does the below code look accurate? If not how can I fix it? $tmpName = $_FILES['picture']['tmp_name']; $fp = fopen($tmpName, 'r'); $binary = fread($fp, filesize($tmpName)); fclose($fp); $originalImage = imagecreatefromstring($binary); $tempImage = imagecreate(100,100); imagecopyresized($tempImage,$originalImage,0,0,0,0,100,100); ob_start(); imageJPEG($tempImage); $thumbnail = ob_get_contents(); ob_end_clean(); $wpdb->query("UPDATE ".$wpdb->prefix."items SET picture = $thumbnail WHERE id=$id'"); Thank :)!

  Read the article

• Difference between "and" and "where" in joins

  - by Midhat

  Whats the difference between SELECT DISTINCT field1 FROM table1 cd JOIN table2 ON cd.Company = table2.Name and table2.Id IN (2728) and SELECT DISTINCT field1 FROM table1 cd JOIN table2 ON cd.Company = table2.Name where table2.Id IN (2728) both return the same result and both have the same explain output

  Read the article

• SQL algorithm question to convert a table

  - by every_answer_gets_a_point

  i have a table like this: 1 x y 2 a 3 b 4 c d e i want to use a sql statement to turn it into this: 1 x 1 y 2 a 3 b 4 c 4 d 4 e i am having trouble building the sql statement. please help!

  Read the article

• how to change a while sql query loop into an array loop

  - by Mac Taylor

  hey guys i record number of queries of my website and in page the below script runs , 40 extra queries added to page . how can I change this sql connection into a propper and light one function tree_set($index) { //global $menu; Remove this. $q=mysql_query("select id,name,parent from cats where parent='$index'"); if(mysql_num_rows($q) === 0) { return; } // User $tree instead of the $menu global as this way there shouldn't be any data duplication $tree = $index > 0 ? '<ul>' : ''; // If we are on index 0 then we don't need the enclosing ul while($arr=mysql_fetch_assoc($q)) { $subFileCount=mysql_query("select id,name,parent from cats where parent='{$arr['id']}'"); if(mysql_num_rows($subFileCount) > 0) { $class = 'folder'; } else { $class = 'file'; } $tree .= '<li>'; $tree .= '<span class="'.$class.'">'.$arr['name'].'</span>'; $tree .=tree_set("".$arr['id'].""); $tree .= '</li>'."\n"; } $tree .= $index > 0 ? '</ul>' : ''; // If we are on index 0 then we don't need the enclosing ul return $tree; } i heard , this can be done by changing it into an array , but i don't know how to do so thanks in advance

  Read the article

• which sql query is more efficient: select count(*) or select ... where key>value?

  - by davka

  I need to periodically update a local cache with new additions to some DB table. The table rows contain an auto-increment sequential number (SN) field. The cache keeps this number too, so basically I just need to fetch all rows with SN larger than the highest I already have. SELECT * FROM table where SN > <max_cached_SN> However, the majority of the attempts will bring no data (I just need to make sure that I have an absolutely up-to-date local copy). So I wander if this will be more efficient: count = SELECT count(*) from table; if (count > <cache_size>) // fetch new rows as above I suppose that selecting by an indexed numeric field is quite efficient, so I wander whether using count has benefit. On the other hand, this test/update will be done quite frequently and by many clients, so there is a motivation to optimize it.

  Read the article

• Update all but one result?

  - by Jack M.

  I'm trying to update a table to remove all but the first instance of a group. Basically, I have a table with vehicle data related to an insurance policy. Each policy should only have one power_unit. Everything else should be a towed unit. Unfortunately, a bug has been duplicating power units, and now I need to clean this up. There are ~10k records in the database, and ~4k of them have doubled up power units. The important bits of my table (call it test1 for now) are: +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(10) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | policy_id | int(10) | NO | | NULL | | | power_unit | int(1) | NO | | 0 | | +------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ And some sample data: +----+-----------+------------+ | id | policy_id | power_unit | +----+-----------+------------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 2 | 1 | | 5 | 2 | 1 | | 6 | 2 | 1 | | 7 | 4 | 1 | | 8 | 4 | 1 | | 9 | 4 | 1 | | 10 | 5 | 1 | | 11 | 5 | 1 | | 12 | 6 | 1 | +----+-----------+------------+ Basically I'd like to end up where policy_id 1 has only one power_unit=1. Same for policy_id 2, 3, 4, etc. For policy_id 6, nothing should change (there is only one entry, and it is a power_unit already). I don't know if this is possible, but it was an intriguing problem for me, so I thought you guys might find it the same.

  Read the article

• Sphinx without using an auto_increment id

  - by squeeks

  I am current in planning on creating a big database (2+ million rows) with a variety of data from separate sources. I would like to avoid structuring the database around auto_increment ids to help prevent against sync issues with replication, and also because each item inserted will have a alphanumeric product code that is guaranteed to be unique - it seems to me more sense to use that instead. I am looking at a search engine to index this database with Sphinx looking rather appealing due to its design around indexing relational databases. However, looking at various tutorials and documentation seems to show database designs being dependent on an auto_increment field in one form or another and a rather bold statement in the documentation saying that document ids must be 32/64bit integers only or things break. Is there a way to have a database indexed by Sphinx without auto_increment fields as the id?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396  | Next Page >