Search Results

Search found 1755 results on 71 pages for 'patch'.

Page 4/71 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Exadata Storage Server software upgrade is a new era in Patching

    - by Luis Moreno Campos
    Since it was first released, Exadata Storage Server software has been releasing patch releases like every software on the planet. Storage administrators would have to do this, but by some weird tradition, no matter what level of technology, if it says "Oracle" in it, IT Managers will immediately associate this with a task for the DBA. Not the case, but if it falls onto a DBA lap, fear no evil.The last patch released for Exadata Cells, is a true master piece in patching technology. This sentence is not mine, it's from both the customer and the partner that witnessed how 3 Exadata Cells where patch in less than 4 hours, after 12 months of without a single upgrade.The patch manager that takes care of everything will patch not only the software but also the firmware and the operating system. And you know it will all work out because back in the lab everything was already tested.All you have to do is stare at the 3 Sun ILOM Windows from the 3 cells and watch as they boot and reboot, patch and fix to the latest versions all layers of the storage machines. It's a new era in Patching technology!LMC

    Read the article

  • New Time Zone Patch DST V18 is available

    - by Mike Dietrich
    Sorry for not updating the blog more often at the moment - but more updates will come soon as I play around with Oracle Restart and single instance databases in ASM with Oracle 11.2. Just on the side there's a new time zone patch to DST V18 available since May 2012. You can download it via PATCH download from MOS with the patch number: 13417321 What do you think? Will Lufthansa operate a faster jet the other night? Will the jet stream be more powerful? Or a better type of fuel? Or is it just the travel portal which hasn't applied the correct time zone patches to catch DST change that night in the US whereas it happens two weeks later in Europe? Guess ... And please see the readme about how to apply the patch and our slides about why time zone patching may be important even in your environment RDBMS bug: Bug 13417321: DST 18 : HALF YEARLY DST PATCHES, MAY 2012 OJVM Bug 14112098 - dst changes for dstv18 (tzdata2012c) - need ojvm fix

    Read the article

  • June 2012 Critical Patch Update for Java SE Released

    - by Eric P. Maurice
    Hi, this is Eric Maurice. Oracle just released the June 2012 Critical Patch Update for Java SE.  This Critical Patch Update provides 14 new security fixes across Java SE products.  As discussed in previous blog entries, Critical Patch Updates for Java SE will, for the foreseeable future, continue to be released on a separate schedule than that of other Oracle products due to previous commitments made to Java customers.  12 of the 14 Java SE vulnerabilities fixed in this Critical Patch Update may be remotely exploitable without authentication.  6 of these vulnerabilities have a CVSS Base Score of 10.0.  In accordance with Oracle’s policies, these CVSS 10 scores represent instances where a user running a Java applet or Java Web Start application has administrator privileges (as is typical on Windows XP).  When the user does not run with administrator privileges (typical on the Solaris and Linux operating systems), the corresponding CVSS impact scores for Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability for these vulnerabilities would be "Partial" instead of "Complete", thus lowering these CVSS Base Scores to 7.5. Due to the high severity of these vulnerabilities, Oracle recommends that customers obtain and apply these security fixes as soon as possible: Developers should download the latest release at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html    Java users should download the latest release of JRE at http://java.com, and of course  Windows users can take advantage of the Java Automatic Update to get the latest release. In addition, Oracle recommends removing old an unused versions  of Java as the latest version is always the recommended version as it contains the most recent enhancements, and bug and security fixes.  For more information: •Instructions on removing older (and less secure) versions of Java can be found at http://java.com/en/download/faq/remove_olderversions.xml  •Users can verify that they’re running the most recent version of Java by visiting: http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp   •The Advisory for the June 2012 Critical Patch Update for Java SE is located at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujun2012-1515912.html

