Search Results

Search found 79588 results on 3184 pages for 'sql data storage'.

Page 418/3184 | < Previous Page | 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425  | Next Page >

  • Using SQL to calculate a date within a certain date range

    - by David Passmore
    Hi, I'm using access 2007 and i am trying to set up a database to act as a library system, i need a function that automatically calculates a date 14 days after a given date i.e. Loan Date vs. Due Date. But the library is open only on certain Days. So i need the 14 days not to include the dates that are out of hours, like weekends and school holidays etc. I think i need to use Select Case or IIF's? Help would be appreciated! Thanks David

    Read the article

  • C# LINQ to SQL Except Operator

    - by kb
    Hi i have a list of event Ids that i want to be excluded from my select statement, but no sure how to implement this: this is what stores my list of event Ids List<int> ExcludedEvents; and this is my select statement (from an XML feed) var allEvents = from eventsList in xmlDoc.Elements("shows").Elements("Show") select new EventFeed() { EventName = eventsList.Attribute("Name").Value, EventSummary = eventsList.Attribute("ShortDesc").Value, EventDetails = eventsList.Attribute("LongDesc").Value, EventShowCode = eventsList.Attribute("Code").Value }; i want to select all events except for the events that have their eventId matching the EventShowCode value i have looked at the except operator, but not sure how to implement it thanks

    Read the article

  • sql - HAVING at least 10

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i would like to display results for values that are only 10 and over select name, count(*) from actor join casting on casting.actorid = actor.id where casting.ord = 1 group by name order by 2 desc that will return this: name count(*) Sean Connery 19 Harrison Ford 19 Robert De Niro 18 Sylvester Stallone 18 etc but i want to return values of count(*) that are only above 10 how do i do this? with having?

    Read the article

  • Linq-to-sql orderby thenby

    - by Curtis White
    I'm using the following query syntax from table where where orderby orderby Where the first orderby is a date and second orderby is a date. I would assume this would work like orderby thenby but appears to be doing something else. 1 How can I do an orderby thenby using the above syntax without using extension syntax. (Got it) 2 And what does the orderby, orderby do?

    Read the article

  • PHP + SQL Server or VB.NET + MySQL

    - by Muhammad Mussnoon
    Can someone suggest that out of the two mentioned (odd?) combinations, which is less odd, or in other words, is less trouble to work with + maintain. If it helps, the system is going to have two front-ends - one web application and one desktop application. The desktop application is going to be coded using VB.NET, and the web application in PHP. There's really no reason why the desktop application can't be replaced by a web application as well - except that one of the programmers seem to really want to code it in VB.... However, none of us have experience working with either of these pairs (you could easily call us n00bs), so we are a bit apprehensive to start. P.S. hosting service will be gotten from some provider and not be on the client's own server.

    Read the article

  • SQL: Gather right hand values from a join

    - by Max Williams
    Let's say a question has many tags, via a join table called taggings. I do a join thus: SELECT DISTINCT `questions`.id FROM `questions` LEFT OUTER JOIN `taggings` ON `taggings`.taggable_id = `questions`.id LEFT OUTER JOIN `tags` ON `tags`.id = `taggings`.tag_id I want to order the results according to a particular tag name, eg 'piano', so that piano is at the top, then by all the other tags in alphabetical order. Currently i'm using this order clause: ORDER BY (tags.name = 'piano') desc, tags.name Which is going completely wrong - the first results i get back aren't even tagged with 'piano' at all. I think my problem is that i need to group the tag names somehow and do my ordering test against that: i think that doing it against the straight tags.name isn't working due to the structure of the resultant join table (it does work if i just do a simple select on the tags table) but i can't get my head around how to fix it. grateful for any advice, max

    Read the article

  • fill data in dropdown box as per previous dropdown box data selected in aspnet mvc 1

    - by FosterZ
    hi, i'm buildin' an employee registration form in aspnet mvc, i have fields like "School" list in 1 dropdown box and "Department" list another, problem is i want to show Department list on change of School list, i have done followin' code: public ActionResult EmployeeCreate() { var getSchool = SchoolRepository.GetAllSchoolsInArray();//this gets school_id as value and school_name as text for dropdown box ViewData["SchoolsList"] = getSchool; return View(); } [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult EmployeeCreate() { _employeeRepository.CreateEmployee(employeeToCreate); _employeeRepository.SaveToDb(); } Here is the View Html.DropDownList("SchoolLists") Html.DropDownList("DepartmentLists") now, how do i get the departments of selected school in dropdown boxes