    Read the article

  • msysgit git-am can't apply it's own git format-patch sequence

    - by Andrian Nord
    I'm using msysgit git on windows to operate on central svn repository. I'm using git as I want to have it's awesome little local branches for everything and rebasing on each other. I also need to update from central repo often, so using separate svn/git is not an option. Problem is - git svn --help (man page) says that it is not a good idea to use git merge into master branch (which is set to track from svn's trunk) from local branches, as this will ruin the party and git svn dcommit would not work anymore. I know that it's not exactly true and you may use git merge if you are merging from branch which was properly rebased on master prior merge, but I'm trying to make it safer and actually use git format-patch and git am. We are using code review, so I'm making patches anyway. I also knew about git cherry-pick, but I want to just git am /reviewed/patches/dir/* without actually recalling what commits was corresponding to this patches (without reading patches, that is). So, what's wrong with git svn and git am? It's simple - git am for a few very hard points is doing CRLF into LF conversion for patches supplied (git-mailsplit is doing this, to be precise), if not rebasing. git format-patch is also producing proper (LF-ended) patches. As my repo is mostly CRLF (and it should remain so), patches are, obviously, failing due to wrong EOL. Converting diffs to CRLF and somehow hacking git am to prevent it from conversion is not working, too. It will fail if any file was removed or deleted - git apply will complain about expected /dev/null (but he got /dev/null^M). And if I'm applying it with git am --ignore-space-change --ignore-whitespace that it will commit LF endings straight to the index, which is also weird. I don't know if it will preserve over commiting into svn (via git svn dcommit) and checking it out and I don't want to try out. Of course, it's still possible to try hacking around patches to convert only actual diffs, but this is too much hacks for simple task. So, I wonder, is there really no established way to produce patches and apply them to the same repo on the same system? It just feels weird that msysgit can't apply it's own patches.

    Read the article

  • Resolving patch conflicts manually

    - by Antony Hatchkins
    I've downloaded a patch from some site and trying to apply it (twisted, python web framework). Several hunks failed. How do I automate manual patching process using vim? Details: I'm trying to automate the process of applying failed hunks. Many tiny changes, each about adding/removing 1-2 chars. Difficult to see. I Have to create two new temporary files and :diffthis them manually to see the difference. Yes, outside VCS. I can imagine a neat way to deal with it using git, but I would prefer to avoid creating git repo for that.

    Read the article

  • Is it recommended to apply the new said-great 200 line Linux kernel patch?

    - by takpar
    Hi, Nowadays I'm hearing a lot about the new ~200 line path to Linux kernel that is said makes sensible difference in performance. Now, do anyone has experience on applying this path on his Ubuntu kernel? I also saw an alternative way that claimed has a better result: wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/59511828/cgroup_patch chmod +x cgroup_patch sudo ./cgroup_patch What do you think this is? Is this validated? I ask this question because I need more performance but I can't risk on stability.

    Read the article

  • Critical Patch Updates During EBS 11i Exception to Sustaining Support Period

    - by Elke Phelps (Oracle Development)
    As previously blogged in the EBS 11i and 12.1 Support Timeline Changes entry, two important changes to the Oracle Lifetime Support policies were announced at Oracle OpenWorld 2012 - San Francisco.  These changes affect E-Business Suite Releases 11i and 12.1. Critical Patch Updates for EBS 11i during the Exception to Sustaining Support Period You may be wondering about the availability of Critical Patch Updates (CPU) for EBS 11i during the Exception to Sustaining Support period.  The following details the E-Business Suite Critical Patch Update support policy for EBS 11i during the Exception to Sustaining Support period: Oracle will continue to provide CPUs containing critical security fixes for E-Business Suite 11i.  CPUs will be packaged and released as as cumulative patches for both ATG RUP 6 and ATG RUP 7. As always, we try to minimize the number of patches and dependencies required for uptake of a CPU; however, there have been quite a few changes to the 11i baseline since its release.  For dependency reasons the 11i CPUs may require a higher number of files in order to bring them up to a consistent, stable, and well tested level. EBS 11i customer will continue to receive CPUs up to and including the October 2014 CPU. Where can I learn more? There are two interlocking policies that affect the E-Business Suite:  Oracle's Lifetime Support policies for each EBS release (timelines which were updated by this announcement), and the Error Correction Support policies (which state the minimum baselines for new patches). For more information about how these policies interact, see: Understanding Support Windows for E-Business Suite Releases What about E-Business Suite technology stack components? Things get more complicated when one considers individual techstack components such as Oracle Forms or the Oracle Database.  To learn more about the interlocking EBS+techstack component support windows, see these two articles: On Apps Tier Patching and Support: A Primer for E-Business Suite Users On Database Patching and Support: A Primer for E-Business Suite Users Where can I learn more about Critical Patch Updates?The Critical Patch Update Advisory is the starting point for relevant information. It includes a list of products affected, pointers to obtain the patches, a summary of the security vulnerabilities, and links to other important documents.  Related Articles EBS 11i and 12.1 Support Timeline Changes Frequently Asked Questions about Latest EBS Support Changes Extended Support Fees Waived for E-Business Suite 11i and 12.0

    Read the article

  • app-engine-patch and "object_detail" view didn't work

    - by Hugh
    Hi(Sorry for my ugly english) When I calling the flowing: http://192.168.62.90:8000/blog/entry/?agphdXR1bW4xOTEychALEgpibG9nX2VudHJ5GCYM will use this: urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^media/(?P<path>.*)$', 'django.views.static.serve', {'document_root': settings.MEDIA_ROOT, 'show_indexes': True}), (r'^$', list_detail.object_list, entry_info), (r'^entry/(?P<object_id>.*)$', list_detail.object_detail, {'queryset': Entry.all(), 'template_name': 'sample_test_page.html'}), ) and the error is: Generic view must be called with either an object_id or a slug/slug_field. I want to know why this didn't work for me.

    Read the article

  • HRMS Release Update Pack 7 for Release 12.1 - Patch 18004477 Released

    - by DanaD
    We are pleased to announce that Patch 18004477 HRMS Release Update Pack 7 for Release 12.1 was released on May 30, 2014. Please refer to the following notes for more details about 12.1 HRMS RUP7: Doc ID 1645859.1 Oracle Human Resources Management Systems Readme, HRMS Release Update Pack 7 for Release 12.1 Doc ID 1636758.1 Known Issues on Top of Patch 18004477 - R12.HR_PF.B.DELTA.7 Please review the following extremely important patching notes: Doc ID 135266.1 Oracle HRMS Productive Family - Release 11i and Release 12 Doc ID 145837.1 Latest HRMS (HR Global) Legislative Data Patch Available Doc ID 140511.1 How to Install Legislative Data Using Data Installer and hrglobal.drv Doc ID 158275.1 Troubleshooting Guide for HRMS Post Install Steps Doc ID 300097.1 HRGLOBAL Basics Doc ID 276928.1 Requirements for Address Validation with HR Only Installation Doc ID 161818.1 Oracle Database (RDBMS) Releases Support Status Summary

    Read the article

  • Patch an application

    - by oidfrosty
    I need to create a patching routine for my application, it's really small but I need to update it daily or weekly how does the xdelta and the others work? i've read around about those but I didn't understand much of it

    Read the article

  • OBIEE 11g recommended patch sets

    - by THE
     Martin has busied himself to combine the recommended patch sets for OBIEE 11g into one single useful KM note.(This one contains the recommendations for 11.1.1.5 as well as those for 11.1.1.6) OBIEE 11g: Required and Recommended Patches and Patch Sets (Doc ID 1488475.1) So if you are looking for update/patch information for your OBIEE installation - this is most likely a useful stop. And as patching is an ongoing process you may want to bookmark this KM doc, as I am sure Martin will keep this current as new patches come out. Oh - and if you are looking for upgrade information from 11.1.1.5 to 11.1.1.6, KM Doc ID 1434253.1 might just be the thing you are looking for.