    Read the article

  • Connecting to SQL Server in Php - Extension Err

    - by John Doe
    <html> <head> <title>Connecting </title> </head> <body> <?php $host = "*.*.*.*"; $username = "xxx"; $password = "xxx"; $db_name = "xxx"; $db = mssql_connect($host, $username,$password) or die("Couldnt Connect"); $selected = mssql_select_db($db_name, $db) or die("Couldnt open database"); ?> </body> </html> My error message is: Fatal error: Call to undefined function mssql_connect() in C:\wamp\www\php\dbase.php on line 12 I am using WampServer 2.0 on Php 5.3.0 When I check the extensions, php_mssql is Checked. I also checked the php.ini file to make sure it is not commented out. I have my file dbase.php saved in C:\wamp\www\php. I have tried stopping the service, closing everything, and running it again. I know the problem is that the extension file is not being included somehow. The below is copied from my php.ini file. Note I made all http = /http to avoid posting Links. ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Paths and Directories ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; UNIX: "/path1:/path2" ;include_path = ".:/php/includes" ; Windows: "\path1;\path2" include_path = "C:\wamp\bin\php\php5.3.0\ext" ; ; PHP's default setting for include_path is ".;/path/to/php/pear" ; /http://php.net/include-path ; The root of the PHP pages, used only if nonempty. ; if PHP was not compiled with FORCE_REDIRECT, you SHOULD set doc_root ; if you are running php as a CGI under any web server (other than IIS) ; see documentation for security issues. The alternate is to use the ; cgi.force_redirect configuration below ; /http://php.net/doc-root doc_root = ; The directory under which PHP opens the script using /~username used only ; if nonempty. ; /http://php.net/user-dir user_dir = ; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside. ; /http://php.net/extension-dir ; extension_dir = "./" ; On windows: ; extension_dir = "ext" extension_dir = "c:/wamp/bin/php/php5.3.0/ext/" ; Whether or not to enable the dl() function. The dl() function does NOT work ; properly in multithreaded servers, such as IIS or Zeus, and is automatically ; disabled on them. ; /http://php.net/enable-dl enable_dl = Off ; cgi.force_redirect is necessary to provide security running PHP as a CGI under ; most web servers. Left undefined, PHP turns this on by default. You can ; turn it off here AT YOUR OWN RISK ; You CAN safely turn this off for IIS, in fact, you MUST. ; /http://php.net/cgi.force-redirect ;cgi.force_redirect = 1 ; if cgi.nph is enabled it will force cgi to always sent Status: 200 with ; every request. PHP's default behavior is to disable this feature. ;cgi.nph = 1 ; if cgi.force_redirect is turned on, and you are not running under Apache or Netscape ; (iPlanet) web servers, you MAY need to set an environment variable name that PHP ; will look for to know it is OK to continue execution. Setting this variable MAY ; cause security issues, KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING FIRST. ; /http://php.net/cgi.redirect-status-env ;cgi.redirect_status_env = ; ; cgi.fix_pathinfo provides real PATH_INFO/PATH_TRANSLATED support for CGI. PHP's ; previous behaviour was to set PATH_TRANSLATED to SCRIPT_FILENAME, and to not grok ; what PATH_INFO is. For more information on PATH_INFO, see the cgi specs. Setting ; this to 1 will cause PHP CGI to fix its paths to conform to the spec. A setting ; of zero causes PHP to behave as before. Default is 1. You should fix your scripts ; to use SCRIPT_FILENAME rather than PATH_TRANSLATED. ; /http://php.net/cgi.fix-pathinfo ;cgi.fix_pathinfo=1 ; FastCGI under IIS (on WINNT based OS) supports the ability to impersonate ; security tokens of the calling client. This allows IIS to define the ; security context that the request runs under. mod_fastcgi under Apache ; does not currently support this feature (03/17/2002) ; Set to 1 if running under IIS. Default is zero. ; /http://php.net/fastcgi.impersonate ;fastcgi.impersonate = 1; ; Disable logging through FastCGI connection. PHP's default behavior is to enable ; this feature. ;fastcgi.logging = 0 ; cgi.rfc2616_headers configuration option tells PHP what type of headers to ; use when sending HTTP response code. If it's set 0 PHP sends Status: header that ; is supported by Apache. When this option is set to 1 PHP will send ; RFC2616 compliant header. ; Default is zero. ; /http://php.net/cgi.rfc2616-headers ;cgi.rfc2616_headers = 0 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; File Uploads ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Whether to allow HTTP file uploads. ; /http://php.net/file-uploads file_uploads = On ; Temporary directory for HTTP uploaded files (will use system default if not ; specified). ; /http://php.net/upload-tmp-dir upload_tmp_dir = "c:/wamp/tmp" ; Maximum allowed size for uploaded files. ; /http://php.net/upload-max-filesize upload_max_filesize = 2M Also, my php.ini file is saved in: C:\wamp\bin\apache\Apache2.2.11\bin

    Read the article

  • SQL Joins on varchar fields timing out

    - by CL4NCY
    Hi, I have a join which deletes rows that match another table but the joining fields have to be a large varchar (250 chars). I know this isn't ideal but I can't think of a better way. Here's my query: DELETE P FROM dbo.FeedPhotos AS P INNER JOIN dbo.ListingPhotos AS P1 ON P.photo = P1.feedImage INNER JOIN dbo.Listings AS L ON P.accountID = L.accountID WHERE P.feedID = @feedID This query is constantly timing out even though there are less than 1000 rows in the ListingPhotos table. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • building SQL Query From another Query in php

    - by Nina
    Hello when I Try to built Query from another Query in php code I Faced some problem can you tell me why? :( code : $First="SELECT ro.RoomID,ro.RoomName,ro.RoomLogo,jr.RoomID,jr.MemberID,ro.RoomDescription FROM joinroom jr,rooms ro where (ro.RoomID=jr.RoomID)AND jr.MemberID = '1' "; $sql1 = mysql_query($First); $constract .= "ro.RoomName LIKE '%$search_each%'"; $constract="SELECT * FROM $sql1 WHERE $constract ";// This statment is Make error

    Read the article

  • Possible Data Execution Prevention problem in Windows 7

    - by Joel in Gö
    I have a serious problem with my .Net program. It calls a native dll, and then crashes instantly because it can't find a native method. This is behaviour we have seen before, whereby the C# compiler, in its infinite wisdom, sets the flag that the program is DEP compatible, even if it calls a native dll which patently is not. We have the standard workaround for this, where the flag is set to Not DEP Compatible in a post-build step, and this works fine. Everywhere except on my machine. I have Windows 7 32bit, and the program works fine on the Win 7 64bit machines that we have, as well as on Vista and XP; we have not yet been able to check on another Win7 32bit. However, on my machine the DataExecutionPolicy_SupportPolicy is 0, i.e. we have successfully switched DEP off. The dll in question also works fine when called from a native program. We are running out of ideas... any help would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • How to achieve the following RTO & RPO with logshipping only using SQL Server?

    - by Jimmy Chandra
    Trying to come up with viable backup restore & logshipping solution for achieving the following: 15 minutes Recovery Point Objective (no more than 15 minutes data loss at any time) 5 minutes Recovery Time Objective (must be able to get the db up and running back by 5 minutes) Considering using logshipping only (which I think is kind of pushing it, but I want to know if anyone else know how to achieve this). Some other info for consideration: Using 40 Gbit / sec fiber channel between the primary and disaster recovery (DRC) sites The sites are about 600 km apart. At close of business, the amount of data generated is predicted to be about 150 MB/sec. Log backup is planned for every 5 min. Doing some rough calculation I came up w/ the following numbers: 40 Gbit / sec = 5 MB / sec @ 100% network efficiency. 5 MB / sec = 300 MB / min. @ 300 MB / min, the total amount of data that can be transfer considering the 5min RTO is about 1.5GB, but that will left no time for the actual backup and restore, so if we cut it down to 3min logshipping time, which equals to ~900 MB over 3 minutes at 100% network efficiency, that will left about 1 min backup time and 1 minute restore time. Currently don't have any information if the system being used is capable of restoring 900 MB in 1 min, but assume it can. for COB scenario... 150 MB/sec, and considering the 3 min logshipping time, which should equal to about 27 GB of data over 3 mins...??? I think this is where the SLA will break... since there is no way to transfer 27 GB of data over a 40Gbit/sec line in 3 min. Can I get someone else opinion? I am thinking database mirroring might be a better answer for this...

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL join when there aren't results

    - by Boarder2
    Given the following database structure I'm trying to write a LINQ query that will return images grouped by tags it's associated with. So far I've got this: var images = from img in db.Images join imgTags in db.ImageTags on img.idImage equals imgTags.idImage join t in db.Tags on imgTags.idTag equals t.idTag where img.OCRData.Contains(searchText.Text) group img by new { t.TagName } into aGroup select new { GroupName = aGroup.Key.TagName, Items = from x in aGroup select new ImageFragment() { ImageID = x.idImage, ScanDate = x.ScanTime } }; Which works great. However, I also want to return Images that do not have any tags associated with them in a group of "(Untagged)" or something. I can't wrap my head around how I would do this without inserting a default tag for every image and that seems like generally not a very good solution.

    Read the article

  • Finding duplicate values in a SQL table

    - by Alex
    It's easy to find duplicates with one field SELECT name, COUNT(email) FROM users GROUP BY email HAVING ( COUNT(email) > 1 ) So if we have a table ID NAME EMAIL 1 John [email protected] 2 Sam [email protected] 3 Tom [email protected] 4 Bob [email protected] 5 Tom [email protected] This query will give us John, Sam, Tom, Tom because they all have the same e-mails. But what I want, is to get duplicates with the same e-mails and names. I want to get Tom, Tom. I made a mistake, and allowed to insert duplicate name and e-mail values. Now I need to remove/change the duplicates. But I need to find them first.

    Read the article

  • SQL orderby / case issue: orderdirection fail

    - by Joris
    I got a stored procedure that delivers a table of students, and it needs to order by surname, name etc... it also needs to sort ascending, descending, depending on the parameter @orderby... code: ORDER BY CASE WHEN @orderby = 'studentkey' THEN Studentkey END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'studentkey' and @desc = 1 THEN Studentkey END DESC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'initials' THEN Initials END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'initials' and @desc = 1 THEN Initials END DESC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'firstname' THEN Firstname END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'firstname' and @desc = 1 THEN Firstname END DESC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'nickname' THEN Nickname END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'nickname' and @desc = 1 THEN Nickname END DESC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'insertion' THEN Insertion END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'insertion' and @desc = 1 THEN Insertion END DESC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'surname' THEN Surname END ASC, CASE WHEN @orderby = 'surname' and @desc = 1 THEN Surname END DESC NED There is a difference in output between @desc = 1 and @desc = 0, but not what i desire... Does anyone have a solution?

    Read the article

  • MS SQL Return 1 Row Per Boat

    - by Tyler
    Basically, what I want to do is join 4 tables together and return 1 row for each boat. Table Layouts [Boats] id, date, section, raft [Photos] id, boatid, pthurl, purl [River_Company] id, sort, company, company_short [River_Section] id, section Its very simple as far as structure, however, I've having the time of my life trying to get it to return only 1 row. No boat will ever be on the same day, the only thing that's messing this up is the photo table. If you know a better way for it to return the record table for all the boats boats and only 1 photo from the photo table, please, please post it!!

    Read the article

  • Correlated SQL Join Query from multiple tables

    - by SooDesuNe
    I have two tables like the ones below. I need to find what exchangeRate was in effect at the dateOfPurchase. I've tried some correlated sub queries, but I'm having difficulty getting the correlated record to be used in the sub queries. I expect a solution will need to follow this basic outline: SELECT only the exchangeRates for the applicable countryCode From 1. SELECT the newest exchangeRate less than the dateOfPurchase Fill in the query table with all the fields from 2. and the purchasesTable. My Tables: purchasesTable: > dateOfPurchase | costOfPurchase | countryOfPurchase > 29-March-2010 | 20.00 | EUR > 29-March-2010 | 3000 | JPN > 30-March-2010 | 50.00 | EUR > 30-March-2010 | 3000 | JPN > 30-March-2010 | 2000 | JPN > 31-March-2010 | 100.00 | EUR > 31-March-2010 | 125.00 | EUR > 31-March-2010 | 2000 | JPN > 31-March-2010 | 2400 | JPN costOfPurchase is in whatever the local currency is for a given countryCode exchangeRateTable > effectiveDate | countryCode | exchangeRate > 29-March-2010 | JPN | 90 > 29-March-2010 | EUR | 1.75 > 30-March-2010 | JPN | 92 > 31-March-2010 | JPN | 91 The results of the query that I'm looking for: > dateOfPurchase | costOfPurchase | countryOfPurchase | exchangeRate > 29-March-2010 | 20.00 | EUR | 1.75 > 29-March-2010 | 3000 | JPN | 90 > 30-March-2010 | 50.00 | EUR | 1.75 > 30-March-2010 | 3000 | JPN | 92 > 30-March-2010 | 2000 | JPN | 92 > 31-March-2010 | 100.00 | EUR | 1.75 > 31-March-2010 | 125.00 | EUR | 1.75 > 31-March-2010 | 2000 | JPN | 91 > 31-March-2010 | 2400 | JPN | 91 So for example in the results, the exchange rate, in effect for EUR on 31-March was 1.75. I'm using Access, but a MySQL answer would be fine too. UPDATE: Modification to Allan's answer: SELECT dateOfPurchase, costOfPurchase, countryOfPurchase, exchangeRate FROM purchasesTable p LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT e1.exchangeRate, e1.countryCode, e1.effectiveDate, min(e2.effectiveDate) AS enddate FROM exchangeRateTable e1 LEFT OUTER JOIN exchangeRateTable e2 ON e1.effectiveDate < e2.effectiveDate AND e1.countryCode = e2.countryCode GROUP BY e1.exchangeRate, e1.countryCode, e1.effectiveDate) e ON p.dateOfPurchase >= e.effectiveDate AND (p.dateOfPurchase < e.enddate OR e.enddate is null) AND p.countryOfPurchase = e.countryCode I had to make a couple small changes.

    Read the article

  • SQL Replace Into question

    - by Matt
    With Replace Into, if I have two fields. FirstName LastName. The table has John Smith in it, if I was to run REPLACE INTO tblNames (FirstName, LastName) VALUES (John, Jones) Would that replace Smith with Jones, or create a new name? What determines if its an Update or and Insert?

    Read the article

  • SQL SELECT: "Give me all documents where all of the documents procedures are 'work in progress'"

    - by prestonmarshall
    This one really has me stumped. I have a documents table which hold info about the documents, and a procedures table, which is kind of like a revisions table for each document. What I need to do is write a select statement which gives me all of the documents where all of the procedures have the status "work_in_progress". Here's an example procedures table: document_id | status 1 | 'wip' 1 | 'wip' 1 | 'wip' 1 | 'approved' 2 | 'wip' 2 | 'wip' 2 | 'wip' Here, I would want my query to only return document id 2, because all of its statuses are work_in_progress. I DO NOT want document_id 1 since one of its statuses is 'approved'. I believe this is relational division I want, but I'm not sure where to start. This is MySQL 5.0 FYI.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use ContainsTable to get results for more than one column?

    - by LockeCJ
    Consider the following table: People FirstName nvarchar(50) LastName nvarchar(50) Let's assume for the moment that this table has a full-text index on it for both columns. Let's suppose that I wanted to find all of the people named "John Smith" in this table. The following query seems like a perfectly rational way to accomplish this: SELECT * from People p INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(People,*,'"John*" AND "Smith*"') Unfortunately, this will return no results, assuming that there is no record in the People table that contains both "John" and "Smith" in either the FirstName or LastName columns. It will not match a record with "John" in the FirstName column, and "Smith" in the LastName column, or vice-versa. My question is this: How does one accomplish what I'm trying to do above? Please consider that the example above is simplified. The real table I'm working with has ten columns and the input I'm receiving is a single string which is split up based on standard word breakers (space, dash, etc.)

    Read the article

  • How can I select values from different rows depending on the most recent entry date, all for the sam

    - by user321185
    Basically I have a table which is used to hold employee work wear details. It is formed of the columns: EmployeeID, CostCentre, AssociateLevel, IssueDate, TrouserSize, TrouserLength, TopSize & ShoeSize. An employee can be assigned a pair of trousers, a top and shoes at the same time or only one or two pieces of clothing. As we all know peoples sizes and employee levels can change which is why I need help really. Different types of employees (associatelevels) require different colours of clothing but you can ignore this part. Everytime an employee receives an item of clothing a new row will be inserted into the table with an input date. I need to be able to select the most recent clothes size for each item of clothing for each employee. It is not necessary for all the columns to hold values because an employee could receive trousers or poloshirts at different times in the year. So for example if employee '54664LSS' was given a pair of 'XL' trousers and a 'L' top on 24/03/11 but then received a 'M' top on 26/05/10. The input of these items would be help on two different rows obviously. So if I wanted to select the most recent clothing for each clothes category. Then the values of the 'M' sized top and the 'L' sized trousers would need to be returned. Any help would be greatly appreciated as I'm pretty stuck :(. Thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425  | Next Page >