    Read the article

  • WebCenter Sites 11gR1 Bundled Patch 1 is now available

    - by R.Hunter
    There is a new patch available for WebCenter Sites - 11gR1 Bundled Patch 1. The download links can be obtained from the WebCenter Sites Download page. Some of the highlights of WebCenter Sites 11gR1 Bundled Patch 1 are listed below: - UI Customization support  - A new developer’s guide is available for use in customizing the Contributor UI. Customizable UI components include the Dashboard, search views, tools bars, menus, and asset-forms. In addition, global or site specific configuration properties can be specified for controlling what is displayed in the UI. - Localization support – The contributor UI is localized for the following languages: French, German, Italian, Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, Simplified &Traditional Chinese - Developer tools (CSDT) now supports connection to a remote Sites server- Security updates including a request authentication filter to prevent CSRF attacks, REST API updates, and more.- Session replication support in the management user interfaces- Bug fixes Please refer to the release notes and documentation for more information.

    Read the article

  • Do you really need cable management for a cabinet with just switches and patch panels?

    - by ObligatoryMoniker
    We are about to start wiring out a building expansion and our vendor has laid out the racks in the following configuration: Option 1 1U Fiber patch panel 2U Cable Manager 2U 48 port Patch Panel 2U Cable Manager 2U 48 port Patch Panel 2U Cable Manager 1U 48 port Switch 2U Cable Manager 1U 48 port Switch Total = 15U All the patch panels would be connected to the switches with 1ft+ cables fed through cable management. What I am considering instead is: Option 2 1U Fiber patch panel 1U 24 port Patch Panel 1U 48 port Switch 2U 48 port Patch Panel 1U 48 port Switch 2U 48 port Patch Panel Total = 8U All of the patch panels would be connected to the switches with .5 ft cables directly on their face with the top 24 ports of each switch patched to the patch panel above it and the bottom 24 ports of each switch patched to the patch panel beneath it which would not require any cable management. If I go with option 2 it save all of the space used by cable management and allows us to keep adding on switches and patch panels at the end without having to re-cable all of the patch panels above. Our vendor has indicated that this is not best practice and that .5ft cables will introduce cross talk. I could understand that being the case if we were connecting the .5 ft cable directly into another switch but we are connecting it to a patch panel that likely has another 150 ft cable run from the back of the patch panel out to the port in the building in which case the real resulting cable is 150.5 ft at minimum before even connecting it to a PC. It seems like it makes much more sense to go with option 2. It is easier to expand, saves space, and saves money on cabling and cable management. Does this kind of configuration make sense or is there a legitimate reason to choose Option 1 over Option 2?

    Read the article

  • Microsoft publie le Patch Tuesday du mois d'avril, qui corrige 11 failles de sécurité

    Microsoft publie le Patch Tuesday du mois d'avril Qui corrige 11 failles de sécurité Le Patch Tuesday survient le deuxième mardi de chaque mois ; Microsoft publie des correctifs de sécurité à destination de ses clients. Les bulletins sont qualifiés Faible, Modéré, Important ou Critique. Le Patch Tuesday du mois d'avril 2012 comporte six bulletins (du MS12-023 au MS12-028) qui corrigent 11 vulnérabilités. Quatre d'entre eux sont qualifiés de "critique" par l'éditeur (contre un seul le mois dernier). Un bulletin concerne les systèmes Microsoft Windows, un second concerne Internet Explorer, un troisième le Framework .NET et le dernier concerne Microsoft Office, Micr...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft publie le Patch Tuesday du mois de novembre, qui corrige quatre vulnérabilités

    Microsoft vient de publier le Patch Tuesday du mois de novembre Qui corrige quatre vulnérabilités Le Patch Tuesday survient le deuxième mardi du mois ; Microsoft publie des correctifs de sécurité à destination de ses clients. Le patch de novembre corrige quatre vulnérabilités (CVE-2011-2004, CVE-2011-2013, CVE-2011-2014, CVE-2011-2016), toutes signalées confidentiellement à Microsoft. Une est considérée comme critique, une comme modérée et les deux dernières comme importantes. La première vulnérabilité, référencée CVE-2011-2013, permet via un integer overflow d'un compteur dans la pile TCP/IP de Windows, une exploitation de code arbitraire en mode noyau.

    Read the article

  • How to create a patch

    - by rajeshkolli
    Hello.. How do i create a patch for my web application ? Hello we have a scenario like changes we have made in application should be reflected, previously we use to send whole package build , inspite of that is there any other way to simply create a patch file that should reflect changes in application. i've googled abt this however many of the forums saying that to use some third party tools.. Is it ok to go for third party tools.. coz our application is stable now.. in field now shouldnt take any risk... Is there any safe way to implement with please do suggest me and give me guidance on how to.. with this patch creation.. Thanks in advance.. Rajesh.Kolli

    Read the article

  • Critical Patch Update for October 2013 Now Available

    - by LuciaC
    The  Critical Patch Update (CPU) for October 2013 was released on October 15, 2013.  Oracle strongly recommends applying the patches as soon as possible.The Critical Patch Update Advisory is the starting point for relevant information.  It includes a list of products affected, pointers to obtain the patches, a summary of the security vulnerabilities, and links to other important documents. E-Business Suite Releases 11i and 12 Reference: Oracle E-Business Suite Releases 11i and 12 Critical Patch Update Knowledge Document (October 2013) (Doc ID 1585639.1) Secure Configuration Guide for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 (Doc ID 403537.1) Secure Configuration Guide for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11i (Doc ID 189367.1)

    Read the article

  • New RUP Patch for iSupplier Portal, Sourcing and Supplier Lifecycle Management (SLM)

    - by LuciaC
    Just released - the 12.1.3 Rollup (RUP) Patch 17525552:R12.PRC_PF.B for iSupplier Portal, Sourcing and Supplier Lifecycle Management (SLM). Who should apply this patch? Anyone that is on Release 12.1.3 and is using  iSupplier Portal, Sourcing or Supplier Lifecycle Management (SLM) functionality. The following areas have had major fixes: Prospective Supplier Guided Navigation: The train-navigation is introduced for prospective supplier registration so that prospective suppliers can see all steps needed to successfully register themselves. Supplier Registration Workflow Enhancement: With this release, provided the Approval Management Engine (AME) action required notifications for supplier approval, so that all workflow related features can be enabled. Vacation rules can be set, approvals can be forwarded and more information can be requested through the notification itself.  Additionally AME parallel Approval support for Supplier Registration approvals has been added. Reinstate Supplier Request: Allow buyer to reopen/reinstate the rejected supplier. Supplier is able to access their previously rejected registration again and make changes and resubmit request. Contact Address Association: The prospective supplier is allowed to associate addresses with contacts (including Primary) during the prospective supplier registration process. Primary Contact Enhancement: The prospective supplier can be registered without creating a user account for the primary contact. Mandatory Attributes: In the negotiation requirement creation page, the lookup meaning of 'Internal' has been changed to 'Internal Optional', and a new lookup value with meaning as 'Internal Required' has been added. The values available in the 'Type' dropdown now are Display Only, Internal Optional, Internal Required, Supplier Optional and Supplier Required.  So now during supplier evaluations, internal user response can be set as mandatory by using Internal Required type during requirement creation. Notifications to Supplier:  When the supplier saves and submits their supplier registration request, then a notification with a registration status page link will be sent for further access.  When the buyer approves, rejects or returns the request, the supplier will be notified in an email with the current status. There are also 10 major enhancements included in this RUP. For information about this RUP; including, the fixes and enhancements included, how to access and apply the patch, performing an impact analysis on your system, and testing recommendations, see Doc ID 1591198.1.  Don’t delay apply the patch today!

    Read the article

  • Patch Tuesday Again!

    - by TATWORTH
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/TATWORTH/archive/2014/06/10/patch-tuesday-again.aspxThe second Tuesday of the month is “Patch Tuesday” when Microsoft issues the security and other important fixes for the month. This month there are two critical and five important patches. So watch out for these patches and apply them to your Windows PCs as soon as you can. For more details see http://www.itpro.co.uk/desktop-software/22421/microsoft-to-roll-out-two-critical-security-bug-fixes.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >